BAPI_PO_CREATE1 - PO not created due to wrong account assignment

Hello,
I'm trying to use this BAPI for a PO that I can create with ME21n, so I'm asking you what can be wrong with my input data. Here are the facts:
A - Message returned: KI / 265: Cost Center 1000 / 1000 does not exist;
B - Account Assignment Category = 'K' (Cost Center);
C - G/L account exists and is valid for the PO date;
D - Cost center exists and is valid for the PO date;
Here's how I'm filling the POACCOUNT table (one item only)
PO_ITEM = 00010
SERIAL_NO = 01
CREAT_DATE = 20.10.2009
GL_ACCOUNT = 614000
COSTCENTER = 1000
CO_AREA = 1000
In the POACCOUNTX table I filled the appropriate fields
Please remind that the PO enters fine with ME21n.
Any clues?
Regards,
Joã

Hi,
do you get the same error Ki265 also in the online transaction ME21N?
Maybe you need to specify POACCOUNT-COSTCENTER with leading zeros; like
"0000001000".
Please check In your test data POHEADER-COMP_CODE and POHEADERX-COMP_CODE, these should be filled as well.
If you still have a problem with the BAPI creation, please create a SAP ticket and use the notes 375886 and 539978
to prive us with a test data to check in SE37.
Regards,
Edit

Similar Messages

I can not create a new user account on eprint

i can not create a new user account on eprint. I have been trying for over an hour and it repeats telling me that my email addresses are not entered correctly, however they match. ?

I have tried to create an account via ePrintCenter and it seems that the published application has several flaws in interpreting the provided input.
1) In the Filed for last Name I enter my last name, which consist of only Alph Characters. The form however thinks that there is some sort of special character and rejects my Input.
2) E-Mail address. is not identical; OK, so I do a quick OCR on the E-Mail and guess what they are identical. Again the form Fails to recognize this.
3) Enter a password (2 Fields) and a third is displayed which is marked as "*required" but is not labeled as to what the required info could possibly be. Or is it a 3 password confirmation box, who knows.
All I know is that a simple registration is a major pain with this HP site.
Any Help as to how to alleviate this would of course be greatly appreciated.

Error depreciation run "GL account 2999999 not created in chart of account"

Dear all,
I am facing a very confusing error message. My customer has been live with SAP for over 2 years, and everything has worked fine. This month period 9) they got an unexpected error message during ordinary depreciation run. No depreciation is posted on GL accounts but if you look at asset values in AW01N you can see depreciation is posted on every asset. When I try to run restart depreciation in test mode I get an error message f5507 "GL account 2999999 not created in chart of accounts CASE". I do not understand anything. Why would this account suddenly after 2 years be used in depreciation run? It has never been created or ever used before? I have looked in transaction AO90 and the account is not there.
Very thankful for any help!
Thanks in advance!
Regards, Åsa

Hi,
1 - Execute dep test run with list asset check box, then find is there any new assets created with new asset class
2 - Check in AO90 Dep folder
3 - Check retained earning account either existing or not (T.Code: OB53)
4 - If you are using document splliting Check Docuemnt splliting Zero balance GL account
Regards
Viswa

Error while creating a PO with Account assignment

HI MM Gurus
In our case, we need to create the STO for account assignment cat `Unknown`.
In SPRO I maintained combination of account assign cat and item cat.
Now, while creating a PO with Account assign U we get Error message - ME069 :Unknown account assignment not defined for use here.
Please advise how to resolve this issue.

