Workflow: Auto forward for next level for decision with object (RFQ)

Hi all,
I have the same requirement as the one in this post but for RFQ approval instead of PO
Workflow -Auto forward for next level for decision with object (PR)
I have tried deadline monitoring, but I need to capture the level in which the RFQ is in order to escalate.
Can someone let me know how to proceed further.
Regards,
nsp.

Hi Aamir,
As you said we have to use deadline monitoring here.
For this case use 'Requested Start'. From your i came to know this workitem should be a dialog workitem, so the workflow will wait for the time what you have specified in the requested start and when it is reached it places the workitem in the corresponding recipient inbox.
Regards
Balaji E.

Similar Messages

  • Workflow -Auto forward for next level for decision with object (PR)

    Dear All,
    I am working on PR release through workflow, with three level release codes. I need your help in setting:-
    Example:
    In case PR received through workflow at 1st level for release code Z1, and if he could not able to release it within 5 Min, PR/task should be automatically forwarded to next 2nd level for release code Z2.
    And in case 2nd level do not release within 10 Min, PR/task should be farwarded to 3rd level for decision
    etc etc
    It is some thing with lastet End, Request Start, Latest Start & Request End , but could not able to understand how to work with them in case of above situation.
    Any tips/link/document would be great for me?
    Regards
    Aamir

    Hi Aamir,
    As you said we have to use deadline monitoring here.
    For this case use 'Requested Start'. From your i came to know this workitem should be a dialog workitem, so the workflow will wait for the time what you have specified in the requested start and when it is reached it places the workitem in the corresponding recipient inbox.
    Regards
    Balaji E.

  • Workflow not move to next level approver...

    Hi Friends,
                           I have developed workflow for appraisal. Employee enter his appraisal ratings and submit  and then first,second,third level approvers enter their ratings one after another submit.
                            whenever one level approver submit,i have updated th status in our customized table and pass the status to workflow method through Set Parameter command. For example ,when employee enter his rating and once submit, i have update the status field in table with value 'Pending with First Approver' and pass the status 'pending with first approver' through Set Parameter command to workflow method. In workflow methods , I receive status value using Get Parameter command and based on tht value respective workflow item will moved to inbox of First level approver.
                      Its working fine. But  SOME TIMES status updated in table properly and workflow item keep retain in same level inbox even after submit successfully,instead of move to next level approer.
                      For example, once employee submit his appraisal rating,status 'pending with first level approver' updated in table properly. But workflow item still keep retain in employee inbox only and first level approver do not receive workflow item in his inbox.  I  tried to refresh that variable which i used in set parameter/get parameter command . but same proble continue.Could you please suggest me what will be reason for this issue?. Thank you.
    Regards,
    Hockteck..

    Hi Rick,
                           Thanks for your response. I am using Z table for reporting purpose. In Z table I update status like 'pending with employee','pending with first approver',etc. If the end users wants to know the status of apprisal for a particular employee,they can use this report and react according to the updated status.
                                               I have mentioned in this thread about  both this Z table update and pass status using set parameter id, because both these statment executed after employee or approvers submit. But Z table updated successfully and set parameter not passed successfully.
                         In my workflow I am using Loop step and this loop will continue to run  till the status become 'Completed'. when third level approver submit his appraisal details that time i pass the status 'Completed' to complete the workflow .For employee,first and second level approvers I pass the status like 'Pending with Employee','Pending with First','Pending with Second'.
                       Whenever I pass the status to workflow,using Function Module i find the next level approver based on the status. For example If the status is 'Pending with First' then in the function module I find the first level approver and pass his UserId as current agent name. Whenever this issue happen I debug and check the current agent id . But it shows only Employee ID.If the status 'Pending with First' passed to workflow properly then FM could have pass the First level approver ID. But since current agent id shows Employee Id, workflow keep exist in Employee inbox ,even after he submit successfully.
                         If 10 employees submit his apprisal ratings,for one or two employees this issue happen and for rest of the emplyess workflow completed successfully with all  approvers submissions. Any suggestions?.
    Regards,
    Hockteck.

