CO Order type in derivation rule

Hi,
I want to derive fund centers based on Plant Maintenance Order Type. But field 'Order Type' is not available in FM derivation rules. Can I add some user fields such as Order Type.
Regards
Manish

Hi Eli,
I tried the solution suggested by yourself. My problem is that i am not getting the target field 'Order Type' to assign the same to function module.
I can see Order type field in function module table fields but as i have to assign it to target fields as 'Order Type;, system does not give me option of 'Order Type' in drop down menu.
Regards

Similar Messages

Derivation Rule Problem - Sales Order

Hi Friends
I am SD consultant, i wrote this issue on SD forum also, but it is related to FICO.
Please send me solution with complete path.
When i create a new sals order and click enter, a small screen open and message displayed on it "Error occured in Derivation Rule, Seee long text"
And when try to save sales order in display incompletion log. When i press on edit to complete it message diaplay " Item 10 ... Missing data- Profitability Segment No.
When i press on complete data - Account Assignment screen open (Business Area 9900)
Would you please send me solution to fix this problem
If you can give your email address, i will send you screen shot of the problem.
Thanks
Rajesh
Email: [email protected]

Hi Waman
I ckeck the transaction code /nKEDR there which entry i should select and in type of prfatibity Which one i should select Costing based or Accounting based.
I tried on selecting IDEA and Accounting based and eleased but still i getting same error.
My problem is still pending, please send next step to solve this issue
Thanks
Raj
Email: [email protected]

Checking Rule to Order Types

Hai,
Can somebody let me know how the system automatically derives the Checking rule 'A' for Sales Orders. I would like to create new Availability Check Control based on the Checking Group / Checking Rule combination.
Mine is not an APO system, simple ECC 6.0, so I can't use the 'Business Transaction' field in the Document Type's Avail Check.
I don't want to choose 'A' as checking Rule for my Sales Order doc type.
Regards,
Maheshwaran. I

Hi Maheshwaran,
Availability check is carried out in different transactions like Sales order creation, delivery creation, Purchase order creation, goods issue and also in production order. The point to be noted here is everywhere the availability check is carried out using two basic elements.
1. Checking rule
2. Checking group
Explanation
Checking Rule
Checking rule is transaction based, i.e. In STD SAP system, if you are creating the sales order, then it is A, if delivery then it is B, if you are creating/releasing production order, then it is PP. This is almost fixed. What is the use of this as a single element it does not have any meaning, but with checking group.
Checking group
Checking group is the one what you assign in material master at plant level, i.e. for different plant and for the same material or for same plant different material there can be a different checking group. This is assigned in material master in MRP3 view, as a signal element it may not have much meaning except that it may be used for checking at which level - group level or individual level and quantities confirmed in the availability check are to be locked or not.
Combination of Checking rule and checking group will define the scope of check
In scope of check you will be defining all control parameters in t-code OVZ9
Checking group you have defined in MMR as 01 and system is checking with checking rule A as it is a sales order you have created
Hence the system takes the said combination
Checking rules are predefined in SAP.
Checking Rule A for Sale Order and B for Delivery is pre defined in SAP and based on the availability check what you maintain in material master, checking rule will react in sale order.
'A' refers to Sales Order and Availability check Rule determined in '01'.
Regards

Default rule in Order type dependend parameters - OPL8 - Order Settlement

Hello,
We are doing settlement of production orders via Tcode - Ko88.
After execution of the same, system is passing an FI entry to GL - which is mentioned in the Material Master (Valuation Class - 7900) i.e. through OBYC setting.
We have also checked the OPL8 setting (Order Type dependend Parameters - Controlling Tab) in which "Default Rule" is mentioned as - PP1 - Production Material full Settlement.
As the system is passing an entry via "Default Rule - PP1" stored in Order Type Dependend Paramenters:
1. What is the use of Settlement Profile (OKO7) & Allocation Structure (OKO6)?
2. Can we make "Default Rule" field as optional (In Tcode - OPL8) ? since all the settlements are resulting in same Material GL.
Waiting for a positive answer. Points will be assigned definitly.
Thanks & Regards,
Shridhar Sawant

