WS10000276 and start condition

Hi,
Once I have activated the WF WS10000276, I can't control the WF WS10000276 by start condition.
The reason is that I have 3 3 workflows for BUS2121 ( WS10000276 is one of them). So I want to control the starting of the WF based on the condition "&EC Requirement Coverage Request.Requester User.Company&". But always WS10000276 is activated.
Please help.

Hello Pranav,
we have the same and it works fine. In our system (SRM 4.0) the starting condition looks like
&_EVT_OBJECT.REQUISITIONERUSER.COMPANY& = 50000001
for workflows 1 and 2 and
&_EVT_OBJECT.REQUISITIONERUSER.COMPANY&<> 50000001
for workflow 3.
(<> means the "unequal" sign provided by the condition editor)
Best regards,
Karsten

Similar Messages

Difference between check function module and start condition

Hello Rob,
In previous answer u said thr is no difference between check function module and startcondition but there is a difference between checkfunction module and start condition.
Before the workflow is triggering can u able to check the conditions in startcondition.The startcondition can check the condition only after the workflow has been triggered.
But in check function module u can check the condtion before the workflow got triggered.

Kjetil,
Dont' fall for it, these two (unless deephak and catherina are the same person...) are just spamming the forum.
<a href="https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3206751">https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3206751</a>
<a href="https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3206440">https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3206440</a>
<a href="https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3207214">https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3207214</a>
<a href="https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3207179">https://forums.sdn.sap.com/click.jspa?searchID=1763105&messageID=3207179</a>
As you've correctly established, even the SAP documentation contradicts their nonsense. A start condition is implemented as a check function, so there is no difference; and NO workflow is started at any time if they fail.
Cheers,
Mike

RSCRM_BAPI and Start Condition after Event

Hello all
I have a process chain set up that loads data to cubes. I wish to run RSCRM_BAPI after a certain cube has loaded.
I create the extract in RSCRM_BAPI and for the START condition I use 'After Event' does anyone know if this is correct and if it is how do I identify the event that I want the job to run after or do I use 'After Job' and agin if so how do I idntify job etc.
Thanks
George

Hi,
Using Customer Exit Variables we can work with RSCRM_BAPI. See some example. If you need differnet reports i.e. formates then create the copy of the same reports an dchange the selection variables with Month, Week , Day like that using Customer exit variable.
Re: Running Quaries automatically and saving them in as a Excel file in Server
Re: Data transfer to external systems
Re: Loading from a Custom R/3 Table
Re: How can I schedule my Bex report to execute in background
Re: How can I insert the RSCRM_BAPI into Process chain?
See the help abt Customer Exits variables in Reports.
https://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/profile/Surendra+Reddy
How to transfer the Data from SAP-System to Non-SAP system without additional Cost/License
/people/surendrakumarreddy.koduru/blog/2009/03/11/how-to-transfer-the-data-from-sap-system-to-non-sap-system-without-additional-costlicense
Thanks
Reddy

I have a 13in macbook pro 2006. Playing vedeos using youtube or VLC produces a very choppy effect. This stop and start condition just appeared. Anything I can do to remedy the condition, or do I need to buy a new computer?

I have a 13in macbook pro 2006. Playing videos using youtube or VLC(or the like) produces a very choppy effect. This start and stop condition just appeared. Anything I can do to remedy the condition or do I need to buy a new computer?

Since most YouTube content requires the Flash plugin, uninstall then reinstall the plugin > Troubleshoot Flash Player | Mac OS
And try deleting Flash cookies > Flush.app – Flash Cookie Removal Tool For OS X | MacHacks.TV

Start conditions and check function modules

Hi,
When we apply start conditions to any particular even linkage you will find check function module as SWB_2_CHECK_FB_START_COND_EVAL. However, what if i want to implement both a custom check function module AND start conditions ?
My requirement is to implement both start conditions and check function module.
Is this possible ?
Thank you,
Nikhil.

Hi,
You can use both of the things, however its advisable to check all start conditions if you are using check FM.
This is interface for custom check FM,once you have the key value, you can put all the checks here
*"*"Local Interface:
*" IMPORTING
*"     VALUE(OBJTYPE) TYPE SWETYPECOU-OBJTYPE
*"     VALUE(OBJKEY) TYPE SWEINSTCOU-OBJKEY
*"     VALUE(EVENT) TYPE SWETYPECOU-EVENT
*"     VALUE(RECTYPE) TYPE SWETYPECOU-RECTYPE
*" EXPORTING
*"     REFERENCE(REFERENCE) TYPE C
*" TABLES
*"      EVENT_CONTAINER STRUCTURE SWCONT
*" EXCEPTIONS
*"      NOT_TRIGGERD
Hope this helps.
Regards,
Sangvir Singh

