Unity Connection 8.6 Mailbox Store Issue

Hi,
I am seeing an alert in Unity Connection Mailbox Stores that" This mailbox store is at or over 90% of its capacity ".
Also i have set the Aging Policies, but still no results. Anyways to reduce the size by deleting any other unwanted files.
Pls suggest.

Hello Jagadish,
In regards to this warning message you can also reference:
https://supportforums.cisco.com/thread/2241790
If your aging policy is "not working" it may be due to the fact it is not working retroactive, meaning that it is not purging old messages.
For best practices it would be best to create another Mailbox Store rather than increasing the size of the current one due to the fact that backups might fail due to the size.
Best regards,
David Rojas Peck.

Similar Messages

Unity Connection 8.5 mailbox quotas

I configured mailbox quotas for user mailbox
Send/receive quota is 3 Mgb
Send Quota is 2 Mgb
Warning Quota is 1 Mgb
User mailbox is already 3.5 Mgb
HOwever, when i call this user from internal or external number - i still can leave a mesage for this user ( i expected system DOES NOT ALLOW to leave any new mesage for this user because his voicemail box is already exceeds Send/receive quota which is 3 Mgb )
Checkbox for option "Full Mailbox Check for Outside Caller Messages"is already checked in
What is wrong in this config ?

Here is how send/receive quotas impact things:
Quota Handling for Outside Caller Messages
By default, if an outside caller attempts to send a message to a user whose send/receive quota has been exceeded, Cisco Unity Connection allows the caller to record a message for the recipient. This can be changed by checking the Full Mailbox Check for Outside Caller Messages check box on the System Settings > Advanced > Conversation page.
If the recipient mailbox has not yet exceeded the send/receive quota at the time an outside caller records a message, but the quota is exceeded in the act of delivering the message, Connection delivers the message regardless of the quota or the setting of the Full Mailbox Check for Outside Caller Messages check box.
Quota Handling for User-to-User Messages
If a user whose voice mailbox has exceeded the send quota signs in to Connection and attempts to send a message to another user, Connection indicates that the send quota has been exceeded, and does not allow the sender to record the message. If the user calls another user and is forwarded to a voice mailbox, the user is able to leave a message, but the message is sent as an outside caller message.
If a user attempts to send a message to another user whose mailbox has exceeded the send/receive quota, or if the quota is exceeded in the act of delivering the message, Connection sends a nondelivery receipt to the message sender.
Connection delivers read receipts and nondelivery receipts to users regardless of whether their quotas have been exceeded.
HTH,
Chris

Unity Connection 8.5.1 MWI issue with French Locale

Hi There,
I am experiencing issues with MWI while using french locale on CUC 8.5.1. While, it works perfectly fine with English (US).
CUCM version is 8.0.3. Any ideas will be much appreciated.
Regards,
Sami

Hi Armin,
You could be seeing this behavior due to this bug;
Incorrect locale version cause VM outage
CSCtq97240
Symptom:
Unity connection 8.5.1 installed with locales may experience the following issues
1.When users try to leave message ,they get the fail safe message
2.Sometimes they are able to leave message , message doesnt get delivered and no MWI
Conditions:
When Locale version ES 24 is installed on UC 8.5(1) [ ES 16] or less
Workaround:
please downgrade the locale version to ES 16 if you have 8.5(1)SU1 or use US English language.
Though the Release notes of 8.5(1)
http://www.cisco.com/web/software/282074314/49311/851su1cucrm.pdf
clearly mentions about the compatibility , Many customers think its good for them to install the latest locale ES and hence end with this condition.
This is the compatibility matrix for locales
========================================
a) No locales are available for Connection 8.5(1) base version only.
b) Locale SU1 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)SU1.
c) Locale ES 24 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)ES 17 to ES 36 only.
d) Locale ES 24 is not tested for Connection 8.5(1)ES 37 to ES46.
e) Locale 8.5(1)SU2 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)SU2 only. Not all locales available as of now
f) Locale 8.5(1)SU3 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)SU3 only. Only Japanese is available as of now.
g) Locale 8.5(1)ES72 is supported with Connection 8.5(1)ES72 only. Only Brazilian-Portuguese is available as of now.
Cheers!
Rob
"Your life is worth much more than gold."
- Bob Marley