Hi,
Settlement Profile:
In the settlement profile, you define a range of control parameters for settlement. You must define the settlement profile before you can enter a settlement rule for a sender.
If you want to settle the costs each time to just one cost center or just one G/L account, you need a settlement profile. As you cannot maintain the settlement parameters during settlement to a receiver, you must save the settlement profile either in the order type or in the model order or reference order.
Allocation Structure:
During settlement, costs incurred under the primary and secondary cost elements by a sender are allocated to one or more receivers. When you settle by cost element, you settle using the appropriate original cost element.
An allocation structure comprises one or several settlement assignments. An assignment shows which costs (origin: cost element groups from debit cost elements) are to be settled to which receiver type (for example, cost center, order, and so on).
You have two alternatives in settlement assignment:
You assign the debit cost element groups to a settlement cost element.
You settle by cost element - that is, the debit cost element is the settlement cost element.
This is a good idea, for example, if the required capital spending for an asset you are building yourself is to be monitored. These costs are settled by cost element to an inventory account in Asset Accounting at the end of the year, or when the measure is complete.
Each allocation structure must fulfil the following criteria:
Completeness
An allocation structure is assigned to each object to be settled. All cost elements in which costs are incurred, must be represented in the appropriate allocation structure.
Uniqueness
Each cost element in which costs are incurred may only appear once in an allocation structure. Only one settlement cost element may be assigned to a source within a particular allocation structure.
Source Structure:
A source structure contains several source assignments, each of which contains the individual cost elements or cost element intervals to be settled using the same distribution rules.
In the settlement rule for the sender you can define one distribution rule, in which you specify the distribution and receivers for the costs for each source assignment.
Thanks,
Rau

Automatic Rule Determination Based on Service Order Type

Hi Experts,
I have a requirement to determine the rule based on the custom service order type.
I have created 2 custom rules which are then assigned to 2 different org units as needed.
Now the thing is i want to avoid putting condition step if else based on various order types.
Is there any way by which i can directly determine which rule to be used by passing the Order type.
If there is any FM then please suggest and also how to use the same.
If no FM exists then is there a possibility of having only 1 if else condition and assign rule number in local container variables and pass it thought out the workflow to all the manual validation workitems. Please suggest how this can be achieved.
Thanks,
Jessica

Hi,
only 1 if else condition and assign rule number in local container variables and pass it
thought out the workflow to all the manual validation workitems
Create a workflow container element lets say with probably 15 characters length...
Now create a background step in which you determine the rule based on the order type.
data: lv_Rule(10) type c.
if order_type eq 'X'.
lv_Rule = '1234567890'.
else.
lv_Rule = '0123456789'.
endif.
" export the rule concatenated with 'AC' which indicates a rule...
concatenate 'AC' lv_rule into ev_rule. "ev_rule size may be lets say 15 characters.
condense ev_Rule.
"export the EV_RULE to workflow and store it in WF cotainer element.
In the step where you want to give the rule, select the Agent type as Expression and select the container element.
Hope this would solve your issue.
Regards
Narin

Process Order Settlement Rule by Order Type

Hi Experts
Our Client a requirement to have Process Order Settlement by Order Type please let me know how it can be achieved
In SAP a Process Order Variance is settled via the following Combination in OBYC :-
1 Chart of Accounts
2 Transaction PRD
3 Valuation Modifier
4 General Modifier
5 Valuation Class
6 GL Account
Can this account assignment based on the Order Type ?
Thanks
Suman

Dear Suman,
Normally, Order Types serves a different purpose. We can maintain default settlement rule, Costing Variants, Settlement Profiles, Number ranges etc at Order Type Level.
It is not possible to directly manage the Order Types in the Account Assignment in OBYC.
Thanks & Kind Regards
Umapathi G

Order type Z031 plant AT01. No checking rule mantained for operation

Hello PS Gurus,
I am trying to create a new element PEP, and when i tried to release the element PEP i get.
Order type Z031 plant AT01. No checking rule mantained for operation
Can someone tell me what is missing in our customization?
Best Regards
João Fernandes

I assume you are trying to attach materials to network activity which is assigned to WBS.
Your error is because of missing configuration in below mentioned node:
In SPRO maintain the 'Define Checking Control' under Project Systems->Material->Availability Check (T code OPJK)
For plant AT01 and Order Type Z031 maintain parameters which are suitable to you. Before this you need to check the node OPJJ.
Regards
Sreenivas
Pls close this post if satisfied.

