Why are my stills blurry?

Please help wise ones. I have a problem in my timeline, after I render my project (1 hour long), a lot of stills blurred or jumped, I have to find the original still, copy & then do a paste attributes to the ones that are in the timeline. Not all stills are blurred after rendering, please help me b/c I can't always see the flawed file until I watch the output. Has anyone had this problem? I thought it was a QT issue & updated, not it. The problems are random therefor hard to figure it out. Please help with your thoughts.
My project is using FCP6.05, I have a macbook pro, 2.16 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo processor, and OSX 10.5.6

In your Stock do you have the explanation why Apple changed the "windows resolution so you could use macbook with an external broadcast"!
No. I don't know why Apple does what they do.
MacBook and external broadcast? Not possible, not with HD anyway. DV? Firewire out from computer to camera or DV bridge, to monitor. HD? Broadcast monitoring? Get a professional computer.
It he posted that he was working in a Macbook, let´s try to help him with other "could be" problems!
That IS the problem. I just addressed WHY it looks pixelated. Because FCP doesn't present the footage full quality in the Canvas...so you can get more RT and less (none hopefully) dropped frames. Want to know what it REALLY looks like? Need the pro gear and the proper monitoring. Can't even use the MXO on the MacBooks, can you? Or is there some adapter to get DVI out? IF so, that is the solution.
Shane

Similar Messages

Why are you still selling iphone 4 when it dont work in your hand tryed a rubber sleeve and still no signal in my hand.

why are you still selling iphone 4 when it dont work in your hand tryed a rubber sleeve and still no signal in my hand.i think they should all be called back or given the iphone 5 free in its place.

http://www.heise.de/mac-and-i/kolumnen/artikel/Die-geheimnisvolle-iPhone-Energie -1226682.html?view=zoom;zoom=1
Step 1: take an empty glass, put the iphone into the glass as shown in the picture.
Step 2: stare in disbelief about this BS really helping

Why are my pics blurry

Why are my pics that I take on my iPad blurry is there anything I can do to fix that

Without Noise Reduction
http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee374/Diavonex/Album%202/ada69abb1c189c28f74 f160f98904d3e.jpg
WIth Noise Reduction
http://i1224.photobucket.com/albums/ee374/Diavonex/Album%202/b720709c4c09fa7a7a5 f7657677fcb4e.jpg

Why are my images blurry when I save my doc as a pdf?

I have Microsoft Word 2007. I am trying to save a document with a lot of images to a pdf but after I save it as a pdf...all my images are blurry? I have tried saving the images as a TIF (using Snagit) instead of a JPEG because I thought the problem was with the image. But perhaps it is with my Adobe Reader. I had a friend try fixing the pdf file from her computer and her images come out great while mine are still blurry.

Hello there,
Thanks for posting. Did you convert the file to PDF using Acrobat.com (www.acrobat.com)? If not, you may want to give it a try. That being said, it sounds as though it could also be a settings issue in Adobe Reader; unfortunately, if that's the case, I won't be able to offer much assistance. Perhaps this thread in the Adobe Acrobat forum will be of help:
http://forums.adobe.com/thread/305911
It may not be of specific help, but it may put you on the right path. Please let me know if you need additional help or information and I will do my best to elaborate.
Best regards,
Rebecca

Why are powerbooks still on apple's shelves?

why are the powerbook still being sold by Apple? Because they're emptying their shelves?
Or more interesting: Why would people buy a Powerbook?
I am just wondering because i am on the market to buy a laptop.
MBP are very expensive and Powerbook are not that cheap.
MBP or PB?
Any idea?

The Apple online store has not sold powerbooks (other than refurb's) since the various Intel laptops first appeared. And the retail store in Short Pump Va. hasn't had any powerbooks since shortly after the Intel machines hit the shelves.
In what Apple store have you seen new powerbooks for sale?
Macmall and other retailers still seem to have a few - and will have I suppose until thier inventory is gone. But, to my knowledge, Apple itself pulled them as soon as the respective Intel machine was available.

