Wrong batch appering in GR

Hi All,
We have created a STPO with document type NB. We have done the outbound delivery, Post goods issue and inter company billing also. While doing the MIGO with reference to out bound delivery, the different batch no is apprering.
Anybody can please tell me why it is appering the wrong batch.
Thanks in Advance.
Regards
Chandrashekar.R

and you are the assumption that SAP just looks into a batch table and picks randomly one ?
check chagne history of outbound delivery, check as well the document flow of outbound delivery, look into the PO.
This batch must have been mentioned in one of these documents.
There is one more option from where a batch can be picked: batch determination. It is usually used for goods issues, but there is no big deal to make it happen for reciepts as well.

Similar Messages

Wrong Batch selection in Subcontracting Cycle

Sear All SAP Gurus,
While doing MIGO for subcontracting PO , I have entered the different batch number against the part provided to vendor, it is giving warning message as below;
Invalid batch according to selection criteria in batch determination
Message no. LB051
I have set this message as error message in the message setting .Path SPROIMGLogistics generalBatch ManagementDefine attributes of system messages and E against cat in the message setting.
Still system is giving warning message and allow the different batches.How to avoid this.
Thanks in advance
Mahesh

closed

WRONG BATCH DETERMINATION - SALES ORDER AND DELIVERY

Dear Experts,
We have setup Batch Management in our company. The system do the automatic batch determination, but there is a problem.
If there is an expired batch on unrestricted stock, the system will take it.
I've have checked the selection criteria on the batch search strategy and there is the ">= 30 d" value in the LOBM_RLZ characteristic
But it simply let the expired batch pass.
Do I am missing something?
Please Help
Javier Sandoval Vera
Ecuador

Fields in the Material Master Record (MM03) please check the mateirl master
In the material master record, the following fields are relevant for the shelf life expiration date check:
o minimum remaining shelf life
o Total shelf life
    - If you do not enter a total shelf life, you directly enter the shelf life expiration date with the goods movements.
    - If you enter a total shelf life, you enter the production date with the goods movements. The system automatically calculates the shelf life expiration date on the basis of the production date plus shelf
       life.

Wrong batch populated on Inspection lot

Recently we came across the following issue.
GR have been posted for two by-products(mvt type 531) for a process order within a gap of 6 minutes. Since 05 inspection type was active for both the by-products, two inspection lots were created for two material documents. The batch updated in second inspection lot is same as first inspection lot (Tcode: QA03, Table: QALS). But the batch updated in the corresponding material document is different one (Tcode: MIGO, Table: MSEG). Even the batch in inspection lot is not created in the system (Tcode: MSC3N, Table: MCH1, MCHA).
Batch level is "Batch unique at material level".
Have anyone of you came across this issue? Please reply with your thoughts and experience.

No. We don't have split valuation. I am giving you example of issue . I am trying to search mat A and batch 100 in system but I didn't find in MCH1,MCHB,MCS3N. In short batch not created for particular mat and batch combination . When I searched inspection lot for both mat and batch combination then I found . This inspection lot is created after GRN for by product , movement type 531 , inspection type 05.When I saw batch in material document it is 101 instead of 100 .
Question
1. If batch 100 is not created for mat A then why it is showing on inspection lot header ?
2. If batch in mat document is 101 then actually same batch should show on inspection lot header .How come batch 100 populating on inspection lot header ?
Thanks ,

Failed sales orders: PGI picking wrong batch number

Hi ,
I have a issue in which a batch number having zero quantity is getting picked for a material even if we are having a batch with quantity for a material ... This error is available in the processing log for an output type for a sales order. while debugging the proceesing routine related to this output type it was found that the correct batches are getting picked in an internal table which is then getting paased to FM *BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE* . But it is returining errors in RETURN table. Also suggest if the passed table values are also geeting affected inside this Fm and it is because of that the problem might be coming. Please reply ASAP

Solved.

How to reverse the Batch number which was enter wrongly during GRN posting

Hi Folk,
How to reverse the Batch number which was enter wrongly during GRN posting .
Please revert.
Thank you.

