CJ8G Settlement Reverse Processing Type (CO forum)

Hi Gurus,
The following issue had been posted in the PS section without luck, maybe here can be answered.
When I reverse a settlement with a given selection variant I noticed that not only automatic settlements were reversed but partial capitalization as well, regardless whether during the reversal the "automatic" processing type was set. Is this normal? Can I set somewhere in the system that reversal will keep the settings in the processing type field?
Thanks in advance
g

Hi,
Please refer note 336557.
regards
Waman

Similar Messages

CJ8G Settlement Reverse Processing Type

Hi Gurus,
When I reverse a settlement with a given selection variant I noticed that not only automatic settlements were reversed but partial capitalization as well, regardless that when during the reversal the "automatic" processing type was set. Is this normal? Can I set somewhere in the system that reversal will keep the settings in the processing type field?
Thanks in advance
g

Hi,
Please refer note 336557.
regards
Waman

CJ88 Settlement Processing Type

Hi,
I would like to know the correct "Processing Type" to specify in Actual Settlement run (CJ88) for settling to Asset Under Construction (AUC) and Final Asset. Please confirm if it is correct to use "By Period" for settling to AUC and use "Full Settlement" to settle to Final Assets.
Thanks!
Vivian

we enter processing type in the intial screen of project settlement which controlls the settlement process.
With processing type By period : only distribution rules with settlement types to PER ( Periodic Settlement ), PRE( preliminary settlement ) & AUC ( Asset under settlement ) are taken in to account.
How ever settlement to AUC will happens at last. So, if with this sequence if you have maintained any settlement type PRE( Preliminary ) , it will consider it first & therefoe settle cost portions that are not to be capitalised.
If I say in the context of your question,
With the first settlement of WBs sys automaticallty generates a distribution rules for the settlement type AUC. If you don't want to settle all the cost of WBS to AUC, you must enter additional distribution rule for the debit to other receivers that are not to be capitalised. Use settlement type PRE ( Preliminary ) to ensure that these distribution rules are taken into account before the settlement to AUC.
Once the Assset under construction Phase is completed, create a completed asset. We does the same in Cj20n. next, define the distribution rules in the WBS element with settlement type FUL for the cost portion to be capitalised and enter the completed asset as receiver.
Not that distribution rule with settlement type FUL is only taken in to account in the project settlement if you ahve used Partial Capitalisation / automatic as the processing type
So, in short
when you want to settle to AUC use the distribution rules with settlement type AUC (generated by sys) & processing type periodic
when you want to settle to FXA you should use the settlement type Full & processing type partail capitalisation / automatic.
However the processing type Full settlement is used for the settlement rules with distribution rules of settlement type PER ( Periodic ) only, in to check weather the balance still exists in the object after the settlement due to debits to previous periods.
So, don't get confued with settlement type FUL (full settlement ) & processing type Full settlement. ( processing type full settlement has nothing to do with AUC )
Regards
Nitin
Edited by: Nitin Patoliya on Dec 12, 2008 9:43 AM

Processing Type in Settlement

Dear All,
Is there any idea about Processing Type in Settlement, Can u give some help on it.
Regards

Hi Raj,
The processing type in settlement is relevant for the type of processing you are going to do.
Typically they are Automatic, Partial capitlization, by period and Full settlement.
For Manufacturing orders you normally keep it as Automatic. When you keep "Automatic", system will automatically pick whether the periodic settlement or full settlement depending on the Order Type and the settlement profile settings.
In case of Internal Orders being used as investment orders where the capital expenditure is captured to Internal Orders and then settled to a fixed asset, in such case we need to specifically choose the settlement type whether it is partial capitalization or full.
Hope this gives a good understanding about the settlement type.
Please do let me know if you need futher details in this regard
Best Regards
Surya

Settlement reverse issue

Hi,
we have created one sales contract 141000, with out giving result analysis we have done settlement on the date of Aprial 2010 with the transaction code VA88, now we are going reverse the settlement with the transaction code VA88.
system it is showing below error message.
Reversal not possible; last settlement was in period 004 2010
Message no. KD547
Diagnosis
You can only reverse the last settlement carried out. This was in period 004 2010. This is not the same as period 005 2011 which you have entered.
Procedure
Check whether the settlement for the specified period can still be reversed, and correct your entry if necessary.
Please sujjest some solution.
Regards
Raju

Hi ,
The following can help you :
372630     Information: Reversal for settlement
359814     Info: Cannot reverse settlement reversal
140672     Info: Settle/reverse costs from previous per
To settle unsettled costs from previous years/periods without having
to reverse all periodic settlements, you could use a FUL rule. Please
read the F1 help for the field 'Processing Type' in the settlement
transaction (e.g. KO88). If a PER rule is used together with a FUL rule,
the system settles all costs which are posted in the settlement period
(=period entered in the settlement transaction) with the PER rule,
whereas all unsettled costs in previous periods (<settlement period)
will be settled with the FUL rule. This allows it to settle all
costs which have not been settled periodically before cumulated in the
settlement period. The credit posting is made in the settlement period
or, if entered, in the posting period (this must not be smaller than the
settlement period).
If a FUL rule is not desired and a previous period should be settled
with a PER rule, all settlements down to this previous period must be
reversed one by one.
Best regards,
Filipe Santos

