UK Payroll PU12 Issues

Hello Friends:   I have issues in UK Payroll PU12.  Wage types in SAP are not going to Ceridian file.  Mostly happening with IT0014 wagetypes.  I noticed that if I generate the File layout in PU12 then the wage types are going to Ceridian file.  However, not advisable to generate the FileLayout without Code changes in PU12.  Is there anyway I can resolve this.  Any help is greatly appreciated. 

Hi - just had a new iphone4 delivered. I have also been waiting for about 3 hours now for activation. From what i have researched it can take anywhere between 1 and 48 hours to activate (seems a bit extreme in this instant modern world!)
If you are upgrading form an iphone 3G or 3Gs (like me) - apparently the simm activation is automatic after you have connected and synced from your itunes. So you shouldn't need to do anything.
There is a page on the o2 website that allows you to manually transfer to the new mini simm: http://swapmysim.o2.co.uk/simswap/swap/validatempn
But even this does not speed up the process, it can still take a while... I'll let you know how long it it eventually took.

Similar Messages

  • PU12 Transaction: Mutilple Payroll Area Issue

    Dear All,
    I am going under very strange issue with PU12 transaction. This transaction runs fine and export payroll data if a person is hired only in one Payroll Area.
    Like, if a employee E123456 is hired under Payroll Area - 99  and if this is still under that payroll area in HR-Infotype 1 THEN PU12 will work fine.
    If employee is transferred to some other payroll area - 01. So this time Infotype 1 will have two record - Initial Hired Payroll 99 (delimited) record and current Payroll Area 01 record.
    When PU12 transaction starts for this employee it only will run for Initial Payroll Area (in this case 99). Whatever the data under Payroll Area 99 time span will only get processed.
    Whatever the data will come under new Payroll Area 01, it will not get processes.
    Is there something missing in configuration side or something to be added explicitly?
    Thanks,
    Roshan
    Edited by: Roshan Gupta on Feb 9, 2011 1:39 PM

    Hi Mahesh,
    Thanks for the reply. But the link gives good information about configuration of PU12. The scenario I have raised, it doesn't help to understand that. But its good reference guide and I already had that. Can you please help me to understand what could be the reason of the mentioned problem.
    Thanks,
    Roshan

  • Payroll retro issue - related to /563

    Hi PY experts,
    Problem:
    I have one PY retro issue.
    Issue reported in December  is :-  One employee has a /563 claim of $18.45 (Claim from prev mth). 
    Why is here a deduction shown for this payslip?.
    Issue reported in Jan 2010 is :- same employee has $99.3 (Claim from prev mth).
    My analysis and details are as follows:-
    December retro triggered for Oct,Nov.
    Jan 10-retro triggered for June 09 onwards.
    /561(amt employee owes to employer) in Nov in December run:- 18.45.
    /561 in Nov in Jan'10 run:-117.75
    So,
    /563(claims from previous month) in December in december run:-18.45
    /563 in December in Jan'10 run:-117.75
    So,
    99.30 SGD shown in Jan 2010 is the difference between the figures which was displayed in the last month.Ies (117.75 - 18.45 ) =99.30 .
    -But my understanding is /561 will get formulated only in case  the /110+/550 is negative.
    But in this employee's scenario this amount is not coming as negative.Then how /561 is getting formulated even though( /110+/550 ) is not negative?
    There is only difference between different runs of payroll of /101 . here is no difference in /110 amounts for same months in different runs.
    So retro triggered thru the payment wage types(Cumilation 01).So I have run the wage type reoprt for comparing these wage types.(I can fwd this to email)
    My doubts /help required areas are :-
    1) How   /561 is getting formulated even though( /110+/550 ) is not negative?
    2) I can forward the details in proper excel format(easy to compare kind) -monthly wage type  comparison report
    which is related to (/101) wise reoprt , pls help me to find out how the exact amount is getting formulated.
    Regards
    Thomas
    Edited by: tomspadiyara on Jan 10, 2010 7:00 AM
    Edited by: tomspadiyara on Jan 11, 2010 3:19 AM

    Hi,
    I got the answers for the questions..
    Can anybody pls help me by a document how all the technical wage types are getting formulated: ies
    /140
    /254 etc etc kind
    This will help me for a faster derivation of the figure came in /563

