WBS Status change from Good Receipt

Hi All,
Is there any way I can control the WBS System status at the time of creating good receipt. Any BAPI, BADI or useexit would help.
Thanks
MKR

Hi,
Could you elaborate your query?
Do you want to control or restrict system status of WBSE while doing GR?
Regards,

Similar Messages

Status change from 'Completed' to 'In Process' not allowed

When configuring Appraisals in R/3 we want to change the Status of 'Completed' when pressing the 'Reject' button so that it moves to the Target Status of 'In Process'
However, we are getting an error message:
Status change from 'Completed' to 'In Process' not allowed
The SAP help states the following:
In Process (only if final appraisal or part appraisal is defined)
This has been defined at Template Level.
So I don't understand why we are getting the message.
Does any one else know of a way to configure the Appraisal template so that after it has been 'Rejected' it moves back into 'In Process'
Thanks
MN
Points Rewards!

Hello Andreas,
Ah, sorry, there was so much talk about user decisions that I assumed you were using a standard decision task.
Still, I would be extra careful of changing the way workflow usually works because you have an unknown target audience that are based on the standard.
The standard SAP philosophy is quite simple: cancel/F3 or do nothing and it stays reserved. If you do not want it reserved, you need to perform an action. This is based on a majority of processes: in most cases when you execute a work item you will also be the one who is going to completed it. Replacing it is the lesser used of the two alternatives, therefore it is the only one that requires an action on the part of the user.
Again, this is intended as constructive input. Strange quirks and unusual behaviour tend to add a black mark to software if they do not make things easier to use. In many environments users are not even aware of the reserve/replace business, so there you would be adding an additional layer of complexity.
Personally I would find an exit popup annoying as a regular workflow user - regular decisions can be approved with one click, or I can back out with a single click if I need to make a phone call or look up some info before approving - but with this new-fangled thing I've got an extra button to click and an extra thing to think about. This is especially the case in a payment approval scenario where you may have users in some departments who may approve hundreds of payments each week.
My suggestion would be to leave it like that. By all means put an option into the user decision to put it back or to 'un-reserve' it (and loop round if the user chooses it). That way you are adding value and not clicks.
Cheers,
Mike

Error copying data from Goods Receipt PO to A/P Invoice

Hi all, this seems like it should be a simple process. We get an error doing the following:
- Open a blank A/P Invoice
- Select the Vendor
- Copy from Goods Receipt PO
- Choose the items
- Draw Document Wizard 'finish'
The process aborts, and the system message that comes up is:
'Business partner of copied down payment document must be the same as business partner of target document'
Why is it saying this when it is the system that is choosing and presenting the items on the Goods Receipt PO that are associated with the Vendor??
BTW: version 8.8 running on MS SQL Server 2008

Yes, the message is clear, but the logic is not.
A blank A/P invoice is opened, and the business partner (Vendor) is selected. When the 'copy from' Goods Receipt PO is selected, a list of POs is displayed that are associated with the vendor. This info should then be copied back - there is no ability to select a differend business partner, and it is SAP that is making the association between the data. This is what is confusing. If A/P Down Payment Invoice is selected for this process (rather than the A/P Invoice), the system copies that data across with no error message.
Note: This is only a new system and the users are getting used to the SAP way of doing things. Could it be that they should be carrying out the workflow in a different way?
Cheers,
Nick

Error "Status change from READY to COMMITTED is not allowed"

Dear experts,
once again SAPs workflow environment drives me crazy with mysterious error messages.
Some time ago I posted a question here concerning the problem that I cannot put back a workitem by using function module SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM due to a lock on this workitem which has been set right after it has been double clicked in the business workplace workflow inbox:
[How can I put back a workitem before I'm back in the business workplace?;
Since I do not want to dequeue the lock for the workitem in my application (where the user finds the appropriate detail information along with the function buttons for approval, rejection and F3/BACK) I tried it with calling a POPUP_TO_CONFIRM ("Do you want to put back the workitem?") directly from within the BO-method, right after returning from the FM that called my application. From here (the popup then shows in front of the business workplace instead of the application) the locking doesn't seem to be a problem any more! But whatever I do after the users decision to put the WI back - calling the FM SAP_WAPI_PUT_BACK_WORKITEM or trying to leave the method with macro EXIT_CANCELLED - leads to the error message "Status change from READY to COMMITTED is not allowed" and the workitem changes to status ERROR, too. This message seems to be bull***t, since the status of the item is supposed to go back to READY.
Does anybody have experience to help me on that ?
Thanks in advance
regards
Andreas