I have uninstalled, downloaded latest and installed but it still doesn't work. Why are there still files leftover even after manually removal whatever I could?

I am a Windows 8.1 user. I have followed instructions found online. But still nothing works.
McAfee is still saying Firefox is untrusted and will not run it.
I have managed to delete some folders containing Firefox but there are some still remaining.
Why?
There was never a problem before today.

Hi, [https://support.mozilla.org/en-US/kb/uninstall-firefox-from-your-computer this article] will help you to completely remove Firefox.
You should ''only'' download Firefox from [https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/ Mozilla.]
If McAfee is still not allowing it, you may need to look at the settings within McAfee.
Hope that helps.

Why are my still images Blurry when applying effects?

I am creating a slideshow video using images with up to 18mp. The images look wonderful clear and sharp until I try and add video effects to the slide, like zooming in or panning.
I am a user of both CS5.5 at work and newly acquired CS6 for home. I like what I have been able to do, however this makes me very frustrated when everything looks good except for the images with effects. Should I be applying effects differently? or what?
Thanks,
G

>Didn't mean to start an argument
= Little Devil with a Grin !!!
Stick around for awhile... there is OFTEN a good deal of "healthy discussion" (ie-disagreement) that goes on here
That discussion brings out a LOT of different experiences (you say X doesn't work... but it works just fine for "me") that sometimes, maybe even often, leads to increased and/or new knowledge for everyone
Other times, you just need to realize that what works for "me" may, or may not, work for "you" exactly the same way based on your work flow
Read what everyone offers, try what you can... and make LOTS of notes so, over time, you will develop work practices that work best for you
Personal example...
Many people export out of PPro as MPEG2-DVD to then use Encore to author a DVD
My PERSONAL work flow is to export my AVCHD edits to Widescreen DV AVI to give to Encore... so I may use Encore's Automatic Transcoding setting to make a "best" fit of video length to size (single or dual layer) of DVD
This is because I just don't care to get into all the details of figuring out the PPro settings when exporting... I let Encore do all the math for me
That process works just fine for me... other people want to figure out their own math for the PPro export settings
I say what I do, and why, but I certainly do not TELL anyone else that they MUST do it my way

Why are all images blurry

all images are blurry. ive tried everything suggested and nothing has worked.once in awhile it will be ok then back it goes.tried to reinstall still the same.

ggr wrote:
I don't know if it is okay to ask this here but... has anyone tried the generator coverflux2? When I import the images they are all blurry. Any idea why? Thanks.
Perfectly fine to ask here but you really want to talk to the people who make the filters for questions about specific filters. There's a user forum for FxFactory somewhere.
bogiesan

Why are some photos blurry on iweb?

When I drop in crisp clear photos, they instantly look blurry, especially when I use the edges to reduce or enlarge the photo - even the smallest amount.
I am using jpegs with a standard res of 640x480 - I have not encountered any problems in other applications when dropping in photos or making minor adjustments in the image size (through dragging) - why here? I am pulling the photos from ones I already have stored on my idisc (since they are already a smaller file size from the originals in my iphoto library).
Anyone have any suggestions? I would like my web site to look as polished and professional as possible and blurry photos isn't helping that goal.
Thanks,
Bob

I am getting blurry pictures too. I can't understand why. I edited the images in Photoshop, saved them as jpg's about 5X6 inches at 100 dpi, imported to iPhoto, dragged the images to my pages. Resulting images are not clear. Even after using the adjustment tool, some do not get sharp. I have tried sizing images to various sizes and resolutions without success. I have been customizing pages. Someone at Apple said that it must have something to do with the converter. I don't know. I just know that my originals are tack sharp and my pictures on iWeb leave a lot to be desired. Anyone have a cure for this? I am on an eMac running OSX 10.3.9. My work is published in B&W magazine this month and my web site has to be clear. See my web site for examples. http://www.RussAndMarciaMartin.com Some look good while others do not. If you look around, you will find blurry ones. I don't know why some are clear and others aren't.
Thanks
eMac Mac OS X (10.3.9)

Why are people still using a browser that wants to censor any views with which it does not agree?