You can either do a transfer posting and move quantity from this batch to another batch e.g. in MB1B with movement 311, or you cancel the entire material document using MBST transaction and redo your receipt correctly.
Then you can flag the wrong batch for deletion in MSC2N.
The batch itself gets deleted physically with the archiving transaction SARA object MM_SPSTOCK

Batch determination goes wrong when creating TO for delivery

Hello gurus, I have looked around to find a solution to why the system picks the wrong batch. We have a material that is batch managed and condition managed, so a B batch ends up in unrestricted use, and a R batch ends up in Restricted Use. The ATP check is set up so it only will see the unrestricted batches. And when I look in the delivery and checks the availability there it says I have 9 psc og B batch availible. This is correct, but when I create the following TO, it picks a R batch, probably because this is the oldest quant. How can i make this work? Is there any way to trigger ATP check at the creation of TO in transaction LT03?
in advance thanks
Regards
Ivar

Hi,
Ok, there are a couple of things you can do. First go to your delivery, go to batch split and then click on batch determination and click on either strategy analysis, log, selection criteria or strategy info. Do your analysis there to see what selection class etc is being taken into consideration. You normally put in the selection class, a characteristic which looks at the status of a certain batch and excludes the restricted batch from the determination process. The name of the characteristic is LOBM_ZUSTD (status of batch).
You can also setup batch determination in WM but you will face the same issue there. However, you can switch whether restricted batch can be moved through WM for certain mvt's.
Regarding the ATP, check the availability check control (you also see that through the batch split and then availability and scope of check to see whether restricted is included or not).
MdZ

Batch to Batch Transfer and Tracking

Question,
Since Batch to batch material transfer is possible using SAP standard functionality.
On my floor, the raw material i am consuming is batch managed and causing accounts error and negative stock due to wrong batch no. posting at the time of Co11.
due to requirement of our customers, our plant must run with proper tracking of each batch, means finish goods to raw material (specific batch) relation should be there in system.
If I maintain back flush function for BOM components in such a way that I always consume raw material from one batch (xxx) from production S-LOG. what i will do, I will refill that particular batch -xxx by transfer material from batch zzz (by batch to batch transfer) when needed to back flush.
Back flush will happen always from one batch which will reduce accounts error and negative stock generation.
Question is, will i be able to track and can built relation of raw material batch zzz and product FG?
if yes how? if no then what could be the solution for this problem.
Mr.Daar

Hi,
I think you're scenario is going little bit complex by doing transfer postings batch to batch this is very complex you know each time you have to do suppose if you have huge raw materials it leads to complexity any have for this point I can say is
while transferring the batches from XXX to ZZZ you give reference production order number in the material slip or document header text so that you can track the batches to which production order you have transferred.
in MSEG table you can trace the consumption of raw materials based on the Production order
and with 309 movement type you can trace the batch transfers I thing you have to develop a report for this.
Regards,
Ravi

Batch determination based on fifo during goods issue

Hi All,
My client requirement is that system should propose automatic batch during goods issue based on goods receipt.
I have activated batch wise split valuation.
I have maintained characterstics with MCH1 table and HSDAT.
Assigned to class and class is assigned to stratergy type.
Created sort sequence and sort rule ascennding.
Assigned this to stratergy type.
Maintained condition record also.
During goods issue to production system is not proposing the batch based on gr date.
System is not stopping me while making goods issue with other batch.
Please guide to fix the above issue.
Regards,
Venkatesh

Split valuation has nothing to do with this problem.
I hope you do not just require the sequence for physical goods issue to be FIFO because your year end valuation will be FIFO method, as this is not necessary for FIFO valuation.
IMG > Ligistics general > batch managment > batch determination > Allocation of batch determination schema and activation >...
here you set the box for batch check active, which means if a batch is entered manually then this batch is checked against the batch determination and an error is issued if the wrong batch is entered.

