VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO

Hi all,
We have to change de Automatic PO generated in Shipment costs for Shipment costs as delivery costs during goods receipt.
We have applied de SAP Note 427944.
. M/06
Condition type: 'B' delivery costs (T685A-KNTYP field)
Accrual: 'X' (T685A-KRUEK field)
Copy shp.costs: 'X' (T685A-BNKTK field)
. Entries in the calculation schema: (IMG -> Materials Management -> Purchasing -> Conditions -> Define Price- Determination Process -> Define Calculation Schema)
In the calculation schema, an
1. Account key (T683S-KVSL1 field)
2. Account key - accruals/provisions (Field T683S-KVSL2)
must be specified for the corresponding condition type (similar to the FRB1 condition type in schema RM0000). Note that this condition is always marked as 'statistical' in the condition screen of the purchase order regardless of the settings in the price schema because it is an accrual.
. Purchase order: The condition type should not be valuated in the purchase order item, that is, the condition value is 0.
. Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected
shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     C transferred
. In T_56 the
u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST is D Release shipment cost item
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status are only
Calculated      C Fully calculated     but in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them the status are
Calculated      C Fully calculated
Assigned        C Account assignment fully completed
Transferred     A Not transferred   and in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS
The process is :
ME21N
VL31N
VT02N (automatically)
VI01 (no PO automatically as before)
MIGO material GR for the inbound delivery of VL31N AND accounting of the delivery costs. THE ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS is missing why??
Someone can help?
Cheers
marta

Hi,
Just to clarify my questions. In the note 427944 explain that
1 . Shipment status: The overall status of the shipment cost calculation for all affected shipments must be 'C' (that is, complete).
*It means that the 3 status must be : Calculated C Fully calculated + Assigned C Account assignment fully completed + Transferred C transferred ?*
Other thing:
2 *. In T_56 the u201D Rate of Automatic Processingu201D V_TVFTK-PRZST must be D Release shipment cost item?*
3. In T_56 If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is A relevant for settlement (delivery costs) them the status showed in VI01 are only Calculated C Fully calculated b
If u201CRelevant for settlementu201D V_TVFT-ABREL is X relevant for settlement (G/L account) them in VI01 the status are Calculated C Fully calculated /Assigned C Account assignment fully completed / Transferred A Not transferred. *Why I can not do the transfer?*
as is Transferred A Not transferred them in MIGO there is no ACCOUNTING OF THE DELIVERY COSTS.
Could you help me with one of these three questions?
Thank you very much,
marta

Similar Messages

Delivery Cost in MIGO of Service PO

Hi,
User has created service PO with the freight condition. He created the service entry sheet against the PO. so for each service entry sheet in PO history delivery cost quantity generated. now he did the MIRO for delivery cost using the full delivery cost quantity with less amount. now he want to do the miro of remaining freight amount but system in not allow to do the miro.
Please suggest the solution so user can post the miro for remaining amount.

If you want Hit to freight clearing account, You can make Credit memo to freight venodor with reference of Purchase order.
If your Goods provider & Transport vendor is same, You can post the Freight charge in Details tab----Unplanned deliver cost while posting Miro.
Before that, Check The Freight clearing G/L account is availble in system. if not, Please concern with FI consultant.
Thanks & regrads
Nitesh

How to return Delivery Costs in a PO?

Hi everyone,
My client has a scenario of vendor return with PO, where we indicate that the PO item is a return item.
The situation I am facing is the following: we create a normal PO, where items have their price + delivery costs. MIGO and MIRO are done perfectly. My problem comes when we have to create a return PO for that item. I do not have the same provision for PO returns, because when we return the item through PO indicator delivery costs can not be included as SAP does not support negative delivery costs. The thing is that returning the item at Purchase Price without consideration of the deliver costs, will result in high WAC. How to resolve this issue.
Could anyone advise on this? Thanks in advance!
Nisha

Hi Nisha,
I have run the scenerio in my test system with return PO.
In this I have considered the net price to be 10 rs out of which .50 rs is frieght (condition type is marked with accrual/statstical in config)
i was able to create PO since the condition type value is coming in positive and its statastical and on doing mIGO system created the material document with the below accounting entries
GR/IR dr for 10 Rs
Stock account credit for 9.5 rs
Frieght account credit for .5 rs
I think this solves the issue
please check the config of the frieght condition type make it statastical

Delivery costs in PO

Hi,
Delivery costs wrongly entered in PO and MIGO made.
But after founding the correct delivery costs,the MIGO was cancelled for the PO.
But when try to enter the new delivery costs,system not allowing to enter the new delivery costs.
How to go with this?
Regards

