What's your most annoying trophy?

Firstly, I'm not the sort of gamer that plays games for trophies. But, every now and then I will go after 100% a game and trophies come into that. I don't mind difficult trophies, ones that require skill... however, there are some trophies that really grind my gears. The sort of trophies that require you to collect 1000 randomly scattered items over this map for no discernible reason spring to mind.
Right now though there is a trophy that is start to really [insert preferred profanity here] me off. Sadly it's a trophy that I feel bad raging about, because of why it exists. I'm talking about the "tribute to a Vault Hunter" trophy in Borderlands 2 on the PS4. For those of you not familiar with the story, Gear Box Games put the likeness of a chap called Mike Marmaril in the game as a tribute to a fan who sadly died. A really nice tribute.
However, it is now starting to really annoy me. I've played through the game on PS4 now with 5 characters in total, always looking for him while back in Sanctuary, I've even started the game in NG+ mode. He has not appeared for me once. That's all I need. So I guess my question is, what trophies have really annoyed you?

PermanentlyAngry wrote:
@trenchy he is random. Drpending on who you believe it's somewhere between 5% to 10% spawn chance. But there is no way to increase the chance at all. It's mind numbingly dull, and I now hate the guy with a burning passion. If he wasn't already dead I'd organise a lynch mob!!!He can appear at Sanctuary base,Scooters,Moxxi's Bar,Doctor Zed's and Marcus's,the spawn at Scooters can be easily missed if you use the entrance near Zed's he's spawns under the stairs.Best advice I can give is try all the above locations save and quit rinse and repeat till he does appear,failling that try another character had some characters drop more legendary loot compared to others.

Similar Messages

  • What is your most-used Sun Java Creator feature/widget/key sequence

    As I am learning about the IDE and using it to develop apps, I wonder about the most commonly used features that I have yet to learn about. Especially the key sequences that could save me time.
    What features do you find yourself using the most? What features do you rely on as productivity enhancers?

    Hi,
    Thanks for your interest in Sun Java Studio Creator.
    Apparently the Studio Creator offers drag-and-drop, RAD approach to J2EE development. Java Studio Creator blends together technologies such as JSF, JDBC Rowsets, and the Web Services APIs to give J2EE developers a brisk-start when it comes to building web applications. The developers without being tied to proprietary technologies, developers can work with and within Creator or easily take their code with them to a number of development platforms.
    Requirement of more sophisticated technologies to meet user demands, enterprise developers can incorporate EJB's.
    Please have a walkthrough of the IDE features in the following links.
    http://www.sun.com/software/products/jscreator/features.xml
    http://developer.sun.com/prodtech/javatools/jscreator/
    Keep looking for new features and updates of the iDE.
    Cheers :)
    Creator Team.

  • QUESTION:  What is your most critical learning need for 2010?

    There are no boundaries to this question.  What topic is of most interest to you to learn during 2010?  And while you're at it, tell me your preferred method of learning this topic - classroom, virtual, e-learning, podcast, webinar, or some other approach?  All answers are appreciated...thanks.

    Hello
    Here is the search link for all 4 courses (http://www.sap.com/usa/services/education/searchcourse.epx?context=%5b%5bBPC*%7c%7c%7c%7c%7c%7c%7c%5d%5d%7c).  Click on each of the courses and notice the course schedule tab.  If the course is offered in the virtual environment, you will see it listed in the schedule. 
    Two last points
    1. if you need to use the course request process, please try this link: https://www.sap.com/usa/services/education/request.epx?kNtBzmUK9zU.
    2. if you have other questions, please feel free to let me know.

  • What's your proudest platinum trophy?

    Probably battlefield 3 platinum trophy. One of the coop missions had you take multiple synchronised sniper shots one after the other. Did that with no mics on hardest difficulty.

    Well I only got one, so that has to be my proudest by default lol
    The Walking Dead.
    Next up will most likely be Game of Thrones by same company, Telltale games. 
    If I'm being honest, despite being Game of Thrones major fan I preferred the Walking Dead game. So with that in mind, it will most likely remain my proudest Plat.
    One day I will work hard to get a Plat, and that day it will be my proudest. I still want Portal to be a Plat but that involves going back to PS3.
    Anyone got Platinum in GTAV yet? I wonder how achievable it really is, for people like me I mean.

