Condition Determination in CN33

Hi Experts,
I am attempting to build a report that would mimic PO creation process for my client. My issue is that I am unable to find where the conditions are determined for each component being added into the project when CN33 is being run.
After each component is added through CN33, the component has the same price as the PO will eventually have, where do PS determine this price?
Thanks!

In the Purchasing Data tab of the component on the project (in cj20n) it shows the Price/Currency field. This field is populated with the price of the component (taking into account the PB00 and the VA00).
At this point there is no purchasing documents created, yet it is showing the proper price. This has lead me to believe that during the material transfer in CN33 that the conditions are read to determine this price.
When I look at the CN10_PROCEED_ASSIGNMENT function module that runs during CN33, I can't see where it would determine this, maybe I am looking in the wrong area.
I would like to be able to determine the conditions per component and have a custom report created so that the Project Managers can validate them before a PR is created and sent to Purchasing for a PO.
I hope that this clears up what I am lookg for, and to do.
Thanks!

Similar Messages

Shipping condition determination (OVL2) not open and system close

Dear Guys,
as per attached, i used ECC 6 VM and when use t.code OVL2 to open Shipping condition determination system appear this error and terminated.
IS there another choice to link Ship condition+Plan+LoadingGroup.

Hi Nagi,
Is a plant determined in the document in ERP after downloading from CRM? If not then this is probably the reason so you will need to map a vendor partner in CRM to a plant in ERP at item level so that the determination of the shipping point takes place.
Kind regards,
Vanessa

No Conditions Determined (NoAuthorization for Input)

Hi, I'm new in SAP, can anybody please help me with this error messages happened in MIGO transaction?
"No Conditions Determined (No Authorization for Input) - Message No.: 06235
Diagnosis:
Your user master record does not include authorization to perform this function or display certain data.
Procedure:
Contact your system administrator.
Your function authorization does not cover the entry of conditions.
Function authorizations may be maintained or displayed by authorized persons in Customizing."
The user is doing MIGO with Article that has a Material Type: Packaging. The document won't post due to said error messages.
I've already checked the user authorization, everything is ok.
Please advise.
Thanks.

Hi,
You can check with your system administrator (basis admin) to check whether correct profile has been authorized for your user name.
Regards

Price condition determination for purchasing contract(ME31K)

Hi Experts,
     It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
Thank you very much in advance.

>
Gangrong Chen wrote:
> Hi Experts,
>
>      It is possible to apply price condition determination in purchasng contract(ME31K)? We had maintain the price condition for below keys: WBS/Material number and this condition record work well in purchase order. But I hope that this condition record is applied in pruchasing contract when we create contract by ME31K. Plz kindly give me a suggestion.
>
> So I want to check the condition dtermination is whether fullfil my requirement. If we can not use the price condition determination to get the net price, then we only go for user-exit to get it.
>
> Thank you very much in advance.
Why not, in me31k, click on condition button on toolbar for item conditions and for header conditions, click on menu bar path HEADER>CONDITIONS and maintain your conditions accordingly.

No conditions determined (no authorization for input)

Hi Friends,
I am trying to create a PO but i am getting a error message that "No conditions determined (no authorization for input)" and I am unable to view the conditions tab.
Can anyone please guide how do I rectify the error.
Regards,
Wasim.

Hi,
When I run the t-code SU53 it says "The last authorization check was successful" But the problem still exists.
Regards,
Wasim,

Freight conditions determination

Hi Experts,
How are freight conditions determined? and they are determined at shipment level or shipment cost document level?in which document these conditions are captured at shipment out put or shipment cost document output? Throw some light on this issue.
Thanks,
KP.

HI
Fright cost are determined in shipments cost document when you create the same in VI01
regards
Prashanth

Condition Determination in Quotation

Dear all,
In quotation transaction pricing condition types is not determining automatically.
Downloaded condition objects from ECC - 'DNL_CUST_CNDALL, DNL_CUST_CND, DNL_CUST_PRC'.
I have add user parameter PRC_TRAC and check SLG1 downloaded conditions.
Ensured all Condtion Tables, Condition Types and Pricing Procedures downloaded in to CRM system (BP C03.3.1.5.3.3)
I have re-downloaded objects DNL_CUST_CNDALL, DNL_CUST_PRC and DNL_CUST_CND, but there is no improvement.
I could not trace the problem from where it is coming, Kindly help me in resolving the issue.
Best regards,
Amulet

Hi,
Step 1
Is it that the system is not determining a specific condition type or all the condition types? If the system is not determining a specific condition type, jump to step 2. If none of the condition types are determined, go to header --> Prices tab page and check if the pricing procedure is determined or not.
If pricing Procedure is determined, Go to customizing and check if the pricing proc, condition types, acess seq, and accesses are there properly.
If pricing procedure field is blank, check the customizing for the determination of the same
Step 2
What does the Pricing Analysis say? I hope you have already activated PRC_TRACE wth value "X" (upper case) in SU3. Now go to the item level conditions tab page and click on ACESSES button. It gets the pricing analysis from IPC and displays you the exact reason why a condition type is not determined automaticaly as required.
Step 3
Additionally, go to ECC and check in a quotation if it determining properly there in ECC or not.
Regds,
Raghu

