Applied patch 4505133 db still shows 10.1.0.4

Here are the results from EM GC when I applied the patch. Should my version show 10.1.0.5?
G:\oracle\product\10.1.0\oracle_home/EMStagedPatches/4505133 Silo-Dev.svc.nt.xx.xxSILODEV_Silo-Dev.svc.nt.ss.xx, DATAHAUS.SVC.NT.PITT.xx, chicago.svc.nt.ss.ssLISTENER_Silo-Dev.svc.nt.ss.ssSucceeded
Name Targets Status Started Ended Elapsed Time (seconds)
cachePatchFile
Succeeded Apr 20, 2006 10:08:11 AM GMT-04:00 Apr 20, 2006 10:17:04 AM GMT-04:00 533
checkTarget Silo-Dev.svc.nt.tt.edu Succeeded Apr 20, 2006 10:17:12 AM GMT-04:00 Apr 20, 2006 10:17:13 AM GMT-04:00 1
stagePatch Silo-Dev.svc.nt.tt.edu Succeeded Apr 20, 2006 10:17:16 AM GMT-04:00 Apr 20, 2006 10:19:40 AM GMT-04:00 144
expandPatch Silo-Dev.svc.nt.tt.edu Succeeded Apr 20, 2006 10:19:42 AM GMT-04:00 Apr 20, 2006 10:20:26 AM GMT-04:00 44
applyPatchWIN Silo-Dev.svc.nt.tt.edu Succeeded Apr 20, 2006 10:20:32 AM GMT-04:00 Apr 20, 2006 10:20:36 AM GMT-04:00 4
collectionStep Silo-Dev.svc.nt.tt.edu Succeeded Apr 20, 2006 10:20:36 AM GMT-04:00 Apr 20, 2006 10:24:01 AM GMT-04:00 205

Here is the output from v$version:
Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition
PL/SQL Release 10.1.0.4.0 - Production
CORE 10.1.0.4.0 Production
TNS for 32-bit Windows: Version 10.1.0.
NLSRTL Version 10.1.0.4.0 - Production
Seems that even though the applypatchWIN says succeeded, clicking on the hyperlink show that it failed. My opatch may need updated to the most recent version.

Similar Messages

Database still showing 9.2.0.5 after applying patch 4287598

Hi all,
I am upgrading the oracle Application 11.5.10 to 11.5.10.2. For this i am following the 11.5.10.2 Technology Stack Validation Patch readme.
As per the utility's output on database server node, I have applied the patch 4287598 to upgrade database version 9.2.0.5 to 9.2.0.6. But after applying the patch also database still showing 9.2.05.
How to get currect database version?
Please help.
Regards,

To upgrade the database to 9.2.0.6, you need to apply (Patch 3948480 - 9.2.0.6 PATCH SET FOR ORACLE DATABASE SERVER).

Security scans on DBMS server still show Java vulnerabilities after applying JavaVM Component patch 20233168

JavaVM Component patch 19618575 was applied to our Oracle 11.2.0.3 DBMS Windows 8 server and a security scan was done showing no vulnerabilities.
However, patch 19618575 was rolled back by Bundle Patch 34 (20227195) and Oracle released another JavaVM Component patch 20227195. We applied the new JavaVM patch successfully and the System Admin did the security scan which showed there was still a vulnerability for the JavaVM Component.
Is anyone else having this problem.

Richard,
I have just applied patch to upgrade from Portal 3.0.9 to 3.0.9.8.1 (Patch applied to loginserver and portal schema) and the External Applications that were previously set up have gone from the portlet.
Does this relate to your note at the bottom:
"Minor issues with Bulk action. 1840420 CUSTOM WRITTEN EXTERNAL AUTH MODULE NEED TO BE UPDATED AFTER 3.0.9 UPGRADE SSOXOID.PKB DOESN'T LOAD.
External authentication modules that were written before 3.0.9 need to be updated after upgrading to 3.0.9. ssoauthx.pks is updated in 3.0.9 and contains additional routines that need to be implemented." ??
If I go to the "Login Server Administration" portlet and select the link "Administer External Applications" I get a list of 5 External Applications that have previously been set up.
If I go back to the Home Page and select "customize" on the "External Applications" portlet I get the message "Your Login Server administrator has not registered any external applications".
Does that mean I should just run 'ssoauthx.pks' & 'ssoxoid.pkb' or do I need to do something else ??
Thanks
Simo