  • Some of the most annoying SJC issues:

    As I promised I will post some bugs I found. Will start from the most annoying for me:
    1. Visual designer does not show JSPF fragment components inside GridPanel or GroupPanel. This is just a terrible issue.
    2. CSS cannot be be assigned to JSPF during design time. I understand that JSPFs use CSS of the container page in run time but how am I going to design JSPF without CSS? Do I have to always go to the container page and preview how JSPF really looks? Sometimes when I get back from the container to JSPF it retains the styling but after refresh it gets absolutely styless again.
    3. If I am binding the "Rendered" property of a component (such as grid panel), it disappears from the visual designer (after you click refresh) and will never reappear until you unbind it.

    (1) VIsual designer does not show JSPF fragment inside GridPanel or GroupPanel: The reason this happens is that GridPanel and GroupPanel are JSF components which encode their own children; you can't put plan markup as direct children of these components (you can't do that for data table either). And a page fragment is going to be an HTML fragment; usually a <div> (look at the JSP source of your fragment). We should try to handle this better; at a minimum preventing the drop (since it doesn't work) but better yet try to fix it if we can. An< f:verbatim> here isn't what you want (this is how you can usually embed html in encoding-children components) because you don't want the JSF children of your html tag inserted verbatim. Somebody in support, can you file an issue to track this one please?
    (2) CSS in fragments: That's a reasonable request. The reason it's not shown there is as you suspected; fragments don't have their own stylesheets (stylesheets can only be added to html documents in the <head> section, and fragments are portions of <body>.)
    Also, in addition to not knowing which stylesheets are in pages that might include the fragments, we also don't know the context; when you see a fragment included in another page it doesn't just pick up styles from the stylesheets but from the context too (for example, a font-size: 48pt setting on a containing element will inherit right into the fragment). Thus, the fragment needs to know the exact element context it should use too.
    If there are multiple pages including the fragment, they might use the same stylesheet if we're lucky, but the fragments will almost certainly have different style element contexts.
    As you've noticed, the fragments already show the styling of the last page they were rendered as part of. This is a side effect of model sharing, and it's a bug I didn't think important to fix since it's sometimes nice ;-)
    However, I can see the argument that in some cases, especially if a fragment is included by only pages with the same stylesheet, it would be nice to apply those styles in the fragments too, even if it won't correctly include other style contexts from the pages. That's a reasonable request.
    (3) Rendered value binding: I agree, we should special case this to make sure rendered is considered true at designtime. I've gotta investigate how that works with some layout components though (like card layout) which I think relies on this (hiding all but one at design time)).
    -- Tor
    http://blogs.sun.com/tor

  • HT1657 Downloaded rush yesterday on my iPad2 - went to watch it today. 1.23 seconds in I get error message "cannot load video" Most annoying! Not happened before. Please ether fix or give me my money back

    Downloaded "Rush" yesterday on my iPad2 - sat down to watch it today. 1.23 seconds in, I get error message "cannot load video" Most annoying! Not happened before. Please ether fix or give me my money back asap
    Jody

    We are fellow users here on these user-to-user forums, you're not talking to iTunes Support nor Apple.
    What have you tried to fix it ? Have you tried closing the Videos app via the iPad's multitasking bar and seeing if it plays properly when you re-open then app ? Have you tried a soft-reset of your iPad ? If neither of those fix it then are you in a country where films can be redownloaded (assuming that it's not a rental) ? If you are then delete it from the Videos app and redownload it via the Purchased tab in the iTunes store app.
    If you can't redownload it (e.g. if it's a rental) then try the 'report a problem' page to contact iTunes Support : http://reportaproblem.apple.com
    If the 'report a problem' link doesn't work then you can try contacting iTunes support via this page : http://www.apple.com/support/itunes/contact/- click on Contact iTunes Store Support on the right-hand side of the page, then Purchases, Billing & Redemption

  • My new speakers make the most annoying hissing noise!

    I have just purchased a set of creative megaworks 250d, now having owned an older set of speakers from creative in the past (dt surround system) i had expected the same good quality sound and craftsmanship.
    What did i get? The most annoying hissing sound in the world!
    I switch my system on and it gives out an audible hiss which can be heard upto 5-10meters away, this is completely ridiculous and pretty much ruins any sound which isnt played at a loud level!
    Ive contacted creative customer support who told me to return my product? well, fat use that is when i got my system from ebay and apparently the entire range does the same thing anyway?
    Please no comments about how my system is setup wrong and whether i have power interference, because just to check this i've been to maplins today to buy a power conditioner/filter (which cost me ?100 i may add) and a ground loop isolator, neither of these made any difference at all, still the digital snake invades my ears every time i turn the system on.
    Now i dont know what your trying to pull down at creative labs, but i can guarantee you wont be staying in the market lead making 'high quality computer audio products' that are by design defective. I want a valid solution to my problem please, i see 100 other threads on the internet concerning the same thing and quite frankly its not good enough. How much would it have cost you to install a pass filter inline to the amplifier to reduce this hiss? or is there one and its broken? is it the remote like some people are suggesting?

