ATP Check Requirement

Hi Folks,
I am working on ATP check logic my logic is based on 3 things; Safety Stock, Lead Time, Confirmed PO qty (Include Shipping Notification)
I have 2 issues, one is related to Safety Stock and second one is related to Tcode Z9R2.
Safety Stock : For example, I have 100 qty of Safety Stock. When I create sales order for 60 qty it give the confirmation on the basis of Safety stock. Which is perfectly fine. When I creat the second sales order for 50 Qty it again confirms me on the basis of safety stock where as it should confirm 40 qty on the basis of Safety Stock (because 60qty is already reserved/blocked in first order)and 10 Qty on the basis of lead time. what could be the reason behind this.
Z9R2: After creating order when I try to see in Z9R2 Tcode I am unable to see the order which I created ..........I am able to see the stock and Purchase order if any created but I can not see the Sales Order. What is the reason behind this.
Your quick response would be highly appreciated.
Thanks,
Nihar

Hi Chidambaram,
Thanks for your response. But I would like ot know when I have safety stock of 100, when I create a order for 60 Qty and second order for 50 Qrty, why it is confirming the second order as per safty stock where as it has only 40 qty left out Why the safety order qty is not consumed when I create sales order.

Similar Messages

I want to know about ATP check requirement .generally we assigned yes or no while creating sales order

I want to know about ATP check requirement .generally we assigned yes or no while creating sales order what it means when we give Yes or No. how pegging flows
Regards
virender

Virender,
Can you be a bit more specific about ".....generally we assigned yes or no while creating sales order....." Exactly what field(s) did you 'assign'? Screenshots would be helpful.
With respect to pegging; in general, ATP has very little to do with pegging. Pegging is more of a planning concept, and not an 'availability checking' concept. There are a few exceptions in APO, but they are not commonly implemented.
Can you elaborate about exactly what you want to know with respect to 'pegging' and ATP?
Best Regards,
DB49

ATP check for materials and ATP Confirmed Qty's

Good morning,
I have a question regarding the ATP.
If I have a 100 of box a in stock and I have 2 Planned Orders for 75 (total req on box is 150).
When I convert the first Planned Ord to a Prodution Ord, the ATP check will run and confirm that I have the 75 boxes required (as we want it), but if I then convert the second Planned Order I would expect the ATP to say that only 25 is available, but it is also telling me that the 75 boxes required are available.
Can I set the ATP to confirm/allocate the first 75 boxes to the first Production Order and when the second order runs ATP to only commit to 25?
Thanks in advance.
ATP novice :o)

Hi Guy Hall,
Please check with, "include dependent reservation and production order" has been activated for checking rule used for production order at "avilabilty checking scope"
Regards
Pradeep

Re: ATP check at storage location level in sales order.

Hi ,
I have a requirement wherein storage location is determined in my sales order, the ATP check is done at plant level as well as storage location level , and the smaller of the two quantities is taken as the result of the ATP check.
My requirement is that the ATP check should only be performed at storage location level .
Please suggest if there is any standard setting available in SAP.
iF NO , PLEASE SUGGEST SUITABLE USER EXIT, WHERE I can add my requirement.
Regards,
Nilesh

Hi Nilesh,
in SAP standard the system is always checking on plant level first and then on the storage location level, there is no possibility to change this behaviour.
I'm also not sure if the process is correct, because if you have also requirements on plant level only then you would create negative ATP if you confirm on storage location level even though there is no ATP on plant level.
I'm also not aware of a user-exit that would suite your requirement, additionally according to the IMG documentation the user-exits in the availability check area should only be carried out in agreement with SAP.
Regards,
Markus

Relationship about ATP check and credit check

Dear all,
          At present, we have credit control in sales order. The rule is : once the sales order's amount over 1 dollar, the order will be blocked for credit check. This order has to release credit block manually in VKM4.
          Here has a problem, when a sales order has credit released with the status "D", if i check ATP for one item in this order, the credit status will return to "B", it is not match our requirement.
          How can the credit status not change when ATP check happen in the sales order?
         Thanks in advance!

