Actual activity pricing - KSII

why do the actual activity pricing is required using Tcode KSII ?

it totally depends on business requirement,
Normally you valuate/absorb overhead on product with plan activity rate and using same rate inventory is valuated.Though for same activity may incurr more actual cost which is not getting reflected in planned rate.
This kind of requirements are handled through actual pricing.In this case using SAP splitting calculate actual rate and revaluate inventories.This will adjust you p/l with this amount.
regards,
ashok

Similar Messages

  • Collective Order Actual Activity Pricing

    Hi Gurus
    We are using collective orders for production orders. As you know collective processes are used for costing shared processes.
    Let me explain the problem with an example: Say, we have product A and B to be produced. These two have shared operations and costs will be collected via collective orders by Tcode mill_oc.
    The process is as below:
    Production order 1 for product A. - Normal production order - CO01
    Production order 2 for product B. - Normal production order - CO01
    Production order 3 for product A - Collective production order - mill_oc
    Confirmations are done for Order 3 during period. At the end of the period Order 3 is settled to Order 1 and Order 2 with certain proportions.
    Actual activity price is calculated via Tcode:KSII. During CKMLCP the system valuates activities (posting price differences) for Order 3 product, Product A only. It must be the case that Product A and Product B have to be revaluated.
    NOTE: Actual activity price is valuated in material ledger, rather in orders (not with CON2)
    Is there any OSS notes or solution for this problem? If there is huge activity price differences, all the value is posted to just one product, which is collective orders product, rather than both lower level orders' products.
    Thanks in advance for your replies.
    Ahmet

    Hi Ahmet,
    This is rather a problem of material ledger multi-level settlement than of activity pricing. Material ledger will pick up the actual activity price correctly and will use the difference against the former activvity price as multi-level price difference on the production process. The problem is, if there are multiple outputs coming out of the process, as is resulting of the order combination process, material ledger will by default search for a apportionment structure (for joint production) in the material master of the main (or original) output material. As nothing will be maintained there, all the differences will go to this material.
    You can overcome the situation by a BADI implementation of BADI cost_split. There should be an example implementation in your system (if you have the Mill Products add-on active, as is indicated because you use Mill_oc) that enables to distribute the price differences by quantity of the outputs of a process. If you don't find the example implementation I could provide it to you.
    best regards,
               Udo

  • Pricing conditions for the articles are getting triggered one day before the actual activation date to 3rd party systems through job WPMU.

    Hi SAP Guru´s,
    Currently we are sending the pricing, promotions & article master data delta load to 3rd party system from SAP ECC via SAP XI through IDOCS using daily scheduled batch jobs WPMU. IDOC segment - WP_PLU.
    Here the issue is the promotion & pricing data are sent to 3rd party system one day before the actual start date.
    Eg: Promotion 123456 which has start date as 15/05/2014 & ending on 30/05/2014 & was created & activated on 13/05/2014.
    This promotion 123456 is getting triggered from SAP ECC through batch job on 14/05/2014 morning & 3rd party system receives the data on 14/05/2014 & the promotion are getting activated at 3rd party system end on 14/05/2014 itself which actually gets active from 15/05/2014.
    Same in the case for Standard Pricing data which needs to be active from 31/05/2014 once the promotion 123456 ends on 30/05/2014.
    The standard pricing data gets triggered from SAP ECC on 30/05/2014 through batch job & reaching 3rd party system on 30/05/2014 & getting activate on 30/05/2014 itself.
    This creates more issues at the store end as well as affecting business.
    We checked at 3rd party system end & they replied that their system considers the updated time stamp & date to activate the prices & it does not considers the actual active from & active to date. They need the data to be sent from SAP ECC on the effective date of the pricing & promotions.
    Can any one help me how to change the pricing conditions beign triggered through batch job in SAP ECC based on the actual promotion & pricing conditons start date or is there any other process to trigger the data through the batch job on the actual promotion & pricing data activation date.
    Thanks in Advance.
    Thanks & Regards,
    P.P.Shankar

    Hello Shankar,
    Change the lead time in the POS Outbound Profile. You can't put less than 2 days there so data for today and tomorrow will be transferred which also means you need to adjust your batch timing accordingly.
    Sales and Distribution -> POS Interface -> Outbound -> Maintain Profile for POS Outbound.
    See if it helps. The best option would still be that the 3rd part system considers the activtion date.
    Kind Regards
    Kaizad

  • Actual Activity Price calculation; KSII

    Hello,
    I am trying to calculate actual activity price but the system does not calculate the price though I have soecified the appropriate price indicator '5' in the Activity type master record.
    Any help would be appreciated.
    Thanks in advance!

