Auxiliary cost component splitting issue in CK11N

Hi Friends,
We are using primary cost component split for the auxiliary cost component structure for getting more information.  We have a machine cost in the main cost component which is split in three auxiliary cost component i.e. Energy, Maintenance and depreciation. 
My belief is that with the activation of primary cost component split the costs have to flow from cost center in its primary cost element form to this cost component structure.
With the current data that we have, the cost component split is seen for all the three cost elements in the auxiliary cost component split u2013 But we are not able to trace the source of this amount as we do not have any splitting structure in place, the plan costs are only for Energy not for Maintenance and depreciation.
OKES Configuration:
Selection for assignment:
Cost Element               GMACHINE (only for Energy)
Activity Type     MACH
Splitting rules:
10                                        21     Equivalence Numbers Planning
Machine 0.64 is splitting into as follows Depreciation 0.41, Energy 0.12 and Maintenance 0.11
I am afraid from where splitting happening for Energy and depreciation and there is not receiving   splitting rules.
Appreciate for quick reply
Thanks
Govind

Hi to Evrybody,
I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning!  Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration!                                                                 We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
Best Regards,
Georgi Georgiev

Similar Messages

  • Reference to note 434873 - Auxiliary cost component split

    1) We use material ledger. We already have a primary cost component split defined in our system.
    2) We want to activate an auxiliary cost component split.
    3) We read the note 434873, paragraph 2)b) (activating an auxiliary cost component split).
    4) Who can assist us to develop the customer-specific Z program that is referenced in the note?

    Hi to Evrybody,
    I am trying to configure Primary Cost Component Split,, but I am confused what are the technical steps to configure such a structure 
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_40b/helpdata/en/7e/cb7e8643a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    There are several requirements how to configure in SAP Primary Cost Component Split:
    1)You assign a cost component structure in the CO version in Cost Center and Process cost planning!  Which Cost Component Structure? The Primary Cost Component Structure or the Cost Component Structure?
    2)You determined the prices through planned price iteration!                                                                 We set this indicator in the CO Version itself?
    3)You define a Cost Component Structure for Primary Cost Component Split of Product Cost Planning! How do we define it, via simply checking the check in OKTZ?
    I want to understand when you create Cost Component Structure and Primary Cost Component Structure, which one of these 2 needs to be assigned in the CO version in Cost Center Accounting? And the other thing is I do not make the difference between Cost Component Structure and Auxiliary Cost Component Structure? Could you please shortly describe what is the difference? Other thing is when you create Primary Cost Component Structure and its components, DO THEY INCLUDE ONLY RANGE OF PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS OR IT IS A TECHNICAL STEP ONLY TO CHECK THAT CHECK IN OKTZ FOR Primary Cost Component Split. Let me know, thank you very much for your help and cooperation again!
    Best Regards,
    Georgi Georgiev

  • Difference between cost component structure and cost component split

    can anyone explain me the difference between cost component structure and cost component split with simple example
    thanks
    santosh

    Hi ,
    cost component structure
    Definition
    Number that identifies the structure.
    Use
    In Product Cost Controlling, the cost component structure determines how the results of material costing are updated. The cost component structure groups the costs for each material according to cost component (such as material costs, internal activities, external activities, and overhead). If the material is used in the production of another material, the cost component split (which breaks down the costs according to material costs, internal activities, external activities, overhead, and so forth) remains in the system when the costs are rolled up.
    In the cost component split, you also define the following for material costing:
    Which part of the costs are fixed costs
    Which costs are
    cost of goods manufactured and what are sales and administration costs
    Which costs are relevant for stock valuation, commercial inventory valuation and tax inventory valuation
    When the cost component structure is assigned to the organizational units, you can specify that two cost component splits are created:
    Main cost component split
    This is the principal cost component split, meaning that it is used in the standard cost estimate, which can be used to update the material master. The main cost component split can be a cost component split for cost of goods manufactured or a primary cost component split.
    Auxiliary cost component split
    This can exist in addition to the main cost component split, and is not used in the standard cost estimate. It can be used for analysis purposes, in that it can be displayed with the cost estimate and passed on to Profitability Analysis.
    In Cost Center Accounting, the cost component structure determines how the results of the activity price calculation are updated. The cost component structure groups the costs for each activity type of the cost center according to components (such as material costs and labor costs). If an internal activity allocation is carried out, the cost component split (which breaks down the costs according to material, labor costs, and so forth) is retained at cost rollup.
    If the cost component split is not to be retained, you can create a switching structure for the cost component structure for Cost Center Accounting. In the switching structure, you specify which sender cost component goes into which receiver cost component.
    <b>require a cost component structure to calculate prices using cost component split.</b>
    For each cost component structure you define a component such as energy, personnel, or raw materials. The components combine all costs occuring for a particular cost element area. In this way, you ensure greater cost transparency in activity price calculation when putting together the activity type prices - for example, it becomes easier to find how much of the activity price is taken up by the material costs.
    In activity allocation, the cost component structure remains constant, meaning that the receiver takes on the sender cost elements and that the allocated costs are posted in the same cost components in the receiver as in the sender.
    A cost component structure can have a maximum of 40 defined cost components.
    Cost components are assigned to cost elements. You thereby determine which cost elements go to which rows in the structure, and how these components are updated in price calculation.
    Hope ths helps
    Please rewad points
    Sunil

