Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition

Hi,
Multiple Account Assignments for purchase/framework requisition:
The actual MM configuration is a single account assignment in the purchase requisition (although the option of multiple account assignments exist for trips). What are the implications at GR posting? Assuming that we could use the option for quantity and percentage distribution.
Regards
Suresh

Hi
Multiple account assignment:
<b>Specifying Multiple Account Assignment</b>
This procedure allows you to apportion the costs associated with a PR/PO item (among several cost centers, for example).
With multiple account assignment, the account assignment data entered takes the form of individual account assignment items.
<b>Prerequisites</b>
When specifying multiple account assignment for an item, you must consider the following points:
1.How is the net value of a PO item to be distributed (apportioned) among the individual account assignment items?
The costs can be allocated on a quantity or percentage basis (for example, 10 pieces or 10% of the order value to cost center 100).
2.How are the costs to be apportioned if only a part of the ordered quantity has been delivered and invoiced?
The partial invoice amount can be distributed proportionally, i.e. evenly, among the account assignment items of a purchase order.
The partial invoice amount can be distributed on a "progressive fill-up" basis, i.e. the invoiced amount is allocated to the individual account assignment items one after the other. Only when account assignment item 1 has been charged in full is item 2 charged; only when account assignment item 2 has been charged is item 3 charged, and so on. This process continues until the total invoice value of the PO item is reached.
<b>Procedure</b>
1.When entering an item, specify the account assignment category for the desired item on the item overview screen.
2.Choose Item -> Account assignments.
The account assignment window appears.
3.Enter the account assignment data for the first account assignment item.
Choose Change display to call up the multiple account assignment screen.
4.In the item fields (upper part of this screen) enter the relevant data:
– Select the GR non-val. field to designate the GR for this item as non-valuated (as the item has been ordered for direct consumption).
– In the Distribution field, specify whether the costs are to be apportioned on a quantity basis or by percentage.
– In the Partial invoice field, specify whether the value of a partial invoice is to be allocated to individual account assignment items successively, whereby one is debited in full before a posting is made to another one (in which case, some account assignment items may not be debited at all as a result of a particular invoice), or whether the value of such a partial invoice is to be distributed among all account assignment items in equal portions.
5.For each account assignment item, enter either the quantity or the percentage of the total value to be charged to the relevant account assignment item.
To enter further items with the same account assignment data, choose Edit -> Repeat account assignment -> Switch on. The account assignment data will then be automatically adopted in the next item.
6.Repeat as necessary for other items.
7.Save the purchase order.
A vendor submits an invoice for 60% of the total order value. The cost of the ordered goods is to be divided equally among cost centers 1 - 5 (that is, 20% of the total cost is to be borne by each).
If you specified for the PO item that the value of a partial invoice is to be debited to the individual account assignment items on a "progressive fill-up" basis, cost centers 1 to 3 will each be debited with their full 20% share of the total cost on the basis of this partial invoice, whereas cost centers 4 and 5 will not be charged at all. (The latter two cost centers will not be debited until the remaining amount is invoiced.)
Regards
Ramakrishna

Similar Messages

  • Service PO - Multiple account assignments for service line items

    Hi All,
    I'm trying to create a service purchase order using BAPI 'BAPI_PO_CREATE1'.
    But i need to create service line items with multiple account assignments say
    For line item 10 -
    1)Service line 1 -Cost center 'XYZ'.
    2)Service line 2 -Cost center 'ABC'.
    In POACCOUNT there is no option to specify the service line item .
    Moreover in POSERVICES also there is no option to mention costcenter.
    How can i create the same...
    Thanks in advance
    Regards
    Prasanthi

    Dear Prithviraj,
    CAPEX (Category 'A'), can it apply to OPEX/Blanket and Sm. Proj?
    I know create multiple account assigment under ME51N/ME52N.
    Any solution by using FM (BAPI_REQUISITION_CREATE and  BAPI_REQUISITION_CHANGE)?
    thanks
    Regards,
    Weng

