UDP Flooding, ip forward-protocol, and service dhcp

I've been reading up on how IOS routers handle DHCP using the "ip helper-address" command and ran across a few different terms / commands that I need help clarifying.
I've found that "ip forward-protocol" is enabled by default for many services, and bootps is enabled by default.
Then there's "service dhcp" which enables the DHCP relay service.
I also see the term "UDP Flooding" mentioned in several places, but can't find any specifics on what this entails.
Can someone please explain how "ip forward-protocol", "service dhcp", and "UDP Flooding" are different, how they interact, etc?
Thanks!
-Mason

When configuring the ip helper-address command, the following broadcast packets will be forwarded by the router by default:
TFTP - port 69
Domain Name System (DNS) - port 53
Time service - port 37
NetBIOS Name Server - port 137
NetBIOS Datagram Server - port 138
Bootstrap Protocol (BOOTP) - port 67
TACACS - port 49
f you do not want all the defaults to be forwarded, issue the no ip forward-protocol command to disable the port from being forwarded by the router, as shown in this example:
router#(config-if)ip helper-address x.x.x.x
router#(config)no ip forward-protocol udp tftpWith these commands, all default User Datagram Protocol (UDP) broadcasts except TFTP broadcasts are forwarded by the router.
Configure the no ip forward-protocol command separately for each port to prevent the port from forwarding the broadcast packets by the router.

Similar Messages

I have a Domain name with email forwarding to my Service Provider which worked very well when I had a PC. Now I have iMac and have changed to IMAP from POP3 so I can sync. between iMac and iPad but how?

I have a Domain name with email forwarding to my Service Provider which worked very well when I had a PC. Now that I have iMac I have changed the account type to IMAP from POP3 so I can sync. between iMac and iPad but how?
I do receive emails into my iMac for which I have 3 email accounts but am struggling on how synchronise between iMac and iPad so that both are up to date at all times. I have also set up a iCloud email account thinking this was the way to go but have drawn a blank.
Any help would be very much appreciated.

Linc Davis,
I have set up my email address both within my iMac and my ISP as IMAP accounts and I receive all emails without problem on my iMac. I have also set up an iCloud email address using my iMac.
I have enabled the email within "setting" on my iPad and have used the iCloud account. I have sent emails from the iMac to iPad using the iCloud account address and vice versa. I have also sent emails from the iPad to the iMac using my non-iCloud email address and they have gotten through.
The one thing I would like to have is for the iPad "mail" mailboxes to mimic the iMac "mail" mailboxes and both to be "in sync". I am not really interested in using the iCloud email address for my email but would really like to use my "normal" addresses as these are what most people know me by.
Do I need to set additional accounts within the iPad which are the same as the email accounts I have within the iMac and my ISP? I have reached the end of my knowledge as regards email synchronsing.
Thanks

Port forwarding 1941 and Comcast

I have my 1941 router connected to my Comcast Modem on G0/0. I have a 3560 connected to G0/1. The router is handling my DHCP duties.
I have a HAI Omnipro ii (Security/Home Automation) that I would like to access remotely. It has an IP address of 172.31.101.10 and uses port 4369.
I am at a loss on how to configure remote access to my OmniPro. If I browse to "WhatIsMyIp" it shows it being 98.224.42.53.
But when I configured the router I used the following.
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
ip address 172.31.101.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
ip forward-protocol nd
no ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat source list 101 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
ip nat inside source list 101 interface GigabitEthernet0/0 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 67.190.192.1
access-list 101 permit ip any any
access-list 101 permit ip 172.31.101.0 0.0.0.255 any
Can someone point me in the right direction?
Thank you,

Hi ,
The IP address which you see in your browser ( f I browse to "WhatIsMyIp" it shows it being 98.224.42.53.) is not going to be static for you all the time , whenever you reboot the router or service restart their modem the IP address assigned to you will be lost .
with below ip address you can do port-forwarding but this will not be permanent this will work for short time until IP address is assigned to you , Use below command on your router
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.31.101.10 4369 98.224.42.53 4369
HTH
Sandy
ip nat inside source static tcp 172.31.101.10 4369 171.68.1.1 80 extendable