Batch reading request doesn't prefix field names by table name

A batch reading request doesn't prefix field names by table name and I've got a AmbigiousException which is normal because there is the same fields in the 2 tables.
The following code :
//call a ReadAllQuery and return a list of AffaireImpl
List<Affaire> listeAffaire = affaireDao.getAffaireCorrespondantes(lccJrd, lnaAnnee, lnaOrdre, lcNataffCode, lnaNoSuite);
for (Affaire affaire : listeAffaire) {
   //there is a one to Many mapping on Affaire to Dossier, with Transparent Indirection, Read-Ony and Batch Reading
   //this metod generate the wrong batch reading method
   List<Dossier> listeDossiers = affaire.getDossier();
generates the following requests:
ReadAllQuery(eu.curia.litige.model.AffaireImpl) --
SELECT * FROM LA_AFF WHERE ( ((LCC_JRD = 'C') AND (LNA_ANNEE = 8)) AND (LNA_ORDRE = 8))
ReadAllQuery(eu.curia.litige.model.DossierImpl) --
SELECT t0.*
FROM LA_DOSSIER t0, LA_AFF t1
WHERE
(((t0.LNA_NO_SUITE = t1.LNA_NO_SUITE) AND ((t0.LCC_JRD = t1.LCC_JRD) AND ((t0.LC_NATAFF_CODE = t1.LC_NATAFF_CODE) AND ((t0.LNA_ANNEE = t1.LNA_ANNEE) AND (t0.LNA_ORDRE = t1.LNA_ORDRE)))))
AND UPPER(LCC_JRD) = 'C' AND UPPER(LNA_ORDRE) = '8' AND UPPER(LNA_ANNEE) = '8')+
but the request should be :
SELECT t0.*
FROM LA_DOSSIER t0, LA_AFF t1
WHERE
(((t0.LNA_NO_SUITE = t1.LNA_NO_SUITE) AND ((t0.LCC_JRD = t1.LCC_JRD) AND ((t0.LC_NATAFF_CODE = t1.LC_NATAFF_CODE) AND ((t0.LNA_ANNEE = t1.LNA_ANNEE) AND (t0.LNA_ORDRE = t1.LNA_ORDRE)))))
AND t1.LCC_JRD = 'C' AND t1.LNA_ORDRE = '8' AND t1.LNA_ANNEE = '8')+
It's strange because this is the only place the batch reading doesn't prefix and uses a UPPER.
For now we have disabled the batch reading, but it decreases the performanes (the list of affaire can be hudge).
Any Idea?
We use TopLink 10.1.3 on a Oracle 10g Database.
Edited by: krampstudio on 2 déc. 2011 07:40
Edited by: krampstudio on Dec 7, 2011 11:57 AM