    Something doesn't seem right here. You created an Activity Price and plugged in the Plan Fixed and Variable price for the Activity in KP26.
    So why are you running KSII now? KSII is for Actual Activity Price Calculation, run at month-end after all your POs have been closed and activities booked.
    Can you provide additional info.?
    Cheers.

  • KSS2 KSII  Actual activity price calculation

    Dear Grus !
    I want to carry out actual activity price calculation.    I assigned activity type act 100 to act500 to different cost element, and also assigned splitting rule 12.
    also entered activity plan price in KP26. cost element planning in KP06.
    When I carry out KSS2, system distribute cost of one cost element to activity types according to the target cost maintained in KP06.   I want the result that cost distributed as maintained in the splitting rule.
    is there any specific configuration that i missed?
    Thank you all ~
    Lynn

    Check whether you have maintained the Equivalence number for the activity type and cost center combination in KP26.
    Also you have to run the KSPI before running KSII, because KSII result is the iterative one.
    Hope this will help you.
    Kamlesh

  • Customer order actual activity report

    Dear experts,
    I am using make to order strategy and I have a multilevel BOM structure. I am following some semi-finished products individually for customer order and some for make to stock. I need a report to see the actual activity confirmations for a single customer order including all the activities of semi-finished products in BOM. For your help please.

    Hi Ahmet,
    This is rather a problem of material ledger multi-level settlement than of activity pricing. Material ledger will pick up the actual activity price correctly and will use the difference against the former activvity price as multi-level price difference on the production process. The problem is, if there are multiple outputs coming out of the process, as is resulting of the order combination process, material ledger will by default search for a apportionment structure (for joint production) in the material master of the main (or original) output material. As nothing will be maintained there, all the differences will go to this material.
    You can overcome the situation by a BADI implementation of BADI cost_split. There should be an example implementation in your system (if you have the Mill Products add-on active, as is indicated because you use Mill_oc) that enables to distribute the price differences by quantity of the outputs of a process. If you don't find the example implementation I could provide it to you.
    best regards,
               Udo

  • Error while updating the Actual Activity Prices

    Dear All,
    While calculating the Actual activity prices under test run (KSII) ,the system is calculating the prices correctly, but when I run the KSII after deselecting the test run ,the system is giving the following error message:
    Cost center EE04301000 activity type RWKHRS: costs exist although activity 0
    Message no. KP250
    Diagnosis
    The plan or actual activity for cost center EE04301000, activity type RWKHRS is 0. However, costs were planned or posted in period(s) 1.
    System Response
    The SAP System cannot calculate activity prices for this activity type as this would involve division by zero. The plan or actual costs are ignored in activity price calculation.
    Procedure
    Check activity price calculation in planning for activity type RWKHRS in cost center EE04301000 and the costs planned for period(s) 1.
    Activity Type Planning
    Primary Cost Planning
    For activity price calculation in actual, actual costs are allocated onto the activity type through splitting, although no activity posting was made on this activity type.
    The scenario is that we have 4 activity types and planned costs/activity qty for all the 4 activities and calculated plan prices and posted actual costs for all the four types. Production Order created and confirmed only 3 activities out of 4 activities. And when we calculate the Actual prices for all 4 activities the system is giving the above said message.
    Please suggest as how to solve this issue.  
    Regards
    Subbu

    Hi Subbu
    The error is very much justified.. If your actual qty for any act type is zero, then division by zero would yield an error during activity price calculatoin
    You need to ignore this error, if the zero qty for 4th act type is justified.. System would post act price for remaining 3 act types...
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Actual Price Calculation (KSII)

    hi,
    I am not able to get the actual prices for my production order.
    I maintained certain settings for actual price calculation in OKEQ.
    Does it is mandatory to run the MFN1 (Revaluation of actual prices) before the KSII.
    Srinivas

