Unreleased PO/SA and their Approval Level

The client need a report on the unreleased PO/SA and their approval level (lowest level only).
In the Structure RM06B, We have two fileds
ANZEF : Final Release
ANZFR : Release to date
The difference between the two fields will give me the unreleased PO/SA.
My question is
1) Does data comes from Structure-Field combination, if not
2) What is the equivalent Table-Field combination and how do I see it.
Thanks and Regards,
Bhavesh

Hi,
Look at the release status of the PO.
Screenfield MEPO_REL_GENERAL-FRGKX (you may find in ME23n for a po that has release strategy and not released yet, in its header -->Release Strategy tab)
Release indicator can tell the status of PO whether released or not
It is however, configured:
T16FE-FRGKE
This table will show you for the picked up release strategy in the PO, how many levels are there and at what level what status it will have...
Hope it helps!
Regards

Similar Messages

In MRP Run for FERT, i want to eliminate 3rd level HALB and their BOM compo

Hi All,
Can you please guide me on this issue please.
Regarding - In MRP Run for FERT, i want to eliminate 3rd level HALB and their BOM components for exploration and planning
My scenario is:
Level 1: FERT1
Level 2: HALB1.1 + ROH1.1 + VERP1.1
Level 3: HALB1.1.1 + ROH1.1.1
Level 4: ROH 1.1.1.1 + ROH1.1.1.2
While performing MRP run i dont want to include the material HALB1.1.1 (Level 3 component) and their corresponding BOM component (ROH 1.1.1.1 + ROH1.1.1.2)
My constraint:
The reason for this is HALB1.1.1 is being manufactured through REM profile with separate PIR and MRP run.
But it is being consumed in FERT1 through intermediate semi-finished HALB1.1. and it needs to include for Product costing.
Note: All materials have been marked as PD - MRP type
Would be a great help from you.
Thanks and Regards
Khadeer Ahmed

Hi,
If you put in FI forums then you will get reply immediatly.
Anil

2 days automatically routed to the next approval level

I would like to know, is there anyone accepted this pre-defined rule setting, the order will automatically route to the next level approval if 2 days limited is passed? I think Oracle should provide the flexibility on choosing such routing rule.

We agree. This should be identical to the current functionality of Oracle's iProcurement.
We also need to have the second approver layer related to category. This means that per category it should be possible to route to two different approvers:
- budget responsible manager
- technical manager
For some products and services this is a must have. For example, when a buyer selects a computer some companies require that also the department responsible for the maintainance of computers in some companies should give their approval for such a purchase.
Kind regards,
Michel de Knoop
KPN Xchange
null

How to find out list of users and their access on Sharepoint

Hello Everyone
How can i find out list of users and what access they have on SharePoint site? I want to create table with list of the users and their access?
Thanks

you can get the report using below powershell scripts. first one gives list of users in a site collection level.
The second link generates the permissions reports for each user.
http://techtrainingnotes.blogspot.com/2010/12/sharepoint-powershell-script-to-list.html
https://sp2010userperm.codeplex.com/
My Blog- http://www.sharepoint-journey.com|
If a post answers your question, please click Mark As Answer on that post and Vote as Helpful

BADI/User exit for ME18 to specifically check for Approval Level...

Hi all,
I hope this is not a repost. I have found none so far in SDN forum. However if do, please point it to me. I will gladly close this thread.
Ok, i need a userexit/badi, whichever will do, to check for user approval levels in ME18.
So far I couldn't find a user exit/Badi that is suitable in my SAP system using SMOD and the program that find user exit by TCODE.
I hope SAP do provide a user exit that can actually check for user Approval Level in ME18.
Can anyone share this info on this issue?
Thanks,
William Wilstroth

There are few enhancement points available for ME18. Please check them once.
Thanks,
Srinivas

Setting approval level for credit management in SD

Dear Gurus,
I have a case like this:
My client would like to use credit management in SD. They have few approval levels for for credit limit release.
Exp: With SD has amount under from 1000$, Mr. A has the right to approve and release it
        With SD has amount bigger than 1000$, Mr. A have to release it and then Mr. B check again afterwards Mr. B can reject and release it up to his decision.
As I see in SAP, maybe there is only one level for check and after release the SO doesn't need other approve anymore. But I am still concerning about how to find or config to satisfy this requirement.
Thank for nice support!

