Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Hi Gurus
I have a requirement wherein I have to evaluate a vendor on non stanadard Main Criterias like
1. Productivity with sub criteria as Receipt / Excepected Yield, for which I have used Scoring method 2
2.Quality Standards with Sub Criteria,- Germination (%),Genitic Purity % , Field level flags, for which i have used scoring method 7 by activating user exit- MM06L001
3.Raw Seed to Clean Seed ratio, with the same sub criteria and with the above scoring method and user exit.
The weightages given to the above three are 40 , 35 and 25 respectively.
Can you please tell me how to calculate the values for subcriterias( for example for my main criteria 2. i want to assign the weightaghes for sub criterias - Germination - 50 , Genitic Purity %- 30, & Field level flags - 20, . along with smoothin factors.
I want to automise the whole process and run the evaluation in the background.
An early reply will be very helpful to me.
thanks and regards
Ashok Kumar Pitla

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Similar Messages

Vendor Evaluation with QM - Tables

Hello
Can any one help the table information such us vendor evaluation main criteria and sub-criteria. Information stored in the audit lot , rejections and complaints etc. Please i am looking for only Vendor Evaluation with QM - related Tables information only .
Thanks for your help
Nic

T147 - Control table for vendor evaluation
T147A - Definition for main criteria
T147B - Text for main criteria
T147C - Definition for sub-criteria
T147D - Text for sub-criteria
T147E - Definition of weighting keys
T147F - Description of weighting keys
T147G - Main criteria
T147H - Interval for delivery time statistics
T147I - Definition of sub-criteria for the main criteria
T147J - Weighting keys
T147K - Assignment: Percentage X Score
T147L - Intervals for quantity reliability
T147M - Definition of scope of list
T147N - Text for scope of list
T147O - Scope of List
T027A - is the table for defining shipping instructions
T027C - specifies the points scores for compliance

Vendor Evaluation Delivery Subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date

Hi experts,
I have Vendor Evaluation configured for Delivery subcriteria Shipping Instr and Adher to Conf Date. These are set to scoring method 6 and B respectively. In the Purchasing Org Data, for subcriteria Delivery, I have equal weighting set for all 4 subcriteria (on-time del, quantity reliability, shipping instr, and adher to conf date). When I run the vendor evaluation in ME61, and look at the evaluation of subcriteria, I see a score and weight for on-time delivery, and quantity reliablity. But for shipping instructions and adher to Conf Date, there is no score and the weight is 0.0. Does anyone know why there is no weight shown? I know I have to maintain the scores for shipping instr and adher to conf date but I should see weight as 25% since I set these 4 subcriteria to equal weighting. Can anyone help? Thanks!
Regards,
Julie

Hi,
As an example its not available, nor tried self. As a common rule - if a main criteria created and sub criteria exists, when you run evaluation for main - excluding a stage of sub is not possible.
Secondly try transaction code: ME6C
Help says: Set this indicator if you only want to display those vendors that do not have
an evaluation for certain main criteria. When you click on Execute, a screen allowing you to choose one or more main criteria appears. The missing evaluations for these criteria are then listed.
here you can selection option to include/exclude evaluation.

Standard and Non-standard exports and queries issue

Hi,
We have created a few STANDARD books with standard exports in them. The standard exports use standard queries.
The ISSUE is that in the Verifications/Filters tab, where we have put in a lot of queries - ONLY the STANDARD queries show up. We would like to have all the queries show up. I am the adminsitrator and still only the standard ones show up.
I am worried that if I "Save As" the export as a non-standard export, it does not allow me to uncheck the standard tick column and save it but I have to manually change the name of the export. Can we change this in anyway?
Is there a system preference where I can allow all the queries to show up in the verifications/filter tab at least for the admnistrators if not for all? Thanks
- Ad

Thanks for your input but DRM does seem to be behaving what you said or may be I am still missing something here.
I created a standard query.
I have a standard export.
Now, in the verification/filter tab of my Standard export, I am able to see my standard queries.
But,
I am unable to see the Non-Standard Queries.
HOWEVER,
If I have a Non-Standard export --> I am able to ALL the queries. This makes it a lot more flexible in doing things.
My question is the WHY are my standard exports not able to reach the non-standard queries. What I wanted to do a twist in my export for analysis purposes for a particular use. If non-standard exports have access to Standard and Non-Standard queries --> it just makes more sense to always use a non-standard export and create non-standard queries.