Unity Connections 8.5 - Mailbox Access Rights

Hello,
Is it possible in Unity Connections 8.5 to have a mailbox setup where anyone who has the ID and PIN can access and listen to the messages but cannot delete the voicemail messages. There would be only 1-2 to users have the capability to delete the messages. I have a request to setup an attendance dial in mailbox where it can be checked by multiple users but only a select few would have the ability to delete the messages.
Thank You

Hi Troy,
My friend Tony is most correct here (+5 ) The best you can
do is trick most of the users into thinking "delete" is not available.
These settings are only exposed when using the Custom Keymapping Tool
in CUC, so you won't see them on your default conversation. Let's say
you are using the Classic Conversation for your users. You can go to the
Custom Keymapping Tool from cucadmin and say select Custom Keymapping #3
when it comes up you would, first off, reset the mapping on all tabs to Classic Conversation
this would then replicate your existing setup. Then go to the After Message menu page and map
some key # to "message delete" I used 17 in my tests here. Then you would also uncheck the
"option is voiced in menu" checkbox so the users that you apply this keymapping to would not
be offered the delete message option.
The next step is to assign the new Custom Keymapping #3 conversation to the
required Mailbox via user>xxxx>Phone menu>Conversation>Custom Keymapping #3
and apply.
You would also set Phone menu>Conversation>Custom Keymapping #3 in the User template
area so special "restricted" mailboxes that are created can use this conversation as well
In my tests here the only thing different than this example is that we use the Optional Conversation 1
so I reset the mapping on all tabs to Optional Conversation 1 when going through the steps above.
This worked like a charm.
Cheers!
Rob
"Seek it out and ye shall find "
- OneRepublic

How can i solve "Cannot connect to the iTune Store" issue on my iPhone?

Hi,
Frequently i'm getting alert message (Cannot Connect to the iTune Store) while use my valid Credential on iPhone 4 (even Itunes application) Setting-> iTunes & App Stores->. but same credential accepted other iPhones too why not in my iPhone 4. same way others Apple ID wouldn't accept in my iPhone 4. how can i solve this problem? please suggest me.
Thanks in Advance,
Suresh Balakrishnan.

Take a look at these instructions:
http://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/how-to-make-ringtones-for-iphone/

Unity Connections remote call sign-in issue.

I have some users that when they dial there DID from outside they hit there VM press star and are prompted for their sign-in number and pin. Then I have some users that do the same thing, but the greeting just continues to play. I am sure there is a simple fix to this, but I cannot seem to find it. Hoping someone out here can lead me in the correct direction.
I am running Unity Connection 8.6.2.
Thanks in advance,
Dave

Hi Dave,
I would check the following on a "working" vs "non-working" user;
User> Edit> Caller Input> * (star)> send to Sign-in
Cheers!
Rob
Please support CSC helps Kiva
https://supportforums.cisco.com/blog/12122171/cisco-support-community-helps-kiva

Cisco Unity Connection Default "Operator" Mailbox

This mailbox gets full as expected pretty fast so I clean that up occassionally or setup message aging policy.
But I want to know if I go under Greetings and enable"Hang up" option after the Greeting is played for standard as well as closed greeting will that work.It doesn't seem to be working for me. Messages are still coming through.
Please Advise
DM

That will work for calls that hit the mailbox directly. It's also possible that there is a call handler with the Operator mailbox set as the message recipient. Check under the call handlers Edit > Message Settings menu.
Also, if memory serves, the operator mailbox is a member of the Undeliverable Messages distribution list. This DL should only receive messages if you have something misconfigured within the system (e.g. you didn't adjust the Opening Greeting after greeting action). It should always have at least one member so the messages can be recognized and routed to their appropriate destination until you fix it.
Please remember to rate helpful responses and identify helpful or correct answers.

Cisco Unity Connection 8.5 PIMG integration.

