Hyper-V Guest - RDP Connections cause high latency.

Hi all,
In a test environment we have a HP ProLiant DL360p Gen8 server with Windows Server 2012 R2 - Standard installed with the Hyper-V Role and no others.
On the server there is a Switch Independent network team configured with 2 of the 1GB NICs.
There is a virtual Swtich (External) configured on the Host linked to the Team with allow management selected.
The Guest VM has a single NIC (not a legacy setup) connected to the virtual Switch
The issue we are having is that once an RDP session is connected to a Guest OS, for example another 2012 R2 Server, it experiences high latency (which makes the RDP session appear to run in a very jerky way)
Using Hyper-V VMConnect, the server has no issues at all although the window is smaller.
We can verify this is being caused by an RDP session by observing ping times:
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=127 <RDP SESSION STARTS>
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=52ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=63ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=121ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=135ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=141ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=146ms TTL=127
......... Snipped ........
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=119ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=2ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=8ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=14ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=22ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=72ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time=75ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127 <RDP SESSION CLOSES
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
Reply from 10.101.3.152: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=127
This issue does not affect RDP sessions to the Host.
I have seen posts about disabling VMQ on the host/guest servers as there may be an issue with this model - this has had no effect at all, the issue persists after changing VMQ and restarting both the guest and the host OS.
I have seen another fix for a similar issue by running these commands: bcdedit.exe /set USEPLATFORMCLOCK on and this also has not resolved the issue.
I have also set the Guest VM to use 256Mbps minimum (512maximum - also tried with no maximum) bandwidth allocated, but again this does not resolve the issue.
There are no backup jobs or reporting jobs running on these servers (they are in test).
Is this caused by the specific hardware we have chosen or is there further diagnostics that can be performed? Any help would be appreciated.

Hi DalamarUK83,
"I have seen posts about disabling VMQ on the host/guest servers as there may be an issue with this model - this has had no effect at all, the issue persists after changing VMQ and restarting both the guest and the host OS."
Did you disable the feature in advanced settings of physical NICs ?
I would suggest to re-create virtual switch after disabling VMQ .
What is the make of that NIC ?
Best Regards
Elton Ji
We
are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

Similar Messages

  • Windows 7 Hyper V Guest Network Connectivity

    Hello (I posted this question over in the Microsoft VM Converter forum, not sure if that's the right place)
    I am using Hyper-V Manager in Server 2012 R2 and have created guest vm's that are Windows 8 and Windows 10.  All work fine and can connect to the network and have internet access (this is a dev environment).  However, when I create a Windows
    7 guest, it does not pickup an IP from DHCP and I cannot get it to connect at all.  Ive tried the following:
    1.  Installed Integration Services setup.
    2.  Used both legacy and non legacy network adapters.
    3.  Uninstalled/reinstalled HyperV network adapter in guest OS
    4.  Disabled IPv6 in guest OS.
    5.  Set static IP address in guest OS and reserved in DNS.
    6.  Manually assigned DNS server in guest OS.
    I then tried to create a guest Win7 OS on my Windows 8.1 host and experience the same issue, no connectivity.  In both instances I get a 169.254.x.x. address.  Is this some issue with Win7 and the latest Hyper-V version?  As I mentioned Windows
    8, 8.1, and 10 work just fine. 
    Thanks.

    Hi Marshal21,
    >>However, when I create a Windows 7 guest, it does not pickup an IP from DHCP and I cannot get it to connect at all.
    In vm settings please ensure that the Windows7 VM connects to the correct external virtual switch .
    If there is VLAN setting you also need to check VLan in VM settings .
    Also you may try to download a new Win7 ISO and test again.
    Best Regards
    Elton Ji
    If it is not the answer , please unmark it
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • Enabling time capsule wireless causes high latency.

    We are currently running a basic setup of a cable modem connected to the time capsule. There are 3 computers connected to the time capsule via a wired connection. We have two iphones, a laptop and an apple tv device connected to the time capsule via wireless.
    When the wireless is enabled on the time capsule, we experience a minimum of 600 ms ping on any device, running any application, regardless if the device is connected via wired or wireless. When I disable wireless completely via airport, the time capsule restarts. All 3 wired computers after this point are running at about 40-50ms ping.
    I first thought maybe one of the wireless devices is downloading an update and causing latency so I left the wireless on for the night. About 12 hours later, no change, still a minimum of 600ms ping.
    I changed the wireless password and reset the device. With no wireless clients, the issue still occurs.
    I also updated to the most recent firmware (7.6.4)
    I might also add that the time capsule is only 14 months old.

    Do any of the clients that run from ethernet also have wireless enabled? Can you go around and make sure they are all set to ethernet only .. wireless off.
    Test again with just one wired computer.. everything else off.
    Do a full factory reset of the TC.. to clear out all the settings and start over.
    Use all short names.. say 5-20 characters.. for TC .. for wireless which you will name differently for each band and for the hard disk share name.. ie do not use Apple names, long.. spaces and apostrophe.
    Do the ping test again. Ensuring the client has no wireless turned on. If the ping is still bad turn off wireless in the TC to verify it..
    Then I suggest you downgrade the TC to 7.6.1 firmware.. you cannot go back further than that.. do another factory reset.. no improvement then good chance the hardware is faulty..
    If you have applecare on any product apple should still fix / replace the TC.. sometimes they are generous if a product is just a couple of months over warranty. Ring and ask or take it to apple store for testing.

