Commitment item updated wrongly

Hi friends
I have a doubt in funds management budget control suystem
at the time of creating PO - No problem (FM account assignment is providing me correct commitment item and Fundscenter)
Below is the scenario
I have assigned commitment item - "INV" for the inventory FI-GL account and it is populated in PO - correctly
when i do the GRN i get
Inventory account Debited with commitement item "INV" (correctly)
GR/IR account credited with commitemnt item "INV" (wrongly)
for the GR/IR line item I want commitment "GR/IR" to get populated instead of commitment tem "INV"
In the GR/IR GL account I have assigned commitment item "GR/IR"
if so why am I getting commitment item "INV" instead of commitment item "GR/IR"
where is the problem please please can you help me by answering this
P.S
the commitment item "INV" is with 30/3 Combination
the commitment item "GR/IR" is with 40/3 combination
Thank you & Kindest Regards
Srikaanth

Hi, before posting use search, this question discussed.
\You can't substitute CI for GR/IR account during GR, it populate from Dr account(from PO)

Similar Messages

  • No commitment Item Update while creation of Sales order

    hi,
    I have  maintained Derivation Rule
    Co Code / GL/ BA/ Plant / S Loc/ = Fund / Comitement / Fund Center.
    Stil in that case at the time of creation of Sales order, systeme is giving error (++No commitment Item Update M V2225++)
    And also i have maintained the Comitement Item in GL master.
    Could you give me some solution.
    Thanks
    Nilesh R

    Hi Nilesh R,
    Please check the following information of Consulting Note 1268001 (the same for funds center is valid to commitment item):
    1.  You receive the error message in a Sales Order (SD) process.
       a) SD customizing settings for FM objects.
       You can set "commitment item" as an optional entry in SD customizing settings for field status. This can be checked in the IMG path: SPRO -> Public Sector Management -> Funds Management Government-> Actual and Commitment Update/Integration -> Integration ->
       Maintain Field Status for Assigning FM Account Assignments
       You should have a record with Object type = '04' (sales order).
       It is not necessary to have the field as required (unless you want to insert it in the origin process) due to the fact that
       this can avoid the account assignment derivation between CO objects and FM objects. The field can not be hidden otherwise it will be not derived.
       For more information, check note 572729.
    The system response depends on how you defined the fields of the FM dialog box using Customizing activity 'Maintain Field Status for Assigning FM Account Assignments':
         -  The fields of the FM dialog box are defined as ready for input ('Opt. entry' or 'Req. entry') in Customizing:
            If you change the reference object in the sales order, the system does not re-derive FM data automatically. For that, you
            must navigate to the FM dialog box and, by choosing icon 'Redetermine account (F5)', trigger the derivation manually.
         -   The fields of the FM dialog box are defined as not changeable ('Display') in Customizing:
             If the reference object is changed in the order, FM data is redetermined automatically.
         -  The fields of the FM dialog box are defined as not displayable ('Hide') in Customizing:
             FM data is not determined.
    Therefore, set the field status to optional permit the user to enter the FM objects manually and still benefit from the possibility to
    automatically derive the FM objects from a CO object.
    For more information on integrating Plant Maintenance, Sales and Distribution and Project System, see the SAP Library Accounting -> Public Sector Management -> Funds Management -> Actual and Commitment Update -> Integration with Plant Maintenance, Integration with Sales and Distribution and Integration with Project System (Network).
    You can also check the documentation available in the IMG menu of the status (written above).
       b) If you do not want to integrate sales order process within PSM-FM, you should consider to deactivate this integration in
          customizing transaction OFUP. In release EA-PS 1.10 and 2.00 modification note 591573 is available.
    Please also check consulting note 1267998 and let me know if you have used FMDERIVE trace tool.
    If you want to have SD integrated to FM, please check if in OFUP the flag of this integration is accordingly set.
    If you work with free-of-charge sales order line items mixed with line items having value, please consider to apply note 1441847 (if it is valid to your current release/package).
    I hope this answer your inquiry.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa Barth.

