Wsh_new_deliveries , wsh_delivery_details , wsh_delivery_ assignments

Hi all,
Can anybody tell when wsh_new_deliveries,wsh_delivery_details & wsh_delivery assignments populate?
and join condition between them ?
Thanks in advance

SELECT
FROM
oe_order_lines_all ool
, wsh_delivery_Details wdd
, wsh_new_deliveries wnd
, wsh_delivery_assignments wda
WHERE 1=1
AND wdd.source_header_id = ool.header_id
AND wdd.source_line_id = ool.line_id
AND wda.delivery_detail_id = wdd.delivery_detail_id
AND wda.delivery_id = wnd.delivery_id
http://sureshvaishya.blogspot.com

Similar Messages

Inventory transaction:ship sales order to the customers

I know there is Receiving Transactions in docs of inventory user Guide.but I don't know how to use when ship sales order to the customers

You don't ... because you're shipping, not receiving, unless you are referring to drop shipments which contain a logical receipt element.
Instead you should be looking at the WSH shipping schema in the relevant eTRM and tables such as:
wsh_new_deliveries
wsh_delivery_details
wsh_delivery_assignments
wsh_picking_batches
wsh_trip_stops
wsh_delivery_legs
wsh_trips
Regards,
Jon

How to avoid the FTS on WSH_delivery_details.

Hi,
The following below query, when i executed this query was taking more time due to the FTS on WSH_delivery_details.
Pleae let me know, is there any other tables to join with this table to avoid FTS...
SELECT b.NAME "Org", source_header_number "Order Number",
source_line_number "Line Number",
TRUNC (last_update_date) "Last Update Date"
FROM wsh_delivery_details a, hr_operating_units b
WHERE released_status = 'C'
AND oe_interfaced_flag = 'N'
AND TRUNC (last_update_date) BETWEEN TRUNC (SYSDATE - 10)
AND TRUNC (SYSDATE - 1)
AND a.org_id = b.organization_id
ORDER BY source_header_number, source_line_number
Thanks,
Sathish

Have not checked for column name errors..here are the SQLs..
SELECT b.NAME, source_header_number, source_line_number, TRUNC (a.last_update_date)
FROM wsh_delivery_details a, hr_operating_units b, wsh_delivery_assignments c, wsh_trip_stops d, wsh_delivery_legs e
WHERE released_status = 'C'
AND oe_interfaced_flag = 'N'
AND TRUNC *(d.actual_departure_date)* BETWEEN TRUNC (SYSDATE - 10) AND TRUNC (SYSDATE - 1)
AND a.org_id = b.organization_id
AND a.delivery_detail_id = c.delivery_detail_id
AND c.delivery_id = e.delivery_id
AND e.pick_up_stop_id = d.stop_id
ORDER BY source_header_number, source_line_number
OR
initial_pickup_date is what goes to update the order lines as actual_shipment_date and is indexed.
SELECT b.NAME "Org", source_header_number "Order Number",
source_line_number "Line Number",
TRUNC (last_update_date) "Last Update Date"
FROM wsh_delivery_details a, hr_operating_units b,wsh_delivery_assignments c,wsh_new_deliveries d
WHERE released_status = 'C'
AND oe_interfaced_flag = 'N'
AND TRUNC *(d.initial_pickup_date)* BETWEEN TRUNC (SYSDATE - 10)
AND TRUNC (SYSDATE - 1)
AND a.org_id = b.organization_id
and a.delivery_detail_Id=c.delivery_detail_id
and c.delivery_id=d.delivery_id
ORDER BY source_header_number, source_line_number
Thanks
Nagamohan

Need to find a calendar to schedule multiple assignments with multiple tasks set on specific days for multiple people

There may be no such animal as what I am searching for, but I thought I'd give it a try.
What I need to do is find a calendar app that allows me to have individual calendars for staff members that I can place a several-days-long assignment and have those people access remotely on an iPad or iPhone (autosync).
I also want to be able to have tasks set on specific days within that assignment that have alerts/reminders for each stage of the assignment.
Being able to custom colour each individual assignment (not just the person's own calndar) is also necessary, as these asignments overlap and need to be easily distinguishable at a glance. Each assignment needs to be its own entity and not affect any furture or previous entries, even if I choose the same colour.
It needs to be in a month by month view and be able to be something each person can subscribe to and sync up with for changes on a daily basis. It does nothave to be a calendar like in the screen shot below, it could be a linear calendar that has days across the top and assignments down the left side.....
Here is a screen shot of a rudimentary excel spreadsheet I have been using. It is awkward and becoming unmanageable as the number of assigments increases and more staff are being added on. And I must send a new spreadsheet out every time I make a change or add an assignment, which is several times a week.
I suspect I may be asking for the world, but if anyone knows a direction I can go in to start a search, I'd be grateful. I haven't had success of my own so far and need to find something soon.
iCal doesn't work for me due to the fact I can only colour code the calendar itself and not the event, plus not being able to have multiple tasks within one event. And the qty of assignments I'd have would see most getting lost, eliminating my abilty to see every staff member's assignmanet at the same time.
Thank you in advance if you have a suggestion and if not, thanks for looking at my dilemma!