Here the mapping (I've also remove the tags of some of the direct mapping fields to simplify the reading)
     <opm:class-mapping-descriptor xsi:type="toplink:relational-class-mapping-descriptor">
         <opm:class>eu.curia.litige.model.AffaireImpl</opm:class>
         <opm:alias>Affaire</opm:alias>
         <opm:primary-key>
            <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LC_NATAFF_CODE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LCC_JRD" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_ANNEE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_NO_SUITE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_ORDRE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
         </opm:primary-key>
         <opm:events xsi:type="toplink:event-policy"/>
         <opm:querying xsi:type="toplink:query-policy">
            <toplink:does-exist-query xsi:type="toplink:does-exist-query">
               <toplink:existence-check>check-database</toplink:existence-check>
            </toplink:does-exist-query>
         </opm:querying>
         <opm:attribute-mappings>
            <opm:attribute-mapping xsi:type="toplink:one-to-many-mapping">
               <opm:attribute-name>dossier</opm:attribute-name>
               <opm:read-only>true</opm:read-only>
               <opm:get-method>getDossier</opm:get-method>
               <opm:set-method>setDossier</opm:set-method>
               <opm:reference-class>eu.curia.litige.model.DossierImpl</opm:reference-class>
               <opm:target-foreign-key>
                  <opm:field-reference>
                     <opm:source-field table="LA_DOSSIER" name="LCC_JRD" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                     <opm:target-field table="LA_AFF" name="LCC_JRD" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                  </opm:field-reference>
                  <opm:field-reference>
                     <opm:source-field table="LA_DOSSIER" name="LNA_ANNEE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                     <opm:target-field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_ANNEE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                  </opm:field-reference>
                  <opm:field-reference>
                     <opm:source-field table="LA_DOSSIER" name="LNA_ORDRE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                     <opm:target-field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_ORDRE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                  </opm:field-reference>
                  <opm:field-reference>
                     <opm:source-field table="LA_DOSSIER" name="LC_NATAFF_CODE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                     <opm:target-field table="LA_AFF" name="LC_NATAFF_CODE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                  </opm:field-reference>
                  <opm:field-reference>
                     <opm:source-field table="LA_DOSSIER" name="LNA_NO_SUITE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                     <opm:target-field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_NO_SUITE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
                  </opm:field-reference>
               </opm:target-foreign-key>
               <toplink:batch-reading>true</toplink:batch-reading>
               <toplink:container xsi:type="toplink:list-container-policy">
                  <toplink:collection-type>oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectList</toplink:collection-type>
               </toplink:container>
               <toplink:indirection xsi:type="toplink:transparent-collection-indirection-policy"/>
               <toplink:selection-query xsi:type="toplink:read-all-query">
                  <toplink:container xsi:type="toplink:list-container-policy">
                     <toplink:collection-type>oracle.toplink.indirection.IndirectList</toplink:collection-type>
                  </toplink:container>
               </toplink:selection-query>
            </opm:attribute-mapping>
            <opm:attribute-mapping xsi:type="toplink:direct-mapping">
               <opm:attribute-name>lccJrd</opm:attribute-name>
               <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LCC_JRD" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            </opm:attribute-mapping>
            <opm:attribute-mapping xsi:type="toplink:direct-mapping">
               <opm:attribute-name>lcNataffCode</opm:attribute-name>
               <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LC_NATAFF_CODE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            </opm:attribute-mapping>
            <opm:attribute-mapping xsi:type="toplink:direct-mapping">
               <opm:attribute-name>lnaAnnee</opm:attribute-name>
               <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_ANNEE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            </opm:attribute-mapping>
            <opm:attribute-mapping xsi:type="toplink:direct-mapping">
               <opm:attribute-name>lnaNoSuite</opm:attribute-name>
               <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_NO_SUITE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            </opm:attribute-mapping>
            <opm:attribute-mapping xsi:type="toplink:direct-mapping">
               <opm:attribute-name>lnaOrdre</opm:attribute-name>
               <opm:field table="LA_AFF" name="LNA_ORDRE" xsi:type="opm:column"/>
            </opm:attribute-mapping>
         </opm:attribute-mappings>
         <toplink:descriptor-type>independent</toplink:descriptor-type>
         <toplink:caching>
            <toplink:cache-invalidation-policy xsi:type="toplink:time-to-live-cache-invalidation-policy">
               <toplink:time-to-live>30000</toplink:time-to-live>
            </toplink:cache-invalidation-policy>
         </toplink:caching>
         <toplink:instantiation/>
         <toplink:copying xsi:type="toplink:instantiation-copy-policy"/>
         <toplink:change-policy xsi:type="toplink:deferred-detection-change-policy"/>
         <toplink:tables>
            <toplink:table name="LA_AFF"/>
         </toplink:tables>
      </opm:class-mapping-descriptor>