Process Type - Delete overlapping requests from an Info Cube

I have read many threads on this topic, still have some questions. To give you background, I will be doing delta load (delta process chain). But before delta, I want to do setup initialization (init process chain). I want to use this process type in my init process chain to delete all data in my cube loaded from a specific ods. I cannot use delete all contents process type because many odss feed the same cube.
1.     Do you put this process type after Load Data or before Load Data. I have seen both cases in SDN forums.
2.     Variant of this process type is an info package. Does this info package have to be same as in load data step or it can be different.
3.     I want to delete all data in cube which was loaded from my ods. Term overlapping is confusing to me. Will this process type delete all data or not.
Tanks in advance.

Yes, you can do that. Goto RSPC - under process types Load Process and Post Processing, you will see DELETE OVERLAP REQUESTS FROM INFOCUBE option is there.
Select the proper check boxes like same sourcesystem, same datasource etc...
If it is one time deletion, why not do that manually?
Also check: How to delete most recent request in a Cube by using process chain
Hope it helps..

List of all the process types used in the creation of process chains

Hi Gurus,
I am new to process chains creation, can any one give the list of all the process types used in the creation of process chains and there uses also.
Please search the forum before posting a thread
Edited by: Pravender on Jan 4, 2011 4:18 PM

Hi,
As process chain is to automate the data load step.
For Ex:- If you are loading data from R/3 to DSO CUBE.
Here you require Info package to load till PSA.
DTP to load till DSO
Another DTP to load Cube.
And all other process like psa deletion AND process you can find in RSPC tab.
Thnaks,
Saveen Kumar

Settlement of Process order aginst the Sale Order

Dear friends
This the scenario with respect to product cost by sale order settlement profile. When I am settling the process order, which is created with reference to Sale order, system throwing an error "Define a settlement cost element for receiver type SDI".
When I see the explanation given by system, the following message displayed :
"Diagnosis
In allocation structure Z1 (controlling area RI01), you did not define which cost element should be used when settling costs/revenues of the sender. Nor did you define receiver type SDI.
Procedure
Assign a different allocation structure to the settlement sender (-> Master data -> Settlement rule -> Goto -> Settlement parameters), or maintain allocation structure Z1.""
For this I have defined one Secondary cost element and assigned to Allocation Structure under Settlement cost elements.
Still I am getting the error. What could be the reason?
Please do the needful.

Hi Kiran
In the Allocation Structure Z1, you need to define the Settlement cost element for the receiver category SDI. Have you done that? Cost element should be created with 21 Cost element category.
Dont Select By Cost element.
Regards,
Suraj

Node variable in query - Processing type customer exit?

We are on NW 2004S. I created a hierarchy for an info-object along with several nodes and child nodes.
I also created a node variable in a query for this info-object. I have the following questions with regards to using node variables in a query.
1) Can I use a node variable with processing type 'Customer Exit". My objective is to set the value of the node variable in the user exit.
2) If answer to first question is "Yes", how would I code the node value in the user-exit - Example code or some pointers to that effect.
I really appreciate your thoughts on this issue.
Thanks,
Sanjay

Hi Sanjay,
As far as I'm aware this hasn't changed in NW2004s, (in any case it still works), so:
1)Yes you can, no difference with other type variables.
2)In userexit EXIT_SAPLRRS0_001 (include ZXRSRU01).
There's different options depending on at which stage you want to change it:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw2004s/helpdata/en/f1/0a56f5e09411d2acb90000e829fbfe/frameset.htm
If you do a forum search on above technical names I think you'll find plenty of coding samples, but if you want something more specific, I'd be happy to help you out.
Regards,
Pieter

Reversing process or Subcontract Challan

Hi,
I want to know how to cancel the subcontrcat challn also in status of challna therte are reverse , cancel and delete what is exact diffrenece in all this i want to cancel my challan and also material docuemnt what is use of reverse process also in status there is also posted what is men by if status is posted as if we close it status is comleted .
regards,
zafar