Hi Irene,
You can copy this requirement with new code like :
IF yvbuk-cmgst = 'D'.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-SECURITY.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO BYPASS-USER3.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-STATIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DYNAMIC_LIMIT.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DOCUMENTVALUE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-CRITICAL_FIELDS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-REVIEWDATE.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OPEN_ITEMS.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-OLDEST_OP.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-DUNNING_LEVEL.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER1.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER2.
      MOVE CHARX TO status_reset-USER3.
    EXIT.
ENDIF.
If you are a problem with yvbuk-cmgst, you can use user exit MV45AFZZ to save the credit status (cmgst) into an other field.
This new field is checked in the new requirement.
This requirement deactivates the credit check if the credit status is released. In this case, no credit check is possible in SO.
Regards,
Lionel

Edit postDelete postReport this postReply with quote ATP check but the comm

hi , all guys :
when I create the pp-pi order , first i use the batch determination to allocate the component
batch , then i do the ATP check , but the committed quantity always is zero ,the ATP alway does
not support confirm quantity (co09 the confirm quantity always is zero),so when i create the other pp-pi order the stock quantity always cover the reqirements quantity of components
in the mater data , i use the ATP group is 02 (the customizing is standard) i think the ATP scope is irrelative to this issue .
in the order type control parameters , i use the ATP check
for example :
the componet 100-200 have three batchs :
batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
batch: 20100601 quantity 40 kg
now , the requirment of component 100-200 is 100 kg
the batch determination conditions is self expiration .
so i throght the batch determination and batch split to allocate the bacth and quantity is
batch: 20100501 quantity 30 kg
batch: 20100502 quantity 40 kg
batch: 20100601 quantity 30 kg
after allocating , i run the ATP check ,BUT the COMMITED QUANTITY ALWAYS IS ZERO .
I don't know why !!! ,where can configure the ATP confirm quantities (committed quantities) the in the customizing
can you give help me!!!
thanks!!!
best regards

Davis:
Check in MRP Group settings, Availability Check session, flag activate full confirmation logic. Test activate full confirmation logic.
Regards,
Ricardo

ATP check active when creating sales order - want to deactivate

Hello experts,
at the time we created a sales order, the checking group for availability check in the master data of an article was "02" (Individual requirements). However, this was a master data error, as the correct setting for this article is "KP" (No check). We have changed this setting in the article master, but now we have a problem with the delivery, as we can not confirm the required quantity in the desired date. The ATP check says we have no availability (based on the wrong master data existing during the creation of the order), but we need to override this check.
Is ther any way of "overriding" the ATP check of the article in our sales order, thus taking into account the "KP" (no check) setting?
Thank you very much in advance.
Kind regards.
Marcos

Have you actually created the delivery yet? If not, you can use the following path to deactivate the ATP check during delivery:
> SPRO
> Logistics Execution
    > Availability Check & Transfer of Requirements
      > Availability Check
        > Determine procedure for Each Delivery Item Category
Perhaps turning of the ATP check temporarily shall help overcome the issue.

Questions on ATP Check, RLT & Planning

Hi,
I have a couple of issues regarding ATP checks and Planning, and I was wondering if anyone could help.
1. We have a setup right now where we are using standard SAP availability check with Replenishment Lead time. In the Purchasing, we might have scenarios where some Purchase orders are indefintely delayed from the Vendors and this has to be reflected in the sales order.
We tried doing that by setting the delivery date in the PO to 31.12.9999 but since the date lies outside of the RLT, the sales order is fully confirmed and the delay in purchasing is not reflected in the sales order. Do you have any suggestions on how we could get around this without deactivating RLT?
2. We have a requirement right now of using the Planned delivery time in the Material master as working days instead of Calendar days for planning purposes. Any proposal on how that can be done?
3. We also have a requirement of taking the 'ordering calendar' into account for planning as well as for availability check - the ordering calendar is basically a weekly schedule when the POs are created and sent out to the Vendor. As an example we have a material with Planned delivery time as 3 days and GR Processing time as 1 day. However, we send the PO to this Vendor only on every Thursday.
When the sales order is placed on Friday, using RLT the Sales order will be confirmed for Tuesday next week, but the PO will not even be sent to the Vendor till Thursday next week and we end up giving incorrect confirmations to the customers. Is there any way that this 'ordering calendar' could be taken into account in the Availability check.
Hope someone can help.