Hello Experts
My customer has PIMG integration with Cisco Unity Connection, users can access their mailboxes after creating a direct routing rule with the search scope where this users are located to send the call to "attemp sing in" conversation this part is working fine. Now subscribers do not get the user's mailbox when reaching FNA,Busy or RNA they are going to the "welcome to Cisco Unity Connection Messaging System from a... default greeting. Using Remote port status monitor I can not see the call coming in,but I am sure the call is getting to that server. I will like to know what traces I can enable to get the extension that is being sent by PIMG or what else I can check on the Unity connection server to resolve this issue?
Thanks in advance

Hi Rob
I configured the Direct Routing to send the calls to conversation "sing in" because the customer has multiple integrations and duplicated users with same extesion, he was getting "invalid username and password" everytime they try to log in, meaning that the user was in different CSS and the existing Direct Routing Rule did not have this CSS in the Search Scope.Maybe in you case you the users were not sorted out by CSS.
I am pritty sure they are using Nortel phones,but not sure what exact version.
Thank you for your response.I will try to configure a Forward Routing rule to send the calls to and specific user'extension base on the calling number to see what happens.

Unity connection - how to verify if an email of the voicemail is being sent out

Hi Guys
I am running unity connection 8.5 and I am integrated with exchange 2010. Single inbox seems to be working fine for all users except one. The users info in unity connection looks fine and is pulling down from AD using the LDAP integration just fine. He seems to get voicemail in email about half the time.
I would like to verify if I could what is leaving the Unity connection server to show the issue is related to the users pc setting or the exchange server.
Any way I can use a tool to verify that when a voicemail is left Unity connection sends the message to the exchange server?
thanks
Bill

Hi Bill,
There's no easy way other than looking at traces, really. I'd check to see if the client machine is using Outlook in cached mode, or if they're doing any type of scheduled archiving, or sending voicemails via rules to a local .PST, etc.
Hope that helps,
Brad

Moved users to new message store Unity Connection

We recently moved users to a new messwage store on exchange. These users can no longer receive their voice mail in outlook. Everyone else can. What is the issue here?
Unity Connection
8.5.1.10000-206
Exchange 2003

You may need to check the Unified Messaging profile setup in Unity to ensure it still has access into the new store. In 2003, it uses WebDav, so if the account you are using is not setup to use WebDav on the new store, Unity can not deliver nor retrive information from this new store. Also note, there is some sort of odd requirement with Microsoft and WebDav.. the account that uses WebDav must have a mailbox setup and at least one message sent and received to it. (Or just logged into at least once for it to be active). I have no idea why, but its documented at MS and seemed to fix a problem for me during a prior install with CUC and 2003 Exchange

Unity Connection 8.6.2 report error and issues

Hello,
I found some other hits on this error and tried the workarounds (restarting tomcat, and report data harvester) but am still getting "Unable to find any report data based on parameter(s)" for a certain timeframe on multiple reports when I know activity occurred in that timeframe.
User Phone login report, Outcall Billing Detail Report, others.
CUC version is 8.6.2.20000-2
Problem is during this timeframe someone dialed into system and changed the transfer extensions to various LD numbers throughout an entire day and the reports aren't showing these outcalls. Call Manager CDR data show the calls being placed from Unity VM ports and the Unity Conversation Manager traces I grabbed for the timeframe show the calls to those numbers to. I'm just trying to match up with a report and figure out if there is some other log or trace file I can look to determine for sure the caller logged in to the voicemail box and changed the transfer extension on it. (guessed the voicemaill password). The failed log in report doesn't even show the failed login attempt in output from traces below. The transfer extension dest addr was different on the transfers on this same mailbox. Have locked down the system since but want to get better grip on this with the reports and traces.
I looked over the CUC 8.6.2 SU1 and SU2 release notes and not seeing any resolved bugs for these matters either.
Here are some samples lines from Conversation Manager traces:
00:32:46.399 HDR|02/04/2013 ,Significant
00:32:46.399 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9
00:33:55.006 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:33:58.955 |9744,PhoneSystem-1-001,E68CA6DB3CAE4118BE9F9612BD3540A9,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:34:37.090 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDL,11,CCsCdlImsAccess::AuthenticateSubscriber: Cannot authenticate user: JOESMITH IMS Result Code: 1 on line 108 of file CdlIms/src/CsCdlImsAccess.cpp: Error: 0x80046505 Description: E_CDL_SP_EXEC_FAILURE
00:34:50.403 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,CDE,3,Authentication Failed for Subscriber 555123 (Src/CsCallSubscriber.cpp 2969)
00:34:50.404 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,-1,-1,An invalid password entered when trying to log into a user mailbox. Details - [].
00:36:29.331 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:36:33.484 |9832,PhoneSystem-1-001,9DB394E443A3419FA0020BC9D1A92806,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
00:44:53.444 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='' callerName='' calledID='555123' redirectingID='555123' lastRedirectingID='555123' reason=4=FwdNoAnswer lastReason=8=FwdUncond] port=PhoneSystem-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=23 callGuid=FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6
00:45:20.019 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Enter CAvMiuCall::TransferEx destAddr='715551231234' type=2=Release maxRings=4 mediaSwitch='00a499fa-a193-45b0-a153-564a64019eb8'
00:45:24.121 |9743,PhoneSystem-1-001,FEB6975B82284F37A161CD66ECBA61C6,MiuGeneral,25,Exit CAvMiuCall::TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK
Thanks

