With holding tax amount in vendor line lay out

Hi Experts,
I have posted an invoice in MIRO. After posting the document when I check the wittholding tax data tab in MIRO screen the w/tax base amt (WT_QSSHB & WT_QSSHH) and Wh tax amount (WT_QBSHB & WT_QBSHH) field has no value. TDS Deducted and posted. But the same fileds has values in data entry view screen when selecting the "display withholding information" in vendor account . This problem is only for MIRO entries. Because of this i am unable to bring the WHT tax amount in vendor line layout.
Kindly advise why no wtax amount was shown in the field 'w/tax column' even if the vendor is liable to tax.
With regards
RSS.

Dear All,
this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

Similar Messages

With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001

Hi Guru's,
I have an issue, is there any impact to change the withholding tax base amount 20% instead of 10%.When I change the base amount to 20% and post a document system return error message
"With holding tax amount exceeds the cutomer/vendor line item amount 001".Guide me on this issue.
And tell me the impact of previous open item documents.
Regards
Maruthi.

Thanks for all,
MY problem solved.
Regards
Maruthi

Reg: Correction of Wrong With holding tax amount Values Posted via BAPI

Hello Experts,
I have posted some invoices using BAPI_ACC_DOCUMENT_POST with With holding tax code and amount now the thing is that ..the document is posted successfully with Wrong With hoding tax amount data in TABLE WITH_ITEM due to this while executing t-code F-53 ( Outgoing payments ) its not calculating the with holding tax amount for the invoice .
Now i wan't to correct ( Negate some values) the values in WITH_ITEM table.....
How am i going to do it..!
Plz..experts help.
Plz waiting for your input

Dear All,
this is not an error but the Standard System Design. Please read the note 611844. Only if You insert manually the WT amounts during the posting You will see them into the WT TAB after the posting. If You make the System to calculate the WT Aamounts automatically, no WT amounts will be reported into MIRO/MIR4. You can see them into the follow on document.
I hope this helps.
Mauri

Sub: Tax Combinatiom. Tax rate, tax Amount in the print lay out design of t

Dear all,
Sub: Tax Combinatiom. Tax rate, tax Amount in the print lay out design of the A/R Invoice
I have to Create a Print Lay out design of the A/R invoice for the Indain standrad please provide me some solutions for the following problems to locate the Tax combinations,Tax rate and the Tax amount in the PLD A/R Invoice ,
PACAKGE SAP B1 2005B
Need a standrad solution as per the requriment
Eg: Row Level
Tax Code created is BED+VAT
Tax combination details is
Name of Tax type   Rate
Excise                     16%
Ecess                    2%
Hcess                    1%
VAT                       4%
Row No     Item Qty   UnitPrice Tax code Total(LC)    Tax Amount
1             X      10     10000      BED+VAT   100000      21139
                                         (Excise =16000,Ecess=320, Hcess=160, VAT=4659)
2              Y      5      20000      BED+VAT    200000       42278
                                        (Excise =32000,Ecess=640, Hcess=320, VAT=9318)
In Print Lay out Design Requried is the deatils of Tax code combination , Rate and the Tax Amount in the followig way
Excise    16%   =48000
Ecess     2%    =960
Hcess     1%    =480
VAT       4%    =13977
Please send the feedback as early as possible urgently requried
for the further details send the feedback
Reagrds
Mr.Chitrasen