  • Invalid session cookie on High latency wan connections

    Hello,
    I've had users at a remote site complaining that they are getting disconnected regularly from the SGD server here and are then unable to reconnect for several minutes. The connection is a GRE tunnel over the between sites with several firewalls and proxies in between. As well, the clients are behind a NAT. This is a standalone server SGD 4.41. As a test, I set up an SGD server at the remote location and logged into it. I've been disconnected twice at random intervals with a popup dialog that says "Invalid connection Cookie" Please contact your Administrator. In the webtop browser window I attempted a refresh which resulted in a Session Expired message in the webtop message window. I login again and I see my application session still there but upon attempting to connect to it I receive the following:
    Web Service Request Failed
    The following fault was returned from the server
    Code Client.InvalidSessionCookie
    String <cookie info etc...> for admin:runCommand
    In a subsequent incident I received a popup with the message: The session already has a Secure Global Desktop Client Connection
    Once this popped up my webtop session was hung and I could not log back in to the SGD server until I closed my browser and restarted it.
    The connection has high latency 365+ ms and is notoriously unstable. Again there are multiple firewalls and proxies between the sites that I have no access to.
    Error logs show the following:
    Any ideas?
    bash-3.00# less jserver988_error.log
    2009/06/15 20:01:50.932 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076310932
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Invalid session cookie supplied for session 1245075516671:servername:2172620047794735723:Li4uL191c2VyL2VwZWVsZXI=.
    The operation will fail.
    Repeat the request with a valid session cookie.
    2009/06/15 20:07:25.691 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076645691
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Unable to write message of type webserver for servername:1245068645735:-3969341831847819217.
    Request will fail.
    The user should close the Secure Global Desktop Client process, end the
    session and start a new session.
    2009/06/15 20:07:28.867 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076648867
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Invalid session cookie supplied for session 1245075516671:servername:2172620047794735723:Li4uL191c2VyL2VwZWVsZXI=.
    The operation will fail.
    Repeat the request with a valid session cookie.
    2009/06/15 20:08:32.384 (pid 988) server/soapcommands/error #1245076712384
    Sun Secure Global Desktop Software (4.4) ERROR:
    Invalid session cookie supplied for session 6543220712367266453:servername:1245068645735:-3969341831847819217:1.
    The operation will fail.
    Repeat the request with a valid session cookie.

    Hi DalamarUK83,
    "I have seen posts about disabling VMQ on the host/guest servers as there may be an issue with this model - this has had no effect at all, the issue persists after changing VMQ and restarting both the guest and the host OS."
    Did you disable the feature in advanced settings of physical NICs ?
    I would suggest to re-create virtual switch after disabling VMQ .
    What is the make of that NIC ?
    Best Regards
    Elton Ji
    We
    are trying to better understand customer views on social support experience, so your participation in this
    interview project would be greatly appreciated if you have time.
    Thanks for helping make community forums a great place.

  • 2008 r2 hyper-v guest with static IP always looses network connectivity after every restart - no problem with DHCP

    Hello,
    We are running 2008 R2 domain with one physical DC and other running in VM on Hyper-V host (2008 R2 Standard). The host has 4 NICs and is configured to use one physical NIC for itself (management) and the hyper-v guest is configured to use another dedicated/physical
    NIC (through microsoft virtual switch) just for itself.
    I noticed that after setting the hyper-v guest with a static IP address all works fine only until guest restart. When the guest boots up the IP address is still configured correctly in IPv4 properties, but there is no network connectivity at all and in fact
    the guest shows running APIPA config in ipconfig /all output. That situation continues until I remove the virtual NIC from hyper-v guest, remove the virtual switch from dedicated NIC on host and then reconfigure it (using same settings as they were). very
    annoying.
    For time being I switched the virtual DC (problematic hyper-v guest) to a DHCP IP and configured DHCP server (running on physical DC machine, not on hyper-v host) to store a reservation for the hyper-v guest so it always gets the same "static"
    IP configuration.
    Is there some kind of a problem/bug with using static IP on (2008 R2) hyper-v guests? is there a hotfix for static IP config in hyper-v guest environment?
    both 2008 R2 OSes (host and guest) are up to date with all updates (synced with Microsoft, not WSUS).

