VAT Inclusive in basic cost in PO

Dear All,
In case where (Excise+ VAT) is inclusive in basic price of PO.
Excise can be handelled by ticking the MRP indicator in MIGO and by changing the Base value in the MIRO.
But if the VAT condition is deductible and also inclusive in the PO.
As there is no accounting Entry of VAT Condition during MIGO and accounting comes during MIRO , so how to handle this scenario, so that correct accounting should come and right amount should hit the VAT payable GL.
please Clarify.
Thanks & Regards
Nitin Chhabra

Hi,
I am not sure whether I got your question correctly.
Which Tax Procedure are you using?
If its TAXINJ, then create a PO with a 0% taxcode & as you mentioned change the base amount during MIGO & post the excise. In case of VAT, at the time of MIRO select a VAT tax code manually & enter the amount in MIRO on which you want to calculate VAT.
System will calculate the tax on the amount you enter & will post the same to Separate G/L.
Hope its clear.
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • Can you set up VAT Inclusive Freight prices in SAP?

    This was originally posted on the SDK forum. I have posted here to request answers as to whether VAT Inclusive prices can be configured in SAP specifically for Freight Lines or also for general product/sales products.
    I am integrating a 3rd party web site order into SAP B1. The site can only provide VAT Inclusive Prices and cannot provide the VAT rate or code - that SAP order will be loaded with the VAT rate taken from the BP / Item matrix.
    This is not a problem when creating order lines as I can use the <PriceAfterVAT> element (using DI Server). However when adding Freight Lines to the B1 order there is no equivalent element. It appears that I can only add a value excluding VAT.
    Is there any way of adding a VAT Inclusive values to a Freight Line (either manually or via sdk)?
    Can Freight Items be set up so that the value can be entered as Vat Inclusive?
    Can Price lists be set up as VAT Inclusive prices?
    I would prefer not to have to caluclate and enter the VAT exlcusive price as this involves mimicing the Web Sites VAT Matrix calculation and hoping that this mimics the SAP VAT calculation and hopefully not ending up with rounding problems. Note that the Web Site has already taken payment via credit card and the invoice from SAP must match the Web Transaction.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Nick
    Edited by: Philip Eller on May 14, 2008 8:58 AM
    Edited by: Philip Eller on May 28, 2008 8:41 AM*

    Hi Nick,
    Try to create the freight as a non inventory item. Create an item master data, lets say Freight. Un-tick option for "Inventory". Set the g/l for revenue just like you set in the freight setup. Set default vat code in the sales tab.
    So what you have to do to input the freight is to add 1 additional item (freight) and put the price after vat like you required.
    Hope it'll works
    Dody

  • Basic Cost Accounting - Starter Pack Funtionality

    The Starter Pack does not included Basic Cost Accounting - what exactly dont you get regarding Basic Cost Accounting with the Starter Pack? (No Cost Centres and Projects)
    Thank you in advance..

    Hi, ok..let me explain again. I have seen this comparison. I also viewed the SAP Starter Package Solution brief that had this comparison on page 2. I realize it shows that no Basic Cost Accounting is available. Based on this, I asked a question here on the forum.
    I would like to know what does this mean? What does the NO Basic Cost Accounting not include? Is it NO Profit Centres, NO Projects or what.
    I think the question is really straight forward and simple.
    Thank you

  • Basic Cost Accounting

    The Starter Pack does not included Basic Cost Accounting - what exactly dont you get regarding Basic Cost Accounting with the Starter Pack? (No Cost Centres, Projects, Segmentation etc..??)
    Thank you in advance..

    Hi, ok..let me explain again. I have seen this comparison. I also viewed the SAP Starter Package Solution brief that had this comparison on page 2. I realize it shows that no Basic Cost Accounting is available. Based on this, I asked a question here on the forum.
    I would like to know what does this mean? What does the NO Basic Cost Accounting not include? Is it NO Profit Centres, NO Projects or what.
    I think the question is really straight forward and simple.
    Thank you

