XE and EE on same company

Hi,
I want to know if there are limitations of use at a depepartament level XE version if alredy EE is in use on the company.
thanks

There is no conflict.
XE may be deployed in the same environment as EE. Everything I read indicates the licenses are compatible.
The difficulty, if any, is technical - assuming traditional Oracle Networking access, at the least you need a different 'Service name' in the connect string. This may extend to different Oracle Homes and other means of separating the two sets if software and connection paths.
If you are technically comfortable with such separation, there is no issue ... I have several systems that house XE (production), Personal Edition (production) and EE (developer license) at the same time.

Similar Messages

  • Product Costing - Two Costing Variants - Mark and Release In Same Company Code Same Period

    Hi All,
    We are currently handling a CO-PC project where client has requirement to use two different costing variants in the same period in the same company code. SAP standard does not allow use of two costing variants in the same period for the same company. We can have only One Costing Variant per Co Code for Marking / Releasing Standard Price. 
    There are some materials in Plant 1 or Plant 2 for which cost estimates using costing variant ABC1 calculated and than prices are marked and released (CK24), now same materials are received in Plant3 where mixed costing is used and thus need to have cost estimates from second costing variant ABC3 (second costing variant) marked and released. Object is to have ABC3 cost estimates in material master standard price field, but SAP does not allow to mark and release for second costing variant in the same period for same co code as ABC1 variant already ran for plant1 or Plant2 under same company code,therefore, business is not able update ABC3 prices in Standard price of the material master. 
    Purpose of this second costing variant mark and release run is that for some materials business would like to implement costing at Plant3 level also, where they get same materials from different production sites (Plants). At Plant3 level, business is using mixed costing where the standard price is a weighted Average standard price, taking the different production sites standard cost into consideration in combination of the volume split between those production sites.
    Did any one worked on this kind of requirement? Is there any SAP standard way to handle? Or this will need some ABAP enhancement?
    Kindly advise.

    Hi Atul
    1. You dont need separate Valuation Variant in Plant 3
    2. Use Costing Variant ABC1 and ensure that it has the needed Valuation Strategies in Valuation Variant
    Allow Complete Transfer in the Transfer Control i.e. Cross Plant Transfer in it
    3. Assign the Qty Str Type you have used in ABC3, to ABC1.. i.e. In the Costing Version, assign the Qty Str Type to the Costing Type and Valuation Variant from ABC1
    After this, do CK11N and CK24 for Plant 1
    Then do CK11N and CK24 for Plant 3, using ABC1.. You dont need to change anythiing before doing CK11N for Plant 3
    To make it simple, you can use any one of ABC1 or ABC3 in both the plants.. You only need to ensure that Valuation Variant, TRansfer Control are set up as desired
    Br. Ajay M

  • I bought an iphone 5 about 4 months ago and got applecare. yesterday I had to get on a different plan within the same company so i traded in my phone and got a new iphone 5. can i transfer my applecare to this new phone or would I have to buy it again?

    I bought a 16gb iphone 5 about 3 months ago and got applecare. yesterday I had to get on a different plan within the same company so i traded in my phone and got a new 32gb iphone 5. can i transfer my applecare to this new phone or would I have to buy it again?

    As this is a WW forum with different AppleCrare offerings you need to specify which Country
    as in North America has AppleCare+ and everywhere else AppleCare ,very different products
    So to avoid incorrect guidance suggest you specify Country

  • STO-Within same company code and same sales organisation

    hi freinds
    i need steps for STO Within same company code and same sales organisation "xyz" with different plant "X " and  " Y"
    with regards
    dinesh

    Hi,
    Sales organization is linked to sending plant. It does not matter if receiving plant is using the same or different sales organization. The setup from sending plant is independent from that.
    As for the STO standard setup, I suggest you search SDN first. Below example link.
    STO setup article link:
    http://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/index?rid=/library/uuid/c05e2251-91f0-2c10-4e91-e919468e4687
    Regards,
    Dominik Modrzejewski

  • HT2486 When you want to add another person from same company, how can you duplicate and then modify the card already entered?

    When usinf Mac Address Book and you have entered the information for one contact from a company, how can you duplicate the card so you can add another person from same company?

