Actual Cost incurred

Dear Experts,
        I need the table which contains the actual cost incurred for the project.
Thanks & Regards,
Ashok.

RPSCO
value type 4

Similar Messages

  • Actual cost is not appearing in CJE0 reports.

    Dear All,
    I am facing a problem that when i am running CJE0 t-code for Budgut vs Actual then actual cost incurred on WBS is not showing in reports.
    After settlement cost is showing ' 0' in reports pls. help.
    Thanx in advance
    Vishal Kr. Sharma

    Double click in the row against the WBS on actual column  element where you expect to see you actual cost.
    Regards
    Sreenivas

  • Extraction of actual cost in the project

    hello all,
    Kindly suggest if any function module is available to extract actual cost incurred in the project? The actual cost includes the cost of material consumption, activity confirmation, Fi posting. The intention is to get the total actual cost on the WBS at one place.
    Regards,
    Sudhir

    RESOLVED

  • Actual Cost in Valuated Stock

    Dear PS experts,
         I am facing an issue in case of actual costs in 'valuated project stock' scenario.
          The scenario is as following:
       1. A material(assembly) is attached to network having planned costs as 100 Euros.
       2. The planned costs for project is also now 100 Euros.
       3. This material is assembly made from using 2 materials.
       4. The assembly is made by subcontractor.
       5. The breakup of the costs is 80 euro for 2 material components and 20 euro as subcontracting charges.
       6. When I run MRP and covert a req. to PO, the commitment is 20 euro for subcontracting order and 80 euro for material components PO.
      7. After I receive the 2 material components in stock, the actual cost(statistical cost element is hit) for project becomes 80 euro.
      8. When I send these components to the supplier and he converts it into assembly material, at GR the entries are like this:
              a. Commitment is reduced of 20 euro, actual cost is incurred for 20 euro for subcontracting charges.
              b. The consumption is booked for 2 components(movement type 543), actual cost incurred is 80 euro.
                 So total actual costs at this stage is 100 euros.
    9. Now the assembled material is issued against network activity ( movement type 281 Q), this again updates the the consumption at project with value 100 euro.
       In this way, I am seeing the actual cost at project is 200 euro. I think it is not correct, does anybody have any opinion on this. I am not able to understand if it is related to valuation categories.
      If you are having any clue about it, please let me know. Thanks in advance !
    Regards,
    Mahendra Dighe

    Hi,
    I hope this scenario clarifies your problem.
    assly- X- 100
    material A- 40
    Material B-40
    Sub contracting charges20
    MAterail A & B came to stock (project stock) so inventroy 80 INR(statistical)
    now subcontracting PO for 20 INR
    you can not issue project stock to subcontractor so you have to transfer A & B to plant stock. then do 541 for subcontracting
    now in project you are having actual -0 and commitment 20
    when you confirm subcontract PO then material X with 100rs will come to the stock. this will reflect as 100 INR in project as an inventory. just check cost element report.
    when you issue it to network then inventory become zero and actual consumption shows you 100 INR  again check yourcost element report.
    i think this is how subcontracting works... lets wait for other experts comment.
    I dont understand why you are doing 543 movement ( goods isue for sale order)?
    venkatesh
    Edited by: venkatesh  kulkarni on Dec 3, 2009 8:38 AM

  • Planned cost of PO vs. actual cost of GR

    Hi all,
    I want to view the planned cost of a purchase order and the actual cost incurred by GR of this PO, where can I see these 2 different types of cost? Thanks.
    Regards,
    Michael

    In purchase order history of PO ,you can view

  • Actual cost in production order

    Dear Guru's,
    Please note the following scenario: For a production order of 100 pcs if I wastes/scraps 15 pcs in opeartion then how to capture only the cost of 85 pcs in production order? Please suggest the settings.
    Regards,
    SAP CONS

    Y U want cost for Only 85. It should be for 100
    For Ex
    f0r opern 10 
    Lets take Cost incurred for operation 10 for 100 qtys is 1000 rs
    In Operation 20
    If the cost incurred for 100 is 500, Consider 15 qty as waste
    In operation 30 cost incurred for 30 for qty 85 is 400
    Then the  actual cost incurred for the prdn  is operation 10 + Operation 20 + operation 30
    It should not be for qty 85.
    Edited by: Sundaresan . E. V on Jun 17, 2010 5:57 PM

  • Project POC to determine actual cost and actual revenue

    Dear all experts,
    please help me on the following issue.
    i am working on a project for sales.
    the project actual cost and actual revenue will be determined by the project POC.
    i have read the SAP help about project progress.
    but it confused me.
    my first question is how can i caculated the actual POC?
    is there a standard predefined way to solve it?
    please give me some hints or suggestions.
    thanks a lot.
    Judy