RH 11: Conditional Build tags applied: Content still showing up in search

Hello. I am generating WebHelp using conditional build tags using RH 11.
I have marked books in the TOC with a CBT of Not in 6.1.
I generated help and excluded content marked with the CBT Not in 6.1.
When the Web Help is generated, the books marked with the CBT do not display in the TOC. However, if I do a search, topics that are under the books and therefore should not be included in the output have search results returned.
Is there a scenario in which topics that have been excluded from the generated help would still show up in search?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Jenny

Hi Jenny
Indeed there are a few reasons this may happen.
First, simply excluding a topic or a book in the TOC simply makes sure that the TOC doesn't have a link pointing to the topic. Normally, I'll just tag the topic itself and ignore tagging the TOC. If a topic has been excluded, it won't appear in the TOC.
In the WebHelp SSL recipe, click to expand the Content Categories section and look at the settings on the right. You might try ensuring the following option is enabled. It's named Exclude Unreferenced Topics from Output. As long as nothing else is linking to the topic, ensuring it is removed from the TOC *SHOULD* cause it to no longer be included.
Cheers... Rick

ACS 5.3 applying patch

Hello,
I have problem with applying patch on ACS 5.3. In release notes there is mentioned following command format:
acs patch install patch-name.tar.gpg repository repository-name
The problem is ACS 5.3 does't have this command syntax.
It does't have acs command.
Here is what i have trued:
acs/admin# patch install 5-3-0-40-1.tar.gpg rep
Do you want to save the current configuration ? (yes/no) [yes] ?
Generating configuration...
Saved the running configuration to startup successfully
% Manifest file not found in the bundle
repository rep
url ftp://172.30.5.217
user user password hash c7b11123e528660abea78d974339875394fbb234
Here is supported command that i found on ACS 5.3.
acs/admin# ?
Exec commands:
application Application Install and Administration
backup       Backup system
backup-logs Backup system and application logs
clock        Set the system clock
configure    Enter configuration mode
copy         Copy commands
debug        Debugging functions (see also 'undebug')
delete       Delete a file
dir          List files on local filesystem
exit         Exit from the EXEC
forceout     Force Logout all the sessions of a specific system user
halt         Shutdown the system
mkdir        Create new directory
nslookup     DNS lookup for an IP address or hostname
patch        Install System or Application Patch
ping         Ping a remote ip address
reload       Reboot the system
restore      Restore system
rmdir        Remove existing directory
show         Show running system information
ssh          SSH to a remote ip address
tech         TAC commands
telnet       Telnet to a remote ip address
terminal     Set terminal line parameters
traceroute   Trace the route to a remote ip address
undebug      Disable debugging functions (see also 'debug')
write        Write running system information
acs/admin#

Hi,
I find this odd, can you run a "show application"
Here is the output of my ACS -
Version information of installed applications
Cisco ACS VERSION INFORMATION
Version : 5.3.0.40.4
Internal Build ID : B.839.EVAL
Patches :
5-3-0-40-2
5-3-0-40-4
gdtsrv-acs5/admin# ?
Exec commands:
acs          ACS control commands
acs-config   ACS config mode
application Application Install and Administration
backup       Backup system
backup-logs Backup system and application logs
clock        Set the system clock
configure    Enter configuration mode
copy         Copy commands
debug        Debugging functions (see also 'undebug')
delete       Delete a file
dir          List files on local filesystem
exit         Exit from the EXEC
forceout     Force Logout all the sessions of a specific system user
halt         Shutdown the system
mkdir        Create new directory
nslookup     DNS lookup for an IP address or hostname
patch        Install System or Application Patch
ping         Ping a remote ip address
reload       Reboot the system
restore      Restore system
rmdir        Remove existing directory
show         Show running system information
ssh          SSH to a remote ip address
tech         TAC commands
telnet       Telnet to a remote ip address
terminal     Set terminal line parameters
traceroute   Trace the route to a remote ip address
undebug      Disable debugging functions (see also 'debug')
write        Write running system information
Tarik Admani
*Please rate helpful posts*