    Hi Sateesh,
    Please find below the process for calculation of Actual Activity Prices:
    1. Define Splitting structure, rules (method). I am sure you would have done this
    2. Assign the splitting structure to Cost Centers. I hope you would be done this as well
    3. Actual values (Costs and quantitative details) will get collected to cost centers in the following way:
         - Quantities will get collected to Cost Centers once the confirmation of activities are done for the        production order.  Please make sure that "Record Quantity" check box is selected for the relevant secondary cost elements. 
         - Values will get collected from FI to the primary cost elements
    you may check whether the values have been properly collected to the cost center using the cost center reports
    4. Execute cost Split using - KSS2
    5. Then calculate Actual activity unit price - KSII
    6. Once the prices are successfully calculated, you can check the prices in KP26
    7. after this process is completed then you can revaluate you production orders using the actual activity prices
    I hope i made is clear.
    Let me know if you need further details in this regard
    Surya

  • Actual activity allocation / revaluation

    Hi All,
    My company is using SAP ISH (healthcare) in order to book Services to patient cases.  We have linked the Services to some activity types which are generated by the Performing Unit in ISH.  The Performing unit is linked to a cost centre in CO where the planned Activity rate has been set up (KP26).  The patient case is linked 1:1 with an internal order in CO which receives the activity posting.
    My company would like to ensure that all of the costs relevant to these activities are allocated out of the cost centre on to the receiving internal orders at month end.  I have not worked in CO for a few years but I believe that this will involve a couple of steps in the month end process.
    1 Re-calculate the actual activity prices
    2 Revalue the actual postings
    Each cost centre generates 2 or more activities which need to be valued.  Example below
    Performing unit THEATRE1 - Operating theatre, performs operations on 2 patient cases
    CASE1 - Knee replacement
         Activity type - Consumables = 100 units @ £2ea = £200
                              Drugs = 10 units @ £30ea = £300
    CASE2 - Hip Replacement
         Activity type - Consumables = 200 units @ £2ea = £400
                              Drugs = 50 units @ £30ea = £1500
    Total credit to the THEATRE1 cost centre
    Consumables - £600
    Drugs - £1800
    At month end the actual costs posted to the cost centre are as follows
    Consumables - £800
    Drugs - £2000
    In order to credit the full amount to the Internal orders from the cost centre the prices must be recalculated and the activity allocation transactions need to be revalued.
    Can you please confirm the steps to configure the month end price calculation (specifically around the splitting rule on the cost centre to determine which costs belong to which activity type), and steps to process the revaluation of the transactions?
    Many thanks
    Phil

    Hi Philip,
    When u work with cost center independent planning system can't underunderstand which GL account and cost center should plan with respective activity. For that reason  we create splitting structures.
    Cost center splitting is used in Cost Center Independent Planning where in KP06 you have cost center and cost element only. In this screen, you will not find Activity.
    So, to give a relationship between Cost center, cost element, and activity, we will do splitting structure in OKES, and assign it to cost center in OKEW.
    When you do KSS2, it will split the costs based on the splitting structure between activities and cost centers.
    In this case, you have to maintain qty values in KP26 and later do KP06.
    E.g.: we have 3 cost elements:
    Salary - 100000
    Depreciation - 200000
    Electricity - 100000
    Total = 400000
    Activities:
    Labour - 500 hrs
    Machine - 1000 hrs
    Total = 1500 hrs.
    Here, when u calculate per hour rate system wi'll consider total amount / total activity hours.
    = 400000/1500 = 226 INR/per hour
    Here, if you want to consider salary amount only with Labour hours and deprecation and electricity for machine hours. 
    For this we will create splitting structure to provide link between cost elements and activity.
    In the alove example salaries Wilkinson be linked to labour activity abduction dep and electricity will be linked to .machine hours.
    When you run KSPI it will split the cost between respective cost elements and activities. Here, for salary per hour cost would be 100000/500 = 200 per hour.
    Also machine per hour rate would be 300000/1000 hours = 300 per hour.
    Same will happen in the case of KSII. I.e. actual cost/ activity hours Between respective cost elements and activity.
    Hope you understand the basic concept of splitting structure.
    BR, Srinivas Salpala