Hi
When you are posting actuals, you need to give true account assignment object. With U (unknown), system cannot identify which account to be posted. Change account assignment in PO to another.
In standard SAP Unknown account assignment is not allowed in PO's. Only exception is Blanket PO.
Unknown is allowed only in PR and Blanket PO.
The reason is logically you are releasing the PO to the external vendor or Plant in this case you must know the account assignment.
Regards,
Ninad Kshirsagar

Error while creating purchase order with account assignment category "A"

Dear All,
At the time of creating purchase order with account assignment category A - Asset its throwing error as " GL Account 123400 can not be used"
how to resolve this issue"
Edited by: Matt on Sep 16, 2010 10:09 AM - removed bold tags

HI,
Assign all assets GL to Asset Class
spro --> financial accounting new -->assets accounting --> assets accounting (lean Implementation) --> organization structures --> Assign GL
Hope Help U !
Regards,
Pardeep Malik

Activation is not possible due to warnings (Partner Assignment)

Hi,
While activating a contract getting an error "Activation is not possible due to warnings (Partner Assignment)"
Thanks and Regards
Srihari

Hi all
Just had an upgrade and I am experiencing the same problem: Message no. RECN027
Activation is not possible due to warnings (Partner Assignment) when trying to activate the Contract in RECN.
Where in the Business Partner do I change the validation of the partner please
Thanks in advance
Gavin

AET fields not created due to database limit

Hi Experts,
I am trying to create AET fields for BUT000 transaction table. But when i click on the 'Save and Generate' button for the AET field, i get a message 'Field enhancement for place INCL_EEW_BUT000 is not possible due to database limit'. Please help me understand how can i create the AET fields. Are any settings required to increase the database limit.
Ay pointers would be highly appreciated.
Regards,
Radhika

Hi Radhika,
Its a normal scenario when you have exceeded the no. of fields allowed to be added for a business transaction. The initial settings for AET settings is such that *a prefix 'ZA' is attached to each AET extension which gets created when create a field through AET*. Now since you have exceeded this limit, go to SPRO->CRM->UI Frame Work-> UI Frame Work Definition->AET->Define System Settings.
Here you can change the generation prefix from A to B. Now the system will allow you to add as many extra fields as you did for prefix 'ZA'. The only change you'll see is that the AET extension prefix will now be 'ZB' instead of 'ZA'.
When you have exceeded number of fields even for 'ZB' extension, you can change the prefix to 'C' to add further more fields.
Hope this helps.
Thanks
Vishal

Funds Management - Wrong Account Assignment getting cleared in PR

Hi All,
We are working on Funds Management implementation at our workplace and we are facing a problem relating to account assignment. (SAP ECC 6.0)
We have defined a Account Assignment Derivation for a material as
Material Number = A100 assigned to Commitment Item = ComItem1 and Funds Center = FunCen1.
Now during the creation of a PR for A100, where the Funds Center and Commitment Item fields are mandatory, the wrong commitment item is automatically getting populated (ComItem2 that was defined under a different Funds Center, instead of ComItem1 ;but the fund center field in the PR is alright) and they are also getting passed right up to the MIRO stage, where I get the message "No Commitment Item entered in Item" (here too the wrong funds center and commitment item from the PR are getting populated automatically)
What's worse is that the budget document contains the new commitment item ComItem2 created under FunCen1.
I am not clear as to where the assignment to the funds center and the commitment item in the PR happens - and given that the assignment is given as required, how are the wrong values getting populated and then allowed to proceed upto MIRO ?
Regards,
Wy

Hi Eli Klovsky,
Thanks for the suggestion - was helpful to find out the target fields through the trace.
We went to the details column for the target field in the rule definition structure, and activated the "Overwrite with New Value" field, and in this case, the new values of fund center and commitment item are getting over-written.
However, one problem I have faced is that for materials which have no assignments, when we create the PR on the same line as that of the previous PR (By changing the material number), the old values are not getting replaced. They are however getting replaced once we come back and create a new PR, or add the material on another line.
Have to explore this better - there might be some human errors, where the material number is changed on the same line as that of the previous material PR, in which case, the existence of the previous commitment item and fund centers can result in wrong allocations to other divisions..
@All,
Really sorry to be continuing this discussion here, is it possible to move this to the appropriate Public Sector group ?

