WCS Busiest Client Report Problem

We are using Wism 4.0.155.5 and WCS 4.0.81.0. Everytime I run "busiest client report" on WCS, I get some clients with throughput more than 70Mbps and utilization more than 600%!!! It is very weird. Anyone see this as well? Thanks.

zhenningx:
I see it too. It definitely appears to be a bug, but I will do some checking. Mine show upwards of 2000% and most of my top 25 show an almost identical tx/tx amount of 4gb.
If I make any headway with TAC, I'll let you know.

Similar Messages

WCS Unique Client report problem

If I run a "Unique Client" report in WCS (based on 4 controllers) using the range "last 1 day", I get plenty of data. But if I choose a specific range of time, even within the last 24 hours, I don't get any data. Seems like a bug. Anyone else experience this issue?
It's WCS 7.0.172

Seems you are facing below bug and needs a patch uniqueclients.xml which can be provided by TAC.CSCtq64813
Apply the workaround which done by the following steps: 1. Stop WCS 2. cd to /webnms/classes/com/cisco/server/reports/conf 3. Backup UniqueClients.xml 4. Copy the attached file to UniqueClients.xml (batch file attached in the case) 5. Restart the server

"Busiest Clients" report template on Cisco Prime & Aironet 1242AG

Yesterday I was trying to schedule a "Busiest Clients" report on our Cisco Prime physical appliance (PRIME-NCS-APL-K9, v2.1.0.0.87).
My goal was to monitor the busiest clients on a couple of old Aironet access-points. These APs have been installed in a branch office of our university that rely on 4 Mb/s SHDSL WAN connectivity and, as you might imagine, some saturation occurs when the classrooms are crowded.
Unfortunately, all the reports were empty ... there was only a "No data matches the specified criteria for the report” warning inside.
The Client Statistics task (Administration>Background Tasks) was enabled and I was able to run this report selecting a different floor area ... after a few tries I've discovered that this error occurs only when the old Aironet 1242AG APs are involved. If I select a floor area populated with the newer 1142 and 2602 models, the report template works as intended.
So, is there a way to fill a "Busiest Clients" report with data fetched from our old Aironet 1242AG APs?
Our WLC is a Cisco Wireless Services Module 2 Controller for Cisco Catalyst 6500 (WS-SVC-WISM2-K9).
(Sorry ... my English is a bit rusty)

Hi,
Kindly try to restart the Dameon manager with the command line of the server
1> net stop crmdmgtd
and then start the daemon manager --> net start crmdmgtd (wait for atleast 20-25 minutes before login back to LMS and also see if any file do exist at location CSCOps\Objects\dmgtd\ready folder).
Get the output of pdshow after waiting for 20 minutes and stdout.log and stderr.log from CSCOpx\MDC\tomcat\logs.
Many Thanks,
Gaganjeet

Detailed client Report in WCS

Hi,
what exactly mean the fields of the traps that appear in the Detailed Client report of the WCS?
07/08/10 08:09,"00:04:23:71:67:bf",,"Campus> Ome > CN.OM.P03","XSFK2MP345","10.120.205.25",07/08/10 08:09,"0 secs","0.0.0.0",0,-128,"802.11b","N/A",0,0,0,0,"No","Associated","Client '00:04:23:71:67:bf' is associated with AP '00:23:eb:2d:8a:e0', interface '0'."
which means many associations of "0Sec" with no IP assigned?
Thanks!

Hi,
Are you still facing this issue?
thanks,
Vinay

WCS: Bug with unique client report?

I'm running WCS 7.0.172.0 and have run into the situation where a Unique Client Report, when run for the last day, shows lots of clients (properly). When you select a specific date range, you get no records, regardless of the date range (you can even select the last 24 hours with the drop-downs). Is this a bug?

I've gone back and forth with TAC on this, and it's been explained to me that the function of the report has changed recently and the description for what it does is no longer valid. I STILL think there is a bug in this, however, as it appears whenever I run this report, it only shows me the unique clients RIGHT NOW, even if I pick "last day" which I'm told is really the only valid criterion... something is definitely broken here.