Hi experts,
       Pls anybody have an answer to my question, i'll be very thankfull to u,
                 I wanted to display the Tax Break ups in Invoice say,
ECess            25
Vat                 56
Excise duty    32
I've tried a lot with many of the SAP Forum thread but the results is not satisfactory..am using SAP Business One 2007 b
pls anybody who can guide me with step by step PLD creation for this problem.
I done the below steps in PLD
In Repetitive area 1
Field_1: Table-> OSTA
              Column-> Type
Field_2 : Table-> OSTA
              Column -> Code
Field_3: Table-> OSTA
              Column-> Rate
Field_4: Table-> OSTA
              Column-> Name
Field_5: Table-> A/R Invoice Tax amount per document
                Column-> Tax amount
Field_6 : Table-> A/R Invoice Tax amount per document
                Column-> Base amount
Field_7 : Formula -> Field_6 * Field_8
Field_8 :   Formula-> Field_1==1
      NOW I SORTED REPETITVE AREA 1 WITH 'SALES TAX AUTHORITIES;cODE' AND TICKED THE CHECK BOX 'SUMMARY'
    AND MADE THIS REPETITIVE AREA INVISIBLE.
IN Repetive area footer
F_01 :    Formula->   Field_4
F_02 :    Formula->   Concat(Round(F_rate,0), '%')
F_03 :    Formula->   Round(ColSum("F_tax_amount"),2)
I grouped the Repetitive area footer as Group 1
                            here i get the result but the Tax Rows are repeating and Tax amount varies for VAT for each rows
pls help me guys...
               Thanks in advance,
               Dinesh
Edited by: Dinesh S on Dec 23, 2011 1:28 PM

Optional With holding tax for a vendor

Dear All,
I want to make the with holding tax optional during MIRO.
I have already assign the tax code in vendor master and so it automatically deduct withholding tax.
But my vendor is a supplier as well as a broker for me. So when i want to pay him Brokerage I want automatic tax deduction which is happening but when i want to pay him for the material which he supplied to me also the tax get automatically deducted.
Can any body help me on this?
Thanks & Regards,
Rakesh

Hi Milind
Appreciate your prompt response, I am looking for information on what needs to be done for implementing with holding tax for Puerto Rico, May be I was wrong when I said I could not find any links on this subject either in SAP Help or else where. What I could not find was Information specific to Puerto Rico withholding tax. We normally have lots of information on WithHolding tax in SAP help and else where on the net.
I am looking for information specific to WithHolding tax for Puerto Rico.
Regards
KIM Khan

TDS With holding tax Amount problem.

Hi,
When we are Adding AP Invoice With holdig Tax Total Amount Effecting Only Single GL Account..i.e., TDS Payable A/C
EX:
AP Invoice we added here With Withholding Tax 4,418.70
After Clicking WTax Amount Arrow it's showing Withholing Tax Table here If we click SHOW TDS Details it will show TDS Amount and Sercharge Amount ecess Amount,Hcess Amount but after Adding Outgoing payament though on Account TDS Payable A/c through Base Documet AP it's Generating Autoamtic JE Like this
Bank Cr Amount
TDS Payable Dr Amount
here Remaining ecess Amount,Hcess Amount it's not Effecting Particular ecess G/L Account,Hcess G/L A/C. it's Effecting only TDS Payable Account with total Amount.
Please Guide me how to Solve this issue ? how we can Setup TDS we are using SAP B1 PL43 2005 B and TDS 4.8 version
Regds,
Samapth Kumar Devunuri.

Read
SAP Note: 959638 Add-On TDS for Indian localization & Support Queries
[https://websmp130.sap-ag.de/sap(bD1lbiZjPTAwMQ==)/bc/bsp/spn/smb_searchnotes/display.htm?note_langu=E&note_numm=959638]
You can contact Harish or Sushanth of Citixsys at the following email Id:
harish.kumar(at)citixsys.com
sushant.mohanthy(at)citixsys.com

Calculation of With Holding Tax amount

Hi,
We are using the WHT which has the Minimum amount limit as 700 at the Paying document,
The issue is
there is a Paying document which clears 4 MM Invoices (Documents are coming from MIRO)
2 MM Invoice with less than 700 amount and other 2 MM Invoice with more than 700 amount,
the system is calculating the WHT for only 2 documents which are having amount less that 700 while the payment document is generated.
Can any one please suggest whether the WHT should be calculated for only 2 which have amount more than 700
OR it will get deducted for all the 4 MM as the Total of the paying document is more that 700.
Note : The Accumlation type in the WHT is No accumlation.
Looking for a positive riposte.
Thanks
Manish