    OK, I'm not at the office now, but took my time to test out the restart scenarios on problematic virtual guest remotely.
    No dice, same as it was, everything works fine after guest has IP configured in DHCP mode (IP reservation of 192.168.1.5 for specific MAC address) and it doesn't work after restart in static IP mode (same address, works before restart of guest).
    I also took "arp -a" outputs at each step from host server and that was always saying there is only a single host (192.168.1.5 = VDC = problematic virtual guest) assigned to that IP address and always with same MAC, so that pretty much rules out
    ARP/MAC troubles and no issues with switches/routers getting spoofed. Problem is most likely with the virtual guest (WS2008R2) or within the host running same OS.
    Here are outputs:
    A) VDC has IP configured in DHCP mode - always same, survives through restart (all works)
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . : CD.lan
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Virtual Machine Bus Network Adapter
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-15-5D-01-D3-00
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::b9af:6679:3142:8799%13(Preferred)
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.5(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
    Lease Obtained. . . . . . . . . . : Thursday, January 30, 2014 5:34:48 PM
    Lease Expires . . . . . . . . . . : Friday, February 07, 2014 5:35:26 PM
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
    DHCP Server . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.4.5
    DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 268440925
    DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1A-6F-5F-C2-00-15-5D-01-D3-00
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.5
    192.168.4.5
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    ARP -a output from host server at that time:
    Interface: 192.168.1.4 --- 0xc
    Internet Address Physical Address Type
    192.168.1.5 00-15-5d-01-d3-00 dynamic
    B) VDC has IP configured in static mode - BEFORE RESTART (all works)
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Virtual Machine Bus Network Adapter
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-15-5D-01-D3-00
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::b9af:6679:3142:8799%13(Preferred)
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.5(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
    DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 268440925
    DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1A-6F-5F-C2-00-15-5D-01-D3-00
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.5
    192.168.4.5
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    ARP -a output from host server at that time:
    Interface: 192.168.1.4 --- 0xc
    Internet Address Physical Address Type
    192.168.1.5 00-15-5d-01-d3-00 dynamic
    C) VDC has the same IP configured in static mode - AFTER RESTART (no more network connectivity at all, LAN in Public zone)
    Windows IP Configuration
    Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : VDC
    Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : CD.lan
    Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
    IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : CD.lan
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : Microsoft Virtual Machine Bus Network Adapter
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 00-15-5D-01-D3-00
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::b9af:6679:3142:8799%13(Preferred)
    Autoconfiguration IPv4 Address. . : 169.254.135.153(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.0.0
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
    DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 268440925
    DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1A-6F-5F-C2-00-15-5D-01-D3-00
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.5
    192.168.4.5
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    ARP -a output from host server at that time:
    Interface: 192.168.1.4 --- 0xc
    Internet Address Physical Address Type
    192.168.1.5 00-15-5d-01-d3-00 dynamic
    Throughout the testing, the hyper-v host IP configuration and IPconfig output was always staying same.
    The Network Connection #2 is the only one the host uses (not shared with hyper-v guests).
    The Network Connection #4 is assigned to Microsoft Virtual Switch hence why it doesn't show up in results, like below:
    Windows IP Configuration
    Host Name . . . . . . . . . . . . : HYPER-V
    Primary Dns Suffix . . . . . . . : CD.lan
    Node Type . . . . . . . . . . . . : Hybrid
    IP Routing Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    WINS Proxy Enabled. . . . . . . . : No
    DNS Suffix Search List. . . . . . : CD.lan
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 3:
    Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP Ethernet 1Gb 4-port 331i Adapter #3
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 9C-8E-99-52-15-91
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection 2:
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP Ethernet 1Gb 4-port 331i Adapter #2
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 9C-8E-99-52-15-90
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : No
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    Link-local IPv6 Address . . . . . : fe80::dc78:8a3b:38a5:7af3%12(Preferred)
    IPv4 Address. . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.4(Preferred)
    Subnet Mask . . . . . . . . . . . : 255.255.255.0
    Default Gateway . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.1.254
    DHCPv6 IAID . . . . . . . . . . . : 312250009
    DHCPv6 Client DUID. . . . . . . . : 00-01-00-01-1A-67-52-8F-9C-8E-99-52-15-93
    DNS Servers . . . . . . . . . . . : 192.168.4.5
    192.168.1.5
    NetBIOS over Tcpip. . . . . . . . : Enabled
    Ethernet adapter Local Area Connection:
    Media State . . . . . . . . . . . : Media disconnected
    Connection-specific DNS Suffix . :
    Description . . . . . . . . . . . : HP Ethernet 1Gb 4-port 331i Adapter
    Physical Address. . . . . . . . . : 9C-8E-99-52-15-93
    DHCP Enabled. . . . . . . . . . . : Yes
    Autoconfiguration Enabled . . . . : Yes
    On Monday I will install more test guests in Hyper-V host (WS2008R2), in variety of flavors like 7x64, 8.1x64, ws2012r2, and see if they show similar problems with static IP configuration when utilizing a dedicated NIC from host server.
    Don't get me wrong, I can live with virtual DC running on DHCP IP reservation (which is based on MAC), because the virtual DC pretty much requires a physical PDC (hosting also DHCP in my network) to be present for safety reasons ... however I prefer a static
    IP configuration on all servers, hence my question and surprise why it doesn't work.

  • High latency issue When connected through Wifi

    Hi
    I have configured wlc 2504 with cisco 3600 ap .when i connected my laptop wlan on n range,i tried to ping with my network devices am getting high latency 130ms,150ms
    Can anybody provide solution for this
    by
    Veeramani.G

    Hi Veeramani,
    There are actually a lot of different factors that can go into high latency type problems on your wireless deployment such as co-channel interference, interference from other wireless devices, and overall utilization on the AP/Channel.  With that said, there are a number of questions that need to be answered:
    1. Is this issue isolated to either the 802.11b/g 2.4Ghz, the 802.11a 5Ghz, or both bands?
    2.  While associated to the Access Point, in the Controller Web interface, navigate to Monitor > Access Points > 802.11a/n or 802.11b/g/n(pick the band your client is associated on) > Find the Access Point and scroll to the far right.  Hover over the small blue box and select 'Detail'.  Find the section labeled 'Load Statistics' and let me know what you see as the Channel Utilization percentage as well as the 'Attached Client Count'
    3. Since you have a 3600, I am assuming you have CleanAir enabled on them.  Navigate to Monitor > Cisco CleanAir, and see if you can pinpoint any noticeable interfering devices with high % Duty Cycle

  • AD "Log on to" restriction causes RDP connections with network level authentication to fail

    I am running a Server 2008 R2 environment and have recently enabled network level authentication for RDP connections. Since the change, users who have their logons restricted to specific servers via AD, now get an error when logging on via RDP:
    An Authentication error has occured
    The Local security authority cannot be contacted
    After investigating this error and reading technet I found that removing the "log on to" restriction within their user object solved the problem even tho they had rights to this server. Adding the users client PC name to the "Log on
    to" list also solves this issue.
    My question is, is there another way around this? We have an environment where some users may require an RDP connection from a client PC not on the same domain (over VPN) as the server. It will not be practical to add many different client PC names
    to the log on to list and I don't understand why client PC's must be specified in the Log on to list and not just the actual server they are logging onto.
    Any pointers appreciated

    I have just come across this problem on one of my client’s domains; they have recently enforced a policy to “Allow connections only from computers running Remote Desktop with Network Level Authentication (more secure)”  and users with “Log on To” restrictions
    on their account are no longer able to RDP using their second account.
    After a lot of fiddling around I finally resolved the problem by adding the connecting computer name into “Log on To” list.  Ultimately it appears that Network Level Authentication (NLA) requires authentication to take place on both the host initiating
    the connection and the remote host.

