UDP ERROR 113

DEAR READERS
                                   I AM A BEGINNER LEVEL LABVIEW APPLICATION ENGINEER. I AM TRYING TO COMMUNICATE TWO SYSTEMS(MY LAPTOP AND COMPUTER) USING UDP PROTOCOL IN LABVIEW. I HAVE CODED THE REQUIRED IN BOTH THE SYSTEM. I AM FACING ERROR WHEN I RUN BOTH THE SYSTEM SIMULTANEOUSLY.
                                    THE ERROR NUMBER IS 113 AND 56 SOMETIMES.
ERROR 113 SAYS THAT THE MESSAGE SENT ON A DATAGRAM SOCKET WAS LARGER THAN THE INTERNAL MESSAGE BUFFER OR SOME OTHER NETWORK LIMIT OR THE BUFFER USED TO RECEIVE A DATAGRAM WAS SMALLER THAN THE DATAGRAM ITSELF.
         WHAT SHOULD I DO TO REMOVE THESE ERROR 56 AND ERROR 113???

Dear Reader,
I regret for the caps letter. I am sending you my code UDP try and udp try receive. I am facing 113 error.You can run it simultaneously in two system and see to yourself. I am a beginner in LabVIEW. I am happy to get your help.
Attachments:
udp receive try.vi ‏13 KB
udp try.vi ‏54 KB

Similar Messages

Increase UDP sending size over 64k bytes and get error -113,sending buffer not enough

Dear all,
I have a case that I must send a data over 64k bytes in a socket with UDP . I got a error-113 shows "A message sent on a datagram socket was larger than the internal message buffer or some other network limit, or the buffer used to receive a datagram was smaller than the datagram itself.".I searched for this issue and got the closest answer as below:
http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/D5AC7E8AE545322D8625730100604F2D?OpenDocument
It said I have to change buffer size with Wsock.dll. I used the same mathod to increaes the send buffer to 131072 bytes by choice optionname to so_sndbuf (x1001) and give it value with 131072 and it worked fine without error. However I still got an error 113 while sending data with " UDP Write.vi ". It seems UDP write.vi reset the buffer size? Are there any other things cause the error?
I attached example code. In UDP Sender.vi you can see I change send buffer size to 131072 and send date included a 65536 bytes data.There is also a UDP receiver.vi and there is some missing VI which you can get from the LINK. But it's not necessary.
Attachments:
UDP Sender.vi ‏14 KB
UDP Receiver.vi ‏16 KB
UDP_set_send_buffer.vi ‏16 KB

The header for a UDP packet includes a 16 bit field that defines the size of the UDP message (HEADER AND DATA)
16 bits limits you to a total size of 65635 bytes, minus the header sizes; a minimum of 20 bytes are required to define an IP packet and 8 bytes for UDP leaving an effective data payload of 65507
bytes.
LabVIEW is not the issue...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Datagram_Protocol#Packet_structure
Now is the right time to use %^<%Y-%m-%dT%H:%M:%S%3uZ>T
If you don't hate time zones, you're not a real programmer.
"You are what you don't automate"
Inplaceness is synonymous with insidiousness

Error 113 - UDP

I am currently using Labview 8.20
I am reading a text file and sending the contents of that file using UDP. The file is big and I get the
Error 113. " A message sent on a datagram was larger than the internal buffer or some other network limit,
or the buffer used to receive a datagram was small that the datagram itself". If I use a small file, it works.
I am fairly new to Labview and I just modified the code in the Examples for the UDP Sender and
I am using the UDP Receiver example.
I am using the Read From Text File VI and connected it's output text to the UDP data in.
Any ideas?
Jaime

Hi Jaime,
First of all, are you positive this is LabVIEW 8.20? I have noticed a similar issue that was resolved in LabVIEW 8.0... Are these two PCs both on the same OS and both with LabVIEW 8.20?
Assuming so, how large of a file are you transmitting using UDP? Have you seen what the threshold might be for causing this error? Also, try increasing the max bytes/read and see if that helps.
Sam
-Sam F, DAQ Marketing Manager
Learn about measuring temperature
Learn how to take voltage measurements
Learn how to measure current

Udp 發送大於64K資料產生錯誤 113 ,buffer不足

大家好
我必須用UDP送出大於64k的封包而遇到緩衝區不足的錯誤 113。查過說明發現可藉由設定Wsock.dll method: setsockopt: optionnameo_sndbuf.的方式來增加windows UDP sending buffer，但是個錯誤還是未解。詳細內容我寫在英文的討論區中
http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW/Increase-UDP-sending-size-over-64k-bytes-and-get-error-113/td-p/3051...
還請各路高手解惑，謝謝

