Collective work confiramtion in Planning board

Hi all
i want to collective confirmation of  activities in Plnning board. in planning board i wl enter %duration one by one against each activity.
regards

Hi,
The collective confirmation is not available in PPB.  You can use CN27.
But if you want to do it thru PPB, then----
In PPB---> Edit >Select-> Activities
Then GOTO---> Confirm Activities
Here you can enter %duration one by one against each activity.
Regards,

Similar Messages

  • MRS 700 planning board alternative working schedule

    Hi MRS-colleagues,
    There is a button in the planning board "alternative working schedule. If I highlight one resource, Ican define an alternative working schedule for this resource, based on a period HR-subtype and daily working schedule.
    My question is, if you assign this alternative working schedule to a resource, then the display and calculation of the availibility will be changed for the respective period. A business case for this could be, that you have to schedule more work to a technician than his availibility allows. The benefit compared to a attendance time allocation is, that you can create a daily work schdule and assign it for a period instead of creating attendances manually. Is that correct?
    Do you have guuys have some practical cases, where this functionality is used? Are there any "bad consequences" of the usage and can I just use it permanently and then remove the "transfer availiblity" tag from the HR Transfer report?
    BR
    Olaf

    Hi,
    As you said the purpose of alernative workschedule and the HR report are same. There are no impacts if you use this button. Apart from the actual workschedule if you want to assign some more work to a technician you can do through this. This will not greyed out the planningboard for that period. on the top of availability in the gantt chart, it will be appear as a bar to identify the type of work you has assigned.
    Regards
    Satish

  • MRS (Multi Resource Scheduling) - Show operation status in Planning Board

    Because the current MRS thread is some long and complicated I chose to move this question into a seperate thread:
    Initial question:
    Like many companies, it is not unusual at my customer for their Planners to create orders with multiple operations, particularly since many orders require different crafts to perform the work. When the Planning Board is launched and Planners lok at work scheduled for the past week they want to be able to see at a glance which operations have been completed and which operations, perhaps from the same order, have not and may need to be rescheduled. Their preference is to select "final confirmation" when using transaction IW41 and thereby set the operation system status to CNF when the work on an operation has been completed. They then want to somehow use this CNF operation status to drive something visual in the graphical Demand layout display and Resource layout display to enable the Planner to see at a glance that the operation has been completed. I've tried several approaches with configuration of abstract statuses and the user interface profile without success. My customer's interest in being able to see the completion status of an operation in the MRS Planning Board makes a lot of sense to me. I'm hoping someone can help me with a technique for modifying the Planning Board so that it displays the completion status of an operation in a visual way.
    Response from Varun Verma:
    Hi Mark,
    The problem at your customers end is nothing new.
    What you can do ( many other customers have done it in similar way ) is:
    1) you integrate the status CNF into MRS.
    Check the customizing: Basic Settings -> Assign ERP Objects -> Status
    2) configure in MRS that for status CNF, the assignments and demands (only in item work list or Hotlist) is colored to GREEN (or any other color)
    Check customizing: Set Up Scheduler Workplace -> Workplace Profiles -> Define User Interface Profiles
    Thus the users will know visually, that the green colored assignments are already completed.
    By the way, in your work list you can also filter the demands based on their status
    Regards
    Varun.
    Followup question:
    Varun,
    Thanks for the response.  I thought I had tried this but perhaps it's because in the UI profile I had not entered something in both the status groups for assignments and the status groups for demands.  I have a bit more testing to do but it appears that the demand status now gets updated from the operation status of PCNF (linked to abstract status WORK_START) and CNF (linked to abstract status WORK_STOP).  I also get a red bar (C4) for PCNF and a green bar (C1) for CNF.  Do you have a better status group I should be using in place of C1 and C4?  Status groups C1 and C4 give me a bar but it doesn't look like the demand bar with a outline and alphanumeric description of the demand, it's just a colored bar.
    I know the work list can be filtered based on their MRS "planning" status, however, it doesn't appear to permit filtering by the status of the operation unless I add the operation status as an additional field in the worklist.  Is there something I'm missing here?  And even if it did, my customer wants to be able to see the CNF status indication in the Demand layout and schedule using the work centers so the worklist is not being shown like it is in the Resource layout.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 10, 2009 3:35 PM