  • Requestes are not forwarded to next level after approval

    Hi all,
    Apps version 11.5.10, Solaris 10
    we have modified a user name in apps after that what ever that particular user has approved is not going to next level. Is it not recommended to update a user name?
    Hope some one can help me fix the issue
    Thanks in advance
    uns

    Hi Bob,
    I am running AE 5.2 but do not use the "forward" feature. For request that require "role approvers" I have set up a seperate initiaor that includes the additional Stage for Role approval.
    I have initiators for 1) New User w/ no role approval 2) New User w/ role approval 3) Change User w/ no role approval 4) Change User w/ no role approval
    My "no role approvals" go through three stages 1) security initial review 2) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning; my "role approvals" go through four stages 1) security initial review 2) Role Approval Stage 3) Internal Control review 3) Final security provisioning
    If a request has roles that require approval and some that do not, the request will take the two seperate paths based on the roles defined for each; the provisoning will complete once both paths have completed all stages
    This allows us to treat the role approval just like any stage with assigned approvers and if multiple approvers allow for any one approver to complete the stage
    This is different from your approach of forwarding for role approval; I define the roles to the initialtors that require role approval, but gives you another perspective of doing it
    Jerry Synoga
    Ryerson,Inc.
    630-758-2021

  • Auto Forward to next field?

    I have had this program for a very short time and have created my
    first form. On the form I am requesting an account # that is between
    6 and 7 digits using a total of 7 text fields to separate each
    character in the account #.
    Is there a way to have the cursor automatically tab or forward to the
    next field after the maximum of 1 character is added to each field?

    Rather than using 7 separate fields I recommend using a single field that has a max size of 7 digits and set a comb. The comb will be applied after you enter your info and then the comb will appear.

  • Auto PO for Services with ME59N

    Hi
    I have done following settings.
    1) Auto PO marked in Vendor master
    2)SproMMExternal Services ManagementSource Determination and Default Valuesfor Purchasing Organizations-Auto Po generation for service requitions.
    3)PR created with Item cat --D and account assignment cat K with material group as input data.
    no material number
    4)Info record created for material group and vendor.
    5)Source assigned to PR via T code ME56
    still iam facing issue When i go ME59N   "please maintain service or limit"

    Hi There
    in the PR in change mode(Me52n) maintain the limits ( in Line item details- Tab Limits,Overall Limit and Expected value)
    and then try to convert through Me59n
    It will work
    Thanks
    Senthil

  • Workflow is not moving next level approver

    Dear all,
    We are in the upgrade from 4.6c to ECC 6.0. When I am executing the workflow it is going successfully to the first approver, depends up on the decision of the approver it should process any one of the four braches. But here my problem  it is not perocessing the approve branch after approval of request.
    It is working fine in 4.6c.
    Please help me.
    Thanks and Regards,
    Ravi

    helpme please

  • Need Help for Array with Object

    hey there guys... am trying to complete my project which is to create a Library System. Was able to create a list to show the books available when they select the book and click a borrow button it can print out the book.
    what problem i have now is that when a student click borrow... the value how can i transfer to an array inside the object student.
    i am usin a main screen (ms) who is controlling all the functions. been trying and trying on this for very long hopefully there will be those who are able to help me out.
    my customer screen would be like this... but how can i add in the array for books borrowed
    import javax.swing.*;
    class Customer
         private String name;
         private int accNo;
         private String password;
         private double balance;
         private Books borrow[]=new Books[5];
         int borrowCount=0;
         static int customerCount=0;
         private MainScreen ms;
         Customer(String n, int no, String p, double b)
              name=n;
              accNo=no;
              password=p;
              balance=b;
              customerCount++;
              JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,name +" record created");
              display();
    /* Trying to Create the Array to store information
         public void setStudentBorrow(String a)
              borrow[borrowCount]=a;
              borrowCount++;
              JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,"Book Borrowed");
         public String getStudentBorrow()
              for(int i=0;i<borrowCount-1;i++)
              {     return borrow;     }
         public String getPassword()
         {     return password;     }
         public String getName()
         {     return name;          }
         public int getAccNo()
         {     return accNo;     }
         public double getBalance()
         {     return balance;     }
         public void setName(String n)
         {     name=n;     }
         public void setPassword(String p)
         {     password=p;     }
         public void setBalance(double b)
         {     balance=b;     }
         public void setAccNo(int no)
         {     accNo=no;     }
         public void display()
              JOptionPane.showMessageDialog(null,
              "\nCutomer Number : "+ customerCount+
              "\nName :"+name+
              "\nAccount Number: "+accNo+
              "\nBalance (RM): "+balance,"Customer record",
              JOptionPane.INFORMATION_MESSAGE     );