Action with start condition always triggers

Functionality required: "when its 4 days from the actual date an
Audit is to take place an e-mail should be triggered to the
audit attendees"
I have created a new date rule (4 days before - reminder) and
added this date rule to the date profile 000000000003. I am
using this date profile in my actions and have set a new start
condition to trigger an e-mail alert when "todays date" = my new
date rule. I have set up scheduled conditions which are met.
when i create transactions which meet both the scheduled and
start conditions (from my perspective) the action is getting
triggered to send the e-mail reminder. My new date rule is as
follows:
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<TimeRule>
   <TimeRuleSource>
      <ruleline>
         <AssignTimeExp displaytype="AssignTime">
            <VarTimeExp displayType="VarTime"
                               name="RESULT"
                           position='B'>
              <VarObjectExp displaytype="VarObject"
                                name="SYSTEM"/>
            </VarTimeExp>
            <MoveTimeExp displaytype="MoveTime" direction="-">
               <VarTimeExp displayType="VarTime"
                                  name="ORDERACTUAL"
                                  position="B">
                 <VarObjectExp displaytype="VarObject"
                                name="SYSTEM"/>
               </VarTimeExp>
               <ConstDuraExp displaytype="ConstDura"
                                duration="4" timeunit="DAY">
                  <VarObjectExp displaytype="VarObject"
                                name="SYSTEM"/>
               </ConstDuraExp>
            </MoveTimeExp>
         </AssignTimeExp>
      </ruleline>
   </TimeRuleSource>
When i test it using various dates it seems to work as expected, it returms false when it should fail and true when it should suceed When tested from within the date rule for the FROM and TO date for todays dates i get the following:
Deadlines
Appointment Type RESULT
From SA 10.02.2007 14:27:52 GMTUK
From
Appointment Type ORDERACTUAL
From WE 14.02.2007 14:27:52
To WE 14.02.2007 14:27:52
Duration
Reference Objects
SYSTEM GMTUK CL_TIMECALENDAR_SIMPLE
In my start condition i am testing for my date rule (4 days
before - reminder) = todays date.
Can anyone explain why my start condition is always being triggered
Thanks in advance
Ed

Hello Easwar Ram,
Thanks for your reply.
No, I didn't create an Action Profile. I use standard profile: /SCWM/TU (Shipping & Receiving - Transportation Unit).
I only have created a new Action Definition, Schedule and Start Conditions for this Definition. All work correctly with the exception of the button 'Start Condition Parameter'.
I don't know why the button appears because I didn't define a Condition Parameter for the Start Condition. And when I click on this button I get an error in standard SAP code:
1) li_bor_object ?= l_context->appl.
2) ls_bor_handle = li_bor_object->get_bor_object( ip_objtype = l_objtype ).
L_context->appl has value '' in the debugger. After line 1 the value of the li_bor_object is '' therefore line 2 terminates the transaction with error.
Maybe this occurs because the Action Profile uses a Persistent Class for Object Type instead of a Business Object Repository?

What is the difference using start condition and check function module

what is the difference between using start condition and check function module

That's new to me, I thought a start condition was evaluated before the workflow started, and thus now workflow work item is available. That's why I think the only situation in which start conditions/check functions can't be used, is when the availability of a workflow log for investigation of exactly what stopped the workflow is a requirement.
I suppose the <a href="http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/4c/86bf43feca11d2a64f0060087a79ea/frameset.htm">SAP documentation</a> is in need of an update.

Configure Start conditions based on ibase\ and Customer Fields ??

Dear friends,
We have enchanced transaction types(document types) using Easy enchancement workbench (EEWB). Therefore we have a new tab(customer screen) in all the transaction types we use !!.
This tab has customer fields in it...
Now the requirement we have here is that we have to send Emails based on these customer fields and ibase and component.
How can i create start conditions based on the customer fields and ibase which are not present in object type BUS2000116(default) which is currently reffered while i create start conditions.
I know that i can create new object type(using swo1) and let it be have inherited supertype as BUS2000116 and then inside the new object type i can have my attributes( ibase and those customer fields) inside the new created object.
Is there any way of incalculating the customer fields and ibase \component in BUS2000116 ( by default it does not have these) ???
Assuming that i created new object type, how do i make use of this type while i am configuring conditions.
Any help would certainly be rewarded.

hi again,
Can anybody take some time out and guide me plz...