  • High latency causing problems... and frustration w...

    I have a femtocell that requires the latency on any single hop on the internet to be less than 240ms, any longer than this and it drops my phone call. On contacting the supplier of the femtocell, they asked me to use Traceroute to see how long the path to a server was (I used Google.com) and many of the hops were over 240ms, some as long as 4922ms.
    On scanning this forum, there are other users out there (mostly gamers) who are suffering from latency problems. Has anyone had any success resolving the problem? I can send copies of the Traceroute outputs that clearly show high latency between routers with addresses such as interconnect2-gig1-0.manchester.fixed.bt.net, core2-pos0-6-1-0.ealing.ukcore.bt.net and core4te-0-7-0-0.telehouse.ukcore.bt.net, to anyone that may be able to help.
    The best I've so far had from BT is that:
    - It's a problem with the femtocell supplier: no, the supplier requested from ISPs their longest expected latency prior to releasing the femtocell and set the timeout to be equal to this
    - It's a problem with my Mac mail: the fact that I use a Mac has absolutely nothing to do with network latency
    - There's interference between my mobile phone and my wireless: this isn't the case (I'm a wireless communications engineer by background) and, if it was, almost no-one would be able to use mobile phones given the number of wireless access points in homes and offices.
    Every time I get a call from the call centre it's someone different, who doesn't understand the problem, doesn't know what a femtocell is and hasn't read the notes which clearly state that I want to be called on my mobile, not on my home phone. It's looking like my best option may be to try to find another ISP who doesn't have this problem.

    I think you have the result of what is maybe a 2 fold issue.
    Femtocell technology is still a relatively new technology as you;ll  know from your job.
    If you think about the security issues of running a femtocell, that;s to say what it actually has to fulfil,
    Security for femtocell networks spans several distinct requirements. The service provider must authenticate users as they arrive on the network. The RF link between the handset and the femtocell must be secured for both user and control plane traffic. And lastly, the mobile network traffic must be placed into a virtual private network as it traverses the wired ISP network to ensure that the traffic is protected while transiting this public network and only authorized users can forward traffic to the mobile operator's network.
    There is however one very important element of femtocell security which makes the implementation significantly more complex. This relates to latency as you say, which must be carefully managed especially for applications such as VoIP/SIP. Compounding this challenge is the unknown nature of the latency across the ISP network, which has resulted in service providers requiring latency in the femtocell to be minimized, as you say.
    If you add to that the fact that the BT broadband system is based on an algorithm packet handled system to ensure data quality across maybe noisy telephone lines, it all compounds to add to the problems of the running of the femtocell.
    In other words if you have a highly error corrected and interleaved broadband line, it's not going to help the femtocell out by adding additional latency to what is already a fairly complicated situation where data handling is concerned....

  • Why does my 10GB iSCSI setup seem see such high latency and how can I fix it?

    I have a iscsi server setup with the following configuration
    Dell R510
    Perc H700 Raid controller
    Windows Server 2012 R2
    Intel Ethernet X520 10Gb
    12 near line SAS drives
    I have tried both Starwind and the built in Server 2012 iscsi software but see similar results.  I am currently running the latest version of starwinds free
    iscsi server.
    I have connected it to a HP 8212 10Gb port which is also connected via 10Gb to our vmware servers.  I have a dedicated vlan just for iscsi and have enabled
    jumbo frames on the vlan.
    I frequently see very high latency on my iscsi storage.  So much so that it can timeout or hang vmware.  I am not sure why.  I can run IOmeter and
    get some pretty decent results.
    I am trying to determine why I see such high latency 100'ms.  It doesn't seem to always happen, but several times throughout the day, vmware is complaining
    about the latency of the datastore.  I have a 10Gb iscsi connection between the servers.  I wouldn't expect the disks to be able to max that out.  The highest I could see when running IO meter was around 5Gb.  I also don't see much load
    at all on the iscsi server when I see the high latency.  It seems network related, but I am not sure what settings I could check.  The 10Gb connect should be plenty as I said and it is no where near maxing that out.
    Any thoughts about any configuration changes I could make to my vmware enviroment, network card settings or any ideas on where I can troubleshoot this.  I
    am not able to find what is causing it.  I reference this document and for changes to my iscsi settings 
    http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/extras/m/white_papers/20403565.aspx
    Thank you for your time.