In our case we have maintained a view named as "ZVW_OAR_WF_CTRL" which is created by our ABAPer.
The fields in this view are
   FIELD NAME                              DATA ELEMENT         TYPE         LENGTH
1) MANDT                                          MANDT                         CLNT             3
2)PROCESS                                      ZDE_WF_PROCESS      CHAR           2
3)KKBER                                           ZDE_KKBER                  CHAR          4
4)GRUPP_F                                       ZDE_GRUPP_CM_FROM CHAR         4
5)GRUPP_T                                       ZDE_GRUPP_CM_TO      CHAR         4
6)LEVELS                                         ZDE_WF_LEVEL              CHAR         5
7)VALUE_F                                       ZDE_NETWR_AK_FROM   CURR       15
8)VALUE_T                                       ZDE_NETWR_AK_TO         CURR       15
9)APPR                                            ZDE_PLANS                       NUMC      8
10)APPR_AD1                                  ZDE_PLANS1                    NUMC       8
11)APPR_AD2                                  ZDE_PLANS1                   NUMC        8
12)BOX_AC_APPR                           ZDE_AD_SMTPADR_BOX CHAR       241
13)BOX_AC_REJC                            ZDE_AD_SMTPADR_REJ   CHAR      241
14)NEXT_LEVEL                              ZDE_WF_LEVEL_NXT         CHAR       5
You can ask your ABAPer such that your view contains the above mentioned fields and in the the approvers you have to enter the "Pernr id" s of approver s which can be taken from HR people.

Stat machine workflow task workflow status different values on different state activity(Approval level)

i have developed the State machine workflow in which i am using default workflow task
i have added one status dropdown and that is having approve or reject that i set using workflow task drop down values
now my requirement is that when my workflow goes to different approval i need to have different status values in dropdown
for example
on manager approval state activity i need to add additional status value forward to legal
but when it moved to next activity this task status field should show only approve and reject
in summary i need to have different status values for workflow task when it moved to different state activity(approval levels)
can we set these status field of task for state machine workflow programtically as well like for different approval level of task i need different status to be set for the dropdown of task status field
MCTS,ITIL

Hi Shahid Siddique,
I have seen a similar thread from you about this issue, create custom form for the seperate form is a considerable workaround, you can have a check whether it works.
http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/9baa0c32-1cde-4c58-aa7c-3568ccf0cdc9/different-approval-level-of-task-i-need-different-status-to-be-set-for-the-dropdown-of-task-status?forum=sharepointdevelopmentprevious
Thanks,
Qiao Wei
TechNet Community Support

Database table of Match approval level data in shipment more tab

hi friends
i need to know the database database table of Match approval level data in shipment > more tab of PO.
pls help. its urgent.

Hi friends
Thank you all for reply. 2-Way, 3-Way or 4-Way values are coming against particular item according to the following combination of values in inspection_required_flag and receipt_required_flag column of PO_line_locations_all.
4-WAY :Inspection_required : Y , Receipt_required : Y
3-WAY :Inspection_required : N , Receipt_required : Y
2-WAY :Inspection_required : N , Receipt_required : N
it refers there is no fixed column in table based on which 2-Way, 3-Way or 4-Way values are coming for MATCH APPROVAL LEVEL field in that form. am i right? pls response.
One more thing, inspection_required_flag and receipt_required_flag columns are also available in mtl_system_items_b. My question is when a PO is created with any item which value combination is prioritized. i mean when i open Shipment form and go to More Tab, a value for MATCH APPROVAL LEVEL field is automatically set for that item. Where does that value come from? does it come from PO_line_locations_all or mtl_system_items_b ?
if my concept is not wrong it comes from mtl_system_items_b. after saving that PO the value is then stored in PO_line_locations_all.
if my concept is wrong in any way pls let me know. Thanks
Edited by: Lisan on Jul 15, 2009 9:45 AM

OOTB Approval workflow and content approval

I have successfully utilized the OOTB Approval workflow to manage the content approval status for document libraries.
But when I attempt the same on a list (custom, links, announcements...etc)..... the approval goes through without a problem but the content approval status remains in "Pending" status.
Does the approval workflow NOT work for lists? (And only document libraries?)
I found this article that describes that the solution is to uncheck the "start this workflow when an item is changed":
http://support.microsoft.com/kb/2908491
...which is somewhat ridiculous and pretty much forces the user to have to initiate the workflow manually each time they change the item?
At any rate... I did what the article suggested and manually initiated the WF and the approval status still remains in pending mode.
Can someone help clarify this for me?
Thanks in advance

Please make sure that Publishing Approval Workflow feature is enabled in Site Collection Features. Otherwise their should be no issue.
Adnan Amin MCT, SharePoint Architect | If you find this post useful kindly please mark it as an answer.