    Hi Mark,
    Well I assumed that you have confirmations integration active !! But I guess not because you say that the status is not integrated always.
    What you need to do:
    1) I assume you have SP05 or later.
    2) Implement the user exit: CONFPM05. In the implementation of this exit you need to call FM: /MRSS/RSG_PM_ORDER_CONFIRM
    3) Go to customizing: Basic Settings --> Assign ERP Objects --> Status
      -- Here, define an abstract status (MRS Status) for confirmed and partially confirmed
      -- map it to R3 status CNF and PCNF.
    After this, whenever you enter confirmation for PM order from transaction IW41, the status will be integrated.
    Now you can use the MRS statuses defined in step 3 to configure the colors.
    Implementing the user exit CONFPM05 might require some technical input. But it is easy. Just a few double clicks and copy paste.
    Contact an ABAP developer for the same.
    This should solve your issue.
    Regards
    Varun

  • Closing Collections Work Items based on FI-CA Transactions

    Hello Colleagues,
    We have a requirement to close Collections Work Items when certain transactions are performed, e.g. Creation of Instalment Plan, Write-off, Payments to name just a few.
    Because some of  these items involve clearings,  Dunning  will not be triggered for the cleared items. Therefore I assume the Dunning BRF configuration cannot be used to close the Work items.
    Is the  only way to close work items when these FICA transactions are performed is by coding FICA Event logic that is specific to each of the transactions? (e.g. use a Write-Off Event to close work items when items are written off, an Installment Plan Event  when Installment Plan is created, and so on? )
    Your insights will be very helpful.
    Thanks in advance,
    Ivor Martin

    Thanks Bill.
    I understand and agree with  the expectation gap about Instalment Plans.
    Some good news on clearing of dunned items:
    We did some more testing after un-checking the  "Enforcement" Work item in the Work item category configuration.
    Now the work item is closed when the document that is in dunning is cleared (i.e. via payments, write-offs, reversals, acct maintence, etc). The Work item Status turns to "G" (closed due to incoming payment).
    I have logged an OSS in regards to the Instalment Plan on the request of my client - I would  be surprised if they send us a fix to close the work item upon creation of an Instalment Plan. I think we will end up coding our work item closing logic in FI-CA Event 3040 (after the Instalment Plan is created).
    Regards,
    Ivor