    I have a iscsi server setup with the following configuration
    Dell R510
    Perc H700 Raid controller
    Windows Server 2012 R2
    Intel Ethernet X520 10Gb
    12 near line SAS drives
    I have tried both Starwind and the built in Server 2012 iscsi software but see similar results.  I am currently running the latest version of starwinds free
    iscsi server.
    I have connected it to a HP 8212 10Gb port which is also connected via 10Gb to our vmware servers.  I have a dedicated vlan just for iscsi and have enabled
    jumbo frames on the vlan.
    I frequently see very high latency on my iscsi storage.  So much so that it can timeout or hang vmware.  I am not sure why.  I can run IOmeter and
    get some pretty decent results.
    I am trying to determine why I see such high latency 100'ms.  It doesn't seem to always happen, but several times throughout the day, vmware is complaining
    about the latency of the datastore.  I have a 10Gb iscsi connection between the servers.  I wouldn't expect the disks to be able to max that out.  The highest I could see when running IO meter was around 5Gb.  I also don't see much load
    at all on the iscsi server when I see the high latency.  It seems network related, but I am not sure what settings I could check.  The 10Gb connect should be plenty as I said and it is no where near maxing that out.
    Any thoughts about any configuration changes I could make to my vmware enviroment, network card settings or any ideas on where I can troubleshoot this.  I
    am not able to find what is causing it.  I reference this document and for changes to my iscsi settings 
    http://en.community.dell.com/techcenter/extras/m/white_papers/20403565.aspx
    Thank you for your time.
    If both StarWind and MSFT target show the same numbers I can guess it's network configuration issue. Anything higher then 30 ms is a nightmare :( Did you properly tune your network stacks? What numbers (x-put and latency) you get for raw TCP numbers (NTtcp
    and Iperf are handy to show)?
    StarWind VSAN [Virtual SAN] clusters Hyper-V without SAS, Fibre Channel, SMB 3.0 or iSCSI, uses Ethernet to mirror internally mounted SATA disks between hosts.

  • VSS timeouts on Hyper-V guest, Exchange Replication Service, CU5

    I'm having a problem with a Hyper-V guest that is running Exchange 2013 CU5.  I will say I have had issues with this VM since installing CU5.
    Note:  I am doing a backup from within the VM guest, not from the host.
    The scheduled backup takes a long time to complete, an entire weekend to backup 150GB to an ISCSI disk.  In addition the CPU time is very high (58%) while this is happening.  Attempting to open the backup manager window consistently makes the CPU
    time hit 99%.  When this happens Outlook clients will fail.  When backup manager opens it will continually say "Reading data; please wait..."  If the backup manager happened to already been open, the backup job will say "Volume
    1 0% of 4 volumes."
    The processes taking up the CPU time are Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy Service  (24%), Microsoft Block level backup service (62%) and virtual disk service (12%).  Memory use always hovers around 65%.  If I attempt to kill the processes with
    task manager, there is no change.  If I use the kill executable it will say the process is not running.  I cannot stop the corresponding service either.  I cannot stop the backup.  I cannot query vss writer status.  I cannot restart
    the ISCSI service (device in use.)  Restarting the NAS that contains the ISCSI target does nothing.  The only recourse is to restart the server.
    If I restart the server and start a backup fairly soon after, the backup completes normally, in about an hour.  During a normal backup CPU usage is at about 30%.  The Microsoft Volume Shadow Copy Service runs at 0% CPU time as well as the virtual
    disk service.  The Microsoft Block Level Backup Engine runs at 10% CPU time.  The scheduled backup is set to start at 9:30pm.  I have also tried changing backup times.  If I restart the server at 4 am and do not run a manual backup, the
    scheduled backup performs poorly.
    After some digging I find these errors:
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeRepl
    Date:          10/14/2014 9:30:41 PM
    Event ID:      2112
    Task Category: Exchange VSS Writer
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Description:
    The Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer instance 7a465f3f-25ba-45b2-952a-870a6ddc2f2b failed with error code 80070020 when preparing for a backup of database 'Mailbox Database 2123847568'.
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        VSS
    Date:          10/14/2014 9:30:41 PM
    Event ID:      8229
    Task Category: None
    Level:         Warning
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Description:
    A VSS writer has rejected an event with error 0x00000000, The operation completed successfully.
    . Changes that the writer made to the writer components while handling the event will not be available to the requester. Check the event log for related events from the application hosting the VSS writer. 
    Operation:
       PrepareForBackup event
    Context:
       Execution Context: Writer
       Writer Class Id: {7e47b561-971a-46e6-96b9-696eeaa53b2a}
       Writer Name: MSMQ Writer (MSMQ)
       Writer Instance Name: MSMQ Writer (MSMQ)
       Writer Instance ID: {b8ae6140-7fcb-427d-9493-e070221f752f}
       Command Line: C:\Windows\system32\mqsvc.exe
       Process ID: 1676
    Log Name:      Application
    Source:        MSExchangeRepl
    Date:          10/14/2014 9:30:41 PM
    Event ID:      2024
    Task Category: Exchange VSS Writer
    Level:         Error
    Keywords:      Classic
    User:          N/A
    Description:
    The Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer (Instance 7a465f3f-25ba-45b2-952a-870a6ddc2f2b) failed with error 80070020 when preparing for a backup.
    As you can see the errors happen almost immediately after the backup starts.
    In addition the following VSSwriters show a last error "timed out"
    Microsoft Exchange Writer
    Com+ RegDB Writer
    Shadow Copy Optimization Writer
    Registry Writer
    I will add also the following issues I have been experiencing ever since installing CU5:
    1 Version buckets threshold easy reached.  Had to modify threshold and set limits on email size. Sometimes still happens.
    2 After a restart of the server, the server may have no, or limited connection to the network.  It may or may not have an exclamation point on the network icon.  If there is no exclamation point, it can ping other network resources, but inbound requests
    and pings, will fail.  The event log shows that the network should be available while booting, but it's not since it cannot communicate with active directory.  The fix for this is to disable/enable the network adapter and then all is well.
    I really need some help figuring this out.  Again, never had an issue with this server prior to Exchange 2013 CU5 being installed.