Return document picking wrong main and sub transaction @ FPL9

Hi Mates,
I need a help to find out the reason why return document is referring with wrong main and sub in our current client.
Issue: when unpaid returns are posting with reference to payment document return document is posting by using main and sub transaction with previous cleared items.
Ex: 2000200 Invoice document - Main Transaction 0100 sub 0002
3000300 Payment run document - Main Transaction 0610 sub 0010
When return is posting with reference to 3000300 return document is referring 0100 and 0010, and new return document is updating with Billing and invoice text.
Usually if return document is posted that should be refere the payment document 0610 and 0010 main & sub and invoice document 2000200 should be open.
This is happening for all the main and sub cases and return document is referring with cleared items, in some cases it's posting currectly.
I have validated at return lot specific level, posting type=cancel payment.
some of business users are posted using posting type = new receiveble derived from payment.
Second case we found many issues with refeernce wrong sub, but even 1st case also system is showing same.
Kindly suggest.

Hi Bogdan,
Thanks for the reply.
When SD invoices are transferred to FICA, the system checks whether entries maintained for account determination:
1. Maintain Account Assignment Data Relevant to Transactions
2. Derive Main/Sub Transaction from SD information
3. Derive Document Type from SD Billing Document Data
Thanks,
Kumar

Determination of GL accounts from Main and Sub Transaction

Hi,
I have configured main and sub transactions with associated G/L accounts. Is there any program/table through which I can find out the assciated G/L accounts which are already configured if I pass Main and Sub transactions.

Hi Jayanta,
Please find below Path for maintaining Sub Transaction
SAP Customizing IMG -> Financial Accounting (New) -> Contract Accounts Receivable and Payable -> Basic Functions -> Postings and Documents -> Document -> Maintain Document Assignments -> Maintain Sub-Transactions
You will find the all the sub transaction for all the main transaction configured.
Or
the table "TFKTVO".
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Manish
Edited by: Manish Bisht on Jul 15, 2009 7:26 AM

PGI for both main and sub items (Sales BOM)

Hello SD friends,
I'm trying to map some BOM scenario.
Only main item should be relevant for princing.
Here's what I've done :
1. Create sales BOM via CS01
2. Maintain item category group ERLA for main item and NORM for sub item MM01
3. Maintain item category TAQ for main item and TAE for sub item VOV4
When I wanna do PGI, system creates material document only for main item.
Which means that PGI has not been done for sub items.
Is there any way to make PGI possible for both main and sub items ??
Regards,
Bahia.

Can you clear, that why you want to issue both Main item/Sub Item, where your pricing is @ main item level.
in Main item level Pricing, Main item itself includes components. Once you issue the main item. from Inventory this main item wil be reduced.
Eg: In Case of Main Item- Computer (Assume Components - Monitor , Keyboard , CPU & Mouse)
Price for Computer - $1200. Component prices individually- $300 , $100, $700, $100 - These prices applicable only when you sell as BOM at Subitem level Pricing Or Seperately )-
In SO: - Order Computer (System explodes Components to verify,which are the subitems consists in Main Item)
DEL:- Components will be copied in Delivery , but not for dispatch (Sch Line Cat:CT has these controls)
Inv: Only Main item will be displayed for print.
NOTE: for your requirement, you can change the Schline Category from CT - CN- which is relevant for delivery with movement type i601 -in SO. Then you can dispatch components & these components will not copied into Invoice ,as they are not relevant for billing.
If you want CN has to determined automatically, maintain Schline Category determination accordingly.
Hope it helps,
Any info, please revert

How to pass parameters between main and sub vi during parallel execution using the VI server technique?

