Automatic generation of integration models

For Automatic Generation of integration Model we referred SAP Help and have done the settings as per SAP help.
     T code: CFC9
     Material Master Change Transfer         2 (BTE Transfer, Immediately)
     T code: BF11
     Maintained
     ND-APO     New Dimension PlugIn APO
     T code: SM30
     Table:     CIFIMODGEN
Connection pt     Counter     Program     Variant
MAT_INS        1     RIMODGEN     RSG_BTE
But system is not generating NEW Integration Model.
Reference from SAP Help:
Make the following settings to change to online transfer:
     Use transaction CFC9 to call the screen Change Target-System-Independent Settings in CIF. Under Change Transfer for Master Data, choose BTE Transfer, Immediately. As of SAP R/3 4.0B, you can make this setting in CIF Customizing in SAP R/3 under Basic Settings for the Data Transfer ® Configure Change Transfer for Master Data.
     Use transaction SM30 to call the screen Maintain Table Views: Initial Screen. Call table CIFIMODGEN. You see the screen Change View "Customizing Automatic Generation of Integration Models". You determine the procedure for adapting the integration model by making entries in this database table.

Did you run program RIMODGEN in SE38 with appropriate variant to generate new integration models ? The spro settings or CFC9 have nothing to do with generation of new integration models. try to do some forum search on Integration Models and you may get some clue.

Similar Messages

Integration model generation

Hi,
We have a integration model for master data- Schedule lines and contracts. We have a background job that generates and activates the model. If I regenerate the model in CFM1, does it hurt anything for the job?
I think every time you generate a model, a new model will be generated right? Does this cause any discrepancy?
Thanks.

There are two types of sending data to APO through CIF
1) Sending only changes (Delta)
2) Sending everything (Delta+ New creation).
Considering there are three materials which changed on a certain day then just activating the IM model will work perfectly fine.
If along with three materials there was also an addition of a brand new material in R/3 . Then only by generating the Integration model will not help .
You will have to delete the original IM and recreate the same IM by using variants then activate the IM. By doing so it will consider as a initial transfer and send all the three old materials and the brand new material changes to APO.
If you feel it is useful pelase reward points.
The reason behind this behaviour : When you try to activate already existing IModel, then it only activates those objects which are already been generated and present during the generation of the IM.
So if a new material is created you will need more than just to generate. You will have to delete the model, generate the model, activate the model.
Thank You
My
Thanks,
My

Automatic generation of Proxies and RFC Adapters after change

After a maintenance on the server, or new transports on the xi, uploading new RFC function modules often the Proxies and RFC Adapters have to be restarted.
If you are not aware of that kind of changes the messages arrive in the wrong format, funny things happen and so on...
Question: Is it possible to scedule a job on the xi which automatically generates all proxies and adapters new in order to minimize message/service errors after uploads and changes?

Did you run program RIMODGEN in SE38 with appropriate variant to generate new integration models ? The spro settings or CFC9 have nothing to do with generation of new integration models. try to do some forum search on Integration Models and you may get some clue.

TVARV - Integration model.

hi
we currently use TVARV entries for specifying the materials in the integration models ( to CIF to APO). when we use a TVARV entry, we have a limitation of using only 500 entries at a times. so the number of materials in Integration Model is restricted.
is there any way not to specify the materials in the integration model but during runtime.
regards
Joe

Joe
Here is one way to solve the problem . Create a custom field in MARA . It will be a boolean field with values " " and some other non blank value say "Y" . For the materials that you like to transfer to APO , set the value of this custom field to "Y" .
You can enhance your integration model selection criteria and add fields to the IM selection. Add the custom field to the selection . Refer note 360723 . It explains how to add fields to IM selection
Save a variant of the integration model with value for custom field = "Y" . Now all you have to do on a daily basis is to go and set the custom field to Y for materials that you want to CIF to APO . This will make sure the materials get picked by the IM automatically.
Thanks
Saradha

CIF user exit works for Integration Model only when we De-Activate

Hi Friends,
I have enhanced the CIF User Exit [EXIT_SAPLMEAP_001] and populated the code in Include ZXCIFU14 for calculating the value of Open Order Quantities[OOQ] with respect to Material, Plant and Contracts, PO's then It transfer the OOQ from R/3 to APO.
Here it is Triggering the User Exit and working fine only when we De-Actrivate and Activate the Integration Model thru CFM3.
But In case of PO changes it is automatically calling the User Exit and Trasfer the OOQ from R/3 to APO.
When we change the Master Data it is not triggering the User Exit Automatically.
Could you someone suggest why we required to De-Activate the User Exit when we run the Integration Model every time.
Please suggest if we need to follow any pre required steps and why this behaviour for User Exit [EXIT_SAPLMEAP_001].
Waiting for your answer......Thanks in advance.......
Regards,
M N Kumar

Hello,
Could you please provide details about the master data you mentioned in your query. This exit is called for PO, PR ,confirmation, shipping notificatoin objects.
Rgs- Vikas

BOP selects products without an active ATP CIF integration model ?