    Hi,
    The reason I think it is Exchange related, is that from the error message it mentioned:
    A VSS writer has rejected an event with error 0x00000000
    And then it indicated it is "Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer". 
    The Microsoft Exchange Replication service VSS Writer (Instance 7a465f3f-25ba-45b2-952a-870a6ddc2f2b) failed with error 80070020 when preparing for a backup
    Later I found this article:
    How to turn on the Exchange writer for the Volume Shadow Copy service in Windows Small Business Server 2003
    http://support2.microsoft.com/kb/838183/en-us
    It mentioned that with turned on Exchange writer, we will fail to do system state backup and Exchange backup at a same time:
    The Exchange writer may cause conflicts with the information store backup feature of the Backup utility. The information store backup feature uses online streaming to back up the Exchange databases. If the Exchange writer is registered, the Backup utility
    may log errors if you try to back up the system state and the Exchange information store at the same time. (For example, the Backup utility may log Event ID 8019.)
    In order to confirm if it is the cause, please test to:
    1. Create a backup-once task to backup only a simple file - this is a quick test to confirm if Windows Server Backup is fine or not.
    2. A second backup-once task to do a system state backup without any exchange related information.
    3. If both failed, please test to disable Exchange Writer and redo test 1&2.
    It will take us some time on doing these tests. The reason is to figure out if it is Exchange related or not. I'll continue discuss with you if any new clue is found. 
    If you have any feedback on our support, please send to [email protected]

  • Safari loading pages slowly / high latency

    I have recently been asked by one of my clients to look at a problem with their 3 macs at their place of business. They are an iMac, a macbook and a macbook air. They have all started to exhibit the same problem of being slow to load web pages using safari as their web browser of choice.
    Using the broadband speed test at speedtest.net shows that they are getting some extremely high latency (~4000ms) to some sites.
    I have tested the broadband connection thoroughly using my own (linux) laptop and everything seems to be in working order. Tests on the macs themselves using a terminal show that latency to the internet and dns response times are all as they should be.
    From some limited searching the problem appears to be similar to the problem described in http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=8799710&#8799710 where safari itself is causing some problems for some reason.
    What I'm looking for is some suggestions on how i can go about fixing the problem when i next visit the client

    Welcome to the forums!
    The following usually works on both Tiger and Leopard:
    (First, if yours is an Intel Mac, check that Safari is not running in Rosetta, which is enough to slow it to a crawl.)
    Adding DNS codes to your Network Settings, should gives good results in terms of speed-up:
    Open System Preferences/Network. Double click on your connection type, or select it in the drop-down menu. Click on TCP/IP and in the box marked 'DNS Servers' enter the following two numbers:
    208.67.222.222
    208.67.220.220
    (An explanation of why that is both safe and a good idea can be read here: http://www.labnol.org/internet/tools/opendsn-what-is-opendns-why-required-2/2587 / )
    Whilst in System Preferences/Network you should also turn off 'IPv6' in your preference pane, as otherwise you may not get the full speed benefit (the DNS resolver will default to making SRV queries). If you want to know what IPv6 is:
    This is Apple's guidance on iPv6:
    http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?path=Mac/10.5/en/8708.html
    Click on Apply Now and close the window.
    Restart Safari, and repair permissions.
    If that didn't do it, then try this as well:
    Empty Safari's cache (from the Safari menu), then close Safari.
    Go to Home/Library/Safari and delete the following files:
    form values
    download.plist
    Then go to Home/Library/Preferences and delete
    com.apple.Safari.plist
    Repair permissions (in Disk Utility).
    Start up Safari again, and things should have improved.

  • Extremely slow and high latency all day.