Physical Inventory Count with Batches / Inventory Tracking+Posting

Hi,
There does not seem to be any way to record a Physical Inventory count with Batch managed items.
Scenario-1: In case 1.8 kg of batch number 222 is counted during Physical Count. B1 has Batch number 111 with quantity 2.5kg. B1 assumes that a lesser quantity of existing batch 111 was counted and the batch SELECTION screen appears.
Scenario-2: Similarly, if 3 kg of batch number 222 is counted during Physical Count and Batch number 111 exists on Business One with quantity 2.5kg, then B1 assumes that a new batch was found and the batch CREATION screen appears.
Scenario-3: If 2.5 kg of batch number 222 is counted during Physical Count - with Batch number 111 on Business One with quantity 2.5kg, then B1 assumes a zero "difference" in posting window. Wrong batch removal and new batch addition cannot be done - the batch selection/creation screen does not pop up with CTRL+TAB.
A Physical inventory count sheet with hundreds of rows with all 3 above scenarios in the rows is normally supposed to be entered into any system.
An easy way to do this should exist on SAP B1 but does not appear to exist right now.
Thanks,
Ajay Audich
Message# 551219/2009
Dear Ajay Audich,
Thanks for your message and screenshots. In current version of SAP Business One, the Inventory Posting functionality does not offer input at the batch level. The system behaves in the following way:
If the Difference number is positive, you will see a Define Bathes
window where you can assign the item quantity to the relevant batches.
If the Difference number is negative, you will see a Batch Number
Selection widow where you can issue item from the relevant batch.
So it isnot possible to enter the count for batch managed items per batch. The possible workaround is after Inventory Posting, use Goods Issue and Receipt to manually adjust the Batch quantity.
Please kindly have a try. If the feature is important for customer
business process, please kindly refer to attached Note 1028874 for
further action.
Sorry for any inconvenience, we appreciate your understanding.
Kind regards,
Canna Mu
SAP Business One Product Support
Edited by: Ajay Audich on Jun 8, 2009 1:48 PM

Yes - it is important for the customer & will look at further steps as advised by you.
Thanks for your reply.

Excise - Balance qty, showing wrong in RG 23 D and in J1iJ

Hi:
We have issue with respect to the Excise records inventory movement. and this started happening for no reason in last month.
The balance of inventory in the Excise records is not getting exhausted as and when invoicing is done.
For example:
If XYZ batch inward through GR is 100KG on 1st Jan
Issue through invoice on 2nd Jan is 10Kg
Ideally the status of this product batch in excise records should be 90Kg
after invoicing on 2nd. This is not happening. The balance is still showing
as 100Kg.
This could create wrong batch selection in invoice for excise and the
excise records is not showing the correct movement. This could create
problems in statutory compliance.
Can someone tell me why this is happening and what needs to be done?
Thanks

Hi Sunil,
Check whether any system upgrade happened before one month.
Also consider these two notes if these are relevant
2017098 - Not able to create Depot outgoing excise invoice using
transaction J1IJ and incorrect tax calculation in J1IG
and
2047135 - Incorrect tax calculation and table updation in
J1IG
Regards
Binoy

Error In Batch Determination

Hello,
I have configured Batch Determination Only for Inventory Management as follows:
-Created Characteristic for SLED
-Class
-Sort Sequence
And assigned them in "Startegy type"
-Strategy Type was created (from copying Standard)
and assigned to "Search Procedure"
This search procedure is assignd to Movement type
Defination of Initial Batch creation for Movement Type is also maintained as - Automatic/manual without Chk.
Batch Classification for Goods movement is activated for MvT- 101 & 561
with indicator 3.
Classification is also maintained in Material Master
Still getting WARNING message while doing Goods Reciept using MvT-561
as follows:
{ Invalid batch according to selection criteria in batch determination
Message no. LB051
Diagnosis:
This batch is not allowed according to the selection criteria assigned to it. The specifications for the batch entered do not match the selection criteria from batch determination.
Procedure:
Check selection criteria for the Transaction}
I just want to determine batches on their SLED
So that when i will issue this batch tht time i can find batch according to shortest SLED.
Can anybody help me????
Thanks
Kant