    I'm afraid the LU suffix is a new one on me.
    As long as you have all of the content in your library then that remove and sync warning shouldn't cause any loss of data, but it shouldn't be happening every time. It may pay to take the following steps to reset the connection between the two,
    Backup device.
    Restore as a new device.
    Restore the backup made earlier.
    Again, this assumes all content on the device is in your library. If that isn't the case see Recover your iTunes library from your iPod or iOS device first.
    tt2

  • SAP ProductCosting in parallel by plant (same company) with ECC6.0 and EHP5

    Hi SAP Community,
    I did hear rumours that with ECC6.0 and EHP5 it is possible to execute product costing per plant in parallel, even the plants belong to the same company code. Currently, the lock is on company code level, means if I try to create a second background job with a plant belonging to the same company code, I am getting an error message.
    I checked the SAP release notes for EHP5 but didnt find any direct related information.
    Thanks

    Hi,
       Did you check note 1415153 ? This seems to explain the new functionality
    regards
    Waman

  • Plant to Plant STO with excise invoice and taxes in one company code

    Hi,
    I have a new business requirement, we want to create only one company code and 12 plants in different states,  each plant will have separate purchasing and sales activity this is ok this can be done with separate excise and series group as ther will not be any issue for purchsing and saling of materisl with exice in each plant , but how we can transfer the material plant to plant  if the plant is in different states we want that the material should be transfer from palnt to plant  with excise invoice only,  as we have the company code common,  how to create the billing document for this, and how to pass the duty from the saling plant and capture the same in the recieving plant. with proper tax entry. Can we do the STO with biiling if the two plants are in single compnay code.
    regards,
    zafar

    hi,
    I am trying to create a Stock Transport Order (STO) with document type UB and item category U. My objective is to transfer material from Plant (supplying plant) 100 to Plant (receiving plant) 1100 within one company code (1000) with STO.
    For this purpose I created a raw material 1434 in plant 1000 with sales org 1 view and in that view entered in delivering plant field 1000 as delivery plant. After that I extended material 1434 to plant 1100 without changing anything what I did while creating the material first in Plant 1000 except in organizational level I entered 1100 in the plant field. I entered Sales org 1000 and distribution channel 10 in organization level for both plant while creating and extending the material. In me21n I chose Stock Transport Order with document type UB and item category as U also receiving Plant as 1100. With this when I tried to save the STO the message, I am getting an error,  Cannot determine shipping data for the material 1434? 
    I am doing solely mm function why I need to create Customer master? In this case plant 1100 is the customer right? 
    Solution:
    1. Mat.(1434) should be maintained in both the plants. (1000&1100).
    2. Should have enough stock in supplying plant(1000).
    3. Make its supplying plant as a vendor in vendor master record in receiving plant(1100).
    4. Make it receiving plant as a customer in customization.  
        Create customer (xd01) & and define the shipping data for plants in both the plants.
        Path: spro u2013 img u2013 m.mgmt u2013 purchasing u2013 po u2013 set up STO u2013 define shipping data (1 by1 )
        In Receiving plant (1100)                         In Supplying plant (1000)
        Customer num.  123345 (for ex.)              Customer num.  -
    (don't fill) 
        Sales org.yyy                                                  
        Dist. Channel                                                              
        Sales div.  y   
    5. Assign doc. Type is "NL" for intra company STO. If  STO is inter company, Assign doc. Type is "NLCC".
        Position doc type is "UB"
        Enter supplying plant(1000) & doc type (NL) & checking rule (ex:01)
    6. Assign doc. Type is "UB" to u'r plants.(PO)
        Go for new entries 
        Enter supplying plant(1000) & Receiving plant (1100) & doc type (UB).
    7. Create a PO, choose the doc type is `UB' & item cat.'U', Enter supplying plant as a vendor in PO  of the receiving plant(1100).
    8. Provide this num (PO) to SD people, they will do the delivery by using transactional code is VL10B.
    9. Sales people they will provide "out bound delivery num".
    10. Do the GR. In GR the second tab 05 out bound delivery instead of PO mov.type 101.
    11. See the stock over view in the receiving & supplying plants.  
    thanking you