Reporting problems with Cisco WCS

hi all,
I was wondering whether anyone has experienced the following symptoms on Reporting.
WCS Rogue AP reports do not run and show up as 'Expired'
this does not occur to all the Rouge AP reports though (they are being created based on floor areas; one report per campus)
customer is using the following
WCS Version: 7.0.230.0
any idea on this, could this be a software bug?
thanks a lot
with kind regards,
Lancellot

Hi,
The report expires when it is scheduled report and configured for some specific time. After the time passed the report expires. re-schedule the report time and change the start-date time of the schedule and that should resolve your issue.
HTH
Amjad
Rating useful replies is more useful than saying "Thank you"

Crystal report problem

Post Author: ranganadhkodali
CA Forum: Authentication
Dear Group Members,
I have a vary big problem with crystal report XI edition, I am
unable to find the cause of the problem actually.
I am using Crystal Report XI Developer version to build
reports in my development system, which I am, using SQL server 2005 as a
backend database and u201CUn-Typedu201D Pull
model for generate reports, in that my system those are working very good.
For distribute those reports to the other clients, I was
prepared one small windows application in .net and I placed one shared
directory. Application will show all report files placed under the shared
directory by the user selection.
If User selects one report, I am taking the selected report
from the shared directory and open with the .net embedded crystal report
viewer, while opening I was filling the
server login information(By code itself).
Any way application also working very well in my development
system, for deploys this application I added crystal report redist package that
is came with the visual studio 2008.
When I run the same application, in deployed
system, it showing login database dialog with empty database name, and one more
thing is that database text box also showing like disable. So even I unable to
give database credential with in dialog. I donu2019t understood what is the cause
of the problem?
Almost same problem was happen before 4 months back for some
other project, @ that time I rebuild my report with the PUSh model, and it
working well. But this case, I donu2019t have a chance to do like that, because daily
I should generate some kind of reports, needs of management. That management
staff will check reports from with that my distributed application. For these
all things, I canu2019t rebuild and redistribute my application every time if I add
new report. So that I placed one shared folder and, I keep update all changed
reports files in that shared folder, my application will show them.
What is the cause of the problem?
Is it problem with connection? Then it should not work with
in my development system also
Then it probably problem with the deployment? Then I am able
to view the initial report, problem came only when I refresh the data?
If problems with deployment, then how it is works for push type reports, it giving problem
for only pull type reports?
thanks and regards Ranganadh Kodali

Please visit:
www.geocities.com/pmk16
Regards,
pmk16

GroupWise client reports that there is no Default Mail Clien

Installation of GroupWise client reports that there is no default mail client. On clicking OK the next error: "The 'MAPI Session Handle' of the Novell GroupWise 'Object Request Broker' could not be accessed. The address book cannot run.
In our company we use GroupWise 7 on a mix of Windows XP Pro and A few Windows 7 Pro machines. On all machines where the GroupWise 7 client with hot patch 4 (HP4) was installed everything works fine along with other installed applications with a specific mention of MS Office 2003 or even MS Office 2010.
This morning (August 9, 2011) a new Windows 7 machine was deployed to a new Database Administrator. It was this machine that had these errors. The machine was deployed from a disk image.
The problem was baffling because we never experienced this problem on the other Windows 7 machines and un-installing and re-installing GroupWise even with Administrator privileges did not solve the problem.
Anyway, to cut a long story short, the bottom line is this: Don't trust an installation made by someone else even if they are Database Administrators! (Our IT dept consists of an IT Operations section and a Developers Section).
The installation of Microsoft Office by the IT Operations crew never includes the Microsoft office OutLook client. This installation had it included and that was what was causing the whole problem.
The Solution: Simply use the Microsoft Office installation to remove the Microsoft Office Outlook client and the problem went away immediately. We did not have to remove and re-install GroupWise after that was done.
Hope this helps someone.

Kenlobo <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hope this helps someone.
>
Thanks for sharing this.
Danita - http://www.caledonia.net/blog

Inactive clients not showing up as inactive in console, but show on inactive client report

Good morning,
I have Client Status Reporting installed, configured, and reporting successful database updates on my SCCM 2007 install. However, the client properties don't list the machines as inactive. For example, one device on the report says inactive
but when I right-click > properties on the system object it lists the "active" property as 1 when it should be 0. Can anyone speculate why this isn't updating? I need to query my inactive machines to take into account my patch statistics
for upper management. If "inactive" isn't 0 then the query won't return any results. Thanks for any help!