  • Follow up to MRSS planning board how to populate

    Thanks for teh reply Varun. It was correct as I did not knwo that the create/save populate teh planning board data via the BADi.
    However 3 of the 4 added fields TPLNR, ABCKZ,  and ILARTa re being populated in the Order Change (IW32) transaction but the field called Remaining Work field OFMNW_2 is not. It is generally calculated when teh actual work in teh IW41 confirmation is changed to less than planned. I.E. if the planned work was 8 and the operator puts 4 in actual work, then the IW41 screen shows remeaining work field filled in with the difference (4).
    How can I populate this field via the BADi implementation PUSH_TO_MRS method.  I tried to link the user exit for confirmation save (Enhancement CONFPM05, user exit EXIT_SAPLCORF_005 INCLUDE ZXCOFU05) to then invoke the instance of the class method call in the user exit after saving the remaing work field in an EXPORT to MEMORY ID:
    Here is the code in the user exit that then fires off the BADI implementaion method PUSH_TO_MRS
    read table AFRUD_TAB index 1.
    EXPORT AFRUD_TAB-ISMNW to memory id 'z_OFMNW'.
    data z_ZCL_IM_MRSS_RSG_PM_INT type ref to ZCL_IM_MRSS_RSG_PM_INT.
    data zheader type BAPI_ALM_ORDER_HEADER_E.
    data wa_zCT_INFO type line of /MRSS/T_DEM_INFO_EXT_TAB.
    DATA: Z_DEM_H type /MRSS/T_DEM_H_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_ADM type /MRSS/T_DEM_ADM_WRK_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_PLR type /MRSS/T_DEM_PLR_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_PLRS type /MRSS/T_DEM_PLRS_EXT_TAB,
       zCT_INFO type /MRSS/T_DEM_INFO_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_TOOL type /MRSS/T_DEM_TOOL_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_RELAT type /MRSS/T_DEM_RELAT_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_QUALIF type /MRSS/T_QUALIF_REQ_DEM_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_ASSIGNMENT type /MRSS/T_***_KEY_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_STATUS type /MRSS/T_DEM_STATUS_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_PARTNER type /MRSS/T_DEM_PARTNER_EXT_TAB,
          zCT_OPERATIONS type /MRSS/T_DEM_OPERATION_TAB.
                                                                                    create object z_ZCL_IM_MRSS_RSG_PM_INT.
    z_zcl_im_mrss_rsg_pm_int->/mrss/if_ex_rsg_pm_int~push_to_mrs(
       EXPORTING
         is_header     = zheader
       changing
         ct_dem_h      = Z_DEM_H
         ct_adm        = zCT_ADM
         ct_plr        = zCT_PLR
         ct_plrs       = zCT_PLRS
         ct_info       = zCT_INFO
         ct_tool       = zCT_TOOL
         ct_relat      = zCT_RELAT
         ct_qualif     = zCT_QUALIF
         ct_assignment = zCT_ASSIGNMENT
         ct_status     = zCT_STATUS
         ct_partner    =  zCT_PARTNER
         ct_operations = zCT_OPERATIONS
      EXCEPTIONS
        failed        = 1
        others        = 2
    IF sy-subrc <> 0.
    MESSAGE ID SY-MSGID TYPE SY-MSGTY NUMBER SY-MSGNO
                WITH SY-MSGV1 SY-MSGV2 SY-MSGV3 SY-MSGV4.
    ENDIF.
                                                                                    ENDIF.

    Hi Stephen...
    I think you are going wrong...
    From you post I understand that:
    1) You have implemented the user exit EXIT_SAPLCORF_005.
    Note: This is called when you enter the confirmation in IW41.
    2) Your understanding here is right that you need to integrate this information into MRS and you can do it from the above user exit.
    3) But you are wrong -- if you call the BADI here.
    Note: BADI methods will not work if you call them arbitrarily anywhere !! They work only when called in a specified program flow.
    The given BADI is called during the forward integration -- meaning when the order is saved. After the BADI is called MRS save is called and the data is saved in MRS.
    Calling the BADI method alone has not effect.
    I suggest that you read more information about BADIs and User Exits.
    Regards
    Varun.

