UK Payroll :Pension issue

Hi Experts,
This is related to Additional Voluntary contributions.When an employee is on whole month unpaid leave and there is an entry in InfoType 71,Additional Voluntary Contributions,Flat rate,this is calculated and shown on the payslip although the emp doesnt have sufficient amount (as he is on unapid leave whole month).
We tried putting the wage type in the arrears table(V_T51P6)So that it will not deduct that amount for the month he is on unpaid leave but still its deducting.
Any help on this would be appreciated with higher points?
Thanks in Advance,
Dharani

Hello
Please refer to the SPRO node of the IMG,where you need to maintain the entries for the pension scheme implementation.
Payroll>payroll great britain>Pension Schemes.
Here you need to maintain all required customising for the pension schemes.
Band numbers are used in the calculation of Percentage and Mixed-rate Pension Scheme contributions
Pension Band Level.
The band levels divide the pensionable pay into bands. The band levels can be set at the figures of your own choice.
The band levels are used in the case of Percentage Pension Schemes to calculate the percentage contribution amounts from each band.
With a Mixed-Rate Pension Scheme either a flat-rate or a percentage contribution will be calculated from each band of the employee's salary.
Regards

Similar Messages

Pension issue Mid Month Leaving

Dear All,
As per rule sustem should deduct mid month joining/leaving/absences or transfer scenarios, the Pension/PF Basis will be correspondingly prorated. But our system is not doing this. In RT table i have found 3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00.
Employee leaving date is 14.04.2010. system is picking pension amout as 541. Last year it was coming right.
Please suggest.
Ashwani

Dear Jayanti,
We required prorata basis pension in case of left employees and system is not doing this. This is the issue. As per our PF experts Pension amount should come on prorata basis for left employees in case they left mid of month.System is doing prorata basis last year but from this year it is deducting 541. I am giving two RT cases of different years.
RT table for year 2010. DOL 26.04.2010
/111 EPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/139 VPF Basis              01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     01/2010                    0.00             509.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00           1,050.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 01/2010                    0.00          12,600.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 01/2010                    0.00              96.25
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3F4 Er Pension contributio 01/2010                    0.00             541.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 01/2010                    0.00           6,500.00
/3R3 Metro HRA Basis Amount 01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
1BAS Basic Salary           01/2010                    0.00           8,750.00
RT table for year 2009. DOL 27.10.2009
                                                                                /111 EPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/139 VPF Basis              07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
/3F1 Ee PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F3 Er PF contribution     07/2009                    0.00             628.00
/3F5 Ee Mon PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           1,082.00
/3F6 Ee Ann PF contribution 07/2009                    0.00           8,822.00
/3F9 PF adm chrgs * 1,00,00 07/2009                    0.00              99.18
/3FA PF basis for Ee contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FB PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FC Pension Basis for Er c 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3FJ VPF basis for Ee contr 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.00
/3FL PF Basis for Er Contri 07/2009                    0.00           5,452.00
/3R4 Non-metro HRA Basis Am 07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
1BAS Basic Salary           07/2009                    0.00           9,016.13
Now please suggest what to do. where is the problem ? If have also checked EXIT_HINCALC0_002 but nothing written in it.
With Regards
Ashwani

UK Payroll : Pension Fund Implementation

Dear Techies,
I am new in UK Payroll, Can you please guide me what are all the details we need from the core user as a part of configuration of Pension Fund.
As I know we need Pension Calculation Scheme & Pension Calrulation Rule to do the same, If anything else require apart from this kindly help me out.
What is Band No & Band Level , is it we need from user to maintain in IMG or this is sap standard.
Regards
M Swadhin
Edited by: M Swadhin on Jul 11, 2010 1:15 PM

Hello
Please refer to the SPRO node of the IMG,where you need to maintain the entries for the pension scheme implementation.
Payroll>payroll great britain>Pension Schemes.
Here you need to maintain all required customising for the pension schemes.
Band numbers are used in the calculation of Percentage and Mixed-rate Pension Scheme contributions
Pension Band Level.
The band levels divide the pensionable pay into bands. The band levels can be set at the figures of your own choice.
The band levels are used in the case of Percentage Pension Schemes to calculate the percentage contribution amounts from each band.
With a Mixed-Rate Pension Scheme either a flat-rate or a percentage contribution will be calculated from each band of the employee's salary.
Regards

Pension issue

Hi,
In Payroll GB, where we can set the limit for pension contribution? Any idea?
Sukhram

Hi Sukhram,
You can set this limit in table v_t511k under the field pccap, which is capacity of pension contribution.
Regards
Roop

UK Payroll PU12 Issues

Hello Friends: I have issues in UK Payroll PU12. Wage types in SAP are not going to Ceridian file. Mostly happening with IT0014 wagetypes. I noticed that if I generate the File layout in PU12 then the wage types are going to Ceridian file. However, not advisable to generate the FileLayout without Code changes in PU12. Is there anyway I can resolve this. Any help is greatly appreciated.