Error while applying patch for SOA suite 10.1.3.4 on Weblogic 9.2 - URGENT

Hi All,
I am trying to apply a weblogic patch on SOA server but facing an error while applying the Opatch . I checked the accessibilty to opatch inventory by using the command % opatch lsinventory . This executed fine and there were no errors. But when I try applying the opatch I get the error -that some jars missing . Even if I replace the jars and try executing opatch again I face the same error . I googled a lot but couldnt find any solution . Please let me what can be done for solving this error .
D:\7337034>opatch apply -oh D:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1
Oracle Interim Patch Installer version 1.0.0.0.61
Copyright (c) 2009 Oracle Corporation. All Rights Reserved..
Oracle recommends you to use the latest OPatch version
and read the OPatch documentation available in the OPatch/docs
directory for usage. For information about the latest OPatch and
other support-related issues, refer to document ID 293369.1
available on My Oracle Support (https://myoraclesupport.oracle.com)
Oracle Home : D:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1
Oracle Home Inventory : D:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1\inventory
Central Inventory : C:\Program Files\oracle\inventory
from : N/A
OUI location : D:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1\oui
OUI shared library : D:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1\oui\lib\win32\oraInstalle
r.dll
Java location : "D:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1\jdk\jre\bin\java.exe"
Log file location : D:\product\10.1.3.1\OracleAS_1/.patch_storage/<patch ID>
/*.log
Creating log file "D:\product\10.1.3.1\oracleas_1\.patch_storage\7337034\Apply_7
337034_06-02-2009_13-39-26.log"
Provide your email address to be informed of security issues, install and
initiate Oracle Configuration Manager. Easier for you if you use your My
Oracle Support Email address/User Name.
Visit http://www.oracle.com/support/policies.html for details.
Email address/User Name: [email protected]
Provide your My Oracle Support password to receive security updates via your My
Oracle Support account.
Password (optional):
Password (optional):
Unable to establish a network connection to Oracle. If your systems require a
proxy server for outbound Internet connections, enter the proxy server details
in this format:
[<proxy-user>@]<proxy-host>[:<proxy-port>]
If you want to remain uninformed of critical security issues in your
configuration, enter NONE
Proxy specification: NONE
** Installing base package **
Deploying core - Version 10.3.1.0.0
Deploying engines - Version 10.2.7.1.0
Deploying metricdata - Version 10.2.4.0.3
Deploying scripts - Version 10.3.1.0.0
Oracle Configuration Manager has been configured in disconnected mode. If the
target ORACLE_HOME is running a database, please refer to the
"Post-installation Database Configuration" section of the OCM Installation
and Administration Guide
(http://www.oracle.com/technology/documentation/ocm.html) to complete the
installation.
View configuration data reports and access valuable configuration best
practices by going to My Oracle Support.
Backing up comps.xml ...
OPatch detected non-cluster Oracle Home from the inventory and will patch the lo
cal system only.
Please shut down Oracle instances running out of this ORACLE_HOME
(Oracle Home = d:\product\10.1.3.1\oracleas_1)
Is this system ready for updating?
Please respond Y|N >
y
Applying patch 7337034...
Patching jar files...
OPatch encounters the following issues during file patching:
The following java archives on Windows had problems with being patched:
1. orabpel.jar
[ object: DomainFilter.class ]
2. orabpel.jar
[ object: AdapterFrameworkListenerImpl$RoutingRuleXPathInfo.class ]
3. D:\product\10.1.3.1\oracleas_1\integration\esb\lib\orabpel.jar
[ No java archive file found. ]
4. orabpel.jar
[ Couldn't make backup copy of file. ]
5. D:\product\10.1.3.1\oracleas_1\integration\esb\lib\orabpel.jar
[ No java archive file found. ]
6. orabpel.jar
[ Couldn't make backup copy of file. ]
7. D:\product\10.1.3.1\oracleas_1\integration\esb\lib\orabpel.jar
[ No java archive file found. ]
8. D:\product\10.1.3.1\oracleas_1\integration\esb\lib\orabpel.jar
[ No java archive file found. ]
9. orabpel.jar
[ Couldn't make backup copy of file. ]
Replying 'Y' will terminate the patch installation immediately. It WILL NOT rest
ore any updates that have been performed to this point. It WILL NOT update the i
nventory.
Replying 'N' will update the inventory showing the patch has been applied.
NOTE: After replying either 'Y' or 'N' it is critical to review:
My Oracle Support Note 312767.1 How to rollback a failed Interim patch ins
tallation.
Do you want to STOP?
Please respond Y|N >
y
File Patching Error!
ERROR: OPatch failed during patching, possibly due to missing files.
OPatch returns with error code = 200