Yes, I know this is an old post, I’m just trying to clean them up.
There can be many reason for this, but if I had to guess, I would thing that you have two object in the database with the exact same name, one active and one inactive. To solve the report problem I personally, delete all inactive PCs as
soon as I find them in the CM07 database.
http://www.enhansoft.com/

Client reports "fuzzy" / "broken up" appearance of type??!

I've been doing websites for some time now, and this is a new one for me. My client is reporting that the text in the sitewide header and footer, as well as any/all text that's created in image files appears "fuzzy" or "broken up" to him on some monitors. He reports this effect is happening on a 17" monitor with 1280 x 1024 resolution. I have the same size monitor and same resolution of the display, and I cannot see any problems viewing the site on IE or on Firefox. I've viewed the site from my work and home computers (and the home computer is set to an even LOWER resolution), and I'm apparently not seeing the effect he's seeing. All appears well to me.
The image files are generated using Adobe ImageReady using "smooth" or "sharp" settings for the text, and all are JPEGs generated at maximum quality, at standard web resolution of 72ppi. Settings: Quality 100, Blur: 0, and with checkboxes Optimized, Progressive, ICC Profile, and Preserve EXIF Metadata all turned OFF.
This is a complete headscratcher for me. I've of course explained to my client that text generated in image files will look somewhat "softer" than will body copy from text in the HTML of the pages, but he's telling me the text in the image files on the pages look just fine on some of his computer monitors, and just fine if he prints them out, but "fuzzy" and "broken up" on others, specifically the 17" at 1280 x 1024.
See site-in-progress is posted at
http://www.brn-management.com/janmiele/Mercer03/index.htm
I've never had anyone mention this before. What's going on here??
Any advice greatly appreciated!
---Jan

Yah. Hard to induce the client to pull out the manual for his monitor if he's in another town and just doesn't want to.
Harder still to convince him that just because this is happening to him, doesn't mean it's *not* happening to everyone else "out there" who might visit his website. Again I have asked him to look at other sites using the "problem" computer/browser combination to see if he's seeing the same effect on other sites, or if it's just this one site, and still no answer to that question.
This is what the client reports:
"Heres what I have found. Im running version 7.0.5730.13 Internet Explorer and while Im in the browser I have a zoom button down in the bottom right hand corner that defaults to 100%. If I select this and change the percentage to anything other than 100%, (i.e. 99% or 101% or 400%) the font look great. Only at 100% is the quality less than perfect."
So, at my home machine, which is running that version of the IE browser, I tried various combinations of the "Zoom" setting (including the ones he lists) as well as other screen resolution settings and I don't see anything eggregiously awry. Of course, Zooming a page to 400% *will* naturally cause *some* "fuzziness"
:-O
but other than that I'm not seeing anything that's not what I'd expect.
Unless I personally go to my client's office and try to see what else might be awry (aspect ratio? other settings?), and so long as he hasn't sent either me or the hosting service vendor a screenshot of what it is he's seeing that's wrong (I emailed him step by step instructions for how to get one and asked that he email it to both me and the hosting service), I cannot see the problem, nor can my tech-cohorts from the hosting service see it, much less fix it. I'm not a hardware person, but I'm beginning to wonder if I should send someone from Geek Officecalls over to his place of business to look into this.

I Ask About WCS count Client not same WLC

WCS count Client not same WLC as on WLC count client = 100
on WCS count = 23-23
Wireless Control System Version 5.2.148.0
WLC 7.0.250.0
http://postimg.org/image/9boldeqd5/
http://postimg.org/image/l482i9poz/

Your WCS should have a higher (or not equal) version to your WLC.
I wouldn't even consider troubleshooting WCS problems if your WCS is running 5.X because WCS/WLC firmwares 5.X are very, very buggy.

Client deletion Problem - Urjent..