  • UK Payroll :Pension issue

    Hi Experts,
    This is related to Additional Voluntary contributions.When an employee is on whole month unpaid leave and there is an entry in InfoType 71,Additional Voluntary Contributions,Flat rate,this is calculated and shown on the payslip although the emp doesnt have sufficient amount (as he is on unapid leave whole month).
    We tried putting the wage type in the arrears table(V_T51P6)So that it will not deduct that amount for the month he is on unpaid leave but still its deducting.
    Any help on this would be appreciated with higher points?
    Thanks in Advance,
    Dharani

    Hello
    Please refer to the SPRO node of the IMG,where you need to maintain the entries for the pension scheme implementation.
    Payroll>payroll great britain>Pension Schemes.
    Here you need to maintain all required customising for the pension schemes.
    Band numbers are used in the calculation of Percentage and Mixed-rate Pension Scheme contributions
    Pension Band Level.
    The band levels divide the pensionable pay into bands. The band levels can be set at the figures of your own choice.
    The band levels are used in the case of Percentage Pension Schemes to calculate the percentage contribution amounts from each band.
    With a Mixed-Rate Pension Scheme either a flat-rate or a percentage contribution will be calculated from each band of the employee's salary.
    Regards

  • Payroll Period Issue

    Dear Gurus,
                        In Payrol Control Record
    If i put Payroll Period 12 2009  01.03.2010 - 31.03.2010
    & Earliest retro acctg period       12 2009  01.04.2009
    Save then if i  change Payroll Status Release Mode then
    Payroll period               01 1976  01.01.1976 - 30.04.1976 is coming which is wrong.
    Please Advised why is coming wrong
    Regards
    MHPO

    Patil
    Check the Period parameter and date modifier 
    and check the assigment of the above said parameters with the pay roll area in table V_T549A 
    later generate the Pay roll periods and check
    there might be some in consistency while generateing the pay roll periods

  • Payroll initialization issue

    Dear all
    i got a error when i am running payroll.
    error text is
    This is a live client
    No check performed against control record
    payroll cancelled
    Scenario is like this:
    simulation is working fine, no modification in control records, only usual release no such error in past.
    And this is a critical period as i have to run now.
    Thx

    Hi
    Did you done something in Schema?
    Check the program Hincalc0.
    Check where is the error text and what is a problem.
    Reply if any hints or problem .
    <b>Reminder : Points should be given on answers.</b>

  • Adhoc query - Total payroll day issue on infotype 2001

    Dear Expert,
    I am working on the adhoc query and would like to generate the total number of payroll days taken by a particular employee.
    E.g. Employee A has 4 leave record in Nov 2011
    14-Nov, 16, Nov, 23 Nov, 25 Nov
    When I select the reporting period between 1-Nov-2011 to 30-Nov-2011, the total payroll days generated by the adhoc query is only 1. I am not sure why. Please help
    Best Regards,
    WF

    Hi,
    Might be remaining days are Non working days/Weekly offs/ Holidays falls..
    You Better Check through PA30 Overview of Absence records, Whether the Days are deducted from Quota or not.
    Need to check absence class in V_554s_0

  • Benefits Rates ( IT0167/IT0168) not feeding through PU12.

    Hi experts,
    I know this question was asked before but no reply so far from
    any one.
    My issue is We are currently running PU12 export and using ZTMU
    (copy of standard OTMU interface format).I am interested in
    knowing how companies handle the issue of benefits when rates
    increase.  The benefit fields in IT0167 and IT0168 are
    calculated fields based on various parameters, i.e.. BSAL and
    rates of coverage and calculations for premiums.  They
    dynamically will update in IT0167 and IT0168 if there is a rate
    increase, but PU12 does not recognize this as a change and it
    does not get picked up.  I believe this is because the info type
    itself does not  change, no date change -- only the calculated
    field.  Can any one give me some information on how this should
    be addressed in the export? This is a payroll impacting issue.
    If  someone has any resolution please so send it to me at
    [email protected]
    Any reply's or any clues in resolving this issue are much
    appreciated.
    Thank you,
    Madhu

  • SAP HR Support Gurus ,,,,,Help Reqd

    Hello Gurus,
    Im Pradeep, SAP Certified now getting into SAP HR Support team as a team member.
    *So anySupport Guru out thr,can u pls let me knw wat r the general queries handled or solved by a SAP HR Support Consultant n wat r those queries which i hav concentrate more on.
    If u can give ur contact details with the suggestion it wl b appreciated, so tat i can contact you for more details.
    Thanks in Advance
    Pradeep