  • Error in CK11n - The system could not determine a cost component split for

    Hi All,
    When i run CK11n i have following error:
    The system could not determine a cost component split for the internal activity with activity type 502000 of cost center 10100.
    Procedure
    Check the master data for activity type 502000 of cost center 10100. It is possible that no activity price calculation has been carried out for the cost center.
    could any one give me solution
    Thanking you.

    Well, did you run activity price calculation for the relevant cost center(s)?
    The CCS you're using for product costing (either your COGM split, or the auxillary) has been marked as a "primary" cost component split.  It wants to break secondary costs down into their cost components, and assign those components to components in its own structure.
    Wihout a planned CCS for the activity, this isn't possible.  (This is normally calculated by KSPI during planning.)
    Either calculate an activity CCS is KSPI, assuming that all the prerequisites are in place for that, or uncheck the "primary cost component split" indicator in your costing variant configuration.

  • Activate Cost Component Split in Controlling Area Currency

    Hello,
    I have controlling area currency USD and company code currency INR. When I do WIP run then system is giving error messages "contr.area currecy is missing" and "not find valid cost component structure" and suggesting to maintain "Cost Component Split in Controlling Area Currency".
    When I maintain then after that I am not able to run CK11N for std.cost estimate only with the error "cost componenet spit costed with zero" and also system giving this message on front screen of ck11n, means not allowing to go into ck11n result screen.
    Could you please give me some tips or check point on this issue.
    Thanks
    Regards
    Ravi

    I'd revert to the Cost Component per Co Area currency config that you were forced to delete (as per your other post) - but this time, just for a Costing Type or a specific Val Variant and check the results.
    Maybe that'll throw some light... also check if you maintained all the Exchange Rate config in your system... check General Settings for all the config that is required.
    Cheers.

  • Material Ledger : Cost component split different in CO PC and ML

    Hello SAP People,
    In ML cost component split I don't have the same split that in CK13N COPC.
    History
    We changed the cost component structure in OKTZ, because we wanted to split on two different cost component the cost of Copper :
    -     Copper
    -     Primes :Premium cost (transformation cost for producer) on copper.
    In CK11N the split is OK and we can read the new cost element corresponding to premium cost.
    To split the costing tool goes on the purchase info records to read condition type that are different for copper and premium.
    The problem we have is that when we run Material ledger we are not able to see after a good receipt a similar split in the cost component view.
    We already run MLCCS_RESET and MLCCS_Startup programs this month and created new Raw material after. But it seems the ML do not take care of this and all the actual cost (I stop to single level) are on the copper cost component and there is nothing on Premium cost component.
    We just run single level on ML for current month.
    Could you please help me to explain why we are not able to obtain the correct split between Copper and u201CPrimesu201D

    Hi Marco,
    yes, these both are independent from each other. You will have no issue when these are different.
    It is very typical that you want to report different kind of information for activities as for materials.
    A typical setup might be
    Activity                                   Material
    Asset depreciation                   Raw Material Cost
    Room cost                               Energy
    Labour                                     Production Cost
    labour overhead                      Production Overhead
    Electricity                                 Packaging
    When you use the activity for the production of a material (confirmation CO15) the assignment goes normally to a single cost component in the material, above for example into production cost. This is controlled by the cost element. Only when the primary cost component split is activated and a transfer structure betweeen both is maintained you could achieve
    Asset depeciation, Room Cost, Labour overhead  -> Production overhead
    Labour -> Production Cost
    Electricity -> Energy
    Best regards,  Udo

