The layout of approval for bid

hi guru,
Could u give me a screen snap about the approval for bid? I just want to know if the approver can compare the prices from different bidders. How the screen looks like.
Thank you in advance.

if i click on display all recording it fetching 40 records when i give the page limit 20 records if click on next page records it showing the error

Similar Messages

How to Implement N-Level Approval for Bid,Live Auction,PO,Contract ?

Hi Experts,
I am new to SRM 5.0. My requirement is how to implement N-Level Approval for Bid, Auction, PO and Contract? Which steps should I follow for N-Level Approval? Can any one send me sample code and name of BADI where I have to implement the code.
Abhijeet Panse

Hi
Please check for <b>BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI</b> using SE18 transaction for relevant Code as well and standard SAP documentation.
Related sample code and other useful pointers ->
WS14500015 is not working for Multilevel approval
Re: SRM / Shipping cart
Re: N Step Approval BADI - BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI
Re: N-step BADI workflow
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/8b/4fa9585db211d2b404006094b92d37/content.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/2c/e68d406b305537e10000000a1550b0/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_srm50/helpdata/en/17/40a86c773d6c41801d78af1a34b90f/frameset.htm
Multiple Implementation For BBP_WFL_APPROV_BADI
Re: Help needed on N-Step Approval WFL for SC
Re: N-Step 14000109 workflow - Unable to identify Approvers
Do let me know.
Regards
- Atul

How to modify the layout and coding for 'RVORDER01' after copying ..

Hi all,
I am trying to modify standard script layout SALES ORDER for Quotation,
i.e. I had copied standard form 'RVORDER01' to 'ZBAT_RVORDER01'.
and now I am trying to compress the information box. But no box in the layout was selecting while trying to resize it. Can any one help in this issue.
And I also want to know, how to modify the coding in that standard script. i.e. to add a perform statement and etc..
Thanks in advance,
Surender.

GOTO SE71, and give the form name as 'ZBAT_RVORDER01' and Language as DE, try to compress the box according to your requirement, save activate and return to SE71, now change the language to EN, you will see the compressed window in EN.
The casue of your problem is the original language is in DE so window changes, character formats etc can be done in DE language or change original language to english,
TO change original language to EN, SE71 ,FOrm name Language DE click change, goto utilities--> change Language.
Regards,
Sairam

How to check the layout defined for an ALV program

Hi All,
I have an ALV-program which uses radio buttons to display the list either in an Hierarchical format or in a Simple list format. In the selection screen there is a field for specifying the layout.
Now the problem is, if a layout is created for Hierachical display and that layout is used to display the list in a simple list format the program doesn't give the desired output and vice versa.
So i need to put a check in the program, to check whether the layout given in the selection screen is meant for a Simple List display or for an Hierarchical display and accordingly throw an error message regarding the mismatch if any.
Is there any standard Function Module to check whether the layout is defined for a Simple List display or an Hieracrchical List display? Or is there any other way to do this checking????
Thanks in Advance!!!
Anindya

Hi Venkat,
The problem is:
I need to know whether the LAYOUT(given in the selection screen) is defined for a SIMPLE LIST DISPLAY or an HIERARCHICAL LIST DISPLAY. Now say for example user has selected a layout which has been defined for a Hierarchical List display but by mistake he has selected the radio button for a Simple List display. So, here is a mismatch and the program should detect this and throw some error message. Instead it is now displaying a wrong output which is resulting from the mismatch.

Is it possible to store text in a table(colom) without losing the layout

hello,
I have a question and the question is:
Is it possible to store text in a table(colom) without losing the layout?
For the people who don't know what i presicly mean i will explain my question:
Think of a memo field, i write a memo with bij example word or an internal editor of oracle, and if i wan't to store it in a colom with out losing the layout wich datatype for the colom should i use(if this is posibble).
So when i whant to review the memo it has the same layout as when i wrote the memo.
I hope someone can help me,
thanks by regards,
Menno

Is your text field ("memo field") containing only text
(ie of type VARCHAR2 or CLOB) ?
If so, it should preserve your line returns and spaces.

BUS???? for Bid Invitation

hi experts
is there someone who knows what is the number of BUS for Bid Invitation?
Inside BBP_PD i cannot find it.
Thanks
regards
andrea

