Workflow Q's (.DNG, DPX, AE, Resolve)

I've done two projects now in Premiere, and think it's a great piece of software.  However, I'm finding the finishing stage of the workflow to be super tedious and I'm wondering if I'm doing something wrong, or if there is an easier way to go about it.
1. I work natively in Premiere with cinema .dng's. 2.5K resolution.
2. Edit, and use effects such as comp, stabilization, pan/tilt, blending modes etc.  Sometimes I use "Replace with After Effects Comp" (cinema .dngs don't currently work with this function, but supposedly it's being fixed)
3. Lock edit.  Prep sequence for Resolve - remove resizing, effects etc. in order to have all of the image in Resolve.  Output XML.
4. Color in Resolve.  Output 16-bit DPX at full resolution
5. XML does not support DPX, so I manually place footage into sequence.  This is doable for minute long videos, but for longer form content it doesn't seem ideal.  Conform 2.5K shots to 1920x1080, reapply affects etc.
6. Any shots that were sent to AE via 'replace function' I then separately output from Resolve and manually 'replace footage' in AE.
For step 5, it would be great to use the 'replace footage' option in Premiere but I can't as sometimes a single clip will be used multiple times throughout a sequence and Resolve outputs multiple clips for that one shot.
Obviously this would be easier if I used a compressed format id'd by XML, but I want to retain as much image quality as possible before the effects, panning, resizing etc. are rendered.
The stage going from Resolve back to Premiere (or any other software) is the part that is very time consuming, and sometimes not perfect.  I guess I'm looking for advice on how to make this process more manageable, or if this is simply the nature of the beast.
Also, is XML a static operation or will it be updated to support image sequences such as DPX and more effects.
Thanks!

the best way to get footage back into premiere is to have it replace the original footage in the sequence timeline. this is normally done with "make offline" and "relink". doing this transfers any effects and transitions to the new clips. the breakdown in this workflow is the relink in premiere. even with the update to the relink options adding the ignore file extension option in premiere, it doesn't automatically link others when relinking. when i use cinemadng's in premiere it uses the image sequence as part of the file name, this breaks any chance of an automatic relink.
the only easy option i know to get this relink to work is to use proxy files generated in resolve for the edit.  then after color grading render out individual clips again, just like when making the proxies. the difference is instead of using dpx, this requires using a format such as the quicktime uncompressed, cineform, or dnxhr that will be a single file.  then premiere will be able to relink to these color graded clips, and will keep all your effects in place. you can even swap out proxies for the color graded by renaming the folders they are in, instead of the relink option in premiere.  if you aren't satisfied with one of those codecs vs dpx, this wont be a solution. since its being rendered after the color grading, the quicktime uncompressed 10-bit might be good enough for you?  you can still render separately the AE clips in dpx or tiff if desired...   to use cineform in resolve i believe you have to purchase it, and adobe doesn't yet support dnxhr so thats not an option at this time.
another option, if you use the majority of you footage is to do primary correction in resolve first and export to dpx. then use the dpx to edit in premiere, do your AE comps, and speedgrade to polish off corrections and apply a grade. never to return to resolve... this will keep you from fighting premiere's relink with the resolve roundtrip. as neil points out, speedgrade with dynamic link saves much of the headaches. for the best performance, don't apply any effects until after done with speedgrade. speedgrade is a decent program, but if you are use to resolve you may find it lacking.

Similar Messages

  • DPX Workflow

    Hey all,
    I need to make a showreel using image sequences from DPX's to maintain the exact same quality that is produced once DPX's have been submitted after compositing. What is the best workflow to take these DPX shots and put them into final cut, edit them with no trouble and export them whilst maintaining the exact same quality? - My current workflow which I have come up with is to open the DPX's in quicktime player as an image sequence, then save this sequence as a reference movie so it's a small percentage of its original size, after that I would use media manager to convert this to a proper quicktime and then when I come to exporting the showreel I will need to swap back the new quicktime with the original DPX sequence so that all the quality is maintained...
    It would be really useful if someone has a workflow they know which works and I could benefit from because I feel I am doing this the long way round.
    Thanks you, any comments would be greatly appreciated.
    Tristan