Hi
Flag the item for deletion & create a new item & proceed further.
As delivery costs cannot be changed once the Purcahse order history is created.
Thanks & Regards
Kishore

Error during MIGO-Error during maint. of delivery costs in master condition

Hi
We are getting error as below during MIGO against a PO with doc type NB:
"Error during maint. of delivery costs in master conditions, Delivery cost conditions in different validity periods not identical"
What might be cause??
Thanks
Maruthi

Check the delivery conditions in condition tab of PO.
Try to check if there are any delivery condition records mainatined.
I think the problem is mostly due to overlapping validity period. Try to change the validity period for the same.

Not to Post Planned Delivery Cost in IV before MIGO

Dear Experts,
We are maintaining the Delivery cost Condition values for different vendors in Purchase Order and we are selecting the GR Based IV check box. At the time of MIRO before making MIGO (Goods receipt) it will not allow to Post Incoming Invoice if I select Goods/Service items or both Goods/Service items & Planned Delivery Cost but it will allow if we select only Planned Delivery Cost to Post.
Kindly suggest us if anybody have the solution to restrict to Post the Planned Delivery cost before posting the Goods Receipt (MIGO).
Thanks & regards,
Dhanu

Dear,
First u do the MIGO, After that post the Material IV with goods/service, after that u again do IV for planned delivery cost selection of Planned delivery cost.
Thanks,
If this is helpful for u then reward me.

Migo unplanned delivery cost

Hi all,
Can I put delivery cost to separate account or G/L account during MIGO?
What are the configuratiosn for this .
Regards
Sanjay

Hii Sanjay,
In MIGO you cannot post any account posting manually.
If the delivery cost is planned then we can put at PO document it self.
Else if your delivery cost is unplanned, but if you want to add at MIGO it is not possiable, but it can be done at MIRO document, where you can directly post to saperate GL Account else you can distribute the cost to stock account.
Thanks,
Regards,
Muralidharan

Planned delivery cost at PO header

Hello,
I have the following requirement:-
1. There should be a freight condition at PO header level for delivery costs. Freight vendor is different from PO vendor.
2. Even if there is partial GR, delievry cost must be paid in full.
Say PO is for 100 PC and delivery cost is 100 INR. Now at MIGO if the delivered quantity is 75, the freight vendor must still be paid 100 INR.
Issue 1 can be resolved easily by copying FRB* condtiton type and marking it for header level.
I am stuck with how to resolve issue 2. I am unable to make the system post full freight condtion at MIGO for partial GR.
I have thought of the following approach:-
User does normal MIGO for partial GR and at MIRO posts the difference freight invoice amount as unplanned delivery cost. Also how best to treat subsequent delivery cost for 25 PC - as a unplanned delivery cost?.
Material vendor gets invoiced in the normal way.
Is there any setting to make the system post full freight condition (header or item) amount even for partial GR? If not how best to treat this scenario and for subsequent invoice for remaining PO amount.
Waiting for your valuable suggestions.
Thanks,
Saurav.

Hi
If you are aware of the no of goods receipts and the cost of freight per Gr then you can enter this amount at the Po header before the GR. The advantage is that the total freight cost will be divided across all complete Po quantity.
Thanks
Ganapathy Subramanian.N

Total Delivery Cost for partial Item delivery

Hi Guru,
I have a requirement wherein I have to apply the total delivery cost for partial Item delivery.
For example: Even if there is partial GR, delievery cost must be paid in full.
Say PO is for 100 PC and delivery cost is 100 EUR. Now at MIGO if the delivered quantity is 60, the freight vendor must still be paid 100 EUR.
Is this possible by configuration or do we need to make any changes at code level? If yes, Please guide me on how to do that....

Create a PO without tick GR-Bsd IV, suppose I have created PO with qty 20 and rate 1 INR and give freight 50 INR (Fixed Amount)..
Then I have done partial GR for qty 5. My freight amount booked as 12.5 INR (for partial GR)
Then I have gone for MIRO..
Here select Goos/Service item + Planned delivery cost.
Enter the PO, you can see two line items appear..
One for goods and one for freight...
Goods will come as qty 5 and amount 5 INR and Freight will come as qty 5 and amount 12.5 INR.
Just change the freight qty and amount as 20 and 50 INR.
Then post the MIRO, you can see your total freight will be booked to vendor..
Now again do GR for qty 2, at that time your freight amount will booked as 5 INR.
Then when you will go for MIRO, you can see only the GR item, Freight qty and amount will not come at the time MIRO..
(Note : I have told the scenario as per my previous screen shot)