    *BUMP* Any solution would be good? im fairly adept with electronics so dont mind taking the unit apart if a technician would like to tell me how to fix this hiss. Would a low pass filter on the speaker line be a good solution or maybe ferrite coils on the positve wire?, would either of those work before i go out and spend yet more money?

  • What's YOUR Idea of an "Ideally Organized HD?

    What's YOUR Idea of an "Ideally Organized HD?"
    I've been giving this a lot of thought lately. Whereas it is obvious that OSX organizes your hard drive better than anything on Windoze, especially when you consider the power derived from using Spotlight, I have been wondering exactly WHAT, WHAT does an Ideally Organized Hard Drive look like? What are it's properties? I don't mean how it should look specifically to YOU, the single user. I mean what does an ideally organized Hard Drive look like to everyone running OSX? (which is everyone). What are some of the components of a ideally organized hard drive? What does it look like/feel like? Not necessarily in order of importance, I'll start this one off:
    An Ideally Organized Hard Drive Has These Properties (feel free to add your ideas):
    1) All the music, documents, apps, pictures and movies go into their designated locations, just for starters. You may even want to create another main Category such as I did, and call it "All Talk & Sound FX". Here's where I stick my voice, and talk radio, and verbal jokes etc. for example.
    2) There are NO identical (duplicate) files, but the thorough and profuse use of Alias files are implemented. {{{if you have duplicates, and you update the one, you necessarily have to update the other, otherwise, you don't have duplicates anymore, right? But if you use an Alias, no matter which file, original or Alias, that you update, BOTH files are updated.}}}
    3) The HD is organized for EASY Backup on a daily basis: Everything new gets placed into an "Everything New" file (call it what you want) on the Desktop, then this one folder is backed up daily, saved onto an external HD, then loaded back and now actually saved onto the HD as new stuff just once a week (in accordance to #1); this is the outcome from doing a Restore from this backed-up "Everything New" folder. Everything goes into this "Everything New" folder on a daily basis; however, Applications are installed immediately whereas everything else just gets popped into the "Everything New" folder for holding.
    4) Many files are annotated in the Get Info Window with easy to find key words and comments. Spotlight will do the rest my friends!
    5) A DMG of the HD (a perfect Clone which is achieved using your Tiger Disk--Disk Utility) is done on a weekly basis (heck, all you have to do is launch the software at night, go to bed, have an automatic shutdown on your Mac for about 3.5 hours later (for a 23GB DMG Disk Image)). {{Note that a Restore from the "Everything New" folder must be done first!, prior to making the DMG}} When this Disk Image is made, it will have All of your Preferences, All of your newly installed applications, All of your Bookmarks, All of your new additions to iCal, All of your new Addresses, EVERYTHING, and therefore these specific folders do NOT have to be backed up **separately** by using this process as I describe.
    Once a week you will Restore from this DMG (which takes an hour if you have previously verified/mounted this image), then delete the week-old Backup of the "Everything Folder", because your HD now now has all these files added to it (remember, the key here is to do a Restore from the "Everything New" folder first, before you made the most recent DMG). You can now also delete any old Disk Images that you want, because you will be making more! (I always keep 2 or 3 on hand). You can now also delete any old "Everything New" backups from your External, because you will be making more of these backups as well!
    6) Your Hard Drive should utilize the copious amount of custom icons, in order to quickly spot and identify files/folders.
    7) You have created shortcuts (Alias') on the HD, which point to spots on the External HD, (which is not only used for Backup as recently described) to facilitate the transfer of large files (example: AIFF's) to/from the external HD. My External HD has a working "Powerbook" folder where these files are saved to, keeping my internal HD at a bare minimum of growing size, yet the files are easily uploaded/downloaded between the external and internal, and viewed, when the External is attached (of course) to the internal.
    8) The hard drive lacks any sensitive material whatsoever, i.e. passwords are kept on an external hard drive, and new ones are backed up daily to the Everything New folder. Using a free program such as Password Vault also strengthens this area of security and organization. If the Passwords are kept to an external location, and yet are easily accessed by an Alias, then they are 100% safe to reside on the External, since the External would have to be attached in order for the passwords to be read.
    9) Maintenance is run routinely on the HD, using a program such as Onyx, especially before and after the disk image process. You can also schedule Onyx to run the Apple maintenance scripts automatically, when you are asleep. Also part of this maintenance would be running a program such as Disk Warrior, before and after the disk image process. Onyx and Disk Warrior go hand in hand, and although you will not "see" (visually) HOW your HD has been organized more efficiently, you will experience the benefits of using Disk Warrior (faster/more responsive), which organized your HD Directory automatically.
    10) Another nice little Utility is SpeedTools, which has a great program for Defraging files. Yes, I've found that Disk Defrag does work. Point #10 does nothing for "organizing", however I make this point because Disk Defrag does indeed help your HD to run more efficiently (thus faster).
    *** Ohh by the way, maybe I'm saying the following as a joke, maybe I'm not. But if you follow my suggestions above, you wouldn't be so paranoid about downloading the latest update to Tiger (or Leopard when that comes out) because the old "Archive & Install" option becomes obsolete. If you run into trouble NOW, using my methods, you now have the peace of knowing that you have a perfectly Cloned Disk Image of your valuable, ideally organized Mac HD, residing on an external drive and just waiting to be called into action! ***
    Finally, please note that I am not telling you how to organize your hard drive, I am only suggesting this as one way to do it, and the way that I do it. If you have something totally different from this, but it works for you, please post that. If you want to add to what I've said, go right ahead! But if you don't agree with something I've said, then by all means offer your own suggestion and be civil about it! Thanks!
    ~ Vito