Is it possible to create a PO without account Assignment or condition Info

Is it possible to create a purchase order with out Account Assignment ( not even single account assignement).
Is it possible to create a purchase order with out condition Information ( not even single condition information)

1. Yes, it can possible to create a purchase order with out Account Assignment ( not even single account assignement).
It depends upon the SPRO settings.
2. Condition Information is must for PO.
If helps please award points.
Thanks.

BAPI_PO_CREATE1 - E 06 436 In case of account assignment

Please, I need your help...
I am trying to create the PO´s since last week, but is imposible. I try to search posts about this same case but, nothing good to me.
Well, I am creating a Service PO using an agreement and buying to cost center.
When I execute the BAPI generate this messege:
E 06 436 In case of account assignment, please enter acc. assignment data for item .
I put the agreement and item in POITEM and checked in POITEMX. The system bring to me all fields of agreement, but don´t bring the account. In PO ITEM bring the ACCTASSCAT = K.
What I must to do to bring the Account Itens that are inside of my agreement?
Please, help me. I am with problems because I can´t do it.
Thanks a lot ,
Victoria.

Hi,
When we create Purchase Order using "BAPI_PO_CREATE1", it works for all cases but we can have problems when we create Service Items in PO. Either we get an error u201CPlease maintain services or limitsu201D or u201CIn case of Account assignment, please enter acc. assignment data for itemu201D.
Service PO occurs when we enter item category u2018Du2019 (Service) and Account category u2018Ku2019 (Cost Center).
When we use BAPI_PO_CREATE1 to create service PO, following tables are populated at item level:
a) POITEM
b) POITEMX
c) POACCOUNT
d) POACCOUNTX
e) POSERVICES
f) POSRVACCESSVALUES
For service items: POITEM-PCKG_NO = u20180000000001u2019. (assign package no as a dummy number)
Set PCKG_NO flag in POITEMX table as u2018Xu2019.
Package No is the link that connect POITEM table to POACCOUNT table through tables POSERVICES and POSRVACCESSVALUES.
Set POACCOUNT-SERIAL_NO to u201801u2019.
Set same PCKG_NO to u20180000000001u2019 in POSERVICES table. Maintain two entries in POSERVICES table like this:
WA_POSERVICES-PCKG_NO = u20180000000001u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-LINE_NO = u20180000000001u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-OUTL_IND = u2018Xu2019.
WA_POSERVICES-SUBPCKG_NO = u20180000000003u2019. (Dummy No.)
WA_POSERVICES-QUANTITY = u2018100.000u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-BASE_UOM = u2018EAu2019.
WA_POSERVICES-PRICE_UNIT = u20181u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-GR_PRICE = u2018100.000u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-SHORT_TEXT = u2018SERVICE TESTu2019.
APPEND WA_POSERVICES TO IT_POSERVICES.
WA_POSERVICES- PCKG_NO = u20180000000003u2019.
WA_POSERVICES- LINE_NO = u20180000000002u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-QUANTITY = u201810.000u2019.
WA_POSERVICES- BASE_UOM = u2018EAu2019.
WA_POSERVICES--PRICE_UNIT = u20181u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-GR_PRICE = u2018100.000u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-SHORT_TEXT = u2018SERVICE 1u2019.
WA_POSERVICES-MATL_GROUP = u20180012u2019.
APPEND WA_POSERVICES TO IT_POSERVICES.
Set PCKG_NO as SUB_PCKG_NO in table POSRVACCESSVALUES this:
WA_POSRVACCESSVALUES-PCKG_NO = u20180000000003u2019.
WA_POSRVACCESSVALUES-LINE_NO = u20180000000002u2019.
WA_POSRVACCESSVALUES-SERNO_LINE = u201801u2019.
WA_POSRVACCESSVALUES-SERIAL_NO = u201801u2019.
WA_POSRVACCESSVALUES-QUANTITY = u201910.000u2019.
APPEND WA_POSRVACCESSVALUES TO IT_ POSRVACCESSVALUES.
This logic will work definitely and PO Service Items will be created.