It has to calculate for 2 docs more than 700 if you select no accumulation & "Minimum Check" Min base amount check at doc invoice level

How to caculate with holding tax using vendor number

Dear All,
I need to calculate and simulate the with holding tax amount before the FI document post. input should be the vendor number fisical year and the company code and the with hoding tax base abount. plz help me to do this
regard
nawa

Hello,
For a record in BBSEG you can have multiple records in the data file which corresponds to Structure BWITH which allows more than one value for field WT_WITHCD. For ex:
BBKPF
Field1      Field2
a     bb
x     yy
BBSEG
Field1      Field2     Field3
a     bb     ccc
x     yy     zzz
BWITH
Field1      Field2     Field3     WT_WITHCD
a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD1
a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD2
a     bb     ccc     WT_WITHCD3
x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD7
x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD8
x     yy     zzz     WT_WITHCD9
Hope this gives you some help to proceed further.
Best Regards, Murugesh AS

Calculation of with holding tax

The requirement goes like this.
We have to first remove the with holding tax data from the vendor master.
And created 1 KR(amount : 1000) & 1 RE(amount : 2000) document type.Also we posted both the above invoice documents in one Z1 clearing document.
Then add the with holding tax information in vendor master.
Then we executed the report RFWT0020 for that vendor and the document number.Its updating WITH_ITEM table with only the KR total(1000) under WT_QSSHH field.Its not considering RE total.
I debugged the program RFWT0020 and found a function module FI_WT_GET_P_WITH_ITEM which performs the with holding tax calculation.When i checked the function module,its fetching from global memory.
Is there any user exit or BADI for this.We are using 4.7 version.
Please suggest how can i update the correct with holding tax amount in WITH_ITEM table.

Hi,
i´ve used this badi for MM (incoming invoices):
MRM_WT_SPLIT_UPDATE
Best regards.

Change With Holding Tac code in Vendor Master in Mass

Hi Experts,
How I can change With Holding Tax code in Vendor master in Mass. Please let me know which transaction code or path I use.
Thanks & Regards,
Hemant Maurya

Hi :
There should be a couple of ways to finish it,and the easiest way is to execute transaction xk99,and then select the table lfbw,then click field tab,then look for W/tax code (LFBW-WT_WITHCD),then execute,here you need to input the vendor numbers and then you will go the screen to enter the new value to cover the old one,
Another way is to lsmw.

DOUBT IN CIN (WITH HOLDING TAX TDS)

Payment occured first and Invoice occured afterwards. Now my question how to configure the system for calculation of with holding tax amount.

Hi Prasana,
In the TDS configuration, Define Withholding Tax Types You have to put a tick in the "Per Year, Starting with Month" accumulation type & enter the starting month.
Next in the define witholding tax code you have to put a tick in the box "wtax form" in the calculation Tab.
Next in the define formulas for calculating withholding tax you have to enter the formulas for calculating tax as follows:
To base Amount, Witholding Tax Rate etc. can be maintained.
Hope this helps.
Regards,
AVD.

With holding tax base amount for 1099 vendors with discounted payment term

Hi Friends,
We have a below situation for 1099 vendors,
Some of the 1099 vendors are set-up in the system with payment term with discounts i.e. 2% if paid within 10 days
As per config, system posts with holding tax base amount at the time of posting payment.
With holding tax rate is 0%,
Based on modified net amount calculation
and
Cash discount calculation before w/tax calculation
When we have vendor with input tax, system excludes tax amount at the time of payment but for the with holding tax base calculation amount system does not exclude input tax type.
Which causes difference in 1099 misc vendors
Below is the example of how system calculates the amount.
Invoice $ 1000, payment term 2% if paid within 10 days. Input tax 7.25%
Payment going out=
$1000- $ 72.5(tax 7.25%) = $ 927.5 18.55 [2% discount] = $ 908.95 (payment amount)
With holding base calculation =
$ 1000 100 (2% discount) = $ 900
Difference between payment going out and with holding tax base = 908.98 900 = 8.98
Can some one please tell me how to get rid off this difference?
Moreover, please tell me if its normal to have 1099 vendors with discounted payment term.
Any thoughts on above situation will be helpful
Edited by: Shefford William on Jan 28, 2008 11:36 PM