    Eric, thanks for all your help with this. I just tried the whole workflow and I'm stuck at the last step. To go over what I did:
    1. From AE, cut my DPX files into clips and outputted v210 files for each.
    2. Imported those into PP
    3. Made a sequence with them and sent that to a new AE comp, dynamically linked, to make any further changes.
    4. In AE, opened that original project and exported a DPX sequence for the clips.
    Is that all correct? If so, it's working great.
    Now I'm at the stage of re-importing, and I don't know what to do. If I click "Replace" on the clip and select the first file in the DPX sequence, it simply replaces the clip with that one image. If I simply import the DPX sequence, it does come in as a clip, properly named and all, but then how do I swap it in?
    I'm attaching a screenshot of where I'm stuck.
    Best,
    Lev

  • DPX - Glue Tools -  Final Cut - Color workflow problem

    Hello all,
    I haven't worked much with DPX since the Final Cut Studio 2 update and have now come upon an urgent problem.
    I need to import 16bit DPX files into Final Cut, cut them on the timeline, then send to Color and back to FCP after correction.
    I've tried this in serveral ways which lead to different problems.
    First approach:
    - Import DPX Sequence via Glue Tools DPX Import of Final Cut Pro 7
    - Drop on timeline
    - Send to Color
    - Opens just fine, color correct, render
    - Send to Final Cut Pro
    It switches to Final Cut, but doesn't open the new corrected sequence.
    Second approach:
    - Instead of sending the corrected movie to Final Cut, Export XML
    - Import XML into Final Cut
    Again it switches to Final Cut, but I get the following error message (translation from German): The xml transformation has been cancelled due to a serious error.
    Third approach:
    Because I don't have much time at the moment I thought I'd just go back to the older workflow of putting the dpx files into a mov container first (I haven't worked much with dpx since FCS2).
    So I opened one of the dpx files with QT7 and exported into an uncompressed mov file and already have the first problem.
    It seems to cut off all the shadows. When I open the newly exported mov file with QT7 and compare it with the still open dpx sequence it looks even more flat than the dpx files and seems to has lost all shadow detail.
    When I drop the mov file into FCP, send to Color and try to get some contrast into the film the shadows look completely crushed.
    Sending back to Final Cut works now though.
    I've searched through the archive and read the Glue Tools manual again, but nothing I try seems to work.
    I use the newest Glue Tools version and the settings are standard. Changing them doesn't seem to influence exporting to a mov file anyway.
    Any hint would be much appreciated!

    So I opened one of the dpx files with QT7 and exported into an uncompressed mov file and already have the first problem.
    it looks even more flat than the dpx files and seems to has lost all shadow detail.
    It "looks" even more flat and seems to have lost shadow detail?
    You are not measuring values with a scope? In other words you're "flying blind.''
    Sounds like an RGB/Y'CbCr scaling problem -- Probably the dpx files are full range and the QT is being rendered Linear so the black "0" is actually being mapped to about minus 10 IRE and your white vales won't be able to make it much above 85-90 units. There will also be a gamma difference. If you were scoping these values, they'd be instantly obvious.
    jPo

  • Workflow mts file to resolve

    hi
    I have  a panasonic tm700 and I want to export my work into davinci resolve to colour correct.
    i have a pc with lots of power but i'm trying to figure out workflow to export the files into Resolve?  do I need a transcoder program?
    thanks
    sorry if this has been brought up before.  I tried searching for it but couldn't find anything.
    thanks

    If you want to rewrap MTS files on Windows, without transcoding (like with Clipwrap), you can do that with FFMBC (for example). Yes, you can than reconect original files to rewrapped H264 MP4 and new Resolve will be able to read your timeline. However performance will be far from good.
    Actually there is no perfect workflow for Premiere > Resolve roundtripping for MTS files at this moment:
    - You can transcode everything to DNxHD or Prores before editing, but that's waste of time and disk space
    - With combination of AE scripts you can transcode only material used in edit, but again that's waste of time, and you'll have to rebuild your timeline manualy
    One option in Premiere Project Manager would solve all issues with roundtripping and that's "Create new trimmed project and TRANSCODE media with handles". That way you would be able to edit native, and transcode only media used in timeline.
    At this moment your best option is to transcode everything before edit. On Windows use DNxHD, pick bitrate according to your source footage, and everything will be fine.