Hello Andreas,
Ah, sorry, there was so much talk about user decisions that I assumed you were using a standard decision task.
Still, I would be extra careful of changing the way workflow usually works because you have an unknown target audience that are based on the standard.
The standard SAP philosophy is quite simple: cancel/F3 or do nothing and it stays reserved. If you do not want it reserved, you need to perform an action. This is based on a majority of processes: in most cases when you execute a work item you will also be the one who is going to completed it. Replacing it is the lesser used of the two alternatives, therefore it is the only one that requires an action on the part of the user.
Again, this is intended as constructive input. Strange quirks and unusual behaviour tend to add a black mark to software if they do not make things easier to use. In many environments users are not even aware of the reserve/replace business, so there you would be adding an additional layer of complexity.
Personally I would find an exit popup annoying as a regular workflow user - regular decisions can be approved with one click, or I can back out with a single click if I need to make a phone call or look up some info before approving - but with this new-fangled thing I've got an extra button to click and an extra thing to think about. This is especially the case in a payment approval scenario where you may have users in some departments who may approve hundreds of payments each week.
My suggestion would be to leave it like that. By all means put an option into the user decision to put it back or to 'un-reserve' it (and loop round if the user chooses it). That way you are adding value and not clicks.
Cheers,
Mike

Prevent PO item from beeing changed after goods receipt or invoice receipt

Hi all,
Users had the good idea to change the description of the goods to be purchased, after a partial goods entry was already posted. Now they complain that what they get is not what they ordered (...)
Is it possible to prevent a PO item line from beeing changed with ME22N, after e.g. a partial goods receipt has been posted, or the MIRO posting has been done?
Thanks for information!

Kurt,
Standard SAP doesnt restrict you to PO changes when subsequent documents are posted.
You can have a Customer Exit to check in MSEG Table if any subsequent document exists for the PO entered in the PO number field. the exit could be used to check PO if MIRO/ MIGO have been posted or not.
Also define error messages if the documents are posted, user should get error message.
Raghavan

The total goods movement status not changed after goods receipt using MIGO

Dear gurus:
when i use T-code MIGO doing goods-receipt against Inbound delivery, the total goods movement status don't changed. i tryed VL32N to do goods receipt, and the status changed.
how can i do to make the status change when i receive goods in MIGO against inbound delivery?
best wishes,
David

Hi,
If your MM is integrated with WM (SU mgt or HUM) you have to post the GR with Inbound delivery.
Amit

VPRS in COPA coresponding to value from goods receipt

Hi,
I'm having the following scenario:
1. Goods receipt from production for finish goods at standard price P1;
2. Calculation and change of standard price to P2;
3. Period end closing in CO - variances and settlement to COPA - variances are calculated related to P1;
4. Goods issue and invoice - VPRS is P2
I need to know if it is possible to have at the moment of invoice on VPRS the price from the goods receipt. And how can I do that?

Hi Ajay sir.....
Correct me if I am wrong, Zara is not saying VPRS value is not the same as PGI. Zara's concern is GR is happening with P1 standard price and PGI is happening with P2 (new cost estimate). Zara wants to have PGI also with the P1 cost estimate. (ultimate aim is to have VPRS value to be picked from GR, i.e. P1 cost estimate ----- in this case)
Whatever the 1st answer given by you is the ideal one, but Zara's concern is if she uses the previous cost estimate, for this scenario it matches, but if GR and PGI happens in the same period (i.e. current period) there will be a problem, system considers the previous cost estimate instead of current.
@ ZARA:
I hope my understanding is right, if not excuse me for misunderstanding.
And I hope this is the standard behavior....
Regards....
Jose

No. of containers not updating in QALS table from goods receipt

Hi all,
I am working on below requirement for client.
I am releasing a process order and then saving it. With this, an inspection lot is created in QALS table automatically.
Then I am doing Goods receipt through MIGO.
While doing goods receipt, I am entering no. of containers in quantity tab on item level (GOITEM-ANZGEB), but the same is not getting updated in QALS table (QALS-ANZGEB).
Is there any configuration setting needs to be done to activate the update of no. of containers in QALS table from MIGO transaction?
P.S. - Sometimes we use MB31 also to do goods receipt. In that also, there is no. of containers field.
Thanks in advance,
Sachin

Hi Sachin,
what is the solution for this .? Can you explain?
Ram

Table for WBS status change with date

Hi,
Please assist me with a table name which should have WBS status with date on which statis was changed.
Thanks,
Manish.

Hi
You can use program (SE38) RBSVCDOC to track these changes. Else go manually in CJ20N to track these status changes.
Use JCDS and JEST table for any other reporting on it.
*Kindly mark your thread once your query is resolved.*
Regards
Saurabh

PO Price Change after Goods receipt

What is the config settings for not allowing the price(Net price) change at item level in Purchase order after the GR or partial GR is made.
Thanks

Hello,
Unfortunately, this cannot be avoided. It is possible to change the net order price in a PO item after the GR has been posted.
What you cannot do is add new delivery costs. This is forbidden with an error message.
In the customizing transaction OMF4 you can disallow the changes for the net price setting it as a "display" field only for the field selection groups ME22 and ME22N. Please, take into account that AKTV, NBF, PT0F will also be checked (or other entries depending on your specific document type and item category).
Unfortunately, this will affect the "net price" in the transactions ME22 and ME22N all the times (this is, the field will be a "display only" field always; it will not allow changes, independently of whether you have posted the goods receipt or not).
I hope this helps!
Esther.