  • Ability to display multiple texts within graphic planning board Gantt chart

    I have been unable to change the planning board Bar Chart Graphic Profile (OPG0 and OPG9) to be able to display both material text and a user field within the Gantt chart graphic.  I have copied the SAPSFCG011 profile and created my own.  The profile is displayed below from CMCH.
    Overall prof: ZBWSFCG011           SFC: View work center/capacity (3 graf.)
    ...... Select.profile:                     ZBWSFCS001      SFC: View work center -> cap.(3 graf.)
    ...... Control profile:                    ZBW___C002      Gen: Planning table
    ...... Time prof:                           ZBW___Z002      Gen: Medium-term (3 months)
    ...... Evaluation prof.:                 ZBW___A001      Gen: Standard evaluation profile
    ...... Strategy prof.:                    ZBW___T001      Finite scheduling forw./all functs.activ
    ...... Capacity planning table:      ZBWSFCL010      SFC: only main cap. (3 graf.)
    .......... Graphics profile                      ZBW___X002      BARC    1  Default profile 2 Capa. planning board
    .......... Chart sequence                      ZBWSFCT002      SFC: Main caps. (3 graph.)
    .......... Layout ID                                 ZBWSFCLA10      SFC: Work center view     (graphical)
    .......... LineRepresSelection                 ZBW___ZR02      SAP standard 2
    .......... Scale time axis                         SAP___M031      Stand. weekly per. split rough
    .......... Graph.object.select.                ZBW___OA02      Pool group order path
    .............. DStat Sq Structur Field na ROp Comparison val NStat Struct
    .............. 00000 01 KBED     TYPKZ    NE  1                      00001
    .............. 00000 02 AFVG     OBJNR    ST  SAP005         00000 SAP002 Standard operation partially confirmed
    .............. 00000 03 AFVG     OBJNR    ST  SAP006         00000 SAP003 Standard operation completely confirmed
    .............. 00000 99                   DEF                                  00000 ZJB000 Standard operation
    ................... Graphical object type               ZJB000          Standard operation
    ........................ Form type                           22              Plan. board:Graphic obj. w. ordNo matTxt
    ........................... Form group                          ZBW001
    ............................... Form definition                     PLTO22          Planning board graphic order and mat.txt
    .................................. Layout definition                   [[$a//$b]]
    .................................. Layout definition
    .................................. Layout definition
    .................................. Layout definition
    In addition to the profile change, I have configured the graphical object type ZJB000 (in OPG9) to look as follows:
    0     AFKO     Order header                          MATXT     Material description                                                                     
    2     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SSTAD     Latest start / date     SSTAU     Latest start / time
    3     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SSSBD     Latest scheduled start: Processing (date)     SSSBZ     Latest scheduled start: Processing (time)
    4     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SSSAD     Latest scheduled start: Teardown (date)     SSSAZ     Latest scheduled start: Teardown (time)
    5     KBED     Capacity requirements     A     SENDD     Latest finish / date     SENDU     Latest finish / time
    6       AFVG    Order operation                       USR08    User field for date                                                                               
    I have found that the 2nd text field (USR08) must be added as the last step (#6).  When I had it as #1, the planning board did not display the USR08 value.
    Now both are displayed in the Gantt chart graphic.  However, it is difficult to see this long string of data as the bars in the Gantt chart may not be long enough to display the data. 
    Therefore we would like to use the "hover over" text which is displayed in the status line at the bottom of the screen.  We have tried using both the Info Text and the Quick Info options within the Bar Chart: Options Profile (OPG0).  Only the first text (the material descirption) is dislayed within either the Quick Info or the Info Text.
    Is it possible to have multiple object values appear in Quick Info or Info Text?  Or is it possible to control which text is displayed in the Quick Info or Info Text?
    Any help in this area would be greatly appreciated, as this is a make-or-break issue for the business to use the planning board.  Thank you!

    I'm also looking for a standard customizing alternative to do the same thing.
    Still, if you're interested, I've already done it successfully with user exit PLAT0001.
    Hope this helps.
    Best regards.

  • CM25 planning board

    Dear experts,
    I have been working on the CM25 graphic planning board. So far I have not been able to show if a production order is scheduled to be finished in time.
    Do you know if it is possible to show this somehow?
    I am thinking in two directions:
    1) The planning and scheduling log gives a warning message if the "scheduled finish date" differs from the "basic finish date" (also when it is produced too early). Can I change the settings of the scheduling and planning log?
    2) I know how to link different colors in the planning board depending on a user status. Is it possible to determine a status which compares the "scheduled finish date" and "basic finish date"?
    Are there any other solutions?
    Will definitely reward points!!!
    Regards,
    Tim