check with T-code TPM44
zashok

Cell assignments in Model clause

Hi,
I have a table TEST_DATA with YEAR,FIELD,VALUE as columns.
The VALUE1 , VALUE2, VALUE 3 columns are determined based on the field values. If the data is as follows
YEAR FIELD VALUE
2010 1 11111
2010 2 22222
2010 3 33333
Can I get the output as follows using model clause.
YEAR VALUE1 VALUE2 VALUE3
2010 11111 222222 333333
2009 23243 533635 343434
2008 34343 364653 343434
2007 34345 789879 343434
I don't want to use pivot as I have to perform some computations on the above value columns. So I tried the following query using model clause
and value1,value2,value3 are coming in 3 different rows.
How do I write cell assignments to get the value 1,value 2,value 3 in the same row?
SELECT YEAR, VALUE 1,VALUE 2, VALUE 3
FROM TEST_FIN_DATA
MODEL
RETURN UPDATED ROWS
MAIN simple
PARTITION BY (YEAR)
DIMENSION BY (FIELD)
MEASURES (VALUE VALUE1, VALUE VALUE2, VALUE VALUE3 )
RULES
(value1['1'] = value1['1'] ,
value[('2'] = value['2'],
value['3'] = value['3']);

with data as (
select 2010 y, 1 f, 11111 v from dual union all
select 2010, 2, 222222 from dual union all
select 2010, 3, 333333 from dual union all
select 2009, 1, 111111 from dual union all
select 2009, 2, 222222 from dual union all
select 2009, 3, 333333 from dual
select y, v1, v2, v3 from
data
model
return updated rows
partition by (y)
dimension by (f)
measures (v, 0 v1, 0 v2, 0 v3)
rules(
v1[0]=v[1]
,v2[0]=v[2]
,v3[0]=v[3]
order by y desc
Y;V1;V2;V3
2010;11111;222222;333333
2009;111111;222222;333333compare to the query without return updated rows.
Trick is v?[0] creates a new (PIVOT-)row for every partition.
regards
Edited by: chris227 on 27.06.2012 06:15

Add Operating Unit Field in Assets Assignments Window

Hi everyone, I have a query to add an Operating Unit filed in Assignments window which would be only used for information purposes and have not to do with financial information. I want to make myself clear that; 1) If I add a segment in Location FF, which has already 3 segments; OUC,Department, and Area. Is this location FF data have to do with financial information or if I add a segment then will it impact on financial/ accounting flow. 2) If I use the DFF at Assignments window, then how can I add it, what is the segment name in DFF segments definitions. We have 3 Operating Units; a. South b. North c. Central Please suggest me in this regard

Sinan,
Converting to Multiple Organizations architecture is required before R12 upgrade -- Please see (Page 2-5, Step 3: Convert to Multiple Organizations architecture (required)) in the upgrade manual.
Please also see the (Page 1-19, Multiple Organizations (Multi-Org)) section.
Oracle E-Business Suite Upgrade Guide Release 11i to 12.1.1 [ID 1082375.1]
R12: Upgrade Considerations by Product (FINANCIALS) [ID 889733.1]
FAQ - Multiple Organizations Architechure (Multi-Org) [ID 165042.1]
Thanks,
Hussein

Analysis Authorization (Role, Profile and Direct Assignments)

Analysis Authorization Question:
1) In BW 3.x environment, customers have used Role Maintenance Process to assign proper object level security and then assign to the users.
2) Most of the places R/3 security team takes over support/administration function of BI Security and they continue to use Role method to assign Reporting Authorizations as per the process defined in BW 3.x system.
3) Customer sometime have 100 + Roles to have 3.X Reporting Authorizations. This is Managed, assigned, approved using role concept.

