BOM-Recursive

Hi All,
What is recursiveness allowed in BOMs

Hi Anand,,
If the header BOM material same you are using as a component then BOM become Recursive.
If you create a recursive BOM, you must decide whether you want to allow recursiveness or delete the component that caused the recursiveness,
Two users create a material BOM at the same time. Each user enters the BOM header material entered by the other user as a component.
One user saves the BOM. When the second user tries to save the BOM, the system recognizes recursiveness and sets the recursive indicator. The second user sees an online message about the recursiveness.
Please refer this link also,
[BOM-Recursive|http://help.sap.com/search/highlightContent.jsp]
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

Similar Messages

BOM Recursiveness Check

Hi,
In BOM recursiveness check, whether the system will consider the BOM usage into account?
As per the note 42891,
For reasons of performance, the system does not make any fine distinctions during the recursiveness check in the BOM explosion.
1. BOM items of a bill of material are treated as being assigned to all variants of a variant BOM or as being assigned to all configured materials of a configured bill of material.
2. The effectivity (date / parameter effectivity) is not taken into account.
3. The plant is not taken into account.
4. The usage is not taken into account.
Here the usage is not taken into account, what does it mean?
Explain please.
Thanks,
Suresh.

Hello Suresh,
It means that during the recursive check , it does not check if it is a different plant or a usage . if a bom is created for Plant A and usage 3 , and you now try to create a bom for Plant B or usage 1, system will still raise an error and find it recursive.
Eg if you already have a BOM with
Header Material A
     Component B
      Usage 1
And now if you create a BOM with
Header Material B
     Component A
      Usage 5
It will be seen as recursive and you should receive an error.
Hope that helps
Regards
Amber

BOM RECURSIVE NESS

Hi All,
Can any one guide me regarding the steps of OSS note 839879 - Trace 'BOM is recursive' i.e procedure to trace bom RECURSIVENESS.
Thanks in Adv

Hi ,
Note 681126 was useful.
In my scenario
Material.- A and B in plant X.....A and B are co-product for this plant and in BOM B is a component of A
Material- C and B in plant Y...C and B are not the co product for this plant and in BOM B is a component of C. Here for B it is asking for "recusrsive allowed".
When i remove tick "co-product" (in BOM) for item B in plant x, then for item B in plant Y it is not asking for recursiveness.
Material C is not in Plant X.
Low level code for A, B & C are asfollows
A-000
B-011
C-005
I am not able to understand why it is behaving this way.
Regards,
Satyajit

BOM Recursive logic

Hello All,
I need a logic for re-cursive call.I am drilling down the BOM components.Example as below.
If I have A as header with B as component and again B may have C as component again C may have D and E as components in it.
Now if I pass A i should find B,C,D,E,F.
Please suggest somebody some idea how to get this logic?
I am using the function module CS_BOM_EXPL_MAT_V2 to get the components of a BOM.
Regards
Mahesh

Hello Mahesh
I would assume that if you set IMPORTING parameter MEHRS ( Multi-level explosion ) = 'X' and do not restrict the multi-level explosion then you should get the entire hierarchy.
Regards
Uwe

Error Msg while BOM creation - Maximum low-level code 999 reached

Dear Expert,
After uploading the BOM (T-code: CS01) of material XXXXXXX in XXXX plant, error message through express message is coming regarding maximum low-level code 999 and the BOM is automatically getting deleted.
Error Info... Maximum low-level code 999 reached
Thanks & Rgds,
Dipen

Is by any chance this BOM recursive?
If so, you need to allow recursiveness specifically.

Discontinuation indicator and follow up material.

Hi,
I am facing the strange issue for which i need your expertise. The requirement is like:
1. "X" material is discontinued and "Y" is as follow-up in two plants A & B. Discontinaution group and follow-up group has also been assigned in the BOM.
2. Now The client want to reverse the settings . means "Y" should be discontinued and "X" should be follow-up in both plants A & B.
Now I have removed the discontinuation indicator and follow up material from "X" in both plants. But when I am going to discontinue the "Y" material and putting " X" as a follow-up material, The system is giving the message "The specified follow-up material results in recursiveness
Message no. M3609
Diagnosis
You have entered a follow-up material. However, the BOM explosion for the follow-up material leads to the discontinued material, resulting in unpermissible recursiveness.
Procedure
Enter another follow-up material or cancel the entry.
Please suggest me where I am missing in my settings and what is the reason for this message.
Regards
Deepak Sharma