    Dear Rachael,
    One thing I learned is that CM25 is full of surprises. In the end I did manage to compare the "basic date" and "scheduled date" and assign different colors to them. Our customer requirements are converted via MRP which calculates the basic dates of our planned orders. As long as the basic dates are correct, the colors of the planning board will indicate if an order is still on time or not.
    The problem is that if a planned order is firmed or if a production order is created the basic dates will no longer change even if the customer requirements change...
    It turns out that we will be able to use this solution for our client, but I did not find a real solution to compare production with the customer requirements.
    If you need more info, please come back.
    Regards,
    Tim

  • MRS: PRT Tool Resource does not appear in Planning Board

    Hi Experts,
    I am trying to perform tool assignment but somehow the tool resource does not appear in the planning board.  I have the following set up:
    - Tool created as both material and Equipment (category P)
    - Equipment assigned to work center linked to Org Unit
    - Order with operations created with PRT assigned
    What I am seeing in the planning board:
    - I can see the operation with the linked PRT
    - I can see the HR resource under the same work center Org Unit
    - However, I cannot see the Tool resource.
    Am I missing somethng here?  Any kind of pointers would be greatly appreciated.
    Thank you in advance,
    Jk

    Thank you for your response, Varun.
    I do have the equipment work center set to be the same as the operation work center.  Also, when I try to add the PRT manually in the planning board, I get 2 error messages:
    "Resource  is not available"
    "Selected equipment 0 is invalid"
    Have you encountered this before?
    Thank and Regards,
    jk

  • MRS (Multi Resource Scheduling) - Manager Planning Board

    My understanding of the MRS Manager Planning Board is that it will only display those orders that have operations that have been assigned to a resource.  If true, this would mean that the Manager Planning Board would be of little value to an organzation that is only using MRS to schedule to a work center because there would be no demand that had been assigned to a resource.  It would only start to be of some value once the organization began to assign demands to resources.  Is this correct? Or, do you see other value in the Manager Planning Board for an organization that is only scheduling to a work center?
    I've also found that when I run the Manager Planning Board that the resources are displayed, however, I have to hit "refresh" in the Planning Board to get the orders/operations (demand) to display.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 1:15 PM

    Hi Mark,
    As you already figured out correctly that the Manager planning board displays the resources (in display mode). It displays all the information about the resource: Its availability and assignments. since assignments are displayed, obviously the (related) demands are also displayed.
    If the fine grained planning ( planning at resource level ) does not happen, then obviously it does not make sense to use the manager planning board transaction.
    PS: As the name suggests this transaction is for managers who are not authorized to change anything but only for display. So they will see the resource availability and assignments in this transaction.
    Regards
    Varun

  • MRS (Multi Resource Scheduling) - Displaying Planning Board

    I've gotten the MRS planning board to function the way I want it in my sandbox, for example, when I run /MRSS/PLBOTIME the all the resources show up that are in the planning node the resource planner is assigned to and all subordinate resource nodes.  Also, the demand shows up.  I thought life was good.  I've now moved to my development box and configured the system the same as sandbox (to the best of my knowledge). 
    Now when I run /MRSS/PLBOTIME:
    1.  I get a popup window telling me that there are several valid resource planning nodes and requiring me to select one.
    2.  While the resources show up the demand does not.
    Now when I run /MRSS/PLBOSRV:
    1.  The demands I selected show up but none of the resources do.
    As I mentioned above, to the best of my knowledge, the MRS configuration is the same between the two boxes (e.g.,  work center types properly assigned, resource planning nodes and evaluation paths as delivered, user interface profiles, /MRSS/SGE_PN_MNT, etc.).  I can't figure out why the popup window is now showing up asking me to select a resource plannng node and, more importantly, why in one case the resources show up but not the demand and in the other the demand shows up but not the resources.  The only way I can now get both demand and resources to show up in the planning board is by running /MRSS/PLBOORGSRV.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 13, 2009 8:58 AM