  • How to Change financial trasnactin for commitment item for which no trasnaction has been posted

    Hi ,
    1.
    \We re in process to Go live for he FUND Management module for Power generation business, while we create all  FM master data and budget structure we found a mistake in NONBUDGET commitment items. we wrongly mapped financial transaction 30, while changing it to 40 system showing following massage,
    Field "Fin.transaction" cannot be changed
        Message no. F6288
    Diagnosis
        You can no longer change the entry in field Fin.transaction as commitment
        item NONBUDGET in FM area SAPL and fiscal year  has already been defined
        as a budget object.
    System Response
        Field Fin.transaction is not changed.
    2. when we try to delete the commitment item system showing following error
    Commitment item NONBUDGET in FM area  and Fyear SAPL defined as a budget
    object
        Message no. F6206
    Diagnosis
        The commitment item NONBUDGET in the FM area SAPL and fiscal year  was
        defined as a budget object.
    System Response
        The chosen action was not executed.
    Procedure
        Remove the indentification Budget object in the budget structure.
    As per above error we check the following details
    1. FM deriver - Removed NONBUDGET from all the rule
    2. There is no Budget/ Posting in FM9k
    3. There is no activation of budget ( no golive)
    4 There is no data posted with the commitment Items

    Hi Jeetendra
    Try deleting the budget structure using FMBSBO_DEL.
    Thanks
    Shyam

  • Derivation of wrong commitment item in ML81N

    Dear all,
    A material document is created in ML81N with expenses a/c Dr. & provision for expenses a/c Cr & the budget is cosumed with debit of the expenses.& also Cr of this provision for expenses.Because the system defaulting the committment item of the expenses which is different from the commitment item attached to the provision for expenses G/L.
    I have enhanced  the  derivation rule in FMDERIVE with checking the business transaction,G/L & commitment item.Then switch on Trace. Then while saving/posting/checking transaction i can see business transaction and other details also.
    Even then the same problem is exist.
    Now can any one advice me how to proceed further.
    Thanks
    Shivaji

    Hi Shivaji,
    Please check the following hints:
    1) First of all, we need to be sure that all existent correction notes are implemented in your system. Please check if the following notes are applied in your system (including manual steps):
    1289547 FM account assignment incorrect in GR/IR clearing in service
    1450965 FM account assignment incorrectly inherited from PO
    1480503 FM account assignment for GL line overwritten in MIRO
    1502874 Planned Delivery Costs are not updated during GR/IR postings
    These notes correct wrong behaviours in include LFMCOBLF06 related to account assignment.
    If the notes are not there (and valid to your release/package), please apply all in one test system and retest your issue.
    2) Regarding inheriting the FM assignments, material po's can retrieve the FM account assignments from the FM tables.  This insures that the current FM account assigments are always used.
    However, in the case of Services, it is not possible to use the FM tables as it is not guaranteed that the correct Account assigment will be retrieved.  So, the SES table ESKN is used instead. The ESKN record is created at the time the SES is created.
    So, the Invoice should inherit from the GR.  But, it is not possible to read the FM tables to get the account assignment.
    3) Talking about your derivation rules (i believe you checked this already), please enter in the derivation rule -> Definition Tab, double click in the name of your Target Field (bottom part of the screen).
    There you will find the fields:
    ( ) Do not overwrite if Fld Already Filled
    ( ) Overwrite with new value
    ( ) Overwrite with new value if new value is not empty.
    I believe you should have marked the first option due to your business requirements described in this thread.
    4) I believe you have set your derivation rule to derive commitment item with the function module  FMDT_READ_MD_ACCOUNT_COMPANY  "Read Account Master Data". For additional information, check note
    839488.
    5) You can also add Conditions to your Derivation step regarding commitment item to not perform the step when (VORGN = 'RMWE' AND KTOSL = 'WRX') OR (VORGN = 'RMRP' AND KTOSL = 'WRX').  To simplify the maintenance of this condition, the Temporary flag could be used instead.  You can set this flag in a previous step using the attributes above and then use that in the Condition list.
    I hope this helps. If nothing helped, let me know the content of table FM01X in your system and your current release/package.
    Best Regards,
    Vanessa.

  • GR/IR Account with Wrong Commitment Item

    Dear Experts,
    When we doing GR(MIGO), system is not deriving the commitment item from FMDerive, istead taking the commitment item from offsetting GL entry. Is it common behavior? If not, how to force GR act derived into right commitment item which its category (40/3). Please kindly advise. Thank you.

    Hi kkbdsp,
    My issue is this GR account is never derived from FMDerive. And i searched in forum, this is common behavior in SAP like Ming Hong post below :
    " What you described is a SAP standard behavior. For GR/IR account, system ignores whatever settings you made in FMDERIVE.  FM account assignment is inherited from the PO. For example your consumption PO has expense account 456 with CI 456, Fund and FC; your GR/IR account is 123 with CI 123.
    GR posting:
    DR 456 with CI 456/Fund/FC
    CR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
    IR posting:
    DR 123 with CI 456/Fund/FC
    CR Vendor
    Regards,
    Ming
    And my concern are :
    - I am just wondering why do we need to make CI setting for GR/IR with category 40/30?
    - if GR act is always derived from its offseting acct (expense acct 30/3), why then SAP give error message "GR reduction impossible. Wrong CI with FT 30 instead of 40 in GR/IR acct"?
    Please kindly advise. Thanks.