  • Primary Cost Component Split in CO-PC

    Hi Experts,
    Could anybody define the exact steps to configure Primary Cost Component Split in CO-PC?
    I've tried unsuccessfully to do it:
    1) I've created Cost Component Structure 45 in OKTZ with Components only with PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS and marked this Cost Component Structure as Primary via checking the box in OKTZ.
    2) I've assigned this 45 Cost Component Structure in CO Version and I've also checked that the prices will be PURE ITERATIVE
    3) I've  assigned assigned 45 Cost Component Structure in OKTZ as AUXILIARY Cost Component Structure in OKTZ
    4) I've create Cost Component Structure 44 in OKTZ with Components including PRIMARY COST ELEMENTS and SECONDARY COST ELEMENTS (Cost Component Spli for COGM)
    5) I've assigned Cost Component Structure 44 in OKTZ as a MAIN Cost Component Structure
    6) I've also created TRANSFER STRUCTURE for Cost Components of 45 to Cost Components of 44
    Prerequisites:
    1) I was thinking about having Distribution Cycles in order to see all the Cost Elements in CO-PC
    2) Cost Splitting to put the Primary Cost Elements from CCA into the fixed part of the price
    3) Price Calculation
    Well frineds even though I executed CK11n I still encountered an errors, stating, that the system can not find the Secondary Cost Elements for Labour and Overheads in my Primary Cost Component Structure 45....
    I am really confused now. Could anybody help with this, thanks!

    Well..it seems you did correctly, but try to check if the activity master data is really assigned to same secondary cost element you set in OKTZ. Go for transaction KL03 and check it.
    Regards

  • Cost Component Splits

    Hello,
    We're using Special Procurement Keys in order to transfer cost estimates in a production plant to a DC.  These cost estimates currently all come over with a full cost component split.  For plants that do not belong to the same company, we don't want to see the cost component split at the receiving plant. 
    Is there any way to use Special Procurement Keys or Transfer Control so that Intercompany plant relationships don't transfer the cost component splits?
    Thanks,
    Nick

    Hello Nick,
    In SAP Product Costing, the cost will allway be stored in cost components and it will be tranferred in similar way to to higher level and tranfer to another plant. Even earlier we have faced similar issue. The better way is to understand how the system stores and do work around.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Santosh

  • Material ledger wrong cost component split

    i have change the price detemination from '2' to '3' in the material ledger in period 04/2011.
    now i wont to execute costing run for actual cost in period 10/2010. to do this i have update tables CKMLPRKEKO e CKMLPRKEPH..
    in this mode I don't have error in costing run, but i have a big problem . i don'have a correct cost component split becouse all the value is on row material.
    i give a look to the SAP table and i find table MLAUFKEPH and table MLKEPH that don't have data for period 10/2010.
    someone can help me?
    thank you.
    Your issue is not related to FI but with MM, therefore your thread was moved to MM forum so the experts will be able to help you better.
    FI Moderator.

    I think this table gets updated only during changes to the material price(Accounting View) thats basically price change.
    Once the Material is created, price changes are carried out using MR21.
    Rajeev

  • Actual Cost Component Split for cross company code transfers.

    Hi,
    My issue is as follows.
    Production process spans across 2 company codes.
    Goods are produced in production company code, transferred (via stock transport order) to marketing company code and sold to customers from marketing company code.
    Stock transport order follows sales scenario i.e.. marketing company code creates purchase order for goods from production company code and production company code bills marketing for the goods.
    Actual costing / Material ledger is implemented in both company codes.
    We would like to roll-up (transfer) actual cost component split from production company code to marketing company (in a similar way as in product cost planning in cross-company scenario).
    However, due to the fact that the transfer between the companies is in fact a "sales" the goods in marketing company code are seen as externally purchased and the only cost component we can create is based on PO conditions. But we want to get the info about production cost component split.
    Once again this is for ACTUAL cost component split.
    I would be grateful for any ideas.
    Thanks,
    Szymon