    Thanks for the response:
    /MRSS/PLBOTIME -->
    1.  What I had seen before in two other systems is that the org.units that are associated with me as the Resource Planner would show up, as well as all other subordinate org.units, both resources and demands.  In this system what I see is that the demands associated with  subordinate org.units are not showing up, only the resources.  I went into another system I have access to in order to confirm what I had been seeing.
    2.  Also, when launching the Planning Board using this transaction in other systems I had never seen a window pop up telling me there were "several valid resource planning nodes" and asking me to pick an org.unit from the list, it always just gave me the org.unit I was associated with plus any subordinate ones.  (We upgraded to SP06 last night and this morning this window didn't pop up, instead it gave me the resources and demand for the org.unit I am the Resource Planner for, as well as those for subordinate org.units....weird.)
    /MRSS/PLBOSRV --> Logical as you described is what I expected, however, what I was seeing was that the resources associated with the demands were not showing up.  After a closer look what appears to be happening is that the selected demands are being brought into the Planning Board but no resources unless the resource has previously been assigned to the demand.  In other words, resources associated with the work centers used in the operations (and their linked org.units) are not showing up in this Planning Board, they only show up if they had previously been assigned to a demand.  I can, of course, manually bring in resources once I'm in this Planning Board.  Is this what you meant?
    /MRSS/PLBOORD --> I followed your logic of "if I am responsible for the parent org.unit then I am responsible for the lower org.units also".  However, the logic escapes me as to why this only applies to resources and not demand.  Regardless, as long as I know that's how it works then I can deal with it.
    Mark
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 9:57 AM
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 6:18 PM
    Edited by: Mark Scott on Aug 18, 2009 6:25 PM

  • Error while transporting Planning board profiles from Dev to QA

    Hi All,
    I have created planning board profile by copying an already existing Non-Standard profile.
    The Profile is working fine in Dev and i am able to see all the charts and Graphical objects as per the settings in the profile.
    But when i transport the profile to QA, it is giving error SAPBARC with text "Illegal number of columns in Chart". I checked what setting have been transported, and found that many of the setting have not been transported for the profile.
    Also tried to move all the profiles, thinking, there might be some dependcy among them. But the problem still persists.
    Awaiting for help...
    Thanks in advance..:).

    Hi Davis,
    Before transporting transformation make sure either of source or target should availble in target system.
    suppose you have a transformation between Data source and Data Target, first transport Data source, then transport Transformation along with data target.
    Before tansporting Transformation either source or target should be avaialble in QA system..then only transportation will happen smoothly..
    Hope this helps.
    regards
    SK

  • WBS in Planning Board

    Dear All,
    Need help in understanding how and when will the % duration of work which we get while confirming an acitivty will show up in higher WBS.
    Eg.
           WBS level 1                                   % duration of work doesnt show up (no time bar visible)
                               WBS level 2               % duration of work - doesnt show up (only actual time bar visible)
                               Activity 1                    % duration of work 20- visible in plan board
                               Activity 2                    % duration of work 20- visible in plan board
    Requirement at higher WBS it should show % duration of work as it shows in Microsoft project.
    Please Help
    Regards,
    Farhan

    Dear venkat,
    My problem is not solved can i send you the screen shot so that you can guide me .
    If yes please get me your ID.
    Regards,
    Farhan

