Transaction to execute an invoice verification

Hi all,
can any one please say me Which is the proper transaction  to execute an invoice verification ( Evaluated receipt settlement or ERS) and how is that executed through that particular transaction.
                Regards,
      Cheenangshuk das
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Feb 27, 2008 4:10 PM

Hi,
If you got the Output type, driver program and name of the the form, then you can go to T-Code NACE to attach the driver pgm/form routine and form name against a Output type.
You should also know the application in NACE. I think it should be MR.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
JLN

Similar Messages

  • Assign a number range to the transaction in Logistics Invoice Verification

    Hi Experts,
    There are two transaction types (RS and RD) in Logistics Invoice Verification.  We have assigned number range 01 to them.
    Is it possible to assign multiple number range to a transaction type in Logistics Invoice Verification? If yes, how to do it?
    Is it possible to create other transaction types? If yes, how to do it, and any risk?
    Appreciate your advices. Thanks.
    regards,
    April

    Hi April,
    Im afraid it is not possible to set more than one number range to a transaction/document
    type. To create different transaction/document types you can do this in transaction OBA7.
    Then to set what default document types are used in a transaction you can set this in OMR4.
    There should be no risk in creating extra document types as long as the description of each
    one you create is clearly documented. For more info on number range assignment check out
    notes 452127, 193020 and 62077.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards,
    Adam.

  • Downpayment Clearing in Logistic Invoice verification

    Hi All,
    we have activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P " and
    Switch "MM_SFWS_CI_01 - Enhanced Functions in EhP4 for Applications in
    Materials Management" using Tcode SFW1. And followed all instructions
    documented when activated Business Function " LOG_MMFI_P2P ". The
    Busines function is activated to order to clear downpayments at the
    time of invoice posting in MIRO or MIR7. When I post the invoice in
    MIRO system is posting 2 indepedent document as below.
    1. Invoice posting,
    Dr GR/IR
    Cr Vendor
    2. Downpayment Recovery
    Dr Vendor
    Cr Vendor with SP GL Indicator "C"
    My point is, as per the link
    http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/48/b42c22e8603095e10000000a421937/frameset.htm, it says "You can use the Down Payment Clearing
    function to clear down payments that you have posted with reference to
    a purchase order without going to the relevant financial accounting
    transactions, directly in logistics invoice verification."
    But, in my case, the system is not clearing the downpayment but instead
    is just posting a Credit memo account entry with SP GL indicator (refer
    to th Downpayment Entry).
    Please advice if SAP is designed to clear the downpayment in LIV or
    just to post the downpayment recovery entry.
    If advice on any corrections to be applied.
    Best regards
    Abishay Solomon

    Hi
    I am not sure, but as per your link
    "The system displays the Down Payment Clearing pushbutton at header level"
    are you getting any button there?
    Regards
    Kailas Ugale

  • Work flow for invoice verification

    I would like to know how to find out/display the workflow related to MIRO transaction code, miro is invoice verification, how to find the z table created for this workflow.
    given a work flow template number, how to view this template
    thanks

    Hello,
    For MIRO the associated :
    1) BOR : BUS2081
    2) Workflow : WS20001004
    Can you elaborate your requirement on z table?
    If i have correctly understood your requirement :
    To display the workflow template, run Tcode SWDD or
    PFTC, select WS Workflow Template and give the workflow number without the prefix 'WS'
    To make sure the Workflow is triggered, make sure the entry SWETYPV.
    Run SWELS, and switch on Trace.
    Run TCode : MIRO and check in SWEL, to make sure the Workflow has triggered without errors.
    To start with, i hope this helps...
    Cheers,
    Remi

  • PO block in vendors invoice verification

    Hi all,
    whenever we execute an invoice verification selecting by vendor, any PO of this vendor results blocked for modification .
    Even if we de-select the position, ALL PO are blocked.
    Is there any way round this, still using the vendor for Invoice verification ? (we usually have a very long list of PO so the vendor is a really good parameter)
    Thanks a lot in advance
    Cheers
    Aude

    duplicated

  • Print out put of Invoice Verification

    How to get print output of Invoice verification? How to get print output of  subsequent credit/debit of Invoice?

