Workflow on invoice parking and posting

Hello,
Can anybody guide me how to configure the workflow for invoice parking and posting in detaills?
Thanks
Nilesh

hello ,
Prerequisites
In the Implementation Guide (IMG) for Logistics Invoice Verification, you can specify for which company code, which vendors, which invoices, and above which amount a document is subject to release. In an invoice document that is completed for posting, the amount that is subject to release is based on the gross amount. (Logistics Invoice Verification ® Document Parking ® Define Release Criteria)
Technical Implementation (MM-IV-LIV)
Object Types
Object technology is used to create the interface between the ERP functions and the Workflow system. The information given below is primarily of a technical nature and is not necessary for an initial overview.
Incoming invoice
Object type Bus2081 (Incoming invoice)
Workflow Template
The actual operational procedure is implemented as a workflow template. You will find this workflow template in your ERP system.
Workflow template: WS 20001004
Description: Release the Completed Log. IV Document
Triggering Event for Workflow Template
The event for workflow template IncomingInvoice.CompletedToRelease is triggered if the parked document is complete for posting (RBKP-RBSTAT='B') and is subject to release (RBKP-RFGKZ='X').
This coupling between the event and the workflow template to be started is deactivated in the standard system. If you want to use the workflow template, you have to activate it in Customizing for Logistics Invoice Verification.
User Roles
You complete parked invoices for posting and release them at the following organizational levels.
Processor Determination: Clerk Responsible for Releasing Invoices
If you have already maintained an organizational unit, you can use it here.
If no organization unit is available, create an organizational unit that includes the people responsible for releasing invoice documents that are complete for posting.
Use the organizational unit in Customizing for Logistics Invoice Verification in the activity for defining release criteria.
Processor Determination: Clerk Responsible for Completing Invoices for Posting
If you have already maintained an organizational unit, you can use it here.
If no organization unit is available, create an organizational unit that includes the people responsible for completing parked invoice documents for posting.
Link the organizational unit to the single-step task TS20000879:
·        By simple processor assignment
All users in the organizational unit receive the work item.
·        By defining an individual role
Only selected users in the organizational unit receive the work item.
Authorization Objects
You must have maintained the authorization to display invoices (activity 03, M_RECH_WRK) for users who are responsible for releasing invoices.
You must have maintained authorization to change parked invoice documents (activity 77, M_RECH_WRK) for users who are to complete parked invoice documents for posting.
Several other specific customizing steps are necessary for this workflow template in addition to the general customizing that is necessary to make sure that the workflow system functions properly.
Activating Event-Receiver Linkage
The event IncomingInvoice.CompletedToRelease (Invoice document completed for posting and subject to release) for object type BUS2081 (Incoming invoice) is an event that triggers workflow template WS 20001004 and is entered in the event linkage table as such as the standard event.
This coupling between the event and the workflow template to be started is deactivated in the standard system. If you want to use the workflow template, you activate the linkage between the triggering event and the workflow template as receiver of the event in Customizing for Logistics Invoice Verification. (Logistics Invoice Verification ® Document Parking ® Activate Workflow Template for Release for Posting.)
Use
The release of invoice documents that have been completed for posting is supported by a link to a workflow procedure.
Prerequisites
The event IncomingInvoice.CompletedToRelease must be triggered for an invoice (BUS2081) so that a release procedure is started. We recommend implementing this workflow together with the SAP workflow template WS20001003.
In Customizing for Logistics Invoice Verification, you maintain the activity Define Release Criteria under Document Parking.
Features
Release for Posting
In the release step, the person responsible for releasing the invoice document decides if it should be released. The system uses the virtual attribute ReleaseAgent for object type BUS2081 to determine the person responsible for releasing the document. The release criteria in Customizing for Logistics Invoice Verification are checked for this.
If the person responsible decides to release the document, it is first released in the background and then posted.
If he or she decided to reject the document, it is forwarded for further processing to the accounts payable clerk responsible for completing invoice documents for posting. The rejection reason should have been entered using the memo function.
Completing Invoices for Posting
The accounts payable receives a work item in his or her inbox. In this work item, he or she can read the reason why the invoice document was rejected and change it. If the accounts payable clerk parks the changed invoice document, saves it as complete, deletes it, or posts it, the workflow ends. It makes sense to save the invoice document as complete and therefore trigger the release workflow again, assuming that the invoice document is subject to release.
If the invoice document is parked, deleted, posted, or released in the background outside the workflow process, the workflow ends.
regards
venga

Similar Messages

  • Invoice parking and posting

    Hi all,
    I want to know the functionality of Invoice Parking and Invoice Posting. Can anyone explain me this concept?
    Also, what is the use of the BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_PARK and
                                                 BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE function modules
    and what are all the inputs need to be passed to this FM in order to create invoice?
    If the invoice document is created or parked, then which table field will differentiate the parking status and Posting status? And in which transaction i can see the invoice number created (parked/psoted) against the correspoding Purchase order and PO item number?
    Regards,
    Shanthi