Dear Reader,
I regret for the caps letter. I am sending you my code UDP try and udp try receive. I am facing 113 error.You can run it simultaneously in two system and see to yourself. I am a beginner in LabVIEW. I am happy to get your help.
Attachments:
udp receive try.vi ‏13 KB
udp try.vi ‏54 KB

Failed to read the table scslmthresh: error = 113

I'm continously getting the above error (Failed to read the table scslmthresh: error = 113) on a new sun cluster 3.2 on two T5240s with a 2540 as their storage. I've searched for this error but I cannot find any information on it. Anyone know what this is??
java[1935]: [ID 513556 daemon.warning] Failed to read the table scslmthresh: error = 113
I do have the cluster telemetry services running and a few storage resources, but nothing big yet. This error happens about every 2 hours, but the timing is not exaclty consistent.
thanks for any insight.

I figured out that this error definitely has to do with reading/writing information to the telemetry resource/data service, so I removed mine completely and re-installed it using the clsetup (option 8, then option 2). That seems to have removed the error. I'm guessing a Java patch changed something that the telemetry service didn't like.

Explanation of udp error codes

I would like to know all the possible error codes returned by the UDP vi's.
I am also interested in the same information for tcp and Serial comunication vi's.
At the last i would like to retrive a way to resume this kind of information for every vi that return an error cluster.
tks

Are you Gandalf the white?
I just went into LV help and did a search for error.
The list should the threee subcatagories you listed. A cut-n-paste follows.
TCP and UDP Error Codes
The TCP and UDP functions can return the following error codes.
Code Name Description
53 Manager call not supported.
54 ncBadAddressErr The network address is ill-formed.
55 ncInProgressErr The network operation is in progress.
56 ncTimeOutErr The network operation exceeded the user-specified or system time limit.
57 ncBusyErr The network connection is busy.
58 ncNotSupportedErr The network function is not supported.
59 ncNetErr The network is down, unreachable, or has been reset.
60 ncAddrInUseErr The specified network address is currently in use.
61 ncSysO
utOfMem The system could not allocate the necessary memory.
62 ncSysConnAbortedErr The system caused the network connection to be aborted.
63 ncConnRefusedErr The network connection was refused by the server.
64 ncNotConnectedErr The network connection is not established.
65 ncAlreadyConnectedErr The network connection is already established.
66 ncConnClosedErr The network connection was closed by the peer.
Is this what you need?
You can also "right-click" on an error cluster indicator and do a "explain error".
I hope this helps,
Ben
Ben Rayner
I am currently active on.. MainStream Preppers
Rayner's Ridge is under construction

Linux Error: 113: No route to host

After completeing 3.1 in the installation guide I jump down to chapter 4, but I can't get the web interface to work.
It doesn't matter how I access the URL, I've tried both http://localhost:8080/htmldb and http://realhostname:8080/htmldb/ with same result, no data at all, the connection is closed directly.
I've checked listener.log and found this:
02-NOV-2005 01:01:02 * http * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=10.8.0.22)(PORT=2556)) * handoff * http * 12518
TNS-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
TNS-12571: TNS:packet writer failure
TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
TNS-00530: Protocol adapter error
Linux Error: 113: No route to host
02-NOV-2005 01:01:23 * http * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=127.0.0.1)(PORT=33183)) * handoff * http * 12518
TNS-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
TNS-12571: TNS:packet writer failure
TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
TNS-00530: Protocol adapter error
Linux Error: 113: No route to host
02-NOV-2005 01:02:54 * service_update * XE * 0
02-NOV-2005 01:03:01 * http * (ADDRESS=(PROTOCOL=tcp)(HOST=X.Y.Z.W)(PORT=33509)) * handoff * http * 12518
TNS-12518: TNS:listener could not hand off client connection
TNS-12571: TNS:packet writer failure
TNS-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
TNS-00530: Protocol adapter error
Linux Error: 113: No route to host

Problem located (as usual after the 3 hours it took me to find the forum and post about it).
Using netstat and lsof I found that XE not only binds to 1521 and 8080, but also to port 33172 and since iptables blocks everything it got "No route to host".
The question is if 33172 is static or just a randomly chosen port number.