Mozilla drives out its CEO because he contributed $1000 to support a particular law in 2008 . Then it claims it values diversity. We all know that censors like Mozilla have NO place on the Internet --so PLEASE BOYCOTT MOZILLA --please fight for what little freedom we still have to hold differing views.

Hi FirstAmendment,
Thank you for contacting Mozilla about this issue and taking the time to share your thoughts.
The decision to step down was made by Brendan. Since the moment Brendan was appointed, free and open discussion has come from a diverse spectrum of viewpoints. Mozilla is an organization that believes in openness and that no one should be persecuted for the beliefs they hold, no matter what those beliefs are. We believe in unconditional freedom and openness. That's why we support rights for everyone.
As this is the Firefox support forum I can only help with questions related to the specific product. If you need more info about Mozilla's CEO you can check the resources below:
Mozilla Blog: https://blog.mozilla.org/ <br>
Brendan Eich's Blog: https://brendaneich.com/
If you have any issues with Firefox, please post a question at [/questions/new] and someone will assist you.

Why are we still getting IEEE 1394a • VIA VT 6308P chipsets????!!!!

Why is it we are still getting redundant IEEE 1394a controllers(400mb/s) on the latest motherboards rather than the newer IEEE 1394b controllers(800mb/s)? This is stupid... the 1394b ports have been around for more than 6 months, there are many supported devices for both a and b yet if you want to do b you still need an apple mac?
Is there some sort of compatability issue with the newer IEEE 1394b controller or are the "IBM Compatible" manufacturers just too lazy/cheap/stupid to start using it??? I want answers .... I wanted to buy the new P6N Diamond (running a K9N Diamond at the moment) motherboard but am hesitant because there is no IEEE 1394b controller and i have 3 "b" devices that may as well be USB2.0 for all the use they are in conjunction with MSI motherboards... I expected more from MSI with the X-fi and everything else that is included to find that a useful and at times essential piece of technology is left out for a cheaper controller for more profit? Am I going to be forced to go to an other manufacturer for my needs or is MSI going to satisfy a loyal customer of more than 8 years? I am also the IT Manager for a medium sized building company and purchase MSI product for our work machines .... I would be saddened if I was forced to find a more suitable manufacturer due to MSI's greed?

You should probably write a letter or send an email to MSI.
This is a user to user forum, MSI does not monitor this forum...
The board I purchased (975x Powerup) is an enthusiast board, generally speaking the users that purchase them are a finicky bunch. So if a motherboard doesn't support the exact graphics or sound that they require, they find one that does. Since yours is the first post that I have seen concerning IEEE 1394b support, it doesn't look to be a high priority for most users. Also, most of the MSI boards are very reasonably priced, and don't always include the latest toys. That is probably what keeps the price for these motherboards, so low.
I may be confused about this? But I thought the P6N Diamond is an AMD Nvidia board? If it is, your may want to post your question in that section.
Anyway, as I mentioned earlier, try writing to MSI about IEEE 1394b support, maybe they can explain why there is no support for it, or let you know when they will implement support.

Why are we still dependant on Camera Raw to get Smart Objects?

I've been a professional user of both Photoshop and Lightroom since they were created and feel that I'm either missing something simple or maybe just asking too much, but can someone from the engineering team please tell me why we still have to rely on Camera Raw plugins to open the file either directly or as a Smart Object into Photoshop?
It would seem to me that Lightroom should be able to handle the round-trip conversion from Lightroom files to Photoshop Smart Objects and any future edits back in Lightroom. The only reason I can honestly see for the reliance on Camera Raw is to keep us upgrading Photoshop - something I'm sure Adobe would like us to do on a regular basis but in the current economic climate is not always possible.
I want to keep updating Lightroom to ensure the best possible conversions for my clients but don't see why I have to keep upgrading Photoshop to keep Camera Raw up to date when CS5 does everything I currently does everything I currently need. Maybe I'll be proven wrong but I'm guessing this is the way we're heading with the release of Camera Raw 7 along with Lightroom 4. Please tell me if I'm wrong!