Hi,
BUS2200
Kind regards,
Yann

Alert for Bid Invitation

Hello Folks,
We have a requirement were alerts needs to be sent to Bidder i.e. 24 hours before the deadline (time/limit) as maintained under Bid Invitation.
For this the following configuration is doneu2026
Maintain the event and event schema for Bid Invitation (BUS2200). Under Event schema you specify the triggering event: No Bid Submitted, Published_Again etc. and also the deadline value.
Then assign this event schema to transaction type Bid Invitation.
Then maintain the Alert category SRM_BID_INV for Bid invitation here you specify the recipient either fixed one or role specific.
Currently the triggering event set is No Bid Submitted for alert category SRM_BID_INV and the deadline value is minus 24.
Issue 1:
When a Bid Invitation already published, reaches its deadline limit i.e. 24 hours before the deadline limit. System should trigger alert and notify bidder that only 24 hours remaining to react hence please submit the bid.
Currently this alert is not getting triggered for the deadline. Does it have something to do with Negative Deadline value?
Issue 2:
A new triggering event u201CPublish againu201D was set with deadline value Zerou201D0u201D.
Now when a bid Invitation was published again system sends alerts to the Bidder notifying of the changes which is correct.
But then system is sending the same alert thrice. How can we control this so that only one alert is sent per Object ID.?
Issue 3:
As specified earlier we had set up the recipient for Alert Category either on a fixed basis or role specific.
As a result of this every alert for Bid Invitation is routing to the same list of recipients.
Wanted to know, is there any other way apart from implementing Badi or setting rules to determine the recipient at runtime for a particular Bid invitation.Only these recipients should be notified via alert.
Awaiting for your response.
Thanks & Regards,
Yatin

rawat may be useful for you
Bidder Alert Notifications By Ramakrishna Rallapalli
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/SRM/Blogs
br
muthu

Web Interface - "Execute function before displaying the layout" issue

Hi Experts,
In my project we have converted some BPS planning folder to Web interface. The steps are as below:
1) Open the BPS planning folder using upspm. Copy the web interface as Web Enabled folder.
2) Generate the web interface by clicking on go to --> Generate web interface
3) Run transaction bps_wb. Open the web interface. Then generate web interface again
4) Run the web interface by clicking on 'Display perview'
5) In the web interface there are some some functions which get executed before displaying the layout.
6) For such functions, push button gets created.
7) I have set the visible property of such push button as false.
8) Most of the time, when I am running the web interface, it
is getting executed successfully.
9) Some times, the web interface is not displaying the layouts successfully.In such cases I have observed that "Execute function before displaying the layout" is not working. Due to this some values like Fiscal Year is not getting set. So, the layout is not getting displayed.
10) I understand that it may be due to compilation error.
For example, I might have made some changes in the web interface. It must be saved and web interface must be regenerated before I diplay the interface again. Can you please help me in understanding the reason of this problem.
11) Can you please help me understand the cause of point no 9. Is it a non-issue? What may be the reason that "Execute function before displaying the layout" does not work every time.
Thanks

Will a function that runs, before the data gets saved, work for you? You can configure such a function to run before the save command behind the save button you create in the planning application.

Is update not approved for a specific group via powershell.

My apologies in advance for asking a similar question to the one I asked two months ago,
is update approved for specific group via powershell? I thought I had this covered, but as I've found time to continue to work on this project I see that it does not.
I have a script that iterates through updates and if the release date is older than 30 days and they have not already been “Approved for Install” or “Approved for Removal” for a specific group it approves them. I am currently faced with the dilemma that
when an update is set to “Not Approved” for the specific group I’m working on it does not come across in my group’s approvals and there for I cannot detect its current state to know if I should approve it. In other words, I don’t want to approve an update
that I set to not approved for a specific group.
I am currently achieving all this so far by connecting to my WSUS server and getting any and all updates via $all = $wsus.GetUpdates(). I Then get my group’s approved updates via $groupApproved = $wsus.GetUpdateApprovals($GroupScope) where ApprovedStates
= "Any" and ApprovedComputerTargetGroups.Add($current_wsus_group). While iterating through $all I grab updates that are older than 30 days and check to see if the updateID exists in my $groupApproved. If it does not, I approve the update. Like I
said before, an explicitly unapproved update for my group does not show up in my $groupApproved. I understand it’s because of my GetUpdateApprovals($GroupScope) being just that and only getting approved for install or uninstall, but even when I try to simply
GetUpdates($GroupScope) I am still not returned explicitly unapproved updates. Below is a screen shot of what I mean by explicitly setting an update to unapproved for a group. I’ve read up on
ApprovedStates and possible enumerated values and it does include "NotApproved" defined as "Includes updates that have not been approved or declined.".
Hope all that makes sense, thanks for the help.

So, I've decided to go about this a different way. Rather than getting all updates and comparing them to approvals via a scope of updates for my specific group (which includes all actions but Not Approved), I am going to look at specific approvals for each
update and see if there is a match for my group. A simplfied version of this is below.
$AnyAllUpdates = $wsus.GetUpdates()
foreach ($udpate in $AnyAllUpdates)
if ($update IsNOTDeclined IsNOTSuperseded LegacyNameNOTIA64 CreationDateLTDATE yada yada yada)
# get the approvals for this udpate as they relate to my group
$uApprovals = $update.GetUpdateApprovals() | ?{$_.ComputerTargetGroupId -eq $wsus_group.Id}
if ($uApprovals)
if ($uApprovals.action -eq "Install")
# do nothing, the udpate was approved for install
elseif ($uApprovals.action -eq "Uninstall")
# do nothing, the update was approved for uninstall
elseif ($uApprovals.action -eq "NotApproved")
# do nothing, the udpate was not approved for install
else
# since there was no specific action then it must be an inherited not approved from teh parent group
# approve the update!