    Hi
    You need to create a new Message type copying any relevant message type.(tCode M806). Maintain the processing routines  with medium as print out put.
    Create  the form required for Print out put & assign it to the routine.
    Maintain the message schemas , Assign the new Message type to the existing schema.
    Now create the conditoin record using transaction MRM1 with th required key combination. Invoicing party & Company code.
    Now when ever you create the invcoie with combination the Message will be created.
    Execute transaction MR90 for the print out put. If you want the print after saving the invoice , maintain the despatch time as Send immediately when saving the application.
    Reward points if useful
    Thanks & Regards
    Kishore

  • Reg:Assignment test in Invoice Verification

    Hi,
           We are doing upgrade from 4.6C to ECC6.0.When I checked the delta functionality,SAP has explained the functionality as shown below.Is it a transaction or Program?Please give me the details.
    "You can use the assignment test in the logistics invoice verification. The assignment text is a process step preceding the invoice verification in background processing. The software checks cyclically whether an open goods receipt exists for the invoices entered in background processing. The software begins the invoice verification only when open goods receipts exist for an invoice. Effects on system administration are characterized as follows: the assignment test should be called in background processing before the report for the invoice verification, because the assignment test helps create the worklist for background processing. An assignment test is faster than a complete invoice verification in background processing, inasmuch as the software does not have to process as much data from the database and does not have to execute as many checks and reports. In addition, the software does not execute full assignment of the open goods receipts as in background processing; it executes only basic assignment"
    Thanks&Regards
    Venkadesh

    Hi,
    As per requirement we need to make settings for Assignment test for LIV.
    Has anyone can explain how it works and what settings we need to carry out.
    Thanks

  • Excise Duty (IS-OIL) - Invoice verification and accounting ED

    Hello experts,
    I have a case in my importation process with excise duty (IS-OIL). I have the following scenario: Purchasing Ed free material and receive it in ED paid Storage Location. So I use Handling type 00 and Valuation type TAX in the PO excise duty item data. I woul like to kwon Which is the standard process for the invoice verification of the excise duty cost when the handling type is 00 and the valuation type TAX?. And How can I do the invoice verification (MIRO) if there is not a specific line in the purchase order history for the excise duty cost?
    I have another case in the accounting of movement type 301 (transfer posting between 2 plants). The accounting posting is the following:
    Examle:
    Account                       Transaction
    1. STOCK FUEL          S                    BSX (Stock account)
    2. STOCK FUEL            H             BSX (Stock account)
    3. STOCK EXCISE DUTY     S             SVO (ED Account)
    4. EXCISE DUTY FUEL           H             ZZP (ED Account)     
    The problem is that the 4th account must be STOCK EXCISE DUTY ACCOUNT from SVO transaction.
    I would be grateful if someone could help me with these cases.
    Thank in advance.
    Pablo

    Dear Prashant,
    Thanks for reply, but i checked my excise cond types, in all conditions, cond cat is blank & cond class 'A' is maintained i.e. Discount & Surcharge.
    My problem is that, my excise value is not got posted in net receivable value in accounts. This problem arise, when we make sales order, Net Value field doesn't pick excise there & while invoicing, it post only the base value & rounding off adjustments at header level. I don't know, from where this Net Value field in sales order is picking the value but my problem will solve if my grand total value(base valueexciseedu cess+higher edu cess) will pass to Net Value field while making sales order. Kindly help.

  • GR/IR Freight Clearing Account - GR & Invoice Verification

    Dear Gurus,
    I have made a PO for 1200 pcs unit price 69.20$.  (GR based IV).   (Valuation - Moving average price)
    Delivery costs - Freight (FRB1) - 1200$
    I have splitted the PO quantity in to 3 different Inbound deliveries
    Inbound 1 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 2 - 400 pcs
    Inbound 3 - 400 pcs
    I have made the Goods receipt for the 1st Inbound - 400 pcs.
    Goods Receipt 1 - 400 pcs.  The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification1 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice verification is 1000$.
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c debited by 1000$
    Goods Receipt2 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 400$
    Invoice Verification2 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 2000$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 200$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1800$
    Goods Receipt3 - 400 pcs. The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got credited by 200$
    Invoice Verification3 - 400 pcs. The value in the Invoice Verification is 1500$
    The value in the GR/IR freight clearing a/c got debited by 133.33$ and Stock in Hand debited by 1366.67$
    I don't understand how the logic works for seggreating the amount to GR/IR freight clearing account and GR/IR account.
    For the first 2 GR and IV I could understand that there is a  balance in the PO condition but for the Invoice verification 3. The value debited to GR/IR freight account is 133.33$. Can anyone help me how the calculation is taking place and how the system has arrived to figure 133.33$ in the Invoice verification for GR/IR freight clearing a/c
    Strangely when I have cancelled the Invoice Verification document 3.
    The value Credited to GR/IR freight clearing account is 333.33$ instead of 133.33$
    Can somebody help me to figure out the calucation for IR after the GR for planned delivery costs.
    If any SAP notes or help files can be provided then it would be really helpful.
    Regards
    Fazal.