Jason Replica wrote:
Situation 2 - Current Situation
We have Photoshop and compatible versions of Camera Raw and Lightroom installed.
I can open a raw image from Lightroom into Photoshop using the "Open in Photoshop as Smart Object" option.
This works fine but when I double-click on the Smart Object it opens back in Camera Raw for editing.
I'd always presumed that Lightroom carried out the conversion rather than Camera Raw in this situation before handing off the data to Photoshop to form the Smart Object. Have I been incorrect in my presumption?
That's where your assumption was wrong...as long as LR & ACR is in lockstep, LR hands off the image to ACR. An ACR Smart Object needs to use ACR to allow editing of the SO. That is a function of ACR and Photoshop. Lightroom can't do a SO because, well, SO's are a function of Photoshop, not Lightroom.
Jason Replica wrote:
Situation 3 - Future Situation - Maybe??
We have Photoshop and Lightroom installed.
I can open a raw image from Lightroom into Photoshop using the "Open in Photoshop as Smart Object" option.
This doesn't rely on Camera Raw to hand-off the data to Photoshop and form the Smart Object as Lightroom is capable of the same type of conversion on it's own. Double-clicking on the Smart Object should then re-open the image in Lightroom (as that's where it came from originally) and allow all the editing that we've come to expect in Lightroom.
Ain't gonna happen because Lightroom can't handle the Photoshop Smart Object SDK...and since the actual rendering of ACR/LR is the same (for the same version) it's a moot point.
Jason Replica wrote:
Ignoring the economics of having to update Photoshop as I know Adobe (and probably Jeff as well ) would like us all to be running the latest version of Photoshop and payout for the updates as soon as they come around, I would think this would be a more sensible option for the future as it would allow more people to keep their existing version of Photoshop, which they've tweaked, wrote actions for and is working very nicely at the moment thankyou while exploring the benefits of the new-and-improved Lightroom.
I really don't have a dog in this hunt–obviously, I always upgrade the moment an upgrade is available...but there are technical limitations (see above) that preclude what you think you want. As far as the economics, a $99 LR upgrade and a $199 Photoshop upgrade ever two years doesn't seem to be a huge hurdle. Add up the LR & PS upgrades and you get a cost of about $12.50/month over the 24 months...yes, it's an added cost but if you want the best user experience and usability it makes sense to keep LR & Photoshop/ACR in sync. You aren't FORCED to upgrade Photoshop...LR4 will work as far back as Photoshop CS3 (not sure about CS2). But then you are locked into the LR processed approach because older versions of ACR can't process the newer versions of LR processing controls.

Why are photos so blurry inside and so clear outside

My photos that I take inside are most of the time blurry and the ones I take outside are not. Why is this? How can I make the photos not blurry?

Generally there is more light outside so the camera can use a faster shutter speed. This makes for sharper photos. Indoors there is usually less light resulting in a slower shutter speed. Any slight camera motion will cause blur in your photos. First thing to do is make sure you are holding the phone very steady when taking pictures.

Why are apps still running?

Why is it that even after I shut off the phone and turn it back on, there are still apps in the multitasking pane? Shouldn't all of the apps have closed when the phone was shut off?

Location apps will turn themselves back on when the phone is restarted.
For further clarification, this and Google may help a bit.
http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=11763739

Why are my (still) photos pixellated when I make a slideshow in iDVD?

I have made a slideshow of (jpeg) photographic images to play on a DVD (via a TV set). However, they now seem to be playing as pixellated photos, both on my laptop and on the tv screen... it seems to have degraded the images

ink...
DVD are presently low resolution devices - NTSC is less than 640x490 pixels and your PAL discs are less than 768x576 pixels - probably 8 to 10 times lower resolution than your original digital images.
See Preparing images for DVD slideshows at http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=iDVD/6.0/en/17.html for suggestions on the still image resolution to use.
By the way, did you bring the images directly into iDVD or were they exported from iPhoto?

Why are my stills blurry?

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for