Value type 61 (Down Payments) may not be carried forward in FM area

Hi Friends,
We have implemented Fund management in FY 2011. My requirement is i want carry forword budget down payment to nex fiscal year , plz suggest to configuration step , Process and Impact on Existing system.
In FM budget When i m trying to carry forward down payment which is recorded under PO through T code - "FMJ_ANZ " system showing me error.
"Value type 61 (Down Payments) may not be carried forward in FM area 9000
Message no. FI741
Diagnosis
Due to the settings for the selected update profile or due to the Customizing settings for the closing operations in FM, no carryforward is allowed in FM area 9000 for value type 61 (Down Payments) in the commitment budget and/or payment budget.
Procedure
Delete the entry for this value type or select a different value type, assign an update profile to the FM area which allows this value type to be carried forward, or change the Customizing settings for the closing operations in FM.
Plz sugeest me config step, Process , and impact on existing scnerio.
Regards
Raheem

Hi Team ,
I have change Profile from "000102 to 000400 " and allow valu type 61 for carry forward in testing server after that budget down poayment carry forward to new FY successfuly ,
But when i am trying to make service entry sheet using ML81N system showing another error," 098 Changing the assignment of payment or commitment budget is not allowed" Snap shot is attached. is anything missed out.
plz sugeest me what have to do in this case

Similar Messages

Account 'Acquisition: down payments' could not be found for area 01

Hi,
In our PO there is a 8 line items. We want to create GRN by taking 2 line items at a time. It is Asset's PO and GRN. During GRN we select two line items check box including item OK check box. Click on Check button which shows as green signal. Click on POST button it shows error message as " Account 'Acquisition: down payments' could not be found for area 01". But previously lot of GRN were passed through this asset's GL account. But in asset accounting account determination is still exist against this asset. What is the probable solution ?
Regards,
Samrat

Hi Venkat,
I want to clarify one thing this 'Acquisition Down Payment' for asset accounting is required for account allocations which are used in asset classes for assets under construction. But It is not an asset under construction. No GL account was maintained against this Acquisition Down Payment before the issue raised. Lot of entries were passed through the same GL account before. What is the reason for asking this type of GL account ?
Regards,
Samrat

DP90 - Rebilling with down payment OSS Note 858703

Hello Gurus,
Even configuring customers test system according above mentioned OSS Note 858703 with order type TAF I do not get the process running.... When starting order creation (VA01) system doe not allow to enter sold-to and ship-to customer numbers.
This alone stops any testing.
Does anyone of you has experience or at least a clue what to do to resolve this? E.g. For testing I customized order type TA as ZTA and same same as order tpye TAF and it was possible to enter sold-to and ship-to party.
Any hind is very welcome as a customer waits for solution.
Many thanks in advance!!
Rgds, Carsten

Carsten
I just found out the reason why the system does not allow to enter sold-to and ship-to customer numbers:
"There is no partner determination procedure" assigned to order type TAF". This seems to be the way SAP delivers this order type.
So go there and assign whatever is the procedure you used for your other orders or create a new procedure and assign it, it will work fine.
By the way billling with down payment is not implemented at my customer site, I just tested with TAF order and it was behaving exactly as you described.
Then on a hunch I went and saw if there is a Partner Det procedure and there is none.
Path: SPRO/IMG/Sales and Distribution/Basic Functions/Partner Determination/Set Up Partner Determination and then
Set Up Partner Determination for Sales Document Header/Partner Determination Procedure Assignment
Hope this helps you, cheers.

AP Down Payment Invoice not yet Draw Report

Hi All,
I'm trying to make a query of the AP Down Payment Invoice not Yet draw Report. Can any one tell me which table I should refer when I need to make a query? I checked the ODPO tables that's no field indicate that the Downpayment not yet draw. I also tried the ODPI table when I use that to draw the downpayment invoice to AP invoice. When I query that table it return me 0 line.
Please advice.
Looking forward advice and reply.
Thank you.
Regards,
Foong Yee

AP Down Payment Clearing Account has debit balance if it is not drawn to AP invoice.
Use General Ledger Report,Select AP Down Payment Clearing Account,Select this G/L account,
Select reqd. posting dates,Click Ok.
Now you can see AP Down Payment Invoice not yet Draw Report.

