Transportation costing : costing on header level, item/stage conditions

Hello,
I am hoping that someone can help me with an issue in shipment transportation costing. At present, we would like to cost a number of conditions on the stage level, but have the cost show on the shipment header. The problem I have is that I do not know how to transfer the cost from the item level to the shipment level. The problem I have are
1 The forwarding agent is charging us based on the most expensive tariff zone that we visit. For example, we have a shipment that visit the following tariff zone in the following order (stages)
Delivery 1 Zone 1 30 euros
Delivery 2 Zone 2 50 euros
Delivery 3 Zone 3 - 100 euros
Delivery 4 Zone 2 50 euros
Delivery 5 Zone 1 30 euros
The forwarding agent would charge us 100 euros for the journey. The problem is that on the shipment header level, the system is taking the last visited tariff zone as the journey cost, and not the most expensive. While I could cost it per stage, the calculation is incorrect, as it is 30 + 50 + 100 + 50 + 30 = 260 euros. Is there a way to cost each stage (shipment item) but only transfer the most expensive cost on to the shipment header level and make it valid for costing?
2 Some deliveries will require a special truck, and we are charged extra for this by the forwarding agent. The indicator to use this is captured on a delivery. However, I would like to cost this on the shipment header level, and not on the shipment item level. This is to ensure that it is costed only once per shipment. For example, if we have the following deliveries in a shipment and we are charged an extra 50 euros for the use of a truck with the special equipment, the cost would be
Delivery 1 < - Special equipment
Delivery 2 <- Normal
Delivery 3 < - Special equipment
Delivery 4 <- Normal
Delivery 5 <- Normal
Normal rate + 50 euros, and NOT Normal rate + 50 euro + 50 euros. The problem is that if I cost this on shipment stage / item level, the cost appears twice. Is there anyway to capture the cost in stage level, pass it on to the header only once?
Any ides?

Dear Abdul,
1.What is the basis of tariff is it 100 EUR per which unit of measure. Pls clarify.
2You can cost it at shipment cost item level also at the cal base in condition type. I presume there is one shipment cost item leg for all these deliveries.
Regards,
Jatinder

Similar Messages

OKB9 Cost Center at Header level

SAP Experts
In one of my sub contracting scenario I have assigned cost element in okb9 for multiple business area with the combination of valuation area, no profit centre is assigned. At the time of posting system is asking for co object assignment for the cost element of sub contracting which is assigned in okb9.
When I am assigning a dummy cost centre at header level of okb9, it works fine.
Please tell me the use of header cost centre in case of multiple cost centre assignment in okb9.
Pavan

Hi Pavan,
I hope you know for which material system returns error message i.e. co object assignment required.Go to material master and find that what kind of division they assigned in the material master, Then go to the transaction code OMJ7 find that division has been assigned to your valuation class, business are or not. If they are not assigned please maintain the division against the valuation area and do the process again. I hope your problem will be resolved please assigned the points.Be ensure okb9 settings are correct.
Regards
Maruthi.

What are Header Level, Item Level and Schedule Level data?

Hi ,
Can anyone plz explain me what are Header Level, Item Level and Schedule Level Data in the R/3 system , means what actually is the data structure they contain. If is there any document or links available plz do send. Urgent.
Thanks
Prashant singhal

Hi Prashant,
check this link.
[Extractors;
Regards,
Harold.

Transportation group at delivery header

Dear Friends,
while creating the delivery from some of the plants transportation group not determined at delivery header level, but i can find the same at item level.
Can you please let me know how it gets determined at header level, if there is any specal setting required.
customer is having the shipping condition
Material is having the transportation group
route is determined properly..
the only the proble is transportation zone at delivery header level.
can you treat this one as top prioiry and let me know.
thanks
Raju.

if it there then only it gets determined at the dlivery item level
I know very well this but wanted you to check whether any deletion is made in the meanwhile.
for few of the cases it is working fine
What those few cases are ?? Different delivery type ?? Different Material code ?? You need to analyse this and compare in your system.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
ps: spell the name correctly

OTC . How is freight calculated in OM header level

Hi
We have this business scenario where Freight is calculated at order header.
But we were checking the API for that
WSH_INTERFACE_GRP.Create_Update_Freight_Costs
This is done at Delivery or Delivery detail level.
So CANT we have freight costs at order header level???
Basically i have say 3 labels created for an order i need to generate freight for these 3 labels. Please not 3 labels DOES NOT correspond to 3 lines.
So can i create Freight lines for these 3 labels for that order header Id.
And also another question is for RETURN orders we wont have any deliveries then how are freight cost calculated
Regards
Gibin