    Refer this note 311496 & 460244, 129066
    Symptom
    Delivery costs were planned for a purchase order item.
    A goods-receipt-based invoice verification is set.
    Several goods receipts are posted. For invoice entry, both in conventional invoice verification (transaction MR01/MRHR) and in logistics invoice verification (transaction MR1M/MIRO), the delivery costs for each purchase order item are displayed in total.
      This is the same as when, for example, only one of several GR documents/delivery notes is selected.
    Example of a purchase order history:
    Cat. Doc. no.    Itm    MvT Pstg.dt.            Qty.in BUoM       Value in local curr
    GR   5200002605 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    GR   5200002606 0001 101 June 16, 2000      5  PC         50,00 DEM
    Sum of goods receipts                      10  PC        100,00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002605 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           3,33 DEM
    DCGR 5200002606 0001     June 16, 2000       5  PC           5.00 DEM
    Total delivery cost GR                                                 16,66 DEM
    If you only select the first GR document in the selection, you get
    the following default values for the delivery costs:
    Amount    Quantity  BUoM Itm  Decription              Vendor
    6,67         10      PC  10    Freight value        VEND01
    10,00        10      PC  10    Freight/quantity     VEND01
    (and not, as sometimes expected: -  3,33 DEM    5 PC
                                        -  5,00 DEM    5 PC)
    Other terms
    WEBRE, delivery costs, planned delivery costs, goods-receipt-based invoice verification, invoice verification
    Reason and Prerequisites
    A function such as the goods-receipt-based invoice verification is not available for delivery costs.
    Solution
    This is not an error; this is a consulting note.

  • Invoice verification is not posted with T.Code MIRO

    Hi Friends,
    1)
    I created a purchase order with T.Code: ME21N, and Enter Goods Receipts with T.Code: MIGO after that Invoice verification with T.Code:MIRO, but it is not posted:
    Error Message is: Error in account determination: Table T030K Co.Code: RK01 VST.
    2)
    Balance not zero 5000, debits 5000, credits 10000
    for the second purchase order step 1 repeated.
    Please help inthis regard,
    thanks
    ramesh.

    Hi,
    I think there might be some configuration missing with regard to the tax.
    You ahve assign a GL account ot the TAX code for the Transaction Key VST.
    Menu Path: SPRO - > Financial  Accounting - > Financial  Accounting Global Settings - > Tax on Sales/Purchases- > Posting - > Define Tax accounts .
    Thakns
    kiran

  • EDI - Incoming Invoice Error and GR based Invoice Verification - 51 No GR

    Hi,
    We are implementing EDI for incoming invoices and use Goods Receipts based Invoice Verification.  When processing an inbound IDOC Invoice (type INVOIC01) where the Goods Receipt has not yet been posted, then Inbound IDOC is siiting at Error Status, 51 - No GR documents found.
    Is there any way we can process this as a Parked Invoice or for Verification in the background (MIRA)?  because the current situation is a problem, as 95% of our Inbound Invoices will be received electronically before the Goods are Received. 
    The actual Vendor's delivery note is stored in the segment E1EDP02 (Qualifier 016), field BELNR.
    Currently the IDOC as to sit in error until the Vendor's Delivery Note is Goods Receipted which can be several days later - SAP OSS Note 393883 fro 2001 suggests doing this, but surely this is a common situation.  The IDOC sitting in error in WE02 in the list of IDOCs is difficult to isolate from true errors.
    If this is was mnaul Invoice it could be processed through MIRA for background Invoice Verification later with program RMBABG00.
    We havd SAP version ECC 6.0
    I have spotted OSS Note 501524 which implies that is possible automatically Park Incoming EDI IDOC Invoices, has anyone tried this?  and what would be the transaction/program that could be used to post several at once when the GR has been processed (similar to RMBABG00)

    Hi ,
    You can use the program   RBDMANI2   which will reprocess all the IDOCs (EDIinvoices )that have failed . You can schedule this program in the background and it will post all failed invoices which have the GR posted later .
    We had the same scenario and we have scheduled this program as a daily job at night .
    Regards,
    Hari.