Derivation Rule Problem - Sales Order -CHALLENGE TO ALL SD CONSULTANTS

Hi Friends
I am stuck on i very critical issue, i am not able to solve it, I am SD consultant, i wrote this issue on FI forum also, but i did not get complete solution, they write me back it is SD issue.
When i create a new sales order and click enter, a small screen open and message displayed on it "Error occurred in Derivation Rule, See long text"
And when try to save sales order in display incompletion log. When i press on edit to complete it message display " Item 10 ... Missing data- Profitability Segment No.
When i press on complete data - Account Assignment screen open (Business Area 9900)
Would you please send me solution with complete path to fix this problem
If you can give your email address, i will send you screen shot of the problem.
I have tried KEDR transaction issue also but nothing happened.
This is BIG challenge to all SD consultants now. Send me step by step solution
If you send my your email id, i will send actual error saved in word format.
Thanks
Rajesh
Email: [email protected]

Good luck!
to get a solution you need to provide the members of this forum with details regarding your PA set-up.
PA is normally very customer driven, so not standard.
Without information regarding your structure there you will not get any solution.
GL
Hein

Derivation Rule from Sales order (VBPA) Urgent!!

Hi Gurus,
I've maintained a derivation rule for pulling the sales agent ( Partner Function) from sales order (VBPA Table lookup).
When I tested the derivation strategy, its pulling the sales agent from sales order, but when the sales agent characteristic is added to the report and even after realigning the data, it still says "not assigned".
Any input is really appreciated.
Points will be awarded.
Shiva.

Hi
Check the sequence of order (your derivation) try to move up your derivation on top of the other existing derivation from where same logic is executing (not assigned)
Regards
Laxmiprasad

Internal Order is not reading from Asset master through derivation Rule

Hi,
I entered Functional Module to read Asset Master data in derivation Rule. While procuring an Asset after selecting an asset the fund center, fund are coming automatically but Internal Order and Cost center is not picking automatically.
It has to pick Internal Order automatically from Asset master data.
Please guide me.
Regards,
Sree

Hi,
Internal order should come from the asset master data, with no connection to derivation strategy in FM. Regarding the cost centre, it's irrelevant when you purchase to an asset.
Regards,
Eli

Error in derivation rule when posting vendor's invoice against int. order

Hi all,
I am trying to post an invoice using FB60 against an internal order. I get the message 'Errror in derivation rule' (ABADR01). The long message states 'No entry in a derivation rule was found for the specified source fields.'.
Why do I see this message, and what can I do to correct the situation?
Any help is appreciated..
Paul

Hi,
It's a message from CO-PA. It means that the system could not derive the characteristics from the source field of the original document. You have to check the integrity of your rules in KEDR transaction.
Regards,
Eli

Profit center derivation rule

HI
We need to maintain the profit center derivation rule in the delivery or billing document, i.e. if batch no starts as A- Profit center-1000, B -Profit center-2000. We have used some user exit in order and working fine. where as our client is interested to have same in delivery or billing document. Is there any user exits are available. The profit center should be determined as per batch no starts and not as maintained in the material master.
Regards.
Edited by: R Rao on Sep 22, 2008 4:03 PM