  • Actual Activity allocation and Planned and actual activity comparison issue in Product Costing

    Friends,
    I have tried to explain the issue i am facing currently under Product Costing......
    1.Cost Component Structure
    10 – Material
    20 – Labour
    30 – Diesel
    40 – Electricity
    2.KP26 – Planned under Fixed Price
    Labour – 2.0 HR
    Diesel – 1.0 HR
    Electricity – 5.0 HR
    3. When I run CK11N system collecting correct rates for all activities (Costing Lot Size- 1)
    Like;
    1              E              LAB10    994310                  2.00        2.00        AED        1.0          HR Labour Cost New
    2              E              DIE20    994320                  5.00        5.00        AED        1.0          HR Diesel Cost New
    3              E              ELE30    994330                  1.00        1.00        AED        1.0          HR Electricity Cost
    4              M            1100000042                          5.00        0.00        AED        1              PC RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    5              G            994201                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Depriciation Cost
    6              G            994202                                0.00        0.00        AED                        Sales & Distribution Cost
                                                                              13.00                    AED       
    4.When I do process order Cost analysis for the produced goods it shows me different figures as my
    BOM – RM is 1100000042 1 Quantity
    Routing – All activity time is 1 Hr
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      1.33
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      3.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      0.67
                                                                                                                                              2.67- AED
    Note :- As per my understanding it should be
        Labour Cost New                                            2.00
                    Diesel Cost New                                              5.00
                    Electricity Cost                                                1.00
    5.Now after Process Order confirmation
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042            5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071            00.00
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10      4.00
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20      5.00
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30      2.00
                                                                                                                                              16.00
    6.For Month end actual Activity calculation and load the activaty actual rates on product
    I have configured the system in below manner
    1 Work center = Mapped to 1 Production Cost center
    Three Different Activities mapped to Secondary Cost Element with 43 Category
    For Electrictity Activity assesment from Primary to secondary 1 more cost element created with
          Category 42 Like; 994215-Electricity Cost All
    One Actual Assessment has been configured to allocate Electricity cost from Primary Cost element to
          Product/Order
    7.Assessment Cycle Details
    Controlling Area      1000 Controlling Area
    Cycle                ZELE01                  Status    Reviewed
    Start Date 01.01.2014  To  31.10.2014
    Text                  Elec. Cost Allocation to PROD
    IND- Interactive
    Assessment CEle       994215      Electricity Cost All
    Sender
    Cost Center    CBAKYDXBAD
    Cost Element 40204
    Receiver
    Cost Center    CBAKYPDDXB
    Tracing Factor
    Var.portion type – Actual Activity
    Selaction Criteria
    Activity Type - ELE30
    Receivers Tracing Factor
    Cost Ctr Factor per        100
    CBAKYPDDXB 100
    8.I have received the actuall electricity bill for 1100 AED and the same has accocated through KSU5
    After Cycle run when I follow below procedure
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB01                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE02                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE03                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                DIE20                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                ELE30                    183.33
    CBAKYPDDXB                    Production Dxb                LAB10                    183.35
                                                                                                                    1100.00
    Issue – System Split Electricity cost between all the activities assigned to Workcentres Cost Centre.
    But I want to post that cost only to ELE30 Activity and not for all
    When I RUN KSSI for actual Price determination system shows
    OTy        Object                                  Name                  AUn                Act Qty      Total price    Price (Fixed)              PUnit
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20        Production Dxb      HR                  5.0          366.66                  366.66                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.65                  916.65                    10
    ATY        CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10        Production Dxb      HR                  2.0          916.75                916.75                    10
                                                                                                                                                          2200.06
    2200.06 is almost double than 1100.00 which is actual electricity cost and the same is actually determined for all the activities.
    After revaluation of the process order system posting below values
    40002                    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED          1005/1100000042                            5.00        5.00
    40015                    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED              1005/4400000071                            13.00-    13.00-
    994310                  Labour Cost New                                            CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10                      1.33        183.35
    994320                  Diesel Cost New                                              CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20                      3.33        183.33
    994330                  Electricity Cost                                                CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30                      0.67        183.33
                                                                                                                                                              2.67-      542.01
    Production Variance is posted as 542.01….
    I strongly believe there is some issue in configuration for activity allocation….
    Main issue is
    Point No. 4 – Different Figures in Process Order Cost Analysis
    Point No. 7 – Assessment cycle run
    Point No. 8 – KSS2 and KSII for Actual cost Allocation and Production variance…
    Friends… I have tried to explain maximum please help me to understand the concept or missing configuration/Process.
    Thanks
    Sagar Chinchkar

