Budget planned values in period 13

Hi Guys,
We are posting our planned values for balance sheet acccounts. we are spreading the values from period 1-12,2010.I heard that these values should be posted in period 13 only .If thats true, whats the reason and significance of posting B/S values in period 13.

Hi MAVERICK,
Special Periods 13 -16 only for Financial Adjustment entries. It is not useful for Planning & budget.
So we can't maintain Planning & budget in special periods.
Regards,
Kishore K

Similar Messages

AW01N shows planned values in period 12 under posted values tab

Hi,
I need to change the useful life and depreciation key of an asset. Before the change, the 2009 depreciation values in AW01N under the posted values tab shows 500,000 monthly depreciation from period 1 to period 12 totalling 6M for that year.
After changing depreciation key to ZLNR which has a base value key of 24 (net book value), system added another line item for a planned value of 3.750M.
Why did the system add another planned value? I do not want to change the 2009 depreciation values. However, I must show that the depreciation values in 2010 will "catch up" i.e. decreased depreciation because of longer useful life.
Thanks and regards,
Tess

Resolved. I must close the 2009 fiscal year first before changing the useful life and the depreciation key.

BUDGET PLAN VALUE AND DISTRIBUTABLE VALUE ERROR

Hey Experts,
We have user Investment management for Budgeting process. We have been using this for last 5 years. After creating the AR and assigning them to the Budget program, we use IM34 to do the rollup of the plan values. After that to allocate the Planned values as budget value, we run the transcation code IMCCP1. For past all years this has been smooth, We found today that the program for 2011 has error as follows
When we did the distribution in jan 2011
Budget distributed             Current Budget         Distributable              Plan Values            Cumulative
10000                                10000                       10000                         10000                    10000
When we checked it this Feb 2011
Budget distributed             Current Budget         Distributable              Plan Values            Cumulative
10000                                20000                       20000                         20000                    20000
It is very surprising that the values have exactly doubled. There was no changes done for any AR of no one changed the IM34 run nor IMCCP1. Please help in resolving this issue.
Regards
Vikat

Hey Experts,
We have user Investment management for Budgeting process. We have been using this for last 5 years. After creating the AR and assigning them to the Budget program, we use IM34 to do the rollup of the plan values. After that to allocate the Planned values as budget value, we run the transcation code IMCCP1. For past all years this has been smooth, We found today that the program for 2011 has error as follows
When we did the distribution in jan 2011
Budget distributed /Current Budget /Distributable/ Plan Values /Cumulative
10000 /10000 /10000/ 10000 /10000
When we checked it this Feb 2011
Budget distributed/ Current Budget /Distributable /Plan Values /Cumulative
10000 /20000 /20000 /20000 /20000
It is very surprising that the values have exactly doubled. There was no changes done for any AR of no one changed the IM34 run nor IMCCP1. Please help in resolving this issue.
Regards
Vikat

Buget Upload, Planned values-KP06

Hi Eeveryone,
I posted budget ( planned values) for a cost center in KP06, and used version 1,its for year 2011 .I can see all the values in report KSBP which is planned line item report.
My problem is I have created a report painter report using LIbrary 0FL- and report executes by profit centers. In the Actual /Plan columns ,system is not extracting out planned values for year 2011. What could be the reason? In my QA client, there system shows the planned values in the same report.I compared the two systems , but everythign is the same.any idea??Thansk
Regards
Shaun

Hi
Am just making a wild guess... In OKEQ, under PCA tab just try by fiddling around with "Online transfer settings"
It wont have impact incase you have not activated EC-PCA...
Just check whether the FAGLFLEXP table is populated with plan records or not...
Also, check
1. If you done settings in GLP2 and GLL1
2. If you have maintained the doc type for planning in New GL and maintained No ranges
3. Try by executing T code FAGL_CO_PLAN.. This transfers the line items from CO-OM to New GL
Regards
Ajay M

Single project report for Plan values, Budget values,commitments & actual

Hi experts,
Highly appreciated if any experts can let me know report which can be used to view Plan values, Budget values , commitments & actual values for each and every WBS levels for given project.
I need one report to view all mentioned fields.
Kind regards,
Sam Lesha.