Pricing condition determination in billing

I created a pricing condition record which will be determined just in billing document.It is tariff price. Just to determine this pricing condition in the billing document how should I configure the system?
Now for Standard sales order and for billing document types same document pricing procedure is assigned as "A-standard"
Should I?
1) Create a new pricing procedure and add the new pricing condition type in it.
2) Assign a new document pricing procedure to billing document type
3) Assign new pricing procedure to the new document pricing procedure in pricing procedure determination?
I don't want this pricing condition to be determined in sales order. Is there any other way instead of creating a new pricing procedure?
Thanks
Edited by: sevdada on Apr 24, 2009 3:50 PM

Is the pricng condition in the sales order as well as billing pricing procedure currently. If this is a new condition type for which you are maintinaing a condition record then with a comibination of a new billing type and new pricing procedure and condition type you can trigger this.
But if the condition type exists in both the sales order and the billing and only condition record is different then you could use perhaps a differentiating feature of this condition.
Is the tariff price different at the time of sales order and billing. IN what way. use this using standard billing copy controls or write a user exit to use this.
For instance if you wnat the system to take the exchange rate on the day of billing and not the sales order you can use the control in the item copy controls from delivery to billing doc as exchange rate on the billing date as the control.
Unless you can elaborate the condition record and your exact problem its difficult to give an exact solution.
regards
Jude

Condition Determination in Return PO

Hi,
I have some delivery conditions like OCTROI for a PO. However, i do not want these conditions to be detemined during a Return PO for the same article vendor combination. I mean when i put a return indicator in PO , i do not want these conditions to be determinned automatically.
How can i achieve this?
Thanks & Regards
Jajati

Hi,
Check the last purchase order created which will be available in the info-record price history.
In the last purchase order - ZCIF condition will be maintained.
Hence it will adopt in the new PO, which is standard SAP behaviour.
Thanks & Regards,

Automatic PO and automatic header condition determination

Dear all,
We have business transaction where PO is getting created automatically. In real time, user is entering header condition manually, because header conditions are not allowed to have access sequence. It is difficult for users on tracking header condition manual entry details.
Can anyone throw some lights for using routine to have automatic entry of header condition while PO is created automatically ? Which routine to be explored to achieve automation of header condition value in PO ?

hi
m/06 frieght condition make header condition tick
changes which can be made
tab
under
tick the header condition
heder condition of fright
as three type
%basic
value
quantity
if you enter header condition value basis100
two line items is there in your PO ,On that time it will be updated 200 in header value
if you enter header condition % basis it will take %of total value after that
the amount will be distributed amoung the items
regards
vijay
Edited by: vijju489 on Jul 16, 2010 12:10 PM

Condition Type NAVS not determined for Goods PO

Hi all,
I am working on SRM 5.0 and R/3 4.6C.The problem im facing is for the tax condition determination for PO for Goods type which replicated from SRM to PO .
In case of Service PO,the conditions are determined correctly and can be seen in the PO print out.However In case of a goods PO,if i goto conditions tab in ME23N for the PO,the conditions (NAVs) are not determined as well as they cant be seen in PO print .
The config on R/3 side is Correct as in case of manual PO(PO created directly in R/3),the conditions are determined correctly.
Now when i debuuged the BAPi "BAPi_PO_CREATe1",i observed the following:
If i chnage the field PO_PRICE in the table POITEM to "1",then conditions are determined corretcly for the PO.However by dfault,the value for this field comes to "2".
This field is nothing but indicator of the price i.e. 1 for Gross and 2 for Net.
Can anybody explain me the link between this price and condition types determined in PO.
Thanks.

Check out SAP Note 580225 - Purchasing BAPIs: Conditions and pricing
Hope it helps

Determination of Shipping Condition in CMIR?

How is the shipping condition determined in CMIR?

Hi MSyamala ,
Shipping Condition do not comes from CMIR . please go to TCode VD51 & check the fields over there.
If Shipping Condition is maintained in Sales Document Type then It has got Priority over Customer Master of Ship-to-Party Shipping Tab.
Thanks & Regards,
Deepaks

Use of Release Procedure / status in Condition Table

What is the purpose of Release Procedure / Release status when creating condition tables ?

Hi
Release procedures are used in condition tables to control whether the condition types for these condition tables have to be read during pricing condition determination or not.
If the condition table status is released then only the condition types will be read during pricing determination. If the status is not released, then they can be used for information purposes or for simulation of pricing.
The release status is controlled by processing status too, which can be seen in condition record creation screen.
So in crux, the processing status with Release status help in simulation of pricing, blockign the condition records from being read during pricing etc.
For more information an F1 help on the following path will give you some more information.
SPROSD-BF-PRICING-DEFINE PROCESSING STATUS----Here read the documentation meant for this link. You will get some more clarity on this.
Rwd point if it helps.
Reward points if it helps.