Hello experts,
while setting up a GATP BOP Process I'm realizing that BOP is not automatically restricting the products from the loaction to which have an active ATP CIF model.
Example:
Location: 1000
Products: A, B, C
Product A is in APO for DP and SNP reasons and there is no ATP CIF model for A-1000 combination. Products B and C have been setup only for GATP reasons (but not for DP and SNP). If I run the BOP for entire location 1000 (product fiter = empty) it is picking all 3 products including product A and is rescheduling Sales orders for product A in location 1000 - although there is no GATP CIF model active.
Is this standard behaviour or do I miss anything here ? (I assumed that APO would never take a product into a BOP Filter which does not have an active and standing GATP integration model towards the ECC system.)
Regards
Thomas

Hi Thomas,
SAP documentation as in below URL
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/en/9c/066f3928025a6ee10000000a114084/frameset.htm
states for filtering criteria in its pre-requisite . It appears that it only looks for materials filtered in BOP (i.e it does not look for materials meant for ATP check in its CIF).
However, let us wait for comments from experts.
With regards,
Mrinal

More than one CIF integration model possible for material?

Hi Gurus,
we want to have two different integration models (with non-overlapping selections) for materials to be able to have separate selections, but we cannot make it work.
When we create them the first time and then activate them, everything works fine: both models send their products to APO in the initial load. However, if there are changes in products in both models, when we generate and then activate one of the models, the changes in the other one are lost: the generation-activation of the second model does not send any product to APO even if there were any changes in the master data (and we see the ALE pointers as processed in the table)
Is there any workaround to solve this issue in a system without CIF pointers in BDCP2?? The ECC system is below the relevant releases and will not be upgraded in the near future.
We could not find any mention to an existing limitation on the number of models being one neither in OSS notes nor the help pages.
thanks a lot,
Pablo

Pablo,
It is common to have multiple Integration Models for Materials.
I have never heard of transaction BDCP2. I also have never seen the problem you describe.
I usually prefer not to use change pointers at all for Master data, such as Materials. You can alter this behavior in CFC9, and instead use Business Transfer Events. This means that all fields that are relevant for 'change transfer' to SCM will move across almost immediately after saving the changed material master.
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_scm70/helpdata/EN/c8/cece3be9cd4432e10000000a11402f/frameset.htm
Also read the links contained in this page.
If you wish to actually perform a new 'initial load', then run the Integration model through program RIMODINI. It may be a lengthy run.
As always, check first in your Qual system before committing to production.
Best Regards,
DB49

Integration model desnot exist

Hi,
I got a error in delta report with the message
No active integration model exists in R/3
Message no. /SAPAPO/CIF184
The material in the plant has a change pointer "R". What does the "R" Change Pointers Exist with Method "Delete Complete Document" mean?
Is it saying that the location product is scheduled for deletion? Is there a check box checked in APO for deletion??
Also there is an active integration model with that product, location combination.
What does the message mean then???
Thanks.

You can always check for deletion flags in table /SAPAPO/LOC (check for deletion flag field LVORM) and /sapapo/MATLOC (check for deletion flag field LVORM)
Change pointer R means Completely Delete Document. This happens when someone deleted an order in APO and the same order deletion has not yet transferred to R3 due to some reason. The reason could be that you have set up change pointers in the system to stop automatic deletion transfer of orders or the fact that integration model does not exist.
So either make sure you have an active integration model setup for the product or get rid of the change pointer using /sapapo/c5 transaction

I upgraded from a 1st generation to the 4th generation Time capsule Model A1409. Since then I am getting interference on my wireless transmitter that sends signals from my Pay TV box to another TV downstairs. Is it the dual frequency and how do I stop i

I upgraded from a 1st generation to a 4th generation time capsule (model A4109) and since then my pay TV wireless transmitter has pulsating interference. This is obviously due to the new dual band frequency of the TC. Is there any way I can set it to one band and what will that do?

Go in and manually set the wireless channel for 2.4ghz or 5ghz (whichever your av sender is).. try different channels.

