User Identities being automatically disabled by System

Greetings,
This is a weird one. Had devices failing PEAP authentication because internal user disabled.Checked Administration > Identities > Users and sure enough user was disabled. Re-enabled, but next day same thing. Reviewed configuration logs and found that "System" was disabling the account every night at midnight.
At first this was just one user identity but now it is affecting all.
Doesn't affect endpoint identities, only users.
We are on version 1.1.4 patch 2. We cannot move to a newer patch until Cisco resolves a separate issue for us.
Thanks for any ideas, I am opening a TAC case.

There is a setting for local accounts to expire when password has not been changed in 60 days. Disable the setting, or change your passwords. Administration --> Identity Management --> Settings --> User Password Policy.
Please uncheck the option and try again.
~BR
Jatin Katyal
**Do rate helpful posts**

Similar Messages

User end dated automatically

Hi,
We are using 11.5.9. We noticed, for one of the active employee, user account is end dated automatically. I checked the record histroy of it, it shows,
"Updated By : <shows this employee's manager user account>".
"System Logon: Unknown" and
"Terminal : Concurrent".
I checked the responsibilities owned by this employee's manager who have only self service responsibilities. There is neither concurrent program nor function related to sysadmin user define screen is attached.
This issue occured to only one employee. How it would have happened?
Thanks in advance.

Hi;
Please review:
We want to disable 100+ users, can we simply update end_date in fnd_user. Or we need to update wf_user_roles etc.
disabling user in FND_USER
Automatically disable user accounts after specific number days Oracle Apps
Re: Automatically disable user accounts after specific number days Oracle Apps
which users should not be end dated
Re: which users should not be end dated ?
Setting specific timeline for user login in EBS
Re: Setting specific timeline for user login in EBS
To Find Users with end dated responsibilities
Re: SQL Query - To Find Users with end dated responsibilities
Regard
Helios

Automatically Login Windows System User In TestStand 3.1

I have checked the "Automatically Login Windows System User" in TestStand 3.1. However, when I re-start TestStand I still have to enter the password each time. Why is this happening? Both the username and password do exist in the Users.ini file. I am using Windows XP SP3. I have already talked to a NI support engineer and they did not have an answer. Thanks for the help.
Felix

Hi ic2118,
Can you move the Users.ini file (C:\Program Files\National Instruments\TestStand 3.1\Cfg) to a new location and restart TestStand. The file may have been corrupted and moving it out of the Cfg folder will force TestStand to create the file again.
Regards,
Michael M
NI Americas | AE

Automatically disable user accounts after specific number days Oracle Apps

Hi All,
Is there a way, using group policy or any other method to automatically disable a user account if it hasnt been used (ie,, no has logged on using that account) after a certain amount of days??
This is something I would like to apply enterprise wide, so setting expiry dates on each users object is out, and obviously I only want to apply this to inactive accounts.
Thanks in advance
Saquib

Saquib,
There is no such profile option. However, you can write a code to check LAST_LOGON_DATE in FND_USER table and based on this you can disable/lock the account.

How can I disable the system feature which automatically restarts applications i had open during a previous session ?

How can I disable the system feature which automatically restarts applications i had open during a previous session ?

When you log out, uncheck the box to reopen applications. If you're still using 10.7.3, then you will have to uncheck the back with each shutdown or restart.
10.7.4 update was suppose to fix it that when you uncheck the box, it should remain unchecked for restarts after that.
For the resume features, check this link:
http://reviews.cnet.com/8301-13727_7-20083707-263/managing-mac-os-x-lions-applic ation-resume-feature/?tag=mncol;title

System Automatically Disable Data Block

I always have my account Data Block enabled so that I will not be charged data usage. When I have the new Kin TwoM set up, I did not know the Data Block was automatically disabled without noticed. I thought that the phone was using home WiFi until I saw the data usage was 70MB. For $2 per MB, it is $140. Verizon is so rediculous to do this kind of trick.

ouch. sorry to hear that.
when i activated my kin via the website, i read in the new term sheet that my data block were not there. so after activating i immediately checked and blocked it again. i think because of this, i am now constantly checking #3282 and online account because like in your case, i wouldn't want to be charged for that much of money just because somehow it is "unblocked".
maybe u can explain your case to the customer service ppl?