Amount to draw from down payment is not set in document currency

hi,
i always get the error "amount to draw from down payment is not set in document currency" when i try to update a draft of invoice with down payment.
i do the following:
1. sales order
2. down payment
3. income payment
4. delivery note
5. invoice
5.1 save as draft by di api
5.2 get draft by key
5.3 do some changes, for example change comments by di api
5.4 update draft by diapi <--- the error is thrown!
If i do this on screen everything works fine. But by sdk its not working.
System: SAP 8.8 SP00 PL20
Is there a solution for this problem?
best regards
Markus

Hi Markus,
What if you update the same draft from UI instead of by diapi? Do you still get error message?
Thanks,
Gordon

Down payments status not cleared.

Hi,
We are working with down payments by standard customizing. Everything works fine if the Down payment request has status cleared before the invoices, however If the down payment request still with status not cleared the following invoices doesnu2019t get the down payment and we can bill all the items from the milestone billing and if the down payment still not cleared it never appear in the invoices. So at the end the sales orders have sent to the client a bigger amount. That is a situation is wrong and we would like to avoid in order to avoid a lot of problems with our clients because the system doesnu2019t give any warning informing about you have send to the client the 120% of the sales order, if we have bill a down payment request for 20%. Our understanding the system always should get the down payment in the invoices or at least give a warning when you finish the billing without clear the down payments. We would like to know the right way to manage this situation.
Thank you and best regards.

HI Venkat,
Sorry Venkat. It is the clarance in F-54 not the Revesal.
After clearance, the amount 29.000,00 is posted to Vendor Spl GL. So nullified this account.
Once cleared, the amount is posted to Normal Vendor ac as 34.510,00 (Doc 1700000043)
So this doc is not picked in Payment Run.
Invoice amount is 49.623,00-. So the difference 15113 (49.623,00-34.510,00) should be cleared in Payment run. It is not done.
My assumption is there is the amount difference between Normal Vendor to Speial Vendor (34,510 - 29000). Is it the cause to not picked the doc 1700000043 in payment run.
Please advise what I can do?
Thanks
Venkat

Photo will not upload my pictures from the same camera that always worked in IPhoto. Says "could not be imported (may be unrecognized file type or files may not contain valid data). So how do I do it?

Photo will not upload new photos from same camera that always worked in IPhoto. Says "could not be uploaded )may be unrecognized file type or files may not contain valid data). Help!

Try image capture or a card reader - after the photos are safely on your Mac then use the camera's format command to reformat the memory card
LN

Entity type "EJB-JAR" may not be used in public part "ejbjar_api"

Experts,
Can you please help me to identify why the error 'Entity type "EJB-JAR" may not be used in public part "ejbjar_api", unsupported purpose.' appears on NWDS while creating a project on a DC and how can this be resolved.
Thanks in advance
-Lave

Hi Jain,
is the error message that the public part is not found prefixed with [dcmake]? If yes that rather points in the direction that there is a problem with the metadata information. (PP name not correctly spelled, renamed after initial creation, perhaps even some problems with upper/lower-case letters depending on your platform.)
What SP are you using? The log looks like some rather old build plugins are used on a newer NWDI installation.
The warning from the [wdgen] task and the subsequent failure of the [wdminimizer] can be ignored. "ERROR: Non Fatal Error" is a bit quaint, but it really is not fatal. It just means that the minimizer didn't find the data required to operate. The [wdgen] warning means that the WebDynpro generator could not write the information. So the jar files in your public part are maybe a bit bigger than necessary but that's all.
Best regards,
Marc

Vendor Down Payment should not exceed Total PO Value

Dear All,
We want to restric the Vendor Down payment to total PO value and system must not allow to post the Down payment more that Total PO value.
Eg.
Material value - 1000
Tax 100
Other charges 150
Total PO Value - 1250/-
Now when we make down payment to the above vendor against the PO,the system must not allow us to make down payment more then 1250/-.
Do suggest.
Regards,

Hi,
You need to write validation rule & user exit for checking PO amount with down payment.
Whenever you post a down payment with reference to PO, in PO header, there is a status tab where you can check the status of PO i.e down pymt made, GR done etc., so write a user exit on that basis.
Regards
Anuj

Down Payment entries not reflecting in J1INMIS report

Dear Guru's,
TDS deducted at the time of down payment made to vendor is not reflecting in J1inmis report.
Is J1INMIS report does not reflect down payment entries?
What will be the reason for this?
Which alternative report to followed for J1INMIS !!!
Waiting for your positive reply.
Regards,
Sany.