Dear Amit,
TX lot for your helpful quick answer, I checked the report, it's fine and i need to clear one more thing .
when i select Std profile as PS infor profile there i could find plan version 0 & 1. would it be pssible to know how i can add one more plan versions to this.
Tx in advance,
Reg,
Sam Lesha

Budget upload(Planned Values)

Hi All,
I uploaded some of my cost centers and cost elements as a test using integerated excel Tcode KP06.it gave me message changed planned values are posted.But when I try to look those in the Plan/actual report in general ledgre,I dont see any values in there.The report name in general ledgre is S_ALR_87009791.Could anyone please tell me how to display planned values after posting it thru KP06.Thanks
Regards
Shaun

Hi
Please check my earlier reply. You need to use FSE5N. You also need a planner profile for doing planning in FI.
Path in Easy access screen.
Accounting - Financial Accounting - General Ledger - Periodic Processing - Planning
Anand

Help re: plan values posting per period

Hi SDN forumers,
I would like to seek assistance on this concern of ours re: input of Cost Center planning values. We are using t-code KP06 and activated Integrated Excel for our data upload. The upload works fine, except that I cannot think of a way to input the plan values on an annual basis.
For example, I would like to input a 12,000 USD plan value for cost center A for fiscal year 2008. Instead of inputting it every month, I was thinking if I can just indicate periods 1-12 in the selection parameter in KP06 and indicate 12,000 USD so that the system would automatically designate 1,000 USD per period. I tried doing this but the system response is that it doesn't designate the amounts per period.
Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thanks and God Bless

Hi walter,
Where can I find the distribution key in KP06? I checked the Menu Paths in KP06 but cannot locate where I can select the distribution key. Is it connected with the Planning Layout?
Thanks

7KEX PCA Excel Upload - plan values not splitting between period

Hi All
I am using 7KEX to upload a csv file for PCA plan figures, on the layout I have created there is 1 column for each period however the only figure getting upload is period 1, the remaining periods are not getting any data. I have checked the CO upload program and this is working, compared the column for periods using the characterics "period"
Has anyone had this issue?
thanks for you help
Ifty

Hi!
Here some more information about the report S_ALR_87013336
. This report belongs to the group of drill-down/interactive reports.
This means that those reports are always aggregating/cumulating account
values in the following way:
'From'-Period: 0 (this is hard-coded in the system and cannot be
                  influenced by the selection criteria in the field
                  'From period')
'To'- Period:    selected period in the selection criteria.
This is because the drill-down reports like S_ALR_87013336 should
provide the ability to show the stock values of the BALANCE SHEET
accounts ands so it has to accumulate the values from period 0 to the
selected period. Furthermore, report S_ALR_87013336 shows only values
for balance sheet accounts.
Please also consider the attached note 180906 which explains the
different update logic for the periodic data transfer programs, namely,
1KEH, 1KEK, 1KEI and 1KEJ. I am sure your postings you mentioned have
been made by any of these periodical transfer programs.
So please consider the described update logic of the tables GLPCA (line
items) and GLPCT (totals table). So if you want to see the balance over
the periods 1 - 12 in TN KE5Z you only have to inout in the period
field in TN KE5Z 12 - 12 and NOT 0 - 12.
BR
Werner

Planned Value Problems

Hi everybody
hi everybody
I will
thank any help.
I have a Schedule with Resource
Labor and budget quantity distribuited in manual curve
resource (future period bucket), my baseline is definided
in this way too.
Now, i want show
in Activity Table:
Earned Value
Labor Units (BQWP),
Planned Value Labor Units
(BQWS), and
Actual Labor Units (AQ) 
and my problem is this:
my
activity BBB, have 66331 Man hours distribuited in 6
months in this way 17881, 12759, 12116, 11940, 7707,
3928.
So at finish of first month my Planned
Value is 17881 Man hours but P6 show 10993 same error in
Earned Value Report, but in Resource Spreadsheet the
Planned Value is 17881.
This
problem is in each activity of my schedule, the activities
are definides like fixed duration&units. and i try
solve this problem changing % complete type at Units,
Physical and Duration, without sucessfull. 
Then, how can set P6 for calculate
Planned Value from resource curve in my baseline? 
Regards,
Henry

Dear Friends,
I was trying to solve this
problem, and make a schedule with just one activity
with one resource assignment, and the problem is
same.
I make one activity with 100 Budgeted
units, duration 181 days, scheduled early start
July/01/08. I enter manually budgeted units by month
27, 19, 18, 18, 12, 6.
 Then:
1.- Created Baseline from copy
of this schedule
2.- Start activity on
July/01/08
3.- Run Data date on
July/31/08
this current
schedule have Planned Value units=17, I don´t know
what is wrong?
In WBS i set Earned Value
Tab, for caculate Earned Value by futupe period
Bucket.
in Summary, the Planned
Value Unit and Schedule % Complete are diferent of
Planned Value Expected in Baseline.
 I hope you can help me
 Best Regards
Henry

PS : Plan value query in Plan report S_ALR_87013533.