    Hi
    Invoice which is still incomplete can be parked, then changes can be done to complete it. Finally completed document can be posted. You can use MIRO for these three functionalitites and also MIR7 for parking and completing the invoice document. Unless you post the the document complete accounting entries will not be generated.
    You can check RBKP table with data element RBSTAT for knowing the status of invoice.
    The use of BAPIs:
    BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_PARK:
    Park invoices with multiple account assignment
    Change and park invoice account assignments
    Park invoices for blanket purchase orders (see also the documentation for the function module BAPI_INCOMINGINVOICE_CREATE
    Park invoices for purchase orders with planned delivery costs
    Park invoices with unplanned delivery costs
    Park subsequent credits and debits
    Use document types with external number assignment
    Park invoices with withholding tax
    Park invoices with several creditor lines and different methods and terms of payment
    Park invoices for purchase orders for external services
    Park invoices with G/L account postings
    Park invoices with material account postings
    Park invoices for a one-time vendor
    Park invoices with a different payee
    Thanks

  • FV65 - WorkFlow Implementation for parking and posting invoices

    Hi All,
        We are implemetnig workflow for vendor invoices. can anyone implemented this for FV65 can help us which workflow template to use and what are the configuration settings for this.
    Regards
    Purna

    Hi:
    Refer to this documentation.
    http://help.sap.com/printdocu/core/Print46c/en/data/pdf/BCBMTWFMMM/BCBMTWFMMM.pdf
    Please let me know if you need more information.
    Assign points if useful.
    Regards
    MSReddy

  • Security Segregating Park and Posting Vendor invoices

    I'm working to create a role that allows a user to create & park but not post an invoice. The objects that I would think should be checked are not  and if I give access to create for F_BKPF_BUK  and F_FAGL_SEG it allows parking and posting.
    I don't really understand why object F_BKPF_BLA isn't restricting it when it has values for create, change and post (post not being checked it appears).
    Any suggestions? the role I've created for parking is using trxns: F-42 and F-63.

    Obviously from a SOD standpoint you need to split the park and post functions.  What I have done in the past is to use primarily F-47 and F-63 in the Park Role and have 77 (pre-enter) as the value for the F_BKPF* objects.  Make good use of SU22 or SU24 (though these are not always 100% correct) to help you determine the correct values and sometimes you need to "right-click" on the activity box then select "more values"

  • FICO-Invoice Parking and approval; Unable to complete some Config steps

    FICO-Invoice Parking and approval; Unable to complete some Config steps
    I am using standard WF: WS10000051 (SAP template) in Accounts payable to get triggered for Invoice Parking-Approval and Posting.
    One of the steps mentioned at help.sap.com is below;
    1. Data for Event Linkage
    Object type     FIPP
    Event     CREATED
    Receiver type     WS10000051
    Receiver module     SWW_WI_CREATE_VIA_EVENT
    2. Check Function
    Receiver type (function module)     
    Global     X
    Enabled     X
    I could get to 1. Data for Event Linkage which is T Code SWETYPV but could not find 2. Check Function.
    Where do I set the parameters for :  2. Check Function in SAP
    The help file link is
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp2005/helpdata/en/01/a9ceb5455711d182b40000e829fbfe/content.htm
    Regards
    Nilabh

    You dont need to assign the Check function module.
    Check function module is used to prevent the workflow from triggering if the checks written in the function fail.
    For eg. check if the invoice amount is GT 500. If yes trigger workflow else dont.
    -Kiran

  • Park and Post for Down Payment Request (F-47)

    SAP Gurus,
    We are having requirement for park and post in Down Payment Request (F-47). So that it is approved by an authoriser.
    Hence, Is it possible to workflow a down payment request to an authoriser for approval
    Please share with me options available for this Down payment request
    Regards,
    Raj

    Hi Raj,
    Please check with your workflow consultant. Anyway, I'd like to share with you how to know whether there is a standard workflow for application component in question. T-Code SWDD -> Workflow -. Other Workflow/Version. Then drilldown on the task field. Then choose structure search. You will find the standard workflow for each of the component. Unfortunately, there is no standard workflow for downpayment but if you have workflow consultant, they may be able to help.
    Regards
    Fauzi

  • Park and Post management review step for manual journal entries

    We are implementing SAP and want to discuss the best way to automate in SAP a high dollar/value (maybe $100K and above) "park and post" management review step for posting manual journal entries. I believe SAP does not offer dollar/value limits as standard functionality for defining a park & post process. If this correct, what have you seen from your other clients using SAP park & post? Is there a different way to get where we want without customizing a workflow or generating a new transaction set?

