Account Assignments for depreciation below zero

Folks,
In comparing the configuration between ECC6.0 and R4.6c, I noticed that in the ECC6.0 system configuration for Assign G/L accounts for depreciation (Asset Accounting> Integ with the GL> Assign G/L Accounts), I note that there is an additional g/l account assignment line item for each of the depreciation type i.e.:
1) Oridinary depreciation - "Expense account for ord. dep. below zero";
2) Special depreciation - "Expense account for ord. dep. below zero";
3) Unplanned depreciation - "P&L act unpl dep below 0".
These config line items were not available in R4.6c. Would appreciate if you could let me know where they were configured in R4.6c.
Thanks,
Teck

Expense account for ord. dep. below - additional line feature is also available in 4.7
Please find any support package for update this information in 4.6C

Similar Messages

The account setted for depreciation don't be updated to TABLE 'T095B'

Hi all,
    When i runed TCODE 'AFAB', it show the error message as below:
In area 01, acc. allocation is missing for account group 1050000
Message no. AA 719
Diagnosis
Inconsistent account assignment rules for depreciation posting have been determined.
System Response
You cannot post depreciation.
Procedure
Check and correct the account assignment.
After debug, i found the account setted for depreciation did't be updated to TABLE 'T095B'.
Who can give me some advice for this issue???
Thanks in advance.

Hi all,
    I find the answer finally. I created the asset of company when i implemented the AM modul. The issue is up. So it's ok after reset.
    Thanks for all.

Cash or bank account should not go below zero

hi friends,
what are configuration required to set bank and cash account should not go below zero. and system should give an error message for the same.

1.For Module Pool Programme
Validating Fields
Now we will write the code for validating each field of the screen 200.
Module check_name.
Perform validate_name.
endmodule.
Form validate_name.
If not ztryemp-name co c_alphabet.
Message e999(z1) with text-005.
Endif.
Endform.
Kindly check below Links for more datails2.Validation
2.http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/5b/d231e143c611d182b30000e829fbfe/content.htm
3. Validation in fields
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04s/helpdata/en/3c/50b512e4174becbaf2b1c856eb1290/content.htm

Issue during Depreciation Below Zero Calcualtion

Dear All,
I have configured for depreciation below calculation with a separate depreciation area. There is no depreciation calculated till the end of useful life.
It is workign fine, but issue is that if an asset's useful life is expiring in between a year, then the depreciation below zero is getting calculated from the next year only. E.g. If asset's useful life is expiring in Sep, then the deprecitaion from Oct to Dec is not being considered in the depreciation below zero calculation
Can anyone guide on what may be missing for this?
Many thanks
Regards,
Gaurav

without doing any configuration setup is it possible to rectify the error message. Please explain asset retirement with scrap had done on last year, asset depreciation running in current year, why the above error message is showing, please clarify.

Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition

Hi,
Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition:
The actual MM configuration is a single account assignment in the purchase requisition (although the option of multiple account assignments exist for trips). What are the implications at GR posting? Assuming that we could use the option for quantity and percentage distribution.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Multiple account assignment:
Specifying Multiple Account Assignment
This procedure allows you to apportion the costs associated with a PR/PO item (among several cost centers, for example).
With multiple account assignment, the account assignment data entered takes the form of individual account assignment items.
Prerequisites
When specifying multiple account assignment for an item, you must consider the following points:
1.How is the net value of a PO item to be distributed (apportioned) among the individual account assignment items?
The costs can be allocated on a quantity or percentage basis (for example, 10 pieces or 10% of the order value to cost center 100).
2.How are the costs to be apportioned if only a part of the ordered quantity has been delivered and invoiced?
The partial invoice amount can be distributed proportionally, i.e. evenly, among the account assignment items of a purchase order.
The partial invoice amount can be distributed on a "progressive fill-up" basis, i.e. the invoiced amount is allocated to the individual account assignment items one after the other. Only when account assignment item 1 has been charged in full is item 2 charged; only when account assignment item 2 has been charged is item 3 charged, and so on. This process continues until the total invoice value of the PO item is reached.
Procedure
1.When entering an item, specify the account assignment category for the desired item on the item overview screen.
2.Choose Item -> Account assignments.
The account assignment window appears.
3.Enter the account assignment data for the first account assignment item.
Choose Change display to call up the multiple account assignment screen.
4.In the item fields (upper part of this screen) enter the relevant data:
Select the GR non-val. field to designate the GR for this item as non-valuated (as the item has been ordered for direct consumption).
In the Distribution field, specify whether the costs are to be apportioned on a quantity basis or by percentage.
In the Partial invoice field, specify whether the value of a partial invoice is to be allocated to individual account assignment items successively, whereby one is debited in full before a posting is made to another one (in which case, some account assignment items may not be debited at all as a result of a particular invoice), or whether the value of such a partial invoice is to be distributed among all account assignment items in equal portions.
5.For each account assignment item, enter either the quantity or the percentage of the total value to be charged to the relevant account assignment item.
To enter further items with the same account assignment data, choose Edit -> Repeat account assignment -> Switch on. The account assignment data will then be automatically adopted in the next item.
6.Repeat as necessary for other items.
7.Save the purchase order.
A vendor submits an invoice for 60% of the total order value. The cost of the ordered goods is to be divided equally among cost centers 1 - 5 (that is, 20% of the total cost is to be borne by each).
If you specified for the PO item that the value of a partial invoice is to be debited to the individual account assignment items on a "progressive fill-up" basis, cost centers 1 to 3 will each be debited with their full 20% share of the total cost on the basis of this partial invoice, whereas cost centers 4 and 5 will not be charged at all. (The latter two cost centers will not be debited until the remaining amount is invoiced.)
Regards
Ramakrishna

Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items

Hi All,
I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
For line item 10 -
1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
How can i create the same...
Thanks in advance
Regards
Prasanthi

Dear Prithviraj,
CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
thanks
Regards,
Weng

Account Assignments for Dep and Accum

Hi,
The GL account assignment at COA level for Depreciation and accumilated depreciation.
The COD is assigned to Co codes. We have already one co code is in Production. The other one is in Legacy asset transfer stage.
1.Can I use a different GL accounts( Temporary Dep Account and Accum ) for second co code for Depreciation and accum dep when the system is having another co code which is in production with correct Dep and accum dep accounts?
2.Will the system allow to change when the production data is there as we have to use the same COD for a new co code.?
The scenario is when we go live for second co code we want to use a different GL accoutns for Dep and Accum for Legacy transfer ( End of previous year) We want to run Depreciation every month and compare with Legacy .Finally when we swicth over to SAP we want to use different GL account (like Production system)
Once the Numbers are tallied then we shall pass JV from temp Dep account to Regular dep account and regular accum Dep account
What is the best approach ?
Thanks,
Chitra

Hi Srinu,
Sorry for my delay i- I was away.
Yes You are correct. The approach is more complicated unnecessarily. Anyhow now switched to the standard approach as I could convince my user as follows.
The scenario is like this . we are taking the balance from legacy as of last FY . Say Apr-Mar   Take the balances as of March to legacy asset transfer at the end of previous FY.. ( For audit perspective and want to see w/o a gap in FA for the whole year)
We have to prove that the balances are taken from legacy are accurate and tallied with GL of Legacy on
1.Accum depreciation
2.Asset balances and depreciation
You are correct that agree that it is not correct approach to change the config when the same COD is being used by other co code in the same box.
Alternatively we designed like this. .
1.     As GL balances are taken from Legacy system we get the trial balance from them and use the conversion accounts for Asset balances and accum in the trial balance taken from Legacy syste,
2.     So the conversion account 900001 hold the data Say 10000 as asset bal and (conversion account 900002 )7000 as acccum
3.     We load the legacy data using AS91
4.     End of it the balance in FA is 10000 and 70000 which matches with Conversion account 90001 and 90002
5.     In GL they pass a JV to shift the GL balances from conversion account to real asset account and accum account as in FA
6.     The balances in Conversion account should be 0 at the end.
7.     If any difference then it has to be investigated and corrected.
8.     New assets are added as transaction as well retirement
9.     Run depreciation at the end of every period
10.     Check the Exp account Depreciation account .
11.     That should tally with the P&L balance taken over from legacy system   for GL side of SAP as historical data transfer for GL balances at P&L side ( use conversion account for Depreciation amount of Expenses side of the P&L taken for SAP at monthly interval. )
12.     If any difference in Depreciation amount then it has to be investigated and adjusted .
Please guide /Correct me if I missed out anything
Regards,
Chitra

Activation of Additional Account Assignments for Asset Accounting

Hi,
I am facing the problem while running depreciation run through AFAB in that the system giving the error message i.e the cost center I3010 is not relevant to business area 7211 but it is 7210.But when I check Cost center(I3010) Master Record it has been correctly assigned with as system saying with 7210 Business Area and not 7210.Eventhough I assgined correct business area in CCTR Master Record why this error is still coming.
And in the error help it is saying that you should make explicit assignment with 7210 business area and for this you have to make business area field as a readily input in cutomizing.After that I check in Asset Accounting additional account object I dont have business area at all.
My questions ?
1.To rectify this where I have to make this BA field as ready input in customizing ?
2.If it is yes in Additional Accounts Objects in AA how I can define newAdd Acc Obj in customizing ? Is it possible ?
Can you plz explain with clear answer becz we are trying since pasy 2 days but the results are hopeless.
Waiting for quick reply.