Dear PS Experts,
We are refering to a report T-Code : S_ALR_87013533 - Plan/Actual/Commitment/Rem.Plan/Assigned. For one of the WBS, we find some planned values.
We checked the following for Plan value research :
1. In CJ40/CJ41 : We find Plan values in the fields "Planned Total" against that WBS Element.
2. In CJR3 : No plan values inserted / uploaded. Meaning its all blank and there's no WBS having any Plan Values against any Cost Elements.
With the help of F1, on the field of "Planned Total" of CJ40/CJ41, I could find explanation & understand "Plan total is the annual or overall plan value including existing values from unit costing and cost element planning. In the cost planning of projects, the plan total also includes the plan total for all orders and networks assigned to the chosen WBS element and those subordinate to it."
Please help me to know :
1. If not CJ40 or CJR3, then from where do I am getting Plan values.
2. From where would I be able to find those line items (planned or actuals) reflecting in the

Hi,
I m just refering to report T-Code : S_ALR_87013533 - Plan/Actual/Commitment/Rem.Plan/Assigned. In that, for one of the WBS, we find some planned values.
Refering to CJ33, we observe that the :
1. Overall Budget is 985,000.00
2. Planned Total is 1,321,986.41
We checked CJ40 & CJR3 and have found that we havent uploaded any plan values (thru both the T-Codes), but still Plan Values Total shows as 1,321,986.41
Please help me to know : If not CJ40 or CJR3, then from where do I am getting Plan values.

Asset still showing planned value for closed fiscal year.

*We have a situation:- After we ran depreciation for Dec 2009, there was a credit memo posting done in the system for a particular asset. Now, the fiscal year has been closed for 2009 and 2010 is opened. Jan and Feb depreciation posting has been done for the asset for year 2010, but the credit memo posting is still stuck as planned value in the 12th period of 2009. How can we take care of that? I canu2019t run unplanned depreciation for 2009. Is there a better way to take care of this? I thought about opening year 2009 for the asset (ccode) and then running unplanned depreciation. Will that be a problem? If yes, what other solution can be proposed.*
*Appreciate the response.*

Hi,
If it is not possible to open the fiscal year because audit
has already been completed we have a workaround which is not quite
correct from the legal side ist thereport RACORR20_A from note 29694.
If in table ANLC there are differences between posted and planed
depr. the report simply makes: planed = posted.
The correct way would be:
-> Reopen your GL for FY 2008 via OB52.
-> Recalculate values (RAAFAR00)
-> RAPOST2000
-> RAPERB2000
-> RAJABS00
Regards Bernhard

Planned values of profit centers not showing up in customised report painte

Hi,
I made a customised profit center report via report painter. I have already uploaded planned values in KP06. In the customised report painter, the record type is "1" (plan) and version is "0" for actual/plan. The columns for the planned values do not show any figures. But when I generate std SAP report S_ALR_87013340 - Profit Center Group: Plan/Actual/Variance, it shows the plan values. In that way, I know that the cost center upload is correct.
Please advise on how to show the plan values on the report painter.
Thanks and best regards,
Thess

Hi,
ahhh...the fact that you can see the actual values has made me realize what the problem might be. GLPCP and GLPCA (actual line items) use different fields in regard to the period. I assume that you are utilizing the POPER characteristic to select the periods....correct?
In that case please try the following: copy library 8A3 into the customer name space (I would always base customized reports on your own library). In your copy activate the RPMAX characteristic. The re-create your report based on the new library and make the following changes: use RPMAX in the general selection and only use POPER in the column definition for the actual values. That should work.
Regards
Karl
P.S....hope you bear in mind that such a report is a potential performance nightmare.

Depreciation planned for wrong period

Dear All,
In Asset Master the depreciation is settle to start in 01.10.2010, I already run depreciations for all assets in period 10 but not for period 11.
I only acquired the asset after running depreciation for period 10, so in AFAB I have to run depreciation again for period 10 in "repeat" mode right?
Problem is...when I do that, the outcome is zero as if I didn´t make a new acquisition for that period, after that I went to asset explorer (AW01N) and in tab "Posted values" depreciations only starts in period 11.
Example (of what is shown in asset in AW01N):
Acquisition value: 1000 $
Acquisition date: 15.10.2010
Dep. start date: 01.10.2010 (period 10 already been run)
Planned values:
- period 11: 50 $
- period 12: 25 $
Why depreciation doesn´t starts in period 10? Instead period 11 "eats" values from period 10. I want to run again period 10 but it doesn´t have values. Can anyone tell me why this happens?
Thanks in advance,
MG.