Hi - just had a new iphone4 delivered. I have also been waiting for about 3 hours now for activation. From what i have researched it can take anywhere between 1 and 48 hours to activate (seems a bit extreme in this instant modern world!)
If you are upgrading form an iphone 3G or 3Gs (like me) - apparently the simm activation is automatic after you have connected and synced from your itunes. So you shouldn't need to do anything.
There is a page on the o2 website that allows you to manually transfer to the new mini simm: http://swapmysim.o2.co.uk/simswap/swap/validatempn
But even this does not speed up the process, it can still take a while... I'll let you know how long it it eventually took.

GB Payroll - Pension display in Payslip

Hi every one at SDN family
i have issue on pension contribution display in payslip -
i have configure the pension type and maintaied IT 0071 info type - but in payslip the contribution is not showing
what might be the problem.. Please help me on this
Thanks in advans
Regards
KSS

Did you check the specification of the Evaluation Class 02 for the wagetype under concern (used for pension type) in table V_512W_D? This controls the printing on the rem statement.

Payroll retro issue - related to /563

Hi PY experts,
Problem:
I have one PY retro issue.
Issue reported in December is :- One employee has a /563 claim of $18.45 (Claim from prev mth).
Why is here a deduction shown for this payslip?.
Issue reported in Jan 2010 is :- same employee has $99.3 (Claim from prev mth).
My analysis and details are as follows:-
December retro triggered for Oct,Nov.
Jan 10-retro triggered for June 09 onwards.
/561(amt employee owes to employer) in Nov in December run:- 18.45.
/561 in Nov in Jan'10 run:-117.75
So,
/563(claims from previous month) in December in december run:-18.45
/563 in December in Jan'10 run:-117.75
So,
99.30 SGD shown in Jan 2010 is the difference between the figures which was displayed in the last month.Ies (117.75 - 18.45 ) =99.30 .
-But my understanding is /561 will get formulated only in case the /110+/550 is negative.
But in this employee's scenario this amount is not coming as negative.Then how /561 is getting formulated even though( /110+/550 ) is not negative?
There is only difference between different runs of payroll of /101 . here is no difference in /110 amounts for same months in different runs.
So retro triggered thru the payment wage types(Cumilation 01).So I have run the wage type reoprt for comparing these wage types.(I can fwd this to email)
My doubts /help required areas are :-
1) How /561 is getting formulated even though( /110+/550 ) is not negative?
2) I can forward the details in proper excel format(easy to compare kind) -monthly wage type comparison report
which is related to (/101) wise reoprt , pls help me to find out how the exact amount is getting formulated.
Regards
Thomas
Edited by: tomspadiyara on Jan 10, 2010 7:00 AM
Edited by: tomspadiyara on Jan 11, 2010 3:19 AM

Hi,
I got the answers for the questions..
Can anybody pls help me by a document how all the technical wage types are getting formulated: ies
/140
/254 etc etc kind
This will help me for a faster derivation of the figure came in /563

PU12 Transaction: Mutilple Payroll Area Issue

Dear All,
I am going under very strange issue with PU12 transaction. This transaction runs fine and export payroll data if a person is hired only in one Payroll Area.
Like, if a employee E123456 is hired under Payroll Area - 99 and if this is still under that payroll area in HR-Infotype 1 THEN PU12 will work fine.
If employee is transferred to some other payroll area - 01. So this time Infotype 1 will have two record - Initial Hired Payroll 99 (delimited) record and current Payroll Area 01 record.
When PU12 transaction starts for this employee it only will run for Initial Payroll Area (in this case 99). Whatever the data under Payroll Area 99 time span will only get processed.
Whatever the data will come under new Payroll Area 01, it will not get processes.
Is there something missing in configuration side or something to be added explicitly?
Thanks,
Roshan
Edited by: Roshan Gupta on Feb 9, 2011 1:39 PM

Hi Mahesh,
Thanks for the reply. But the link gives good information about configuration of PU12. The scenario I have raised, it doesn't help to understand that. But its good reference guide and I already had that. Can you please help me to understand what could be the reason of the mentioned problem.
Thanks,
Roshan

Payroll Period Issue

Dear Gurus,
                    In Payrol Control Record
If i put Payroll Period 12 2009 01.03.2010 - 31.03.2010
& Earliest retro acctg period       12 2009 01.04.2009
Save then if i change Payroll Status Release Mode then
Payroll period               01 1976 01.01.1976 - 30.04.1976 is coming which is wrong.
Please Advised why is coming wrong
Regards
MHPO

Patil
Check the Period parameter and date modifier
and check the assigment of the above said parameters with the pay roll area in table V_T549A
later generate the Pay roll periods and check
there might be some in consistency while generateing the pay roll periods

Payroll initialization issue

Dear all
i got a error when i am running payroll.
error text is
This is a live client
No check performed against control record
payroll cancelled
Scenario is like this:
simulation is working fine, no modification in control records, only usual release no such error in past.
And this is a critical period as i have to run now.
Thx

Hi
Did you done something in Schema?
Check the program Hincalc0.
Check where is the error text and what is a problem.
Reply if any hints or problem .
<b>Reminder : Points should be given on answers.</b>

Adhoc query - Total payroll day issue on infotype 2001

Dear Expert,
I am working on the adhoc query and would like to generate the total number of payroll days taken by a particular employee.
E.g. Employee A has 4 leave record in Nov 2011
14-Nov, 16, Nov, 23 Nov, 25 Nov
When I select the reporting period between 1-Nov-2011 to 30-Nov-2011, the total payroll days generated by the adhoc query is only 1. I am not sure why. Please help
Best Regards,
WF

Hi,
Might be remaining days are Non working days/Weekly offs/ Holidays falls..
You Better Check through PA30 Overview of Absence records, Whether the Days are deducted from Quota or not.
Need to check absence class in V_554s_0

Benefits Rates ( IT0167/IT0168) not feeding through PU12.

