Trouble getting internet route table distributet in a VRF

Hi every one ..
I'm have some trouble getting distributed the internet routing table between PE routers ...
CE1 og PE1 works fine, BGP routes all internet routes are shown i en route table, but distributing between PE1 and PE2 is now working .. any one having a clue !!.
My gold is to move internet access into it's oven VRF, and away from the global routing table
In the MPLS core aim running the same AS number as our official AS, that we use for peering to the internet..
snap of configurations
***CE1***
router bgp 65534
neighbor 172.31.61.55 remote-as 65534
neighbor 172.31.61.55 description PE-1
neighbor 172.31.61.55 shutdown
neighbor 172.31.61.55 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 172.31.61.55 next-hop-self
***MPLS PE1***
ip vrf NET-INTERNET
rd 65534:10051
route-target export 65534:10051
route-target import 65534:10051
interface Port-channel1.35
encapsulation dot1Q 35
ip vrf forwarding NET-INTERNET
ip address 172.31.61.55 255.255.255.224
mpls label protocol ldp
tag-switching mtu 1546
tag-switching ip
router bgp 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.146 remote-as 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.146 description PE2
neighbor 192.168.0.146 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 192.168.0.146 version 4
neighbor 192.168.0.146 next-hop-self
address-family vpnv4
neighbor 192.168.0.146 activate
neighbor 192.168.0.146 send-community both
exit-address-family
address-family ipv4 vrf NET-INTERNET
neighbor 172.31.1.2 remote-as 65534
neighbor 172.31.1.2 activate
neighbor 172.31.1.2 description CE1
no auto-summary
no synchronization
exit-address-family
***MPLS PE2***
ip vrf NET-INTERNET
rd 65534:10051
route-target export 65534:10051
route-target import 65534:10051
interface Port-channel1.67
encapsulation dot1Q 67
ip vrf forwarding NET-INTERNET
ip address 172.31.254.1 255.255.255.252
mpls label protocol ldp
tag-switching mtu 1546
tag-switching ip
router bgp 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.132 remote-as 65534
neighbor 192.168.0.132 description PE1
neighbor 192.168.0.132 update-source Loopback0
neighbor 192.168.0.132 version 4
address-family ipv4 vrf NET-INTERNET
neighbor 172.31.254.2 remote-as 65534
neighbor 172.31.254.2 activate
Best regards
/Peter

For VPN routes to be exchanged between the two PEs, you first need to configure VPNv4 address family on each one of the PEs.
Carrying the full Internet routing table over VPNv4 will work but it is not very scalable since all PE routers have to hold the full Internet routing table in the VRF context in addition to potentially full Internet routing table in the global routing table. If you want to exchange full Internet routing table between the two CEs, it would be preferable to use something Carrier Supporting Carrier (CSC).
Please refer to the following URL for additional information on CSC:
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/120newft/120limit/120s/120s23/fscscl23.htm
Hope this helps,

Similar Messages

The growth of the internet routing table + LISP

I have been challenged with the task of putting together a 15-20 minute presentation of how I might go about solving the problem of the growth of the internet routing table.
If I am understanding the question correctly - as the internet grows so will the number of IPv4 and (moreso) IPv6 prefixes that appear in the global internet routing table. This will mean that the PE and P routers in a Service Provider network will find themselves having to deal with more prefixes that will in turn increase the possibility of bogons interferring with proper routing and increase the load on the routers themselves.
Besides being a very open ended question, I am trying to look at it from the perspective of a Service Provider (whom I work for) and have come up with the following options (admittedly this is only after a quick google on the topic):
> Improvise in the short term by adjusting CAM table allocation
> Use selective hearing by filtering prefixes that are not important
> Use external assistance like LISP and DNS
> Spend Money and upgrading existing routers to handle the load
Obviously with only a 20 minute window I cannot talk about much and I would like the options to be innnovative and interesting. LISP seems like an interesting option and I would like to learn about it - however I am having trouble tracking down resources that give a basic introduction to exactly what and how LISP works (every time I try and search for it a get pushed to sites talking about the programming language ).
So this leads me to two questions:
1. Is there anything important, vital or interesting that I have not included in my quickly put together list above.
2. Is anyone aware for a good site/resource that explains LISP from a beginners/tutorial-type perspective.