  • MRS - Resources and demands are not visible in the Planning Board

    Hi Friends - I am working on the the MRSS 610. We have installed it on the our ECC 6.0 as an add-on. We have configured the system as per the configuration guide.
    But when I am accessing Manageru2019s Planning Board -  /MRSS/PLBOMGR , using the Organization unit, I am getting Notification saying that the resources assigned to the Organization unit are not available in the MRS.
    "Resource 00000000010000000000000000000000 not yet created in the WFM Core"
    The details of the Error message
    "Resource 00000000010000000000000000000000 not yet created in the WFM Core
    Message no. /MRSS/SGE034
    Diagnosis
    Resource 00000000010000000000000000000000 has not yet been created in MRS.
    System Response
    No assignments have been created for resource 00000000010000000000000000000000, even though, according to the organizational model, this resource is to be taken into consideration in the planning board.
    Procedure
    Contact technical support.
    Procedure for System Administration
    Create the resource in question in MRS."
    I have run the Report
    /MRSS/HCM_RPTWFMIF : Transfers the HR data (availability times, qualifications and the resources itself) into the MRS Basis
    But even after that I am not getting the resources in the planning board.
    Also I am not able to view the Demands from PM/CS orders.
    I have created PM Orders and
    Assigned Work centres to the operations and
    assigned the Resources to the Operations.
    The HR assignment to the work center is also done.
    I have tried T Code   /MRSS/PLBOSRV - Enter the MRS planning board using a specified order
    to pull the order demand. But it is not working
    Its giving following message
    1004280 is not a valid demand
    Message no. /MRSS/SGU139
    Diagnosis
    The order does not exist in MRS.
    This may be because:
    The order number has an invalid format.
    The order does not exist.
    The order is not relevant for planning and has therefore not been transferred to MRS.
    The order has been deleted from MRS.
    Pls help me on this.
    Thanks in advance and warm regards
    Purnendu

    Hi Anil/Saurabh - Thanks a lot for your replies.
    I have checked the MRS configuration as per your suggestion.
    It looks fine as per the configuration guide. I have done the PM/CS integration for Orders as demand.
    But the Demands are not visible on the Planning Board.
    I have checked in the debugging mode what is causing the problem - It looks like
    "The Database Table: /mrss/d_dem_h  needs entry"
    But there are no entries in this table.
    I could not find any Customizing transactions or Application transactions for maintaining this table. This is an Application Table for Master and Transaction Data and its Display and Maintenance allowed with Restriction.
    I could not also find any transaction for transferring Demand from ECC(R/3) to MRS.
    How do I maintain entries in this table?
    How do I transfer Demand from ECC to MRS?
    Saurabh - I have also been not able to transfer HR Resources from ECC to MRS.
    We don't have WFM Core installed in our instance. But MRS should work fine without WFM. MRS Basis should take care of it.
    To transfer Employee resources i have run the Program " /MRSS/HCM_RPTWFMIF". But when I execute the transaction with the selection parameters system shows that it is processing (Clock at the bottom Status bar) but it does not shows any result or status.
    So I am not sure whether it is executing the program properly.
    Pls help me resolve these issues.
    Thanks and warm regards
    Purnendu

  • Scheduling comparision in Gantt Chart- Project planning board

    Hi All,
    I Need to use the "Scheduling comparision" in Project planning board gantt chart. This is to compare the original status of activities before and after scheduling.
    But the "Scheduling comparision" button in the PPB does'nt seem to work.
    ( I am selecting the activity and then pressing the button for"display original status" )
    How do I use this functionality?
    Thanks in advance.

    Hi Potluri Srinivas ,
    After some tests, I still donot get, how does this functionalties work either.
    I assume, it is linked with the setting in 'option' -> 'planning board' -> 'diagramm area' -> 'orginal schedule'.  But I donot know, how the two things linked directly.
    If you find it out, please post it.
    Thanks and  regards,
    Zhenbo

  • Activity bar not displaying on Project planning board

    Dear All,
    I am getting one problem related to project planning board. I am working on a system in which when i am trying to run  project planning board, its coming but in that gant chart i am not able to see bar for activity. Bar for project definition and wbs coming properly. In tabular form also i can see the activities. But the only problem i am not able to see bar for activity with relationships. I have check almost all configuration related to project planning board profile and also scheduling proflies.
    Kindly suggest what can be the reason for the same.
    Regards
    Abhishek Sinha

    Hi Abdul,
    Thanks for reply. I have check all these options but all things are in place. OPT7 setting also right there. Kindly suggest what other setting can affect. In the planning board i can see the activity at left hand side corner with details but in gantt chart where we see bar chart for schdulines there activties are not coming.
    Kindly suggest.
    Regards
    Abhishek Sinha

Maybe you are looking for