Approver level 2 not receiving Workitem

Dear Forum contributors,
May I kindly ask you advice about the next situation?
     We have set up a WF process with 3 levels based on the SC amount.
     Requesters are able to change approvers determined by the system according to a custom criteria.
     The conflictive case goes as it follows:
o     Requester creates a SC. Three levels of approval are determined.
o     Requester changes approver level 1determined for another approver of the same level.
o     Requester changes approver level 2 determined for another approver of the same level.
o     SC is ordered.
o     Workitem goes into the approver level 1 inbox. Approver level 1 completes workitem.
o     Workitem goes into the approver level 2 inbox.
o     Approver level 2 is out of office for a long period, therefore requester enters into the SC and changes the approver level 2 for another one with the same level.
o     Work item is not going into the new approver level 2 inbox. Woritem only goes into the new approver inbox once the original one has completed the workitem.
Is this standard behavior?
Thanks in advance for your support,
Abraham

Hi,
There is a slight difference here.
WF is not being restarted. As I mentioned in the initial exposure, work item is not moving to the approver level 2 changed until the original approver level 2 has approved the work item( not the approver level 1).
u201CThe conflictive case goes as it follows:
o Requester creates a SC. Three levels of approval are determined.
o Requester changes approver level 1determined for another approver of the same level.
o Requester changes approver level 2 determined for another approver of the same level.
o SC is ordered.
o Workitem goes into the approver level 1 inbox. Approver level 1 completes workitem.
o Workitem goes into the approver level 2 inbox.
o Approver level 2 is out of office for a long period, therefore requester enters into the SC and changes the approver level 2 for another one with the same level.
o Work item is not going into the new approver level 2 inbox. Woritem only goes into the new approver inbox once the original one has completed the workitem.
Thanks for your feedback,
Abraham

Etext, xpath and custom defined level

I am using XML Publisher in EBS.
I am running into an issue with xpath syntax in an etext template.
I have XML as follows:
OutboundPaymentInstruction
+PaymentInstructionInfo
+PaymentProcessProfile
+PaymentFormat
+Instruction Totals
+Instruction Grouping
+Payer
+BankAccount
</InstructionGrouping>
+OutboundPayment
</OutboundPaymentInstruction>
From OutboundPayment level, I can navigate back to payer info by using this syntax
../InstructionGrouping/Payer/Address/AddressLine1
However, I need to define an additional level as follows:
<DEFINE LEVEL> PaymentPayee
<BASE LEVEL> OutboundPayment
<GROUPING CRITERIA> SupplierNumber
<END DEFINE LEVEL> PaymentPayee
How do I get the payer information now? I thought it should be
../../InstructionGrouping/Payer/Address/AddressLine1
as OutboundPayment is now nested below PaymentPayee, but this doesn't work. Any suggestions please?
Thank you,
Tam.

Hi
Sorry for the delay. My User got locked for some time.
I have seen the document you sent me on my email id.
 I noticed in the case where the Search help is working fine, there is no space in between the contents of the Fixed values and their short text under the value range tab of the Domain element.
But in the case, where there is a problem with the search help. There both the Fixed values and their short description is having a space in between the words.
Try maintaining COND_A instead of "COND A". Also with the short description use "COND_A" instead of "COND A".
I hope this will resolve the issue.
Update me once you have any issues.
Please reward suitable points, incase it suits your requirements.
Regards
- Atul

Audit on Match Approval Level - 2-Way, 3-Way...

Hi,
We have a requirement where user wants to audit any changes made to Match Approval Level field. If anyone changes 3-way to 2-way or 4-way to 3-way it should be tracked. Are there any audit tables for this?
Thanks
Sam

Hi Sam,
As this is a part of setup, so cannot track the history. Where as the same thing can be tracked at purchase order level. you can ask for customized report to your technical team and can identify the which match approval level has been used for that order.
Thanks & Regards
Ankur Dawra

This is my experience with MSI, and their NVIDIA GTX 570 reference card.