Migration Options:
1) New Analysis Authorization makes process of Role Maintenance like "hierarchy authorizations" of BW 3.x. You have to create Value in other transactions and assign them in Role as a pointer or link object. With Analysis Authorization concept, Actual value of the Object Assigned Like Company code 1100 not visible in Role Maintenance PFCG transactions. It is only visible in Transaction code RSECADMIN.
2) Analysis Migration Tool - RSEC_MIGRATION does not update ROLES. It creates or changes PROFILES.
3) Profiles are assigned to the users and Roles does not reflect any Impact by Analysis Authorization migration.
Questions
a) This means customer need to update all the roles by hand. If they want to use Roles to manage the assignment of the Security to users. Migration Tool does not update Roles, it only updates PROFILES.
b) Does any one use direct assignment to Users? It is good business practice?
c) Is Profiles recommended method of Authorization Maintenance?
d) Can we run migration tool to create Analysis Authorizations, but not assign to the users as a Profile. But stop at creating Analysis Authorizations. If Customer wants to use Roles maintenance process then, they can do not have delete profile assignments from all users before updating Roles using Analysis Authorizations.
Just want to check how other folks have done migration that can be supported going forward.
Pankaj Gupta

Hey Pankaj,
In general, assigning the analysis authorization directly to user makes a lot of sense for granular levels of authorization. For example, if you had 3,000 users, 3,000 specific authorization combinations, and 3,000 roles, using roles is a lot of additional overhead. If you had 12 roles and 3,000 users, your role concept makes a lot of sense.
Therefore, the recommendation is that it varies on what makes the most sense logically. Authorization groups can be created to group analysis authorizations and combine them. Also, you have the ability to generate analysis authorizations using the Content Datastores for this. That is an option as well.
RSEC_MIGRATION does use profiles as you've stated. If you want, there would be manual work to convert to roles afterwards. In case you haven't seen Marc's presentation on security, it's pretty good and covers how to generate authorizations from the datastore.
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/servlet/prt/portal/prtroot/docs/media/uuid/ac7d7c27-0a01-0010-d5a9-9cb9ddcb6bce

Open Tickets - No Active Assignments

Hello -
I have been asked to create a report with tickets that are "Open" and have no "Active Assignments".
Most tickets that are "Open" have at leaset one "Active" assignment. They want to find tickets that are open, but do not have any "Active Assignments" so they can issue an assignment for the ticket.
I need help with this please, as this calls for more than just basic skills. Any suggestions or tips would be appreciated.
A ticket can have multiple assignments - some assignments can be "Closed" or some can be "Active".
I have used (see below) these in the Record Selection to isolate these tickets but it's not taking. For example, ticket 1175373 has five assignments, 2 are "Active" and 3 are "Closed". This ticket is on the report because it fullfills the record selection code - it has three assignments that are "Closed". But the 2 active assignments are being ignored - so really according to the code below this report should not be on the report.
But, I would like tickets to be on the report if they are "Open" and have no "Active" assignments. Another example would be that a ticket would be on the report if it was "Open" and it had 3 "Closed" assignments and no "Active" assignments.
Date ({CallLog.RecvdDate}) in Lastfullmonth and
{CallLog.CallStatus} = "Open" and
{Asgnmnt.AssignStatus} <> "Active"
Please clink this link to view the report.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/flbpy40ai3j9bdw/Open%20Tickets%20No%20Active%20Assignments%206.10.2014.PNG
Thanks.
G.

Hi -
I have followed your suggestions and here are the results...
For example...ticket 1167818 should not be on the report because it has 1 active assignment and 5 closed assignments. Ticket 1167848 should not be on the report either - it has 2 active tickets and 3 closed tickets. And ticket 1167858 has 1 Active assignment and 3 closed assignments. These are probably on the report because of their closed assignments. Because they have Active asssignments too, they should not be on the report.
Tickets should only be on the report if they are Open and have no Active Assignment - they can have closed assignments.
I added {CallLog.CallStatus} = "Open" to the record selection and I have a formula {Asgnmnt.AssignStatus} <> "Active" under the column "NotActive". I have also removed some columns that are not really needed for developing this report.
Please click this link to review the report.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/1ptev5ttgxdp5s2/Open%20No%20Active%20Assignment%20Ticket%20Report.rpt
Thx.
G.

SAP R/3 : Indirect Role assignments - Is position unique to every user?