    Dear Rajneesh,
    I have made the changes as suggested....
    It seems now my Order Cost analysis and Product cost analysis are showing the same figures.
    I have also maintained cost center splitting structure for ELE30 Activity allocation.
    Structure Z1
    Splitting structure for AT
    Assignment 10
    Electricity Cost
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    Cost Element
    994215
    Activity Type
    ELE30
    Splitting Rule
    100
    Allocation for ELE
    12
    Activity quantity
    Version 0
    In my case actual activity confirmed is 3.1 for 2 orders in period 5
    Order 1 - QTY 2
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1
    Total actual Electricity exp is 1150 in period 5
    followed procedure to post actual activity on product is mentioned below
    KSS2 Actual cost splitting - Result as expected 1150 for ELE30
    KSII Actual price determination - Result as expected 3.1 actual confirmed QTY for ELE30 with actual price
           QTY 3.1         Tot Price 3,709.68        Planned(FIX) 3,709.68     Per Units 10
           (System is doing 1150/3.1*10=3709.68)
        3.CON2 Actual revaluation of orders
          Here while reevaluating the Process Orders system calculation is different
    Order 1 - QTY 2 -   558.00
    Order 2 - QTY 1.1 - 407.56
    Total -                    965.57
         4. After CON2 system is changing the value of other activities like
         LAB10 - Actual confirmed Value 10  to 0 
         DIE20 - Actual  confirmed Value 10  to 0
    Which should not be the case....
                                                                                                                  PL     Act     Var
    40002
    RAW MATERIAL BAKERY CONSUMED
    1005/1100000042
    10.00
    15.00
    50.00
    40015
    COST OF GOODS MANUFACTURED
    1005/4400000074
    26.00-
    26.00-
    994201
    Depriciation Cost
    WMBDDEP01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994202
    Sales & Distribution Cost
    WMBDS&A01
    1.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994310
    Labour Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/LAB10
    4.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994320
    Diesel Cost New
    CBAKYPDDXB/DIE20
    10.00
    0.00
    100.00-
    994330
    Electricity Cost
    CBAKYPDDXB/ELE30
    2.00
    408.06
    20,303.00
    If we want to just post Electricity cost based on actual Electricity expenses and Labor and Diesel are based on planned activity rates.
    What setting is required in current system.....
    Million thanks in advance....
    Regards
    Sagar Chinchkar

  • Actual Activity Price Calculation

    Dear Gurus,
    1. I have defined activity type say "Power" through KL01
    2. Maintained the planned price through KP26 for the cost center which is going to use this activity type. say 
        cost center is "CCTR1"
    3. Now there is something as actual activity price calculation at period end
    4. When i execute through KSII i get the actual price which is the debited cost elements of the "CCTR1"
        divided by the Activity Type "Power"
    5. The debit balance of cost elements in "CCTR1"  is Rs 10000 and activity type consumed through process  
        order is 200 KWH, hence the Actual price comes to Rs 50 Rs/KWH. While the planned price in KP26 is
        Rs 6/KWH
    How logical is this....
    With Regards,
    Amit