Hello my name is James king.
and This is my experience with MSI, and their NVIDIA GTX 570 reference card.
(5/27/12) Day one. I update my driver from Beta 301.24 To WHQL 301.42. and as you would expect, it worked. so i restart and go play kerbal space program (if you haven't played this go, play it now i love it) 5 minutes later it starts artifacting, eg. textures stretching, random green spots. "ugh" so i start troubleshooting, reinstall revert and so on. later i give up and go play Portal 2, i load the game opening screen i see lots (100-250) of little flickering green dots. first instincts says its the cable, test nope. then maybe the screen, test nope. i keep testing throughout the night, to no avail.
(5/28/12) so to the internet, for help. 3 hours later nothing, but people with bad cards. at opening i call NVIDIA Tech Support, they say to call MSI so i do. 3 calls no pick up, 4th call and i get a "Support technician" who is no help, says to fill out a RMA form online. and so i do more troubleshooting for the rest of the day. and i give up, and go to bed.
(5/29/12) i fill out a RMA form, end of day i get an email from MSI that says; "Dear Valued Customer [email] your RMA is pending approval, and you will get an email within 1 weak with shipping information.
(6/1/12) shipping information, instructions, but no shipping label.
(6/4/12) i ship the card, via UPS
(6/12/12) after using the most round about route eg. it got to MSI.
United States 06/04/2012 6:40 P.M. Order Processed: Ready for UPS
[my city], MS, United States 06/04/2012 9:10 P.M. Departure Scan
Jackson, MS, United States 06/05/2012 12:15 A.M. Arrival Scan
Maumee, OH, United States 06/07/2012 3:40 A.M. Departure Scan
Hodgkins, IN, United States 06/07/2012 7:00 A.M. Departure Scan
Hodgkins, IL, United States 06/07/2012 2:42 P.M. Departure Scan
Vernon, CA, United States 06/11/2012 10:30 P.M. Departure Scan
Baldwin Park, CA, United States 06/11/2012 11:05 P.M. Arrival Scan
Baldwin Park, CA, United States 06/12/2012 9:42 A.M. Delivered
(6/13/12) email from MSI, says they got it.
(6/14/12) email from MSI, says it is in procesing.
(6/20/12) email from MSI, saying they shipped it and that [this] is the tracking number.
(6/26/12) end of day. i receive the card, and see the case is badly scratched. i install it in my pc and hey it worked (for now). watch some YouTube, and go to play skyrim. start up load my save and i make one step, and my pc hard freezes. "sigh" half an hour later, i give up and go play minecraft 10 minutes in, and it hard freezes. so now more troubleshooting,5 hours later no luck.
(6/27/12) i have called MSI Tech Support 2 times, when they picked up the phone they say to call customer service. 7 calls later no pickup.
and that is it MSI have sent my on the run around too long.

So are you asking us for help with your PC issues or simply complaining to us about your RMA which we on this forum have nothing to do with. We are MSI product users here the same as you and we are helping each other out with problems on their PCs with their MSI parts. If you need what help we can offer assisting you with a problem then start a new topic and we'll do the best we can to help you.

[svn] 3787: Added FxTextArea, FxTextInput, and TextView class-level examples to the Component Explorer.

Revision: 3787
Author: [email protected]
Date: 2008-10-21 12:16:28 -0700 (Tue, 21 Oct 2008)
Log Message:
Added FxTextArea, FxTextInput, and TextView class-level examples to the Component Explorer.
Modified Paths:
flex/sdk/trunk/samples/explorer/explorer.xml

One workaround is to turn off automation:
File-->Options, Advanced tab, General Section, uncheck "Enable Automation Events"
However, you will loose the ability to configure callouts, and all of the commands in the Process Engineering tab.
Another workaround is to change the loop number of the shape you are editing before changing its type. Then change the loop number back to the correct loop number.
This is another example of the pernicious philosophy of trying to help the user do what the programmers think the user is trying to do that started in Excel 2000 (where you can no longer tell excel that you want a scatter plot - it will force the plot
to be a line plot under certain circumstances).
I suppose another option would be to modify the master and swap the text and subtype shapes in the indicator to use the subtype property for the loop number and then use the text for the instrument type. I guess this is what MS was trying to implement, but
didn't explain it well enough to their programmers.

Added Approver is merging in ASM approver level

Hi Experts,
We are in SRM5.0 version, when a PO is being ordered, if i add a valid approver at the preliminay approver level, i.e before the preliminary approver it will go for the approval to his inbox and then the preliminary approver.
Suppose I have a PO with one Preliminary approver and 2 ASM approvers.
At the ASM level, if i add a valid approver at the second level i.e before ASM approver, the approver will get added and when I refresh the PO, the added approver will display at the added ASM level.
When the First level of approver i.e preliminary approver approvers the PO, the PO will go to the next level for approval.
But here the added approver is being merged with the ASM approver, and when i check the node id of the added approver will be deleted.
Kindly let me know if this is a standard behaviour in SRM 5.0, if not then at what class/method/FM/BADI this merging of the ASM approvers is taking place.
Many Thanks in advance
Regards
Ahmed

Can you please check whether the first user has approved the cart or not ?
Check the workflow LOG in SWI1 and there you can see the details, why the workitem is not being sent.
~Mani

Unreleased PO/SA and their Approval Level

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for