Hi.
While am exploring /learning SAP R/3 roles and auth, I would appreciate if I could get clarity on the following :
This link on SDN on Indirect role assignments are very informative.
http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/f03e6f6c-8c16-2a10-1581-ed8812e2effe
This link is also more explanatory : http://my.affinitext.com/public/book/5442/-1/1423831
So if my understanding is correct, it is better to assign roles - indirectly by position, so that if an employee's position changes, his role can be removed, based on position again ??? And somewhere we are linking with infotype 105.
My only doubt is : if we are going to assign roles by position and remove the roles by position, so that as the position of an employee changes, the previous roles become null and void and new roles can be assigned as per new position.
So would like to know :
as to whether this position number which we see from PA20, is unique to every user on the system ?
So that, if there is a need to remove a role based on postion, we could remove the role from PO13;
BY doing that, then will it not affect other users ?
Can somebody help me understand this.
Because if i want to see the effect immediately, if i go to PFUD and put the role name and say execute, i see that the role which was removed from PO13 is gone immediately from the user.
Many thanks
Indu
Edited by: Indumathy Narayanan on Nov 22, 2011 9:25 AM

GOT IT THANKS.
Hi Prashant.
Good morning and wishes.
Can you please help me understand this.
I understand from HR person that position is uniquely defined (from hire to retire)
and roles are generally given based on position.
However, I see a person : whose roles have been assigned as per position all these years.
He had 2 roles in project A. He now moved into a different project B.
But. when i check, i still see the roles - reflecting on SU01 & well as in the tab of user of the role X under pfcg.
BUT when i check PO13 - and put the position / relationship and say overview.
I dont see the roles at all there.
Why this is so. Why the discrepancy on different screens.
Also How can I get a confirmation that - these roles are actually removed and is not there for the user.
Rather.
How could the removal of roles based on position become completely effective on the system.
So that all screens display the same information.
Also would like to know - whether it is ok to remove the role expiry date directly from PFCG/ROLE Display/user tab/select user/
and then make the role invalid or expired / or extend the expiry.
Many thanks.
Indu
Edited by: Indumathy Narayanan on Dec 7, 2011 12:09 PM
Edited by: Indumathy Narayanan on Dec 7, 2011 1:42 PM
Edited by: Indumathy Narayanan on Dec 7, 2011 5:17 PM

How to delete multiple assignments sharing the same application_id

Hi,
I encountered an issue where an employee is having two active assignments.
Both assignment_id share the same application_id. User might have created additional application accidentally.
Upon hired, one of the assignment_id changed status to 'active assignment' and the other one is still 'Accepted/New hire' status.
Therefore this has caused the employee to have 'employee.applicant' status.
The assignment can be deleted if the employee is cancel hired and status is 'applicant'. But the record has been created last year and has several assignments since then.
I'm looking for a way to delete the assignment without changing the employee status from 'employee' to 'applicant'.
How can i delete the 'Accepted/New hire' assignment and change the employee status to 'Employee.ex-applicant'?
Thanks in advance.
Edited by: lian on Jul 28, 2010 10:39 PM

This doesn't quite work as it displays all of the tracks that have been duplicated, including the originals, meaning I would delete all of the copies and no longer have those songs, or still have to go in manually for everything.
I also tried displaying the date added for everything, hoping iTunes had made the copies on different days, but everything was added and copied on the same day, so I wasn't able to differentiate the files that way, either.
HELP!

Can you assign MIDI instrument parameters as MIDI CC assignments (quantize, transposition, etc)?

Hello!
Is it possible to assign MIDI controller CC assignments in a way that will allow me to control the following Logic MIDI instrument parameters via knobs on my MIDI controller?
I would love to have control over the following parameters with whatever track or MIDI region is selected:
Quantize
Transposition
Velocity
Delay
My Akai LPD8 is begging me to be able to assign these parameters as CC events with the Akai LPD8 controller editor software.
It might seem silly, but being able to twist a knob to control toggling between these drop-down parameters would make for some intuitive, hands-on creative control while in performance/creation mode, or really as a means to audition different ideas. Why should these tools be only for tedious editing?
I understand that I wouldn't be able to record these event changes as MIDI automation data, but they would be great to get a feel of what I am looking for during creative sessions.
Anyone know if this is possible? I didn't see that it was obvious to do so, though I am just getting into mapping my custom controls with Logic.
Thanks so much!

Thanks for the reply....
I actually tried freezing the software instrument track and that had little if no effect on CPU. I then read in the book or somewhere that the freeze function really only works on effect plugins. Don't know if that's true in all cases, but that seems to be what's happening. Still would like to combine these tracks and I'm guessing I'm going to have to get creative with bussing or subgroups to make this happen. Unfortunately I think the fact that my Presonus board has hardmapped output routings for all the inputs makes that difficult, but haven't actually tried yet. I'm thinking if I can reroute the midi modules audio output input into the Presonus to a subgroup and then route the software instrument plug in to the same subgroup that I can then mix/capture this and hopefully route the audio's input to the subgroup to pick up the mix.
Does this make sense to anybody reading this?
We'll see and I'll post the results if it works....
thanks...b

Error while Saving in /SAPAPO/MC77 - Maintain Selection Assignments

Hi All,
While saving selection assignments for users in SAP APO Demand Planning through the Transaction code /SAPAPO/MC77
I am getting an information message whenever I click the save button
"Inconsistency identified during save
Message no. /SAPAPO/MA863"
This error message is only for the planning book belonging to a specific planning area.
What can be done to resolve this issue?