Hello ebergquist,
As advised we could try to run a report before an upgrade was performed to verify if it will pull the information, which in the event it does we would be matching the bug, therefore access the CUC CLI and type the following command: file get install *
You will be required to have an SFTP available for the file transfer and port 22 open on the sftp client.
Once you receive the files you would need to check system-history.log, below is an example.
=======================================
Product Name -    Cisco Unity Connection
Product Version - 8.5.1.12900-7
Kernel Image -    2.6.9-89.0.20.EL
=======================================
02/24/2013 13:35:02 | root: Boot 8.5.1.12900-7 Start
02/24/2013 16:03:45 | root: Install 8.5.1.12900-7 Success
Once you check the time stamp and date of the upgrade try to gather a report for a time range before the upgrade was performed, even though they might be overwritten, there still could be a possibility that it succeeds.
If this bug is not the issue then you might want to take into consideration:
1. Make sure that the service ReportDB is [STARTED] in the output of the command: utils service list.
2. If you have Digital Networking on your server make sure there is no stalled replication. Go to RTMT (Real Time Monitoring Tool)> Syslogs> Select on the dropdown your server> Doble click on Application logs> CiscoSyslog. You can then do a manual search or sort with the filter option:
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Hit apply. Below is an example:
Date: Feb 19 08:01:15
Machine Name: LAB1111
Severity: Error
App ID: CuReplicator
Message: : 1151681: LAB1111.corpnet2.com: Feb 19 2013 08:01:11.662 UTC : UC_UCEVNT-3-EvtReplicatorStalledReceiveReplication %[ClusterID=][NodeID=LAB1111]: Detected stalled replication receiving from location LAB1111. Waiting for missing USN 2222. This situation may indicate network connectivity problems.
3.Make sure that replication is working properly in the cluster. You can check them via the following commands: showcuc cluster status    and   utils dbreplcation runtimestate
For the TransferEx that you state changed to ceros -> TransferEx=0x00000000=S_OK , this is just a hexadecimal value that is returned stating that the transfer that took place during the call was successful, in this case the actual transfer was to the following destination -> TransferEx destAddr='715551231234', and was during a call to ->calledID='555123' , this does not have to do with the actual change of a transfer number performed by a user.
Those traces won't be enough you will have to additionally set: ConvSub, level 3   and CDE, level 16 so that you may see output in the traces as the example posted in the previous thread.
Traces would be the path to follow in order to verify the user that changed the transfer rule, as this is as i understand the goal your pursuing.
However if it is of any help, another way to get on hold of the numbers that were updated on the Transfer Rule is to use the User Data Dump tool, this information reflects changes regardless of whether it was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface) or GUI (Graphic User Interface). For more information on the tool go to:
http://ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/UserDataDump/Help/UserDataDump.htm
Traces are extensive to be reviewed if done manually, however you can do a text search with a tool as Notepad ++ to look for keywords as "NewTransferNumber =" or "CDE,16,Transfer allowed", once you find this you check the call GUIDwhich is the reference number of the call and that exists during the entire length of the call, whether it is while a person is leaving a voicemail or the user is accessing his/her's inbox. This would speed up your search.
So as explained in the first thread you would then do another text search returning all possible matches with that callGUID.
Now if you get to the very beginning of the call you would see something like:
Line 13712: 18:58:05.156 |24720,CCIE-1-001,0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4,Arbiter,-1,Incoming Call [callerID='2199' callerName='' calledID='6789' redirectingID='' lastRedirectingID='' reason=1=DirectlastReason=1024=Unknown] port=CCIE-1-001 portsInUse=1 ansPortsFree=1callGuid=0C9C97BDF5F444F0B535D231C32DDCB4
In this example you see my test user callerID='2199' calling the Pilot number 6789 which is the voicemail button
calledID='6789, and the what type of call is it whether Forward or Direct, when logging to voicemail you are going to see Direct which is going to match the Direct Routing Rules and send the call to the attempt sign in conversation.
The other approach is a rule out method between the Audit traces and the User Data Dump tool.
So let's say you have a baseline document that states all of the Transfer numbers for all users.
If the User Data Dump reflects a different number and the Audit logs do not show any change, starting from the time the baseline was created and the point of time where the number was changed, then you could deduce the change was done via TUI (Telephone User Interface). Unfortunately you wouldn't be able to tell who did the change in this case.
Nevertheless, remember that a user may have for example an Alternate Extension so the change might not necessarily be done from the office phone: "Alternate extensions can make calling Cisco Unity Connection from an alternate device—such as a mobile phone, a home phone, or a phone at another work site—more convenient. When you specify the phone number for an alternative extension, Connection handles all calls from that number in the same way that it handles calls from a primary extension (assuming that ANI or caller ID is passed along to Connection from the phone system). This means that Connection associates the alternate phone number with the user account, and when a call comes from that number, Connection prompts the user to enter a PIN and sign in."
Best regards,
David Rojas
Cisco TAC Support Engineer, Unity
Email: [email protected]
Phone: 1-407- 241-2965 ext 6406
Mon, Wed, and Fri 12:00 pm to 9:00 pm ET, Tue and Thu 8:00 am to 5:00pm ET
Cisco Worldwide Contact link is below for further reference.
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/support/tsd_cisco_worldwide_contacts.html