Can I maually check for updates but prevent them from being automatically installed if it turns out one is available?

Can I maually check for updates but prevent them from being automatically installed if it turns out one is available?
Background:
In options I have "check for updates, but let me choose whether to install them" ticked. This works fine, in that I periodically receive a notice of an available update, and it will ask me whether I want to I want to install it.
But there are certain times -- for reasons I won't go into here (unless requested as part of seeking a solution) -- where I want to manually check for new versions, but RETAIN the ability to decide whether or not to install it. But if I click Help/About Firefox/Check for Updates, and it finds an update, it will immediately proceed to install it without asking for permission. While that seems quite inconsistent with my update preferences in Options, it is apparently normal behavior as described in https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/update-firefox-latest-version#w_how-do-i-manually-check-for-updates.
So is there any way I can manually check for new-update availability but then refuse the update if I so choose? Once an unwanted install begins, I'm concerned that if I click cancel I could end up with a partial installation or some "messed up," duplicated or corrupted FF files (e.g., multiple versions appended with (1), (2) etc, similar to what sometimes confusingly happens when I do an XP System Restore).
Thanks.

I think what needs to be made very clear here is that when a user clicks on "check for updates" the software should bloody well CHECK for updates and most certainly SHOULD NOT proceed to download and apply any updates. this is misleading and intrusive.
I just wanted to check if there was an updated version but I DID NOT want to actually update at that moment. the software downloaded data, costing me money and tried to apply the update which could have potentially messed up my settings if I had not checked everything was ok first.
I actually discovered how to prevent the update by searching through windows and manually deleting the files but why should anyone have to go to such lengths?
the software should simply do as it is asked, not do things that have most certainly not been asked.

Need help about tags being automatically translated by BC

One of our biggest client operates in Brazil. Unfortunately BC currently has no Portuguese version and some tags within BC are automatically translated by the engine as for example the {module_webformresults}. We have no choice but to select Spanish as the default language for the site and you can see the results here: http://prntscr.com/113rw7 We know that one option is to use custom fields instead of the email, address, etc fields provide by BC, but this not a good choice because we still have some texts being automatically translated in spanish by BC. Furthermore, if a customer fills wrongly a field, the pop up warning window show the text in Spanish too and we are not able to translate to Portuguese.
Someone have a good advice, besides to tell BC to built a Portuguese version? (which we already offer to them to translate the dictionaries but they didn´t accept it.)

WELL. Finally, we got an answer from BC:
Mihai Tica (Adobe Business Catalyst Support)
Apr 26 16:39 (EEST)
I am afraid adding a new culture in the system is not an easy task, and it's not on our near term roadmap.
As a workaround you can use the steps described in this article - http://forums.adobe.com/docs/DOC-2363 (scroll down to "Redirecting the Web Form confirmation page") to redirect the user to a custom webpage you can style according to your needs (customize the message displayed).
Regarding the alert messages displayed by the webform validation script those are even easier to customize. Simply open up the page the form is inserted to and translate the error messages.
The output of the {module_webformresults} module can also be customized using javascript. This way you can basically change any text into any placeholder on the site's front-end.
Using this method is really simple, take a look at this tutorial - http://www.w3schools.com/jquery/html_text.asp
And here is a more detailed description of how to change text strings using jQuery - http://api.jquery.com/text/
The only thing that cannoe be translated is the email the customer receives by email, the strings there cannot be altered unfortunately using the method described above.
I have also forwarded this as an enhancement request to the product management team. They will ***** its priority and decide when this feature will be implemented in one of the future releases.
Kind regards,
Mihai Tica.