Hello,
There should be duplicated entries in your selections.
You can set a BP in Form check_single_profile in program /SAPAPO/LMCPSFC2 in the debugger.
Check parameter lt_tsselorg_ext[].
For the entries in lt_tsselorg_ext[]. the 'ORDERKEY' field must be continous and no duplicate.
Please delete the inconsistent ones.
Best Regards,
Ada

MDM Data Manager Assignments using Dates

Hello.
I am trying to create some assignments that default to a certain date and my expressions are getting the error message when I execute them.
I am currently trying to create an Assignment for the Look-up table: Valid To (which belongs to the QT: Sales Data).
I want the Valid To Assignment to default at the date 12/31/2999 if the user did not already enter a value.
My expression looks like this:
IF (IS_NULL(Sales Data.Valid To), SYSTIME(0) = 12/31/2999)
I linked Sales Data for my 'Table Field'
Any Ideas?
Points awarded promptly for any help!
Thanks,
Nichole

Hi,
As per my knowledge, writing Assignments on Qualified Table field within the Main table is not possible for both Qualifier as well as Non-Qualifier Field. As if you want to write Assignment on Non-Qualifier fields only then you can do while selecting Qualified table as your Current Table not as Main table.
For Qualifier field too if you want to asign field using Main table is not Possible as you cant select Property Table Field as Valid to here you could only able to select all Main table fields and fields which is look up to this Qualified table and other Sub tables.
Don't confuse with other subtables.
Other assignments that i've made work with just the 'sales data' table field even though there is a lookup table within that Q.T.
That's why as you could get values for all other subtables in Assignment Expression as lookups tab if you remember like Reconcillation but here you could not find field who look up to your Qualified Table as well as Qualified table. there indirectly u r refering field to this lookup table and you get values here to assign but how could you assign value to Valid to field just think even if this is must requirement for you then you create one more subtable and look up this valid to field to this subtable or just create one more field Valid to in maintable of type text.
So from my point of view this is only drawback that we could not Assign Value to Qualified table field. I hope it will help you in understanding. But writing Validations for Qualified Table fields is Possible but not Assignments. May be in MDM 7.1 its possible. This is my knowledge about Writing Expressions for Qualified Table Fields till now.
Hope it will Help you,
Rewards if found Useful.....
Thanks,
Mandeep Saini

Error while deleting assignments in CL24N TCode

Dear MM Gurus,
We are facing problems in PO Release Strategy.
We had various values in Release (Groups, Codes, Strategies) and Workflow assignments in QA and DEV.
Since we received requirement for new Release Strategy, some of the old ones were not required which we deleted in DEV Golden Master client. We did retain some of the old Release Groups, Codes and Strategies.
We then transported the above to QA server.
Subsequently, in QA we directly changed values of characteristics, defined users in Business workflow to cater to new Workflow assignments.
While testing PO creation, all the scenarios are correctly working except for one Purchasing group which is picking up one Release Strategy CC/C3 which does not exist in spro. While checking CL24N for class assignments, we found the CC/C3.
Now the issue is we cannot delete this CC/C3 from CL24N. Also the Purchase order though getting saved with incorrect Release Strategy (Inconsistent), we cannot prepare MIGO as it is not released.
Pls. suggest how this should be resolved.
Thanks
M

Hi,
This is happening because already your PO has picked up the released strategy with reference to the assignment. Since you have already made changes to the codes pertaining to this release strategy, PO is unable to pick up the same. You need to delete the release status for this particular PO through table entry. Try doing this through SE16N -> EKKO -> type &sap_edit in the dialog box. This will allow u to edit the table entry. Delete the release status and get the PO back to the not-released status. You need to make some changes in the PO then with reference to your current characteristics which will force the PO to pick up the new strategy.
Hope this works.
Regards,
Rahul.

Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items

Hi All,
I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
For line item 10 -
1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
How can i create the same...
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prasanthi

Dear Prithviraj,
CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
thanks
Regards,
Weng

Wsh_new_deliveries , wsh_delivery_details , wsh_delivery_ assignments

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for