Hi , I am facing the same issue.
were you able to resolve it.
please let me know if you were.
Many Thanks.

I am using Acrobat XI Pro and tried to install the current update. I got this error message: "Error 1328.Error applying patch to file C:\Config.Msi\pT64b3.tmp It has probably been updated by other means1 and can no longer be modified by this patch. For mo

I am using Acrobat XI Pro and tried to install the current update. I got this error message: "Error 1328.Error applying patch to file C:\Config.Msi\pT64b3.tmp It has probably been updated by other means1 and can no longer be modified by this patch. For more information contact your patch vendor." tried uninstalling and reinstalling and still get the error. Searched for C:\Config.Msi\pT64b3.tmp and cannot find the path or the file

For AA XI, you only need the 11.0.09 patch. Download from http://www.adobe.com/support/downloads/product.jsp?product=1&platform=Windows (Use "MAC" if a MAC is used).

I am having error message of "firefox has stopped working".i unstill and delete folder in my directory adn i again reinstall but its still showing same error

I having the error message of "Firefox has Stopped working" and having following problems list out in the problem list text area is
Problem signature:
Problem Event Name: APPCRASH
Application Name: firefox.exe
Application Version: 20.0.1.4847
Application Timestamp: 51650aee
Fault Module Name: KERNELBASE.dll
Fault Module Version: 6.1.7600.16385
Fault Module Timestamp: 4a5bdaae
Exception Code: c0000005
Exception Offset: 00007b69
OS Version: 6.1.7600.2.0.0.256.1
Locale ID: 16393
Additional Information 1: 59d2
Additional Information 2: 59d28f4851ee3e61e3aa57edc696ac9e
Additional Information 3: 38b6
Additional Information 4: 38b6ae8359371108855a2a4e84f0ea47
Read our privacy statement online:
http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?linkid=104288&clcid=0x0409
If the online privacy statement is not available, please read our privacy statement offline:
C:\Windows\system32\en-US\erofflps.txt
i uninstall and delete the mozilla firfox in my directory and reinstall tha lastest version but its still showing the same error message.

i experienced the same problem. this is what i did:
*right click firefox
*click properties
*click compatibility tab
* check "Run this program in compatability mode for:"
* on dropdown choose Windows 7.
* click ok or apply.
this solution solved my problem.i hope it will work on yours too.

1328 Error applying patch to [filename].

A file has changed or is missing. Uninstall and reinstall the program.
I have tried this solution twice and it did not resolve the issue.