    You and everyone else that takes the time to read, and understand what I said, and can benefit from this, is WELCOME! ; )
    By the way, I forgot to mention. I use "Micon" a little terrific freeware program (from VersionTracker) to make (initialize) my custom icons. I also use Graphic Converter to make my own original icons of anything I like. Don't underestimate the value in making your own custom icons-- they really stand out from the "standard old blue".
    ~ Vito

  • Forms and validations - here's some of my ideas, what are yours?

    One of the big things still missing from the JFX space (especially where JEE is concerned) is forms and form validations. Maybe you guys have been luckier but at least 80% of the screens I've had to build in my career have been boring old forms - enter data in the fields, validate them and hit submit.
    So, I've been hacking around on this to try and get a pattern and hopefully some reusable classes for doing this in JavaFX. I have something that works but the code is verbose and less than elegant. I'm hoping some of you guys might want to kick around some ideas on this with me here. If we can come up with something that works, I'd like to either include it in [url http://www.zenjava.com/jfx-flow/]JFX Flow, or put it out as a separate open source project (whichever makes more sense).
    What I think needs to be supported:
    * Map between a normal Java bean and the fields on a form
    * Validate the data, i.e. specifying the constraints on a field and then checking those constraints
    * Show a validation summary at the top of the form
    * Highlight individual fields if they have validation errors
    * Support auto-validation, i.e. the validation highlights and messages will instantly update as the user types
    Some extra restrictions:
    * The data input will ideally be a normal bean and so it won't have observable values on it. In most projects I use, the beans are coming from the server and sometimes may be shared between desktop client and a jsp/web client, or even be a third party API so they can't be changed. End result: we don't want any JFX complexities or dependencies in our server code (design leak). This rule could be bent but only as a last resort.
    * The validations must be defined relative to the normal data bean not a JFX model or controller, etc. This is so the bean can be validated on the server as well as the client. The server must do validation to prevent dodgy data getting in (never trust a client). Ideally we don't want to be specifying the validations in two places (i.e. once for the client and once for the server) as this creates maintenance problems and weakens the integrity of the system over time.
    * Ideally the validation mechanism will be based on [url http://java.dzone.com/articles/bean-validation-and-jsr-303]JSR 303 - Bean Validations as this is quite nice. This is flexible however if there is a suitable alternative that integrates better.
    To give us something to reference in conversation, I've created a small working sample. This is only meant to be a rough starting point (at best) and I'd really like to get feedback on both the code (i.e. should we have a 'presentation model', how could bindings be better used, etc) and the general way I'm representing errors (i.e. should we use tooltips to show errors, or actually show the errors next to the field, should we use border colours or put a little exclamation mark over the field, should the fields be auto-validated or only validated on submit, etc).
    The example is a single form for editing a person. It has three fields, first name, last name and gender. When the form is blank, auto-editing is off. When the user submits the form it is validated and from that point on auto-validating is on. Error fields are highlighted with a style change, and a tooltip is added with details (I think we can do better - what's your ideas?).
    I have used all plain Java to keep thngs simple, but I'd be looking for the end result to translate to FXML as well. I've also coded everything into the one class but the eventual goal would be to have the common stuff moved out to reusable base classes, etc.
    Here's a workspace with some example code in it: http://code.google.com/p/jfxee/source/browse/trunk/jfxforms/
    Here's a running deploy of that code: http://zenjava.com/demo/form/forms.html
    (edit: I've moved the code to its own project and changed the url for the launch - the values above are the new, correct ones)
    Looking forward to hearing some thoughts on this topic.
    Edited by: zonski on 01-Dec-2011 13:41