Windows DHCP Server and Linux DHCP Relay Agent

We are trying to organize a VLAN (say VLAN 1) for guests who must be assigned IP addresses from a DHCP server in a different VLAN (VLAN 2). This DHCP server is configured with two scopes - 172.16.0.0/24 (for VLAN 2) and 172.16.4.0/24 (for the Guests
VLAN 1). The DHCP server successfully distributes addresses to clients in its VLAN (it has the IP address 172.16.0.2). For the clients in the other VLAN a DHCP Relay Agent has been setup on the router. It is DHCRELAY running on Linux (CentOS) which has
been configured to accept the DHCPDISCOVER broadcasts coming on the VLAN1 interface of the router and forward these to the DHCP server. The IP address of the VLAN1 interface of the router is 172.16.4.254 and on the VLAN2 interface - 172.16.0.254
The problem is that the DHCP server won't respond with a DHCPOFFER message to the relay agent. I have traced the frames on the router and on the DHCP server. They arrive on the DHCP server with the correct GIADDR of the relay agent. According to all documentation,
if a scope has been configured on the DHCP server and it receives a unicast message with the GIADDR set by a relay agent that matches one of the configured scopes, the DHCP server must send a unicast DHCPOFFER to the relay agent. But it doesn't.
Here is what Wireshark reports (ignore the Destination port unreachable messages, the DHCP service was stopped at the time Wireshark was running)
When the service is running, there are just DHCPDISCOVERs - no OFFER. You can see that the server has the two scopes configured:
The relay agent seems to work normally - it forwards the DHCPDISCOVERs to the server continuously (tried many times with ipconfig /renew on the client).
I read many posts about this problem. Some users had other services running on the DHCP server that used the DHCP port, but I don't have such an issue (you see that when the service is stopped, an ICMP port unreachable is sent which is correct). Others however
did not find a solution. Am I missing something? Is there something specific when using the DHCRELAY agent from DHCPD? Can I turn on some verbose logging to track this down? Thanks in advance.

WIth DHCP, there is really nothing to configure. If the Relay Agent/IP Helper is pointing to it, and the VLAN subnet exactly matches the scope subnet, then it should just work.
What I've seen in the VLAN config is either a static route back to the subnet the DHCP server itself is sitting on is not configured or incorrectly configured, or there are ports blocked (need UDP, too, since that's what DHCP uses to pass the OFFER), and
other necessary ports are opened, then it should just work.
Sometimes NIC teaming on the DHCP server will cause it. Not sure. Microsoft doesn't support teaming prior to Windwos 2012, but it doesn't mean that it doesn't work. Don't get me wrong, teaming works nicely, but they just don't support it because they never
certified the drivers, that's all.
The issues I've seen with DHCP relays and VLANs in the forums are usually based on misconfigs in the VLAN or ports blocked. Sometimes we'll refer to call Microsoft Support for specific, hands-on assistance. And searching the threads, from what
I've found that if they did call support, they've never posted back what the problem was based on or the resolution. I can post a couple of them for you to read through, but there were never any response with the actual resolution.
If you like, you also have the option to contact Microsoft Support. Here's a list of phone numbers if you choose this option:
http://support.microsoft.com/contactus/
Ace Fekay
MVP, MCT, MCITP/EA, MCTS Windows 2008/R2 & Exchange 2007, Exchange 2010 EA, MCSE & MCSA 2003/2000, MCSA Messaging 2003
Microsoft Certified Trainer
Microsoft MVP - Directory Services
Technical Blogs & Videos: http://www.delawarecountycomputerconsulting.com/
This post is provided AS-IS with no warranties or guarantees and confers no rights.