Hi experts,
I know this question was asked before but no reply so far from
any one.
My issue is We are currently running PU12 export and using ZTMU
(copy of standard OTMU interface format).I am interested in
knowing how companies handle the issue of benefits when rates
increase. The benefit fields in IT0167 and IT0168 are
calculated fields based on various parameters, i.e.. BSAL and
rates of coverage and calculations for premiums. They
dynamically will update in IT0167 and IT0168 if there is a rate
increase, but PU12 does not recognize this as a change and it
does not get picked up. I believe this is because the info type
itself does not change, no date change -- only the calculated
field. Can any one give me some information on how this should
be addressed in the export? This is a payroll impacting issue.
If someone has any resolution please so send it to me at
[email protected]
Any reply's or any clues in resolving this issue are much
appreciated.
Thank you,
Madhu

SAP HR Support Gurus ,,,,,Help Reqd

Hello Gurus,
Im Pradeep, SAP Certified now getting into SAP HR Support team as a team member.
*So anySupport Guru out thr,can u pls let me knw wat r the general queries handled or solved by a SAP HR Support Consultant n wat r those queries which i hav concentrate more on.
If u can give ur contact details with the suggestion it wl b appreciated, so tat i can contact you for more details.
Thanks in Advance
Pradeep

Hi Pradeep,
I think you might have got the scenario regarding the support project.Hence I want to give some inputs.
Support itself gives the meanning what our role is ..! And we , being a support consultant have to solve the issues that has been arised to end users or to the business.
It all depends on the end users ( if they are been trained well then issues will be less) and the implementation consultant( if he had implemented with utmost care and with proper documentation).
Most of the issues will be from end users who dont know how to import or how to enter data.And if they see any error message also, they will raise a ticket (issues tracker).
Also some times we will get payroll related issues where we have to act very fast and resolve the issue cause it will impact the payroll.
And on a daily basis , issues may be on OM as they can be related to structural authorizations or any data related problem..
So i can say , it all depends on Client and the end user and also based on the Business.
Do let me know if you are not satisfied or still have any queries .
Regards,
Sri
Reward if satisfied.......

Pension payment period record issue in Retiree Payroll

Dear Experts,
We are implementing Retiree payroll with new set of wagetypes and payroll area. Now requirement is that there needs to be a provision of recording the balance period of pension payment and further it should be displayed in the form of report. That means say employee has the eligibility of receiving pension from 01.12.1998 to 14.11.2015 and he has received it till Oct, 2010, remaining balance period needs to be projected in month and days like 60.14/98.12 etc.
Now please suggest how to achieve it, should we create a custom infotype for storing it or any other way is there.
Thanks and regards
Tan

It is Indian payroll.
Requirement is to store the balance period of pension payment, like if one employee is eligible to get pension ( as per our pension benefit scheme) for 10 years 3months 15 days since his retirement date and has already received for 36 months i.e. 3years, we need to store and display that he is eligible to get pension for another 7years 3months 15 days in 87.15 format (i.e. 7*12+3= 87months and 15days) on monthly basis.
This will be also captured in a report later on.
Please suggest
Regards
Tan

Ireland Payroll - Issue in Tax Refund for Leavers

Hello Payroll Experts,
Greetings!
We are having problems for 2 of our Ireland Based Employees.
The Below is the step wise details of the issue:
=> Employee has left the Organisation in the month of 21st October'08.
=> The Seperation Action for the employee only has been made only after
the completion of October Month's Payroll, hence the employee has been
paid until 31st October '08.
=> While running the November Month Payroll, this employee has been
picked by the payroll again & the system is calculating the Retro and
have given the wrongly calculated days back (21st Oct - 31st Oct'08).
=> Even the Pension refund has been given.
=> But the TAX is not getting RECALCULATED (Tax Refund).
Could you please help us to find out why this issue is happening.
Thank you in Advance
Best Regards
Vijay

Hi,
I am facing a problem in professional tax. some employees transferred from non-tax area to tax area, for them the tax is not deducting. where to check?
Please help me.
Chandra
Hi Chandra,
Please check the following tables:
V_7IN0P_PTX
v_t7inp1
v_t7inp3
v_t7inp4
Important : Also check whether when the employee is moving from non ptax region to ptax region then the prorated amount of the ptax region is soming under ptax limit or the amount is under nil limit.
Along with the above also check, IT0588 subtype 0003 for PTax.
Regards,
ARNAV...
Edited by: ARNAV... on Mar 6, 2010 8:11 AM

UK Payroll :Pension issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for