FUNCTION ZSAVE_NOTES_SAVE.
*"*"Local interface:
*" IMPORTING
*" VALUE(OBJECT_ID) TYPE CRMT_OBJECT_ID
*" VALUE(OBJECT_TYPE) TYPE CRMT_SUBOBJECT_CATEGORY
*" REFERENCE(HEADER) TYPE THEAD OPTIONAL
*" REFERENCE(TEXT) TYPE TDTXTLINES
*" TABLES
*" LINES STRUCTURE TLINE
TYPES : BEGIN OF STRUC,
GUID TYPE CRMD_ORDERADM_H-GUID,
END OF STRUC.
DATA : WA_STRUC TYPE STRUC,
IT_STRUC LIKE TABLE OF WA_STRUC.
TYPES : BEGIN OF STRUC1,
TDOBJECT TYPE STXH-TDOBJECT,
TDNAME TYPE STXH-TDNAME,
TDID TYPE STXH-TDID,
TDSPRAS TYPE STXH-TDSPRAS,
TDTITLE TYPE STXH-TDTITLE,
TDLINE TYPE STXH-TDTXTLINES,
END OF STRUC1.
DATA : WA_STRUC1 TYPE STRUC1,
IT_STRUC1 LIKE TABLE OF WA_STRUC1.
SELECT SINGLE GUID FROM CRMD_ORDERADM_H INTO WA_STRUC WHERE
OBJECT_ID = OBJECT_ID AND OBJECT_TYPE = OBJECT_TYPE.
SELECT SINGLE TDOBJECT TDNAME TDID TDSPRAS TDTITLE TDTXTLINES FROM STXH
INTO WA_STRUC1 WHERE TDNAME = WA_STRUC-GUID.
APPEND WA_STRUC1 TO IT_STRUC1.
CALL FUNCTION 'SAVE_TEXT'
EXPORTING
CLIENT = SY-MANDT
HEADER = HEADER
INSERT = ' I '
SAVEMODE_DIRECT = ' X '
OWNER_SPECIFIED = ' SAPUSER '
* LOCAL_CAT = ' '
* IMPORTING
* FUNCTION =
* NEWHEADER = HEADER
TABLES
LINES = LINES
EXCEPTIONS
ID = 1
LANGUAGE = 2
NAME = 3
OBJECT = 4
OTHERS = 5
IF SY-SUBRC <> 0.
* MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
* WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
ENDIF.
COMMIT WORK.
ENDFUNCTION.
Have alook at the follolwing threads
Probelem with SAVE_TEXT
SAVE_TEXT FUNCTION MODULE
save_text?
there are many more examples.

Header Level Cash Discount For VBRK-VBELN, Where Can I get?

Hi Experts,
I know the # of VBELN of VF03 (VBRK), now, I need to pull the data of,
1- Header Level Cash Discount - Condition Value and
2 - Header Level Cash Discount - Amount i.e.
% Value.
Normally, I know the procedure is,
(The relationship is )
KONV-KNUMV = VBRK-KNUMV
For all the columns the field KONV-KWERT can be used
But, its ITEM level, where as I am looking for Header Level?
So, Where Can I get the VBRK-KNUMV Header level,
1- Cash Discount Condition Value data? and
2- Cash Discount Amount data i.e. %
Thank you,
Message was edited by:
Srikhar

ThanQ Sheshu,
No, there is no entry in KONV-KNUMH for KSHCL type of Discounts i.e. SKTV. THere r entries i.e. record #s for Pricing matters! I dont know Y?
So, It seems to b, I hv to use the follwoing code,
at new knumv
SUM (of types KONV-KSHCL = SKTV)
endat.
Or Do u hv any other clue? like, other tables searching?
anyways, thanq

Condition at Header Level

Dear all,
Following is my requirement.
My condition (ZPPV)is at both header& item level (In M/06, header & item level condition check boxes are ticked).
My client requirement is if at header level, I enter condition amount say $ 50 & that perticular purchase order is having 7 line items, $50 should get equally divided to each line item i.e.( 50/7= $7.14).
Please tell me which setting should I do for it?
Best Regards,
Shailendra
Edited by: Shailendra Sabale on Jun 15, 2010 4:03 PM

Hi,
In M/06 you select the group condition indicator for your condition type.
Cheers,
Satish Purandare

