Third-Party Remittance - ECC 6.0 - After Support Packs 19 & 20

We have recently applied HRSPs 19 and 20 to our DEV and QAS invironments in ECC 6.0.  Our Sandbox environment is only up to HRSP 18.  When we run Third-Party Reminttance in the sandbox it works fine.  When we run it in our DEV or QAS environments we get the following errors:
    Account with the following search key was not found: 0010HRK        
    Internal error when defining the account for search key 0010HRK     
We have never had any configuration in HRK (Assign Vendor Accounts under Posting to Financial Accounting), and we still don't in any of our environments.
Has anyone had the same problem or heard of any issues with HRSPs 19 or 20?
Thanks,
Mary

We applied OSS note 1080255.  This fixed our problem.

Similar Messages

  • Anyone else having issues with third party changers saying "this accessory not supported". I get it every time I plug my phone. It only started after the iOS 7 updates

    Anyone else having issues with third party changers saying "this accessory not supported". I get it every time I plug my phone. It only started after the iOS 7 update?

    That's because part of iOS7 had code in it to look for and recognize unsigned cables.
    In other words, Apple knew that people used non-signed ones and didn't care....until last month when they decided to care. People with iOS6 and lower should experience no issues (unless Apple patches those iOS versions) but folks with iOS7 will need to deal with it.

  • Third party remittance issue - no documents created

    hi All,
    When I am excuting Third party remittance for an employee I am getting status as: Evaluated! no documents created. When I checked in PCP0, the document is created. After checking the status in PCP0 I am executing 3rd party payroll and below log is displayed:
    Remittance evaluation run 9999999999
    Status                                   Evaluated ! No documents created
    Personnel number selected: 1
    Personnel number evaluated 1
    personnel number rejected 0
    personnel number skipped 0
    Number of errors 0
    No of warnings  0
    Can an one please help me on this issue.  
    Thanks,
    Sai

    hi Michael,
    The employee payroll has been successful. Post payroll execution we have done FI Posting and document has been created for the posting which we have checked through PCP0.
    Can you please help on this issue.
    Thanks,
    Sai

  • Third party remittance simulation document

    Hi Guys,
    When i open third party remittance simulation posting document in PCP0 and when double click on vendor to see the details of payments it shows me following error.
    "An explanation of some or all document lines is not possible".
    Here is the detail explanation:
    iagnosis
       The system cannot explain one or all document lines of this selection.
    rocedure
       This problem can be caused by either:
       o   A document line item being incomplete. For more information, see the
           error explanation.
       o   The posting run having been created before the remittance
           functionality supported "detailed info on TP runs". In this case,
           the system will not be able to show the selection correctly. As a
           result, the displayed items may not add up to the total sum of the
           selected items.
    We have selected the data on employee level on the config level.
    On PRD posting, we can see the detailed item.
    What could be the reason?
    Mayuresh

    Hi Mayuresh,
    I am also receiving this error message.  Were you able to view the simulation document?
    Is it missing any authorization objects?
    Thank you.
    Lynn

  • Correct third party remittance with a status of 50

    How can I correct a third party remittance run with a status of 50?  It looks like the run was created from an off-cycle payroll but it won't post because it has a status of '50'.
    thanks,

    After off-cycle you have to post the document, once posted the status becomes '50', then you can do your third party evaluations.
    - Aby
    Edited by: aby on Mar 30, 2010 10:57 PM

  • Third Party Remittance Process

    Hi All,
    Wage type '/484' is a technical wage type used for one of the taxes in the US.  Our client just started using this tax type for a new tax for the state of New York.  SAP has the tax wage types set to post in third-party remittance by default, even though we do not use third-party remittance for taxes (we only use third-party remittance for garnishments).
    To avoid using Third Party Remittance I have changed the processing class 78 value for '/484' from u201C2u201D to BLANK.  So that this will stop it from being included in the third-party remittance process.
    Actually, I have not worked much on this Remittance process. I have made changes in Development system but have not transported them to quality.
    But, I want to know how would i test it. I need to test in two scenario's:
    1. Testing in quality so that i can see remittance happening (When Processing Class '78' value is '2').
    2. Testing again in quality how remittance is getting stopped for Wage Type '/484' (When Processing Class '78' value is '0').
    So, basically I want to know how we can check (verify) for remittance happening in the system for a particular Wage Type.
    Regards,
    Avinash

    transaction:  PC00_M10_U500
    This transaction runs the payroll driver (the same one that we run payroll with, program RPCALCU0).  It defaults to the schema u201CU500u201D.  Use this standard schema if no custom specific modifications are done.
    The testing for this is to run the third-party remittance process and verify that the error no longer occurs for an employee with wage type /484.

  • Third party remittance Error

    Hi
    While running the third party remittance program PC00_M99_URME - Evaluate remittance (New)
    I am getting the error "No entry in table T51RK for key 00000"   There is no remittance rule 00000 which I have defined. Nor this entry is present in the table.  but I am getting the message
    THere is one more messga e which I am getting "No entry in table 3 for key 90000001 20.06.2008"
    This 90000001 entry is in the HR payee table but this entry is not linked to any of my vendor or wage types. when I delete this entry I still get this message.
    Any clue ?? Is there a note ?

    It sounds like you have the wage type tied to third-party remittance via table T512W, processing classes 73 and 78.  Do you want this wage type to remit and it is generating an error or are you getting the error and do not intend to remit?