  • Purchase Requisition Release Strategy - multiple account assignments

    Hello,
    We would like to be able to create a purchase requisition where each line item can have 1of 3 account assignments (KNTTP).  These 3 account assignments all have the same Release Strategy.  Our expectation was that the purchase requisition would have a release strategy but it doesn't.  If we use 1 account assignment withmultiple line items we get a Release Strategy but if we mix them we get nothing.
    Does anyone know how to make the Release Strategy show up for multiple account assignments that share the same Release Strategy?
    Regards,
    Corinne Taylor

    Dear Corinne Taylor,
    You may assign a BLANK value in the characteristic:
    You can add also as " " and named it as BLANK so you can have your release strategy get trigger
    for all MRP account assignment or multiple account assignment.
    Example setup
    Account assignment A
    Account assignment K
    Release group X1 strategy 01 classfication has blank in values.
    Classification:
    Value Description
    A         Account assignment A
    K        Account assignment K
               BLANK
    Test this and it will work.
    Best Regards,
    Ian Wong

  • Multiple account assignment in purchase requisition

    hi,
    when we are using multiple account assignment in purchase requisition we are getting following messege:
    error 1 : "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set for multi acct. assgt."
    error 2 : "Multi acct. assgt. not allowed for ind. cust. req. or engineer-to-order"
    please suggest if i need to change configuration...
    thanks,
    shreya

    hi,
    error 1 : "Distr. ind. and partial invoice ind. must be set for multi acct. assgt."
    OME9- change the options other than nil, in distribution and partial invoice option, according to the requirement
    error 2 : "Multi acct. assgt. not allowed for ind. cust. req. or engineer-to-order"
    -can u check the system messages.
    (seems u r using M account assignment)
    OME9- activating the multiple account setting, and other fields depends on your business requirement.
    Edited by: Suresh Shenoy on Jan 29, 2008 6:27 AM

  • Non valuated Goods Receipt for materials with multiple account assignments

    We have been using multiple a/c assignments for services on purchase orders for sometime with no issues.  Recently we used a multiple a/c assignment distribution for a material P/O.  this didn't work the same and the Goods Receipt was set as non valuated.
    This leaves the cost showing as a commitment and we do not get any actual costs charged at the GR point until we get and post the invoice.  This only happens with multiple account assignments, all material P/O goods receipts for single assignments get valuated.
    Were not sure why this happens, and want it treated the same.  Is there any way we can get these valuated the same way single assignment materials or multi assignment services are.
    The non valuated GR flag is getting set automatically, but we can't see where this is coming from for this scenario, so were a bit stuck.
    Any advice/direction would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks
    Graham

    Hi Deshamol, No the materials are all valuated, as mentioned, they all work fine when used as single a/c assignment.
    Anupam, Your answer doesn't make sense to me, this is 1 line on the P/O, therefore 1 material.  It can't be both valuated and none valuated for each a/c assignment. 
    I have read in a note there there is a business function that you can apply to get this working, has anybody tried it?
    Thanks
    Graham

  • Multiple account assignment for asset

    Hi,
    I had created PO with multiple account assignment for asset. PO is created with one line item having 5 qty and in multiple account assignment 5 assets are entered with qty distribution.
    I have issue with commitment distribution for all the account assignment. when i post migo(GR) the value is posting for only first one asset not for all.
    So in the purchase order for the remaining account assignment commitment remain left.
    Reagrds,
    Umesh
    Edited by: Umesh Agrawal on May 15, 2009 6:43 AM

    Hi,
    1st check in OME9 t.code for account assignment A, the selection of 2(Multiple account ***)in field ID: AcctAssgt Scrn and Distribution field as 1.
    Then during PO creation for single line item  & in Item details TAB, in account assignment segment, you enter qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with asset number(A1) with  G/L account ( different G/L Account) OR enter  qty with asset number (A1) with G/L account for 1st Line and for 2nd line keep  qty. with another asset number(A2) with  G/L account (different G/L Account)
    ####Example-1: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12346u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12347u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12348u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    G/L account (12346): Dr
    G/L account (12347): Dr
    G/L account (12348 ):Dr
    #####Example-2: in account assignment segment     , if you have
    G/L account----
    Asset
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A1
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A2
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A3
    12345u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026u2026A4
    Having a concept that GR is non-valuated and accounting entries in invoice (without tax) are:
    Vendor A/C: Cr
    G/L account (12345): Dr
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • PO with multiple account assignments - non valuated / valuated GR