  • Editing a DNG file and saving it again as DNG using Photoshop

    Hi everyone,
    I have a set of .dng raw images which I would like to edit using Photoshop and save back out as .dng files.  It sounds like a very simple task, but I have been struggling with this for half a day.
    To give a concrete example, I have two dng images from the same camera. I want to copy an object from one image and paste it to the other, and then save out the output as a .dng file.  This should take me like 2 minutes in Photoshop, right?
    Well, when I open the files, it first brings up the Adobe Camera Raw tool, but this only lets me do very basic edits (I can't figure out how to copy an object from one image to another, let alone perform the necessary edits to blend them seamlessly.).
    So I click "Open Image" to get them into Photoshop, where I can do all of my necessary edits (copy and paste, brushes, etc.).  However, after I am finished and I try to save my edits, Photoshop only lets me save the output in .psd (along with other formats) but not dng.  I need to save it back out as .dng, as the next program in our workflow pipeline requires .dng files as input.  So how do I do this simple task?
    Why can't I save my resulting image back out as a .dng file?  I tried saving as .psd and then using Adobe DNG converter to turn it into a dng, but it doesn't seem to be able to do that.  I also tried saving as Photoshop RAW, but for some reason the converter can't convert from Photoshop RAW to DNG.  It doesn't make any sense to me.
    I know that Photoshop knows my camera parameters because it was able to read the original dng files properly in the first place.  So why can't I read in the .dng image make some edits and then save it?  How are people editing dng files?
    Thanks for your help.

    Also, there is no way to turn an image back into raw image data after it has been edited in Photoshop. It would be as difficult as uncooking an egg.
    I understand that this is difficult if I am doing arbitrary image editing operations, since those operations may not be properly defined in the RAW space.  But in this case I am cloning pixels from one .dng image to another.  Shouldn't this be possible?
    For example, assume we have 2 dng images and we want to take the left half of one and paste it in the same position over the other.  I am not familiar with the dng spec, but at some level it should encode the values at each pixel (perhaps with the appropriate camera curve).  So I just simply want to overwrite the values of one .dng image with values at the same pixels of the other, and since it's the same camera with the same settings used for both this should be possible, right?  In the worst case, I could write a program based on the DNG spec that parses the two dng files, overwrites the necessary pixel information simply using the second image's data, and then writes the dng back out.  But this seems like a complicated way to do something that there should be an Adobe tool to do.
    Perhaps it would help if I tell you exactly why I need this for.  We are capturing raw video using the Blackmagic Cinema Camera which outputs a directory full of 2.5k dng images for each take.  We were doing a take of a scene using a tripod, but an otherwise great take was ruined because at one point a crew member poked their head into frame.   So I want to use information from the other dng frames to overwrite this portion of this image to hide this problem.  
    If these were regular images (.jpg, .tif, .exr) it would take us no time in Photoshop to use the information from the other "good" frames to fix this problem seamlessly.  However, we would like to keep everything in dng format so that I can then read everything into DaVinci Resolve for color grading correctly.   Any idea on how I can do this, if I can't use Photoshop?
    Thank you in advance for your help!

  • What's the status of integrating Sony Raw (.mxf and .dngs) into SpeedGrade?

    I just was hoping for a status update on when both .mxf raw and .dng raw (for Sony) will function fully. I have several projects coming up where I would like to begin moving them to SpeedGrade, as the new workflow will definitely be smoother.
    Just a refresher for all:
          Sony Raw (though it was supposed to be available in 7.1) does not read in SpeedGrade via Direct Link as a .mxf file.
         Sony Raw .dngs are read incorrectly in all Adobe products at the moment (including SG). Right now my workflow for the DNGs involves processing separately in DaVinci before moving into my Adobe workflow. I'd love to be able to skip the Resolve step.
    Thanks,
    Ted

    I appreciate that Sony Raw (.mxf) was fixed in 7.2. However, despite the update saying it contained additional Raw fixes, it still seems that Sony Raw (.dngs) are not being handled correctly by Adobe.
    Is there any estimate on when this might be available?
    Thank you,
    Ted

  • WORKFLOW IN ROLE

    hello folks,
    i have created a user in su01 transaction,also created a role .In taht role i have given the authorization to the object(infoarea,infocube) as per the requirement,as well as have given the authorization for RSA1 transaction.Now added thatn role in the user created.but when i log in with the user i created and run the RSA1 it gives me NO AUTHORIZATION error and when i review the role,in that WORKFLOW tab is got red.Could you please explain what is this WORKFLOW is about and how to resolve the problem.
    regards
    suyog patil