Freight condition on pallet level

Hi Guys
Iu2019m stuck with a problem for a condition for freight. Sorry if it's answered somewhere else in the forum, but I haven't found it yet.
Currently there is a freight condition working for this which basically is using KG and there is a scale, which identifies the freight cost.
The freight condition in KG is created as an item condition and as a group condition, i.e. when more than one material in the order then the freight cost is distributed to every material line.
This works excellent, but does of course face some problems in the scale values.
We now want to create a new freight condition, which basically is basing the freight determination upon the number of pallets.
I have then created a new condition, which is created as an item condition and as a group condition and the relevant master data.
I have a scale which says:
0-1 pallet 50u20AC/pallet
1-2 pallet 49u20AC/pallet
2-3 pallet 48u20AC/pallet
etc.
If a material for instance is 100 cartons per pallet then the condition determination for an order will be:
Order 1:
Pos.nr 10 100 cartons = 1 pallet = freight 50u20AC
Order 2:
Pos.nr 10 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Pos.nr 20 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Result = freight 50u20AC
Order 3:
Pos.nr 10 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Pos.nr 20 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Pos.nr 30 1 carton = 1/100 of a pallet
Result = freight = 49u20AC + 1/100th of 49u20AC = 49,49u20AC
Order 4:
Pos.nr 10 50 cartons = ½ pallet
Result = freight = 25u20AC
Order 1 + 2 would be OK u2013 but only because it matches a full pallet
Order 3 + 4 would not be OK. For order 3 the result should be 2x49u20AC and for order 4 the cost should be 50u20AC
I have been trying to use the Alternative formula for condition base value (to round up the number of pallets to a whole number), but as this is only calculated on position level I canu2019t see what to do. Additionally I think I have also tried every combination in the book for the customizing of the condition, butu2026u2026.
Can anyone please give me a hint as this would be highly valuated??
rgds
Steff

Hi Raghu
I have also had my ABAP'er experimenting a bit with AltCTyp to determine the number of pallets, but unfortunately not something succesfully yet.
The problem with the AltCTyp was that I could easily have an alternative calculation, which would use this to determine the number of pallets and thereby the scale, but it wouldn't give me the correct value back.
If I can use the example of a full pallet in line 10 and a sample carton in line 20, then the total number of pallets is 1 pallet and one carton, i.e. it will be sent on two pallets.
When using AltCTyp I got two options:
[1]: line 10 (the price of one pallet) + line 20 (the price of one pallet / no of cartons in pallet * 1
[2]: line 10 (the price of one pallet) + line 20 (the price of one pallet)
When using AltCTyp it's my understanding that it's calculating per item line - handling all lines and group values - and distributing the values to each line.
I miss the option of SAP providing me the sum of all lines. This sum should then look in the scales where it identifies that it's above 1 pallet but below two, identify that it should be 2 pallets. Then it should take this freight cost of two pallets and distribute the amount to the lines according to the quantity, so the result of sending an extra pallet for this one line 20 would have an impact on both lines.
Basically I had thought that the scale formula could provide this for me, but..............
I will have my ABAP'er have a look at your suggestion for the user exit
rgds
Steff

Creation of change pointer for condition split

Hi,
We have SAP system which is integrated with PMM(mainly used for pricing).
Scenario is as explained below.
There is one condition record whose validity is from 25/12/2011 to End of TIme (EOT) for one price record.
Assume today (08/02/2012) business created new condition whose validity is 08/02/2012 to EOT for another price.
Now what happened is in condition table split happened one from 25/12/2011 to 07/02/2012 and one more from 08/02/2012 to EOT.
But we observed that while sending the information to PMM system through idoc system is not sending the condiion record 25/12/2011 to 07/02/2012.
*Now question is whether this is SAP standard functionality (not to send Past validity records) or it is custom change specific to company
.*Assume user creates conditon record whose validity is from tomorrow (09/02/2012) to EOT then split happens like 25/12/2011 to 08/02/2012 (which is today) and 09/02/2012 to EOT.
In this case idoc sends both the condition record as 08/02/2012 is today and not in the past.
Thanks and Regards
Raghavendra Pai

FYI... While pricing condition determination in sales order will refer the pricing value from condition record (with proper validity) based on pricing date.
Say, you condition record for base price as PR00.
Rate
UoM
Valid from
Valid to
100
per EA
01.01.2011
31.01.2011
120
per EA
01.01.2012
31.01.2012
Now you are creating a sales order on 09 Feb 2012. But the pricing date is 21.12.2011.
Then system will copy pricing as 100 instead of 120.
This example practical happens when you create sales order with reference to contract or quotation.
Now, in SAP PMM, I hope you are maintaining condition records through Idoc or may be real sync, then you should have provision for accommodate, these change in pricing and validity.
Now question is whether this is SAP standard functionality (not to send Past validity records) or it is custom change specific to company
Now it totally depends on your/client organization/business process requirement.
I hope this can assist you in understanding. If you have any further concern or doubt, do revert back
Regards
JP

Condition Determination in CN33

Similar Messages

Maybe you are looking for