  • Same nr range in Invoice Verification (MIRO) and FI document

    Dear all can you please help to solve this issue?
    We would like to have the same number range for invoice verification and for financial document, what we have to do?
    Regards
    Marco

    Please follow the steps as below
    Step 1. Maintain FI document number range. Use transaction OMR4 and go to Number range for document types in FI. Select the company code for which you want to create the new number range interval and click on the change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert interval button on top of the screen.for example, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 – 5299999999. Don't forget to set the external number range check box (Ext).
    Step 2. Assign FI number range to FI document types. The second step is to assign the number range created in step 1 to the FI document type for invoices. Again use transaction OMR4 and go to Document type. Double-click on the document type, which you are using for LIV invoices. In my example, I used the SAP standard document type RE. In the number range field, assign the new number range interval 52
    Step 3. Maintain MM document number ranges. Use transaction OMRJ and click on change interval button. Insert a new document number range by clicking on the insert button at the top of the screen. For MM documents, I created number range interval 52 with the document numbers 5200000000 – 5299999999. For the internal number range assignment, do not set the external number range check box (Ext).
    Step 4. Update MM number range assignment. The last step is to assign the MM number range to your MM transaction via IMG menu path Materials Management>Logistics Invoice Verification>Incoming Invoice>Number Assignment>Maintain Number Assignments for Logistic Documents>Transaction – Assign Number ranges. Two transactions are available. LIV contains the following two internal transactions that are used for the MM document number determination:
    RD: manual invoice entry (MIRO)
    RS: cancel, reverse invoice (MR8M), evaluated receipt settlement (MRRL), EDI invoice receipt, invoicing plan (MRIS), and revaluation (MRNB).
    You need to update the number range interval for transaction RD.
    hope now that things r clear
    reward accordingly

  • Moving average price variance in Invoice verification

    Hello,
    I set in sys that the moving average of price variance will be check in tolerance of x% (lower & upper limit) BUT the system ignore it , when I save an Invoice (MIRO) with price that change the moving average price for more than X% the invoice was saved with no W/E massage . I set all massages that seams to be relevant with E but nothing was happened .
    What is the way to set the system that in Invoice verification stage it will check the moving average price variance and give an alert or will not let the invoice to be post ???
    Best Regards
    Idit

    Hi,
    You can block Invoices using transaction code OMC0
    (a) Use Tolerancy Key VP for your company code
    (b) Fill-up Lower and Upper check tolerance limit %
    When a stock posting line is created as a result of an invoice item, the system calculates the new moving average price that results from the posting. It compares the percentage variance of the new moving average price to the old price using the percentage tolerance limits defined.
    Bye,
    Muralidhara

  • Invoice Verification MIRO

    Dear All,
    This is about invoice verification block after MIRO posting-
    In PO we have set it as 2 way match, once the PO is equal to Invoice verification then the system should not put any payment block. But if it doesnt match the value of PO to IV then the system should put invoice verifcation block (R) in the accounting document.
    Here, whatever we post that is whether the PO value is matching or not the invoice verification block (R) is appearing in the accounting document. Does any one gone through similar issue....
    I want to know how this can happen?
    Checked validations but nothing that sort appears.....is there a way to find out how this happens....
    Thanks to all in advance.

    Hello
    I do not know of any BAPI. But you can set an automatic block up through your payment terms.
    Check the following customizing path for this:
    Financial Accounting
    ->Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable
       ->Business Transactions
         ->Incoming Invoices/Credit Memos
           ->Maintain Terms of Payment
    Select the details for the payment term and check for the indicator there to set the default block key.
    Hope this helps
    Ray

  • List of PO's where GRN is done and Invoice Verification is not done.

    Gurus,
              Please advice how to get the list of PO's for which Goods receipt is done and Invoice Verification is not done.
    Thanks in Advance,
    Nambi.N

    HI
    In ME2N
    Tool Bar - Edit - Dynamic selections - Select Purchasing document item - Goods receiprt and Invoice receipt.
    Enter values in GR and IV and then execute.
    It will show the PO with GR not IV
    Check it out.
    Regards,
    Raman

Maybe you are looking for

  • Assign dynamic statement in declare block or begin block

    Hi all, For below code, if I assign the select statement in the declare section for corresponding variable, will it improve the performance. For cust_veh_id we have another cursor in declare block, only partial code is provided. What I meant. declare

  • My Iphone was not working, i forgot Apple ID for activate

    Dear Mr/Ms, i was got an iphone from my brother, and i don't know what exactly i have to start. Last day, i try to clear this iphone and create my new (by the way with itunes), and now it ask about the Apple ID and Password with the question: "This i

  • Special Characters in imported HTML

    I've got a Flash piece where the user fills out a questionnaire, and based on their responses, they are shown a handful of recommendations. These recommendations are all separate HTML files that load into a scrolling text field as HTML text. There is

  • HT204266 how do I create an app?

    I want to create an app, so where do I get started?

  • ABAP Webdynpro - onAction Enter not active on last tab control in View

    Ladies and Gentlemen, learned colleagues, I'm developing a WDA application which contains 3 views, the middle one of which is utilising a tabstrip.  With certain fields required to be filled in before continuing, I want to have the application do a f