    DSL is running extremely slow during peak hours from 12 afternoon to 12 midnight.   Lower than 50% of rated speed and high latency
    I have been frustrated with this DSL Service for months now.  I am considering contacting BBB to file a complaint and I am tired of dealing with customer service giving me the run around.  Internet is a monopoly in my area therefore verizon feels it doesn't have to do anything to keep its customers when they provide crappy service.  I am on waitlist for another internet service provider and it is going to take almost a year because of how bad the internet options are in the area and demand for better options.    I even had to pay over 100 dollars to get a truck roll come to my house to fix any issues within the house and the internet has not gotten better.  Atleast I feel I should get a refund or something.  
    Here is my speedtest result just now.  http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/2899553407
    It has been even slower at other times. http://www.speedtest.net/my-result/2893509440
    Modem is Westell 6100 or something. 
    Transceiver Statistics
    Transceiver Revision:
    7.2.3.0
    Vendor ID Code:
    4
    Line Mode:
    G.DMT Mode
    Data Path:
    Interleaved
    Transceiver Information
    Downstream Path
    Upstream Path
    DSL Speed (Kbits/Sec)
    3360
    864
    Margin (dB)
    15.5
    13.0
    Line Attenuation (dB)
    21.5
    13.0
    Transmit Power (dBm)
    7.6
    11.9
    Giganews line info
    news.giganews.com
    traceroute to {edited for privacy}, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 gw1-g-vlan201.dca.giganews.com (216.196.98.4) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    2 ash-bb1-link.telia.net (213.248.70.241) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    3 TenGigE0-2-0-0.GW1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.125.125.41) 3 ms GigabitEthernet2-0-0.GW8.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.65.76.189) 3 ms TenGigE0-2-0-0.GW1.IAD8.ALTER.NET (63.125.125.41) 3 ms
    4 P1-8-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.151.237) 72 ms 72 ms 72 ms
    5 P9-3.LSANCA-LCR-01.verizon-gni.net (130.81.193.123) 75 ms P8-0.LSANCA-DSL-44.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.133) 75 ms 76 ms
    6 * * *
    7 * * *
    8 * * *
    9 * * *
    10 * * *
    11 * * *
    12 * * *
    13 * * *
    14 * * *
    15 * * *
    16 * * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
    news-europe.giganews.com
    traceroute to {edited for privacy}, 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
    1 vl201.gw1.ams.giganews.com (216.196.110.3) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    2 te7-8.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.17) 0 ms te7-7.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.9) 0 ms te7-8.ccr01.ams05.atlas.cogentco.com (149.11.104.17) 0 ms
    3 te0-7-0-16.ccr21.ams03.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.72.42) 0 ms 0 ms 0 ms
    4 te0-3-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (130.117.48.141) 8 ms 8 ms te0-2-0-0.ccr21.lon13.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.28.158) 8 ms
    5 te0-7-0-4.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.84.125) 90 ms te0-0-0-4.ccr21.jfk02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.84.129) 90 ms *
    6 te0-3-0-6.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.41.5) 96 ms te0-0-0-2.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.25.238) 96 ms te0-2-0-7.ccr21.dca01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.41.1) 96 ms
    7 be2042.ccr21.iad02.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.26.126) 97 ms 97 ms 97 ms
    8 uunet.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.13.138) 99 ms verizon.iad01.atlas.cogentco.com (154.54.10.226) 105 ms 105 ms
    9 P0-8-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-22.verizon-gni.net (130.81.29.127) 177 ms 178 ms P1-0-0-0.LSANCA-LCR-21.verizon-gni.net (130.81.199.39) 174 ms
    10 P8-0.LSANCA-DSL-44.verizon-gni.net (130.81.35.133) 175 ms P9-3.LSANCA-LCR-02.verizon-gni.net (130.81.193.109) 187 ms 182 ms
    11 * * *
    12 * * *
    13 * * *
    14 * * *
    15 * * *
    16 * * *
    17 * * *
    18 * * *
    19 * * *
    20 * * *
    21 * Max number of unresponsive hops reached (firewall or filter?)
    Here is what ICSI Netalyzer Results have stated.  
    Network Access Link Properties + –
    Network performance (?): Latency: 580 ms, Loss: 15.5% –
    The round-trip time (RTT) between your computer and our server is 580 ms, which is somewhat high. This may be due to a variety of factors, including distance between your computer and our server, a slow network link, or other network traffic.
    We recorded a packet loss of 16%. This loss is very significant and will lead to serious performance problems. It could be due either to very high load on our servers due to a large number of visitors, or problems in your network. Of the packet loss, at least 14.0% of the packets appear to have been lost on the path from your computer to our servers.
    TCP connection setup latency (?): 720ms –
    The time it takes for your computer to set up a TCP connection with our server is 720 ms, which is quite high. This may be due to a variety of factors, including a significant distance between your computer and our server, a particularly slow or poor network link, or problems in your network.
    Background measurement of network health (?): 3 transient outages, longest: 0.8 seconds –
    During most of Netalyzr's execution, the client continuously measures the state of the network in the background, looking for short outages. During testing, the client observed 3 such outages. The longest outage lasted for 0.8 seconds. This suggests a general problem with the network where connectivity is intermittent. This loss might also cause some of Netalyzr's other tests to produce incorrect results.
    Network bandwidth (?): Upload 700 Kbit/s, Download 2.3 Mbit/s +
    Network buffer measurements (?): Uplink 5400 ms, Downlink 1200 ms –
    We estimate your uplink as having 5400 ms of buffering. This is quite high, and you may experience substantial disruption to your network performance when performing interactive tasks such as web-surfing while simultaneously conducting large uploads. With such a buffer, real-time applications such as games or audio chat can work quite poorly when conducting large uploads at the same time.
    We estimate your downlink as having 1200 ms of buffering. This is quite high, and you may experience substantial disruption to your network performance when performing interactive tasks such as web-surfing while simultaneously conducting large downloads. With such a buffer, real-time applications such as games or audio chat can work quite poorly when conducting large downloads at the same time.
    HTTP Tests + –
    Address-based HTTP proxy detection (?): OK +
    Content-based HTTP proxy detection (?): OK +
    HTTP proxy detection via malformed requests (?): OK +
    Filetype-based filtering (?): OK +
    HTTP caching behavior (?): OK +
    JavaScript-based tests (?): OK +
    DNS Tests + –
    Restricted domain DNS lookup (?): OK +
    Unrestricted domain DNS lookup (?): OK +
    DNS resolver address (?): OK +
    DNS resolver properties (?): Lookup latency 520 ms +
    Direct probing of DNS resolvers (?): +
    DNS glue policy (?): OK +
    DNS resolver port randomization (?): OK +
    DNS lookups of popular domains (?): OK +
    DNS external proxy (?): OK +
    DNS results wildcarding (?): Warning –
    Your ISP's DNS server returns IP addresses even for domain names which should not resolve. Instead of an error, the DNS server returns an address of 199.101.28.20, which resolves to search.dnsassist.verizon.net. You can inspect the resulting HTML content here.
    There are several possible explanations for this behavior. The most likely cause is that the ISP is attempting to profit from customer's typos by presenting advertisements in response to bad requests, but it could also be due to an error or misconfiguration in the DNS server.
    The big problem with this behavior is that it can potentially break any network application which relies on DNS properly returning an error when a name does not exist.
    The following lists your DNS server's behavior in more detail.
    Please help.  I am so frustrated I literally have fights with my family over internet problems.  I am right now looking for other options and even starting to think about paying over 100 a month for dedicated line or T1 if they can service my area.  