    At Devoxx I did some straw man prototype that you might find useful (or hopeless, I'm not sure which, I did it in a hurry :-)). I followed some principles that I was influenced by years back by JGoodies, but I haven't looked at the JGoodies stuff in forever and know it isn't all the same. But anyway, like I said, I'm not sure it is actually useful but maybe there is something genius hidden in there.
    I have a Validator, which is just a simple SAM:
    import javafx.scene.control.Control;
    * @author Richard
    public interface Validator<C extends Control> {
        public ValidationResult validate(C control);
    }The idea is that it is given a Control, it will validate that control, and then return a ValidationResult. ValidationResult is actually only needed in cases of errors, since returning null indicates success, so the following is somewhat of a crock but you could rename it ValidationError or something and remove the "SUCCESS" type and there you are.
    public class ValidationResult {
        public enum Type { ERROR, WARNING, SUCCESS }
        private final String message;
        private final Type type;
        public ValidationResult(String message, Type type) {
            this.message = message;
            this.type = type;
        public final String getMessage() {
            return message;
        public final Type getType() {
            return type;
        }For good measure I threw in a ValidationEvent.
    import javafx.event.Event;
    import javafx.event.EventType;
    * @author Richard
    public class ValidationEvent extends Event {
        public static final EventType<ValidationEvent> ANY =
                new EventType<ValidationEvent>(Event.ANY, "VALIDATION");
        private final ValidationResult result;
        public ValidationEvent(ValidationResult result) {
            super(ANY);
            this.result = result;
        public final ValidationResult getResult() { return result; }
    }Because Control's don't presently have the notion of validation built in, I created a ValidationPane which is like a specialized StackPane, where there is a bottom layer, the control, and a glass pane layer. And from CSS you can style it however you like. The ValidationPane has a CSS style class set in case of errors / warnings. So without augmenting controls, the idea is that a ValidationPane subclass would exist to wrap each type of control you needed to validate. It did this because somebody has to wire up the listeners to the control to react on text input etc, and so I thought I'd like that encapsulated in something reusable, and there it was.
    import javafx.beans.DefaultProperty;
    import javafx.beans.property.ObjectProperty;
    import javafx.beans.property.ReadOnlyObjectProperty;
    import javafx.beans.property.ReadOnlyObjectWrapper;
    import javafx.beans.property.SimpleObjectProperty;
    import javafx.beans.value.ChangeListener;
    import javafx.beans.value.ObservableValue;
    import javafx.event.EventHandler;
    import javafx.scene.control.Control;
    import javafx.scene.layout.Region;
    * @author Richard
    @DefaultProperty("content")
    public abstract class ValidatorPane<C extends Control> extends Region {
         * The content for the validator pane is the control it should work with.
        private ObjectProperty<C> content = new SimpleObjectProperty<C>(this, "content", null);
        public final C getContent() { return content.get(); }
        public final void setContent(C value) { content.set(value); }
        public final ObjectProperty<C> contentProperty() { return content; }
         * The validator
        private ObjectProperty<Validator<C>> validator = new SimpleObjectProperty<Validator<C>>(this, "validator");
        public final Validator<C> getValidator() { return validator.get(); }
        public final void setValidator(Validator<C> value) { validator.set(value); }
        public final ObjectProperty<Validator<C>> validatorProperty() { return validator; }
         * The validation result
        private ReadOnlyObjectWrapper<ValidationResult> validationResult = new ReadOnlyObjectWrapper<ValidationResult>(this, "validationResult");
        public final ValidationResult getValidationResult() { return validationResult.get(); }
        public final ReadOnlyObjectProperty<ValidationResult> validationResultProperty() { return validationResult.getReadOnlyProperty(); }
         *  The event handler
        private ObjectProperty<EventHandler<ValidationEvent>> onValidation =
                new SimpleObjectProperty<EventHandler<ValidationEvent>>(this, "onValidation");
        public final EventHandler<ValidationEvent> getOnValidation() { return onValidation.get(); }
        public final void setOnValidation(EventHandler<ValidationEvent> value) { onValidation.set(value); }
        public final ObjectProperty<EventHandler<ValidationEvent>> onValidationProperty() { return onValidation; }
        public ValidatorPane() {
            content.addListener(new ChangeListener<Control>() {
                public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends Control> ov, Control oldValue, Control newValue) {
                    if (oldValue != null) getChildren().remove(oldValue);
                    if (newValue != null) getChildren().add(0, newValue);
        protected void handleValidationResult(ValidationResult result) {
            getStyleClass().removeAll("validation-error", "validation-warning");
            if (result != null) {
                if (result.getType() == ValidationResult.Type.ERROR) {
                    getStyleClass().add("validation-error");
                } else if (result.getType() == ValidationResult.Type.WARNING) {
                    getStyleClass().add("validation-warning");
            validationResult.set(result);
            fireEvent(new ValidationEvent(result));
        @Override
        protected void layoutChildren() {
            Control c = content.get();
            if (c != null) {
                c.resizeRelocate(0, 0, getWidth(), getHeight());
        @Override
        protected double computeMaxHeight(double d) {
            Control c = content.get();
            return c == null ? super.computeMaxHeight(d) : c.maxHeight(d);
        @Override
        protected double computeMinHeight(double d) {
            Control c = content.get();
            return c == null ? super.computeMinHeight(d) : c.minHeight(d);
        @Override
        protected double computePrefHeight(double d) {
            Control c = content.get();
            return c == null ? super.computePrefHeight(d) : c.prefHeight(d);
        @Override
        protected double computePrefWidth(double d) {
            Control c = content.get();
            return c == null ? super.computePrefWidth(d) : c.prefWidth(d);
        @Override
        protected double computeMaxWidth(double d) {
            Control c = content.get();
            return c == null ? super.computeMaxWidth(d) : c.maxWidth(d);
        @Override
        protected double computeMinWidth(double d) {
            Control c = content.get();
            return c == null ? super.computeMinWidth(d) : c.minWidth(d);
    }And finally the TextInputValidatorPane instance good for any TextInputControl. I think.
    import javafx.beans.InvalidationListener;
    import javafx.beans.Observable;
    import javafx.beans.value.ChangeListener;
    import javafx.beans.value.ObservableValue;
    import javafx.scene.control.TextInputControl;
    * @author Richard
    public class TextInputValidatorPane<C extends TextInputControl> extends ValidatorPane<C> {
        private InvalidationListener textListener = new InvalidationListener() {
            public void invalidated(Observable o) {
                final Validator v = getValidator();
                final ValidationResult result = v != null ?
                    v.validate(getContent()) :
                    new ValidationResult("", ValidationResult.Type.SUCCESS);
                handleValidationResult(result);
        public TextInputValidatorPane() {
            contentProperty().addListener(new ChangeListener<C>() {
                public void changed(ObservableValue<? extends C> ov, C oldValue, C newValue) {
                    if (oldValue != null) oldValue.textProperty().removeListener(textListener);
                    if (newValue != null) newValue.textProperty().addListener(textListener);
        public TextInputValidatorPane(C field) {
            this();
            setContent(field);
    }This should also be usable as is from FXML since you can easily wrap a TextInputValidatorPane around a TextField, and CSS does all the styling, so I think it all just works. You probably need to have some library of sophisticated Validators which know how to read text from a TextField and compare against the validation annotations, but otherwise it should work well enough. Anyway, in the actual implementation I think I would omit the ValidationPane stuff completely and just build that part into the controls / skins. Like I said, this was a quick hack but seemed to get the "how do I visualize validation errors" part of the problem solved.
    Richard