GoldenGate extract issue - TCP/IP error 113 (No route to host)

Hi All,
I have created a new replicat process on a new server. The old server is to be de-commissioned. after I created the replicat process on the new server (I copied the replicat prm file from the existing server - which is to be de-commissioned to new server and changed old encrypted password with new one and DISCARDFILE location), I modified the extract parameter file on source server. I changed RMTHOST and RMTTRAIL from older server name to new server name and old location to new location. once done , I stopped the extract and ran below command:
ADD RMTTRAIL /u01/app/ggs/dirdat/db, EXTRACT Ext1
and then started the extract process after which I am getting this error:
*2012-03-16 02:24:39 GGS ERROR 150 TCP/IP error 113 (No route to host).*
*2012-03-16 02:24:39 GGS ERROR 190 PROCESS ABENDING.*
I can very well ping both servers from both source and target. Any thoughts?
-Onkar

got the answer. It was firewall issue. When i turned the firewall down "service iptables stop", everything was smooth. I have raised request with the proper team to add the source ip in the target system firewall.
-Onkar

Kiethly 2400 Error 113 "Undefined Header"

Hello,
   I am currently using a Keithley 2400 both as a current source and as a measuring device. The program I am running is based on the Keithly 24xx drivers (http://sine.ni.com/apps/utf8/niid_web_display.download_page?p_id_guid=25B255F3AA83660EE0440003BA7CCD71).
The program works perfectly for about 30 seconds of data collection, then shows Error 113 Undefined Header, then begins to work again after a brief interruption. The error will then appear randomly after that. Does anyone know what is causing this error and how to stop it? My code can be found attached to the message
I ran NI SPY and the following was highlighted red: >
697. viWaitOnEvent (GPIB0::16::INSTR (0x02D08828), IO_COMPLETION, 0, 0, 0x00000000)
> Process ID: 0x00000874         Thread ID: 0x00000D10
> Start Time: 15:31:10.343       Call Duration 00:00:00.000
> Status: 0xBFFF0015 (VI_ERROR_TMO)
from 697 to 708
The lines before it were:
695. VISA Write ("GPIB0::16::INSTR", ":ARM:COUN 1;:TRIG:COU...")
Process ID: 0x00000874         Thread ID: 0x00000FA4
Start Time: 15:31:10.328       Call Duration 00:00:00.000
Status: 0 (VI_SUCCESS)
696. VISA Write ("GPIB0::16::INSTR", "ARMOUR IMM;:ARM:TIM...")
Process ID: 0x00000874         Thread ID: 0x00000FA4
Start Time: 15:31:10.328       Call Duration 00:00:00.015
Status: 0 (VI_SUCCESS)
the lines after it were:
709. viWaitOnEvent (GPIB0::16::INSTR (0x02D08828), IO_COMPLETION, 0, IO_COMPLETION, 0x02DA2878)
Process ID: 0x00000874         Thread ID: 0x00000D10
Start Time: 15:31:10.343       Call Duration 00:00:00.000
Status: 0 (VI_SUCCESS)
710. Completing viWriteAsync (GPIB0::16::INSTR (0x02D08828), 0x04045CD1, "ARMOUR IMM;:ARM:TIM...", 65)
Process ID: 0x00000874         Thread ID: 0x00000D10
Start Time: 15:31:10.343       Call Duration 00:00:00.000
Status: 0 (VI_SUCCESS)
Attachments:
Source_Current_Meas_Volt_Single_Read.vi ‏68 KB

The error occurs when the VI code is at the "read single" point of the VI. When I watch the sub VI's, the progression is that under the read single VI, it occurs at the read multiple points VI, and under that VI with error 1073807339 at the Fetch Measurements VI, and under that VI it occurs, with the same error code 1073807339 at the VISA Read and the Property Node. I have attached the spy file with just my program open, and with the Fetch program open.
Attachments:
Capture.spy ‏265 KB
capture with fetch subvi runnning.spy ‏265 KB

UDP with cRIO and error 113

Hi all,
i'm using the UDP protocol to exchange information between a PC and a cRIO; the first is the master, the second is the slave.
In the cRIO i developed a piece of code in order to realize a loopback, so that the message sent from the PC is sent back to the PC itself as it has been received, without any modification.
First, i tried sending a short message (100 B) from the PC to the cRIO; in this case, no problem at all
Then, i tried sending a long message (20 kB) from the PC to the cRIO; in the cRIO code, the error number 113 was raised when trying to send back the message to the PC (calling the UDP write function)
What can be the origin of the different behaviour between the PC and the cRIO? Seems to be a question of buffer size... Can it be dependent of the OS? How can i increase it in the cRIO?
Thanks!
aRCo