NetBoot and Multiple DHCP Servers

Hey everyone,
We have a NetBoot machine running here at my school (where I work). It was working like a champ until a couple of weeks ago when our network got upgraded and there are now 2 DHCP servers on our network. That, for some reason, is totally screwing up our NetBooting process.
Here's what I think is happening, and maybe someone can tell me if I right or wrong. NetBoot (or BSDP protocol) is a "broadcast" protocol. (That means it's always just floating around out there on the network. ) NetBoot (BSDP) protocol gets injected into the DHCP stream, and any machine that gets DHCP can get BSDP, and essentially NetBoot.
The problem is with BSDP. BSDP protocol wants to have all of it's "broadcasts" come from the same server. So when we had 1 DHCP server, everything was fine, because client machines would get their whole NetBoot process from one machine... all of the BSDP broadcasts were coming from our 1 DHCP server.
Now, we have 2 DHCP servers. What happens is, a client will get some of it's BSDP broadcasts from one DHCP server, and some from another... which it does not like at all.
I recently read somewhere that it is possible to somehow make one of our DHCP servers the "authoritative" server, to which all of the clients will go to get their NetBooting info.
Does this sound in any way right? Are we on the right track ? Has anyone seen this before? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks a million.
Mike

Now, we have 2 DHCP servers. What happens is, a
a client will get some of it's BSDP broadcasts from
one DHCP server, and some from another... which it
does not like at all.
Not unless your new DHCP server is also a NetBoot server and is set to provide NetBoot services. BSDP and DHCP are not the same thing. If what you were saying were true, it wouldn't be possible to have DHCP and NetBoot offered by different servers.
It IS possible, however, that the two DHCP servers are causing problems by both servicing DHCP requests for the same clients. If you've got multiple DHCP servers on the same subnet (or your router's configured to pass DHCP requests between subnets), you should make sure that only one of the DHCP servers answers requests from any given client. In our world, our Novell server is the default DHCP server on our subnet, but I keep a list of excluded MAC addresses on that server so that my Macintosh clients don't get addresses from it. On the Mac OS X server, I'm careful to limit my address ranges only to those machines which have static address maps in NetInfo. That way, our servers coexist, but they don't overlap.
It's not clear from your message whether your previously solitary DHCP server was your Mac OS X server, or whether one of the two DHCP servers is that box. But whatever the servers are, it might be helpful to turn off one of them to see if the same problem occurs (assuming you can, without major network disruptions). If that's not possible, can you talk to your network admins to see if there's some way to isolate your clients and one of the servers--in other words, see if there's some way to keep DHCP servers from responding to the same requests.
There may be any number of other reasons why this problem has cropped up. You may need to dust off a hub and a copy of Ethereal or EtherPeek to sniff what's happening on the network. You might also try NetBooting in verbose mode, to see where the process craps out. IIRC, there'a decent guide for this kind of troubleshooting over at Bombich's site (www.bombich.com).
Good luck.
David Walton

Port Forwarding Protocol Doesn't Save W330N Gaming Router

When trying to forward ports on the Single Port Forwarding setup page I cannot change the protocol to anything besides TCP. I can select "both" or "UDP" but after I click save and the page reloads the setting is reverted back to TCP. Is there something that stops this setting from working? Is there a way around this problem? When using the Range setup I change the protocol and save the setting, but then I can only forward a limited number of ports. Is there a bug in the software?