  • Restrict proforma invoice without doing pgi in STO(same company code)

    Hi Gurus',
    I am creating STO (same company code) from Exciseable Plant to Non Exciseable Plant.
    For that i am creating ME21N> VL10B>VL02N(PICKING & PGI)>VF01(Proforma Invoice)>J1IIN>
    Now problem arises ---
    I am able to create Proforma Invoice without doing PGI.
    Now i want to restrict proforma invoice creation with out doing PGI.
    What config require for this.
    Regards
    Santanu

    Check your copy controls fromT. Code: VTFL - Copy-Control Settings b/w Delivery-to-Pro forma  say, F8 -- LF
    Settings at Header for the combination equal copying requirements 003 Header/dlv.-related and at Item category copying requirements 004 Deliv-related item

  • How do I add a contact from the same company to my address book?

    How do I add a contact from the same company to my address book? I do not want to re-type all of the information. Thanks for your help.

    Any card in your address book can be duplicated. Select the card within the Name column, and use the Edit > Copy menu item followed by the Edit > Paste menu item. Then you can update the card copy and only change the name/email/phone fields as needed.

  • Inspection Lot Not Triggered for STO - One Plant to other Plant in same Company

    Dear SAP Gurus,
    We have a scenario of STO for one plant to other plant with in the same company code.
    The process is being followed as follows ;
    1. We create stock transfer by creating P.O thru ME21N
    2. Create Outbound delivery thru VL10B
    3. Doing PGI & Picking thru 'VL02N. Thru movement type '641'
    The QM settings are as follows to trigger an inspection lot
    1. Inspection lot origin '08' activated in MM.
    2. Quality plan is defined and task list is released.
    3. 'VL02N' is defined thru 'OMJJ' for movemrnt type '641'.
    But while doing PGI no inspection lot is created.
    Our requirement is to trigger a inspection lot and Invoicing / Billing only possible after inspection lot Approval.
    Please advice.
    Thanks

    Hi
    As per my understanding  inspection type 10 should be activated in QM view material master.
    Can you please check the below thread and also check some similar threads.
    QUALITY INSPECTION FOR OUTBOUND DELIVERY
    I hope your problem will be resolved or else revert with your observation.
    Regards
    D Mohanty

  • Posting only possible in periods 2011/11 and 2011/10 in company code 4000

    Hi All Experts,
    I have encountered with this error while doing MIGO.
    Posting only possible in periods 2011/11 and 2011/10 in company code 4000
    Message no. M7053
    Diagnosis
    The posting date entered is not within one of the permitted posting periods (current period/previous period).
    This can be due to one of two reasons:
    The correct current period has not been set in the system.
    For the system, the first of the entered periods is the current period. At the beginning of a new period, your systems administrator must change the current period in the material master record, using the function "Shift periods". This has not yet been done.
    You have entered a wrong date in the field "Posting date".
    Procedure
    Check the posting date and correct it if necessary. If your input is correct, inform your systems administrator that the "period shifting" (period-end closing) process has not yet been completed.
    I have checked OB52, OB29, OB37, MMPV, MMRV. All possible T.codes and threads I tried from SDN itself, still no luck ! In OB52 I have opened 2011 & 2012 year open absolute.
    Would like to share MMRV settings :-
    Current Period : 11 / 2011
    Previous Period : 10 / 2011
    Last period in prev year : 12 / 2010
    We have India based client so fiscal year variant is Apr to March copied from V3.
    Will be very much appreciable experts guidane !
    Regards,
    Sharvari Joshi.