PO Price update at Header Level

Hi Friends,
Our PO Price "Update" button at header was grayed out and only able to do at item level??
Actually we have a "Post dated" PO and the tax rate was changed now. So, we need to update the tax rate. To update at item level for each and every item is cumbusome.
Is there any way to update at header level. Or is there any way to update in MASS??
Or is there any program available to carry out pricing for a bunch of PO's??
Any valuable reply will be appreciated.
Regards,
Dev

Hi,
Since the condition type which you are using for taxes are configured to be entered at item level and changes can be made only at item level.
If you want to update it at header level and the condition type is applicable for all the line item in PO, please change in configuartion so that u can make changes at header level.
Path SPRO-> MM->Purchasing-> Conditions-> Define price determination process->Define conditon types . For particular condition type which u want to make changes at header level. Thr is a option changes which can be made. Click on check box for header condition.
Please see that it is config changes and it will get updated wherever this condition type is used.
Reply if u have any issues still.
Thanks,
Ravi

Deactivation of Pricing Conditions at header level of Sales Order

Hello there,
We have used a routine in pricing procedure (BaseType Routine) to deactivate condition MWST in the MWST condition line in pricing procedure, transaction V/08.
In the routine, We played with the KINAK (set to K )and KOBLI (set to space) flags of structure KOMT1 and XKOMV and delete the MWST entry in the TOBLI table and succeeded to deactivate the MWST at item level of the sales order. (MWST condition appear in the conditions tab at item level as inactive)
We have created a sales order with only one item that has the MWST condition deactivated at item level.
But in the conditions at header level the MWST condition does not appear. Shouldn't the MWST condition appear at header level but deactivated (with a yellow triangle next to MWST)?
If yes is there a flag that we forgot to set?

Hi,
what is the table name you had mentioned
TOBLI is it correct?
Thanks
mano

Pricing Conditions deactivation at header level of Sales Order

Hello there,
We have used a routine in pricing procedure (BaseType Routine) to deactivate condition MWST in the MWST condition line in pricing procedure, transaction V/08.
In the routine, We played with the KINAK (set to K )and KOBLI (set to space) flags of structure KOMT1 and XKOMV and delete the MWST entry in the TOBLI table and succeeded to deactivate the MWST at item level of the sales order. (MWST condition appear in the conditions tab at item level as inactive)
We have created a sales order with only one item that has the MWST condition deactivated at item level.
But in the conditions at header level the MWST condition does not appear. Shouldn't the MWST condition appear at header level but deactivated (with a yellow triangle next to MWST)?
If yes is there a flag that we forgot to set?

Hi experts,
Has anyone done the above mentioned before, please reply...

Creating a Count at Header level..

Hi Experts,
What do you mean by creating a "count" at Header Level & Item Level?I have a Key Figure called PO Count(which counts the total number of Purchase orders),but my client says that this KF just counts the PO's at Item level and that they need a count at Header level.
Any help on this would be appreciated.
Thanks
Aravind Pattabiraman

Hi,
if ur still not able to do that
goto EEWB
Enter the Project Name
Right click on the Enhancement---->Select back to previous version.
Please Reward Points & Mark Helpful Answers
To mark Helpful Answers ;click radio Button next to the post.
RadioButtons
o Helpful Answer
o Very helpful Answer
o Problem Solved.
Click any of the above button next to the post; as per the anwers
To close the thread; Click Probelm solved Radio Button next to the post , which u feel is best possible answers

Expense Report not routed to Prepay Auditor when PrePay Auditor is setup at header level

Expense Report not routed to Prepay Auditor when PrePay Auditor is setup at header level, I have attached screenshots of my setup.
ER is routed correctly if PrePay Auditor is setup at line level.
Why am I not able to route to header level approval stage?
I am on Peoplesoft 9.2 Image 10.
Thanks,
Jyothsna

Well, I found something that worked for me.
I found a blog post by Ryan Nielsen and it included these instructions:
Original Post
Article Text:
Reporting Services - Unable to Connect to Remote Server Error After a restart reporting services, you may come up with Unable to Connect to Remote Server Error when navigating to the web access. Typically an issue like this occurs in the RSWebApplication.config. This file is located in the ReportManager Folder (Example: C:\Program Files\Microsoft SQL Server\MSSQL.3\Reporting Services\ReportManager) I checked the <reportserverurl> and <reportservervirtualdirectory> tags were the same as before.
<ReportServerUrl></ReportServerUrl>
<ReportServerVirtualDirectory>ReportServer</ReportServerVirtualDirectory>
<ReportBuilderTrustLevel>FullTrust</ReportBuilderTrustLevel>
After changing the ReportServerUrl tag to contain both the server URL and the virtual directory, it could then connect to the remote server.
<ReportServerUrl>http://Server/ReportServer/</ReportServerUrl>
<ReportServerVirtualDirectory></ReportServerVirtualDirectory>
<ReportBuilderTrustLevel>FullTrust</ReportBuilderTrustLevel>
No IP addresses were added or was any IIS settings that I could tell. Leaving the ReportServerUrl tag blank should allow for it to find the server locally.
End Article Text
I did this and restarted the Reporting Services service and it now works without a problem.
I hope this helps someone.
JB