  • Excise Duty Inclusive in basic price

    Dear Experts,
    when the excise duty is included in the price, we enable the check box MRP Indicator in the excise tab while doing MIGO and based on this the GRN will be posted deducting the excise values from the price.
    but the trouble is, while doing MIRO, the system is not taking the posted value in GRN, rather the basic price plus the excise duty. How to overcome this to that the value proposed by the system is exclusive of excise duty?
    regards
    Suresh

    hi,
    say the value is 10,000 which is inclusive of 1000 excise duty.
    while posting the GRN we will enable the MRP indicator and based on this the GRN value will be posted as 9000 and the 1000 will be captured as excise duty
    but while doing the MIRO, either by giving the Purchase order or Delivery note as the reference, the value proposed by the system is 10,000 and not 9000. I know that we can change the values, but the client requires that the system has to propose the value as 9000 instead of 10,000
    hope it is clear
    suresh
    Edited by: rasuresh on Feb 26, 2010 1:15 PM

  • VAT posted in Capex cost to be reversed to actual VAT Account

    In Capex PO, you are using XF tax code ( Excise duty + 12.5% VAT). But as per tax code configuration, 12.5% VAT become non detuctible, and its creating problem in capitalization as VAT get added in Capex cost.
    whether we can use following procedure to transfer VAT component manually from CWIP to VAT on Hold Account.  
    Transaction Code - ABSO
    Transaction Type  - 101 (Negative assets acquisition )
    Or any other procedure is there
    Please confirm

    Hi,
    The issue is resolved.I maintain the below missing piece of configuration.
    GRPO     IP     Credit     CENVAT clearing account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     CENVAT on hold account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 AED account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 AT1 Account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 BED account
    GRPO     IP     Debit     RG 23 ECS Account
    Sarvesh Kumar

  • VAT inclusive

    Dear All
    In case of Vat is inclusive ( But Setoff is there)  what will be the procedure in MIRO ?
    what will be the tax code ? .
    thnaks

    you mean to say in tax procedure for condition types
    JVRD , JVCD, JVRN ,JVCN, JVCS I have to assign 363 in Base type
    My Another Questation is how should  I do setup for plant not excise register & Excise duty in Inclusive in purchase order
    please provoide solution
    Thanks

  • Basic cost center question

    Hello -
    i have basic question  - why does SAP require us to assign a company code to each cost center. wont it require us to create cost centers (for the same purpose) in all the company codes?
    Since CO is management accounting - I was under the impression that cost centers are created under a controlling area and the companies are assigned to a controlling area - we could track the costs at a cost center level across the company codes...
    What am i missing?
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Assignment of controlling area and company code is made within Customizing. A controlling area can be assigned to one or more company codes.
                            A cost center must be assigned to a company code within the framework of master data maintenance, since the assignment of the controlling area to a company code is not necessarily unique. All company codes belonging to the controlling area can be assigned, in addition to being displayed with the Expanded Help function. If an empty window appears here, no company codes are assigned to the controlling area.
    Regards,
    Raj

  • Accounts rceievable analysis report with VAT inclusion

    Hi All,
    I have been asked to include the VAT amount paid by each customer in the Accounts recievable and payable analysis report.
    The problem is posting for VAT goes to General Ledger and the total amount is posted to Customer.
    The report currently in BW doesnt give the split of the amount for a customer.
    We have a cube which stores all the FI-AR line items and we have a ODS which stores GL line items.
    The GL line item ODS obiviously doesnt have customer number.
    I tried creating a multiprovider on the FI-AR cube and GL ODS but didnt get the expected result.
    Can anyone please suggest on how to approach this problem.
    Points will be rewarded..
    Thanks
    Sundar

    Update:
    Within the \config\xml\migration-config_PreMigrationAnalysis.xml configuration file you can control the buffering of records. I changed the buffer size from 15000 to 10 and now any object type with count over 10 fails on the 11th object of that type.
    Next step: Check the behaviour of the other configurations.
    <!-- List of source controller properties.-->
    <properties>
         <!-- List of Connection properties to connect to the OW instance.-->
         <property name="url" value="http://qat.idm.com"/>
         <property name="username" value="idm-config"/>
         <!-- This property specifies the location of the individual OW object reports.-->
         <property name="objectReportDirLocation" value="./reports"/>
         <!-- This property specifies the maximum number of records that shall be displayed in an individual OW object report.-->
         <property name="reportRecordsLimit" value="15"/>
         <!-- This property controls the creation of a local login to OW. Allowed Values are true/false.-->
         <property name="requireLocalSession" value="false"/>
         <!-- This property controls the buffering of OW object queries. Allowed Values are true/false.-->
         <property name="bufferQuery" value="true"/>
         <!-- This property controls the buffer size of OW object queries.-->
         <property name="bufferSize" value="10"/>
    </properties>