    Hi you could limit the authorisation for the users only to park and then a responsible person could review it and post. You can set a tolerance limit for customers and vendors.

  • Park and Post with ME22N

    Hi All -
    We are currently using ME22N to park and post a PO.
    User with just the PO Processor role is now able to post with AR Approver role
    (without the PO Approver role). The authorization objects related to
    post are being shared across different modules. These object are
    available in all the approver roles and it gives the ability for the
    user to post a PO even without a PO Approver role.
    It appears as if the F_FICA_FOG, F_FICA_FSG, F_FICB_FKR, and F_FMMD_MES
    are being shared across multiple FI modules. One role has the park
    (actvt 11) access (PO Processor) and the other role (AR Approver) has
    posting capabilities (actvt 10).
    We are leaning towards creating custom authorization objects to achieve this.  We are trying to prevent Segregation of Duty conflicts in our system.  Are there any standard was to prevent someone from posting a parked document in the purchasing module (a PO) if the person has access to post AR documents (AR Invoices)?

    We decided to have the DEV team create a custom auth object and custom table to handle this issue.  In the table there is a listing of activities, for example:
    PO1 - PO Processor Park
    PO2 - PO Approver Post
    AR1 - AR Processor Park
    AR2 - AR Processor Post
    In the PO Processor role, in the custom object, the value would be PO1, and in the AR Approver, the custom object would have AR2.  This will require a lot of testing.  I hope this helps someone in that may have this problem in the future.
    Edited by: T on Feb 10, 2011 9:43 AM

  • Regarding Parking and Posting access

    Hi All,
    The requirement for my client scenario is as follows:
    There are about 6 company codes (lets name it as AAA) which need to be isolated based on the following rule:
    Users belonging to AAA should be able to PARK as well as POST to all entities whereas Users belonging to other than AAA should not be able to POST to AAA. They should be able to POST to non AAA  only and PARK everywhere.
    Also a user who PARK's should not be able to POST.
    Options which I have tried are -
    - Created a separate role with activity 01 for the object F_SKA1_BUK and gave the AAA entities only and at the same time removed 01 activity for the same object in a separate role. The combination of these two roles gave the result as
    - Was able to PARK and POST to AAA entities using FB01 (True)
    - Was unable to post to other entities (Failed - user should have been able to)
    - The person who parked was not allowed to Post (True)
    The other combination with 01 activity to non-AAA entities and minus 01 activity to AAA entities:
    - Failed to PARK to non AAA entities (Failed - user should have been able to) failed at 01 activity
    - Was able to PARK to only non AAA. (True)
    - Was unable to POST to AAA entities (True)
    - The person who parked was not allowed to Post (True)
    I came to know that this can be achieved by creating separate roles for posting and parking Tcodes and using SOD.
    I have an already existing GL role - I removed all the posting tcodes in the original GL role so that it can allow only parking to all entities. Then I created a separate role and put all the Posting Tcodes in it and maintained the objects in the same was as they were maintained in the original GL role but here I have given only the AAA entities. Can some one help me in this approach.
    Regards
    Shakeel

    The objects designed to protect posting of accounting documents directly in FI are F_BKPF, F_SKA1 protects the Chart of Accounts maintenance by company code.
    You should generate two master roles, one with the activity 77 in all F_BKPF* Objects and other with activity 77 and 01
    The first one only lets you parking documents. The second one parking and posting too.
    Be careful with the tcodes you are going to use. The FB01 does not work if you don't have 01 in your authorizations for the F_BKPF_BUK object.
    The Tcodes for excellence for parking documents are:
    Invoices ( Vendors and Customer)
    FV60
    FV65
    FV70
    FV75
    GL Documents
    F-65
    FV50
    Regards!!

  • How to identify Parked and Posted Documents in GL Line Item Report

    Is there any way to identify parked and posted documents in GL Line Item Report S_ALR_87012282? If i tick the parked documents in the further selection tab in the selection parameter, report will list all documents (parked and posted).
    There is no available field in the layout. Is there any other way?
    Thanks!