Hi.
Yeah,may be it's a bug,but upgrade the firmware and reset the router and configurate it again.It should b work
Good Luck!!!
Thanks
Kind Regards
ing.George Gochev
DSL and Telecommunications Engineer

Setup 2 ISPs 1st Static IP and 2nd DHCP

hi all. i have 2 ISPs 1st ISP provides Static IP and 2nd ISP provides dynamic IP. i want to setup router as all HTTP, HTTPs, SMTP, POP traffic go though 2nd ISP and remaining traffice go through 1st ISP. if 2nd ISP goes down then HTTP, HTTPs, SMTP, POP go through 1st ISP.
Thanks,

Hi,
Please see following config, if i allow 80 on 1st ISP (Fa 0/0/0) then browsing works, but it does not work on 2nd ISP (Fa 0/0/1).
track 10 ip sla 1 reachability
delay down 1 up 1
track 20 ip sla 2 reachability
delay down 1 up 1
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
no ip address
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.3
description Voice-Vlan
encapsulation dot1Q 3
ip address 192.168.3.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.4
description Servers-&-Switches-Vlan
encapsulation dot1Q 4
ip address 192.168.4.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
interface GigabitEthernet0/0.5
description NCS-Vlan
encapsulation dot1Q 5
ip address 192.168.5.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly in
ip policy route-map PBR
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
no ip address
shutdown
duplex auto
speed auto
media-type rj45
interface FastEthernet0/0/0
description "Nexlinx Fiber Link 2Mbps"
ip address 116.58.63.34 255.255.255.248
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
interface FastEthernet0/0/1
ip address dhcp
ip nat outside
ip virtual-reassembly in
duplex auto
speed auto
ip forward-protocol nd
ip http server
no ip http secure-server
ip nat inside source route-map Nexlinx-nat interface FastEthernet0/0/0 overload
ip nat inside source route-map PTCL-nat interface FastEthernet0/0/1 overload
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 116.58.63.33 track 10
ip access-list extended acl_Nexlinx
deny tcp any any eq www
deny tcp any any eq 443
deny tcp any any eq smtp
deny tcp any any eq 995
permit tcp any any
ip access-list extended acl_PTCL
permit tcp any any eq www
permit tcp any any eq 443
permit tcp any any eq smtp
permit tcp any any eq 995
deny tcp any any
ip sla 1
icmp-echo 116.58.63.33 source-interface FastEthernet0/0/0
threshold 500
timeout 500
frequency 3
ip sla schedule 1 life forever start-time now
ip sla 2
icmp-echo 192.168.1.1 source-interface FastEthernet0/0/1
threshold 500
timeout 500
frequency 3
route-map Nexlinx-nat permit 10
match ip address acl_Nexlinx
match interface FastEthernet0/0/0
route-map PBR permit 10
match ip address acl_PTCL
set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.1.1 10 track 10
set ip next-hop verify-availability 116.58.63.33 20 track 20
route-map PBR permit 20
match ip address acl_Nexlinx
set ip next-hop verify-availability 116.58.63.33 10 track 20
set ip next-hop verify-availability 192.168.1.1 20 track 10
set ip next-hop 116.58.63.33
route-map PTCL-nat permit 20
match ip address acl_PTCL
match interface FastEthernet0/0/1

Looking for a client/server that supports multiple protocol and delivery

Hi all, I don't know if this the right place to ask my question,here it goes.
I am looking to develop a client-server that supports multiple protocols such as HTTP, HTTPS etc. I am looking for a framework( i don't know if that is correct or I need some kind of web-service (soap etc)) that would manage connection, security etc. I would like to like to devote most of my time in developing business objects with multiple delivery mechanism such as sending serilized java objects, xml message or soap message, or in some case JMS message as well. So I need a client server that can come in via TCP/IP or HTTP or anyother industry standard protocol and I should be able to service him with pub/sub model and also request/response model as well.
I don't know if I had explained what I need, I would like to know what technologies I should be evaluating and which direction I should be heading... Also the server I'm developing should be free of Java constraints if needed...
Also this service is not webbased service as now but if need arises I should have a flexibilty to make them web enabled in future. Also I would like to work with open source webservers or appservers if I need