    Hi Amit,
    Let me give some insight into the Activity price calculation and cost obsorption from Cost Center to Prodcution
    1. Normally we incur the production cost through FI like Direct Labor, Power, Indirect Labour and other indirectct production overheads
    2. This cost is posted to Production Cost Centers
    3. Now this cost need to be obsorbed to product cost using either Activity costing through Routing or Overhead costing using costing sheet.
    Since you question is for Activity costing, let us focus only on activity price and absorption to Product Cost
    1. All the direct cost that can be tracked with certain reasonability with activity types can be absorbed through activity costing to product costing
    2. Now in your case, take for example - the industry you are working is power intensive, then we can track the consumption of Power using activity costing
    3. At the first instance, you need to forcast the activity quantities for the month (based on the production planning)
    4. Based on this, you forecast the cost that would be incurred for the expected output
    5. Calculate planned Acvitiy Unit price and update it in KP26. The updation can be manual or automatic (using Cost Splitting and Price Calculation in case of Activity independant cost planning)
    6. For all the activity confirations to the production/process order, the cost obsorption will take place based on the planned price
    Actual
    7. The cost of the power will be booked in FI and posted to Production Cost Center for the month.
    8. The actual Activity quantity will be booked from Production confirmation for the month
    9. At the end of the month, you need to do the actual price calculation.  This calculation will be based on the TOTAL COST BOOKED FOR THE MONTH TOWARDS POWER FOR THAT COST CENTER DEVIDED BY TOTAL QUANTITY CONSUMPTION RECORDED IN THE COST CENTER
    10. Once this is done, You can revaluate the activity quanitities booked on each of the production order.
    This is how the activity cost aborption will take place in product costing
    Please let me know if you need further details in this regard
    Surya

  • Actual Activity Cost

    Hi Friends
    For calculating the actual rate system take all the actual activity cost and divide it with actual quantity. I want to know how the system is calculating actual activity cost.
    In KSII system will calculate the actual activity rate. What is the backgroung calculation. Or how to find out the actual activity cost per period is XXXX.
    Regards
    Jos
    Edited by: Joji Jose V on Nov 15, 2010 3:58 PM

    Hi Jose
    1. Actual Activity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center and act type in FI postings / Depreciation postings
    however, this is quite rare... To use this, Act Type must be switched in OKKP in Control Indicators
    2. In absence of (1), Actual Actvity cost means Actual cost posted with cost center
    3. If there are more than one act type in a cost center, then KSS2 would split the costs between the act types based on your Splitting rule in OKES... And then these costs would be divided by Actual Act Qty to calculate the Activity price
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Revaluation of actual activity rates

    <MODERATOR:  please post in the appropriate forum.>
    Dear all,
    My client is having make to order scenario in which at the time of production order confirmation (co14) actual activity is confirmned and loaded to production order as per planned acticity rates maintained in kp26
    i.e actual activity * planned rate , but when actual costs of activities are debited to cost center for these activities there is under/over absorption in cost centers .So i want to know what is to be done for these absorptions .Through sap help i came to know about revaluation tool at actuals ,but how it is done kindly provide some suggestions or any other method of knocking off over /under absorption so that cost of product should be according to actual activity*actual rate.
    Thanks and regards
    vijay

    Hi Vijay,
    I do not have any documentation but I can you the splitting concept one more time. It is more important to understand the concept.
    Suppose you have a cost center 1000 that produces 3 activities in a month. You incur lot of expenses in the cost center, say $10,000, out of which $4,000 are fixed costs, which means these costs can not be identified to one particular activity. There are 10 cost elements which contribute to these costs.
    The other $6,000 are incurred due to activity 1, 2 and 3. There are 5 cost elements which cause these costs.
    Using KP06, you need pair the activity dependent cost elements to the respective activity types and plan the costs.
    This way you can separate variable costs from the fixed costs.
    Splitting job splits the acitivity independent (fixed) costs to 3 activities in the ratio that you set in KP26. You need to assign equivalence numbers in KP26 for each activity type. Let us say you assigned 1, 3 and 5.
    Once you make the above settings, the splitting job will split $4,000 into the 3 activity types into the ratio of 1, 3 and 5.
    When you run KSII, activity price is calculated for each activity, which will be the total costs per activity divided by the actual activity output. So, the KP06 costs will be added to the split costs to determine the activity price.
    Please try the above concept and the t-codes and settings I mentioned yourself and let me know if you face any problems.
    Regards
    Sharabh