Hi aRCo,
According to Wikipedia (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_Datagram_Protocol), the max. theoretical limit for a UDP datagram is 8 bytes for header + 65,527 bytes of data (65,535 bytes in total). However, "the practical limit for the data length which is imposed by the underlying IPv4 protocol is 65,507 bytes (65,535 − 8 byte UDP header − 20 byte IP header)". The wiki article goes on to say that larger packets are possible with Jumbograms.
As for the NI documented limits of 8K, this would appear to be a LabVIEW-imposed limitation. (Perhaps this was related to an earlier limitation of the UDP protocol that has since been upgraded. If I recall correctly, the Windows version of LabVIEW also had this 8K limitation in the past.)
Perhaps NI relaxed this limit, or maybe you have jumbo packets enabled on youir PC, and this is allowing more throughput (-- of course both of these possibilities are only speculation on my part).
In any event, if you limit the UDP packet size to the documented 8K limitation, your code should probably be fine across all LV platforms. (How's that for stating the obvious..?)
Anyway, good luck with your application.
-- Dave
www.movimed.com - Custom Imaging Solutions

Linux error 113

on vmware , we have z box call rman.blobin.biz
I have installed RMNDB on it on port 1571 . listener is also running on this.
I am able to do sqlplus rman/rman@RMNDB.
rman.blobin.biz tnsnames.ora for this DB has following entries.
RMNDB =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = rman.blobin.biz)(PORT = 1571))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = RMNDB)
MODEV =
(DESCRIPTION =
(ADDRESS = (PROTOCOL = TCP)(HOST = moprddb01.blobin.biz)(PORT = 1521))
(CONNECT_DATA =
(SERVER = DEDICATED)
(SERVICE_NAME = MODEV)
from this box I am able to do tnsping RMNDB as well as tnsping MODEV
there is a box moprddb01.blobin.biz which has MODEV
from that box I cna do tnsping MODEV but noy tnsping RMNDB and sqlplus rman/rman@RMNDB.
It gives me error as
ERROR:
ORA-12560: TNS:protocol adapter error
I worked with Oracle and generated Trace.
sqlnet.log is showingLinux 113 error.
Oracle is saying :
You will need to work with your local network admin and sys admin to find out what the problem
is with accessing the rman.blobin.biz node. The restrcition is occurring at the TCP layer as i
ndicated by the Linux 113 error.
we dont have onsite any Linux export or support. I set with network guy we checked port, firewall. it didnt show any issue.
I am really stuck very badly. as there is no Linux guy .
I need to do tnsping RMNDB from MODEV database box.
Any help will be appreciated.

Script started on Thu 24 Apr 2008 08:19:31 AM EDT
[root@rman ~]# uname -a^M
Linux rman.lifecell.biz 2.6.18-53.1.14.el5 #1 SMP Tue Feb 19 07:18:21 EST 2008 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux^M
[root@rman ~]# cat /etc/resolv.conf^M
search lifecell.biz^M
nameserver 172.16.179.202^M
nameserver 172.16.179.203^M
[root@rman ~]# ifconfig^M
eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:50:56:B1:2C:07 ^M
inet addr:172.16.180.47 Bcast:172.16.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0^M
inet6 addr: fe80::250:56ff:feb1:2c07/64 Scope:Link^M
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1^M
RX packets:55229028 errors:33 dropped:36 overruns:0 frame:0^M
TX packets:3874077 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0^M
collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 ^M
RX bytes:1307448164 (1.2 GiB) TX bytes:497502369 (474.4 MiB)^M
Interrupt:177 Base address:0x1400 ^M
^M
lo Link encap:Local Loopback ^M
inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0^M
inet6 addr: ::1/128 Scope:Host^M
UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1^M
RX packets:4497367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0^M
TX packets:4497367 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0^M
collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 ^M
RX bytes:500146185 (476.9 MiB) TX bytes:500146185 (476.9 MiB)^M
[root@rman ~]# service iptables status^M
Table: filter^M
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT)^M
num target prot opt source destination ^M
1 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ^M
^M
Chain FORWARD (policy ACCEPT)^M
num target prot opt source destination ^M
1 RH-Firewall-1-INPUT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ^M
^M
Chain OUTPUT (policy ACCEPT)^M
num target prot opt source destination ^M
^M
Chain RH-Firewall-1-INPUT (2 references)^M
num target prot opt source destination ^M
1 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ^M
2 ACCEPT icmp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 icmp type 255 ^M
3 ACCEPT esp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ^M
4 ACCEPT ah -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 ^M
5 ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 224.0.0.251 udp dpt:5353 ^M
6 ACCEPT udp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 udp dpt:631 ^M
7 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 tcp dpt:631 ^M
8 ACCEPT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state RELATED,ESTABLISHED ^M
9 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:21 ^M
10 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:22 ^M
11 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:443 ^M
12 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:23 ^M
13 ACCEPT tcp -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 state NEW tcp dpt:80 ^M
14 REJECT all -- 0.0.0.0/0 0.0.0.0/0 reject-with icmp-host-prohibited ^M
^M
[root@rman ~]# hostname^M
rman.lifecell.biz^M
[root@rman ~]# cat /etc/hosts^M
# Do not remove the following line, or various programs^M
# that require network functionality will fail.^M
127.0.0.1 rman.lifecell.biz rman localhost.localdomain localhost^M
::1 localhost6.localdomain6 localhost6^M
172.16.180.47 rman.lifecell.biz rman^M
[root@rman ~]# exit^M
Script done on Thu 24 Apr 2008 08:20:38 AM EDT
This is the output