Dear All
i am also having the same problem. The example is
Net invoice Value   = $ 100,000
Input Tax @ 15%   = $ 15,000
Total Invoice Value = $ 115,000
Cash Discount = 20% with in 20 days
On payment the system behavior should be
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,325 ( 3.5% of 95,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $20,000)
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,675 ( Inv value - Cash Dic - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3325 = 91,675)
However at the time of payment system is calculating tax as follows
Debit Vendor invoice Value   = $ 115,000
Debit Cash Discount @ 20%    = $   20,000   ( 20% of the Net Invoice Value that is 20% of $ 100,000)
Credit W/H Tax deduction @ 3.5% = $ 3,220 ( 3.5% of 92,000 the Inv Value - Cash Discount that is $ 115,000 - $23,000. This $ 23,000 is only calculated for W/H tax calculation that is 20% of $ 115,000 )
Credit Bank Account = $ 91,780 ( Inv value - Cash Dis - W/H tax that is $ 115,000 - 20,000 - 3220 = 91,780)
this is not the common practice when using the net base value in the system.
Can any one help me in this regard. I really have been stucked in this problem for many days
Regards
Bilal Athar

With holding tax base amount is not showing in miro screen

Dear All
Whith holding tax amount is not showing in withholding tax tab after all posting also.
but with holding tax posting is going on fine. in miro screen in withholding tax tab i am not getting this value correctly but it is showing 0 value.
help me in this regard.
Regrds,
Sami

Dear Sami,
if the WT datas are zero in MIRO/MIR4 this is due to the Standard System Design. Usually You will have the correct WT data only into the FI follow on document. Only if You insert WT datas manually (wt base amount, wt amount) these will be saved into MIRO/MIR4 as well.
I hope this helps in understanding the System behaviour.
Have a nice day.
Mauri
Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM
Edited by: MAURIZIO BIANCOTTI on Oct 26, 2009 2:22 PM

Change with holding tax for vendor

Hi all,
I have a requirement of chnaging withholding tax for exisitng vendor. Is it possible to achive this using any function module or BAPI and ateast by BDC or LSMW ??
Best suggestions will be rewarded with points.
Sivaprasad

Hi Sivaprsad,
You can change the with holding tax data by using BDC. because, it having table control, so it's easy to update code in BDC.
Hope, it will help you.
Thanks,
Poonam.

India -With Holding Tax - Changes As per the Budget Approval

Dear All
Many of you are aware, there will not be any surcharge, education & higher education cess for with holding tax in Indai from 01.10.2009.
Our client is operating seperate tax codes for Basic Duty, Surcharge and Education Cess. We have change the configuration and maintained 0% in the formula for calculating with holding tax for surcharge and education cessand we have maintained with the validity from 01.10.2009
(ie., The above solution we thought because, we wish to maintain the same tax code and with out modifying the vendor master)
Now, the system is working fine for all the scenarios, except the transfer of the old advances from special gl indicator to normal line item through T.Code (F-54). Under this T-code, the system is reversing only basic duty at old rates with out surcharge and cess.
Kindly suggest the solution to reverse the surcharge and cess while doing F-54 with the posting dates as 01.10.2009 onwards
Regards
Anilkumar

Please go through the SAP note 1359268 for budget changes
also see the 1369775,1371380,1372734 for your exact requirement

With holding tax amount in vendor line lay out

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for