    HI,
    The other way to know the parked document details
    use tcode: FBV3 - Display
    OR
    you can go to SE16 and enter table name VBKPF -Document Header for Document Parking
    BSTAT = V
    V = parked document
    and ececute u will get the details of parked document.
    Edited by: Manohar Mathkunti on Sep 13, 2008 11:11 AM

  • GL Park and Post Automation

    I am in process for the GL Park and Post automation from current manual process.
    Accountetn - Park
    Mgr - Post
    Mgr II - Post
    1) 50,000.99 and below will park and post without approval
    2) 50,001 to 20 M will require approval and post by next level manager
    3) 20 m and all above have to approval and 2nd level approval would require.
    4) If under scenario 2 primary level manager not available then in certain amount of time automation will trigger to next level manager for approval.
    We have Cross Company with Multiple company codes
    What test scenario i can use please help me

    Hi,
    Please do the following configuration :
    1. Define Tolerance Groups for Employees (OBA4)
    Menu Path
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Business Transactions --> Open Item Clearing --> Clearing Differences --> Define Tolerance Groups for Employees
    In that create tolerance groups
    This are the examples of tolerance groups. You can create of your own choice depending on amount.
    2. Assign to users (OB57)
    Menu Path
    IMG --> Financial Accounting (New) --> Accounts Receivable and Accounts Payable --> Business Transactions --> Open Item Clearing --> Clearing Differences --> Assign Users to Tolerance Groups
    In Username enter User ID and in Tolerance group enter Tolerance group created by you in OBA4.
    Please do not delete User ID - SMITH
    3. Give park and Post authorization. You can see user is able to park items in all cases but will be able to post only as per his / her tolerance limit.
    Hope, this solves your issue else revert.
    Regards,
    Tejas

  • IDCO for Parking and Posting of FI documents

    Hi all,
    Could you please help me the IDCO for Parking and Posting of FI documents.
    Regards
    Paul

    Hi Gomathy,
    Can you please confirm whether this IDOC is used to park or post FI documents, when I checked the documention of the IDOC it says it is used for posting , kindly confirm the same.
    Regards
    Dhanoo

  • Read parked and posting document from one FM

    Hi all,
    IS theere any FM avaliable to read parked and posting document from one function module.
    Please let me know if anything is there.
    Thanks

    Hi T,
    have u searched in SE37 with words park?,i'm sure we have few FMs which will do the same.
    regards
    Prabhu

  • Park and Post for recuring entries

    Hi,
    Can anyone tell me is it possible to have SOD in park and post for recurring entries documents - f.14?
    For the purpose of segregation of duties, I need accountant A to allow to create/park recurring entries but not post. Acccountant B will be allow to post the recurring documents created by account A.
    Pls help.
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    Here's my thoughts on this.
    As it is Recurring entries is a two step transaction.
    Have "Segregation of Responsibilities" at the time of creation of the Recurring entires itself.
    and have the second person to post it. Of course you can prevent the second person from changing any thing in the recurring document.
    Rather than Parking the recurring documents.
    Regards,

  • Controller role Park and Post

    Hi Experts
    Here's what I got.
    I need roles for my customer to park and post documents.  This is what he is asking for:
    Controller Role:  No park, only post
    Cost Acct Role:  Park and Post, but no posting their own parked docs
    Acct Clerk Role:  Can only Park
    I asked that he send me the transaction codes they will be using for this.  Also, I thought I would use tcode SU24 and identify which authorization objects need to be interrogated.  Anyone have a better solution?
    I was able to get the tcodes the customer wants to use:
    FB50 would be post only.
    FV50 would be park only.
    Edited by: Jim McCollum on Sep 10, 2008 10:50 PM

    Dear JIM,
    There is a useful document with screenshots on this wonderful functionality of SAP and this has saved lot of writing.
    Link: [Click here|http://www.whypad.com/posts/sap-how-to-post-a-parked-document-fbv0/56/|Tip]
    Trust this helps much and solves your problem!
    Regards,
    Ashok SINGH

Maybe you are looking for

  • Getting error while deploying the   component from VC 6.0 to Portal 6.0

    Hi all,   we are working on  Portal 6.0 sp 11  and trying to deploy some components from  VC 6.0  to the portal. The developed components on VC  gives the desired output on preview. but while deploying it gives the errorr   Error in executing a proce

  • Need help in displaying XML in JSP

    Hi there, i'm a newbi in XML and Java - I have the following prob, think for most of u nothing very difficult (or better thought so, I've posted this question in different forums here, but nobody answers :) I get an XML response from a search engine,

  • Use Navigation Node Title of Term Store in a Content Search webpart

    Hi, Do you have an idea on how to use the Navigation Node Title of a Term in Term Store to a Content Search webpart? I can now get the value of the Term itself, but I need is the Navigation Node Title of that term. I'm using managed properties. Thank

  • Error in export

    Subject: exp query=\"where to_char\(DATE_FIELD\,\'MMYYYY\'\)=\'032006\'\" RDBMS Version: 9.2.0.7 Operating System and Version: AIX 5 Error Number (if applicable): LRM-00101 Product (i.e. SQL*Loader, Import, etc.): export Product Version: 9.2.0.7 exp

  • Having a print problem on a mailing label report using the merge modules.

    Crystal Reports 2008 v 12.1.6.1116 when I print directly from Crystal Reports designer, the labels print correctly.  If I print the report from our application software using the Crystal merge module, the top of page margin is not the same. I am usin