Hi arnab
one way of achieving your requirements is
after creating the sales order you can execute the SALEs order MRP using MD50 transaction enter the order # and MRP control parameters 1,3,1,2. and execute.
Ensure the following before MRP.
1. All the master data are maintained for the schedule line creation for the components ( Source list, Scheduling agreements)
2. Material master with valid MRP data.strategy group having MTO strategy.
after sales order MRP you will get the schedule line created for the components
also MRp will create the cpacity requirements as we run the MRP with Lead time scheduling.
Hope this helps
SK
Reward your points

ATP check for inbound EDI order

Hi Friends,
When I am creating outbound sales order then ATP check is getting executed properly & multiple schedule lines are getting creating in IDOC also (depending on the avaibility of stock).
But When I am trying to create the inbound sales order via EDI/IDOC there is no ATP check performed & multiple schedule lines are not getting created in sales order(as per the avaibility of stock which I am checkin thro So09 tcode).
ANy1 has faced smilier problem in past. If yes then please let me know how to solve this problem of ATP check.
PLease let me know as soon as possible.
Many thanks in advance
Br, Prashant

HI Frndz,
problem is solved by using following customizing settings
Customizing:
SD/function/requirement availability/availability check/default (OVZJ)
Change the field "Rule availability" to the required value. You receive a list of the possible values using the possible entries pushbutton. Rescheduling is regarded as background processing. If you want to allow partial deliveries, choose the value 'E'.

ATP Check at Delivery Level instead of Sales Order

In Standard SAP, whenever a sales order is created the ATP check is done and a Goods movement 601 is done for it and gets blocked.
I want that no movement to be carried out at Sales Order Level and should get blocked only at the Delivery level, instead of Sales order.
Can i do this by not defining any movement type in the schedule line category attached to the Item category of the sales order.

hi amit,
u cannot remove MT assignment to SLCAT ,but what you can do is for your checking group and checking rule remove the ATP check relevancy in requirement class defination in spro customising >sd>availibility and TOR.
so that in VOV4 transaction for your SLCAT atp will be deactivated.
only while posting material doc at the time of PGI system would check for availibility and block the goods movement.
reward if helps !!!!!

ATP Check in Sales Order

I have the following problem:
I am working on a custom ATP check for the Internet Sales Order. I am looking for the user exit or maybe a place when the ATP check is triggered for both cases:
1 initial material is entered and is checked in which plant is available of the requested quantity by ATP check
2. when the delivery date (First Date) on the item level is changed to the future date.
any ideas are welcomed. will award points.
Edited by: Maksims Jegorovcevs on Feb 6, 2009 4:06 PM

Hi,
You can try the following user exits;
EXIT_SAPLATPC_001 - Processing Requirements Table Before Calling Actual Check
EXIT_SAPLATPC_002 - Processing Results of Actual Check
For your second question, when the delivery date of the line item is changed, the system itself will do automatic ATP check. Also in transaction OVZ2, for the checking group, you can use the field accumulation (value 3) for availability check with accumulation and confirmed quantities.
Regards,

Make-to-Order customer Return Order triggers unwanted ATP check

When executing a return delivery on a Make-to-Order (Strategy 20, no APO) material, we notice that the ATP check (checking rule BE) gets triggered. On a return this makes no sense and of course fails, stopping us from creating the delivery. How can we prevent that?
Strat. 20 has Req.type KE & Req.Class 040 with the Availability Check flagged, but returns should not trigger an ATP check and therefore the SLCat is unflagged as such ("Define Procedure for each schedule line category"), but that seems to be ignored - only for this MTO strategy.
When, for testing, we change the Strategy on the same material to 40, the ATP check -everything else being equal- no longer happens, which indicates that the Order type, Del Type, ItCat, SLCat are all ok. What link am I missing ?
Somehow, selecting a different material strategy impacts the running of ATP. It would already be useful to know, if in your system, when using Make-To-Order strategy, you see the same or not.
Help would be very appreciated.
Hans.

