Combined order based and delivery based billing

Hey Gurus,
We are using ZTAN items and ZTAD items on the sales orders.  We are trying to figure out how to combine these two together to create one invoice.  Can you guys help us with what the configuration should be in order do this?  I woudl like to knwo what settings I need to make in item category and also what settings need to be changed in the copy controls?  Do I need to change them for F2 and other settings in VTFA?
Please let us know.
Sincerely,
Nina

Hi,
Delete the Assignment number and Reference number in the copy control at the header level details in VTFA.
For this message and try it .
We are using order based billing for the ZTAD items right now and using delivery based billing for the ZTAN items. So, to answer your question, we do want to combine these two together.
I have tried setting the VTFA copy control settings to 001, and I still can't seem to get the two line items to combine.
Note, I only created a new copy control for the ZTAD items.
I looked to see if the header data was different and this was the log that was outputted but I can't seem to figure out what this means:
Fld Name $000000001 $000000002
Combination criteria in the bi 0013030 00330308000000064
Assignment number $
I am not sure how to analyze this. If you have any suggestions, I would be really appreciative. Thanks for all of your help Shivaji.
Sincerely,
Nina

Similar Messages

  • Billing experts: Combining order related and deliv. related

    Hello Billing experts,
    I am just wondering if it is possible at all to combine order related and delivery related to ONE billing document (one DMR and one delivery note with the same payer).
    Or do we have to use Invoice List? I can't make it work.
    Same payer, same Payment Terms and different pricing procedures(with RL00). What other fields that must have identical values, so the billing documents will be grouped in the invoice list?
    Thanks alot in advance!
    Best Regards,
    Tuan Vo

    Hi Tuan Vo
    Since there are many other criteria, its not a viable Solution to combine, order related and delivery related to one billing document even though its possible in SAP.
    The following prerequisites must be met for a Single Invoice from Delivers and/or orders:
    1) the header data appearing in the billing document must agree
    2) the split conditions specified do not apply
    As you see, the Delivery related Invoice has always a pre-checking with the Goods Issue status where as Order related doesn't have to.
    Hence Invoice lists is the option given by SAP.
    However, with an intelligent Copy Control routines between the documents should do the trick.
    The system combines documents with the same customer number, proposal billing type and sales organization, and attempts to include them all in the same billing document. If the preconditions are met, then a single invoice is created for the deliveries and/or orders.
    Note that When creating several billing documents, user exits can be used to reset the header data, so that more can be combined than in the billing due list and later combine to single document.
    There are other fields like Material Group, Billing Dates, Billing Document Type, Item categories which can force for an Invoice split.
    Please let me know if it helps.
    Best Regards
    Ajay Kumar Veeranki

  • Whast is order related billing and delivery related billing?

    Explain about order related billing and delivery related billing
    thanks

    hi,
    just to add,
    In Customizing for the item category at VOV7, you can determine the basis for billing using the indicator <b>Billing relevance</b>.
    This allows you to carry out the following controls:
    A: Relevant for delivery-related billing documents
    Outbound delivery is the basis for billing. The billing document status is only updated in the outbound delivery.
    B: Relevant for order-related billing documents
    The sales document is the basis for billing. The billing status is defined by the required quantity.
    In the standard system the item categories REN (returns) and BVN (cash sales) are set up in this way.
    So depending upon the billing documents configured to the sales document for order and delivery related billing, would be triggered based on the item category setting for billing relevance.
    Pl reward if it helps.
    Thanks
    Sadhu Kishore

  • PGI and Delivery based on FIFO

    Dear All,
    I have a requirement that while GR we enter the batch based on the manufacturing date. I want PGI and delivery on FIFO based on the GR date of the material. Moreover, we have two company codes using the same material codes. I want to have FIFO based delivery applied in only one company code.It should not affect the other company.Is it possible at plant level. I also dont want automatic batch creation at GR time. I want PGI and Delivery based on the GR date. Please suggest

    create a batch search strategy in VCH1 with strategy  type as SD02- and select the key combination as customer, plant & material so that you can restrict the batch search strategy in plant level.
    or
    use MBC1 - select the strategy ME01, select the key combination as Movement type, plant & material

  • Move Order lines and Delivery Detail lines - Relationship

    Hi All,
    Is there a one - to - one realtionship between Move Order Line and Delivery Detail Line?
    i.e., Each Move Order line will correspond to only one Delivery Details line Record?
    Thanks in advance.
    Regards,
    Gowri

    Hello,
    There is a one - to - many relationship between Move Order Line and Delivery Detail Line when you split lines in delivery.
    select * from mtl_material_transactions t you have source_id.
    select * from WSH_DELIVERABLES_v t you have move_order_id.
    Regards,
    Luko

  • BW - COPA extraction requirements for account based and costing based

    Our client has a requirements of having both account based and costing based BW extraction from ECC.
    Is it recommended? if yes, how does it effect BW data model?