  • Inclusion of planned cost to the material while Invoicing

    Hi Everyone,
    We are facing a problem, kindly guide me to solve it:
    We are purchasing 'X' Material (split valuated) through a Purchase Order in which we did not provide any planned cost.
    But after GR we came to know that planned cost should also have been entered in the PO. But in the PO, while creation we did not select any planned cost line for the item. So after approval of PO and GR, we were not able to enter any planned cost.
    Now while adding up planned cost during Invoicing through MIRO, we are facing an error message:
    Error saving valuation data for material P1S002 0002
    Message no. M8829
    Diagnosis
    Error occurred when the system tried to save the valuation data.
    Please guide me how to do invoicing by including the planned cost and booking the planned cost in the material.
    Thanks and Regards
    Edited by: MP Vashishth on Jan 10, 2011 2:21 PM

    Hi,
    Thanks for your reply please.
    When i am trying to enter this freight value in the Material Tab, i am facing an error message :
    Error saving valuation data for material P1S002 0002
    Message no. M8829
    Diagnosis
    Error occurred when the system tried to save the valuation data.
    Procedure
    Contact your system administrator.
    Please guide.
    Thanks and Regards

  • Sales Order Lines with inclusive VAT prices

    I am integrating a 3rd party web site order into SAP B1. The site can only provide VAT Inclusive Prices and cannot provide the VAT rate or code - that SAP order will be loaded with the VAT rate taken from the BP / Item matrix.
    This is not a problem when creating order lines as I can use the <PriceAfterVAT> element (using DI Server). However when adding Freight Lines to the B1 order there is no equivalent element. It appears that I can only add a value excluding VAT.
    Is there any way of adding a VAT Inclusine value to a Freight Line?
    Can Freight Items be set up so that the value can be entered as Vat Inclusive?
    I would prefer not to have to caluclate and enter the VAT exlcusive price as this invovles mimicing the Web Sites VAT Matrix calculation and hoping that this mimics the SAP VAT calculation and hopefully not ending up with rounding problems. Note that the Web Site has already taken payment via credit card and the invoice from SAP must match the Web Transaction.
    Any help would be appreciated.

    Hi Nick,
    Have you considered storing the freight costs on the order as a non-stock item on the item rows rather than using the freight lines? In that way you could use the same PriceAfterVAT field to back calculate the exclusive price.
    I'd recommend you also ask your question on the application forum:
    SAP Business One Application
    as they may have other suggestions as to how you could set your tax up.
    Kind Regards,
    Owen

  • Items not subject to VAT

    I see BT have increased the net line rental for residential customers.  As an employer paying their employees bills I noticed that there was line rental charges not subject to VAT on the October bills and when I queried this I was told that BT are only allowed to charge VAT on their lowest line rental cost which is the line rental saver of £11.75/month.  Therefore the £3.70 difference between that and basic line rental is not subject to VAT.  Because these are VAT inclusive figures this effectively means an increase in net line rental cost.  Sneaky 

    http://www.thexlab.com/faqs/trash.html

  • Pricing Procedure- Handling of VAT

    Hello All
    Need help for designing IMPORT pricing procedure for a specific case (Thailand).
    Our client applies VAT - 7% on total value of the Import PO i.e. at the end.
    Their Pricing Structure is like:
    1 Basic Price
    2 Freight
    3 Insurance
    4 Custom Duty
    5 Surcharge
    6 Excise
    7 Internal Duty
    Net value = (1234567)
    and then
    8 VAT on this Net Value.i.e 7% of (1234567).
    They are paying this 7% directly to government and not to the Foregin Supplier.
    Now this VAT amount is deductable as they are having a VAT return report submitted to the government each month.
    i don't know how to handle this case..so request you all if anybody have idea please help me.
    It is vey urgent...
    Regards
    Yogesh

