Alt bom components with ATP check - production order resets usage prob.

Hello,
I have searched many threads for this answer. Here is my scenario
BOM for finished good X has the following components
Component   |    Usage Prob   |    Strategy    | Alt Item Group   |   Priority
A          |             55%         |         2         |         1             |              1
B          |              45%        |         2         |          1            |               2
When I create the production order for 100 units, components A and B are proposed respectively (per usage probability, as expected)   - like so
Production Order
Component A = 55 units
Component B = 45 units
Here is the requirement - Component B at any given time is restricted by federal law to not be used for material X for more than 45% of its make up. Therefore my client cannot build X with more than 45% of component B. However, we always want to use at most 45%. IF component B is not available, transfer all or partial confirmation to Component A.
Issue:
ATP and usage probabilities will not work. Whenever I run ATP check for production order, the component with the highest priority get all the reqirements (if inventory permits). The production order master data is 'reset' by the ATP check (the usage probability on the component will change from 45% to 100%)
Any help is greatly appreciated!
~S
Edited by: futsol on Jun 29, 2009 10:41 PM

futsol ,
Maintainance is not required, it say manual maintainance is possible if required.
if you set it 1 system will check the proportion and do the reservation accordingly , if even in production order if you check availabity it will not change the quantity proportion, if its 2 , its meant for alloting the 100 % available component.if A is not 100% available it will replace it with B , if B is availabe to cover total quantity and vice versa.
by giving 1 it gives you option to change proportion as per your wish , if the any of the alternative is not available to fullfill rerquirement., for example in your case component B , if its available you want to use it 45% all the time , but if its not availabe the you can change the proportion or quantity for A in that specific production order only.
I dont know if there is any other way.
Check again with strategy 1 .
Hope it helps you .
Regards
Ritesh

Similar Messages

Date of BOM Explosion/Routing in the production order

Dear gurus,
i would like have the Date of BOM Explosion/Routing in the production order same the "Basic start date" .
I setting the value 1 = Basic start DATE in the customizing transaction OPPQ and OPPR but the system calculate this date wrong.
Are the the other setting for this necessity ?
Thanks a lot
Daniele
PP TEAM

Dear Toto,
The standard procedure is that the system first checks whether a BOM explosion number exists for the BOM. If one does exist,
the BOM is exploded using the fixed key date contained in the BOM explosion number. If a BOM explosion number does not exist,
the BOM is exploded with the order start date.
Check the setting in OPPQ for BOM explosion.
Regards
S Mangalraj

Automise CS61 BOM creation with reference to Sales order

Hi Experts.
Need your help in fixing one scenario:
We have scenarion data coming from third party containing BOM data with respect to Sales order.
We are using XI/PI,
1: Do we have any idoc for CS61 master creation. (Not likely to move in bdc ....etc)
2: How to Create multilevel in that....
Please guide .. Help is appreciable.
Regards
Deepak Sodhi

Hi,
You will need to make assignment from So item to Delivery item please check if copy control is maintained at item level. Also make sure that Copy controls are maintianed for the billing document from the SO & Delivery both as this would be the next step.

Assembly to order: change in sales order with change in Production order

I want to activate change in the sales order data when a production order(which is created w.r.t the sales order) data is changed (Strategy 82 used); I have de-activated "No Update" for the corresponding requirement class 201; also the material for which SO created ,is not a part of any Delivery group.
But when I am changing the production order (date/qty.), SO isn't getting updated accoringly.
Please tell me the reason why it isn't happening!!

Hi
The sales order requirement can be made as the production order receipt once you save the order in the system.
so it is possible to change the receipt according to the sales order reqmt if any changes made in the sales order,
in every entry or changes in the sales order ( if you use the stategy 82) . in back end system explode the BOM and the create the production order as per the order reqmt,
even while you do the changes mad in the sales and save that time sytem re explode the BOM once again and change the production order qty.
but if you change the production order , system not re run or explode the BOM , Routing . such setting is not made in the system . so obviously updation will not happen for the sales order .
Edited by: raj on Jun 9, 2009 11:22 AM

Post GM with reference to Production Order using BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE

Hi Experts,
We need to post Goods Movement with reference to Production order. In brief, we have to get the functionality of MB1A done. I'm trying to use BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE, but its not reflecting the Documented Goods Movements in the Production Order.
Here is the data i'm using:
goodsmvt_header : posting date, document date
goodsmvt_code : 03
goodsmvt_item:
material
plant
storage loc
batch
mov typ : 261
ENTRY_QNT
ENTRY_UOM
ENTRY_UOM_ISO
order id
Sometimes it generates material doc and year in exporting parameter, and sometimes it gives message "Content of order zzzzzzz : yyyyyyy transferred to interface (IMSEG): xxxxxxx".
But despite of this I cannot see the Documented Goods Movements reflecting in the Production Order.
Can anyone help on this. Is there anything else to be passed or I'm missing any process ?

Experts,
I could get the postings done with BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE. I was executing BAPI_GOODSMVT_CREATE and then BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT separately, thus the generated Material doc number was not getting posted. When I used the Test Sequence option from SE37 menu, it worked.