I have been challenged with the task of putting together a 15-20 minute presentation of how I might go about solving the problem of the growth of the internet routing table.
If I am understanding the question correctly - as the internet grows so will the number of IPv4 and (moreso) IPv6 prefixes that appear in the global internet routing table. This will mean that the PE and P routers in a Service Provider network will find themselves having to deal with more prefixes that will in turn increase the possibility of bogons interferring with proper routing and increase the load on the routers themselves.
Besides being a very open ended question, I am trying to look at it from the perspective of a Service Provider (whom I work for) and have come up with the following options (admittedly this is only after a quick google on the topic):
> Improvise in the short term by adjusting CAM table allocation
> Use selective hearing by filtering prefixes that are not important
> Use external assistance like LISP and DNS
> Spend Money and upgrading existing routers to handle the load
Obviously with only a 20 minute window I cannot talk about much and I would like the options to be innnovative and interesting. LISP seems like an interesting option and I would like to learn about it - however I am having trouble tracking down resources that give a basic introduction to exactly what and how LISP works (every time I try and search for it a get pushed to sites talking about the programming language ).
So this leads me to two questions:
1. Is there anything important, vital or interesting that I have not included in my quickly put together list above.
2. Is anyone aware for a good site/resource that explains LISP from a beginners/tutorial-type perspective.

Trouble getting internet access

I'm having trouble getting the internet to open up using SAFARI when my MAC wakes up.
When I try to bring it up I get the following message "Redirect Server: Rapid Logic/1.1 MIME-version: 1.0 Connection: close Content-Type: text/html Location:http://launchmodem/redirectBS.htm"
The only way I get it to work is to type in "http://launchmodem/redirectBS.htm"
and I get this message "WARNING!
Unable to resolve your redirection DNS entry
Please clear browser cache close and then reopen it to try again"
Then I hit ok and it works.
Any ideas on why this happens and how to fix it?

Forgot to mention that I am I am using a wireless router to connect if that is important.

Phone unable to get Host Routing Tables

Hey,
I've been on with Rogers tech support for sometime today.
My originating issue was wireless wouldn't work and everytime i tried to scan for networks the bb would freeze and auto restart. I did a backup and wiped the device and wireless was working yet again.
But now i'm unable to get data services at all, apparently with rogers you're supposed to get EDGE and not edge. You're also supposed to have 8 entries in the Host Routing Table and i have none.
Rogers has wiped the handheld, reloaded all applications to barebones and still the issue persists.
Whenever i try to do a full restore it errors out at reloading WLAN Profiles and options.
Before all this started and it was wiped trying to view WIFI Options an error popped up "Uncaught Exception: padded byte out of range" now i remembered that from memory so the Uncaught part maybe wrong.
Really don't want to drop another $500 on a phone literally 2 years after i spent $400 for this thing.
Thanks
Ian

I should also add that i tried my dads sim card in my phone and same issue.
Radio Data Activation: Yes
Signal Level: -86dBm
Radio Access: EDGE
Network: Rogers Wireless
IP Address: 10.172.171.13
ICMP Ping Echo: Yes
BlackBerry Registration: No
Connected to BlackBerry: No
BlackBerry PIN-PIN: No
Server Name: GBISXNAC01S08
Email Address: <email address #1>
Connected to <email address #1>: No
Server Name: GBISXNAC01S08
Email address: <email address #2>
Connected to <email address #2>: No
PIN: 24a5d7dd
MSISDN: <my phone number>
Device Type: BlackBerry 8900
Application Version: v4.6.1.94
Platform Version: 4.2.0.69
Thanks
Ian

Having trouble getting ethernet router off computer to use local wifi

My daughters touchscreen laptop was used on an ethernet router at college. She is now home and we use an AT&T elevate hot spot. The laptop will not let her online due to looking for router. How can we get the router off and get our internet in?

Chery,
Welcome to the HP Community Forum.
The following is a Guess:
This is answer may seem counter-intuitive to your question:
How to Assign a Static IP Address in Windows 7, 8, XP, or Vista
The computer may be set up to use a Static IP address and / or it is set up to look for a particular Internet Service Provider -- (DNS Server), that is, the provider at the school.
You might go in and check the Network setup.
You may need to do this in the WiFi and Lan Network Adapter settings if such are available.
If your computer is set up as shown in the directions in the Link -- then you want to make the following changes to remove that static IP setup and allow your computer to be "free" to select your home Wifi network.
Local Area Connection Properties window:
Where it suggests in the directions that you Select
"Use the following IP address"
and
"Use the folling DNS Server Address"
on your computer:
You confirm / Select "Obtain a IP Address automatically"
and
You confirm / Select "Obtain DNS Server address automatically"
===========================================================================
I hope this makes sense.
Click the Kudos Thumbs-Up to show you appreciate the help.
Click Accept as Solution when the Answer provides a Fix or Workaround!
I am pleased to provide assistance on behalf of HP. I do not work for HP.
Kind Regards,
Dragon-Fur

