Vendor Evaluation - Price level and Price Behavior

Dear All,
In Vendor Evaluation - What's the Difference between Price level and Price Behavior.
On what basis these two will be calculated.
Thanks

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

Similar Messages

Ven Eval, Price level and price behavior.

Hello Gurus,
can anybody tell me what is difference between price level and price behavior. what is the purpose of SCOPE OF LIST and how it is works. How can i define points for scoring. basically i need detail information about vendor evaluation if anybody can help me that would be great help.
Thanks

vendor evalution
in thi swe evaluate the performance of vendor on certain factors
main facotrs are
1 price
2 qualtiy
3delivery
4 service /support
then we subdevide the main critera into sub critera like price into
1 price level
2 price history etc.
u can define maximum 20 main critera and 100 sub critera if i am not wrong
now afetr defining the critera u need to see the importance o fthe critera
lik eprice may play a more improtant role then service or then delivery
so we need to give more weight to the price the to the srvice etc.
u can achive this with the unequal weighing key 02
example
price -
3
service -
1
qualtiy --- 2
so in this case u can see that if the score of service is 20 then scorew of price will have 3 times more improtance then this
now the big question is how the system is getting the scores of criterea
there are 3 options avilable for this
1 automatic
2 semi automatic
3 manual
automatic means sytem will award the points from qualtiy module and from the purchasing value ket or rather shipping instrucion
semi auto means sytem will use the points from info record
and manulaly means u need to put the points manually at the time of evaluation

Vendor Evaluation scores sub criteria price level and price history

Dear all,
I have configured vendor evaluation with subcriteria price history and price level as automatis.
For test, I created a vendor and a material. Assigned market price for year 2009 and 2010.
Also info record price maintained for the vendor material combination.
Vendor XYZ
Material ABC
For 2009 Market price 8 and effective price 8.5
For 2010 Maket price 8.2 Effective price 8.5
Variance calculated 8.43% and score is 15. This was calculated correctly.
Now I created another material and maintained master data for that mater
Vendor XYZ
Material DEF
For 2009 Market price 18 and effective price 20
For 2010 Maket price 20 Effective price 22
Variance calculated 1% for which the score is 50.
When I go for vendor evaluation through ME61 , system is not considering the average of 2 scores. But giving a score of 50. Score bands are as follows.
5     Price behavior     5.0     10
5     Price behavior     10.0     15
5     Price behavior     20.0     20
5     Price behavior     50.0     20
5     Price behavior     99.0     10
5     Price behavior     5.0-     50
5     Price behavior     10.0-     100
5     Price behavior     50.0-     20
5     Price behavior     99.0-     10
Pls help me resolve the issue
Regards.
Milind Dugade

Hi Siva,
[Vendor Evaluation|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price Level|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
[Price History or Behaviour|http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/8d/b97db3414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm]
Reward if helpful.
Thanks and Regards,
Naveen Dasari
Edited by: Naveen Dasari on May 16, 2008 1:10 PM

Where in the icx tables are price break and price break quantities stored?

I am trying to build a query from the icx tables that will show me all the BPA line price breaks and quantities.
I cannot seem to find any documentation on what is specifically is extracted from the BPA lines when an internal catalog build is performed. I am able to validate that in iP, the price breaks are being taken into consideration when I create Requisitions with various quantities, but I do not know where iP is storing this information. Perhaps the data isn't stored and is taken from the core app po_line_locations_all table at the time the requisition is being created?
I have a BPA, line 27, that has multiple price break lines.
select rt_item_id, price_type, contract_num, contract_line_num, allow_price_override_flag, not_to_exceed_price, value_basis
from apps.icx_cat_item_prices
where contract_num = 'xxxxxx' and contract_line_num = '27'
and price_type = 'BLANKET';
All I could find when running this query was the price break information for the first price break line, none of the other price break lines.
If anybody knows where the documentation is that tells me exactly what is extracted from the core application BPA to the icx tables, I would be greatly appreciative. Even better, if someone already knows the answer to either 1) price break and quantity are not stored in icx tables or 2) they are stored and you have SQL that shows me how to find it, I would be so very appreciative to have this information.
Edited by: user6287397 on Jan 24, 2009 6:40 AM