  • MM-FM integration. How to stop update of Fund Center and Commitment Item

    Hello!
    Anyone please help. MM-FM integration.
    Our problem is after automatic creation of PR and PO from work orders, and the fund center and commitment item in the PR and PO has been changed/updated by the user, and then we change something in the work order and save it, the fund center and commitment item of the PR and PO goes back to default value (based on FMderive). Is there a way to stop this?
    Thanks in advance for your help.
    Regards,
    Rona

    It seems like you have selected "Do not overwrite target values" option in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in the derivation rule defined.
    Go through SAP Note 666322, make sure the Trace feature in On and then choose the option "Overwrite Target Values" in both Funds Enter and Commitment Item in your derivation rule. After that, see the Difference before and after values in the trace log created after performing the derivation rule.
    I am sure this will help.
    Regards,
    Amar Lal

  • Fund center and commitment item not updated

    Hi!
    We are using Funds Management together with SRM. When we change the value of e.g. cost center and not the account assignment itself we do not get an update on fund center. When changing account we do not get an update on commitment item either. This is standard SAP and we have been asked to use BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI. Have anyone else had this problem?
    I would really appreciate if anyone have some code for this BADI or any other badi e.g. BBP_ECS_PO_OUT_BADI. It is only important that changes in PO when replicated to back end results in the correct update of commitment item and fund center.
    Sincerely
    Andres

    Solved through BBP_DOC_CHANGE_BADI

  • FMCN - Open Item upload Commitment not updated in case of Service Entry

    Hi All,
    I am trying to use FMCN to update commitment and fund centers in open PO's and GR's, however where there is material PO's it updating perfectly but if there is Service PO then it is not updating in GR/IR account with non budgeted commitment Item.
    Here in this client what they have done whenever they create the service entry sheet same time GR (MIGO) entry will get generated and then user can do the MIRO for the same.
    Please help me to update the same with Non Budgeted commitment.
    Regards,
    Alok

    Hi
    check this table also
    ESLB Service Type Header of Standard Service Catalog
    ESLH Service Package Header Data
    ESLP Service Item
    ESLL Lines of Service Package
    i thing this only link between  purchase table like Po table  and service PO table
    so we can link service po logic for service Po
    Regards
    kailas ugale

  • How update Fund Center and Commitment Item after posting

    hi Experts,
    Funds management was activated during the year and hence there are few open items saved without capturing Fund Center and Commitment Item. When i tried to clear these open item i get the following error
    Line  in document xxx xxxxxxxxxxxx   does not contain any commitment items
    Is there any program which i can use to update derivation to the already posted line item
    Thanks in Advance

    Hi,
    Solutions proposed by Alexey are good if FM document was created for the FI documents in question. If, however, no FM document was created, reassignment process won't help. You can try FMN0 transaction after creating a derivation rule in FMDERIVE for these documents, but I cannot confirm that it would be sucessful as FMN0 transaction is not perfect.
    The solution could be updating FI tables (BSEG/BSIS/BSAS) with FM assignment (fund centre/commitment item) and only then running FMN0 transaction. In this case, FM document will be created and you'll be able to process the items.
    Regards,
    Eli

  • FMMPRELE - have error - FMKU135: The commitment item category is wrong

    Hello,
    In current project we use BCS and SAP ECC 6.0.
    We also use auto-release function in FMBB when entering budget documents (plan).
    I want to reduce the plan value and use FMMPRELE transaction for it. In message log i have the following error:
    The commitment item category is wrong
    Message no. FMKU135
    Diagnosis
    The commitment item category entered is not correct.
    Procedure
    Check how the commitment item category is filled by your application. Notify your system administrator in case of problems.
    The commitment item category (FMCIA) is 3 - Expenditures. I don't know why SAP doesn't like this commitment item category because this category is selected in "selection of FM Account Assignments". Have any the same problems with FMMPRELE?

    Thank's a lot
    solved!