Please check this user exits available for VF01.
SDVFX007 User exit: Billing plan during transfer to Accounting
SDVFX008 User exit: Processing of transfer structures SD-FI
SDVFX009 Billing doc. processing KIDONO (payment reference number)
SDVFX010 User exit item table for the customer lines
SDVFX011 Userexit for the komkcv- and kompcv-structures
V05I0001 User exits for billing index
V05N0001 User Exits for Printing Billing Docs. using POR Procedure
V60A0001 Customer functions in the billing document
V60P0001 Data provision for additional fields for display in lists
V61A0001 Customer enhancement: Pricing
Also check this user exits as well.
USEREXIT_NUMBER_RANGE (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZZ)
The internal number range used in the standard system is specified in the billing type table and can be changed in this user exit. This user exit is only called when the billing documents is created.
USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMKCV (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZZ)
In this user exit additional fields for account determination that are not provided in the standard system are copied into communication structure KOMKCV (header fields).
USEREXIT_ACCOUNT_PREP_KOMPCV (Module pool SAPLV60A)
In this user exit additional fields for account determination that are not provided in the standard system are copied into communication structure KOMPCV (item fields).
USEREXIT_FILL_VBRK_VBRP (Module pool SAPLV60A, program RV60AFZC)
This user exit is only called when the billing document is created. It is used to provide the header and the item of the new billing document with deviating or additional data.

Derivation rule at asset retirement

Hii experts,
we have requirement of assets procurement through grants they receive. Funds of fund center got consumed at the asset acquisition but when i m triyng to retire/scrap assets... its giving an error for FI313 I.e
No funds center entered/derived in item 00001 (1000/2000000122/)
I came to know that we need to prepare some derivation rule of the retirement of assets to resolve the issue.. Please guide me as i am very new to grant management...
Regards,
Abhay

Dear Abhay,
Since you have created Asset Codes in Asset Master, you have to provide Asset Codes in Asset Retirement Derivation Rule, so that system can derive proper values as per your derivate rule. You have to maintain the following derivation rule for Asset Retirement:
Transaction Type (TT)+Asset Code (To-From)+Document Type(DT)=Target Commitment Item
Mention all the Asset Code number ranges maintained in the system, while Document Type AA will be used for TT 200 (Retirement without Revenue) and Document Type DR will be used for TT 210 (Retirement with Revenue). You can derive statistical or dummy commitment item (60 and 3) for processing of transaction.
Further, you can also add cost centre as source field to derive funds centre. Also make sure you keep the rule in the logical order, since it may affect the derivation of fields. Also check note 666322 to make use of trace feature to ensure proper derivation of values.
I hope this will resolve the issue.
Regards,
Amar Lal

Derivation rule for service agreement

Dear Gurus,
I have derivation rules between GL-commitment item and Cost center - Fund center. now when i create PR & standard PO for type "cost center" the system is working properly by derives fund center and commitment item automatically but when i create service agreement the system doesn't derive fund center and commitment item. If anyone have any suggestions, please let me know.

Are there any conditions to the derivation rule?
In my QA system, I was able to create a derivation rule GL=Committment item. It worked the first time I created a scheduling agreement using ME31L.
Then I went into the "conditon" tab of the derivation rule and entered business transaction=RMBA and RMBE (purchase requisition and purchase order respectively) and the derivation rule did not work when i created another scheduling agreement.
Other than some conditions exist or the target field attribute is needed to be set to overwrite. I am at a loss to what the problem could be.

COPA-Offset Derivation Rules

Hi
Pls let me know how to create offset derivation rules in COPA
Thanks

Hi Deepthi ,
The best way to find out is to check the characteristics in both the release orders seperately ..
Go to Transaction KE21S ( Select Record Type F , Point of Valuation 1) and simulate the characteristics derivation for both the orders seperately ..
. For simulation .. enetr parameters like order no , company code , plant .. etc and click on derivation .. System will derive the sales mode .. for both the orders . You will be able to find out the differences in characteristics .. which is causing the issue ..
Instead of KE21S .. you can also use transaction KEDR . In KEDR screen , enter (F8) or click on test icon and simulate the characteristics derivation..
Hope this will solve your issue .. Please revert back for any further clarifications..
Regards
Sarada

CO Order type in derivation rule

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for