Unity Connection 7.x - Best Practice for Large Report Mailboxes?

Good morning, We have 150 mailboxes from Nurses to give shift reports in. The mailbox quota is 60MB and the message aging policy is on. Deletede messages are deletede after 14 days. The massage aging policy is system wide, and increasing the quota would cause storage issues. Is there a way to keep the message aging policy and reduce it for 1 group of users? Is there a way to bulk admin the mailbox quota changes?
Version 7.1.3ES9.21004-9
Thanks

As for UC 8x, you're not alone. I don't typically recommend going to an 8.0 release (no offense to Cisco). Let things get vetted a bit and then start looking for the recommended stable version to migrate to.
As for bulk changes to mailbox store configurations for users, Jeff (Lindborg) may be able to correct me if I am wrong here. But with the given tools, I don't think there is a way to bulk edit or update the mailbox info for users (i.e., turn on/off Message Aging Policy). No access to those values via Bulk Edit and no associated fields in the BAT format either.
Now, with that said - no one knows better than Lindborg when it comes to Unity. So I defer to him on that point.
Hailey
Please rate helpful posts!

Single Inbox Issue with Unity Connection 8.5 and Exchange 2003

Hello Unity Gurus,
I recently upgraded our Unity server to Unity Conenction 8.5. We are pressing hard to have unified messaging. However theres always problems it seems.
We have several 2003 exchange servers, two of the exchange servers split up our organization and one has half of the users mailboxes and the other server has the remaining half. So far the only way that I can get Unified messaging is if I create two separate Unified Messaging Services one for one half, the other for the other half.
This becomes a problem since now when I create the Unified Message account I have to know what server the user is on and the problem being is that I have 700 voicemail users ill have to look up. Not only that but, if our employees move from one site to the next and if the mailbox gets moved then I imagine most likely break unified messaging for that account.
I've read the install guide for Unity connection Unified Messaging and I understand that the second option is to have Connection to search for Exchange servers via Active Directory however, when I set that up and test it via unified messaging services I get an error " searching network...failed to locate domain controller via DNS. Failed to locate an exchange 2003 server."
DNS seems to work if I create single Unified Messaging Service and use the host name that way.
Anyone have any thoughts or found a work around to this issue?
Thanks,
Dan

We have 41 exchange UM services configured in Unity Connection on 10 clusters, each one to the 2003 exchange servers. This is the only way it will work for us, as e2k3 can not search for and find other exchange services. For 2010, it is able to search by AD domain and site name, and we only have one connector configured on each server to the e2k10 environment. I believe this is the way it works, and is difficult to manage but works. Just my two cents.

Unity Connection Voice Mail Issue

Hi,
I have a weird Unity Connection Voice Mail issue and would appriciate any help i can get. Many thanks in advance.
I have Unity connection 7.0 and CUCM 7.0 integrated in a lab enviroment and here is what happens.
When I place a call internally say from 2001 to 2002, things work as expected, 2002 rings and it goes to voicemail where I can leave voicemail and listen to it from 2002.