    Hi Experts,
    If I create a PO for goods with multiple account assignments the GR will not be valuated, but if I do the same for a service PO the GR will be valuated.
    What is the reason for this?
    Thanks in advance,
    Francisco Melo

    Hi,
    There is more of a qualitative response to the issue, rather than quantitative, If you go through SAP Note 204252 for GR of material it says that: "We have not implemented this function since users who post goods receipts would have to determine the distribution to individual account assignment items during partial deliveries. Generally, users cannot or should not determine this.
    An automatic distribution also causes problems and is also not implemented due to technical reasons".
    Means basically here a stores guy is doing GR and he maynot be competent enough to decide on the Account assignment front.
    However in general the service entry sheet is filled by departments who have got the work done, and are aware of the account assignment for that work.
    Hope this is helpful for you.
    Regards
    Chandra Shekhar

  • Parked MM invoice and multiple account assignments (table RBCO) ?

    Hi.
    Could someone please explain how the table RBCO works for parked MM invoice and multiple account assignments.
    What I have observed in this table are:
    1. Every position (table RSEG)  in the invoice can have several lines (table RBCO) with account assignment.
    2, If there is only one record for a position, the key in the table RBCO starts with 0002, field RBCO-COBL_NR (???)
    3. IF I add one more line to the psoition, the first line CHANGES the key in table RBCO from 0002 to 0001 and the second line gets RBCO-COBL_NR = 0002
    4. The third line gets 0003.
    5. If i delete line 1-2, the remaining one line gets a new key feild RBCO-COBL_NR = 0002.
    The reason for understanding how this works is that i need to make a Z-table storing the history of changes done to records in table RBCO (..don’t ask why...)
    Lest say, I make a change for in an invoice for one of the positions, how do I compare the values in the itab, YDRSEG[]-CO[]- with the lines in table RBCO ?
    And whats the logic for the key in table RBCO?
    Please advice, Tom

    -

  • Subsequent credit to PO with multiple account assignments

    Good Morning -
    In ECC 6.0 when posting a subsequent credit to a purchase order that has multiple account assignments, the posting adds a commitment back onto the purchase order.  This works opposite of the subsequent credit that is posted to a purchase order that has a single account assignment.  Is there a fix that does not allow the commitment to be added to the purchase order?
    Thanks.
    Dan Scott

    Hi Dan,
    I would advice you to have a look at notes 1494239 and 1432085.
    And in case you enter new account assignment in MIRO (unplanned acc. ***) pls. read the notes 496557 and  1446793.
    Kind regards,
    Edit

  • Error creating a contract with multiple account assignments

    Hallo,
    I have created a PO agreement with a single account assignment on tr - ME31K.
    If I open this agreement and open the account assignments for an item I'm able to press the "Change display" button. In the screen which is showed I'm able to set the distribution to set the distribution to 1 - Distribution on quantity basis. If I do so I get the following error message: " Enter Acc. ***. Block". The only thing I could do is set this indicator!. But when I set this indicator this indicator is resettled and the message appears again.
    The thing I want to do is that it is possible to create a contract whit multiple account assignments.
    Could any one say what is missing or what is wrong?
    My SAP version is 47x110 SR1.
    Kind regards,
    Richard MeijnError creating a contract with multiple account assignments

    Rahul,
    The reason why I created a contract with a single Account Assignment is that it was not possible to save the document.
    So I created a document for my example and want to change it to a multiple Account assignment. So I did the steps as described.
    After adding a extra account line and pressing Enter I get the error message as described: "Enter Acc. ***. Block".
    There must be a setting wring in the IMG but I don't know which one?
    I have looked ad transaction "OME9" but couldn't see the cause.
    Kind Regards,
    Richard Meijn

  • Multiple account assignment for distribution of freight cost in MIRO Transaction