Dear ,
Check the following :
1.Validity of the Bill Of Material or any deletion flag is set in the present BOM.
2.Please check the following SAP notes :
Note 161742 - Consulting note: BOM recursion/low-level code 999
Note 839879 - Trace 'BOM is recursive'
Note 139517 - Recursiveness for follow-up materials
Note 42891 - Recursiveness check
Hope this will help you to figure it out
Regards
JH

Allocation failure with CS40

As a regular practice we are allocationg the material via t code CS40 but as an observation we found material not allocated to BOM and while saving it is prompting with below message
Message NO 29250
You want to copy material XXX to an additional item. The number of
characters is greater than the copy default.
for re validation when we checks we found the material is not allocated and found in log as update terminated with below message
The BOM update terminates with the error
29 281: Maximum low-level code 999 reached
There for we updated the note - SAP Note 484640 - Update termination 29281: Maximum
low-level code 999 reached
But no use ....please help us on this earliest.

Hi,
Here are some other useful SAP notes regarding this error:
- 161742: Consulting note: BOM recursion/low-level code 999
- 109550: Search for recursive BOM with follow-up material
- 544489: FAQ Recursiveness check / low-level code assignment (see questions 2, 4 and 5)
- 140573: Low-level code 999 for joint production
- 1160586: CS01/02/40: Maximum low level code 999 reached dump (29 281)
Regards,
Marcelo

Service procuremnt:gate pass issue

Hi,
we want to send the motor for rewinding outside the company.
as the repairing charges will be confirmed by vendor only when the motor is opened and checked by vendor at vendor site. so we need to send the motor with gate pass to vendor and after the check we wiil make po with respect to given quotation.
how sap system can issue and print the gate pass.
how we can check the report like moter sent ,motor received and the balance motor at vendor.
regards
raman

Hi,
it is possible through new development only,
here is one possible solution,
maintain the split valuation for the material with different valuation types as damaged & reapaired,
create one BOM (recursive allowed ) indicator,
maintain one info record with the sub contracting vendor,
1.create one one new screen for gate pass entry with the input options of vendor,material no,quantity,valuation type and date,
if required print the gate pass with above details,
2. create one Z table to store the all above data
3. create one new movement type with replica of 541.
4.restrict the new movement type for MIGO transaction only
5.impliment the BADI MB_MIGO_BADI to get the new tab for MIGO screen with the point 1 input details,
(logic as new tab shuold only reflect for the new mvt )
6.if the user enters the point 1 details in the new tab of MIGO transaction ,system need to check the customised table ,and allow the posting after the validation only
7.at the time of MIGO with new mvt type enter the material with batch.
8. now the material issued to the sub contractor with valuation type as a 'damaged',
9.create one sub contracting PO for the material with bacth 'repaired'
10. as per the normal , receive the goods against PO.
at any point of time you can trace the material with batch wise.
hope this is helpful
regards
chenna

Material cost estimate using recursive BOM

Hello everybody.
I want create material cost estimate (CK11N) using a recipe with recursive BOM. When I execute the transaction CK11N the following message is display Costing of cycle 00001 does not converge
Do you know what is missing?
Thanks in advance.

Dear,
Message no CK740?
Please do check the link below......
http://help.sap.com/erp2005_ehp_03/helpdata/EN/f8/a3e333bf3d11d189900000e8214595/content.htm
and OSS note : 858384
Regards,
R.Brahmankar

System ask for recursive BOM

To SAP GURU,
I have 1 problem in master ecipre .I have halb( SFG-1 ) which is having 2 halbs ( SFG-2 & SFG-3 ). Again this 2 halb is having their multilevel bom .respectvely .SFG-2 is having co product ( Co po -1 ) which is again input in SFG-1 .
Now when i am saving recipe of SFG-1 system ask me that SFG-2 mat code is recursive & for also co product system ask me about recursive .Now unless & untill i will click on recursive allowed system dont allow me to save the recipe .Even if i saved recipe by clicking on recursive allowed in mrp run system not explode the BOM of SFG-2 .
Only when header material is used in bom compnent then only bom will be recursive but in my case even if i have not used header material in any of my bom component still system ask me abaut recursive ..So can u tell me is i am missing some where or some solution is their Now i am trying to solvr it by SAP notwes 161742.( Or any latest SAP note is available )
Please tell me is their any valid solution .
SANIL