Automatic Generation of GR at Time of Purchase Order

Hi experts,
Please help me.............................
What is the " Automatic Generation GR"
and How the PO with GR is handled?
Thanks and regards,
Edited by: Hero on Jan 15, 2008 10:23 AM

Hi,
I 'm MM and I want to know how to creation PO automation GR.
I don't known SAP provides the option of having a GR generated automatically by the system at the time of PO.
Please help ................... in this case.
but I know SAP provides the option of having a PO generated automatically by the system at the time of GR and I success it.
Thank,

Question on automatic generation of PO's through ME59 ??

hi all,
while automatic generation of PO's from Pr's through me59n i need to check if the PR has OA ( outline agrement ) or contract assigned to it. if only OA or contract is assigned to PR then PO needs to be generated else PO should not be generated.
to summerize for PR's which does not have contract assigend to it. it should not generate PO's how do i restrict . please let me know.
Thanks,
Shiva..
Edited by: Alvaro Tejada Galindo on Mar 4, 2008 2:44 PM

Hi,
For automatic PO creation check the following steps.
1) Material Master purchasing view tick automatic PO check box
2) Vendor Master purchasing view tick automatic PO check box.
3) Maintain Source list for Vendor & Material.
4) Maintain Purchase Info Record.
5) Create a Purchase Requisition.
6) Use T.Code: ME59N & execute for PR for vendor, you will be able to create automatic PO.
Note:
1.Ensure that Purchase Info Record should be there.
2.If you have more than one vendor then fixes only one vendor in source list.
3.During PR creation select the check box of Source Determination
Regards,
Biju K

Automatic Generation of classes with required attribute names

Hi ,
I am new to XML technologies ...I am having a problem in deciding whether I
should use JAXB or Castor for data binding.
The problem is the attributes I am to use are named differently as that found in
the DTD.I have creted my own classes using the required attribute names and the
n mapped them using the Castor mapping with the attributes.
I was wondering how should I achieve --"automatic generation of classes" with th
e specified attribute names?
I understand that JAXB can be used to automatically generate classes ,but this
uses the same default names as that of the XML file ..is there a way of forcing
JAXB to generate classes that use my name attributes rather than that of the XM
L dtd
If I use Castor ..is there a way to do the same.Generate Classes with the specif
id attributes

Hi ,
I am new to XML technologies ...I am having a problem in deciding whether I
should use JAXB or Castor for data binding.
The problem is the attributes I am to use are named differently as that found in
the DTD.I have creted my own classes using the required attribute names and the
n mapped them using the Castor mapping with the attributes.
I was wondering how should I achieve --"automatic generation of classes" with th
e specified attribute names?
I understand that JAXB can be used to automatically generate classes ,but this
uses the same default names as that of the XML file ..is there a way of forcing
JAXB to generate classes that use my name attributes rather than that of the XM
L dtd
If I use Castor ..is there a way to do the same.Generate Classes with the specif
id attributes

System copy:integration models altered

Hi SCM experts,
We have APO 4.1 connected to ECC system.Recently the QAS data is refreshed with PRD data and after that all CIF integration model variants in QAS are pointing to PRD system. There are more than 100 integration model variants and changing the logical system mnaualy to QAS client is taking long time.
Is there any standrad report or t.code by means of which we can do a mass maintenance of these integration model variants ?

Hi deeparai,
You can change the name of logical system in ECC table CIF_IMOD. However, the integration models will not become active unless you generate them again (CFM1/2/3).
Hope this helps in reducing manual work.
regards,
biplab

CIF - Integration model name and APO application

Hi Experts,
In the CFM1 Transaction, there are 3 mandatory inputs are Model name, Logical system and APO application.
Logical systems are customized in CFC1 transaction. I couldn't trace the model name and application creation.
What is the transaction to customize/Create the new Model name and APO application.
Hope this is very simple question to you and expect your soon.
Thanks,
Saravanan V

Hi Somnath,
Thanks for ur reply.
First I saved the selection as variant. But it was not updated in the IM table.
Then I tried to generate the model and now I can see the details when I use the F4 help.
So, to create a integration model need to generate the variant once.
Thanks for the confirmation.
Thanks,
Saravanan V

Transfer of material from R/3 to APO, Problem in Integration model

Hi
I have created Integration model for Transferring material from R/3 to APO.
While activating the model, it is giving error with status as i..e. SYSFAIL
On clicking the status, I am getting the following message
"Logical system R3CON does not assigned to Business System Group"
?Where to locate the BSG in R/3 and assign before transferring matl to APO
i require the steps&help to solve the problem.
Thanks in advance to all members for the help.
Srikanth

Dear Srikant ,
Pls check you have followed the below steps in the same sequence for R3 and APO
CIF Settings in R/3
Check ALE settings or activate ALE settings
Define the logical system BD54
Assign logical system to a client SCC4
Set the RFC destination SM59
Assign target system and queue type CFC1
Maintain the SAP APO release NDV2
Activate BTEs for SAP APO integration BF11
User parameters for CIF CFC2
CIF Settings in APO
Check ALE settings or activate ALE settings
Define the logical system BD54
Assign logical system to a client SCC4
Set the RFC destination SM59
Set up business system group
Create BSG /SAPAPO/C1
Assign logical systems to BSG /SAPAPO/C2
Maintain distribution definitions /SAPAPO/CP1
User parameters for CIF /SAPAPO/C4
You have got stuck up somewhere in R3 setting , which I have marked in italic font i.e.Assign target system and queue type CFC1
I hope this will solve your problem .
Thanks ,
Digambar

Automatic generation of integration models

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for