    Hi Udo / Szymon.
    I have a question about this issue.
    In the sap help  about multiple valuations / group costing:
    http://help.sap.com/saphelp_46c/helpdata/en/7e/cb848443a311d189ee0000e81ddfac/content.htm
    Its not clear if this can roll up the Actual CCS? or what it do? My question is because i read the documentation of  bussiness function: LOG_MM_SIT,and also the book *Actual Costing with The SAP Material Ledger*
    states that we can handle the rollup of actual cost component split inter-company only with this BF active.
    Could you clarify about this?
    thanks!!
    Arturo.
    Group Valuation
    Goods movements between affiliated companies not involving intercompany profits are processed using the group view. This view determines the actual cost of goods manufactured for the group, and does not include any intercompany profits. You can, however, display internal profits as delta profits in the legal and/or profit center views.
    When you define cost components, you can specify that internal profits between company codes and/or profit centers are shown in detail in the cost component split. You activate these delta profits for the group valuation in the attributes of the cost components.
    For each cost component structure, there can only be one cost component under which the delta profit is shown. This means that neither the legal view nor the profit center view can have more than one cost component for the delta profit.
    To cost multiple values, you define a costing type for each valuation approach in Customizing for Product Cost Planning. You use the costing type to specify which valuation approach you require. You define each costing type in a new costing variant and carry out a cost estimate with this costing variant.
    Group Costing and Multiple Valuation Approaches
    In-Depth Detail of the Value-Added Chain: Partner Cost Component Split
    You can display in detail the costs of materials and services of every company department in the value-added chain for every stage of the production process. The partner can be traced for every material used. To do this, you define a partner version, which enables the value-added portions of each manufacturing level to be displayed in detail. For further information about this, see Partners and Direct Partners.
    The group cost component split can be displayed according to your partner definition. You can display the cost structures of the partners hierarchically according to your requirements, such as the company code segments on the highest level and the plant or profit center segments underneath.
    To display partner cost component splits, define a partner version in Customizing and enter it in the costing type.

  • Cost Component Splitting in Joint Production

    Hello.
    I meet a trouble in the cost component splitting for the co-product.
    I tried to creat a BOM like :
                                 A                       B
                                  C (CCS1)           D(CCS2)
    the raw material C&D are in different cost component,and the manufacturing matertials are A&B.
    and I set the apportionment structure like A(CCS1 100%,CCS2 50%)   B(CCS1 0%, CCS2 50%)
    Then i run the CK11N,and the result is correct.
    But the problem is as following:
    when I creat a BOM like :
                                 A                       B
                                              E
                                  C (CCS1)          D(CCS2)
    the raw material C&D are in different cost component,and the semi-product matertial is E,then E is producted for finished product A&B.
    and I set the apportionment structure like A(CCS1 100%,CCS2 50%)   B(CCS1 0%, CCS2 50%)
    then i run the CK11N,and the result is wrong.
    whatever i set the apportionment structure,the result of the CCS is  A (CCS1 50%,CCS2 50%),B(CCS1 50%,CCS2 50%)
    anybody can tell me how i can get the correct result?
                                                                                    Roc
    Edited by: Roc Roc on Jan 4, 2010 11:42 AM

    Hi
    Make cost splitting structure and assigne to Production Cost Center.
    Run Cost splitting KSS2 for cost splitting according to activity types.
    bukhari

  • Product Costing - Standard Cost Component Split on Multi Level BOM's

    Hi,
    We are the process of introducing SAP for all back office and manufacturing activities.
    I am currently trying to verify that the product cost calculation for Multi-Level BOMs in our Legacy system matches the cost roll up or cost estimate in SAP at not only a Total Cost Level but the cost component split must be accurate also. So far, all the costs roll up correctly at a total cost level but I have noticed one issue:
    When I run a cost estimate for a single level BOM the cost estimate will split the components accurately into Material, Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable overhead, However, when this component is then used in the next level of manufacturing all the Labor, Fixed Overhead and Variable Overhead Cost is grouped under Material.
    Q1.) Is there a SAP setting or config change that will keep the previous Labor, Fixed OH and Variable OH cost in these categories as the material is rolled up to finished product level?
    Q2.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the Finished Goods Standard Cost split by each of there rolled up Components? This would need to split the Total Material, Total Labor, Total Fixed OH and Total VO required to make the Finished Product. 
    Q3.) Is there a standard report / view where I can see the added value (Absorption) by component split (Labor, Fixed OH, Variable OH) for every Manufactured Part?
    Any help you can provide would be greatly appreciated.
    Thanks & Regards,
    Brian

    Actuall I just tried again and it did ask for me S number and I put it in and I did not have "authorization" to access
    Error Message - Access denied (R/3)
    What happened?
    You do not have permission to access this Object
    What can you do?
    Please contact a consulting adminstrative
    Error code: WEBSMP106-20080214172231-0015
    Error details: 2491DD9-702/1A053/3162-71A9CFA5-3CB9265-2992F9
    Service Name: SAPIDB
    Service Server: WEBSMP106
    Process-ID: 4640
    Thread-ID: 6020
    Sorry for any inconvenience.
    Your SAP Service Marketplace Team

  • Change Analyze cost component split CK80_99 or CK13N.