    HI ,
    You Can try this.
    Go to PFCG Tcode and create role >> Menu Tab > assign Transaction - RSA1 and SU53.
    Assign Profile. 
    Expert Mode.-- give detail of your objects.
    Generate.
    User Tab >  assign user and generate.
    Regards
    Suneet

  • Workflow Setup problem

    Hi,
    I have the problem below when I install the Oracle WorkFlow Tool. How can I resolve it ? I need install any other Oracle package ?
    Thank you,
    Faria
    SQL Exception encountered during upload: ORA-04068: existing state of packages has been discarded
    ORA-04063: package body "OWF_MGR.WF_EVENT_SYNCHRONIZE_PKG" has errors
    ORA-06508: PL/SQL: could not find program unit being called
    ORA-06512: at line 1

    Looks like there are erros when creating the package. which workflow version and database version are you using?
    If this is a 9.0.1.4 instance make sure you apply the database patch for bug 2528048.
    Check out the number of packages invalid and see what the error is.

  • Execution interrupted msg in workflow first step

    Hi all,
    Am getting a Message (in the message text tab) in workflow log (detail section). The very first step of workflow is an activity to "instantiate employee" details. Its been used in mostly all workflows. It was working fine in development. But now in quality, everyone workflow is in "ready" state at first step and in the msg tab, am getting a msg stated : "Execution interrupted". Could anyone tell me what could be the reason for the same?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi,
       I am slso getting the same error message " Execution Interrupted SWF 611 " while executing standard workflow .
    Kindly guide me to resolve this . What type of customizing should be maintained in SWU3 to overcome this error .
    Thanks and Regards,
    S.Sivakumar

  • Embed Original Option for DNG Conversion

    I have switched over my digital workflow now to DNG. I would love to see Adobe add an option to embed the original RAW file to it's DNG conversion in Lightroom. I was hoping that someone from Adobe would read this and take this suggestion into consideration...if not in v1.1, maybe in a future version. Thank You!

    Ok, I am a novice here, but I am wondering:
    What is the advantage to embed the original RAW into a DNG?
    I believe I understand the value of the DNG: that it provides a single format for RAW data that simplifies the job software needs to do to render the RAW data, rather than needing to translate a zillion file formats. Also it removes the need for sidecar XMP files. OK, that sounds like good things.
    So, assuming one already has a good backup of the RAW stowed away somewhere, and also assuming that the RAW-to-DNG converter is competant to do what it is supposed to, Why would one want the RAW embedded in the DNG?
    One other question: would embedding the RAW file double the size of the DNG?
    Thanks

  • DNG support in Photoshop Element

    I want to catalog my RAW files in PSE. To day I catalog the resulting JPEGs after RAW conversion but I'm not happy with this workflow. The DNG format opens up the possibility to write tags to the XMP part of the DNG file.
    When I try to write my tags to the DNG file PSE do nothing and gives no messages... Is Adobe going to fix this?
    If I want to try another organizer - is there any method to export captions and tag from PSE if you can't write this info to the file?

    I haven't replaced my NEF file with DNG. Just want to find a method to add caption and tag to my RAW file and have the possibility to take my work to another DAM application in the future. If PSE can write metadata to DNG like ACR/Brigde this could be a safe route...
    Are you other not concerned by this missing functionallity?

  • Workflow Dangling Error ?

    Hi ,
    I am getting this error
    " WFLDRLFK_FAIL
    WFLDRLFK_DANGLING_REF_ACT LABEL=VERIFY_COUNTRY PROCESS_NAME=ROOT PROCESS_ITEM_TYPE=XXAPLSHP NAME=VERIFY_COUNTRY ITEM_TYPE=XXAPLSHP "
    in my workflow earlier I have defined a function by name "Verfiy Country " . now It has been deleted but when ever I am trying to move an attribute or save the workflow I am seeing this Dangling error message .
    although my workflow is working fine .
    how to resolve this issue ?
    Skg

    Hello,
    Could you please post the actual error. I doubt very much it is "Workflow Ambiguos Error".
    regards
    Rick Bakker
    hanabi technology

  • Failure to convert CR2 to DNG

    I am not able to convert my CR2 files to DNG.
    DNG converter is saying there is an error parsing the files.
    what does this mean?