Create serial number - asset from goods receipt

Hi,
We configured the sync functionality between PM and AA, so when we create a serial number via transaction IQ01, the fixed asset master data is created automatically. We also configured the serial number profile in the material master. When we create a goods receipt (MIGO) the serial number data screen comes into place. We save the GR document, and when we check the serial number data in PM this info is correct, but the synchronization between fixed asset didn't work it means, no asset master data is created. Is there some missing configuration? Even the tcode IQ01 works fine, why in this operation (MIGO) the configuration doesn't work ?
Any help on this topic we'll be very appreciated.
Lee

Hi,
in customizing transaction OIS2 I'm using the serial number profile 0010 (Stock check) and in the serializing procedure Goods Receipt and Issue Doc (MMSL), the serialization usage is 03 and the equipment requirement is 02 (always with equipment). When use MIGO for goods receipt I noticed that after the serial number creation (via tcode IQ03) some serial number mandatory fields have no value, like Company Code (BUKRS) and Cost Center (KOSTL), and other mandatory fields for the master records. If I modify the serial number (tcode IQ02) and complete the mandatory fields, the synchronization work fine since the asset master record is created. I'm suspecting that some of these fields (like company code) are necessary for the asset creation. I checked the whole PM/AA/MM configuration for these fields to in some way, assign them the corresponding value taken from the goods receipt or material and give it to the serial number record for creation. If you know something else please let me know.
Thanks for your response.
J.R.Lee

Create serial number - asset from goods receipt (MIGO)

Hi,
We configured the sync functionality between PM and AA, so when we create a serial number via transaction IQ01, the fixed asset master data is created automatically. We also configured the serial number profile in the material master. When we create a goods receipt (MIGO) the serial number data screen comes into place. We save the GR document, and when we check the serial number data in PM this info is correct, but the synchronization between fixed asset didn't work it means, no asset master data is created. Is there some missing configuration? Even the tcode IQ01 works fine, why in this operation (MIGO) the configuration doesn't work ?
Any help on this topic we'll be very appreciated.
Lee

Hi,
in customizing transaction OIS2 I'm using the serial number profile 0010 (Stock check) and in the serializing procedure Goods Receipt and Issue Doc (MMSL), the serialization usage is 03 and the equipment requirement is 02 (always with equipment). When use MIGO for goods receipt I noticed that after the serial number creation (via tcode IQ03) some serial number mandatory fields have no value, like Company Code (BUKRS) and Cost Center (KOSTL), and other mandatory fields for the master records. If I modify the serial number (tcode IQ02) and complete the mandatory fields, the synchronization work fine since the asset master record is created. I'm suspecting that some of these fields (like company code) are necessary for the asset creation. I checked the whole PM/AA/MM configuration for these fields to in some way, assign them the corresponding value taken from the goods receipt or material and give it to the serial number record for creation. If you know something else please let me know.
Thanks for your response.
J.R.Lee

Copy from Goods Receipt Problem

Hi Experts
My user is creating AP Invoice , first he selects vender and then when he press button COPY FROM and he chooses Goods Receipt PO system does not show any Goods Receipt PO, but there are so many Goods Receipt PO on the system for this vender, please help what can be the reason, i have given full authorization of GRN to this user but still not showing when he select copy from
Regards
Ashar Anwer

Hi!
Ensure you are selected ITEM type in AP Invoice. There are 2 types of document we can raise in SAP ITEM or SERVICE. Your Goods Receipt PO will be of ITEM type so, you hv to select the same type in AP Invoice bfr saying Copy From.
Get back if u hv any doubt.

Negative Invoice from Good Receipt Quantity.

I have an invoice with negative quantity due to the system is taken the negative quantity in the good receipt. In the control copy I have the Billing quantity E in order to bill the quantity from the good receipt however if there is a cancellation in the good receipt the system takes the negative value and the final invoice is negative. I would like to know if there is any solution in order to avoid this billing.
Thank you and best regards.

Hello,
Please check the billing relevance of the item category used in this business process. Run this scenario once again by making this billing relevance as "B". Please update your post.
Regards,
Sarthak

Cancel line item from goods receipt issue

Wanted to get some information on how to cancel a line item from a goods receipt and still have the item available on the PO. Is there a mechanism that allows the line item to be reopened in the PO or possiby be edited or reversed? According to the road map, this will be an implemented feature, however if i go to the greyed outline line item, I cannot cancel or edit.

Hi..............
Welcome to SAP Business One Forum...........
In SAP 8.81 you can reopen Purchase Order Line Item by returning the Item received through GRPO........
But in SAP 8.8 this facility is not available. You have to simply make a return based on GRPO.........
Regards,
Rahul

WBS Status change from Good Receipt

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for