MSSQL 2005 user database now shows up in system database folder

While attempting to set up sql replication in MSSQL 2005 one of my user databases is now in the systems database folder. I need to move it back to the user databases folder. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

I'm still at the point where if I run
sp_detach_db 'dbname'
I get
Msg 3724, Level 16, State 1, Line 1
Cannot drop the database 'dbname' because it is being used for replication.
If I right click on the replication folder I have no disbributor properties
Somehow I need to remvoe the replication flag from the db that I have accidentally gotten it stuck on.
Any ideas?
Hello dsams,
Are you a member of "sysadmin" fixed server role ? If not you will not be able to configure replication.
Once you are a member of "sysadmin" then you can try the below sql or go to replication and right click on it, you will get "Disable publishing & distribution".
use master
go
alter database distribution set offline;
drop database distribution;
Regards, RSingh

Guys, every time I download app on iPhone, i get message that "your user id has been disabled''

guys, every time I download app on iPhone, i get message that "your user id has been disabled'

That is exactly what happened to me! I wrote to Apple and they informed me that my account had been disabled because somebody had made a complaint that their credit card had been used to buy stuff on my account without their consent thus my account was disabled and it was a permanant thing. They suggested I set up a new Id, explained I could still use my apps but would not be able to update them. I wrote back to them explaining that there was no way I would have done such a thing, that I felt that I was being penalised over something I had not control over and I had bought my apps in good faith expecting to be able to update them as required. I also pointed out that a little while ago I found that my account had suddenly changed to a USA based one so that I had reset it and the password along with the credit card attached to it. I didn't really think much about it but now I wonder if I had been hacked.
I did get a very nice email back saying that they would investigate but having waited a few days I just got an email from a supervisor saying they had closed the account, there would be no further information given and I could look at their terms and conditions. I haven't been even been told what apps were supposedly bought through my account to see if there has been a genuine mix-up with credit cards through the banking system. I feel somewhat besmirched by the whole affair; I would never do anything illegal or misuse my account but despite being a loyal Apple customer who has promoted their products at every given opportunity, both professionally and socially, I have been summararily dismissed without being given the chance to defend myself or my reputation.

No users are being migrated to the Unified Contact Store (UCS) for Lync 2013 - Exchange 2013

I'm having difficulty getting the unified contact store to work on a migrated Lync/Exchange environment. Both servers have been upgraded to 2013 CU2, and almost everything appears to be working properly...except UCS.
By default the global CsUserServicesPolicy has UcsAllowed set to True. In that mode, none of the Lync users were being migrated to UCS, so I set the global policy to False and created a new Policy called "AllowUCS" and set UcsAllowed to True. I then
assigned that policy to myself and a couple other test accounts. Still, my contacts are not being migrated to the UCS after logging in with Lync 2013.
Other Lync/Exchange integration features are working properly. I have set up OAuth, and it tests successfully, and Lync integration with OWA is working successfully, so I know at least some communication is happening properly between the servers.
Here is what I'm getting when I run some diagnostics from the Lync server:
PS C:\Users\administrator> get-csuser jdoe |FL Name,UserServicesPolicy
Name : Jon Doe
UserServicesPolicy: AllowUCS
PS C:\Users\administrator> Get-CsUserServicesPolicy |FL
Identity : Global
UcsAllowed : False
Identity : Tag:AllowUCS
UcsAllowed : True
PS C:\Users\administrator> Debug-CsUnifiedContactStore -Identity [email protected] |FL
UcsMigrationAttemptCount : 0
LastUcsMigrationAttempt :
SipUri : [email protected]
UcsMode : Disabled
PS C:\Users\administrator> Debug-CsUnifiedContactStore -PoolFqdn lync.domain.org
FrontEnd : lbclync.domain.org
UcsDisabledCount : 141
UcsAllowedCount : 0
UcsMigratingCount : 0
UcsMigratedCount : 0
FailedUserData :
PS C:\Users\administrator> Test-CsUnifiedContactStore -UserSipAddr
ess [email protected] -TargetFqdn lync.domain.org
Target Fqdn :lync.domain.org
Result : Failure
Latency : 00:00:00.0654970
Error Message : User has not been migrated. Verify that the user has a mailbox
in Exchange and that the user has been migrated.
Diagnosis :
Anyone know what I am missing?