However, if I place call from the PSTN to the same number 2002 (or any other number in other sites etc) the call again rings in 2002 and goes to voicemail, unity cnx plays the greetings for 2002 and says record your message as usual. Everything up to point is fine, then when the time on the PSTN phone is showing around 14 seconds into the call unity starts playing, "to send this message press one", if I press one nothing happens.
I have rebuilt unity and cucm, even just configured the bare minimum in the lab and still getting the same result. I tried calling from E1 connection and T1 connection but with the same results.
I have run out of ideas...
===============================
Here is a call trace from an internal call:
CallData, 1, CallerId=2003, CalledId=2002, RedirectingId=2002, Origin=16, Reason=4, CallGuid=8B7859FD6C16417A9A07F507418DD25B, CallerName=, LastRedirectingId=2002, LastRedirectingReason=4, PortDisplayName=PhoneSystem-1-001
Application, 1, 2003, AttemptForward
State, 1, 2003, State - AttemptForward.cde!Dummy
State, 1, 2003, Event is [NULL]
Application, 1, 2003, PHTransfer
State, 1, 2003, State - PHTransfer.cde!LoadInfo
State, 1, 2003, Event is [TrueEvent]
Application, 1, 2003, PHGreeting
State, 1, 2003, State - PHGreeting.cde!PlayGreeting
Display, 1, 2003, Call answered if needed
Display, 1, 2003, Playing greeting for Subscriber: hq2
Display, 1, 2003, No DTMF received
Display, 1, 2003, Playing greeting for Subscriber: hq2
State, 1, 2003, Event is [RecordMsgEvent]
State, 1, 2003, State - PHGreeting.cde!RecordMsg
State, 1, 2003, Event is [NULL]
State, 1, 2003, State - PHGreeting.cde!RunEditMsg
Application, 1, 2003, -->MessageEditing
State, 1, 2003, State - MessageEditing.cde!CheckMsgMenuOpt
State, 1, 2003, Event is [EditMessageMenuEvent]
State, 1, 2003, State - MessageEditing.cde!PlayEditMenu
State, 1, 2003, Event is [HangupEvent]
State, 1, 2003, State - MessageEditing.cde!CheckMsgLength
State, 1, 2003, Event is [ManyEvent]
State, 1, 2003, State - MessageEditing.cde!SendMsg
State, 1, 2003, Event is [TrueEvent]
State, 1, 2003, State - MessageEditing.cde!ConfirmSend
State, 1, 2003, Event is [HangupEvent]
Application, 1, 2003, <--MessageEditing
State, 1, 2003, Event is [HangupEvent]
Display, 1, 2003, Idle
Display, 1, , Dialing (MWI) '2002'
Display, 1, , Idle
and here is a trace from an external (PSTN) call
Trying 142.100.64.13, 5000 ... Open
CallData, 1, CallerId=911, CalledId=2002, RedirectingId=2002, Origin=16, Reason=4, CallGuid=CA3DFD90846C4FE7B0D68298A7698287, CallerName=PSTN Emergency, LastRedirectingId=2002, LastRedirectingReason=4, PortDisplayName=PhoneSystem-1-001
Application, 1, 911, AttemptForward
State, 1, 911, State - AttemptForward.cde!Dummy
State, 1, 911, Event is [NULL]
Application, 1, 911, PHTransfer
State, 1, 911, State - PHTransfer.cde!LoadInfo
State, 1, 911, Event is [TrueEvent]
Application, 1, 911, PHGreeting
State, 1, 911, State - PHGreeting.cde!PlayGreeting
Display, 1, 911, Call answered if needed
Display, 1, 911, Playing greeting for Subscriber: hq2
Display, 1, 911, No DTMF received
Display, 1, 911, Playing greeting for Subscriber: hq2
State, 1, 911, Event is [RecordMsgEvent]
State, 1, 911, State - PHGreeting.cde!RecordMsg
State, 1, 911, Event is [NULL]
State, 1, 911, State - PHGreeting.cde!RunEditMsg
Application, 1, 911, -->MessageEditing
State, 1, 911, State - MessageEditing.cde!CheckMsgMenuOpt
State, 1, 911, Event is [EditMessageMenuEvent]
State, 1, 911, State - MessageEditing.cde!PlayEditMenu
State, 1, 911, Event is [HangupEvent]
State, 1, 911, State - MessageEditing.cde!CheckMsgLength
State, 1, 911, Event is [NULL]
Application, 1, 911, <--MessageEditing
State, 1, 911, Event is [NULL]
State, 1, 911, State - PHGreeting.cde!AfterMsg
State, 1, 911, Event is [NULL]
Display, 1, 911, Idle