While Creating PO its saying account assignment mandatory for the material.

Dear All
I have created a material with Mechanical Engineering as Industry sector and ROH as Material Type.
For this material i created PR and PO both the time it said account assignment is mandatory.
Why this happens?
I don't want to enter any account assignment category.
Pls help.
Regards
Depin

Hi,
Normally purchasing ROH with PO needn't to assign the account assignment category, but if don't create accounting view for the ROH material or create the accounting view without valuation class assigned, system can't find the relevant stock account automatically, so will issue the message just like "Account assignment is mandatory".
So you should check the material master data, if it's fine, then you will not see the message any more!
Good luck
Tao

Profit Center in Create PO w/o Account Assignment Category

Hi SAP Experts,
Still related to my previous post re: display of the Profit Center field in the PO create screen without Account Assignment Category. Have looked into the SAP HELP ECC 6.0 on why is it not part of the "Maintain AAC" but to no avail.
Please explain the following for my understanding:
1) Why is the <blank> AAC for no acct assignment cat is not in the maintain AAC in SPRO in ECC6.0?
2) If this is standard in ECC6.0, how can I add a new entry in Maintain AAC that will also behave as the <blank> AAC (no AAC)?
Your help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks!
Melanie

Hi Melanie,
1. The simple answer is that Acc assignment cat is mandatory , so if we filled with blank then the system wont allow it
2. Blank acc assigment mean not acc assignment need for the Transaction so you cannot set a blank acc assigmment which behave like an exist acc assigment.
Sorry , not mean to harass , but its seem not possible. Maybe you need to think for another workaround for your requirement.

GR can not printed for PO-Multiple account assignment on single line item ,

Hi!
I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
Can you please let me have the solution ?
Thank snd regards,
Suranjana

> I made a pr with single line item with 3 account assignment on percentage basis.I created a PO against .GR non valuated was automatically ticked so no account assignment was created at the time of GR posting.
When you are having the multiple account assignment, then the system will force you to have GR-non valuated indicator being flagged which results in the fact there is not any FI document at GR posting stage and this is the standard feature of SAP.
> Can I make a valuted GR against PO line item with multiple account assignment.
No, not at all. The disability of GR indicator can be set in OME9 with account assignment category
> I faced another problem .I displayed the GR and after ticking out put check box in the general data page of the GR doc. the output is being saved but the update is terminated immediately.and no output page is generated in this item level.This output problem is not there at the time of single account assignment at PO line item.
In fact, it is possible to maintain multiple account assignment for each and every PO line item by selecting the 'Multiple Account Assignment' button in the 'Account Assignment' View of the Item Detail of PO. However, for such multiple account assignment selection, no accounting document will be generated upon GR maintenance. This can only be done during IR via LIV process.

Profit center is not updated in a PO Account assignment

Hi,
I have a requirement to change plant and profit center on PO items. I use account assignment category - A - Asset on PO.
I was not able to change profit center on PO item even though i changed plant on item. I am using BAPI_PO_change to update plant and profitcenter. Another observatio is that profit center gets updated at EKPO but not in EKKN.
For some po's i was not even able to change profit center on ME22N also.
Inputs are appreciated.
Priya.

Priya,
I have the same issue now. Did you get any solution for this. If so, please let me know.
Thanks
Sailaja

Any Standard Functional Module to create 1008 Infotype its Account Assign.

Hi
can any body pls help me to know any standard FM to create 1008 Account Assignment ?
dont want to go for BDC for this....
Points will be there for right answers for sure.
Regards
Meeta Nair

Hi
Txs for your response but, am looking a Standard FM which will ask for position id and then create its account assign infotype 1008.
pls help on this points will be there for sure.
Regards
Meeta

BAPI_PO_CREATE1 - PO not created due to wrong account assignment

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for