Anand8502
Hi,
I have tried all of your suggestions but I still have the issue with Error 1328 and the following message:
“Error applying patch to file D:\Config.Msi\PT78AF.tmp. It has probably been updated by other means and no longer can it be modified by this patch”. The Patch seems to update other files successfully, so is this an issue if this does not update this file and as previously stated I cannot find the file that it refers to on either drives (C:\ or D:\).
Cheers
Gary2105

ITunes match turned off on iPhone4s but still showing a "cloud" icon

I have signed up to iTunes Match and uploaded my entire music collection to the service.
I have turned this functionality off in my iPhone 4s so that all music that appears on this device, should be music that is physically stored on the device.
However, next to some albums/artists, a "cloud" icon is still showing.
My first question is, what does this icon mean?
Secondly, I cannot understand why this icon appears to some content and not others (see below).
Again, all my music I have matched or uploaded to the "cloud" via iTunes Match (Windows) but with Match turned off, the icon is still appearing for some reason and only next to some content not all.
Interestingly, no cloud icon whatsoever shows next to any individual song (under the "Songs" tab) regardless of what shows under "Albums" or "Artists" tabs:
I am at a complete loss.
I have turned iTunes Match on then off on the iPhone4s to try and correct the issue but no joy.
Can anyone help?

londonman2 wrote:
Hi Michael,
Though I've solved that particular problem there's still two issues with regard iTunes Match.
Number one, I'm genuinely worried about switching it on again on my iPhone. As soon as you enable it it threatens to 'replace' the music that is already on the phone and that to me is where things start to go wrong.
You're not the only person to be concerned by that alert dialog. As long as the songs that are already on your iPhone are in the cloud they will not actually be removed. They will remain on the iPhone.
londonman2 wrote:
Secondly, on my phone currently I have just 120 songs all of which 'exist' on the phone with 'Manually manage music and video's' AND 'Sync only checked songs and videos' as my iTunes set up under options...
With iTunes Match enabled on your iPhone, those settings no longer apply. Direct syncing of music via USB or Wi Fi is disabled and all music management will take place on the iPhone.
londonman2 wrote:
However, if you look at the attached screen shot the unticked songs are still appearing in the list but I have deleted these from the phone. These were the leftovers of my last iTunes Match download across a 3G network last week and won't disappear from the list even though they're unchecked.
What version of iOS is on your iPhone? This was a pretty serious bug in iOS 5.0.1, which was fixed in 5.1. But for some people, me included, it required restoring the iOS device to factory, then restoring the backup before the "ghost tracks" would go away.

Lync User Phone Number Changed in AD - Still Showing Old (Normalized) Number Days Later in Lync Client Contact Detail

Environment: Lync 2013 backend; Lync 2010 and Lync 2013 clients. Enterprise Voice not implemented. November 2013 CU Applied on Server.
Issue: Lync user (User A) phone number changed in AD but still showing old number for others days later.
Believed Cause: User A has not logged into Lync since change to republish new phone number?
So after reading this http://masteringlync.com/ I am beginning to think that something I perceived as an issue may actually be by design?
Action:
User A work phone number changed in AD. User A has only one phone entry in AD. Normalization rule in place to basically leave number unchanged (working)
Result:
New phone number propogated fine to Exchange/Outlook fine. Old number displaying only in Lync client when viewing User A contact card detail
Lync 2010 Client displays only old number when looking at Client A contact detail (this client only presents phone numbers if they are actually normalized)
Lync 2013 Client displays two work numbers.
One that we identify as a "display number" just as entered in AD - this shows correctly as the new number. Another that we identify as the "normalized number" which is still the old
number (same as 2010 Client)
Same results whether contact is saved in Lync Client or not and is not related to Outlook contacts - in fact one test was with a Lync account that is not Mail Enabled.
I did a dbanalyze to view the SQL database detail for User A and see that Category 'userInformation' has the old phone number and the time stamp on it seems to coincide with a Lync Cllient database change (user login or refresh on that end) so this seems
to futher confirm my findings thus my reaching the point of conceding it might be out of my control.
My Question I guess is ....
Have others discovered this? Is this a bug or do normalized phone numbers actually requre a client login to accept/republish the number correctly to others even though the information is updated in AD? User detail and how it propogates seems to
be the biggest mystery and it gets harder and harder to explain to users why changes aren't displaying accuralely.