    Hi,
    Can anyone detail the steps involved in carrying out RA with Valuation Method 7 with progressive value analysis. Here, we can give a percentage of POC into the system as certified by the Engineers unlike Valuation method 3 where the POC is calculated on the basis of actual costs incurred.
    In the case of valuation method 3, only revenue is analysed by the system with reference to the POC and necessary entries are posted as Revenue surplus or Revenue in excess of billings. Whereas in the case of valuation method 7, both the revenue and costs are analysed and necessary provisions are made both for revenue and costs.
    Regards,
    Judy

  • Actual Cost of Product with Price control "S"

    Dear Gurus,
    Is there any report available where we can know the Actual Costs of Materials with Price Control "S".
    In the material master field the actual cost in the "Moving Price Tab" of the material with Price Control "S" is available, but is there any report available for plant level?
    Thanks & Regards,
    Amit Dhanurdhari.

    Hi Amit,
    -- Under Standard Costing, you value your inventory at Standard Costs and any variances in Production Process will be settled to Price Difference Account. You will not be able to find out actual cost per unit. In Multi-level BOM scenario under Standard Costing (CO-PC), variances don't get rolled-up to the next level, only costs get rolled-up.
    -- Under Actual Costing - Material Ledger, You will be able to find out the Actual Cost per Unit. Variances get rolled-up to the next level.
    To explain difference between Standard Costing in CO-PC and Material Ledger briefly....
    You have given Price Indicator as "S" in the material master of "X" material (semi finisher or finished) and you are doing Standard Cost Estimate for arriving at Standard Cost per tonne. Let's say, the Standard Cost per tonne is Rs.1000/-
    Now, when you created production order for 10 tonnes and received output of 10 tonnes (GR). But the total cost incurred on that production order is Rs.1100/-. In this situation, actual cost per tonne is Rs.110.
    But, because you are following Standard Costing, When you post GR against this Production Order, inventory will be posted at Standard cost only, i.e., Rs.1000/-. and the balance of Rs.100 will be posted to Price Difference Account. (and parallally the variance of Rs.100/-) will flow to COPA.
    So, it is clear that, though, at Production Order level you can see the actual cost, at "material" level, you will not be able to see the actual cost per tonne.(as long as you are using only Product Costing and Standard Costing)
    Alternatively, if you maintain Price Indicator as "V", you will able to get the Actual Cost per tonne at material level, but there will be no scope for establishing standard cost and comparison with actual thereof.
    But, the same is possible if you are using Material Ledger (CO-ML). If Material Ledger is active, you will be maintaining "S" in the material master, still, the variances will be settled inventory and you will be able to get the actual cost per tonne. (bothe Standard cost estimate, actual cost per tonne will be possible).
    Pls revert back for further explanation
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Actual Cost & Actual Revenue

    Dear Sir,
    Can you please tell me what Actual Cost & Actual Revenue & also what is difference between Actual cost & Actual Revenue.
    Regards,
    Gagandeep Singh.

    Hi,
    IN any project you incur some expenses and at the same time when you sell something you generate revenue. But in the intitial stages you cant say what is the actual cost that you are going to incur or what is the actual revenue you are going to generate at a certain point/phase in a project.
    Actual Cost refers to for eg. suppose you procure a bearing for your project. You will create a PR and then a PO. Until this stage system will treat this as a commitment. Once you do the GR/ GI this cost is converted to actual cost. Similarly lets say that you are building a ship and you have procured some components to build that ship. That procurement will lead to a cost because you are incurring some expenditures. Once you build that ship and sell it and bill the customer you will generate revenue. Till the time you receive the payment/revenue from your customer system treats this as Planned revenue. Once you bill your customer and receive the payment system will treat this is as the actual revenue.
    So basically Actual Cost refers to the expenditures incurred in carrying out a project and Actual revenue refers to the income generated after billing the customer and receiving the payment for the goods sold.
    Its just a basic explanation but hope this clears your query.
    Best Regards,
    Gokul

  • Actual cost not getting capture

    Hi Experts,
    We are using activities to capture cost upon activity confirmation for the labor cost.
    I have set up all required setting for activity types & rates and all.
    System capture plane cost without any issue.
    Actual cost also getting capture only if we put percentage of completion(Processing%) on activity & that is working fine.
    For the activities which are fully confirmed we just tick "Final Conf" & "completed " check box only, then system automatically updates Processing% as 100. In this case actual cost is not getting incurred although activity is full confirmed.
    Please help to overcome this conflict.
    Thanks in advance.
    Kind Regards,
    Sam L.