Hi,
The process is like
SUB-CONTRACTING CONDITION RECORDS - FV11 for service tax and cess
SUB-CONTRACTING CONDITION RECORDS - ME21N
RELEASE STRATERGY FOR PURCHASE ORDER - ME28
TRANSFER POSTING OF CHILD PARTS TO SUB-CONTRACTOR - MB1B 541 Mvt Type
SUBCONTRACTING CHALLAN - J1ILN
GOODS RECIEPT - MIGO
RECONCILING SUBCONTRACTING CHALLAN - J1IFQ
INVOICE VERIFICATION - MIRO
For reversal Status C is for Completed. Go to J1IF11 and give Challan No and inside Try to Delete items.
Also try to Reverse the Subcontracting Challan in J1IF13.
Please go through below link is a little Explanatory in your case,
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_erp60_sp/helpdata/en/09/ebf138cdd78a4be10000000a114084/frameset.htm

Processing type in ko88

Hi Expert,
is there any standard setting to configure processing type in t-code KO88. e.g. disable one of options
Thanks
Rgds,

Hello Stephanie,
You can not change the processing type options. They are provided to cater to various requirements.
1. In Automatic all distribution rules for a sender are selected. If a sender only has distribution rules with the PER settlement type, then only the settlement period costs are selected and settled.If a sender has distribution rules with the the PER settlement type (PER rules), and distrubution rules with the FUL settlement type (FUL rules), then the PER rules are used first for the costs in the settlement period. If there are still costs left over, then the FUL rules are used.
A production order with a FUL rule to Material is only settled once it is technically completed, or completely delivered. Until then, however, "work in progress" can be transferred to financial accounting, if the WIP was calculated.
2. In Periodic all distribution rules with the settlement type PRE, PER and AUC are selected. The PER rules are applied first (except for investment measures).The PRE rules are applied first for investment measures, and then the remaining amount is settled with the automatically generated AUC rules to the asset under construction.
3. You use Partial Capitalization processing type to partially capitalize an investment measure that is not technically completed, so that a part of the total cost to complete assets is settled.
4. Full Settlement : use this type of processing if a sender only contains distribution rules with the PER settlement type, and if a balance check is to be made after settlement
Kind Regards // Shaubhik

Error in Including Roll Up Process Type into Process Chain

Dear Experts,
On BI 7.0, I found an error, when including the Roll Up Process Type into my process chain. The sequence of my first process chain looks like this.
Start -> Execute Infopackage -> Execute DTP to load data to DSO -> Delete Cube Index -> Execute DTP to load data to cube -> Create Cube Index -> Roll Up
I found this error when activating the process chain
'No type "Delete Index" process can be in front of process "Roll Up of Filled Aggregates/BIA Indexes" variable ROLLUP_ZHRF_C04
Then, after looking through the forum, I found someone suggest using 'Initial Fill' before 'Roll Up'. I followed his sugguestion, so my second process chain looks like this.
Start -> Execute Infopackage -> Execute DTP to load data to DSO -> Delete Cube Index -> Execute DTP to load data to cube -> Create Cube Index -> Initial Fill -> Roll Up
The same message is shown; however, this time it just a warning message instead of the error msg.
1) How can I solve this problem?
2) In which sequence of process types I should take for my process chain?
3) Must I always use the Initial Fill before the Roll Up in the process chain?

Hello,
This issue is with patch 16 of BI. The only solution i think is you need to create a local chain with start process -> rollup and include all the roll up cubes in that variant and include this local chain at the end of the main chain. Hope this helps.
REgds,
Shashank

System Command Process types!

Hi
What this process type(System Command) does??
Is it related to change the file read write acess or wat??
any idea..
10zin

Hi,
Please search the forum on the same for more info..
For ur reference:
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw70/helpdata/EN/35/6d6b3cfa58dd7de10000000a114084/frameset.htm
http://help.sap.com/saphelp_nw04/helpdata/en/b8/ec745009de3c418dc3f61dd44257d0/content.htm
Thanks
Hope this helps

Custom Process Type in PC - ABAP pgm that returns success/fail status

Hello All,
I need to create a custom process type so that an ABAP program can return success/failure message to its successor. browsing through the forum posts i came across some links to a How-To document. but that link doesnt seem to be valid anymore.
I dint get much idea looking into the IF_RSPC_* interfaces and CL_RSPC_ABAP class.
Please let me know if anybody has documentation on this topic. any help would be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rit

Hi,
you can goto 'rspc' and then settings->maintain process types. there you can define your possibilities/results.
i read somewhere in forum like for failure in abap just need to raise error message within abap routine.
hope it helps,
regards,
anil

Authorization in CJ88 by Processing type

Hello,
Our customer requires to split authorization roles for settlement processing by Processing type in CJ88. So, one group of users should be able to use only periodical settlement (automatic and by period), and another one only final (partly and final capitalization).
Does anybody know how to do it?
Thanks in advance!
DD

HI
One option is you can havetwo test user ids and test those requirements. Let you basis team starts the trace and find what are all objects it passes throgh during performing settlement run.
Hope that will work and discuss with your basis team.
Regards,
PSR

CJ8G Settlement Reverse Processing Type (CO forum)

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for