    Hi MM Gurus
    I have created one Purchase order with multiple account assignment for Asset 'A' in which freight cost is added.
    I have done good receipt in which only material document is generated. (No financial document generated).
    While doing the MIRO for the same Purchase order I m not able to view delivery cost for the same.
    I  check this thing in SDN but no concrete solution ..
    My question is how to capture delivery cost in Multiple account assignment Purchase roder
    Regards
    Amit

    Hi,
    You have done goods receipt for Asset PO but no accounting document created. Now cross check in t.code:OME9 and find GR Non-Valuated check box selected which cause your concern on why your accounting document created for goods receipt for Asset PO!
    Check how delivery cost designed for your Asset Purchase, may be in your case - delivery cost added  to your asset purchase- which result, you could not find delivery cost in invoice posting!
    Regards,
    Biju K

  • Want information on the LOG_MM_MAA_1 (func of multiple account assignments)

    I want information on the LOG_MM_MAA_1 (func of multiple account assignments on PO's and PR's)
    -Dipnarayan

    Hi Sen,
    Please refer information in SAP help
    MM Multiple Account Assignment - Business Functions (SAP Enhancement Package 4 for SAP ERP 6.0) - SAP Library
    Business function specification is not required for activation.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Deepak Kori

  • The default account option in iOS for contacts is missing; while I have multiple account options for mail and contacts are turned on for iCloud and other accounts.

    The default account option in iOS for contacts is missing; while I have multiple account options for mail and contacts are turned on for iCloud and other accounts.  I previously was able to select between my Microsoft Exchange Contacts (work account) and iCloud (personal), but both those options are now gone.  I tried turning contacts for both off and on and rebooting, but it didn't help.  Any ideas?

    Just a guess but if the exchange account is from your employer, your employer may have installed a security profile to your device preventing you from adding or editing contacts in the exchange account by removing the Default Account setting.  You would need to check with your employer's IT department to confirm this.  You could also test this by adding a Gmail account and turning on contacts syncing with Gmail to see if the setting reappears.

  • Value mismatch in ME23N and MIRO for PO with multiple account assignments

    Hello All,
    I've a PO for indriect material procurement with no material master and I've a single PO item with Account Assignment Category as "K" (Cost Center) and Net Price as "1,357.91". Account Assignment has been distributed by percentage such that 50% goes to a cost center and the remaining 50% goes to another cost center.
    When I do MIRO, the amount comes as "1.357,92". This is because, the actual PO price "1,357.91" is divided by 2 equal half due to multiple account assignment and the individual amount comes to 678.955. And this is rounded off to 678.96 and multiplied by 2 in MIRO and the final amount comes to "1357.92". So as you see, the variance between PO price and MIRO price is 0.01.
    How to get rid of this variance? Can something be done to match the PO value and MIRO value the same?
    Thanks for your inputs.
    Sankar

    HI Sankar,
    This is a standard behaviour as Currencies with 2 decimals will be getting rounded off. One work around to avoid posting of Small differences in Invoices (DIF accounts) is to maually change the amount in the Account assignment in the Invoice line to match to PO line total.
    Regards,
    Kathir

  • Funds Mangement - Multiple Account Assignments in Stock procurement (PR/PO)

    In any unassigned Purchase requisition / Order ( purely stock procurement, not for an order, cost center etc.) it is understood that Fund center has to be entered manually if it were to consume budget. How can i assign multiple Fund centers for a single item of a PR/PO.
    e.g. I am procuring 100 units of a material, of which 50 item should consume budget of Fund center1 and other 50 should consume budget of FC2.
    In ME51N screen, multiple account assignment icon is disabled unless we give account assignment category other than blank. is there any enhancement / exit that can be used to make it available to assign multiple fund centers.
    Thanks in advance
    Chris

    If I have 50 fund centers, 50 line items are carried from PR to RFQ and MM has to maintain prices for 50 line items though the material is one and will have problem at the time of partial goods receipts also. Can you think any work around for this ?
    according to Warehouse concept1, FM account assignments are know before purchasing and are entered in MM document. I am hoping SAP would have thought about scenario where multiple FM accounts are too many - Solution to this problem would save us lot of time , energy.
    Thanks in Advance
    Chris

Maybe you are looking for