    Cross Post:
    http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=779224&messageID=4433689#4433689

  • Error While Promoting the Numbers to Next Level

    We have hierarchy defined for entities in Hyperion and are using Phased submissions under Process control . We have all the immediate child entities at 'SUBMITTED' phase but when we are promoting the Parent entity to 'SUBMITTED' phase we are getting following error
    "Cannot promote a process unit to a level higher than any of its direct dependents."
    I know that a parent can be promoted only to a level that is less than or equal to the lowest level of its immediate children.
    However we have few of the Entities which are at "NO ACCESS" stage or "Not Started" stage so if this affecting the Parent from promoting to next stage. But these entities are not started only and the Parent Entity has already been promoted from Not Started to "First Pass" stage that point of time no error crept in.
    Please let me know the probable cause of the error.
    Regards
    Rahul
    Edited by: rj_700 on Jun 9, 2012 11:35 AM

    Hi Rahul ,
    I am a learner.
    As per my Knowledge.
    When we have issues about Phased Submission- Process Control there are certain things which are worth making note of.
    1. Validation Accounts ,which might be preventing you from Promoting the Phase to the next level.
    2.And Before promoting the submission group to the Next Phase, make sure all your child members have passed all the review levels to be promoted to next level
    please check with experts if my reply is inappropriate.
    Thanks,
    David

  • Object type for incoming payments object

    Dear All,
    I need to write the transaction notification for incoming payment documents, but I am unable to find out the object type for incoming payments object.
    I have checked the object type 24 (receipts), but it is not for incoming payments. Any idea??
    Thanks in advance..
    Suresh Yerra.

    Hello,
    Generally try this in the transaction notification (this logs every call of transaction notification)
    if not exists (select * from sysobjects where name = 'T_TransactionNotification')
    begin  
         create table T_TransactionNotification(
         TransactionDate datetime,
         ObjectType nvarchar(20),
         TransactionType nchar(1),
         NumOfColsInKey int,
         ListOfKeyColsTabDel nvarchar(255),
         ListOfColsValTabDel nvarchar(255) );
    end;
    insert into T_TransactionNotification
    (     TransactionDate,
         ObjectType,
         TransactionType,
         NumOfColsInKey,
         ListOfKeyColsTabDel,
         ListOfColsValTabDel)
    values( getdate(),
              @object_type,
              @transaction_type,
              @num_of_cols_in_key,
              @list_of_key_cols_tab_del,
              @list_of_cols_val_tab_del);
    then issue a  incoming payment  (i have payed a invoice with bank transfer)
    you will see the following
    2010-01-20 14:45:20.907     24     A     1     DocEntry     2010390001
    2010-01-20 14:45:20.903     321     A     1     ReconNum     1838
    2 records will be inserted
    - 1st for payment with object type 24
    - 2nd for reconsiliation of invoice and payment i have payed in this example.
    Regards,
    J.
    Edited by: János Nagy on Jan 20, 2010 2:45 PM

  • Workflow PR-Next level pop-up for release

    Dear All,
    I am working on PR release through workflow, with three level release codes. I need your help in setting:-
    Example:
    In case PR received through workflow at 1st level for release code Z1, and if he could not able to release it within 5 Min, PR/task should be forwarded to next 2nd level for release Z2.
    And in case 2nd level do not release within 10 Min, PR/task should be farwarded to 3rd level for decision
    etc etc
    It is some thing with lastet End, Request Start, Latest Start & Request End , but could not able to understand how to work with them in case of above situation.
    Any tips/link/document would be great for me?
    Regards
    Aamir

    Hi Ratnakar,
    i have facing same issue with workflow outlook mail notification..
    plz give me u r number and mail id.
    u r staying in Andrapradesh.
    Regards
    Srinivas

  • I have a workflow transaction which got timeout and escalated to the next level. The comments in the approver's notes are just changed by the system in doing so.  For eg: "Moving John under Michael" gets changed into "Moving+John+under+Michael" during the