Trouble getting BGP route to be primary

We have an MPLS network between locations using BGP. Several locations have a VPN connection as a backup and use OSPF for those routes.
When an MPLS link goes down, the traffic switches over to the VPN connection just fine. But when the MPLS link comes back up, the OSPF route is still overriding the BGP route. I've changed the weights for both BGP & OSPF but still can't get the BGP route to override the OSPF route.
Any ideas as to what I'm missing?
Main router, MPLS link active at remote site:
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 6837, local router ID is 216.149.85.242
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 172.16.104.0/24 216.149.85.241 300 2828 3549 2828 i
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp 172.16.104.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.16.104.0/24, version 6839
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag: 0x820
Not advertised to any peer
2828 3549 2828
216.149.85.241 from 216.149.85.241 (216.149.85.241)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, weight 300, valid, external, best
After shutting down the remote interface, traffic switches to the VPN link.
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 6842, local router ID is 216.149.85.242
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 172.16.104.0/24 172.16.196.4 123 100 ?
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp 172.16.104.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.16.104.0/24, version 6842
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag: 0x820
Advertised to update-groups:
1
Local
172.16.196.4 from 0.0.0.0 (216.149.85.242)
Origin incomplete, metric 123, localpref 100, weight 100, valid, sourced,
best
Bringing up the remote interface, the traffic stays on the VPN.
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 6843, local router ID is 216.149.85.242
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 172.16.104.0/24 172.16.196.4 123 100 ?
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp 172.16.104.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.16.104.0/24, version 6842
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Advertised to update-groups:
1
Local
172.16.196.4 from 0.0.0.0 (216.149.85.242)
Origin incomplete, metric 123, localpref 100, weight 100, valid, sourced,
best
Finally, terminating the site-site VPN tunnel restores the MPLS route:
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp
BGP table version is 6845, local router ID is 216.149.85.242
Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal,
r RIB-failure, S Stale
Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete
Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 172.16.104.0/24 216.149.85.241 300 2828 3549 2828 i
nbrtr2#sh ip bgp 172.16.104.0
BGP routing table entry for 172.16.104.0/24, version 6845
Paths: (1 available, best #1, table Default-IP-Routing-Table)
Flag: 0x820
Not advertised to any peer
2828 3549 2828
216.149.85.241 from 216.149.85.241 (216.149.85.241)
Origin IGP, localpref 100, weight 300, valid, external, best
Config details:
router ospf 100
log-adjacency-changes
redistribute static subnets
redistribute bgp 36166 metric 20 subnets
network 172.16.196.0 0.0.0.255 area 0
network 172.16.224.0 0.0.3.255 area 0
router bgp 36166
network 172.16.210.0 mask 255.255.255.0
network 172.16.211.0 mask 255.255.255.0
redistribute ospf 100 route-map Redist-OSPF
neighbor 216.149.85.241 remote-as 2828
neighbor 216.149.85.241 weight 300
default-information originate
access-list 11 remark Define OSPF routes for redistribution
access-list 11 permit 172.16.11.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 11 permit 172.16.16.0 0.0.1.255
access-list 11 permit 172.16.196.0 0.0.1.255
access-list 11 permit 172.16.198.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 12 remark Define VPN routes for redistribution
access-list 12 permit 172.16.104.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 12 permit 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 12 permit 192.168.3.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 12 permit 192.168.4.0 0.0.0.255
access-list 12 permit 192.168.8.0 0.0.0.255
route-map Redist-OSPF permit 10
match ip address 11
set weight 500
route-map Redist-OSPF permit 20
match ip address 12
set weight 100
route-map Redist-OSPF permit 30

Hi,
IMHO, you should use the same Weight for both the BGP prefix redistributed from OSPF and received from the BGP neighbor.
And set other attribute (Local Preference, e.g.) to make the prefix received from the BGP neighbor to win when the MPLS interface goes Up again.
Another issue might be though:
When the MPLS interface is Down, you get the OSPF prefix redistributed to your BGP table, And when the MPLS interface goes Up again, you might be advertising this prefix to the backbone. And it can beat the prefix advertised from the remote site. If it's your case, I'd also try to prepend your AS number several times to the prefix advertised from your router to make it less preferred within the backbone comparing to the original BGP prefix.
Best regards,
Milan.