    Hi All Experts,
    I raised the OSS, and here which I got the reply from SAP.
    There is a possibility to run the report RMMMINIT to initialize posting
    periods. Please bear in mind that the valuation data of the previous
    period could get affected.
    If you decide to proceed with the process, please review the
    documentation of program RMMMINIT.
    Please also review attached note 70545 regarding the initialization
    process. Although this note is NOT valid for your release, it provides
    good information on the use of initialization for correction purposes.
    Additionally, please review attached note 369637 in this regard as well.
    PLEASE FIRST PERFORM THIS IN A TEST/DEVELOPMENT SYSTEM PRIOR TO MOVING
    TO PRODUCTION AS YOUR VALUATION DATA FROM PREVIOUS PERIOD WILL BE
    AFFECTED. If you are satisfied with the results, then you can move it
    to production. Please perform this at your own risk as this hotline
    will not support any problems arising out of it.
    Related the error message MM016 please follow the steps from note
    487381:
    To reserve the parameter use transaction SU01 for the user's name who
    executes the RMMMINIT program. The parameter must be set as follows:
    Parameter Value
    MMPI_READ_NOTE YYYYMMDD (for the current date)
    I am not able make out any meaning out of it. Can anyone please understand me this ?
    Help will be appreciated !
    Reagrds,
    Sharvari Joshi.
    P.S : Steps from my side which I performed , I changed the parameters for my ID in SU01 to current date 2011.11.16 (YYYYMMDD) and running MMPI still same error.

  • External processing in the plant as vendor under same company code

    Hi friends,
    In our project under implementation we have following scenario.
    we have 4 plants under one company code. one of the plant does powder coating as manufacturing activity. Other 3 plants sends components to the powder coating plant for coating purpose.
    In IDES Standard scenario of external processing, a purchase requisition is raised thro info record maintained for the external operation. This scenarion works if the vendor is external.
    In our case, the vendor is one of the other plant under same company code/client. Also the powder coating needs to be done without any profit margin for internal customers.
    Our FICO guys have the opinion that, intra plant can't be a vendor; because raising invoices among plants under the same company codes is against accounting standars.
    If anybody has faced this type of scenario nd found the solution, Please share it here.
    Thanx in advance

    Hi Shiva
    STO scenario
    You can not create only STO as you need to send the unpainted components to another plant through SAP & have them painted back with only payment of paining charges without margin.
    Subcontracting scenario
    You can not create the Subcontracting PO as this is not your external vendor.
    Does this involves excise?
    Then the PR/PO ctreated should be of combination of STO and subcontracting. If so this is not possible, as item category is the only field in PR/PO that identifies it as STO and subcontracting. obiviously it cann't have 2 values.
    My suggesion on this as...
    Create a BOM for painted component with sp procurement key as produced in another plant(paining plant). this will have STO cretaed for paining plant. This will inturn cretae a production order in painitng plant.
    The BOM in painting plant will have the unpainted component with sp procurement key as produced in another plant ( fabricated plant) this will have STO created for unpainted components.
    I hope I am clear & not confused you much.
    Regards
    Mahesh
    Regards
    Mahesh

  • Restrict PO creation for multiple plants for same company code

    Hi Gurus,
    We want to restrict PO creation for multiple plants in the same company code. Based on Standard SAP settings for Purchasing organization assignment with multiple Plant and multiple Plant assignment with single company code, this is happening. Is there a way that we can restrict by doing some customization change.
    Any thoughts or ideas will be highly appreciating.
    Thanks and Best regards,
    Karun Kumar

    Hi,
    Said functionality is not available in SAP standard.
    To avoid the same ,i can suggest implement release strategy for PO,and then higher authority / commercial team can check created PO,if multiple plants available in single po then they have the option of rejection for the same.
    Or else check BADI-ME_PROCESS_PO_CUST,take the help from abapor and apply the restriction to select multiple plant in PO.
    Hope this will resolve your query,
    Thanks & Regards,
    Sandesh Sawant

  • How to avoid  save same employee name under same company name

    hi,
    i am doing flex4 web application with mxml tags,
    i am having one text box and one datagrid and one save button. text box having one company name, data grid having employee names.
    when i click save button which is placed in outside the datagrid it will save all the details.
    Now my requirement is text box having the same company name and when i enter same employee name in datagrid and click save button means it wont
    allow to save that record, and through msg box with some alerts.
    How to do this,
    Any suggession or snippet code are welcome
    Thanks ,
    B.venkatesan