Hi,
You can execute depreciation again for period 10 with repeat option.
Best Regards,
Madhu

Asset planned values computed positive value Issue

HI experts,
I have an existing asset problem where the planned depreciation values becomes positive. Why does it becomes positive? How does system calculates this planned values? We just did some adjustment to the Asset by Credit Memo and another Mark-up transaction. Sample:
Asset 1610600065
Planned Values - Transactions:
26.02.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85-     98,666.66     98,666.66     SGD
26.12.2010     98,666.66-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     43,851.85     98,666.66-     98,666.66-     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48-     93,333.33     93,333.33     SGD
26.12.2010     93,333.33-     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     41,481.48     93,333.33-     93,333.33-     SGD
26.02.2011     160,000.00     160     Credit memo in following year     64,000.00-     0.00     0.00     SGD
23.06.2011     160,000.00-     160     Credit memo in following year     60,000.00     0.00     0.00     SGD
26.12.2010     101,333.33     700     Write-up ordinary and spec     33,925.92-     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
                                                               26,074.08     101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
But the planned/posted value for this period is positive:
Status Status Period Amount
Green Posted     1     6,666.67-
Green Posted     2     6,666.66-
Green Posted     3     6,666.67-
Green Posted     4     6,666.67-
Green Posted     5     6,666.66-
Green Posted     6     6,370.37
YellowPlanned     7     4,493.83-
Posted Values - Depreciation Posted/Planned:
APC transactions     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Acquisition value     400,000.00     160,000.00-     240,000.00     SGD
Ordinary deprec.     220,000.00-     26,962.96-     246,962.96-     SGD
Unplanned dep.                    SGD
Write-ups          101,333.33     101,333.33     SGD
Value adjustment                    SGD
Revaluation ord.dep.                    SGD
Net book value     180,000.00     85,629.63-     94,370.37     SGD
Down payments                    SGD
Scrap value                    SGD

I believe in your case, the tremendous reduction in APC cost has caused a tremendous change in planned depreciation. System looks at the NBV and the remaining periods of useful life each time it calcs depreciation. Of course also looks at depreciation key, Period Control, and OAYR Smoothing button. Asset class can also be set for group depreciation.
If a credit memo reduced the APC value dramatically, then the amount of depreciation on the asset at that moment is more than enough so far. This means that the next running of the AFAB program will reduce its amount of depreciation from the amount it was planning to book since it already has an excess of accumulated depreciation.
Please check in OAYR to know if your Smoothing indicator has been checked for the Company Code. As I understand the system, if this indicator is checked - the system will not catch-up the whole difference in the next running of AFAB. Instead, it will smooth out the adjustments due to credit memos, unplanned depreciation, and changes in remaining useful life over the remaining life of the asset. When smoothing is set, one gets less drastic period to period change.
This setting should be in line with your accounting rules, such as in US GAAP changes in depreciable life are considered estimate changes requiring only prospective corrections, and so should smooth out impact over remaining periods of useful life versus immediate catch-up.
You may want to run a AFAR (check for recalc flags) and then a Repeat AFAB in the current period after making master data changes for depreciation. All open periods would be impacted by master data changes if you run AFAB.

Plan Values and Special Purpose Ledger, KP97

Hi, I have copied plan values using KP97 for respected versions. What do I need to do to get same values in Special Purpose Ledger (SPL)?
Thanks in advance for your time.
Regards,

Hi,
The link between CO-OM-planning and FI-SL-planning on the CO-OM-side is a flag in the plan version customizing (transaction OKEV):
You can activate the "plan integration" per version and year. Also there are some customizing on FI-SL-side to handle the business transactions and ledgers.
If the CO-OM-flag is active, the system tries to transfer the plan data to the ledger(s). During this transfer, the fiscal year variants of CO-OM and FI-SL are compared because FI-SL has to know where to put the values.
Refer note 433367 which is valid for ERP 2004 (& ERP 2005) which provides a modification if different variants are involved but the number of periods are the same.
regards
Waman

Budget planned values in period 13

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for