  • Third Party Remittance Posting RUN : Information regarding particular BA Mi

    Hi Guys,
    While posting to FI for Third Party Remittance Posting RUN (standard sap Program RPURMPK0), when the selection for Business Area is left blank, the o/p gets Posted Properly for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank) and for all the other Business Area that is valid for the pay run.  But the Information that is displayed in the output is only  for Business Area = ___(i.e. blank).
    If the other applicable Business Area  ( = 01 suppose) is there in this pay, it gets posted properly, but the information is not displayed.
    Can u guys let me know how to get read of the diplay problem???
    Thanks in advance
    Jay Gandhi

    Hi Guys,
    This is the problem in the coding of SAP Program itself. I have copied it to Z Program and have made the changes, it works properly now.
    Have also notified SAP OSS .
    Jay Gandhi

  • Third Party Remittance config for Canada

    I have a requirement as follows:
    Third Party Remittance programs are to be available for use by Canada.
    When executing program PC00_M07_K500 we get the below error message
    Entry notfound for wage type: /102
    Business number : XXXXXXXXX and prov. of employment:
    Please check table T5KRC.
    Can someone help me out with the steps to configure TPR for CAnada? I've searched everywhere but cannot find a config guide?

    I got the answer. I tested with changing the processing class it's working fine without any issues.

  • Third Party Remittance Document Numbers

    Hi All,
    Client would like separate document numbers per vendor in the third party remittance posting. Currently one document number has several vendors. Does anyone know how to accomplish this?
    Thanks,
    Marlo

    Hi Mayuresh,
    I am also receiving this error message.  Were you able to view the simulation document?
    Is it missing any authorization objects?
    Thank you.
    Lynn

  • Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance

    Dear all,
    Could anyone please explain me about this concept : "Customization of HR Payee for third party remittance"?
    What this actually means and what we do in it?
    Thank you all in advance.
    Regards,
    Mamta

    hi mamta,
    this mainly decides how you pay the third parties through payroll.
    here you have to create HR payees for the third party vendors.
    then you setup the assignment of the WT to the HR payees.
    then you take the information of the G/L accounts and also others details like which G/L account is for which third party vendor from the FI people. then depending on that information you then setup the assignment of the HR payees to their respective G/L accounts.
    here you also have to decide when these payments has to be made to these third party providers.
    you enter the HR payees numbers in table T51RH.
    this is just an overview of configuration of Third party Remittance.
    reward points if it is helpful
    regards,
    salman

  • Facing a problem to run the garnishment  for third party remittances

    Hi All,
    When we try create a posting run using Progrm RPURMP00  for garnishment  for third party remittances. We got an error messages as   PERNO. ...... no link to payroll results.
    Thanks,
    -suresh

    Did you carry out the following two activities?
    1. The payroll run, the evaluation run and the store evaluation run must have been completed before you can remit anything.
    2. Tables T51RL, T51RC, T51RH and T51RD must be maintained.

  • Deploying manually CC PKG file built with CC Packager. Not using any third party deployment tool. However after each 5 installations, the PKG files corrupt and cannot be use for a 6th installation. I have to build a new PKG file using CC packager.  Why ?

    Deploying manually CC PKG file built with CC Packager. Not using any third party deployment tool. However after each 5 installations, the PKG files corrupt and cannot be use for a 6th installation. I have to build a new PKG file using CC packager.  Why ?

    http://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/packager.html
    http://forums.adobe.com/community/download_install_setup/creative_suite_enterprise_deploym ent

  • Will upgrading to OS X Maverics require me to reinstall any third party softwar i.e photoshop, after effects etc.

    Will upgrading to OS X Maverics require me to reinstall any third party softwar i.e photoshop, after effects etc.

    Wait for testing.
    Do your own testing. Clone your system first.
    Do a clean install of 10.9 on another drive and then use that with Setup Assistant or Migration Assistant if you want.
    I would not update over the old system - at least not w/o a safety backup net to catch you.
    There are always a couple things that need fixing. And it may be that they won't know until they have the final bits and do their own inhouse testing now that they have the actual release version.

  • What are the key components to be mointored after support pack installation

    I m an PI developer ,last Friday Basis installed the service pack 15 in Quality box . They are asking me to mointor the QPI to make sure everything is running fine and let them know so they can install the service pack in Production box.
    Apart from normal monitoring of the system ( RWB and SXMB* ), what are the other components i need to monitor.
    Can you tell me what to be monitored after Support pack installation.

    Hi,
    1) If CCMS is configured then you can monitor this as well (RZ20)
    2) Keep an eye on Queues
    Regards,
    I m an PI developer ,last Friday Basis installed the service pack 15 in Quality box . They are asking me to mointor the QPI to make sure everything is running fine and let them know so they can install the service pack in Production box.
    Apart from normal monitoring of the system ( RWB and SXMB* ), what are the other components i need to monitor.
    Can you tell me what to be monitored after Support pack installation.

Maybe you are looking for

  • Diff b/w occurs 0 and 1

    hi, what is the difference b/w occurs 0 and occurs 1? and what is the significance of begin of?

  • How should i log out from my existing i phone frome i cloud

    i have got a new iphone and wanna logout from old one with all the data in it.i want to remove all data to my new iphone.

  • SAP GUI Scripting Wizzard Windows7 does not work

    Dear Experts, I am quite a novice when it comes to SAP GUI scripting (let alone any other development), therefore my question might be rather stupid. After my PC was migrated from XP to Windows 7 it is no longer possible to use the SAP GUI scripting

  • Who to contact?

    Hi, I bought Creative Suite CS5.5 Master collection, Student Version (for my daughter). I provided the Academic Proof on the 2nd December (Friday), which they acknowledge and asked for the product code. The code was given to Adobe on the 5th December

  • JScrollPane policy

    I have a GuiPanel which I add to a JScrollPane policy. If I have the following (where p is my GuiPanel): add(new JScrollPane(p)) The vertical scroll bar never appears. If I have: add(new JScrollPane(p,JScrollPane.VERTICAL_SCROLLBAR_AS_NEEDED,JScrollP