  • Commitment item does not update during PO change

    hello All,
    when we change PO " GL account " the old commitment item remains without changes.
    your help is appreciated,
    I.Gad

    Hi,
    Please, consult note 658163 - Acct assignmnt change: Determinatn of new FM acct assignmnt
    Regards,
    Eli

  • Reverse incorrectly posted entries to commitment item - FM Module

    Hello,
    We had defined an incorrect commitment item in the G/L master and posted some documents for that G/L code which affected the FM module.
    After realizing the mistake, we changed the G/L master for that G/L code to update the correct commitment item but by that time quite a few entries had been posted to the wrong commitment item in the FM module.
    So we have a discrepancy in the FM module currently.
    Is there any way to reverse the wrong entries within the FM module and re-post to the correct commitment item - without reversing the G/L entries?
    Greatly appreciate your assistance.
    Best Regards,
    Vijay M.
    Edited by: Vijay M on May 12, 2009 10:58 AM

    Hi Naveen,
    check the following tables
    1. FMIFIHD - FM Header table in Fund management
    2. FMIFIIT - FM Line item Table in Fund management
    3. FMIT - Totals table for fund management
    4. FMIA- Actual Line item table for Fund management
    For the second point, i think you need to reverse the origin document and repost it with correct amount. There is no other option.
    BR
    Amitash

  • Message no. FMKU135, The commitment item category is not correct

    Dear experts,
    I'm trying to chek how budget release works in BCS. When I run transaction FMMPRELE, the message in the title appears.
    The commitment items in the message log are with category "3" - expenditure. What can be wrong with that?
    If you have any idea, please share.
    Thanks in advance,
    Toni

    Hi
    any update on this? I also got the same error. What should I do?
    Thanks

  • Conflict between Client object model and Item Updated Event Receiver in sharepoint 2010

    Hello All,
    As per my requirement I have a two custom list.
    Agent Details
    Port Name
    Agent Details contains Agent code, Port Name,  email, address and phone of Agent. Its possible that one Agent Code is connected with multiple Port Name.
    Basically what I am doing is I am getting port name connected with Agent code, using jquery and bind those values with check box(using javascript created dynamically) and bind all with Div tag.
    Now when my custom edit form of Agent list open up it shows me different port name binding with checkbox group.
    when user select the check box and click confirm button my clicent object model script will run and add this selected value into Port Name list. 
    After confirm one more button named Save will enable asking user to edit the email, phone or address value and when I click on save my Item updated event fires which update the values of the selected port name(These port name I am getting from port
    name list) to Agent Details custom list.
    Now when I am trying to update the values my event receiver fires or some times it got stuck(not firing). So could you please help me the possible alternative for this requirements.
    Can we user the Ecma Script(Client object model to preserve the value of selectec port) and Item updated event receiver on the same time?
    Is anything am doing wrong then please guide me.

    Hi,
    As I understand, when you updated values in the agent details list the Item updated event receiver got stuck sometimes.
    The item update event receiver will fire after the item has been saved, and the client object model script or the Ecma Script runs before the item is saved, so there is no conflict between the client object model script and item update event receiver.
    You could find out the reason about the item update event receiver gets stuck by debugging the event receiver.
    When you want to debug your event receivers, you have to attach to OWSTIMER.EXE and wait till they are executed. You can control this behavior using the Synchronization attribute. Also, if you’re looking for an easy way to debug an event receiver without
    having to manually attach a debugger to your code, you can use the System.Diagnostics.Debugger.Launch() method.
    The articles below are about how to debug in the event receiver in SharePoint 2010.
    http://sharepoint-kings.blogspot.jp/2013/02/debugging-event-receivers-in-sharepoint.html
    http://chakkaradeep.com/index.php/event-receivers-in-sharepoint-2010/
    http://sharesaint.com/?p=77
    Best regards,
    Sara Fan
    TechNet Community Support
    Please remember to mark the replies as answers if they help, and unmark the answers if they provide no help. If you have feedback for TechNet Support, contact
    [email protected]

  • Reassignment of commitment items & fund centers in open PR, PO & MIGO docs

    Hi
    We  are using Fund Management (BCS) in our system since last one year. Now starting from next fiscal year ( 01.04.2009) we want to replace some of the existing fund centers and commitment items with either newly created fund centers & commitment items or existing ones. We will be changing FM derivation strategy too.
    How should one go about it? Whats should be the strategy and procedure for replacing the commitment items & fund centers in open PR, POs & other open document. I know there is option of  reassignment of fund centers and commitment items using reassignment derivation strategy. But I am not clear about the steps involved and strategy one should use while doing so.
    Pawan

    Hello Pawan,
    You can also combine reassignment with closing operations (Carryforward with reassignment)
    Pls check the link, under 'Closing Operations -> Derivation Strategy for Reassignments with Closing Operations'
    By doing so, you can carry forward for example open PO's assigned to given account assingment in 2008 to a new account assignment in 2009
    Reassignment programs RFFMCHAN and RFFMCHAT are normally used when Wrongly assigned documents or changes in the responsibility areas of the functional assignment necessitate account assignment changes within the year, or when PSM-FM is implemented later than other components.
    I hope this will help
    Kind regards
    Mar

Maybe you are looking for