    Hi Ali Khan,
    Kindly have a look at below link,
    http://sap.seo-gym.com/copa.pdf
    yes it's possible and it will not affect BW.
    Hope this helps.
    Regards,
    Mani

  • Costing based and account based

    HI All
    Kindly let me know difference between costing based copa and accounting based copa with examples
    Thanks & Regards
    Phaneendra

    Two forms of Profitability Analysis are supported: costing-based and account-based.  
    Costing-based Profitability Analysis is the form of profitability analysis that groups
        costs and revenues according to value fields and costing-based valuation approaches,
        both of which you can define yourself. It guarantees you access at all times to
        a complete, short-term profitability report.
    Account-based Profitability Analysis is a form of profitability analysis organized in
        accounts and using an account-based valuation approach. The distinguishing
        characteristic of this form is its use of cost and revenue elements. It provides you with
        a profitability report that is permanently reconciled with financial accounting.
    You can also use both of these types of CO-PA simultaneously.
    (courtesy: help.sap.com)
    It is strongly recommended, however, that you do not activate both types of CO-PA. The
    major reason being is that you will have significant table size impacts. You must be careful
    with account based CO-PA as this creates additional line items in the existing CO tables of
    COEP (actual), COEJ (plan), COSP & COSS (summary records). Hence if you want to do any
    cost center reporting, say, from any of these existing tables you will run the risk that
    performance will be degraded by these additional and unnecessary records. 
    The only advantage of account based over costing based CO-PA is it's ability to
    automatically reconcile back to FI, in much the same manner as you would reconcile
    cost center accounting back to FI. However you don't have the flexibility in account
    based CO-PA to perform valuations using product cost estimates etc. as you do in
    costing based CO-PA. If the reason you were advised to turn on account based CO-PA
    as well as costing based was to facilitate reconciliation, it is suggested that you look
    at alternatives that won't have the same negative impacts that turning on account
    based would have. In addition to the serious table space issues, it is not that easy to
    turn on and off account based at will (especially in production).
    Instead what you should look at doing is creating a series of reports that enable you to
    reconcile costing based CO-PA back to CCA/PCA and FI, if this is required. The complexity
    of the costing based functionality you have used will determine the complexity of the
    reports that will be needed to reconcile back, but it can be done without turning on
    account based CO-PA.

  • Difference between account based and cost based in co-pa

    hi friends,
    what is main deffirencebetween account based and cost based in co-pa. what scenerio we use account based and what scenerio we use cost based.
    Thanking u
    suneel.

    Hi,
    It all depends on the OPerating oncern which you are going to use for the CO-PA implementaion.
    For a account based Operating concern you can define accopund based copa.
    For a Cost Based Operating concdern you will have tp define account based Copa.
    You can create account based Copa on cost based operating concern and vice versa.
    In most of the FI implemntaion is done before BW inplemetation and therefore Operating concerns are already defined by the FI people.
    Thanks
    Message was edited by:
            Ajeet Singh

  • 1 Operating Concern for Account Based and Cost Based COPA

    Hi,
    We are using Operating Concern 3000 for Account Based and Cost based Profitability Analysis. However when i try to extract data from the account based Operating concern it gives me an error in extraction : error 09.
    Could it be that we cannot use one operating concern for both types or COPA?
    Thanks

    Hi
    Have you deactivated any of the characteristics used in Account based COPA
    Check KEQ3 and you may have activated only for Costing based COPA
    S Jayaram
    Edited by: S Jayram on Dec 18, 2007 3:24 PM

  • COPA : Accounting Based and Costing Based

    Hello Guru's,
    We are on ECC 6.0 and BI 7.3. Our customer is going to implement Accounting based COPA and Costing based COPA in ECC. We have a requirement to have both the Accounting based and Costing based COPA analysis  available in BI. 
    My questions and concerns:
    If we configure both type of COPA in ECC then Can we create both type of data sources also in ECC  ? one for Accounting based COPA and one for Costing based copa ?  If yes then do we need to have 2 infocubes in BI  or one infocube with mapping of both the data source will work ? ... do please correct me or suggest me.
    Regards,
    Komik Shah

    Hi Sridhar,
    Thanks for your reply, can you explain if we want to stop one of the method, what is the steps that need to be done?
    thanks again!