Thanks Richard... your blog definitely hit home with what I was seeing but guess I just didn't want to accept that as the end of the road on this. I'm still in a little misbelief that client interaction is necessary to update a backend change.
This process really makes phone numbers in Lync an unreliable source given a user will never know if it is it up to date. And the problem with Lync 2013 client is it shows both numbers in the client ... the address book one with the
updated AD numbers and the one the normalized AD one that the user has to login to republish. I now more fully understand the process but trying to explain that to users when they see different work numbers .. ugh.
Oh well, guess the important part is to understand the process so thanks again.

Carrier sign still showing after wiping and reloading OS?

Hello dear users, In my thread of "application installation issues", it seems to be determined that my carrier who I got the phone from, is blocking the install of applications as I get a 910 error, application authorization failure, when i try to install an application from: www.blackberry.com/screenreader/ After some searching, I've come across BBSAK, which I use to wipe the phone and reload the oS. I've also come across the tool "vendelete" which deletes the vendor.xml files. So I do the following: 1. uninstall the original carrier OS from pc. 2. Install OS from different carrier to pc. 3. Use vendelete to get rid of the xml files which it says no xml files were found. 4. Use bbsak to wipe the oS. 5. reload the OS. But when the phone boots up, it still shows the sign of the carrier which I don't want, so i presume nothing has been updated? since when I try to install the application again, I still get the 910 error. What am i doing wrong here? Help would be much appreciated. Regards,
Solved!
Go to Solution.

Pith wrote:
Hello,
Ok, is there anything else that is not being wiped apart from the splash screen?
I mean anything else that would be the cause for not being able to get passed the 910 error? apart from the IT policy which was mentioned.
Actually, the IT Policy is another thing that is not removed by other Wipe methods, nor is it removed when you install a different carriers OS to the BB. See this for the proper IT Policy removal process:
KB18998 How to reset the BlackBerry smartphone to factory defaults
If, when you do this, you take a backup first, then you MUST NOT do a wholesale restore afterwards...if you do, the IT Policy will dutifully be put back on. You must do a selective restore of only those specific databases that you require, being 100% certain to EXCLUDE from the restore any that deal with the IT Policy:
KB03974 BlackBerry smartphone database list
Also, see this for the official document from RIM regarding the 910 error.
KB12230 "Download Failed: 910 Application authorization failure" appears on the BlackBerry smartphone when installing an application
From all of your symptoms, a latent IT Policy on board the BB could be the root cause of everything, so I recommend you use the above methods and truly cleanse your BB of the IT Policy. I think I'd suggest the following steps, just to be sure that things are truly clean...also insert plenty of reboots of your PC...not just restarts, but full power down reboots. Also, it is advised that you be logged into the PC on an account with full admin rights. Further, under Vista/Win7, use the "Run As Administrator" option for everything.
1) Remove all device OS update packages from your PC (add/remove programs)
2) Cleanly uninstall the RIM Desktop Software:
KB02206 How to perform a clean uninstall of BlackBerry Desktop Software
Some have reported that manually cleansing the registry of all keys related to RIM, BB, and Puma to also be helpful
Others have reported the use of a registry cleansing tool to also be helpful
Still others have reported the use of your original PIM (e.g., Outlook, NOTES, etc.) installation CD, running the "repair" process, to be helpful in some situations
3) Get a fresh download of the RIM Desktop Software:
http://us.blackberry.com/apps-software/desktop/
4) Download (to your PC) a fresh copy of your currently installed (on your BB) device OS package from your carrier (if it's not the original carrier, then you know already to delete all copies of VENDOR.XML after installing to the PC):
http://na.blackberry.com/eng/support/downloads/download_sites.jsp
5) Install the Desktop Software to your PC
6) Install (also to your PC), the device OS package
7) If you need a backup from the BB, take a full one now:
KB23680 Backup BlackBerry smartphone data using BlackBerry Desktop Software 6.0 to 7.0
8) Perform the ResetToFactory
KB18998 How to reset the BlackBerry smartphone to factory defaults
9) If you want a different OS on the BB, then remove the OS Package from your PC and install the one you desire onto your PC (but not yet to your BB)...again, remove VENDOR.XML files if the package is not from the BB's original carrier.
10) Use BBSAK to wipe the BB and then load the OS to the BB
11) If you took the backup in step 7, use that as source for a selective restore, including only the databases you require and excluding all databases that have anything to do with the IT Policy:
KB10339 How to use BlackBerry Desktop Software to restore data to a BlackBerry smartphone from a backup
12) Now see if you can proceed with installing apps
Good luck and let us know!
Occam's Razor nearly always applies when troubleshooting technology issues!
If anyone has been helpful to you, please show your appreciation by clicking the button inside of their post. Please click here and read, along with the threads to which it links, for helpful information to guide you as you proceed. I always recommend that you treat your BlackBerry like any other computing device, including using a regular backup schedule...click here for an article with instructions.
Join our BBM Channels
BSCF General Channel
PIN: C0001B7B4 Display/Scan Bar Code
Knowledge Base Updates
PIN: C0005A9AA Display/Scan Bar Code