Hello All,
I am working with the following example (from previous postings on this
board) that demonstrates how to run a sub vi in parallel with the main
vi. I'd like to pass parameters between the main and sub such as
the control (delay) and indicator (value) parameters of my subvi
example. Does any one know how to do this? Parallel
execution is important for me, I cannot just paste the subvi icon into
my main diagram (two nested while loops...)
Many thanks,
Luis
Message Edited by cascao on 08-16-2005 08:42 PM
Message Edited by cascao on 08-16-2005 08:42 PM
Attachments:
VI_Server_technique.vi ‏32 KB
SubVI_1.vi ‏19 KB

cascao wrote:
Hello All,
I am working with the following example (from previous postings on this
board) that demonstrates how to run a sub vi in parallel with the main
vi. I'd like to pass parameters between the main and sub such as
the control (delay) and indicator (value) parameters of my subvi
example. Does any one know how to do this? Parallel
execution is important for me, I cannot just paste the subvi icon into
my main diagram (two nested while loops...)
Many thanks,
Luis
Luis, you can use the VI Server methods 'Set Control Value' and 'Get Control Value', as demonstrated in the attached examples.
-Franz
Attachments:
VI Server.zip ‏26 KB

Main and Sub Transactions

Hi
Can anyone give me the documents for Main and Sub transactions in sap FI-CA

Hello,
1.Go to T-Code SE11.
2.Mention the table name..say 'TFKHVO'.
3.Press F7.
4.Press Ctrl+Shift + F10
5.Select the parameters..say application area 'R'
6.Press F8.
7.Press CtrlShiftF9.
8.Select radio button 'Spread sheet'
9.Download the info.
(OR )
after step 6, you can also try CtrlShiftF7.
Hope this helps
Rgds
Rajendra
Pnts!!

Can I use a PCI-1424 with a non-standard camera and build my own camera file?

I want to test a certain CCD which in non-standard and I want to setup the direct interface with it. My idea is to use a 1424 board and build the camera file.

Technically, you can build your own cable and ICD (configuration) file for your camera. It can be very difficult, though. If the CCD is fairly standard, NI might be willing to create a basic ICD file for you which you can modify to do what you want. The best way to figure out what can be done in an ICD file is to look at ICD files for other cameras.
Bruce
Bruce Ammons
Ammons Engineering

Vendor Evaluation data in tables ELBM and ELBP

Hello,
Please can someone provide some direction for this issue we have with MM Vendor Evaluation in ECC5.0.
Basically, I have set up SAP standard Vend Evaluation config for our companies Purchase Orgs in SPRO, however, tables ELBM, and ELBP are not storing any values. The config that I have maintained includes:
-     Define the weighting keys in SM30 - V_T147J : set to equal weightings
-     Define the criteria in SM30 - V_T147G: left as standard
-     Define the scope of list in SM30 - V_T147M: left as standard
-     Define Purchasing Organization data: left as standard but no Subcriterion maintained. Weightings set as equal weightings. Points scores also left as standard/
Any ideas?
Thank you.
Dave
FL,USA.

Once you do all the config than you have to use ME61 than use ME6H transaction.