Sounds like one way audio from PSTN to your Unity Connection, couple of things to check:
1. ensure your protocols are bound properly on the GW, i.e. SIP/H323/MGCP
2. Make sure IP routing is OK between Unity and the voice gateway
HTH,
Chris

How to delete multiple messages in the same mailbox all at once? Unity Connection

I just was assigned the task of administrating three Unity Connection servers that are networked. The Operator mailboxes on each system have been taking messages since 2010 and have over 5 thousand messages in them (nearly 3 mega bytes). I've corrected the set up so the mailboxes no longer are taking messages, but would like to delete all the new messages in order free up memory resources, and I don't want to undo all the Call Handler relationships in order to delete the mailboxes and then recreate them, etc. I used the PCA tool to clean up the Operator MBX on a standalone Unity Connection that had nearly 1800 messages, but it took nearly 30 minutes for the PCA tool to load and another 4.5 hours to delete one message at a time (major carpal tunnel afterwards!). For these mailboxes with 5-6K messages, the PCA tool was not loaded after 3 hours!   Is there a faster, more efficient tool for deleting all new messages in a single mailbox? (i.e., Message Hunter?)

Hi There,
+5 to heath for his good notes!
One nice way with Unity Connection is with the use of this excellent tool from the great suite of Unity Tools (use the ** reset" feature **).
Unity Connection Bulk User Delete
For resetting users you have the option of emptying the mailbox, resetting greetings, deleting voice names, resetting passwords, removing private lists and a number of other options you may choose.   For installations where the user base “changes over” frequently such as schools this may be a nicer option. This option is also allowed for CoRes installations since it does not involve the removal of user objects from the Connection database.
http://www.ciscounitytools.com/Applications/CxN/BulkUserDelete/BulkUserDelete.html
Cheers!
Rob
Please support CSC helps Kiva
https://supportforums.cisco.com/blog/12122171/cisco-support-community-helps-kiva

Unity Connection 8.6 Mailbox Store Issue

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for