User Exit for CO01/CO02 : How to check production order before saving ?

Hi all,
I try to check production order before saving.
if AFPO-LGORT or RESB-LGORT or some other field is initial, throw an error msg and stop saving process.
I try using badi WORKORDER_UPDATE and user exit PPCO0001 EXIT_SAPLCOBT_001, find out that i can check the data but can't stop the saving process.
Anyone knows some other user exits can do this?
Thanks a lot.

Solved.
A wired solution from
http://abaplog.wordpress.com/2007/03/01/reading-other-programs-data-using-field-symbols-in-abap/

Problem with ATP check in release of process order

Hi gurus,
I have next problem in automatic release of process order:
No checking group is maintained for product 000000000791104015, plant VFMX in matl master.
Situation:
I've some materials without MRP views in material master data but apparently this doesn't affect to release order. In this case, this material hasn't this views and it's impossible to release the order. I'm supposing the problem is not related with the fill up of this views or the field in material master data, because for other materials with the same situation the release is running.
Anybody has any idea?
Thanks a lot,
Regards

Dear ,
You are facing this error because :
- you have activated avaialbility check, but checkingb group is not maintained in material master of the component
- if maintained in material master, in configuraion checking group and checking rule combination is not maintained
- if above both are maintained then in the checking control for the order type is maintained, but in the control you maintained the setting that - release not possible if no availability, hence change it to user control option.
*So Goto MM02- material master -MRP3 view -Maintain the Availability check field as 01/02 as applicable for components in the production *
For more clarification , you can investigate the below : For production order avilablity check and release u have should following settings.
1. Define checking Group - SPRO
2. Define checking Rule- SPRO.
3. Define scope of check - OPJJ - Scope of the avilabilty check is defined for the Combination of Checking group and Checking rule. Check contol is defined for each comination of checking group and checking rule.
4.Define Chek control -OPJK : Checking rule is linked to Ordertype/Plant combination.
while releasing the production order system will do avilability check as per the settings In OPJK for ordertype/plant combination.
Hope this is clear to you
Regards
JH
Edited by: Jiaul Haque on Jun 20, 2010 9:20 AM

ATP Error-production order details is not appearing in ATP check

Hi ,
As per the details which I updated, production order details are not appearing in Sales order ATP check.
Pls help me to solve it ,the settings needed to do in the system.
Thanks,
Vijesh

Hi,
i checked the configuration, it is same as you said, but still the production order window is not showing in the ATP check.
thanks to help.
Regards,
Vijesh

Can we reverse the status of the planned/prod order with ATP check

Dear all,
i ahve 1 query. When in the product view, if u select any planned order/prod order, and click on ATP check.
if the quantity is confiremd, then the stutus of the orde change to checked and confirmed.
i want to know can we change this status. can we reverse this status.??
let me know ASAP. if yes plz explain in deatils
Regards
Pravin Mukkawar

hi Praveen
You can reverse/change the status of a Planned Order if it shows "checked and fully confirmed/partially confirmed" in
/sapapo/rrp4( process receipts).
To do this, enter your location product and run the transaction. be sure you are in change mode.you will get a list of planned orders.select your planned order and select the "pegging structue conversion" push button. then in the next screen select the valid line and push the "delete ATP status" button.
refresh product view and you can see the new status "Not Checked" for your product.
Hope this helps you.
Regards
Mohan V R Chunchu

Aligning alerts with atp check

Dear SDN
Is there a possibility to configure the "scope of check" for alerts? For example: I would like to check the situation for a planned or process order and if the components are available, using the alert monitor from the ppds planning board. I will not have the system should consider purchase requisitions as a reciept as they are very unreliable, and the same with planned orders for components. I want an alert if there are (no stock) and no purchase orders / production orders. In principle, we want the alerts to be generated according to the ATP check that we have setup. Is that possible?.
Thanks in advance / Ann

You can use standard ATP alert monitor.
It is set up in /sapapo/amon1.
If you want to know more about ATP monitor see note 500051.
Best Regards

Change components and Routing of production order

Hi, experts, I have such requirement that change quantity of a component or add a component, add a operation into current routing.
I have look up answer, but can not find the right one.
BAPI_PRODORD_CHANGE only can change header data.
BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN seems can not change production orders, it is for service orders.
CO_XT_ORDER_CHANGE will assign a new routing number and a new bom number.
Could somebody give me some FM and BAPI for reference? Thanks in advance.