Hi,
Please make sure the user has been provisioned with an Exchange 2013 mailbox and has signed into the mailbox at least once.
If the user logs in with a Lync 2010 or earlier client, or if the user is not connected to an Exchange 2013 server, the user services policy is ignored and the user's contacts remain in Lync Server.
Please also check the registry key on the client computer:
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Office\15.0\Lync\<SIP URL>\UCS
If the user's contacts are stored in Exchange 2013, this key contains a value of InUCSMode with a value of 2165.
Kent Huang
TechNet Community Support

What is the user exit for automatic account determination in PO

Hi Experts
I ned to know what is the user exit for automatic account determination in PO
my client needs the document type to defines Account Assignment Category.
choosen a document type Account Assignment Category is defined automatically. you can't choose
a wrong Account Assignment Category from the drop down list.
thanks form you help.

If this is the case than why don't you use the Transaction variant
SHD0: http://www.mortenhjorthnielsen.dk/Security/transactionvariants.htm
If you have knowledge of Transaction variant then you can use SHD0 tcode and generate the transaction using default type and give that transaction to user instead of ME21N so they will not have the issue.
The exact solution for your problem is as follows
Go to Tcode SHD0 and enter the transaction variant
In T code field enter ME21N and then enter the ZXXXX or the name you want to keep in transaction variant field and hit create button
This will take you to ME21N transaction and here you just enter the data but make sure you enter the A/c which you want to default.
Once you finish system will save this one as a variant
Every time you hit or enter the pop up screen comes here you just hit enter and whichever data you want to default that you have to select in the Popup by checking the Box
W content and output only for your case the field XXXXXXXX should be selected for W content and output only
Make sure you have value 1 in contents field
If not then restart the variant again and on the ME21Nscreen reselect the invoice field
Later exit and save (save in the object which you can transport)
Then from SHD0 transaction select GOTO create variant transaction and here you careate the tcode and use that tcode for ME21N (e.g ZTRAN - For specifix sto)

Assignment field being automatically populated in Vendor Credit Memo

Dears,
While posting Vendor Credit Memo with Reference Invoice (field Inv.Ref under Payment tab) the Assignment field (field Assign. under Details tab) is being automatically populated with assignment value from the referenced invoice.
Is there a way to disable automatic Assignment field population?
Thanks in advance,
Robert

Dears,
No sorting keys exist for GL Master Vendor reconciliation account and still assignment is being copied (Data was copied
Message no. F5343)
Substitution is not an option as it's being done when posting, and not at the moment of invoice creation.
Thank you for any ideas.
Best regards,
Robert

CUA-User does not exist in Child system

Hi All,
User has been created in child system through central system,and respective roles also assigned through central system.Now,the issue is when user is trying to log in child system,it's showing user does not exist.
I did Text comparison also,status is okay.
Kindly help!
Regards,
Naveen

Hi,
Could you just login to the child system and view the userid created through su01?
1. In case you are unable to do the same, there is certainly a problem with idoc distribution for which you can find the reasons in SCUL.
2. In case the userid exists in child syatem, you need to check if address data for the userid is being maintained in child system or not.
In case you get an error message " Address data not maintained" while viewing the userid through su01 in the child system, then you need to execute report RSADRCK2 in the child system.
You may refer to the following link in this case:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_sm32/helpdata/en/85/91cd3b11571962e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm

CUA: Distribute users from central to specified child systems

Hello!
I've a question concerning CUA: I've added two new systems to our CUA. Now I want to destribute the users of the central-system to the new child-systems accompanied by assigning a specifed role for the child-systems. Unfortunately, the user maintanance - mass changes (SU10) does not support assigning the child-systems to users.
Is there any other possibility (perhaps a report) to automatically distribute the users or is it necessary to access each user manually and assign the child-systems and roles.
Any hint would be appreciated!
Thanks in advance!
Greetings
Wolfgang

Sorry, I was convinced that mass changes don't work for systems - but they do! Next time I'm going to check possibilities in more detail!
Greetings
Wolfgang

User Identities being automatically disabled by System

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for