    Walt,
    I suppose it is a matter of what you become accustomed to doing. I have a shortcut to my CF card on my desktop. All I do is double click on that shortcut, highlight all of the raw files and drag them to the DNG converter. Then I specify the folder on my hard drive where I want the DNG files to be saved. That's all there is to it. Sometimes, when the images are more important to me, I will save the original raw images to a DVD. But a lot of the time I don't even keep them. But then, that is the way I have chosen to work.
    There are more reasons to upgrade to Photoshop CS3 besides just getting support for a new camera. ACR in Photoshop CS3 has been significantly enhanced. There are a number of new controls. But in order to get all of the changes it will be necessary for you to download the latest version of ACR. New controls for added in ACR 4.1. And then the cameras are continually added. It is a good idea to check for updates often to make sure you have the latest.
    Another alternative that you might want to consider is Lightroom. This Adobe product has all of the same controls that ACR 4.x has, as well as some other nice features. A lot of people prefer using Lightroom. On initial purchase, it is quite a bit less costly than Photoshop, but would probably cost you more than it would cost to upgrade to Photoshop CS3. I prefer Photoshop. But there are trial versions of both programs that you can download and try for 30 days to see what you think.
    In the meantime, my suggestion would be for you to try the DNG converter. You can start working on your raw images immediately. There really aren't that many hoops to jump through. At least give it a try. You will still have your original raw images and you can at least evaluate the workflow. The DNG converter is usually packaged with the latest version of ACR. All you have to do is copy the DNG converter to your desktop and just forget about the rest. Try a conversion and try opening them with what you have just to see if it works. But I can tell you that once you have an opportunity to use CS3/ACR you will feel extremely restricted when you have to revert back to CS2 for some reason.
    Just one last thought. Some have expected they can save money by purchasing Photoshop Elements because it uses ACR. But many of the new controls are not available in Photoshop Elements even though it uses the very same plug-in.

  • Assign Custom developed method into WorkFlow task

    Hello ladies and gentlemen,
    I've been asked to create a new Workflow to handle certain leave requirements.  The standard workflows only go so far in resolving the clients requirements.  I have created a new Object class and created a method that will help determine the follow on approvers, but when I go to add the method to a newly created task, I get the message 'Interface Implementation IF_WORKFLOW does not exist'.
    I'm assuming this is telling me I haven't defined my object in a workflow library somewhere, but I don't where or how to do so.
    Could someone please explain what this message means, and how to get around it?
    Regards,
    Steve

    It's ok - solved it myself.  For future reference, you need to include the interface 'IF_WORKFLOW'.  This will bring in WF specific methods to make the Methods visible to the workflow system.
    You need to manually activate each imported method, otherwise you will still get the same error.
    Regards,
    Steve

  • DPX header indicating incorrect size

    I have an Arri Alexa sequence that I'm exporting to DPX for Resolve (long story short, Speedgrade is great for conforming reels but the project is going to a different vendor for color).
    Under export settings I have "Full Frame (no proxy)", "1:1 (square)" and "Same Size as Proxy" for framing. Resolve incorrectly states the frame size of the sequence as something like 600x450 while Premiere will bring in frames as 1080hd. If I change "Same Size as Proxy" to 1080p, the issue is gone.
    I was always under the assumption that "Same Size as Proxy" would be the native frame size since I also have "Full Frame (no proxy)" selected.

    Brent sent me the testfiles per mail.
    the sizes are  as expected. We follow the official riff specification that requires the RIFF chunks to be WORD aligned by adding a padding byte to odd length data. This byte is not included in the chunk Size. You have to skip a byte if you find an odd chunksize.
    GFF Format Summary: Microsoft RIFF from an O'Reilly book:
    "ChunkData contains data that is WORD-aligned within the RIFF file. If the data is an odd length in size, an extra byte of NULL padding is added to the end of the data. The ChunkSize value does not include the length of the padding."
    AVI RIFF File Reference from the Microsoft site:
    "The data is always padded to nearest WORD boundary. ckSize gives the size of the valid data in the chunk; it does not include the padding, the size of ckID, or the size of ckSize."
    Spec: http://www-mmsp.ece.mcgill.ca/documents/audioformats/wave/Docs/riffmci.pdf
    I hope this helps,
    Samy
    Adobe Systems

Maybe you are looking for