Inactive component cost not rolled up to top level item

Hi
Our scenario is as follows: we have a top level item with a BOM. And some components of the BOM are having material status u2018inactiveu2019. Inactive means materials will not procured and sold, however we could have inventory which can be consumed in production of other materials. In other words inactive items are like old items. These inactive items already have costing value. And we donu2019t want to recost inactive items.
Having described above scenario, the requirement here is when we run costing for top level item, system should take costing value of inactive items and roll up into top level item costing which is NOT happening now. Client donu2019t want to recost inactive items. The reason for not recosting inactive items is the recosting could change cost of inactive items significantly. We are using 4.7 version and standard costing.
Would appreciate any ideas or suggestions in this regard.
thanx
Sunil

Thanks Young for the reply.
We already set 'do not cost' indicator for inactive components. And these inactive components do have standard costs valid up 10 12/31/2999. It seems bom explosion is excluding these materials. it is ok to exclude. However the existing standard cost of these inactive components did not roll up in to top level. when I checked the costing status log, it says material ABCDF123 in plant 3344 has material status 40: Inactive.
I checked BOM as well and inactive component is flagged as 'relevant for costing'.
We are using following valuation varaiant
Strategy Sequence -> 1. Planned Price 1 2.Standard Cost
Transfer Control - Complete Transfer
thnx

How to check plan line items for plan cost at network activity level?

Dear all,
How to check plan line items for plan cost at network activity level? The plan cost is done in network activity in CJ20N.
I am not able to check using CJI4 or CJI9 report.
Kindly advise.
Thanks and regards,
Jessie

Hi Jess,
Have you checked the navigation part which is being displayed on left hand side of report S_ALR_87013565 and S_ALR_87013533.? There you have option to check transaction currency and object currency when you double click on it.
In case if it is not being displayed under navigation. Then you can bring them on from transaction code CJE2. For eg: Report group for S_ALR_87013533 is 12KST1C. Double click on it and it will open up to do changes in report layout and many more. There you also have options to bring on transaction currency too. Similarly, you can check for other report groups as well just by checking the report description.
But I am not sure if suits your requirements. Wait for other experts to comment on this.
Regards,
Amit

Cost Assignment Change on Header Level

This User changed the cost assignment at the top level to an internal order;
however, it did not apply to one of the hotel charges.
The other charge on the same date for the same vendor did change.
What caused the one transaction to remain with a cost center instead of internal order?
It was our understanding if the User changed the cost assignment at the top level it would be applied to all transactions in the report. Is this not correct?

Got the Solution from Development Colleagues:
If a traveler change the cost assignment from cost object A to cost object B at the top level of an expense report, then all expenses which are assigned to the cost object A at change moment(!) should get the new cost assignment to cost object B.
All expenses which are assigned to a different cost objects as A will be not changed!
Example 1:
Step 1. Traveler created an expense report with the cost assignment to cost center A
Step 2. Traveler added 3 expenses
=> Expected result: all 3 expenses should get the assignment to the cost center A
Step 3. Now traveler changed the cost assignment on top level of the meeting request to the project B
=> Expected result: all 3 expenses should get the assignment to the project B
Example 2:
Step 1. Traveler created an expense report with the cost assignment to cost center A
Step 2. Traveler added 3 expenses
=> Expected result: all 3 expenses should get the assignment to the cost center A
Step 3. Traveler changed manually the cost assignment of one expense to internal
order D
=> Expected result: 2 expenses are assigned to the cost center A and one expense is assigned to the internal order D (because of manually change!)
Step 4. Now the traveler changed the cost assignment on top level of meeting request from the cost center A to project B
=> Expected result: only 2 expenses which were assigned to the project A are now assigned to the project B, the one expense which was assigned to the internal order D should be still assigned to the internal order D (it is not assigned to the cost center A and therefore not affected by the change from cost center A to project B).

Transportation costing : costing on header level, item/stage conditions

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for