  • Costing Based And Account based COPA - Need Assistance

    Hello All,
    In our project, with no other option we are planning to implement both costing based and account based COPA. I have been told that it is not recommended by SAP because for every entry there will two line items, one in cost based and another in account based (Correct me if I am wrong). But I could not understand why it is creating 2 line items in COPA. - Please help to understand this concept with an Example.
    Thanks
    PM

    Hi
    Costing based and account based COPA serve the same purpose...   analyze profitability of the product ....
    Costing based COPA should always be preferred over account based COPA, as it provides greater flexibility, some extra features, some extra planning mechanism and faster reports
    Following  are the point of differences between Costing based vs. Account based copa (ABC)
    1. Account based copa uses transaction tables (COEP, BSEG) and hence affects performance of CO transactions.CBC takes values from CE1XXXX to CE4XXXX tables. XXXX means Operating Concern name.
    2. Estimated / Statistical values not possible in ABC, say, calculating frieght upon invoice on a thumb rule basis to have better view of profitability per customer.. no valuation strategy in Accounts based COPA..
    3. Reports based on line items not possible in ABC.. possible in CBC.
    4 Actual Top Down distribution only available in CBC not in ABC .
    5. Revaluation of actual data to plan data is not available in ABC
    6. No key figure schemes are available in ABC
    7. In ABC, settlement cost elements are used to settle values to prof segments unlike value fields in CBC
    8. Production variance / COGS accounts shud be defined as cost element in ABC.
    System creates a document for each type of COPA as it stores values in different tables and what you can do with this data also differs like you can do TOP down in Costing Based Copa..
    Hence, you will have two COPA documents always......................
    Fot further clarifications .. please revert back..
    Regards
    Sarada

  • Order and delivery related billing from same Sales Order

    Hi
    I have a scenario where in the same sales order customer has put two line items.One with item category TAN i.e. Delivery related billing and other TAD i.e. Order related billing. Line item with TAN item category is invoiced. When trying to create invoice for second line item(TAD) system gives error like" Item Category OR TAN can not be invoiced with billing type F2".that means when I create billing for second line item ,it also drags first line item which is already billed.
    Please suggest.
    Thanks

    Hello,
    the system works in this way:
    - for every item present in the sales document to be billed, it searches an entry customizing copy control table TVCPF.
    - if TVCPF entry does not exist (because TAN is not maintained in transaction VTFA OR -> F2) then system issues message VF003
    - If TVCPF entry exists, then system performs the copy-requirement routine to check if the item is billeable.
    SOLUTION:
    You could maintain an entry in VTFA for combination OR -> F2 item TAN, and put a copy-requirement routine setting SY-SUBRC = 4, so that the billing is item is not created for the sales order TAN item.
    Best regards,
    Ivano.

  • The difference between 'Pigment Based' and 'Dye Based' color inks?

    What is the difference between 'Pigment Based' color inks (as used in the HP OfficeJet 8500 series) and 'Dye Based' color inks (as used in the HP OfficeJet 7500 printer)?
    Thanks;
    Mark S

    Pigment based inks have small color particles suspended in a carrier (like paint).  Dye based inks have colorant disolved in the carrier (like water colors).  Pigment based inks generally have better lightfastness, dye based inks are generally better for photo quality on glossy media.  The following Google search has many pages with useful information.
    Bob Headrick,  HP Expert
    I am not an employee of HP, I am a volunteer posting here on my own time.
    If your problem is solved please click the "Accept as Solution" button ------------V
    If my answer was helpful please click the "Thumbs Up" to say "Thank You"--V

  • Relationship table of Sales Order (VA03) and Delivery Order (VL03N)

    Hi everyone!
    What table can I see the relationship of Sales Order document (VA03) and Delivery Order document (VL03N) as shown in VA03 > Environment > Document Flow?
    I mean, what tables saves the partnerships of each document (query sales order no. and get equivalent delivery order no. or nos.)
    Thank you very much!

    Hi
    U can use the fm RV_ORDER_FLOW_INFORMATION in order to get out those links or you can read the item table LIPS:
    LIPS-VGBEL  = sales order number
    LIPS-VGPOS  = salese order item
    Max

  • PA - Costing-Based and Account-Based

    Hi All,
    Please tell me what is Costing based PA and Account-based PA.
    Thanks
    Vinu

    Hi,
    Costing-Based Profitability Analysis
    This type of Profitability Analysis is primarily designed to let you analyze profit quickly for the purpose of sales management. Its main features are, firstly, the use of value fields to group cost and revenue elements, and, secondly, automatic calculation of anticipated or accrual data (valuation). The advantage of this method is that data is always up‑to‑date and therefore provides an effective instrument for controlling sales.
    Account-Based Profitability Analysis
    This type of Profitability Analysis enables you to reconcile cost and financial accounting at any time using accounts. In contrast to costing‑based Profitability Analysis, this type uses cost and revenue elements, which gives you a unified structure for all of accounting.
    The system posts all revenues and costs to both Financial Accounting and Profitability Analysis at the same time and using the same valuation method. This means that the cost of sales is posted to Profitability Analysis at the point of goods issue.
    Regards,
    Eli

Maybe you are looking for