I got the answer. :-)
Price breaks details are not stored in any icx tables. iP retrieves the information based on the need by date entered on the requisition.
Oracle support referred me to the Oracle® Purchasing Release 11i10 Open Interfaces and APIs.
The java code - SourceDocHelper.java - is responsible to get the price information by calling the procedure po_price_break_grp.get_price_break (POXPRBKB.pls DefaultPricing ) For a given a Source Document (Quotation/Catalog), Quantity and Unit of Measure, this procedure derives the best price for the calling routine.
The SQL used to get the price information that was sent to me is attached. Note that this SQL uses the need by date to get the right price in case of price break used at the distribution level.
SELECT poll.price_override
, round(poll.price_override * v_conversion_rate,
l_base_curr_ext_precision )
, poh.rate_date
, poh.rate
, poh.currency_code
, poh.rate_type
, poll.price_discount
, poll.price_override
, decode( poll.line_location_id,
null, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code,
poll.unit_meas_lookup_code)
, poll.line_location_id -- SERVICES FPJ
FROM po_headers_all poh -- FPI GA
, po_lines_all pol -- FPI GA
, po_line_locations_all poll -- FPI GA
WHERE poh.po_header_id = p_source_document_header_id
and poh.po_header_id = pol.po_header_id
and pol.line_num = p_source_document_line_num
and pol.po_line_id = poll.po_line_id
and ( p_required_currency is null
or poh.currency_code = p_required_currency )
and ( p_required_rate_type is null
or poh.rate_type = p_required_rate_type )
and nvl(poll.unit_meas_lookup_code, nvl(p_unit_of_measure,
pol.unit_meas_lookup_code))
= nvl(p_unit_of_measure, pol.unit_meas_lookup_code)
Change sysdate to l_pricing_date in order to use the Need By
Date
to determine the price.
and (trunc(nvl(l_pricing_date, trunc(sysdate))) >= trunc(poll.
start_date) -- FPJ Custom Price
OR
poll.start_date is null)
and (trunc(nvl(l_pricing_date, trunc(sysdate))) <= trunc(poll.
end_date) -- FPJ Custom Price
OR
poll.end_date is null)
--Bug #2693408: added nvl clause to quantity check
and nvl(poll.quantity, 0) <= nvl(p_in_quantity, 0)
Determining the price based on ship-to-location and
destination organization
and ((poll.ship_to_location_id = v_ship_to_location_id OR poll.
ship_to_location_id is null)
AND
(poll.ship_to_organization_id = p_destination_org_id OR poll.
ship_to_organization_id is null))
and poll.shipment_type in ('PRICE BREAK', 'QUOTATION')
-- <2721775 START>: Make sure Quotation Price Breaks are Approved.
AND ( -- ( poll.shipment_type IS NULL )
( poll.shipment_type = 'PRICE BREAK' )
OR ( ( poll.shipment_type = 'QUOTATION' )
AND ( ( poh.approval_required_flag <> 'Y' )
OR ( EXISTS ( SELECT ('Price Break is Approved')
FROM po_quotation_approvals pqa
WHERE pqa.line_location_id = poll.line_location_id
AND pqa.approval_type IN ('ALL
ORDERS', 'REQUISITIONS')
AND trunc(nvl(l_pricing_date,
sysdate)) -- FPJ Custom Price
BETWEEN
trunc(nvl(start_date_active, sysdate-1))
AND trunc(nvl(end_date
_active, sysdate+1)))))))
-- <2721775 END>
order by poll.ship_to_organization_id ASC, poll.ship_to_location_id ASC,
NVL(poll.quantity, 0) DESC,
trunc(poll.creation_date) DESC, poll.price_override ASC; /*
*/

Vendor Evaluation by Material and Material Group wise

Dear Folks,
Customer requirement is to see subcriterion level scores of Vendor
Evaluation according to material, Material group wise. But the
datasource provided by SAP is providing the data according to
Purchasing Organisation level and Vendor level (0MM_PUR_VE_01).Is it
Possible to break the scores according to material group and material
as TC in r/3: ME6B provides ranking based on Main Criterion level
scores. If possible, what is the logic?
Thanks in Advance

Hi Anil,
Thanks for ur reply.
But Customer requires vendor evaluation data through Automatic route.
0MM_PUR_VE_02 caters to semi-automatic data which needs to be configured in r/3, and customer doesn't want to do that. Is there any other solution.