  • ACTUAL ACTIVITY RATE CALCULATION

    Hi Gurus,
    Is it possible to calaculate actual activity rate based on plan hours......
    I know that we can splitt the actual cost based on plan hours by selecting splitting rule 22...
    Now im doing actul activity rate calculation through ksii...
    Then system considering actul hours confirmed in production for actual activity calculation.....
    Pls suggest me.
    RAM

    Thank you for prompt reply.
    Suppose this month we have produced only . 10 finished products.... But actual capacity is 20..... What ever cost moniterd by the production cost centers will be loaded on total 10 products only  at the time of revaluation of production orders if we calaculate actul activity rate based on actual hours....... so the cost of the product is getting increased... so that he want to calculate actual rate aslo with planned hours..... Is there any other solution for this..
    Pls suggest me ...... its very urgent.
    Ram

  • CALCULATION OF ACTUAL PRICE CALCULATION  - KSII

    Dear Friends,
    We are using Make to Order scenario and NOT USING Sales order based costing, I would like to calculate Automatic activity price calculation and revaluate my production order with actual prices (MFN1), for this I need to create & assign splitting rules to cost centers & follow the t.codes KSS2, KSII, KBK7 (DISPLAY) and finally MFN1.
    For Calculation of KSS2, how Plan Quantity has to be decided, this because for calculating Operating rate system take the formula as below, whether the below formula is correct?
    Actual quantity/ Planned quantity * variable price
    If for a cost center, postings are happened in FI for 10000/- then how system calculate & segregate this?
    if possible with an small example, when checked in KSS2 it shows the amount of postings from FI with cost elements.
    But when we checked t.code KSII it was showing the some different Actual Activity and variable price. How system takes the Actual activity and Variable Price and is there any report to check this?
    please guide me
    Regards,
    Sandeep
    Edited by: sandeep jain jain on Nov 2, 2009 4:15 PM

    Hi Paolo,
    You were exactly right that it was rounding off.
    But still am not able to get the calculation working for me.
    In Cost Center Report Actual/ Plan it shows
    Debit Assessment Cost Element 10000
    Credit Machine Hour 458.16-
    Credit labour Hour 124.96-
    over/under Absorption 9,416.88
    This are all actual cost.
    When i run KSII the result is as below
    Oty  Object                        Name                    AUn              Activity Qty Total Price     Price(Fixed) PUnit
    ATY MBX273/L1                Testing CCTR         H                 1.666         3,001.20         3,001.20      1
    ATY MBX273/M1                Testing CCTR         H                 1.666         3,001.20         3,001.20      1
    I am not getting how this value  3,001.20  is calculating.
    Kindly help me to under stand this
    Edited by: lolu jo on Oct 28, 2011 3:57 PM

Maybe you are looking for

  • Mac mini thunderbolt port stop working

    Good night. First, I apologize for my English. I have a mac mini (2011 model). Two days ago there was a power outage and the mac shut down. After turning it on, it failed to recognize my TV connected through the Thunderbolt port (with a adapter THUND

  • Can't create MBO from SAP servers

    Hi, I'm trying to create MBO from SAP servers with Sybase Unwired WorkSpace. I created Connection Profile and it worked well(Ping succeeded!). However, I expanded profile tree, no BAPI was shown. Any ideas what is happening here? SAP version is below

  • Countdown to a specific time (Not Midnight)

    Hello All; I have to quickly make a countdown timer for a website that counts down to a specific date & time (Not midnight). I need like May 4th, 2011 at 9:10 AM. I used a tutorial to create a timer that counts down to midnight but need to modify it

  • HTTPS and UWL and port 50001

    When we click on the Manager Self Service tab in SAP portal when using https/ssl (https://server.company.com/irj/portal), all iViews appear correctly except for the UWL which is requested in a non-secure way over port 50000. http://server.company.com

  • BIP report parameters are comming in given sequance.

    Hi.. I have report in which i m passing two parameters. <?param@begin:fromdate?> <?param@begin:todate?> While taking report these parameters are not coming in given sequance means i want first para as Fromdate then todate, but every time todate is ge