  • Laptop editing with Premiere Pro CS4: what are the most important specs

    Laptop Editing: What are the MOST important specs?
    Hello everybody, I have been a long time lurker, but I decided to join in and share my voice.
    I've been editing, for a while now, various projects of various lenghts shot on my HV20, on an IMac using Adobe Premiere Pro. Actually, I bought the CS4 Extended Production Suite last year  thinking that it made sense to be able to edit, do the coloring and effects+ sound all within the same suite.
    AND, it came with OnLocation, wich is, I think, a fantastic tool. I really want to be able to record and monitor my future shoots using OnLocation. I've seen how useful monitors and scopes are on set, and the idea of being able to shoot in HD and actually checking the focus on something larger than a few inches is very appealling!
    So a laptop is in my future. Now, what are the most important specs?
    I could buy 1) a barely used Macbook pro early 08- 17" HD led display ,4g Ram ddr2 ,nvidia 8600M GT 512 VRAM ,800Mhz BUS, 200G 7200HD
    and have enough money left to buy an Apple Display 30" refurb
    OR 2) a new Macbook pro 17, 4 g Ram ddr3, 512 VRAm, 4g Ram ddr3, double procsessors 9400M+9600M GT 512 VRAM, 1066 BUS, 500G 7200HD
    and wait for a second display!
    Plus, of course, a portable External Scratch Drive on the Express Card. Now, if that fast drive is handling the footage, could'nt I settle for a 5400HD in the laptop,, they seem much less prone to problems-clicking noise, heat-than the 7200, especially in the new unibody model. Is 800 versus 1066 BUS a terrible trade-off? In terms of secondary displays , I've heard less than lukewarm things about the new Apple 24 LED (glossy is no-no for me).
    My intentions are to make documentaries and short fictions as well. I make a living as an actor so I don't need to be performing as a director/editor business wise!
    I do want to explore that side of the craft, in a professional and enjoyable way though. I know that, in addition to the laptop, I will get a MacPro in a few years.
    Thanks a lot for the inputs!