Unity_UMR error 113 &137 Event viewer

i Have problem in unity 7.0 the voice mail not recievied to the user and the error come in event viewer that as per i attached Unity_UMR event ID 113 & 137 so can any help on this issue
Thanks,

Hi Kapil,
This is generally seen if the you have MAPI CDO installed and the Exchange System Manager has not uninstalled Successfully.
A few possible reasons for this problem:
1)Uninstallation on Exchange System Manager or installation of MAPI CDO was done using Microsoft Remote Desktop.
2)There are some leftover dlls of the of the Exchange System Manager in the Unity servers.
Things that you can try to resolve this problem:
++ Use VNC Session to uninstall/install Exchange System Manager and MAPI CDO.
++ Make sure there is no emsabp32.dll and emsmdb32.dll file in the Windows\System32 directory.
++ Windows\system32\mapi32.dll should be at version of 6.5.7654.9 or higher. Or still at version 1.x. Anything in between is no good.
Hope that helps!
Regards,
Saurabh

UDP Error 66

I have two machines running labview, one is sending and one is receiving via udp. They both work well, however as soon as I stop the vi on the receiving machine I get error 66 "the network connection was closed by the peer" on the sending machine. It taws my understanding that UDP doesn’t do error checking, so I shouldn’t be getting this error. Any thoughts? Attached is my udp programs, the server file takes in UDP data from another computer and sends it to the long ez data display.

Something just doesn't look right in your server app. You are opening a single UDP connection, but reading and writing data to the same connection from within the loop. In general, UDP is one directional. One part sends, another part receives. Yet you have the server reading, then writing on the same UDP port reference wire.
I'd suggest taking a closer look again at the UDP example programs.
Be careful with your programming style. In your receiver program, you have the UDP close connection which is actually wired outside of the loop laying on top of the loop as shown by the shadows. That makes it really hard to read what is going on in the program. Also, you have numerous places where wires run backwards. The data on the wires should always flow from left to right and top to bottom. As you have it, it is difficult to tell what wires are inputs to different functions and which are outputs. Many of the structures seem duplicated and could probably be placed into subVI's.

KRB5 use TCP vs UDP error code 52

I am using kerberos JAAS authentication and I am getting an error code of 52. Basically some user ids that I have use a lot of groups and as the information grows it crosses the UDP limit and fails.
Is there a way to configure the JAAS to use TCP instead of UDP.
Thanks,
Varun

Seems like JDK 142 (http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/security/jgss/jgss-features.html) has this support. JDK 142 doc mentions that, it will automatically fallback to TCP if an error is received casue of UDP size limit.
However, I could not get it running successfully with JDK 142 either. JASS module fails with an exception, java.net.SocketException: connection reset. JAAS login module is attempting to use TCP but, for some reason it is failing.
Did it work for anybody? If so, any configurations required to make it work?
Thanks

UDP Error when upgrading from Labview 8.6 to Labview 2009

I recently updgraded from Labview 8.6 to Labview 2009. I am writing an application to stream data to disk from UDP. My VIs run just fine in Labview 8.6, but when I try to run them in Labview 2009 my UDP read times out despite being able to monitor UDP traffic and see that the data is being sent and nothing in the file is changed from 8.6 to 2009. Is there a known issue related to this?

How are you moniting the UDP traffic? Have you verified that the port you are trying to use is actually available? When you installed 2009 there may have been an additional service installed that may have used the port you're trying to use. If you're running on Windows you can use the command "netstat -n -o -a" to see all the ports that are currently in use, as well as the process ID that has that port open.

UDP ERROR 113

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for