    Not a single response from Verizon on this? And after you posted the tests & information they will need? I think I may have to make a service choice soon. Its bad enough Verizon can't post a simple email address for our support, they have removed Usenet access, removed access to our websites (I use HTML so their sitebuilder is useless)... Sheeshe...

  • Router cannot see Hyper-V Guest MAC address

    Greeting,
    I have been trying to build a server on Hyper-V, on a host running Windows Server 2012 R2, and a wireless adapter is used.
    A virtual switch was created as external, connected to the host's wireless adapter.
    The guest OS is Debian 7, and the problem is it's unable to use DHCP to connect to the internet.
    I have to manually specific an IP address and the subnet mask in order to access the internet in the Guest OS, say 192.168.0.50. And I set port forward to this IP for external connection to the guest, but then sometimes I cannot connect; without doing anything
    it restores the connection after a while. At the same time I am keeping the MSRDP connection to tthe host so the host has not lost connecting to the internet.
    When the server on Guest is not accessible from the web, I can still connect to the server within the host machine by typing the lan IP of the guest: 192.168.0.50
    On checking the router, I found that two IP address 192.168.0.50 (Guest OS) and 192.168.0.15 (Host) are sharing the same MAC address (of the wireless card). It means the MAC address of the Guest OS is not seen by the router, and I suppose this is the root
    for the instability.
    Would you have any ideas about the situation, and suggested solution?
    Thank you.

    An update to my issue:
    Just realized the possible cause: the (freaking) router is dropping inactive machine.
    Basically the DHCP issue is not solved, but it doesn't seem to be a cause after all, as long as I manually assign the IP it works, even having the  2 IPs with the same MAC on the ARP table on router. (Host connection drop has to be further investigated).
    As I found that the loss of connection actually happens after a while I don't touch the web server on VM, the longer I leave it idle the more likely I cannot connect to it again. The situation is like a prolonged loading when trying to access a website,
    where sometimes you can connect after a while, or you never.
    What's weird is, if I somehow manage to connect to the idle VM server by multiple attempts, and that after I have restored the connection, I can reconnect to the server from another computer very quickly without any significant loading time.
    On some quick searches, I found someone using Linksys router is suffering from a similar situation as I do:
    http://serverfault.com/questions/522448/application-request-routing-on-a-hyper-v-guest-intermittently-stops
    So what I can try are basically 3 ways 
    -Change the router, not viable as I don't own it.
    -Insert a wireless bridge in between
    -Do something with Debian, making it periodically generate network request to the internet to keep the connection alive
    Any ideas about my observation, and maybe possible solutions?
    Thank you for reading.

  • ISE 1.2.1 Complaining about High latency - can´t figure out why.

    Hello! 
    my 2 node (16 core, 32 GB Ram, SAN) ISE installation on VMWARE is, complaining about High latency. I have about 250 Test clients connected, and the VMWARE guys can´t seem to find anything wrong. Is there anyway to get a more detailed test WHAT actually is causing this high latency? CPU´s are idling, ram is at 2% and disk I/O is almost not messurable.. but the software is still complaining. (the Dashboard shows latency at 100+ ms) I think this might be the external CA, againt which the client certificates are run. but I don´t know if I can test this theorie! 
    I have 2 Hardware Appliances coming, but I thought my Test enviroment should be more then enough to handel 250 clients.. I am abit concerned about the going live with 5000 clients in the future.. if it is already complaining with 250 active clients. 
    and yes, I will be splitting the tasks up between the 2 Physical Boxes (Profiling and such) and the 2 VM Boxes (Management) but at the moment, for 250 clients the 2 VM´s should be enough. 

    I have a couple of my customers complaining about this as well. I believe it is cosmetic and it is due to this bug CSCup97285
    The suggested action for this alarm in ISE is:
    Check if the system has sufficient resources, Check the actual amount of work on the system for example, no of authentications, profiler activity etc.., Add additional server to distribute the load
    I have confirmed with both clients that the appropriate resources were allocated and reserved in VM. In addition, neither client is reporting any issues so this leads me to believe that it is just a cosmetic bug.
    Thank you for rating helpful posts!

  • High latency/pi​ng times

    Greetings
    I have had DSL for a while and have had no real issues until recently
    My problem is that I am receiving high latency/ping times while using VPN and while playing internet games (doing each exclusive of one another of course). I am continually being dropped or if I stay connected the LAG is so bad that it makes using the VPON or playing games impossibly frustrating. All of this started about 5 days ago or so, so I am wondering what the problem could be.
    My modem is new; I just got DSL in December. I have tried bypassing my router and still get the same result. I have also used computers running XP sp3, Vista Sp2 and Win 7 64 bit, all with the same result.
    Any ideas? Also can inclement weather in Northern VA be causing issues with the verizon's overall network performance? all of that snow cant be good thing for DSL.
    I am in SW VA and we have had alot of snow as well.
    Anyways, if anyone has any ideas, please let me know.. because VPN is how I work some days and this latency issue is causing me to re think my switch to DSL

    #1 What is the brand and model of your modem?
    #2 What is the brand and model of your router?
    If you are the original poster (OP) and your issue is solved, please remember to click the "Solution?" button so that others can more easily find it. If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the "Kudos" button.

Maybe you are looking for