Approved for Everyday Amex!

After getting approved tonight for Barclays (finally) after apping for the 4th time, I felt very lucky and decided to app a bit early to get my foot in the door with Amex. I decided upon the Everyday card, as I have read that it seems to be the most lenient and easiest to get approved for. Completed the app and approved for $2000 initial starting limit! Already set up the online account and got a taste of the great customer service via the chat function. I'm assuming I can ask for a cli increase after 60 days? What about product change to move up to the Blue cash at some point? Since this is my first Amex account, if anybody has any great advice for me on what to take advantage of, please let me know. Thanks to everyone for all of your help over the past 2.5 years!

CAPTOOL wrote:
Debit2Cash wrote:
I would say that you may want to wait to do a CLI right off the bat if it is your first AMEX. I did it when I got my first AMEX and they denied me saying I was too new to American Express. I think it may apply for people who already had an AMEX and ask for an increase right away.Lots of first time cardholders get the CLI right away. The too new to Amex is just an excuse they whip out when they don't think the profile is strong enough to support an increase at that time.I'll let you guys know in a couple months what happens with the cli.

The user approver name doen't show for BID approved

Hi experts.
Anybody knows can I solve my problem?
After I acepted a BID the Approver name appear in the preview, however, after the user approve the BID his name doen't show.
How can I check it?
Is there a report that shows who approved a bid?
Thanks.
Paulo Afonso Cordeiro

Hi Dinesh,
About this data in BBP_PD.
Node ID Agent User State Workitem Created at Finished at Description
At first time, before approval gets the name who will approve.
In the second moment, after BID approver this his name disaeared.
I thought the issue was my BADI implementation, but even with standard doen't work corretally.
Thanks.

Approval for Vendor Bid

Hi All,
I have activated "WS79000010"- No approval required for vendor bid and maintained the required start conditions for this workflow, but when the vendor submits the bids the system throws an error that " No approval workflow found. Inform system administrator".
We are using SRM 5.0 with SP09
Any inputs on this issue are highly appreciated.

Hi,
Please check your starting conditions.There seems to be some problem with that as the system is unable to identify the workflow to be triggered.
Also see teh foll note and related threads for more pointers;
Note 865269 - Bid: Incorrect workflows, incorrect approval preview
Re: Err "No workflow found" while creating bid
Re: URGENT : Workflow for Vendor Bid
Re: Urgent: Quotation Workflow: Message Approval WF is ambiguou
BR,
Disha.
<b>Pls reward points for useful answers.</b>

Approval WF for Bid Invitations

Hi,
Is it possible to setup approvals for publishing Bid Invitations? We only see one WF (79000006 - One-Step Approval of Bid Invitation). We tried and it did not trigger a approval step. Appreciate any suggestions on how to setup approvals for Bid Invitations.
We are using SRM 4 with Classic Scenario.
Regards,
Ashwani

have you activated the workflow?
(indicated by green button.)
in the beginning try using simple start condition
e.g.
&_EVT_CREATION_DATE& >= 01.01.2008
also remove any currency if it is there in SWB_COND for sub WF
BR
Dinesh

WS14500028 BADI WF for Bid Invitation: No workitem is sent to the inbox

Hi All,
I was tasked to troubleshoot the existing workflow of the client. The workflow was able to determine the approver who will receive the workitem for his/her approval. However, the workitem is not seen in his inbox. Since there has been no workitem passed on to the approver's inbox, the workflow stays hanging and the document could not be converted to PO and Confirmation.
What do you think may cause the problem? Does it also involve the implemented BADI? Does the BADI only determine the approver or does it also control the workitem to be passed to the approver?
Please let me know your recommendations and suggestions to this problem.
I'll generously reward points for helpful answers.
Kindest regards,
Reymar

Hi Masa,
How are you?
I think I've met you before here in the Philippines (I just started learning workflow that time).
I was able to do those steps. However, the log says that the BADI WF for BID Invitation No. xxxx, GUID xxx has a waiting status and there is no icon present under the agent column.
What do you think is the problem?
Thanks for your response.
Regards,
Reymar
Edited by: Reymar Ellazo on Mar 12, 2008 11:57 AM

Custom layout for Bid comparison..

Hi all,
For a bid invitation, we can see a Compare button, which when clicked gives a comparison of all the bids submitted for that Bid Invitation.
But our customer wants a custom Bid Comparison form(layout) to be called in a format required by them, when the Compare button is clicked.
Is it possible to call a custom smartform on the button click?? If so, how do i achieve it??
Desperately looking for your help on this.
Thanks in advance,
Kayal

Hi,
Creating a layout for any report is very easy.
Go to TCODE FBL1N, in the output screen, below the menu options, you will find few buttons. you will find the button select layout, click on any one layout, and then click on the button select fields and copy the hidden fields from the select fields option, add the fields you wish to add and then save the layout with a new name. Or you can also go through menu options - Settings ==> Special Fields - Include your special fields from the available tables. (This is cross client configuraiton)
hope this helps
regards,
radhika

The layout of approval for bid

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for