Hi Sany,
To update Business Place & Section Code, execute the program given below. After execution of the program run T.Code J1INPP and your issue should get resolved. Let me know if this works.
Ask the Abaper to write the following Code & execute the program:
REPORT ZFI_BUP_SEC_CHANGE.
TABLES : BSIK,BSAK,BSEG.
parameters: PA_BELNR TYPE BSEG-BELNR OBLIGATORY,
            PA_BUKRS TYPE BSEG-BUKRS OBLIGATORY,
            PA_GAAHR TYPE BSEG-GJAHR OBLIGATORY.
PARAMETERS : PA_BUPLA TYPE BSEG-BUPLA NO-DISPLAY,
             PA_SECCO TYPE BSEG-SECCO NO-DISPLAY.
PA_BUPLA = 'MUM'.                               (Note : Use the Business place & section Code Used
PA_SECCO = 'MUM'.                                         in your company code).
START-OF-SELECTION.
PERFORM CHANGE_DATA.
END-OF-SELECTION.
*&      Form CHANGE_DATA
      text
--> p1        text
<-- p2        text
FORM CHANGE_DATA .
DATA : LT_BSEG TYPE TABLE OF BSEG WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSIK TYPE TABLE OF BSIK WITH HEADER LINE,
       LT_BSAK TYPE TABLE OF BSAK WITH HEADER LINE.
BSeg updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSEG
FROM BSEG
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSEG.
IF LT_BSEG-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSEG-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSEG-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSEG-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSEG FROM LT_BSEG.
    Write : / LT_BSEG-BELNR, 'Update For BSEG', LT_BSEG-BSCHL,
              LT_BSEG-BUPLA,LT_BSEG-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
Bsik updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSIK
FROM BSIK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSIK.
IF LT_BSIK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSIK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSIK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSIK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSIK FROM LT_BSIK.
    Write : / LT_BSIK-BELNR, 'Update For BSIK', LT_BSIK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSIK-BUPLA,LT_BSIK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
BsAk updation
SELECT *
INTO CORRESPONDING FIELDS OF TABLE LT_BSAK
FROM BSAK
WHERE BUKRS = PA_BUKRS   AND
      GJAHR = pa_gaahr   AND
      BELNR = PA_BELNR.
LOOP AT LT_BSAK.
IF LT_BSAK-BSCHL    = '25' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '26'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '27' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '28'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '35' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '36'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '37' OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '38'
     OR LT_BSAK-BSCHL = '39'.
    LT_BSAK-BUPLA = PA_BUPLA.
    LT_BSAK-SECCO = PA_SECCO.
    MODIFY BSAK FROM LT_BSAK.
    Write : / LT_BSAK-BELNR, 'Update For BSAK', LT_BSAK-BSCHL,
              LT_BSAK-BUPLA,LT_BSAK-SECCO.
ENDIF.
ENDLOOP.
ENDFORM.                    " CHANGE_DATA
Thank You.

A/R down payment invoice not allowing tax

Hi Experts,
We use SAP Business One 2007A PL-08. While posting A/R down payment with percentage on DPM (For example 50%), the system is not calculating GST on it though we put the GST tax code in the invoice.
Any idea how this can be resolved?
Is there a workaround for this?
Thank you,

Thanks Gordon. As a workaround, we created a dummy item number for the GST to be input into the A/R Down payment invoice. The problem here is that when we add a line item for the GST using this item number, the G/L account is defaulting to customer deposits account and its now allowing us to change the G/L account to the relevant GST G/L. Is there a way we can change the G/L?
Please let me know!!
Thanks

PO down payment is not picking FI substitution rule.