    hi raghs,
    i want to add records in cloud.bt while adding the records if we enter existing record details and try to save again na it wont allow to that record.
    that time the alert box  should show this msg "This record is already existing record in cloud database.
    ex: one company name called mobile. i am adding a employee name called raja now i save this record,its data saved in     cloud DTO
      again try to add same employee name raja under the same compny means it should through error.
    I am give my code here please if any suggession tel.
    CODE:
    private function saveRecord():void
                refreshRecords();
                model.employeeDetailsReq=new EMPLOYEEDETAILS_DTO();
                    var lengthindex:uint=model.employeeDetailsReqRecordsList.length;
                    var i:int;
                    for (i = 0; i < lengthindex; i++)
                    if((model.employeeDetailsReqRecordsList.getItemAt(lengthindex).employ ee name==customerdet.selectedItem.employeename)&&
                         (model.employeeDetailsReqRecordsList.getItemAt(lengthindex).employeeN  umber==customerdet.selectedItem.employeeID)){
                        Alert.show("you cannot Add Same CustomerName and Invoiceno again");
    (when this line come the error through like this: Index '8' specified is out of bounds.
    else
    var dp:Object=employeedet.dataProvider;            
    var cursor:IViewCursor=dp.createCursor();
    var employeename:String = employeename.text;
             model.employeeDetailsReq.employename = employeename;
    model.employeeDetailsReq.employeeNumber=cursor.current.employeeID;
    var sendRecordToLocID:QuickBaseEventStoreRecord = new
                        QuickBaseEventStoreRecord(model.employeeDetailsReq, new
                            KingussieEventCallBack(refreshList))
                    sendRecordToLocID.dispatch();
    <mx:Button  id="btnAdd" x="33" y="419" enabled="false" label="Add" width="65"  fontFamily="Georgia" fontSize="12" click="saveRecord()"/>
    employeename and employeeID are datafields of datagrid. datagrid id=customerdet
    employeeDetailsReqRecordsList---recordlist of save records
    Thanks,
    B.venkatesan

  • Restrict users with the same company code

    Hi All,
      I have developed editable ALV which allows users to edit and delete records and save those changes in database.
    Input is Company Code , Document Number and Fiscal Year.
    Now I want to restrict multiple users trying to edit/delete records with same company code at a same time.
    Example:
    User A is editing records for company code 1250.
    If User B tries to access for same company code 1250 at the same time, it should return an
    error message saying “Table currently locked by User A”.
    and also want to restrict the records if multiple users are trying to edit/delete the same record at
    a same time,I should give an error message.
    Thanks,
    Arpita

    First perform some search on Lock Concept in online help (ABAP Programming (BC-ABA), The ABAP Programming Language, Saving Data Externally, Data Consistency, The SAP Lock Concept or The SAP Lock Concept (BC-CST-EQ), SAP Lock Concept)
    Then use or create thru SE11 a lock object for your table (keys must start with mandt + Bukrs, to not interfere with standard locks, e.g. EFBKPF, you may create your own z-structure and an associated lock object) and before reading data check the company code is not yet locked with ENQUEUE FM, release the lock is either implicit at end of transaction or triggered thru DEQUEUE FM or COMMIT/ROLLBACK WORK (depends also on your choice on _SCOPE Parameter value).
    Regards,
    Raymond

Maybe you are looking for

  • Show ALL open windows in dock?

    I'm a recent convert from Windows to Mac and one of the things that's completely driving me nutts is that I work with many windows open all day long, constantly switching back and forth and in Windows this was simple, EVERY window I had running had a

  • How do I remove right 'reminders' column in iCal 5.0

    How do I remove rightside 'reminders' column in iCal 5.0

  • Problem using template in database configuration assistant Oracle 10g

    Hi, I created a database using the database configuration assistant for Oracle 10g on a Windows Server 2003 box. The database I created worked perfectly, and I had saved it as a template so I could save some time when creating similar databases (whic

  • Tax Code and Condtion Record

    HI, I know the tax procedure of TAXINN, but i have small doubt about Tax Code and Conditon Record. If we maintain the Tax Percentage i n the Tax Code and Condtion Record also.  What is the use maintain the Tax Percentage in two menctioned placess.  

  • How to get the ard file of crystal reports

    Hi all, I have downloaded crystal reports from sap market place but i dont have .ard file for that how to transfer that reports into sap. How to get the ard file please help me out. Thanks & Regards, Murtuza Ahmed.