Hi E Pericherla
Have you checked up the relevant Asset master, regarding Cost Center and BA Assigned there.
REgards
Chandrasekaran

Gl Account Assignments

Hi,
GL Account assignments for Automatic Postings are done at Chart of accounts level or is at company code Level?It's done at chart of accounts Level right.
Thanks

Hi,
Which type of automatic postings, that you are talking about?
In most of the cases automatic account determination will be done at COA level only.
Ex:
1) Exchange loss / gain
2) OBYC settings ( integration with MM)
3) Cash discounts receoved)
4) Cash discounts given
5) Bank charges
and so on....
Thanks,
Srinu

Account Assignments - Urgent

Dear Gurus,
What are account assignments for cost centers and how are they configured?
Thanks.
regards,
Raj

Hi Zaid,
Thanks for the reply... here is what I had been asked to do..."would you check the account assignment for cost centers".
Can you help me on this.
Thanks.
regards,
Raj

Error creating a contract with multiple account assignments

Hallo,
I have created a PO agreement with a single account assignment on tr - ME31K.
If I open this agreement and open the account assignments for an item I'm able to press the "Change display" button. In the screen which is showed I'm able to set the distribution to set the distribution to 1 - Distribution on quantity basis. If I do so I get the following error message: " Enter Acc. ***. Block". The only thing I could do is set this indicator!. But when I set this indicator this indicator is resettled and the message appears again.
The thing I want to do is that it is possible to create a contract whit multiple account assignments.
Could any one say what is missing or what is wrong?
My SAP version is 47x110 SR1.
Kind regards,
Richard MeijnError creating a contract with multiple account assignments

Rahul,
The reason why I created a contract with a single Account Assignment is that it was not possible to save the document.
So I created a document for my example and want to change it to a multiple Account assignment. So I did the steps as described.
After adding a extra account line and pressing Enter I get the error message as described: "Enter Acc. ***. Block".
There must be a setting wring in the IMG but I don't know which one?
I have looked ad transaction "OME9" but couldn't see the cause.
Kind Regards,
Richard Meijn

Asset issue 'Expense account for ord. dep. below zero' could not be found

Hi All
During asset depreciation run system prompt error message as u2018Account 'Expense account for ord. dep. below zero' could not be foundu2019 to avoid this we have retired the asset with scrapping after that we have executed the asset depreciation, system prompt the same error message.
To avoid the below configuration due to the reason we have retired the asset.
Financial Accounting - Asset accounting - Integration with the General Ledger - Assign G/L Accounts.
Can you please explain briefly?

without doing any configuration setup is it possible to rectify the error message. Please explain asset retirement with scrap had done on last year, asset depreciation running in current year, why the above error message is showing, please clarify.

How to Open & Close the periods in Asset Accounting for Depreciation.

Dear All,
How to to How to Open & Close the periods in Asset Accounting for Depreciation ? Please let me know
If there is any T.Code or procedure for it.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj.

Dear Alex ,
1) I am facing one problem that one of my asset 123 I Capitalized on 13.09.2006 have deactivated on
14.05.2008. with value of Rs.1.00.000/- all the activities are closed down related it on deactivation date.
In 2009 a new asset 456 purchased with different value. But in T.code OARP in column cumulative acquisition
value it is showing value of Asset 123 instead of it's own capitalization value.
2 ) And about my Asset 123 it is also showing a Cumulative Acquisition value in year 2009 which it
should not display because I have already deactivated that asset. ( The same checked in AR03 )
Please help.
Your help is highly appreciated.
Regards,
Pankaj.
P.S :- Keep the discussion on for further assistance.

Free of charge po line items for all account assignments

Dear All,
Is there any setting by which for all account assignments/item category combinations, I should get option to create free of charge PO line items, irrespective of the preceeding documents through which I prepare PO (from PR).
I have checked in account assignment configuration and didnt find any fields that favor the setting.
Please let me know if there is any customization setting for above requirement.
Best Regards,
Krishna

Hi,
The 'Free Items' indicator in the overview is only used to facilitate
the switching off of the Inv.Receipt flag and the GR-based IV flag.
Note that the 'Free Items' indicator is not stored on the PO item
table EKPO.
The Inv.Receipt flag (and the GR-based IV flag) are the fields that
really controls if an item is 'free' or not.
So, the field is initiated based on the values in those fields rather
than from input from the user.
When an invoice is expected it's not a free-item. This indicator
invoice receipt is chosen from the main-item and also from the
customization maintained for item category 0 in table T163.
I am afraid that I have to say that in standard SAP design
it is not possible to default the "Free item" flag.
Regards,
Edit

Object assignments for account group

Hi,
In customer when I click on assigned object in additional data,I am getting the following error,
"Account group ZSP1 is not registered for object assignments"
Where ZSP1 is my account group.
Where I can register my account group for object assignments
Regards

Hi Sandeep,
for what you are looking for object name of release group.???
If you want to add release group in Authorization profile,it is not possible.
You can add Release code in authorization profile...not release group.
If you have any specific requirement,please let me know.
Regards,
Manish.
If ans is usefull,don't forget to reward.

Account Assignments for depreciation below zero

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for