    Successful video editing (as compared to tear your hair out video editing) requires at least two hard drives... one for all software and one for all data... some people use 3 drives, with data on one and scratch files on the 3rd drive
    I'm not sure about software, but everything I've ever read in this forum says 5400 is NOT fast enough for the data drive
    If you want to edit video... you have to buy the hardware that works

  • Laptop Video Editing: What are the MOST important specs

    I've been editing, for a while now, various projects of various lenghts shot on my HV20, on an IMac using Adobe Premiere Pro. Actually, I bought the CS4 Extended Production Suite. It came with OnLocation, which is, I think, a fantastic tool. I really want to be able to record and monitor my future shoots using OnLocation. I've seen how useful monitors and scopes are on set, and the idea of being able to shoot in HD and actually checking the focus on something larger than a few inches is very appealling!
    So a laptop is in my future. Now, what are the most important specs?
    I could buy 1) a barely used Macbook pro early 08- 17" HD led display ,4g Ram ddr2 ,nvidia 8600M GT 512 VRAM ,800Mhz BUS, 200G 7200HD
    and have enough money left to buy an Apple Display 30" refurb
    OR 2) a new Macbook pro 17, 4 g Ram ddr3, 512 VRAm, 4g Ram ddr3, double procsessors 9400M+9600M GT 512 VRAM, 1066 BUS, 500G 7200HD
    and wait for a second display!
    Plus, of course, a portable External Scratch Drive on the Express Card. Now, if that fast drive is handling the footage, could'nt I settle for a 5400HD in the laptop,, they seem much less prone to problems-clicking noise, heat-than the 7200, especially in the new unibody model. Is 800 versus 1066 BUS a terrible trade-off? In terms of secondary displays , I've heard less than lukewarm things about the new Apple 24 LED (glossy is no-no for me).
    My intentions are to make documentaries and short fictions as well. I make a living as an actor so I don't need to be performing as a director/editor business wise!
    I do want to explore that side of the craft, in a professional and enjoyable way though. I know that, in addition to the laptop, I will get a MacPro in a few years.
    Thanks a lot for the inputs!

    CPU, RAM, bus speed, system HD, external HD, graphics - basically in that order
    You should think in terms of purchasing for maximum future use. In that regard the new 17" MacBookPro is the way to go. The specs are significantly better than the early '08 MacBook and you will be much happier in the long run with performance, software support and longevity.
    If you really need a large display, consider a 24" Dell, HP, NEC, etc. in the $200-$300 price range to stay within your total budget. You will be pleasantly surprised how good they are.
    You could start out with the 5400rpm system HD - you can replace it anytime with a 7200rpm drive if necessary for hardly any more $ than it would cost in the first place; and replacing it does NOT void your warranty. But you WILL want/need a good external FW800 or eSATA drive (for eSATA you will need an eSATA expressCard/34 however) no matter what.
    One other thought, if your primary use will be with an external display, and you don't actually need eSATA capability (FW800 will do you just fine at this point), then the 15" 2.66GHz or 2.8GHz MacBookPro models will be just fine at a significantly lower cost than the 17" model.

  • What are your impressions of "multi-tasking"?

    If you have iOS4 and a capable device, you should have multi-tasking and opened apps appearing in the task bar. Newer app versions are able to run in the background. In my opinion, when I close most apps (by pressing the home button), I want them to close completely, not run in the background. Aside from being a privacy issue, apps in the task bar may use battery power or if truly in a suspended mode, they still take up memory or process capability. In order to really shut them down, two additional home button clicks and then two more screen strokes are required. Not very efficient and probably leading to an earlier home button failure. Why not have some kind of screen command (tap or swipe combination?) to simultaneously shut down all apps in the task bar? The bar itself is useless if you have used many apps in the course of a day. To find what you're looking for, you have to scroll through a long parade of icons. It's a lot easier to just tap the icon where you know it is sitting in the nice folder you created. I don't get it. I realize the bar can be used for switching open apps, but this is really not that big of a deal for the vast majority of apps. Furthermore, there should be an option to enable or disable multi-tasking globally as well as for individual apps. Now that would be an improvement.
    What are your thoughts?