Conditions type of category "Delivery Costs"(B) donu00B4t allow negative values

Hello,
I would like to know if it is possible to munipulate a condition type with category "B" Delivery costs in such a way that it allows a negative entry in the Purchase Order.
Estandard SAP does not allow it. Message: 06259 "Negative Delivery costs are not allowed".
If the above is not possible, can anyone tell me how a can manipulate a Discount (fixed amount) in such a way that it not only points at a particlar account (accruels indicator does this job) upon MIGO, but also apears as a line-item upon receiving the invoice (MIRO). As far as I know, only Planned delivery costs can do this job. But they do not allow negative values!
If anyone has encountered a similar task, please tell me how they solved it.
Thanks,
Aart

Hello Guys,
The scenario isas follows.
When one buys fuel, in Chile one has to pay fuel especific Taxes.
Version especific config does not resolve this because we need the tax in amount (value) not in percentage.
In our system we resolved this by creating a material "Fuel especific Taxes" which points at a tax-account with a special tax-indicator.
So far so good.
Now the government implemented a second fuel tax - "Fuel tax variable" which we might resolve in the same way, but the problem is this tax might be negative(!).
We cannot create a material with a "negative value" in our Purchase Order and discount conditions have inmediate efect on the material costs in the PO.
The ideal would be incorporate a condition type in the PO which upon invoicing (MIRO) shows up with the tax account (and a possible negative value!
The model we have developed upto now is using the tabpage "GeneralAccount" in the MIRO but in this model we have to indicate the account ourselves. The system does not propose it.
Thats why I thought of the "Planned Delivery costs" option.
Hope this clarifies a bit more the case we have.
Thanks for any feedback
Aart

Delivery costs with no material

Hi gurus:
I have a situation, i need to create a PO with Account assignment category "K" and with no material, only text description, and I put de G/L account number and cost Center. I want to calculate the delivery cost but in the transaction MIGO there is not values.
I already have inbound delivery, shipment and shipment cost.
My question is: is possible to generate delivery costs if in the purchase order don't have the material?
I tried using a material type NLAG and in this situation the delivery costs are calculated.
please help me...
Regards....

Hi
I think that you have had your question answered so if you are happy with this can you please award points if you want to but mainly can you please mark your question as answered so that it is easier to navigate around the open questions in the forum as the number of pages are growing and growing and it takes too long to go through everything especially if a satisfactory answer has already been given and people like me who want to help will give up and so some people may not get any help.
Thanks for this
Frenchy.

Delivery costs not reversed in GR reversal

Hi,
I have a situation where in PO following conditions are used-
ZR0 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type
ZR2 - (100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - Delivery cost - (100% of ZR0)
ZR3 - (-100) USD - Statistical - Accrual - Discount/Surcharge type - (-100% of ZR0)
When I post the GR, the following entries are posted-
148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   30,421.60 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68- AUD
629935    Std-Actual Price Var   34,570.08 AUD
611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68 AUD
611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68- AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR0)
120240    CARecv Sundry-Extern   14,504.64 AUD
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64 AUD (ZR2)
311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   14,504.64- AUD (ZR3)
But when I reverse the GR, the following entries only are posted-
99 148000    CAInv NonTradStock S   32,653.56- AUD
86 311700    CLPbls GR-IR Clearin   64,991.68 AUD
96 629935    Std-Actual Price Var   32,338.12- AUD
50 611900    Purchasing (FG)        64,991.68- AUD
40 611910    Purchase offset (FG)   64,991.68 AUD
Can you please let me know why the ZR0/ZR2/ZR3 cond are not reversed in the 102 movement?

Hello Jurgen,
I am cancelling the initial material document (101) with MIGO - 102.
When I check the accounting documents:
For the 101:
001 89       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00
002 96       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81-
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             548.57
004 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00-
005 50       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                               893.76-
For the 102:
Itm PK BusA Acct no.   Description                    Tx     Amount in   USD
001 99       311010     STK RAW MAT                                   18,219.00-
002 86       408111     UNVOUCH A/P RAW MAT                           11,489.81
003 86       601120     PURCHASES RAW MAT (O                             345.19
004 40       408113     UNVOUCH A/P TRANSP                             6,384.00
There were several goods receipts between 101 and 102 (but no invoicing) because this is an automated flow with EDI.
The PO has 2 freight condition types:
FRC1 (freight/qty) with vendor A in the details of the conditions on the PO
FRA3 (freight %) with vendor B in the details of the conditions on the PO
For different reasons, the pricing is maintained in MEK1 (not in an info-record).
Thanks for your help,
Annabelle R.