Hi All,
We have an issue with PO down payment and clearing. We have a
substitution rule on line item level as per company code were default profit
center is set. But while doing ME2DP, profit center is picking from PO account
assignment and overriding our substitution rule. We did try with complete
document substitution rule also but not worked.
Clearing of the pre-payment is deriving the profit center of
the account assignment on the PO, overriding our profit center substitution.
This is only happening with PO down payment. Please let me
know any solution.

Hi Rakesh
If the Down payment GL you are referring to is a Balance sheet account, your substitution should work.. How have you written your substitution? Can you give a screen shot?
But if you are referring to the Down Payment Cost Element assigned against your Controlling area, system is correct... For a cost element, PC is always derived from the associated CO object
br, Ajay M

Clearing Customer down payment for down payment amount not equal to Customer Invoice amount

Dear All,
               Below process are posting Customer transaction directly via FI without SD cycle.
            Customer down payment = 102 INR
            Customer Invoice = 103 INR
While doing Customer clearing w.r.t Invoice system has cleared the down payment document but posted an open item in Customer account with clearing document number of value Rs 102 .
Concern:-
               1) How 1 INR difference will be countered , via receipt payment from customer from bank account ?
               2) In case we have defined tolerance limit of 5% for Customer and this come to be > 1 INR ,does SAP provide clearing Customer items
                   automatically via any Standard Customer clearing process based on rule defined ?
Pls suggest
Regards
MJ

Hi,
the information of the exchange rates used for down payments, is
stored in table TCURR ( exchange rates)
For the request down payment the actual exchange rate of table TCURR
or the rate of document header is taken.
When this down payment request is payed, also the exchange rate of
the actual day (TCURR) is taken.
That´s why the amount in the bank posting in local currency result
from translating the foreign currency amount at the current rate,
instead of resulting from the total of the local currency amounts
from the settled items.
Regards,
Attila

Down payment doc not cleared in Payment Run F110

Dear Friends,
Document 1700000043 is a reversal of down payment which should be settle with final invoice 5400212994. Both documents have the same due date, but only 5400212994 was cleared with a payment run.
Please can anybody clarify why document 1700000043 was not cleared with a payment run.
I checked in Exception list and found error message as "No Payment possible because Items with a debit balance still exists; see job log"
User follow the below process:
1) Downpayment made as below on 08.10.2009
Vendor                                   29.000,00
LC El PaymClrng Ac               34.510,00-
Payables Tax Input                  5.510,00
1) GR posgted on 26.11.2009
            Engineering Service   41.700,00
            GR/IR - Services         41.700,00-
3) IR posted on 26.11.2009 and Net due date 23.12.2009
         Vendor                           49.623,00-
          GR/IR                              41.700,00
          Payables Tax Input           7.923,00
4) Downpayment Reversal on 26.11.2009
      Vendor (PK 39)                 29.000,00-
       Venfor (PK 26)                34.510,00
       Payables Tax Input           5.510,00-
Please check above process and let me know if any details are needed for further.
Thanks,
Venkat

HI Venkat,
Sorry Venkat. It is the clarance in F-54 not the Revesal.
After clearance, the amount 29.000,00 is posted to Vendor Spl GL. So nullified this account.
Once cleared, the amount is posted to Normal Vendor ac as 34.510,00 (Doc 1700000043)
So this doc is not picked in Payment Run.
Invoice amount is 49.623,00-. So the difference 15113 (49.623,00-34.510,00) should be cleared in Payment run. It is not done.
My assumption is there is the amount difference between Normal Vendor to Speial Vendor (34,510 - 29000). Is it the cause to not picked the doc 1700000043 in payment run.
Please advise what I can do?
Thanks
Venkat

Down payment document not picking up the PC , but picking up the segment

Dear Sir/Madam,
We are making one down payment against a Purchase order through T code: F-48 in the vendor line item we are putting the PO reference. It picks up the segment on the basis of PO, but is is not picking up the Profit center in the general ledger view. This does not allow to post the down payment entry.
KIndly advice how the same can be resolved.
Prashant Zinge

Hi,
By default the payment will go to the bank that is listed first in the vendor master. If you do not need the old details, delete them completely from the master data and leave only the new ones. Alternatively use the Partner Bank field to assign the invoice to which Bank the payment is to be made.
Kind regards

Value type 61 (Down Payments) may not be carried forward in FM area

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for