Thank you for the suggestion. OVZI already has these settings (MRP type and RqType blank).
I don't see how a setting in OVZI would explain that just changing the strategy on the material removes the problem : the key fields here (ItCat, MRPType) would have the same values and they would both come up with a requirement type, linked to a requirement class which has the AvC active (ovzg). How come that gets overruled (I presume by the schedule line category DN) for one strategy and not the other ?
I could make an entry in ovzi to force it to go to the same requirement type all the time, but that will impact all materials using this ItCat and MRP type. That seems like a too generic fix for a specific issue. If you know of any other link between strategy (specifically MTO) and ATP behaviour, I'd be very interested.

ATP check based on production finish date

Hi all,
customer order goods for the 02.06.09.
Transportation take 10 days so, by itinerary , I'll have the material avaiability date for the 15.05.2009.
All' it's OK.
Mrp planner , based on customer calendar, insert demand for customer date 02.06.09
We have insert 10 days on material master as Goods receipt processing time, this for anticipate the end of production 10 days before .
Now we need that atp check production order date not including the Good receipt processing time
Is it possible ?
Regards
Sil
When I do atp check by sales order , ato check see the 02.06.09 as avaiability date and not the desidered 15.05.09
Any idea about haw to realised atp check on

Hi,
This requirement can not be fulfilled by Standard SAP. But you can address this issue via Z development.
You need to maintain Z table with Customer and lead time. Write a BDC and run this BDC once sales order is created. So that system will change requirement date as per the Z table.
I hope this will resolve your issue.
Regards,
Shailendra

CRM 5.0 ATP check to ECC not including pick / pack time in ECC 6.0

Been searching SDN & OSS, our ATP check in 5.0 is reading the proper inventory in ECC but when no inventory is available the date being returned is the total replenishment leadtime in the ECC material master. (good)
When the order is entered in ECC if no stock exist, the total replenishment leadtime become the material availability date in the ECC schedule line, we have 2 days pick / pack time in the shipping point so the confirmed date is 2 factory days after the material availibility date.
Therefore in CRM the ATP date in CRM looks to be 2 days earlier than desired or what ECC provides. I also set up the vendor partner in CRM but that did not help.
Anyone have experience with this one?
One similiar topic, if total replenshiment leadtime is 3 days and saturday & sunday are not workdays. a CRM order placed on saturday gives wednesday (monday, tuesday, wednesday) as the date. ECC gives thursday (tuesday, wednesday, thursday)

I had 2 issues
- I didn't have the X set in SMOFPARSFA so i was doing availibility information which doesn't include scheduling (pick pack)
- other issue was timezones which required note 1423767

ATP Check on the basis of Acknowledged PO

Hi Friends,
I have a requirement where My client want the ATP check should be done on the basis of followings;
1. Saftey Stocks.
2. Acknowledged Purchase Order
3. Lead Time.
Safety Stock and Lead time is in SAP standard. My problem is Acknowledged Purchase Order..........earlier client was doing on the basis of PO issued. but not client wants to include the PO only when it'll be Acknowleded by the Vendor specifying the estimated date in the acknowledgement.
Share your expertise with me to fix this issue.
Thanks,
NR

Hi,
You can include Shipping notifications in the ATP and exclude the PO. But Order Acknowledgements are not available under the standard scope settings for Availability check.
Regards,
Kathir

ATP Check Requirement

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for