Import PO Conditions, Update Price tab and price type

Dear All,
Creation of Import PO is little bit panic for users as they have to maintain minimum 10/12 condition per
line item.Also have to maintain the respective vember.My question is
1) During creation of PO condition value get copied. I want the 7 condition (JCDB,JCV1,JECV,J1CV, JECS,JSDB,JADC)
to be remain as it is and the balance freight,custom clearance,clearing charges to be wipe
out.But no such option found in "update prices" tab.Is there any setting to do such activity?
2) Can i customize "pricing type "as per the requirement?
3) Is there any way to avoid such tedious creation of Import PO?
4) There are 22 entries for price type and 12 customer reserve fields.How to use/customize these fields?
Regards
Sachin

Hi Ajit,
In import PO generally the tax part is always fix.like BCDEcessHEcess, CVDEcessHEcess, Additional Tax.But the
Insurance,Freight ,Clearing charges has to maintain as actual.So its maintain after receipt of Air way bill or Bill of Ladding.
So we want to maintain value of only tax condition at the time of creation of Import PO and balance when we were posting the planned delivery cost.Thats why we can't wipe out that condition from pricing procedure.
We want the other condition to be wipe out by customizing in Update Price button...Hope this will u...
Regards
Sachin

Vendor evaluation - General Service and support

Hi
What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
How the scores are calculated for this?\
If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
Regards
Soumen

Hi,
Following are the answers for your questions.
What are the subcriteria that can be under General Service and support?
Ans: - Subcriteria can be defined by us as per our requirement but SAP has provided following 2 Subcriteria;
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
How the scores are calculated for this?
Ans: - For above 2 subcriteria, you can assign a scoring method as following;
C Determination from quality rating of service
D Determination from timeliness rating of service
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Criteria > Here maintain subcriteria for Service criteria and assign the scoring method
At the time of processing Service Entry Sheet, under "Vendor evaln" Tab, you will have option to enter scores for the following subcriteria
- Quality of service
- Service timeliness
Once you enter scores here, it will get calculated in ME61, if automatic evaluation is configured for above 2 subcriteras
Config Path: - SPRO > MM > Puchasing > Vendor Evaluation > Define Purchasing Organization Data for Vendor Evaluation > Here for Service criteria and it's subcriteria do not activate manual maintenance indicator
If manual where can we enter the scores for these?
Ans: - And if you want to maintain values manually for Service criteria and subcriteria then activate the manual maintenance indicator in above config path and then maintain it duirng ME61 (Vendor Evaluation)

Reversal of Cost Price Update and Price Change MR21

Dear SAP experts
Recently (on 1st of this month) i did cost price update for all my FIG items. Later i realized that some of FG items cost price was not accurate. So i want to delete cost price of those items and update price by using T code MR 21
When i try to cancel these items cost price by using T code CKR1, i am getting error message that particular material current or future standard price is avialable and i am unable to move further
Please guide how to delete current cost price of these items and update cost price by using MR21. Please note these items does not have any BOM and basically are contract manufacturing items
Thanks in advance

Hi Vedsai
When you use CKR1, it does not give error.. It just gives a warning message
Enter your Plant / Mat in CKr1 and select "Current cost estimate" or "Future Cost Estimate" as the case may be
If any warning comes, ignore it and press enter.... It should reverse the cost estimate
Now update from MR21 or preferably use CK11N again
Note: If at all it gives any error in CKR1, check in T code OPR4_CK if this msg can be converted into warning message
Regards
Ajay M

Vendor evaluation - sub criteion Calculation

hi ,
Our configuration like this :
vendor evaluation with un equal weighting keys.
1.price :50
2.quality: 30
3.delivery 20
1.sub :cat
Price level        40.0 %
Price behavior 60.0 %
2. Subcriterion               Wtg.
01 On-time delivery       50.0
02 Quantity reliability    50.0
from this can you expalin in detail how system calculates scores for this sub criteion level to get overall score.
also i would like to know about ranking ,avrge variance for this.
pls guide me
thanz in adv,
Aparji.