Protecting Apache URLs ending in '/' with non-standard DirectoryIndex

I'm using Apache agent 2.2 for Acces Manager 7. My Apache version is 1.3.33. I have a DirectoryIndex line in my httpd.conf like so:
DirectoryIndex index.cgi index.html
So when I request the URL <http://server.edu/subdir/> I should get <http://server.edu/subdir/index.cgi>.
My problem is when URLs like this are protected by Access Manager. I have an inverted notenforced_list, which contains http://server.edu/subdir*. So only stuff in subdir should be controlled by AM. I want all 3 of these URLs to give the same results:
http://server.edu/subdir
http://server.edu/subdir/
http://server.edu/subdir/index.cgi
The first and third URLs work as expected; the second one (with a trailing '/') doesn't work. If I change my notenforced_list to read http://server.edu/subdir/*, then only the third (complete) URL works.
By looking at the agent logs in debug mode, it appears that AM is first looking at policy for http://server.edu/. That test passes, since that URL is part of the (inverted) notenforced_list.
Then the agent goes on to check the /subdir URL -- but it tacks on index.html:
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_request_url(): Returning request URL http://server.edu/subdir/index.html.
Then it goes on to say that it will enforce policy on this URL, which is correct, but it's referring to index.html, not index.cgi. I'm never prompted for authentication, I just get a browser error that says the page cannot be displayed. If I ask explicitly for http://server.edu/subdir/index.cgi, everything works as expected -- I'm redirected to the AM server and prompted to authenticate, then redirected back to the URL I originally requested.
Am I missing something here? Has anyone else tried to protect URLs ending in '/' with a non-standard name?

Here is the log extract. You can see pretty clearly that it just tacks on 'index.html' to the end of the original URL, when it gets to the 2nd phase of the policy evaluation (after checking for root-level policy). Thanks for taking a look!
2006-04-20 14:06:58.141MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_request_url(): Host: server.edu
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_request_url(): Port is 443.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_request_url(): Returning request URL https://server.edu:443/subdir/.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142 Warning 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_method_num(): Apache request method number did not match method string. Setting method number to match method string GET.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): url 'https://server.edu:443/subdir/' path_info '/'.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): processing url https://server.edu:443/.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: FqdnHandler::isValidFqdnResource() Resource => https://server.edu:443/, is valid => true
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): client_ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx not found in client ip not enforced list
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 3
2006-04-20 14:06:58.142MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 3
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 3
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 3
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 3
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: in_not_enforced_list: not enforced list is reversed, only matches will be enforced.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: in_not_enforced_list: allowing access to https://server.edu:443/
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_get_parameter_value(): Param Name = iPlanetDirectoryPro, & Param Value = NULL, status not found
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): remote user set to unauthenticated user (null)
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Info 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed()(https://server.edu:443/, GET) returning status: success.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Info 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: process_request(): Access check for URL https://server.edu:443/subdir/ returned success.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: set_user(): user set to
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_logout_url(https://server.edu:443/subdir/): normalized URL https://server.edu:443/subdir/.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.143 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: set_user_attributes(): set user attributes option set to none.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: process_access_success(): returned AM_WEB_RESULT_OK.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: process_request(): returning web result AM_WEB_RESULT_OK, data []
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_process_request(): Rendering web result AM_WEB_RESULT_OK
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_process_request(): render result function returned AM_SUCCESS.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_request_url(): Host: server.edu
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_request_url(): Port is 443.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_request_url(): Returning request URL https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Warning 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: get_method_num(): Apache request method number did not match method string. Setting method number to match method string GET.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.144 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): url 'https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html' path_info ''.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): processing url https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: FqdnHandler::isValidFqdnResource() Resource => https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html, is valid => true
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): client_ip xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx not found in client ip not enforced list
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 3
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 3
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145MaxDebug 10883:252998 AM_POLICY_SERVICE: am_policy_compare_urls(): compare usePatterns=true returned 4
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: in_not_enforced_list(https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html): matched 'https://server.edu:443/subdir/*' entry in not-enforced list
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: in_not_enforced_list: not enforced list is reversed, only matches will be enforced.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.145 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: in_not_enforced_list: enforcing access control for https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html
2006-04-20 14:06:58.146 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_get_parameter_value(): Param Name = iPlanetDirectoryPro, & Param Value = NULL, status not found
2006-04-20 14:06:58.146 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed()(https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html,GET): no sso token, setting status to invalid session.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.146 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed(): Successfully logged to remote server for GET action by user unknown user to resource https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.146 Info 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_is_access_allowed()(https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html, GET) returning status: invalid session.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.146 Info 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: process_request(): Access check for URL https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html returned invalid session.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.146MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_get_url_to_redirect(): goto URL is https://server.edu:443/subdir/index.html
2006-04-20 14:06:58.146MaxDebug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: find_active_login_server(): Trying server: https://access-manager-server.edu:443/amserver/UI/Login
2006-04-20 14:06:58.149 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: process_access_redirect(): get redirect url returned AM_SUCCESS, redirect url [https://access-manager-server.edu:443/amserver/UI/Login?goto=https%3A%2F%2Fserver.edu%3A443%2Fsubdir%2Findex.html].
2006-04-20 14:06:58.149 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: process_access_redirect(): returning web result AM_WEB_RESULT_REDIRECT.
2006-04-20 14:06:58.149 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: process_request(): returning web result AM_WEB_RESULT_REDIRECT, data [https://access-manager-server.edu:443/amserver/UI/Login?goto=https%3A%2F%2Fserver.edu%3A443%2Fsubdir%2Findex.html]
2006-04-20 14:06:58.149 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_process_request(): Rendering web result AM_WEB_RESULT_REDIRECT
2006-04-20 14:06:58.150 Debug 10883:252998 PolicyAgent: am_web_process_request(): render result function returned AM_SUCCESS.