    Hi Pradeep,
    I think you might have got the scenario regarding the support project.Hence I want to give some inputs.
    Support itself gives the meanning what our role is ..! And we , being a support consultant have to solve the issues that has been arised to end users or to the business.
    It all depends on the end users ( if they are been trained well then issues will be less) and the implementation consultant( if he had implemented with utmost care and with proper documentation).
    Most of the issues will be from end users who dont know how to import or how to enter data.And if they see any error message also, they will raise a ticket (issues tracker).
    Also some times we will get payroll related issues where we have to act very fast and resolve the issue cause it will impact the payroll.
    And on a daily basis , issues may be on OM as they can be related to structural authorizations or any data related problem..
    So i can say , it all depends on Client and the end user and also based on the Business.
    Do let me know if you are not satisfied or still have any queries .
    Regards,
    Sri
    Reward if satisfied.......

  • Is it possible to have access to PU12 in read only to avoid SOD issues?

    Hi
    We would like to provide PU12 to a small number of users for troubleshooting purposes with our payroll interface, however PU12 transaction is one that is a SOD issue, namely: 'Modify payroll master data and then process payroll.  Potential for fraudulent activity'
    Is there an equivalent read only transaction that SAP has to view the export history data possibly, or else a way to change the settings of PU12 to make it read only via a custom tcode?
    Any advice would be very helpful.
    Thanks
    Nicola

    Hi,
    Make the variant of the screen and provide the separate Tcode using SE93.
    Good Luck
    Om

  • Issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of

    Dear Experts,
    I have an issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of the Month.
    One employee was retired on 29th of March, so his payroll area was changed from biweekly to monthly on 29th. For retire we are running the payroll on 8th of every month. When we are running payroll for April he has received only 29th and 30th retire salary, by the time he is not yet retired also.
    In this case the main problem is monthly payroll time is early then biweekly. so the employee is getting retire salary then his regular pay.
    Can you guide me where we can control that monthly payroll area should not be triggered at this movement.
    Thanks
    Chandra

    You can do that but it is not that easy as it sounds if you have to do that over a period of say 10-20 years...lot of operational work!!
    Also say if you load the retiree action one month ahead say on 03/01/2011. And the employee is retiring on  03/29.
    Retire payroll is on 04/08
    Biweekly is on 04/15
    Now you decide to lock the employees after the 1st biweekly check of March...say which was process 14 days before 04/15 would be 04/01. The employee number is locked between 04/01 to 04/15. For 14 days you have locked these employees!!
    What happens if there is adjustment pay...you have to manually go and unlock the employee and lock him after the adjustment check.
    I will let you decide based on the comfort, SAP effort, Operational effort and system maintenance.

  • Issue on Changing the Payroll Area in Mid of the Month from Biweekly to Mon

    Dear Experts,
    I have an issue on payroll area which is changing from biweekly to monthly in Mid of the Month.
    One employee was retired on 29th of March, so his payroll area was changed from biweekly to monthly on 29th. For retire we are running the payroll on 8th of every month. When we are running payroll for April he has received only 29th and 30th retire salary, by the time he is not yet retired also.
    In this case the main problem is monthly payroll time is early then biweekly. so the employee is getting retire salary then his regular pay.
    Can you guide me where we can control that monthly payroll area should not be triggered at this movement.
    Thanks
    Chandra

    Hi Dilek,
    If splits will be there definitely there will be two wagetypes but the amounts they'll have will be based on the rates of those periods.
    Suppose an employee got payscale increase on 11th of  the month, then employee will be paid at the rate of first payscale for first ten days then @ of second payscale on second 20 days.
    So there won't be any inconsistency.
    Regards,
    Tomesh

  • Mid Month Transfer Issue in Payroll

    Hello All
    Good Day!
    We have two payrolls defined, Payroll A and Payroll B and both has separate Legal entity but Business Group for both Payroll is same. We are having an issue when employee transfers from Payroll A to B or vice versa as mentioned below :
    1) Lets assume Employee transfers from Payroll A to Payroll B as on 17 Oct 2012.
    2) As Business Group is same , employee remain in the same BG.
    3) So we tried to terminate the employee as on 17-Oct-2012 and re-hired as on 18-Oct-2012 in the Payroll B. We need two IRP5 (tax certificate) so we need to terminate the employee from one payroll and reinstate in new payroll.
    4)) We have most of the recurring element configured to Terminate as Last Standard Process so all the recurring elements ended as on 31-Oct-2012, i think this should have been Actual Termination Date but as Payroll is running from last 2 years so this will be too big to change now.
    5) Now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee got full month salary in Payroll A which is not correct as employee worked up to 17-Oct-2012.
    6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
    Could you please provide your input as what is the best practice to handle this mid month transfer ?
    Thanks
    Gaurav