    Hi,
    Thanks a lot Ahmed for your assistence, I did it & it works as per my requirement.
    when I'm working on that I got to know that if the tick is on for the "propose activity" in confirmation parameters(OPST).
    But if switch on above feature(propose activity), I cant see the completed Processing% since it always shows as 100.
    So other than this, is there any way to stop capculating work forcast by default for all activities?
    kind Regards,
    Sam L.

  • Report  for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item

    Dear Experts,
    Is there any standard tcode for bom wise target and actual cost as well as qty at line item level for the month.
    there is one tcode s_alr_87013127 but user has to double click in order to get line item details.
    I want to see line item wise breakup/bom wise target and cost cost as well as qty.
    Thanks in advance.
    regards
    RK

    Dear experts,
    I am still looking for a revert.
    regards
    RK

  • Actual Cost of finished goods in MIGO

    Hi,
    The value of Finished material in FI Document generated in MIGO takes the (Goods Receipt Quantity) X (Planned/Moving average Price from material master), Where as it should take the Total Actual Price calculated after Order Confirmation Based on Actual Material Purchase Price & Actual Activity Posting Value.
    For example:
    Present scenario
    Material-> MIGO QTY>Moving Avg Price -->MIGO FI Document Value
    Finished> 1000  EA> Rs. 10/ EA--
    >Rs. 10,000=00
    Required Scenario:
    MIGO FI Document value= (Purchase Value of Raw Material)+ ((Activity Posted while Confirmation)X(Activity price))
    Thanks.

    Hi,
    What u said is right Mr Kapil.. See when u do GR From Production Order System Calculate Moving Price or Planned Price from
    material Matser .
    As per ur Reuirement u told it should calculate (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD).
    it is possible only when order quantity is less , suppose say your order qty is 150 mt per day and your Plant capacity is 500mt
    per day production will be done in a half day, sale can be done on same day after Production with the formula what u told.
    If suppose say , Your order is 2000 ton of Oil , it will take u to complete 4 days for your Total production as you told, GR should
    be done on (Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD) formula, you dont know exact activity price for 2000 ton until u finish your total
    production, at the same time until u do GR sales cannot be done. So in SAP Gr is intially done on Moving Average Or Planned
    (Standard Price) , After totla Prodcution GR is Compared with Actual Cost(Raw Material Price + activity+OVHD)= :"Variance".
    Plus are MInus is Reduced or added to Finished Goods Account or PP account during Settlement.
    If any wrong Pls Correct me Experts,
    Pavan

  • Posting Actual Costs at Material Level

    Hi All
    For our standard costs we will have BOM Components, Activities from Routings and additive costs. We also have activated Material Ledger and will use it for Actual Costing, the objective being that each and every actual cost will be brought to the SKU level. For BOM components and activities that is no problem since it will be done through settlement.
    However for cost components that have additive costs how do we settle them to the material ledger? Do we need to do MR22 for difference between standard and actual? Is there a way to do this through a template allocation or some other allocation method?
    Thank you

    Hi
    Lets assume, you have Std cost of 100 USD involving Material + Labor and an additive cost of 10 USD entered manually from CK74N...
    During production order processing - You would issue material components and confirm Labor hrs... Say, this amounts to 120 USD as against the std cost of 100 USD...
    However, in prod orders, there will be nothing posted against the additive std cost of 10 USD... If you wish, you need to post it either through template allocation from some cost centers or use some assessment cycle or transfer manually from KB11N or use a costing sheet
    Regards
    Ajay M

  • Break Up of Actual Costs in a report for list of orders

    Hi All,
    SAP standard reports displays only the total planned & total actual costs.
    Is there any standard report available which can display break up of planned & actual costs along with total costs, for list of orders (e.g: time, material and external resources consumption).
    Thanks in advance
    JK

    hi
    you can find the material cost,external service etc in the standard cost report itself select the change layout and select the items you want to display ,you can get the result
    regards
    thyagarajan

  • PS (plan vs actual costs) Report

    Hi,
    I have to generate the above report. How can I diffrentiate between Plan cost and actual cost. Is there any business contect report for this ? can anybody throw light on this.
    Regards,
    Bill

    Hi Bill,
               There is no std content for this as far as I know , Not sure if your report is based on cost for a given version then its really a mystery . If you are looking to pull the cost for PS then check the table RPSCO in r3 , this is the PS cost table , and you can differentiate Plan/Actual based on the Field Value type .
    hope this helps ,

Maybe you are looking for