    HI experts,
    How or where can i change report CK80_99 or CK13N? I don´t know which is it report? I need some summarization row to this report, for example:
    Cost component split:
    10 raw material
    20 wraps
    10-20 material in sum - Summarization
    30 wages
    40 overhead
    10-40 production costs - sumarization
    Thanks a lot, for Your help.
    Gustavo

    Hi,
    CK13N transaction allows you to see information of standard costs in below formts.
    1.Cost itemisation-cost of each item which is responsible for standard cost and summation of all elements in last row.
    2.Cost component-these are configured cost sets based on local cost reporting method.
    3.Costing level with cost component-This replica of your BOM structure with additional information cost for each level.
    Your issue is realated with #2 in the above list.
    I hope following steps will help you to get that information,
    In CK13 transaction call the cost component report.Download this report into excel format and sum up as per your requirement.
    or else if you want configure existing cost components under expected groups in cost component config.
    Hope this helps you.
    Ashok

  • Report painter/writer for actual cost component split

    Hello Gurus,
    Any of you guys ever explored possibility of creating a report using report painter or writer that can give both Standard and Actual cost component splits in one report? Is it even possible without custom ABAP involvement?
    Thanks
    RG

    Hi Raghu,
    After your reply, I am getting a doubt..
    Have you Activated Material Ledger? When you say Actual Cost Component Split, are you talking about it what you get in Actual Costing/Material Ledger?
    If yes, then you can map your cost compnents for Actual Costing in the path SPROControllingProfitability AnalysisMaster Data Valuation--Setup Valuation using Material Cost Estimate -- Define Access to Actual Costing / Material Ledger
    Further, there are no standard reports available in COPA. Try to build a report comprising two columns, 1st column with the value fields which are mapped for Standard Cost Components and 2nd column with the Value Fields which you have assined for Actual Costing under the above path.
    You will be able to get the comparison...
    Pls don't hesitate to call me for further assistance....
    Srikanth Munnaluri

  • Actual Cost component split - Per PO

    Dear ML Experts,
    We have activated Material Ledger and Actual costing/ Actual cost component split in our implementation. The standard cost is based on delivery costs and there is no manufacturing involved. In order to test ML, we created some POs and did a GR and IR for those POs. When I look at the Material Price analysis on the Price Determination Structure View, I can see the Price differences per transaction (Goods receipt, Invoice receipt).
    But when I go to the Cost component View (Actual), I cannot drill down into the individual transactions. I am able to see the actual cost component split only at the summarized level across multiple transactions. I can see the category Purchase Order under Receipts, but I am unable to drill down to see the actual cost component split for the individual transactions (goods receipts, invoice receipts).  Did I miss anything on the configuration? The client wants to see the price differences per cost component per transaction and actual cost component split per transaction.
    Is it possible to view this information using standard configuration? Would I have to change the controlling level in order to achieve this?
    Can you please provide your advice?
    Thanks,
    Balram

    Hi Balram.
    If you have access to an IDES system, you can see a Cost Component split like this:
    As fas as I know, this is only for educational porpouses. In the standard System, its not recomended have the detail of the split per movement, due to the huge amount of data genereted. There is a Flag that control this, in a Txxx table (i dont have access to the system right now).
    If you really want this functionality, write SAP in the marketplace, and I guess their response is exactly what im saying.
    Arturo.

Maybe you are looking for

  • OT: Did you know you can change your profile to show your real name, rather than just your Adobe ID?

    I realize this is off-topic for this particular forum, but I hope it may help some readers. Since this forum is "where I live" in the Adobe forums, I wanted top share it here first. Perhaps after some feedback to refine things, I may post it elsewher

  • Advice on slideshows

    Hi All, So im now developing another site and i need to display a photo gallery. I have it in my head to have slices, rectangular in shape of several pictures that are positioned in the middle of the page, that fade in and out, all at different times

  • Formatting OLE object to variable file paths.

    I am currently using the trial version (2008) of Crystal Reports...at least for the next 7 1/2 days!  I have worked through all my problems/questions except one.  I am trying to insert a SolidWorks drawing document as an OLE object (linked) & the fil

  • Re: Nokia Care Centre

    Dear Nokia Support Team, I recently got my Lumia 710's screen repaired frm a NCC in India. After that the screen takes some time to show up after I press the on/off button. I am also sure that they have changed my phone's body bcoz my phone was in co

  • 2012 Upgrade to R2 - Client Protection Agent Upgrade - Reboot?

    MSFT states in their upgrade doc for DPM 2012 R2 "You must upgrade all of the protection agents. This might require a restart of the protected computer." What has been your experience reboot/no reboot as I know agent upgrades during past couple years