Trouble getting internet connection

Hi, lately, I've been having trouble connecting to the internet. What will happen is, it will only read the network on and off (sometimes it reads it, sometimes it doesn't), and when I do get a signal, it's pretty weak. Even if I click linksys from the top bar, it will try to connect for a few seconds, then just stop trying and now connect. However, when I'm closer to the router, it works fine.
It's almost as if the signal is just barely reaching my computer, but I know that isn't the case because my PS3 gets perfect internet connection at both of my houses in the same location as my computer, so it must be the computer.
Any ideas on how to fix it?

I haven't tried anything really, except for powering everything down and back up.
But like I said, I've had the exact same problems at different locations with different routers. It's not the router(s), it's my computer, it's the exact same problem no matter where I try it, I'm also not getting a signal from next door (which I always get) unless I go outside near the next door neighbor's house. Unless I'm extremely close to a base, I usually won't pick up a signal, although sometimes I randomly will for a few minutes.

Trouble getting internet through Airport Express

I am trying to set up the most basic wireless network with a cable modem, Airport Express and G4 Powerbook running 10.4.6. I have went through all the steps of setting up the modem then the Airport Express and configuring it with Airport Admin. and all that. I get perfect signal from the express but when I open Safari it doesn't do anything. It doesn't come up with the network diagnostic "Not Connected to the Internet" screen or anything. When I plug my modem directly into the Powerbook through ethernet it works fine.
It seems as though I am just missing a step or an option or something like that.
I have also tried to use my roomates old Motorola WA480G wireless router with similar results. I can get Wi-Fi signal through the Airport card but Safari brings up the network diagnostic screen.
G4 Powerbook Mac OS X (10.4.6)
G4 Powerbook

I am having this exact same problem, only using a Dell laptop with Windows XP instead of a Mac. I had my Airport Express set up on a LAN at work a couple of months ago and it worked perfectly. It's been in storage for a couple of months, and now that I am trying to set it up at home with my cable modem, I can't get it to connect to the internet.
When I plug the modem in with an ethernet cable everything works perfectly. But when I plug it into the airport (after doing the power down/power up process) the LED goes solid green, but nothing will load in my browser. I can use other wireless networks without problem.
I also can't get it to print anymore. When I plug the printer directly into my computer it prints just fine. But when I plug it into the airport, it won't print. I've set the printer up using Bonjour, and the Airport Admin utility detects the printer. But when I print I get an error message saying that the printer failed to print the document.
Any ideas?

Trouble getting internet radio to play

I have Win 7 and IE 10 with all updates current. Yet I am still unable to get any internet radio statoins to play on my laptop

This is the forum for Adobe Reader.
You'll need to find a forum for whatever it is you are using to play the radio stations.
Good luck.

Trouble getting Internet Snow Dual Ethernet

I'm connected to my Snow base station--when I go into diagnostics, I have GREEN lights for:
Airport
Airport Settings
Network Settings
ISP
But RED lights for:
Internet
Server
I've tried restarting everything to no avail. The modem is working and the lights are flashing on the base station indicating a connection, but it's not reaching my computer.
I have a feeling it's the internet settings (address/DHCP and all that other stuff I don't understand).
Thoughts?
Thanks!

michaelbenji wrote:
I'm connected to my Snow base station--when I go into diagnostics, I have GREEN lights for:
Airport
Airport Settings
Network Settings
ISP
But RED lights for:
Internet
Server
I have a feeling it's the internet settings (address/DHCP and all that other stuff I don't understand).
Launch Network Utility, select the "Ping" tab, enter "discussions.apple.com" (without the quotes) and click the "Ping" button. If the result is 100% packet loss, change the address to "207.246.192.8" (also without the quotes). If the result is "0% packet loss", then there's something wrong with your DSN settings. In AirPort Utility check those settings in the Internet/Internet Connection panel. In System Preferences select the "Network" panel, then the AirPort connection item, click on the "Advanced" button and select the "DNS" tab.

3845 router failing to look up routes from routing table correctly!