    I have a workflow transaction which got timeout and escalated to the next level. The comments in the approver's notes are just changed by the system in doing so.
    For eg: "Moving John under Michael" gets changed into "Moving+John+under+Michael" during the timeout/reminder notification. Any idea ?
    -Thanks,
    Arun

    I have recently started having this problem in PSE8. The Adobe workaround
    did work, but I don't fancy having to re register each time I use it.
    What I have discovered is that it's nothing to do with the image metadata as it occurs before any image is opened.
    It SEEMS to only occur if you use file/open with to open an image in the editor - IE start PSE with that command.
    If you close elements down, and start it using programs/PSE/Elements (or your desktop shortcut) - the panorama feature magically works.
    Each time I've opened the editor 'automatically' using image/open with, it seems to create the problem.
    Hope this helps

  • Auto forwarding option for a substitute

    Hi ,
      Can somebody help me the workflow automatic forwarding option works with substitutes.
      USER A is a substitute for for USER B and both users are setup for automatic forwarding
      to external outlook e-mail address.
      When a workitem sent to USER B , it showed up in USER A inbox.
      But the external e-mail sent to only main user ( USER B ) , but not the substitution.
      Anybody has a clue about auto forwarding works with substitute ?
    Thanks in Advance.

    Thanks for your answers...
    Outlook/ Substitute setup is working fine ..
    both main user and substitute are maintained with external e-mail address and autoforwarding option.
    Only main user is receiving e-mail. Substitute is receiving the work item in his inbox..but not outlook mail.. 
    If Is end a work item directly to substitute , he gets the outlook e-mail.

  • Terrible Customer support, I upgraded my account they took the money and nothing works.  I have done chat support and was told they were levating to the next level of support and have heard nothing.  I have been on hold on the phone for over an hour.

    I upgraded my account yesterday. They charged my card and nothing works,  I was on with online chat support for a hour last night. I was told they were levating my support to the next level.  Never heard back from anyone  I have been on hold for over an hour on phone support. 
    This is really awefull way to treat your customers.

    Unless an employee stops by this forum and reads your message, you need to know...
    This is an open forum, not Adobe support... you need Adobe support
    Adobe contact information - http://helpx.adobe.com/contact.html may help
    -Select your product and what you need help with
    -Click on the blue box "Still need help? Contact us"

  • The next level manager is unable to view or access appraisal forms for all

    I am facing an issue where in the next level manager is not able to see the appraisal docs of employees.
    Follwing is the link that we found on SDN related to the same issue-
    Next higher level manager should see the appraisal docs of the employees
    During the PM testing, an issue was discovered with the existing logic of the ‘Default Next Level Manager’ BADI.
    When a manager manually reports to a NL manager’s organization unit, the next level manager is unable to view or access appraisal forms for all the employees who report to the manager.
    For example,
    NL Manager/Cheif: Susan
    Manager/Chief: John
    Employees: Mary and Matt
    If John’s position (manager/chief) has a “A 999 Reports to dotted line” relationship to Susan’s organization unit (NL Manager), then Susan is unable to access, approve or reject the appraisal forms for Mary and Matt (John’s direct reports).
    The relationship type is A 999 – Reports to dotted line
    Type of related object – O (Organizational Unit)
    We need to update the BADI in order for the next level manager to be able to access appraisal forms as described in the example above.
    BADI implementation Name : Z_HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DO
    Method - IF_EX_HRHAP00_DOC_DEF_DO~DEFAULT_OTHERS
    Now we are facing the following issue-
    After identification of the employees who report to the manager’s organizational unit using the  A 003 – ‘Belongs to” relationship we are not sure how to pass these employees information from BADI to appraisal form, so that the previously identified Next Level Manager will be able to access, accept and reject appraisal forms for these employees.
    For further details please refer the thread. I was not able to understand how this can be achieved.
    Can anyone please mention in brief how I should be able to do this. I am new to this and I would appreciate any help .
    Regards,
    Satish.

    There are no Function Modules to my knowledge. Pls try the transaction S_AHR_61016530 which would display the User's approvers as per hierarchy. This would bring datas from the HR tables. If this helps pls award points.

Maybe you are looking for