    Hi Yogesh,
    In our case the requirement is simple.We have defined a tax procedure for african country which only has input and out put conditions on the base amount.
    In PO, we have several conditions (header) for additional costs like freight,demurage,port charges etc and which we have defined as fright conditions.
    The accrual indicator has been ticked and so is the Vendor GR checkbox.
    The reason is that while GR, ALL THESE CONDITIONS WILL BE LOADED ON MATERIAL SO TO HAVE a LANDED COST.
    Now,the requirement in this country is that whatever they receive vide PO incurrs certain % of VAT on basic price of an item + all the additional costs(freight,demurage,port charges).
    As per the tax procedure, it calculates VAT on the BASE amount which does not consider the net price in PO.It considers gross price entered against the material.
    This is the problem.
    If I remove the accrual tick in PO pricing procedure for all the conditions for freight,port charges etc, then those conditions will get added on the basic cost of the material and thus the net price will change accordingly.VAT can then be calculated on this.
    But the problem in this is that the FREIGHT tab at the time of GR does not appear  which does not allow me to consider all these costs at the time of GR.
    I hope you understand our requirement clearly now.
    There is some additional requirement but that can be thought of later.The requirement is that the VAT will differ in % depending on the material in a PO.It means a PO can have items with different VAT %
    Thanks in advance.I hope someone must have tried out this earlier.
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    manOO

  • Excise duty inclusive

    Hi guys,
    We are facing a problem in procurement with excise duty inclusive.  The following is the scenario
    Basic rate    10,000
    bed                1,600
    ecs                    32
    secess               16
    vat                 1,456
    total            13104
    In the Purchase Order we give the rate inclusive of ex i.e 11,648 /- and at the time of MIGO, we are selecting MRP indicator tick in excise tab and entering bed, ecs and secess values here.
    Inventorisation is being done only with 10,000 rupees.  In posting of E.I. also, the ed amount is being posted properly.  But at the time of MIRO, VAT is being calculated on (11648+1648).  It should be calculated only on 11648.
    How can we resolve this?  Any help

    Dear Chintu,
    Go to OBYZ
    Select procedure
    Go to taxinn
    double click on control
    Check from and to
    If there VAT condition routine is calculate on the base of Basic price+duty then system is showing as you are seeing.
    Is you want VAT calculation on basic price ( it seems from your message)
    then you have to create new condition for VAT and give subroutine number against basic price.
    Regards
    Kedar Kulkarni

  • Additive costs

    Hi friends,
    We have an issue related to Additive Cost. some costs which have been put live in the system since go-live have used additive costs to deliver the fixed ohd into the product cost instead of the purchase order condition type and
    when conducting a cost roll up (CK40N), we were finding that we were getting 2 lots of additive cost because we have loaded new additive cost values from 1st may but we think the reason is that the we have loaded additive costs via the upload (CK74)  but they are also pulling from the purchase order condition type so we are getting two lots of cost.
    So we think the fix is that purchasing must update their condition types and we realised that the additive costs shouldn't have been loaded and we have deleted the additive costs because they never should have been loaded.
    So advise me do we need to stop to upload or any other way to stop two times cost values.
    Raju

    Freight cost is added on to the basic standard cost of materials, which is fine. Basic cost of materials comes from regular cost estimate and the freight from additive. Now when a purchase order is raised, the vendor needs to be given a purchase order only for the basic price and not the freight. The material could be brought by own transport or the vendor charging separately for freight.
    That being the assumption, the purchase order is loaded with a accrual type condition type for freight, which shall customized to create an accrual entry upon purchase. This could be meaningful to reduce/avoid the unwanted effect of distorted purchase price variance.

Maybe you are looking for

  • "iTunes Library" cannot be read because it was created by a newer version of iTunes

    Hi, I am using Leopard (OS 10.5.8) with itunes version 10.6.3 (the highest version that Leopard will run). I accessed my Leopard itunes library from another mac in my house that was running Mountain Lion and itunes 10.7. I did this so that I could us

  • Document changes place in meeting workspace

    We have a recurring events meeting workspace in SharePoint 2010. If we upload the document for some date, this document is found on that meeting events folder in document library. But after some days that document changes place and it is found in the

  • HT201412 button not working

    the sleep button on my iphone 5 is increasingly not working. sometimes have to push 7 or 8 times to turn off. screen capture no longer works and the issue is getting worse over time. have recently restored OS.

  • Adobe Reader XI install problem

    I have tried to install Adobe Reader XI on a computer, however, on shortly after the install starts I receive the error: "Setup was interrupted before Adobe Reader XI could be completely installed. Error code 150208" Anyone know more details on the e

  • Linux 11g client to solaris10 11g server

    Can you confirm that a linux 11g client can connect to a solaris 10 11g server? I'm getting some weird connectivity issues between these and would like to confirm it isn't just me and my solaris 10 patch level or some other unknown. tnsping and sqlpl