Sanil,
what ever you mentioned is true , the only problem you are facing error is related to BOM level.
SFG-2 and its co product ( Co po -1 ) you are putting in same BOM level ( ie in the BOM of SFG-1 )thats why you are getting this error.
as Co Po-1 will be produced after the production of SFG-2 so it can be at lower level where SFG-2 is maintained.
Think on it , its logiocaly correct , your co product can be produced before your main product.
Check out and revert back.
Regards
Ritesh

Change material BOM / item / Class Recursion

I'm looking for a way to change the "recursiveness allowed" flags in the "Class Recursion" tab of a BOM item in transaction CS02. The flag corresponds with the fiels REKRS in table CLRK. No BAPI or FM found after half a day of searching. The CSAP_* function modules don't seem to cover this data.

Hi,
This indicator is automatically set based on the conditions mentioned here [Class Recursiveness|http://help.sap.com/saphelp_470/helpdata/en/ea/e9b54a4c7211d189520000e829fbbd/content.htm]. You can have look at fm CSAI_BOM_MAINTAIN which has that indicator FL_RECURSIVE. As the documentation says
The system recognizes recursiveness for a class item if the following objects are allocated to the class in the class item:
    The BOM header material
    A material with a BOM which contains the BOM header material as an item
    A class to which one of the materials described above is allocated
You can try logics like removing the header material from the item, so that recursiveness is avoided, May be by using CSAP_BOM_ITEM_MAINTAIN. Explode the existing BOM using CS_BOM_EXPLOSION and compare the header & item materials.

LLC generation with a "recursiveness allowed" indicator in BOM

Dear planning friends,
I have the following problem with the low-level code generation in SNP.
We have few products, that have indicator "recursiveness allowed" in the material BOM.
How in the APO side the PPM reflects that (the circular reference - the product is produced from itself and another component). Has something to do with the "Primary product" indicator in the PPM? If yes, is it checked automatically (in the PP/DS PPM and in SNP PPM)? Should it be checked for the input or for the output product.
Anyway now the LLC generation fails. I'd like to include these materials in planning, but how to set up the master data?
Thank you for your help.
Message was edited by:
Mikhail Kenanoff

Hi Mikhail,
Please note recursiveness in BOM components is not standard in APO PPMs. <a href="http://service.sap.com/notes">SMP Notes</a> 611063 gives the restrictions where recursiveness is allowed. You may also like to look at Note 648093.
Thanks,
Somnath

Incorrect Cost in the Cost Run - Recursive Indicator in the BOM.

Dear All,
We have an issue with few materials where in the Cost run cost is incorrect.On Further analysis we got to know that this is because the recursive flags set for in the costing BOMs caused the incorrect cost.I just want to know if any one of you have encountered this type of issue and how you fixed this issue.Please let me know.
Thanks,
dbk

Hi,
Please check if the following correction notes have been installed:
- 1487255
- 1448124
- 1437988
- 1428408
Best regards,
Antje

Batch derivation for recursive bom

hello,
anybody please help me. when iam doing batch derivation for recursive BOM its not working. my recipent batch no is alo coming in sender batch no. its doing deling between sender batch no and recipent batch no. how can i solve this issue.
thanks and regards
bhakta.

Hi Bhakta,
Bigger problem in your case is not multiple Batches of RM but more then one Batch No. of Header Material in single production Order.I guess in your case Batch No. are triggered at the time of GR and not in Production Order at the time of Release.Correct?
But up to my knowledge Batch Derivation is triggered at the time of Batch Creation in Production order.For which you have to first carried out Batch Derivation of sender Material.But in your cases the scenario is totally different due to Batch is created at the time of GR.So Difficult one and can be possible if you go with 1 Batch for 1 prod. order.
Regards,
Dhaval

Trying to resolve Recursive BOM Component issue in Tcode CO46

Hello,
I am trying to identify the problem component when running CO46 and getting a "Recursive BOM Component" message.
I thought I would try to catch the bad component in the debugger, but I can't seem to find where to put the Breakpoint or identify a field to put a Watchpoint on.
Has anyone else had this issue and were you able to ID the BOM Component that was causing the issue?
Thanks very much for your help.
Andy

Dear all,
I resolved the Issue myself
SPTO and MAST table table has the all the details
Regards,
Gaurav Sood

BOM-Recursive

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for