Hi,
For this criteria
as u r weightage is 50 -50 that means eual to price level and price behavior so system directly calcutaes the % variation and accordingly puts the score for sub-criteria.
now coming to the main criterial waitage is 50-30-20 accordingly system will treat the importance of the gain points.and add it in the overall score.
for more informatio u can gothrough the following document:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_47x200/helpdata/en/8d/b985b0414511d188fc0000e8322f96/frameset.htm
regards,
sujit

MM Vendor Evaluation

Dear friends !
I have a doubt about Vendor Evaluation criteria calculation.
For example , Price
Into Price(main criteria) we have Price Level and Price history.
SAP calculate scores to price using which tables ? this criteria is accumulated by month ? or by Purchase order ?
Does anyone could help to understand the places where SAP catch data to calculate vendor scores ?I really do not understood the help.sap.com regarding this subject.
Best regards,
Ale

Hi Alessandro Brazil
Vendor Evaluation for Purchasing
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J.
Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following
weighting shares for the standard main criteria:
Main criterion     Key 01 Key 02
Price                   1      5
Quality                 1      5
Delivery                1      2
Gen. service/support    1      1
Ext. service provision 1      2
Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items
In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and
specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or
automatically.
You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the
form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose.
Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items
Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL.
An example :-
How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria
"On-Time Delivery Performance"?
The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order
(Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances.
You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor
will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the
delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as
September 15.
In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use
the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative
effect on the score for this goods receipt.
However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30)
which the vendor will actually adhere to.
The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements
into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these
are the movement types 101 and 105.
Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time,
but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage
in Customizing.
Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on
time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is
not included in the calculation of the vendors score for on-time delivery performance. So
that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not
bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score
for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in
conjunction with quantity reliability.
Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section
To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter.
If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce
high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively
low percentage variance:
The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27;
the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days.
The system calculates the percentage variance as follows:
12 / 20 x 100 = 60
If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20%
(12 / 60 x 100 = 20).
If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via
the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the
statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
Thanks

Vendor evaluation and audit management

Hi,
do you know if there is a link between the 'vendor evaluation' procedure (ME61) and the 'Audit management' (PLMD_AUDIT)?
If yes, where I can setup this link?
Thanks
xmfa4

Vendor evalution has no link to the audit management.
this is strictly for supply chain

Vendor Evaluation Delivery Subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date

Hi experts,
I have Vendor Evaluation configured for Delivery subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date. These are set to scoring method 6 and B respectively. In the Purchasing Org Data, for subcriteria Delivery, I have equal weighting set for all 4 subcriteria (on-time del, quantity reliability, shipping instr, and adher to conf date). When I run the vendor evaluation in ME61, and look at the evaluation of subcriteria, I see a score and weight for on-time delivery, and quantity reliablity. But for shipping instructions and adher to Conf Date, there is no score and the weight is 0.0. Does anyone know why there is no weight shown? I know I have to maintain the scores for shipping instr and adher to conf date but I should see weight as 25% since I set these 4 subcriteria to equal weighting. Can anyone help? Thanks!
Regards,
Julie

Hi,
As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

Vendor Evaluation- Points for Automatic criteria

Dear Team,
Our requirement for ontime delivery criteria is - for delays up to 10 days from PO delivery date to GR date 100 points, 11- 15 days delay -98 points,16-30 delay -95,31-45 delay-93,46-60 delay -90 , >60 - 1 point. how to configure this points in SPRO -points for the auto matic criteria.
Also what is the logic taken for assigning point scores for standard purchase organisation available in SAP 0001(Einkaufsorg. 0001). IF WE ARE TAKING A COPY OF THIS AND TRYING TO EDIT, SOME VALUES ARE NOT GETTING DELETED & SOME VALUES NOT GETTING SAVED.
Thanks & Regards
Nireesh

Hi,
Vendor Evaluation (t-code ME61) has the following features:
Wighting Key: in Std. SAP two keys are given (with equal weighting & unequal weighting). Based on the criteria you have, you can either accept & follow one of these std. settings or create one for yourself in IMG.
Suppose you select equal weighting as the key to be followed: there are 4 criteria viz. Price, Quality, Delivery and Service.
Each of these criteria have sub-criteria for them. For Ex. Price has 3 sub-criteria: Price level, Price history and Price behaviour.
So, for each sub-criterion, you allocate different marks (based on your business). Again, for each sub-criterion, there is a scoring method in Std. SAP. You can't create any new scoring method of your own. You only have to follow one of the 16 scoring methods given.
Thus, the total score would come to 100 and you get vendor evaluation based on these criteria chosen.
In your case: you have descending marks (points) for delay in delivery. So, pl. make one according to those criteria & sub-criteria. Please go through the help.notes and also some links in SCN. Regards, KrishnaM