Hi Rick,
Follow the below sample steps for changing component quantity:
DATA:
    l_methods TYPE bapi_alm_order_method,
    it_boperations TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapi_alm_order_operation_e WITH HEADER LINE,
    it_components TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapi_alm_order_component_e WITH HEADER LINE,
    it_components1 TYPE STANDARD TABLE OF bapi_alm_order_component WITH HEADER LINE.
1. Call BAPI :BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL , it will give existing order component details.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_GET_DETAIL'
    EXPORTING
      number        = <production order number>
    TABLES
      et_operations = it_boperations
      et_components = it_components
      return        = it_bapiret2.
2. Move it_components to components table compatibel to BAPI "BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN".
LOOP AT it_components.
MOVE-CORRESPONDING it_components TO it_components1.
_*"Note here while moving change the component quantity"*_
APPEND it_components1.
CLEAR it_components1.
ENDLOOP.
3. Build the methods table for change production order :
it_methods-refnumber = v_refnumber.
            it_methods-objecttype = 'COMPONENT'.
            it_methods-method = 'CHANGE'.
            it_methods-objectkey = v_objectkey.
            APPEND it_methods.
"Note v_refnumber has 1 to 1 relation ship with the components table, if you want to change First component in it_components1 then you have to enter value '1' here for v_refnumber.
it_methods-method = 'SAVE'.
        APPEND it_methods.
4 . Call
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_ALM_ORDER_MAINTAIN'
          TABLES
            it_methods   = it_methods
            it_component = it_components1
            return       = it_bapiret2.
CALL FUNCTION 'BAPI_TRANSACTION_COMMIT'.

Assemble-to-order with spliting the Production Order

Hello,
I'm new to SAP and we just implemented the SAP System.
My Experince is from one year as Process Owner for PP in our Project.
I have a specific Question regarding the assemble to order process.
So far we did not implemet Capacity Planning in the System, but I would like to use it.
The Idea is the following:
1. There is a sales order coming for 1pc of Product. The scheduling is carried out, ATP-Check and so on. The production order is created and at least the capa is placed on the end of the chain (using quetimes). One Product needs 60min to assemble.
2. more orders are comeing in, all consuming 60min of capa on that day. If the capa is used, move to later date until capa is back again. this also should be now Problem to set as far as I understand what I have learned already
3. What i do not like... If I get orders with too many qty.... I would like to hav a maximum qty. where the order gets splited and moved forward to the next day... so... Customer orders 10, 5 are placed on Tuesday, 5 on wednesday and so on.
Each of those "Splits" should have one production order header.
Any idea how I can reach that?
Thanks, hope I will find a solution
BR Marian

Marian,
Standard ERP Sales order ATP cannot be made to confirm Sales orders based on capacity availability. All capacity related conflicts and resolutions are done during dispatching, which is a separate step.
If you need SO ATP to consider available capacity while confirming the Sales order, you could use functionality that exists in APO. Otherwise, in ERP, you are facing custom development.
Assemble to order in general is restrictive as to what types of scheduling can be permitted. There is no automatic production order splitting in standard SAP ATO. Some manual manipulation is permitted. Of course, with custom development, you are only limted by your imagination.
Best Regards,
DB49

ATP check at order level and delivery level

Hello SAP Gurus,
We are implementing ATP ( Available to promise ) check for the product lines of our client.
Client is asking for comparative benefits if we implement the check at order level or at delivery level . Which would be most beneficial .....activating check at Sales order level OR at delivery level?
Kindly help me by sharing your thoughts or any through any standard help available on SAP site.
Thanks and Regards,
Abhijeet

Its always better to have the best of both the worlds.
Have ATP both at order and delivery level. Its important at order level since you would like to give the customer a confirmed date and quantity when he places the order. It ensures that you do not over commit or under commit the customer.
ATP at delivery level is, i think, should be a must which would prevent creating ambiguous deliveries with huge quantities even if the stocks are not there and then getting stuck during goods issue. Also, it might happen that delivery is created lot later than when the SO gets created and in the meantime stock position might have got changed. A lot of rescheduling and manual backorder processing keeps happening and you can never be sure if a stock that was booked by a sales order would still be there with it.
Other ppl might have different views

ATP for production order

Hi Friends,
Need your help to figure out solution for an issue :
I need ability to substitute alternate component when we do ATP during release of a production order.
As far as I know, we can do this in 2 ways
1) Maintain alternate BOM with the substitute material
2) Use GATP production substitution procedures
Can you think of any other ways of doing this. I do not want to use GATP (within APO) and want to get this done in ECC itself.
Please suggest!!!

Thanks for the reply Suri.
I dont think I can use this as there will be multiple alternates for a product.
Did anybody use GATP for production orders, not CTP or MLATP but vanilla ATP and RBA. Please let me know what precautions should be taken and are there any considerations for using the functionality. I have used GATP for sales orders earlier but never for production orders, I assume functionality should be same except for the business even which would be PP.
Thanks and waiting for replies.
Prod_Planner

Alt BOM Selection at the time of order creation

Hi Friends,
For one of our FERT We Have 4 Alt BOMS and Fore Production Lines
My requirement here is while creating The Production Order In co01 I Need to select The Required Alt BOM. How to configure this spro
However the System Is asking for The Production Lines(as Pop UP Massage)
Suggestu2026u2026
Hari

Hi,
For that you need to maintain the production Version in material master MRP4 view in that maintain all your BOM and routing.
Then MRP4 view of material master there is option selection method here you need to select 3-Selection only by production version.
After that in OPL8 for your order type and plant maintain
Production version-1 Manual selection of production version
Please try and come back.
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Alt bom components with ATP check - production order resets usage prob.

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for