    Hi, Gaurav..
    6) To avoid full month Salary, we changed the Last Standard Process to 17-Oct-2012 so all elements ended as on 17-Oct-2012 but now when we process the payroll as on 31-Oct-2012, employee is getting picked up but no element processed and no balance generated. Don’t know why ?
    =>I guess.. The "Final Process Date" set as 31-Oct-2012 when you end this employee, isn't it?
    Actual Termination Date will let person end at this date, that's mean person record's effective_end_date will equal to the Actual Termination Date and create a new person record after Actual Termination Date.
    Last Standard Process Date let all elements ended as this date.
    Final Process Date means you can process payroll run before this date, and the assignment record's effective_end_date will equal to Final Process Date. That's why your payroll run includes this person. There's no elements because all elements ended on 17-Oct-2012, system doesn't get any element on 31-Oct-2012.
    Best Regards,
    Changhua

  • Need help in Payroll Tax Balance Issue - Urgent

    Hi,
    Please help me with the following Tax and Balance issue. The system is on 12.0.3, South African Legislation.
    Issue : Salary has been restructured from Basic Salary to Total package structure in Dec 2008. Retro Pay was used to pay the difference amounts in Dec Run. But while configuring the new Elements for this Total Package they have missed out adding the Retro Elements to Proper Tax calculating Balances.
    Eg : "TP Salary" element is fed to "Taxable Income RFI" balance but "TP Retro Salary" element is not fed to this balance.
    So tax has not been calculated for those Retro amounts. This has been identified while validating test run for IRP5 tax certificates.
    The Feb 09 (Feb is the Tax year End for payroll) Payroll was already run on 10th and payments were already done. Now we need to tax the retro amounts and retrieve the balance tax amounts from Employees.
    I added the proper tax balances to those Retro elements and and the balances were adjusted to add the Retro amounts. Then I ran the Feb run the payroll again as of 20th, it did not recalculate the tax.
    How to recalculate the tax so that correct tax reflects in the Tax certificates? Please help me with the necessary Info.
    Thanks,
    Sri.

    Hi,
    As I mentioned earlier, I added the appropriate balances which are used to calculate Tax to Retro Elements and those Balances got updated with the delta amount but Tax was not updated. I want to know is there any process provided by Oracle using which Tax for those already paid amounts can be recalculated.
    I calculated the Tax manually and using Adjust Balance form added ZA_TAX_BALANCE_ADJUSTMENT Element and given the difference tax amount in PAYE and Tax Input values and saved the form. The Tax got updated.
    Tax_ASG_RUN - 15000
    Tax_ASG_TAX_YTD - 153257.32 (Prev - 138257.32). When I run the IRP5 (Tax Certificate Process) the tax is also getting correctly on it.
    But client wants Oracle to calculate the Tax for those retro amounts so thats the challenge.
    Could you help me with this.
    Thanks,
    Sri

  • Ireland Payroll - Issue in Tax Refund for Leavers

    Hello Payroll Experts,
    Greetings!
    We are having problems for 2 of our Ireland Based Employees.
    The Below is the step wise details of the issue:
    => Employee has left the Organisation in the month of 21st October'08.
    => The Seperation Action for the employee only has been made only after
    the completion of October Month's Payroll, hence the employee has been
    paid until 31st October '08.
    => While running the November Month Payroll, this employee has been
    picked by the payroll again & the system is calculating the Retro and
    have given the wrongly calculated days back (21st Oct - 31st Oct'08).
    => Even the Pension refund has been given.
    => But the TAX is not getting RECALCULATED (Tax Refund).
    Could you please help us to find out why this issue is happening.
    Thank you in Advance
    Best Regards
    Vijay

    Hi,
    I am facing a problem in professional tax. some employees transferred from non-tax area to tax area, for them the tax is not deducting. where to check?
    Please help me.
    Chandra
    Hi Chandra,
    Please check the following tables:
    V_7IN0P_PTX
    v_t7inp1
    v_t7inp3
    v_t7inp4
    Important : Also check whether when the employee is moving from non ptax region to ptax region then the prorated amount of the ptax region is soming under ptax limit or the amount is under nil limit.
    Along with the above also check, IT0588 subtype 0003 for PTax.
    Regards,
    ARNAV...
    Edited by: ARNAV... on Mar 6, 2010 8:11 AM

Maybe you are looking for