SAP Workflow not triggering due to "Start Condition return FALSE" message in SWEL

Hi,
I have SES approval workflow which is not triggering in few cases because of check function ends with exception even it has valid start condition and correct data. For example lets say we have PO no. 100 for which 3 SES (SES1,SES2 & SES3) are created. Out of which workflow for SES3 is not triggering even if all the three contain valid start condition(Bases on internal order at PO line item).when triggering workflow manually using SWUE for SES3 it work fine.Please find SWEL screenshot below and let me know if you have come across this type of issue.
Thanks in Advance.
Ishant.

kindly use SAP_WAPI_CREATE_EVENT and not SWE_EVENT_CREATE it's always better to use APIs.
Why use 2 sub-objects? you already have a z-object and you can modify it. even if there is a reason for the double sub object , the workflow should still run on the standard one - BUS2091.
see for example :
Extending Object Types: Inheritance and Delegation - SAP Business Workflow - SAP Library
As for your question,
if you are using a function module to raise the event, way not check in it if the service entry sheet has been created properly before creating the event. you can even check if the PO contains an internal order in your RFC function module and raise a specific event. then you will have no need for the starting condition.

After lots of tries, and going nowhere, I bit the bait and started a new library

Hi,
After going nowhere with my old B4.1 library, and spending too much time on it, I decided to start fresh, and just export the XMP files, as suggested by several people here.
After a failed attempt at exporting all of the 24,000 pictures XMPs (left the computer doing it at the night but when I came LR had crashed), I decided to export only the last year of photos (where adjustments were mostly made with LR). It took a while, failed to do that for 2 pictures (over 5,500 or so), but it finished.
So, yesterday I moved around the pictures in my HD (a reorder was needed anyway), and start the import... finished today, it gave some problems ("different files had different errors" but the errors were nowhere to be seen, I believe some of them are related to PSD without the compatibility flag, but without the exact error that LR is seeing, it's really hard to know, or worse, to fix it - another thing that IMHO needs to be solved) with some files, but almost all of the photos were in.
I had also been thinking about using DNG for a long while (I always use raw in my camera, a 20D and previously a Digital Rebel)... and this morning I decided to convert all of my library to DNG. It's been working for a big while (Activity Monitor displays 4 hours and a half of CPU time for LR), after a crash when doing the first 1,500 or so. Anyway, it has still maybe 65% of my library to go, so it's going to take easily all day. Fortunately this operation uses several threads/processors, not like the exporting of XMP, that seems to use only one, which is... well... 1/4 of the processing power of my mac :-) (hint hint Adobe!)
Anyway, let's hope tomorrow I can finally start working and seeing the new things that the release version of LR has. Have read some reviews and parts of the manual, and it really looks promising.
Thanks Sean and Geoff for the help with my corrupted library, I still haven't got answer from Adobe customer service (no surprise here, I'm still waiting for response or at least aknowledge from a case I opened almost 15 days ago...), but maybe it's better starting with a new library than reimporting an old one in who knows what conditions...
Regards,
Rodrigo

Well... too late :-)... as I said, it only crashed me once, and I really don't know why. I see that another thread is running, "Acumulating metadata" that I would like to stop, but it doesn't seem to stop. So far everything has been running smoothly, so I expect the 65% that still needs processing will end correctly.
If I get some problem I'll with smaller batches... but I sure hope this ends by itself. I still get the creeps of thinking of going picture by picture as I did some days ago trying to fix my library import issues...

How to restrict the job start conditions (only "Immediate" type) ?

Hi,
We allow our users to schedule and execute in background mode transactions (example IP19, IW38). We gave them for that authorizations (object S_BTCH_JOB with LIST, PROT, RELE and SHOW - objetct S_PROGRAM with BTCSUBMIT).
We would like that users can schedule and execute their jobs only with the u201CImmediateu201D job start condition (in the Start Time screen for the type of start condition : Immediate, Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode).
Another solution: prohibit the scheduling and the execution background job in a certain time interval ...
How can restrict the job start conditions ?
Thank you.
Patrice.

Hi Jan,
Yes, sa38 makes it possible indeed to execute in background into immediate mode a job but
the user have to know the name of the program to be carried out ...
The user knows only the name of these transactions trade. For example, IW38.
In the menu of this transaction, SAP gives the possibility to execute in background :
Program --> Execute in Background --> display of Start Time screen for the type of start condition :
Immediate, Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode).
It is at this time there that we want that the user can only choose the "immediate" mode.
We must thus prohibit the other choices (Date/Time, After job, After event, or At operation mode) ... and
and we don't know how to restrict these other options in this screen "Start Time screen for the type of start condition".
Thank you.
By.