Inxsible wrote:I installed i3 - along with the i3status - which I still have to figure out. I am liking what I see as of now. It reminds me of wmii -- when I used it way back when. However I do not like the title bar. I would much rather prefer a 1 px border around the focused window.
"i3 was created because wmii, our favorite window manager at the time, didn't provide some features we wanted (multi-monitor done right, for example), had some bugs, didn't progress since quite some time and wasn't easy to hack at all (source code comments/documentation completely lacking). Still, we think the wmii developers and contributors did a great job. Thank you for inspiring us to create i3. "
To change the border of the current client, you can use bn to use the normal border (including window title), bp to use a 1-pixel border (no window title) and bb to make the client borderless. There is also bt which will toggle the different border styles.
Examples:
bindsym Mod1+t bn
bindsym Mod1+y bp
bindsym Mod1+u bb
or put in your config file
new_window bb
from: http://i3.zekjur.net/docs/userguide.html (you probably already found that by now )

Ports required for communication between Web servers and service applications (the default is HTTP)

We're using SharePoint 2010, I'm the system admin for a SharePoint farm. We enabled SharePoint Search by adding a Search Service APplication. One of the crawl report timer job is failing every 5 minte with the error "Cannot connect to remote server".
After digging around, we found that the server running the timer job tries to connect to the SearchAdmin.svc on the index server, over HTTPS / port 32844 However, communication over SSL via a non default port is blocked by our firewall.
According to this article: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262849.aspx the default is HTTP for communication
between web servers. How is it possible that it's trying to connect over SSL?

Hi,
Quoted from
https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc262849.aspx#ServiceApp :
You can change the protocol and port binding for each service application. On the Service Applications page in Central Administration, select the service application, and then click
Publish.
Here is an article for configuring Windows firewall port rules for SharePoint using PowerShell in case you need:
http://www.xylos.com/default.aspx?id=1050
Regards,
Rebecca Tu
TechNet Community Support
Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
[email protected]

Route mail and Active Directory Sites and Services configuration

Folks,
I have a problem in the internal email routing. My network is spread across various regions and the branch offices are connected together in a mpls network (full mesh). Every region has its own Exchange Server with all roles installed and the smtp connection
to the outside world is linked to two Exchange servers in the headquarter server farm.
The problem is that internally I often see emails going across the Exchange Servers in the branch offices where there is low bandwidth (from 3 to 5 Mbps), thus email are sent first to these servers instead of going immediately to the Exchange hosting
the mailboxes of the intended recipients. This happens also with inbound emails.
This causes slowness in the email system and sometimes also the network with these branch offices suffers from packet loss or very high latency.
I know that Exchange is a site-aware application and uses the Active Directory topology for message routing and to communicate with the services that are running on other Exchange 2013 computers. For this reason I have checked the Active Directory Sites
and Services and surprisingly I have found that there are no sites, no subnets, nothing has been defined but the default settings, included the Inter-Sites transport which contains the default DEFAULTIPSITELINK.
Apart from the fact that clients use logon servers which are not supposed to use in the far remote offices, I am concerned of changing the Exchange Infrastructure whilst the email system is running and I would like to ask your opinion about my next steps:
1) Create subnets for every office
2) Create sites and then link them to the subnets done in point 1
3) Delete the DEFAULTIPSITELINK and create new site links based on the costs (network speed) in order to determine the best routing server. I have 5 remote offices with 5 different network bandwidth, so I'll have to create 5 IP site links: high cost for
link with slow network, low cost for fast network.
4) (Optional) Configure the Exchange-specific cost using the Set-AdSiteLink cmdlet to the AD IP site links created previously
Apart from the valid questions on why the previous Exchange Administrator have forgotten to set up the Active Directory (Topology) Sites and Services...
...And why have chosen to install all Exchange Roles to each server when there was no reason to do that (there are two servers connected to the external smtp gateways in the headquarter, so in my opinion the Exchange Servers in the remote branch offices
should have had only the mailbox and the cas role)...
As a matter of fact, my idea is to go further and create the sites,subnets and the ip site link. If I still notice a wrong email flow, I can configure an ad-hoc Exchange-specific cost using the Set-AdSiteLink cmdlet. Does this sound reasonable to you guys
or I am taking the wrong decisions?
Thanks