Hi all,
Got a really strange issue which I am wondering if someone can point me in the right direction for. Facts of the issue:
- Some customers, all with a specific ISP, cannot access a hosted service we host internally
- External user can reach service but never gets a response - hence focussing on reachability of their public IP
- Cisco 3845 router used, peers with service provider over BGP - receives full internet routing tables
- All affected customers receive dynamic IP addresses within the same /10 public IP range
I received an example IP address and when doing "show ip route x.x.x.x" for this IP, the router responds "Subnet not in table". When trying to traceroute to the IP, the router doesnt even go to the next hop. However, the subnet is definitely in the routing table with the correct next hop (and, for complete information, is also within the BGP updates). Before anyone asks the question :) - yes I have definitely verified that the hosts are within this subnet.
If I put a static /32 route in for this specific IP address, everything works fine - then fails again once its taken out.
I literally cannot understand why the router is not correctly performing the lookup for the hosts within this subnet. I can understand a lot of potential reasons why the BGP received route wouldnt be placed in the routing table, but that is not the case here.
Some other factors (if applicable):
- Nothing showing in the logs
- Plenty memory available (despite the high number of routes)
- Plenty CPU resource available
- No default route is ran
I am going to restart the router and really expect this to resolve the issue (would log a TAC but this one is a bit time precious) - but it is frankly doing my head in and I assume I am missing something!
Any help or guidance would be appreciated!

Hi all,
Got a really strange issue which I am wondering if someone can point me in the right direction for. Facts of the issue:
- Some customers, all with a specific ISP, cannot access a hosted service we host internally
- External user can reach service but never gets a response - hence focussing on reachability of their public IP
- Cisco 3845 router used, peers with service provider over BGP - receives full internet routing tables
- All affected customers receive dynamic IP addresses within the same /10 public IP range
I received an example IP address and when doing "show ip route x.x.x.x" for this IP, the router responds "Subnet not in table". When trying to traceroute to the IP, the router doesnt even go to the next hop. However, the subnet is definitely in the routing table with the correct next hop (and, for complete information, is also within the BGP updates). Before anyone asks the question :) - yes I have definitely verified that the hosts are within this subnet.
If I put a static /32 route in for this specific IP address, everything works fine - then fails again once its taken out.
I literally cannot understand why the router is not correctly performing the lookup for the hosts within this subnet. I can understand a lot of potential reasons why the BGP received route wouldnt be placed in the routing table, but that is not the case here.
Some other factors (if applicable):
- Nothing showing in the logs
- Plenty memory available (despite the high number of routes)
- Plenty CPU resource available
- No default route is ran
I am going to restart the router and really expect this to resolve the issue (would log a TAC but this one is a bit time precious) - but it is frankly doing my head in and I assume I am missing something!
Any help or guidance would be appreciated!

VRF Best Practice: LAN only VRF, Mgmt VRF, Global Routing table or VRF?

I am setting up a routed LAN (not a WAN) environment on two 6500 switches (sup-720). My goal is to create 32 routed environments separated by logical firewalls (multi-context ASA's). So I want a âcoreâ router in each environment, and don't want to buy 32 pairs of 6500's-sorry Cisco.
Each of these environments are tied together by a core routing environment, running on the same pair of 6500's. No WAN MPLS is going on and I am trying to use VRF for each of the routed environments core router. The management functions of the 6500 shall run off the VRF Core router and ip range (the one that ties all the other VRF's together. Here is a simple diagram:
VRF1
||
FW1
||
VRFCOR
||
FW2
||
VRF2
So to go from VRF1 to VRF2, you traverse two firewalls and VRFCOR.
Several questions related to this design:
1) Am I nuts to use VRF's in this application?
2) Is there a better choice than VRF's to do what I want?
3) Should VRFCOR be the global routing table (IOW, not a VRF)? Or should be its own VRF? Another way to ask this is: Shall a router ever run entirely in VRF tables, or should there be at least one global table in use?
4) Are there problems with any management protocols on a VRF, such as NTP, AAA, SNMP, LOGGING, TELNET? Or have all those been worked out?
5) Any other suggestions?
TIA, Will

VRF is suited for such kind of an application. Refer to URL http://cisco.com/application/pdf/en/us/guest/netsol/ns171/c649/ccmigration_09186a0080851cc6.pdf to get an idea about the

ISCSI boot with Intel NICs added to windows 2008 r2 routing table causes non iscsi traffic to attempt default routes on iscsi networks