Kindly suggest me regarding vendor evaluation (me63) score

Dear Friends,
I have excuted the report of vendor evaluation but here for Price criteria ( subcriteria) 40,40 are coming and some times it is 46,48 are coming. and for other criteria delivery it is 68,70 like that it is coming. kindly let me know how much is the maximum score for delivery,quality and price. and how it is distributed in standard when i have selected equal weightage
Regards,
Saurav

Dear Friend,
Kindly go through the below documents,
Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J. Weighting keys 01 and 02 are defined in the standard system. You combine the following weighting shares for the standard main criteria: Main criterion Key 01 Key 02 Price 1 5 Quality 1 5 Delivery 1 2 Gen. service/support 1 1 Ext. service provision 1 2 Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G - Double click on the line items In this step, you define the criteria by which the system computes scores for vendors and specify whether the scores for the subcriteria are computed manually, semi-automatically, or automatically. You can also store your own methods of computation for the scores for subcriteria in the form of user exits. The enhancement MM06L001 is available for this purpose. Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M - Double click on the line items Define Purchasing Organization data for vendor evaluations in transaction OMGL. An example :- How the system calculates the score for the automatic subcriteria "On-Time Delivery Performance"? The system uses the statistics-relevant delivery date in the purchase order (Items -> Delivery Schedule) and the goods receipt date to calculate date variances. You use the statistics-relevant delivery date, for example, if you know that the vendor will not deliver the material as scheduled on September 15 but on September 30. Enter the delivery date as September 30, but enter the statistics-relevant delivery date as September 15. In calculating the score for on-time delivery performance, the system will then not use the actual delivery date, but the statistics-relevant delivery date. This has a negative effect on the score for this goods receipt. However, materials planning and control uses the realistic delivery date (September 30) which the vendor will actually adhere to. The system considers only goods receipts against purchase orders and scheduling agreements into stores and the release of GR blocked stock into stores. In the standard system, these are the movement types 101 and 105. Minimum Delivery Percentage - OMGL in the On-time delivery section If you do not want a vendor to receive a very good score if he delivered the goods on time, but did not deliver the required quantity, you can maintain a minimum delivery percentage in Customizing. Assume you set the Min. del. perc. parameter to 60% and the vendor delivers the goods on time, but only 55% of the ordered quantity. Although the goods receipt is punctual, it is not included in the calculation of the vendoru2019s score for on-time delivery performance. So that the non-scoring of the on-time delivery performance criterion in this case does not bring an unfair advantage in comparison with a poor score, the vendor is awarded a low score for quantity reliability. On-time delivery performance is thus always to be seen in conjunction with quantity reliability. Standardizing Delivery Date Variance - OMGL in the On-time delivery section To rate delivery date variances in days, maintain the Std.del.time var. parameter. If you assign a lower standard value, this means that relatively low date variances produce high percentage variances. If you set a higher standard value, this results in a relatively low percentage variance: The Std.del.time var. parameter has the value 20. The goods receipt took place on Nov. 27; the statistical delivery date was Nov. 15. There is thus a difference of 12 days. The system calculates the percentage variance as follows: 12 / 20 x 100 = 60 If the Std.del.time var. parameter had the value 60, the variance would be 20% (12 / 60 x 100 = 20). If you do not maintain this parameter, the system calculates the delivery time variance via the firm zone in the case of scheduling agreements, and via the order date and the statistics-relevant delivery date in the case of purchase orders.
http://www.sap-img.com/mm009.htm

Config Smoothing factor in vendor evaluation

Dear MM experts,
Please let me know where I can config smoothing factor of score in vendor evaluation!
Thanks!

Hi,
what do you mean by smoothing factor. Normally the primary criteria used for vendor evaluation is
1. Price
2. Quality
3. Delivery norms
4. Service
based on 4 above points the evaluation is reveiwed.

Vendor Evaluation - Price level and Price Behavior

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for