Thank you very much for your link. This is exactly the page I have read just before posting my question here. It is not easy for me to understand why this has been setup this way by a Microsoft certified engineer.
There are specific rules to follow when Active Directory and Exchange are located in multiple sites and I am not a skilled Exchange Administrator... he keeps saying that it is correct and also tells that if I go forward with my ideas there is the
risk to increase the level of complexity. I prefer more complexity than default setting, and as a consequence of that, connectivity problems!
Hopefully everything goes well. I will post my results here once I have done the changes
Regards

UDP Flood to Host when iPhone connected to WiFi

Have been bothered with this issue for weeks now and finally decided to ask for help. Any suggestion is highly appreciated.
When my iPhone (and my wife's) are connected to the home (WiFi) network, there's a seemingly random amount of UDP Flood to Host errors in my router's security log, at random times. Because of this, the router goes into 300 sec lock-down, wherefore obviously no internet.
Using iPhone console and my router's security log doesn't provide any clear insight on what app or other configuration on the iPhone triggers this. It even happens at night when both we and our phones are supposed to be asleep. There is a slight pattern noticable when in 80% of the cases the UDP Flood is preceded by a "Sending ACK" to my iPhone.
I'm quite certain it's related to the iPhone. E.g. this morning I kept my WiFi on the phone switched off and used the internet on my notebook non-stop without any problem. The moment I turn on WiFi on my iPhone this happens:
01/02/2011 15:22:31 **UDP Flood to Host** 86.89.201.51, 32768->> 195.121.1.66, 53 (from ATM1 Outbound)
01/02/2011 15:22:31 **UDP Flood to Host** 86.89.201.51, 32768->> 195.121.1.34, 53 (from ATM1 Outbound)
01/02/2011 15:16:27 **UDP Flood to Host** 86.89.201.51, 32768->> 195.121.1.66, 53 (from ATM1 Outbound)
01/02/2011 15:16:27 **UDP Flood to Host** 86.89.201.51, 32768->> 195.121.1.34, 53 (from ATM1 Outbound)
Additional info: iPhone is iOS 4.2.1, router is Sitecom WL-304 with latest firmware installed and firewall activated. The 195.121.1.34 and .66 IP's are the DNS servers of my provider. And that it is ALWAYS port 32768. Nevertheless when I scan for action on this port using a variety of port checkers, they all say it's closed/not listening, safe, etc.
Message was edited by: Arjen Bos

I seem to be having the exactly the same problem.
I have iPhone 4, my daughter a touch, also we have iPad as well as three wireless laptops, one wii, two ps3's all connecting wirelessly to the router - Philips sna6500. Not of course all are using the system at once!
Everything was all fine until about two - three weeks ago. Apart from us adding a ps3 to the mix in the last week, I've not changed anything.
So having read a few things, I reset the router and then slowly turning things onto to connect. As soon as used iPhone 4 it caused this udp flood statement in my security log
**UDP Flood to Host** 95.148.173.9, 32768->>193.36.79.100, 53 (from ATM1 Outbound)
Having read the reply to the earlier you can see it's the same DNS 53.
What's also made me think is I visited relatives over Christmas and my iPhone kept on dropping the connection.
So I think there is an app or recent update that's causing this problem.
Since turning off the iPhone connection to the wireless at home, it's not throwing up this error and I'm not getting access problems from my other wireless devices.
So is it my iPhone or router at fault?
Any ideas on what apps could be causing this?
If factory reset, potentially it would get rid of problem but I have to rebuild my phone again. If I backup and restore, it will restore all. So would it be your recommendation be to sync to iTunes, screen shoot all home pages on iPhone so know what specifically on my phone, and remove all non-apps, then slow add them back on, of course making sure the base system works ok.
Steve