Hi Experts,
There is an existing DEV-QA-PRD environment. There is a need to have a complete Configuration copy of PRD in DEV2 system, which will be used to build another Production Stream (DEV2, QA2, PRD2) for another project.
When we are deleting client ,below Problems we have facing :
1) Production equivalent client (4 TB of data) is taking too much time while deleting tables (step 4 in the diagram below).
2) Of the total 34,882 tables, 34,855 tables took almost 7-8 days to delete.
3) Last 30-35 tables are taking a lot of time to delete, these are probably the largest tables in the system
4) Tables EDIDS and CDCLS are currently being deleted for the last 3-4 days
5) Adding more processes to the Dev2 system is not helping either.
6) At the current rate, these tables will take another 1.5-2 weeks, which seems to be a long time
7) Some more tables which took more time were SWWLOGHIST, IDOCREL, SRRELROLES
Other information:
1) Operating System used for the ECC 5.0 is: Tru64 / HP, Oracle 9i DB (List of Service packs and Patches are attached)
2) Production system has data worth approx. 4TB
3) No Data Archiving has been done since the inception of the system
I need your Suggestions and Comments on this ---its urjent
Points will rewarded for suitable answers
Regards
Prabhu

Hi Prabhakar
Any other comments Plz...
Ok, you wanted it )) here is mine
so far:
- you copied your huge database (where you don't delete / archive old data) to the new server
- you are now deleting row by row all that data
- you will end up having a still huge but empty database, because the tables / tablespaces won't shrink after the client deletion
This does not make any sense to me, am i missing something :(((
Are there other clients in the prod system, which you keep?
@ Markus: i don't think they have 100+ gb memory to cache their huge tables in the sga
I guess the client deletion has something like a MAX ROWS COMMIT limit to prevent undo overflow. If this number is for example 100'000 rows, then you have to execute 100 delete statements (-> 100 full scans) on a 10mio row table. This of course is taking ages. Even worse it gets slower and slower, because the first delete up to 100'000 rows gets the first blocks, the second scans the same blocks, but they are empty now, so it has to scan further, and so on...
Best regards
Michael
Update: i recall there was a sap note somewhere, i just checked, here it is:
365304 - CC-ADMIN: Reports for deleting tables
Edited by: mho on Jan 8, 2008 2:40 PM

MI Deployment does not work - Client reports "Ignored old data"

Hi,
when syncing with an mi client (Mi2.5 SP13) to deploy MAM application. The Client reports:
Ignored old data that has been received for user XXX
The Trace-File says:
[20050906 10:28:45:953] I [MI/Sync                  ] Inbound file size for user xxx is 102
[20050906 10:28:45:953] P [MI/Sync                  ] Synchronisation successfully connected
[20050906 10:28:45:953] D [MI/Sync                  ] Begin: Dumping file C:\Programme\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\xxx\in\inbound.sync
<ID>MISYNC</ID><FLAGS>0x0</FLAGS><VERSION>251300</VERSION>
<PROLOG>
<JCO_INFO>JCO-library-version: 1.1.13; Creation time: UNDEFINED DATE UNDEFINED TIME</JCO_INFO>
<SYNC_STATUS>A</SYNC_STATUS>
<EXECUTION_TIME></EXECUTION_TIME>
<MORE_PACKAGES_WAITING> </MORE_PACKAGES_WAITING>
<SYNC_COUNTER>0</SYNC_COUNTER>
</PROLOG>
[20050906 10:28:45:953] D [MI/Sync                  ] End: Dumping file C:\Programme\SAP Mobile Infrastructure\sync\xxx\in\inbound.sync
[20050906 10:28:45:953] D [MI/Sync                  ] Initial buffer size of BinaryReader is 102
[20050906 10:28:45:953] P [MI/Sync                  ] Read current inbound counter from file: 0
[20050906 10:28:45:953] W [MI/Sync                  ] Execution time is not set; either old data received or processing wihtin middleware failed.
I have deleted any old assignments for the user and the device through the web console.
The problem consists after uninstall and reinstall of the mi client also on different devices.
Any ideas?
Thanks in advance
Alexander

Thanks for your help so far.
I did already install and reinstall the client.
I get this error for some, also newly created users and for others on the same machine it works!
I think it is related to the trace file row:
<JCO_INFO>JCO-library-version: 1.1.13; Creation time: UNDEFINED DATE UNDEFINED TIME</JCO_INFO>
This obviously leads to the conclusion that the data is outdated for the client.
The client and server are in the same timzone and also configured that way.
Any other ideas?
Thanks
Alexander