Shipment costs to appear as delivery costs in Purchase

Hi,
we want the shipment costs to appear on the purchase order.
I have followed the sequence as below
Created a purchase order
Created a delivery VL31N
Created a shipment VT01N
Created a shipment cost document VI01
I have goods receipt using VL32N, but the shipment cost did not appear in Purchase Order.
in configuration i have created a new condition in Purchasing ZFRB which has copy shipment cost slected, and added this to the purchasing schema.
for the shipment cost item category, i configured the settement to delivery costs and left the generate PO blank.
i would be grateful if someone could help me with configuration that i've missed,
thanks in advance
Shadaab

Please read OSS note 427944 and check SAP online help:
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_04/helpdata/EN/83/218ad1068a11d2bf5d0000e8a7386f/frameset.htm
Prerequisites
To add shipment costs to delivery costs in the incoming shipments, you need the following settings in Customizing:
Shipment cost item categories
Under the Shipment cost types and item categories activity, set the Relevant for costing field to A = Relevant for calculating delivery costs (Delivery costs). This results in the shipment costs not being transferred directly into accounting. The accounting is done via the purchasing functionality for delivery costs.
Conditions in the purchase order
Under the Define condition types activity, set the Condition type field to B = Delivery costs. In addition, select the Transfer shipment costs field. The system only shows this field, if you have chosen delivery costs as condition type. In the purchase order, you have to enter the condition type in the item category section. However, you do not enter a value since this value will be determined by the shipment cost document and will then be automatically transferred to the goods receipt document.
Goods receipt
To find the relevant shipment cost documents, you must know the corresponding inbound deliveries. Therefore for incoming goods this must relate to confirmation-related goods receipts. Under the Set up confirmation control activity, select the GR-relevant and GR assignment fields for the appropriate confirmation control key (which is then entered in the purchase order).
Regards,
Csaba

Purchase Order Delivery Cost

Hi all,
when i created PO and enter freight value,at the point of entering migo an error message "Balance not zero: 99,749.85- debit: 34,197,149.85 credit: 34,296,899.70"
was displayed ,Please how can i resolve this issue.

Hi
when i created PO and enter freight value,at the point of entering migo an error message
can explain in which tab you enter fright value? befor posting migo ,how you simulte it
I think its Miro trasnction,If you value is plant delivery cost then choose deliver+plant delivery cost in miro layout
or Its unplanned then enter in details tab in unplanned field
Regards
Kailas Ugale

Query-Unplanned delivery cost

Dear All,
This is regarding Unplanned delivery Cost:
I make an PO of a Material of 15000 Qty in which PO Value is calculated excluding Freight charges .
But while doing GRN I comes to Know the Freight charges. Let us say 500 Rs but this is for 10000 Quantity (Here the vendor is different (Transporter)).whereas 5000 Qty will come later on.
So i have configured that during GRN Vendor can be changed. or for this USer will Go into Change PO mode and will put the freight charges as 500
But this freight charges is distributed on 15000 quantity whereas actually i want that this freight charges can be uploaded on 10000 Quantity.
How it can be handled ?
Whereas when next time when i receive remaining (5000 Quantity) at that time freight is 200 Rs (For eg)
How it will be uploaded on 5000 quantity.
Can it be possible that i ask the user to put 1 Rs as nominal value in FRB1 for (transporter as Vendor)
And after doing MIGO out of this 1 Rs proportanately distribute this value on 10000 qty (lets say 0.75 Rs )
And while doing MIRO I select the PO no and Planned deliver cost where in it will show quantity as
10000 and freight value as 0.75 (Here i will put the actual Freight) But in this case if i put the actual freight it gets uploaded on Freight G/L.
Is it possible that the freight gets uploaded on Items which i am purchasing?
If i dont put the actual value instead of 0.75 and instead of that can i put this value in Unplanned delivery cost. But i think if i put the Unplanned delivery cost as 500 Rs ,system is showing me only the Credit amount of Rs 500 on Vendor and on freight acct as 0.75
i.e Transporter is getting credited by 500 Rs
and only Freight acct is getting debited by 0.75
balance 499.25 Rs it is not showing at all.
CAN U PLZ GUIDE ME ON THIS ????
REgards
Shailesh

Hi,
Why dont u put the charges directly in MIRO rather than modifying the PO. This way u can distribute ur charges as per quantity
Thanks,
Sourabh

VI01 as delivery costs in MIGO

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for