    I havent done any kind of multitasking on my ipod touch, im waiting to upgrade my software to the newer one. However, I couldnt agree more with that of pressing the home button many times to perform basic function to switch apps or enable the multitasking ability. I think palm adapted a better design of software than apple ever did with their IOS 4. Palm's webOS can handle full multitasking--something the iPhone can't do. Palm uses what it calls "a deck of cards model" for managing multitasking: You can view each of your open applications at once, shuffle them any way you choose, and then discard the ones you want to close. All of this is done with intuitive gestures that mimic handling a physical deck of cards. Apps remains live, even when minimized into the card view, so changes can continue to happen in real-time, even if you've moved on to another activity.
    I had the time to experience a bit of a palm web os software on an AT&T store and my impression on that software is done more elegantly than apple multitasking home pressing button system.
    P.S to NYtroutbum: you should definitely present that idea to apple by its feedback product page. Let's hope it listens.

  • Have Photoshop Elements from 2001.  Got new computer with Windows 7 Professional 64 bit.  It won't run on my new computer.  What version is MOST SIMILAR to the old version I have, that will run on W7P-64?  Thanks for any help.  Popjer

    Have Photoshop Elements from 2001.  Got new computer with Windows 7 Professional 64 bit.  It won't run on my new computer.  What version is MOST SIMILAR to the old version I have, that will run on W7P-64?  Thanks for any help.  Popjer

    You should probably just download the trial version of pse 12 and see if you can live with it.
    Download a free trial or buy Adobe products | Adobe downloads
    That being said, have you tried to install pse 1 on your computer?
    How much free space is on your hard drive?
    Do you have Internet Explorer 10 or 11?
    Pse 1 can run on windows 7 x64, provided certain conditions are met.

  • What is the most RAM I can put in mac book pro 15 inch 2.16(2006)?

    What is the most RAM I can put in mac book pro 15 inch 2.16(2006)?

    Depends. There were two version of the MBP that shipped in 2006 with different max RAM. The quickest way to see which is yours is to use System Profiler to get your Mac's "Model Identifier."
    Do "About this Mac" from the Apple menu and, in the resulting window, click "More Info..." That launches System Profler for you.
    The answer is in the first screen of Profiler that comes up--"Hardware Overview." Note the second line in this example:
    If the Model Identifier says "MacBookPro1,X" you are limited to 2G RAM. Period.
    If the Model Identifier says "MacBookPro2,X" you can install two, 2G modules for an installed total of 4G RAM, but the logic board can only access 3.2G of it. That becomes your "max RAM.
    Hope this helps,
    AJ

  • The future of java and what is the most necessary skill to learn

    hi, friends,
    This is a serious question, so please answer seriously.
    1. The future of java
    Are there any future for java? What I mean are: are there any jobs for java developer in the future? are there any chances for new java company to survive?
    2. What is the most needed skill in so many java technology?
    There are so many sections in java technology. so what is the most needed one for one to find a job? what is the most promising section for one to build a company.
    Thank your very much!

    It's a lousy question really.
    1) There are very few companies you'd call a 'java company'. There are companies that use java, but they also by and large use C++, DBMS systems, and a whole host of other technologies. If java died, they'd switch to whatever technology killed it. Any decent programmer is flexible enough to learn a new language in a matter of weeks. It's the ability to work with the theory behind the code rather than the knowledge of syntax that's important.
    2) It depends entirely on what you're doing. Working with a company where databases are key? Then you need Oracle, or SQL. Working with web technology? Perl, JSP, PHP, stuff like that is what you want. Working in high performance application design? You need C++. Graphics? Take a look at OpenGL or Java3d.
    The most promising section to build a company? If there was a straight answer to that 1000 companies would have sprung up already and filled the niche.
    Basically, if you want a successful career in programming, don't become a java programmer, become a programmer full stop. If you think you'll be working with java when you retire in 40-odd years you're mistaken. You need to grasp the basic concepts of application and algorithm design, and be quick to learn new technologies and evaluate them against what exists already.
    It can take 3 years to go from complete newbie to fluent in a single programming language. It can then take less than 3 days to become fluent in another.

Maybe you are looking for