Error using a method call in the starting conditions of a Workflow

Hi,
In SRM 4, I have a doubt about a start condition with WFWS14000109 I need to trigger the WF depending on organizational unit of the requester (not purchase group or purchase organization).
I have seen in the editor, in SWB_COND in the part of requisitionerUser the Method ReadOrgUnit.
I change to traditional mode of the editor and when I select the method I get in Express1. field
&_EVT_OBJECT.REQUISITIONERUSER.READORGUNIT(_RESULT='OBEG';ACTORGUNIT= )&
If I use = and the organizational unit in express2 field I get error
Partial expression expected (expression '&_EVT_OBJECT_REQUISITIONERUSER.READORGUNIT(_RESULT',position 76)
Can anybody say me where is the error? how I should express the condition.
Thanks
Best Regards

I don't think you can use a BOR method in a condition. At least not as far as I know. I think it would be better to create a virtual attribute in your delegated subtype of BUS2121 and use that in the condition.
Regards,
Martin

How to stop and start MDBs to listen for JMS messages

Hello! This might be more of an architecture question rather than a technical questing, but I post it here, in the lack of a better place...
For several years I have been using Webster and Webster MQ to send messages back and forth to clients. The architecture for the middleware platform has been designed around the functionality of ListenerPorts. Listenerports is a Webster functionality that let you "stop" and start to listen to JMS messages for a given MDB either by admin console, or by JMX.
The arhitecture we used was something like this :
1.Client sends a persistent message to a queue. (order)
2. An MDB pics up the order message, calls a SessionBean that "fronts" the IIOP back end system.
This is quite "out of the box" architecture, but we used the Listenerports to solve a stability problem for our back end system.
The backEnd system was quite unstable, so the EJB threw an exception (typically because of timeout or connection refused) back to the MDB.
The Listenerport was "defined" to handle 3 errors before stopping, so the MDB resent the message twice before the listenerport automatically stopped. The nice thing about this feature was that the client could continue to send orders, and was not bothered when the back end system was down.
When the backEnd system was up and running, we could start the listenerport and it was all back to normal state. We even had a start script that checked the state of the listenerport every 30 minute, and started it automatically if it was stopped, making the admin task of starting the MDB unnecessary..
Now.. Why am I telling this story..
I would like to know how this could be done using "clean" J2EE technologies..That is..Not using any technology that is not portable..
I`m playing with glassfish at home, and it struck me that there is nothing in the J2EE spec that defines the functionality described above ? Am i missing something ?
I Do not want to stop My application because the back end system is down? That is the only way (i know of) that i can "stop" to listen for messages..
I can put all the messages on an error queue when the backbend system is down, but that would lead to more code just to handle the error messages. Maybe the easiest way to solve this is to "move" (programmatically) all messages from the error queue over to the "standard" queue every XX minute, but somehow that sounds "wrong"
Can anyone give me some advice to how this problem situation should be solved ? I`m interested in the solution both from an architectural perspective and from a more technical perspective..
Best regards
Hans-Jacob Melby

Breakpoints, whether normal or conditional, are just meant for debugging of your code. I had the sense from your question that the pausing you want to do is a part of normal operation of your code. I would NOT recommend using a breakpoint for that situation. It would bring up the block diagram showing the breakpoint when it occurs. A user besides the programmer would not know what to do in that case.
Yes, both the inner and outer loops would have shift registers.
Putting a case structure with a small while loop inside the "Pausing Case" is doable. It just depends on what you are doing or waiting for while the program operation is "paused".

Add "cost center" query to a start condition?

Hi there,
we got a new requirement for one of our plants.
We're on SRM 5.0 classic scenario.
Is it possible to add a "cost center" query to a specific start condition (SWB_PROCUREMENT) of a workflow?
E.g. if a user uses cost center 4711 for a shopping cart item a specific cost center responsible xyz should approve this item.
If the user uses another cost center 4712 for a second item in this shopping cart this item should be approved by another cost center responsible abc.
Is that somehow possible ?
So far I did not find a suitable expression for cost center.
Thanks in advance for your answers.
Best regards,
Henning

Hi Masa,
thanks for your answer. Perhaps you also have a hint for the following:
I can't really find in the metioned thread or in note 731637 what happens if a SC with several items is partially approved.
Example:
SC with 3 items:
item 1 cc 1000
item 2 cc 2000
item 3 cc 1000
Let's say item 1+3 have been approved by the approver found by badi and WS14500015. Is a PO or a purchase requisition created in backend? Or is it only created after the whole SC has been approved (i.e. also item 2).
Thanks for a hint and best regards,
Henning

How to find the start condition of a ABAP program?

Hello Gurus!,
Could any one please explain how to find the start condition of a ABAP program?
like its a event based or time based?and also how to find that event and time..
Thanks in Advance...
Dinakar

Hi Dinkar,
Go to Job Schedule, put Job Step parameter as your program and see scheduled Job.
In Schedule Job double click to see start condition. and steps to see details and variant.
Hope it helps.
Thanks
CK

WS10000276 and start condition

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for