WCS coverage hole report explanation

Hi All,
I just ran the coverage hole report in WCS. The report shows below. Can anybody explain to me if there is a coverage hole in our production? I have no idea aobut what the state means and all the client counts are 0. We have some clients connected to these APs everyday. Thanks in advance.
Generated: Thu Jul 07 10:13:21 EDT 2011
Report By: AP By Controller
Access Point: XX.XX.199.140 -> h2200-8-lap1131-1;h2200-8-lap1131-2;h2200-8-lap1131-3;h2200-8-lap1131-4
Reporting Period: Last 7 days
Coverage Holes in the Network
Time
State
AP Name
Radio Type
Failed Clients
Total Clients
Worst Client RSSI
07/06/2011 10:29:46 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-1
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 10:24:09 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-1
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 14:13:03 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-1
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 14:08:01 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-1
802.11b/g
0
0
0
06/30/2011 14:22:03 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-1
802.11a
0
0
0
06/30/2011 14:17:01 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-1
802.11a
0
0
0
07/07/2011 10:12:33 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 15:15:36 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 15:05:31 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 14:14:21 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 14:09:12 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 11:15:40 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
Page 1 of
3
Time
State
AP Name
Radio Type
Failed Clients
Total Clients
Worst Client RSSI
07/06/2011 11:10:37 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 10:49:57 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 10:44:54 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/05/2011 14:24:46 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/05/2011 13:57:24 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 14:18:06 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 14:13:03 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11b/g
0
0
0
06/30/2011 14:53:01 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11a
0
0
0
06/30/2011 14:47:59 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-3
802.11a
0
0
0
07/06/2011 15:50:58 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 15:40:53 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 15:00:28 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 14:55:17 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 14:50:14 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 14:45:11 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 11:10:37 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/06/2011 11:05:34 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
Page 2 of
3
Time
State
AP Name
Radio Type
Failed Clients
Total Clients
Worst Client RSSI
07/04/2011 14:43:21 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 14:38:19 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 13:57:55 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 13:52:52 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 12:27:00 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 12:21:56 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 11:21:21 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
07/04/2011 11:16:19 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
06/30/2011 16:55:16 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
06/30/2011 16:50:13 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
06/30/2011 15:49:02 EDT
Clear
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
06/30/2011 15:33:36 EDT
Active
h2200-8-lap1131-4
802.11b/g
0
0
0
Page 3 of
3

What is exactly a coverage hole ?
If the WLC detects that a client is on an AP with a bad signal strength and stick with that AP, it notes it down. that means there is no other AP to roam to logically.
But because most clients are not so smart in roaming, the default treshold before taking an action is to detect 3 clients on the same AP with bad signal strength. Only then will the AP increase its transmit power (if it's not at the max already).
When the client limit is not reached, it's a "pre coverage hole" alert. The coverage hole itself is when the right number of clients are detected.
Clear is when the clients left or if the AP increased its power (so the clients are at a better signal). Active is that the clients are still there at bad signal (then either there is no enough clients to take action or the AP is already at max power).

Report problem directly in iTunes has been disabled?

I had understood that it was possible to report a problem on a purchase directly from within iTunes, by going to my account, history then selcting the ourchase that had the problem.
However the "Report a Problem"link now just boots me off to the Apple website, the previous button to describe the problem and submit no longer appears.
Does anyone know if this has been disabled?
I am having season pass problems on an iPad and it seems there is no solution - Apple - it just doesn't work anymore
Worminger2

Interestingly clicking on Report a problem in iTunes sends me off to a web page with the URL:
"http://www.apple.com/uk/support/itunes/store/seasonpass/"
but this immediately redirects to:
"http://www.apple.com/uk/support/itunes/#video_purchases"
which is actually just the opening page of the iTunes support page in the apple webpages, ie totally useless.
I am guessing they are overwhelmed by reported problems and are just opting out of having to deal with them. Reminds me of the dear old days of Microsoft hiding from problems.
Worminger2

WCS Busiest Client Report Problem

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for