My query is not executing properly after applying patches(bi.7

iam working bi.7 support package 13
after applying patches
my query is not executing properly in production my problem with FI queries
the query is executing properly but ihav created newformula using formulavariable that fields are not getting data in report if i click on currency conversion iam getting popup but currency translation coversion list is not coming and currency type(target currency also not dispalying)
but if i execute same query in development its working properly newformula fields are getting data and currency conversion also working in development
can u please help me in this issure
i hope as soon i will get solutions from bw gurus

That currency conversion problem is solved
i checked TCODE:RSCUR IN PRD its not showing any details
again i checked in dev and moved all currency types dev to production
now its wokring
i hope check with this it will work

Problems after applying patch 5 of CM & Collaboration on EP 6.0 SP2

hi everyone.
here is the problem
we recently applied patch 5 for CM on EP 6.0 SP2
the portal platform is at patch 27.
after having applied the patch the logs indicated that the upgrade sequence completed successfully.
however after we restarted the portal and logged back in none of the KM repositories are accessible. it just says not found / is not accessible or is not available.
under system admin when we go into Content Management Configuration it says invalid Repository Managers.
i have reset the SAPWCM user password and check the connection pool settings but still nuthin.
i have checked the cm.properties and config_local.properties files. however i have no document to compare what the correct format of the entries in these files is. i know they are supposed to have identical entries.
can somebody help?
thanks

Hi,
I had the same problems after patching CM. I had to re-enter the WCM password of the 3 CM Conenction Pools in the CM Configuration under "jdbc connection pools".
Hope this helps
Cheers,
Jochen

Installed Sharepoint 2010 Server SP2 Update; PSConfig succeeds but CA still shows "Upgrade Available"

I have installed SharePoint 2010 Server SP2. Central Administration shows the configuration database is at 14.0.7015.1000. I had to run PSConfig several times before it completed successfully due to missing features, setup files, etc. But
I got those cleaned up and finally got PSConfig to complete.
However, when I go to Farm Information it still shows "Upgrade Available" for the single WFE server we have.
When I run stsadm.exe -o localupgradestatus it shows me the following:
[2] content database(s) encountered.
[0] content database(s) still need upgrade or cannot be upgraded.
[23] site collection(s) are contained in the content databases.
[0] site collection(s) still need upgrade.
[53] other objects encountered, [12] of them still need upgrade or cannot be upgraded.
The 12 objects that cannot be upgraded are ancillary databases like:
StateService_[GUID]
Secure_Store_Service_DB_[GUID]
PerformancePoint Service Application_[GUID]
They all show "Cannot Upgrade" for the status.
Am I correct in thinking these are what's keeping the status at Upgrade Available? And if so how can I resolve?
If not, what else can be done to change that Upgrade Available status?
My goal is to get SP2 and the latest CU applied before trying to reinstall the User Profile Service.
Thank you.

use psconfig via command line:
> PSCONFIG.EXE -cmd upgrade -inplace b2b -wait
Scott Brickey
MCTS, MCPD, MCITP
www.sbrickey.com
Strategic Data Systems - for all your SharePoint needs

Applied patch 4505133 db still shows 10.1.0.4

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for