Change vendor evaluation with new scores for automatic criteria

Hi,
I would like to delete actual vendor evaluations and revaluate my vendors with new scores for the automatic criteria on time delivery.
Using the program RMEVALDL doesn't work.
Does somebody have a suggestion please ??
Thanks in advance,
Kind regards

hi,
Points scores for automatic subcriteria: The intervals for the automatic subcriteria used must be maintained, otherwise nonsensical scores may result. In addition to the F1 documentation, you should take account of SAP Note 51054. The limit values -99.9% and 99.9% must be maintained. Similarly, the invisible limit 0 must be observed.
Variance             Score
-99.9%               1
+99.9%              100
A variance of 0% brings the vendor 100 points, whereas a variance of -1% results in a score of 1 point.
check the following link.
http://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/ERPSCM/KnowledgePaperVendor+Evaluation
http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/MMISVE/MMISVE.pdf
regards
sumit simran

Same Query for both Main and Sub Report

I have a report whichs works but I don't think i'm getting the data to both the Main Report and Sub Report in the most effcient manner... I have a report that totals users call subject counts. But then end user wishes to see all users total counts and the grand totals of call counts on the first page then then the breakdown of types of calls on subsuquent pages... so I created a report with a subreport in the report header.... I use the same query in both the sub and main report... however it asks the user to enter the parameters once for the main report and once for the sub report... Parameters are both the same for each; month and year... so it currently runs the query twice I want to run it once and use the data for both reports... I group by name and then sum the call subject counts for the user totals... and in the sub report I hide the detail section and I'm just left with the sub total line for each user, then in the main report use the same grouping and suming again and I start a new page for every user...
Using CR 9
Thanks for any advice
Vincent

i think you need to link the main report parameter with the subreport parameters inorder to pass the parameter values from main report to subreport. So right click on subreport and go to change subreport links and add parameter fields and select parameter fields from your subreport and un check the databse fields in subreport.
Regards,
Raghavendra.G

Terminal: Stored Remote Connection with non-standard Port?

Hi,
I am new to MacOS and I am amazed by the integrated terminal. However, I sometimes need to connect to servers which use a non-standard SSH port, for example, 2020. I know that I can manually connect, but for convinience, I'd like to have a saved remote connection including the non-standard port. Is this possible somehow?
Thanks,
Felicitus

I did some experimentation, using Terminal.
Terminal -> New Remote Connection -> Service -> [+]
now enter your own new service which includes
/usr/bin/ssh -p 50022
I found I had to enter a bonjour entry to get it to accept my new service, but once I did, I was able to use that new service with the custom -p 50022 port value.
Your mileage may vary. I still prefer iTerm.
Oh yea. In the future, Terminal and Unix oriented questions are better asked in the Mac OS X Technologies > Unix Forum
<http://discussions.apple.com/forum.jspa?forumID=735>

Vendor Evaluation With Non Standard Main and Sub Criteria

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for