I have a server with Intel 82576 Gigabit Dual Port Nics. I have configured them to use iSCSI boot the primary looks to 10.0.0.1/24 and the secondary looks to 10.0.1.1/24. The target is configured correctly. Everything boots as expected.
I have added the MPIO feature and configured MPIO for the iscsi initiator as per: http://blogs.technet.com/b/migreene/archive/2009/08/29/3277914.aspx.
My issue is that the iSCSI networks show up in the routing table like so:
I did not configure a default route in the Intel setup utility:
I tried to explicitly remove the 0.0.0.0 entry and leave blank, with no change. As you can see with the above routing table traffic attempts to travel over these routes:
C:\Users\Administrator>ping google.com
Pinging google.com [209.85.145.99] with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from 10.0.0.201: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 10.0.1.201: Destination host unreachable.
Reply from 209.85.145.99: bytes=32 time=23ms TTL=51
Reply from 209.85.145.99: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=51
Ping statistics for 209.85.145.99:
Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
A ping to the outside world first attempts on 10.0.0.x/24 network, then on 10.0.1.x/24 network and then finally on the network the traffic should go over. I don't want my iSCSI traffic to ever show up with a default route. How do I get rid of it?
route delete 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 "on-link" results in: The route deletion failed: The parameter is incorrect.
route delete 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 on-link results in: The route deletion failed: The parameter is incorrect.
route delete 0.0.0.0 deletes all default routes, then I have to add back in the "valid default route" of 192.168.100.6.
I would like to not have to do a route delete though.

So I've sort of given up on fixing the gateway assignment in the route for iSCSI boot. I configured a DHCP server to give out the information required by iSCSI boot and configured the network cards to use DHCP for their configuration. I insured
that my DHCP server gave out no default gateway entry. However, I still got the undesired routes in the routing table. This makes me assume that there isn't a "fix" for it, only the workaround.
Here is the script I run on each iSCSI Boot initiator (you would obviously change the ip number to suit your environment):
@Echo off
Rem fixes iscsi route problem as shown below:
Rem IPv4 Route Table
REM ===========================================================================
REM Active Routes:
REM Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
REM 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
REM 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 On-link 10.0.1.200 266
REM 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.6 192.168.100.98 266
REM The top 2 lines are on the iscsi interface and traffic tries to go out it
REM We need to delete the routes, so we'll just delete all gateway routes and
REM add back in the one we care about.
route delete 0.0.0.0 >c:\iscsibootroutefix.log
route -p add 0.0.0.0 mask 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.6 >>c:\iscsibootroutefix.log
After running it I get:
IPv4 Route Table
===========================================================================
Active Routes:
Network Destination Netmask Gateway Interface Metric
0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.100.6 192.168.100.98 11
10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
10.0.0.1 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
10.0.0.200 255.255.255.255 On-link 10.0.0.200 10255
Then I added a task in “task scheduler” of "administrative tools" that ran as the user “system” “when the computer starts” that runs this script.

Full internet routing in an internet MPLS VPN

Is it possible and advisable to run the full internet routing table in a seperate MPLS VRF. A default route is not an option
With kind regards,
Mike

Hi,
It is not advisable to have full Internet Routing table in a vrf.It is possible that you may run out of memory since different routers have different vrf routes holding capacity.e.g if you are using 12000 series and you have only one vrf configured then you can hold the entire Internet routing table in one vrf.
Which router you have ? Is it 12000 ?How many vrfs you have ? How many routes have you per vrf ?
You need to consider the above questions before making the decision.
-Waris

Im having trouble getting my wifi, it connects to the router but isnt getting internet. My room mates and I can connect our iphones and other devices just fine, help would be appriciated

First time on here and my knowledge with networking and such is very limited, my Mac Pro can connect to the router but when I try to open my browser it wont bring up any webpage. The only way I can get internet is through an ethernet port, Im basically at a loss for what to do.

You will find the AirPort icon (looks like this ) on the OS X menu bar. Option (or right) click the icon, and you should be greeted with a drop-down menu. All of the parameters I mentioned should now appear after the name of your Wi-Fi network.
The meaning of each of the values are as follows:
PHY Mode = The radio mode that your Mac Pro is connecting with.
Channel = The radio channel the Mac Pro is connected to.
RSSI = Received Signal Strength Indication. It's an indication of the power level of the signal as preceived by the Mac Pro's internal Wi-Fi antenna. Typically the higher the RSSI number the stronger the signal. RSSI is measured in arbitrary units. Some manufacterers use a positive scale, others like Apple, use a negative (0 to -100) instead. For the AirPorts, the less negative the better.
Transmit Rate = Instantaneous maximum date transfer rate of the connection in Mbps (Megabits per second)
MCX Index = Modulation and Coding Scheme. The MCS value identifies a number of things, including the number of spatial streams used in the Wi-Fi connection between the Mac Pro and the AirPort router. A larger or smaller MCS value is meaningless. Instead, it defines the actual connection type. In turn, the type can play a significantly on the potential bandwidth performance.

Trouble getting internet route table distributet in a VRF

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for