[svn] 4494: Added tests to hit channels and services configuration exceptions

Revision: 4494
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2009-01-12 16:12:09 -0800 (Mon, 12 Jan 2009)
Log Message:
Added tests to hit channels and services configuration exceptions
checkintests: passed
Added Paths:
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/channels/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/channels/DuplicateIdTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/channels/DuplicateIdTest/error.t xt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/channels/DuplicateIdTest/service s-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/channels/InvalidIdTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/channels/InvalidIdTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/channels/InvalidIdTest/services- config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/BadDefaultChannelTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/BadDefaultChannelTest/e rror.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/BadDefaultChannelTest/s ervices-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/DuplicateDefTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/DuplicateDefTest/error. txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/DuplicateDefTest/servic es-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/DuplicateDefaultAdapter Test/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/DuplicateDefaultAdapter Test/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/DuplicateDefaultAdapter Test/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/IncorrectRootElementTes t/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/IncorrectRootElementTes t/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/IncorrectRootElementTes t/messaging-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/IncorrectRootElementTes t/services-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/InvalidAdapterIdTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/InvalidAdapterIdTest/er ror.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/InvalidAdapterIdTest/se rvices-config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/InvalidIdTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/InvalidIdTest/error.txt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/InvalidIdTest/services- config.xml
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/NoClassAttrTest/
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/NoClassAttrTest/error.t xt
blazeds/trunk/qa/apps/qa-regress/testsuites/config/tests/services/NoClassAttrTest/service s-config.xml

my connectivity is okay, I'm getting errors from domain controller itself, I checked and the network is okay, but for the record here is my ipconfig /all
Windows IP Configuration
   Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : server
   Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : ***.tk
   Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
   IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
   DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : ***.tk
Ethernet adapter Ethernet:
   Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
   Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Intel(R) 82574L Gigabit Network Connectio
n
   Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-0C-29-32-7E-79
   DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
   Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
   IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 213.233.***.***(Preferred)
   Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
   Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 213.233.***.1
   DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 127.0.0.1
   NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled

Download issues with Forward, Reply and Edit

i donwloaded new email feature Forward, Reply and Edit. the whole process went fine. user has to send an email to one of his contacts to get this service activated. i did the same but i keep on getting a message 'Tunnel Failed'. dont know what that means. the email is sent but the application doesnt get activated.
can anyone advise me what the issue is and how to resolve it?
Thanks

I read reviews of this app at http://appworld.blackberry.com/webstore/content/2813/?countrycode=US&lang=en
and someone mentioned the smae issue you are having.
"When it works its great. Doesn't work when you have an attachment. Too often just gives you an email with the word 'null'.
I would check with the vendor.
I also referenced
http://crackberry.com/free-forward-reply-and-edit-application
Please click the Thumbs Up icon if this comment has helped you!
If your issue is resolved, please click the solution button on the resolution!
Every BlackBerry should have BlackBerry Protect, get it now! | Follow me on Twitter | Bring Back BBM Music!

I received 2 texts from notice.verizon-wireless and service.verizon-wireless, saying my account had been "BLOCKED!" for my security. Is this a scam or for real? What should I do?

I received 2 texts from notice.verizon-wireless and service.verizon-wireless, saying my account had been "BLOCKED!" for my security. Is this a scam or for real? What should I do?

Try to log in to your account from your computer. If it's locked, call customer service (800-922-0204). If you can log in and all looks normal, forward the texts to SPAM (7726).

Forward By Reroute Service Parameter

Hi
Forward By Reroute service parameter is disable but CUCM still tries to forward by reroute on a QSIG trunk.
Somebody knows why?
CUCM version 8.6.2.22900-9
Thanks

Service parameters are appended to the service url. Thus, if your service url is http://myserver/path/app.asp and you have a service parameter called userId, and the user calling the service configured userId to be 'mylogin', then the phone would call the appliation as follows:
http://myserver/path/app.asp?userId=mylogin
So you can extract those parameters like any querystring parameter.

UDP Flooding, ip forward-protocol, and service dhcp

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for