Hi,
Configuration Steps
- Define Inventory management Condition - T.code is OMA1 (Optional)
- Define Acess Sequence (SPRO --> Logistic General ---> Batch management ---> Batch Determination and batch check ---> Access Sequences --> Define Inventory Management Access Sequences (Optional)
- Define Strategy Type :- Logistic General ---> Batch management ---> Batch Determination and batch check --->Strategy Types ---> Define Inventory Management Strategy Types
- Define Batch Search Procedure :- Logistic General ---> Batch management ---> Batch Determination and batch check ->Batch Search Procedure Definition--> Define Inventory Management Search Procedure
- Batch Search Procedure Allocation and Check Activation - T.code OMCG
Now in this T. code if you activate check box for Check Batch then system will throw an
error or warning massage in case of wrong Batch Assignment during Manual Batch allocation.
And I think you are finding the same error (LB051) Correct?
Prerequisites at Master Level
- Material Should be batch managed.
- Batch Class with Characteristic LOBM_VFDAT should be maintained in Material Master
- Create Sort Rule with T.code CU70 (FEFO - First expire First Out)and assign Characteristic LOBM_VFDAT with Ascending rule.
- Create Batch Search Strategy using T.code MBC1 and assign above created Sort rule and batch Class to it.
and if you want to allow more than batches in case of Sort qty then assign no. Batch Spli(Max. allow batch Split is 999)
- Most Important Shelf Life Data should be maintain in all the concern Batches.
Regards,
Dhaval

BATCH CREATION PROBLEM

Hi Experts,
                   I have a requirement of creating a program which will create batch without using t-code u2018MSC1Nu2019 and at the same time user should not be able to run the T-code u2018MSC1Nu2019 . So, I have used the Fn. Module u2018BAPI_BATCH_CREATEu2019 for this purpose . But the problem is that, the user must have the authorization of the tcode u2018MSC1Nu2019 for using this Fn. Module .
                Now, I want to know is there any way by which I can create batch programmatically without using u2018MSC1Nu2019 at the same time without giving authorization for the Tcode MSC1N.
Deb .

Dear DaveL ,
                     To give the answer of your question , I have to explain the situation and background of such kind of program .
                     The users have the authority to create batch by u201CMSC1Nu2019 . But the problem is that , if user give any wrong data ( Batch Number ) in the 1st screen of u2018MSC1Nu2019 a wrong batch is created in sap which creating different kind of problems like batch booking, raw matrial booking etc. So we are trying to provide a customized program which will predict the next batch everytime user run this , so that user cannot put any wong batch. Thatu2019s the reason we are trying to give the users the authority of batch creation with our customized program, not with u2018MSC1Nu2019 . But the function module u2018BAPI_BATCH_CREATEu2019 cannot work without the authorization of u2018MSC1Nu2019 .
So, pls make me know if there is any remedy of my problem
DEB

BATCH - FIFO NOT FLOWING

HI,
i have carried out the blw setting as per said in sdn forum,
If Batch Management is active for the materials then use following process;
First create characteristic in CT04 for Batch Creation Date, under "Addnl data", enter Table Name MCH1 or MCHA (As per Batch Class 022 or 023) and Field ERSDA and save it.
Assign this characteristics in CL02 in your Batch Class.
CU70 - Create a Sort Rule and specify the Characteristic of Batch Creation Date and activate "Ascending" indicator.
Now assign the Sort Rule in MBC1 and keep Selection criteria as "O" for the Strategy type.
Now do batch determination in MIGO.
But, when i do GI (mb1a- cost center) , where the system doesn't propose the quantities based on the batches and GR dates in FIFO order..
In mb1a, I'm getting an information msege as "Strategy contains no selection specifications
Message no. LB007" .. pls guide me how to get it ??

Hi:
You must have configured batch determination procedure for inventory management as well a must have created sort rule too.
I understand you have assigned the relavant movement types to search procedure so that it would determine the batch for that movement.
Also,you must have to define the condition record for the batch in MBC1 for your condition type(Strategy type).
Now batch must be determined in the relavant transaction.
However,for correct batch determination,you must check the stock available,posting date etc as per the sort rule you have defined. Based on this parameters correct batch will be determined. Some time system determine wrong batch,for this you must check the acailability check rule also.
Hope this will help you out.
Cheers
Rahul
Awards plz if helpful.

Wrong batch appering in GR

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for