Condition Inactive because of subsequent price.
Hi All,
During Sales Order Processing in pricing only the last condition is actived & get reflected in net price. All other conditions are shown inactive. When I check the Item-Conditon-Details on the Control Data (Inactive Field) the status is shown Y- Inactive because of subsequent price.
We have created variant confugiration for the material.
Can anyone guide me where I have made the mistake.
Thanks is advance
hi,
i dont think it is really a mistake when the system says a condition is inactive because of a subsequent one. Like for example in a sales order there is a PR00 list price and some discount conditions on it.
But the moment we supply the sales order with a Net price (PN00 condition type)value we dont the discounts also to go along with that. because net price is after considering everything. In such case the discount conditions become inactive because of a subsequent price.
In your case please check your pricing procedure if it has purposefully been configured that way.
regards
sadhu kishore
Similar Messages
-
Item Price Y Inactive because of subsequent price
Hello Experts,
I have a 2 pricing conditions with condition class "Price" (B) in the pricing procedure.
This resulted that the first condition type having control status as Y "Inactive because of subsequent price".
Only the second condition type is active.
Please confirm that there is no impact on posting to accounting.
The confirmation is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
HJMYI have a 2 pricing conditions with condition class "Price"
(B) in the pricing procedure.
Though already confirmation has been given that there wont be any effect, can you please let me know why you have maintained two pricing which seems to be illogical.
G. Lakshmipathi -
Inactive conditions (Type Y - Inactive because of subsequent price)
Hi all
I have a curious case that seems to be unexplained...
The inactive conditions of type Y
When are the condition types deemed inactive if type Y ??
There was no entries maintained in the condition records upon the existing entry or the entry existing was not changed. There are no exclusions maintained for the condition type as well. The condition type that I am using here is of the condition class A (discounts/surcharges).
The condition is inactive at the document level of type Y.
However, when I check the status information of the condition type, I find the message "Condition is active"
Kindly provide me pointers to resolve the overlying issue.
Thanks in advance
Vinodh SIt could be due to two reasons
1) Please note that If both the condition types has a Condition Class as B (Prices) only one pricing condition in the lowest level ( step number ) will be active and rest are made inactive by the system. This is a standard behavior. So If you have two condition types with same condition class, you may need to change the first one to be a discount or surcharge in V/06
2) Next go to IMG Path -- SD --> Basic Functions --> Pricing --> Pricing Control --> Define Pricing By Item Category --> Activate pricing for item categories. There check you have maintained "X" for your item category under the tab "Pricing" and blank against "Statistical value".
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
How to handle Pricing error " Y " Inactive because of subseque
Hi,
ZSAA is Basic price condition type, it determineds the value through alter.cal type as 100.00 usd, but it shows as
ZSAA is "Inactive because of subsequent pricing".
In the pricing screen, if we select the condtion details of ZSAA,
the new screen branch out, in this under control data, we
have below fields, in this Inactive field automatically says
"Y" - Inactive because of subseque
Condition class,
Cal.type
Condi category
Condi.control
Condition origin
Inactive
Can any body tell me what is the issue? how to handle this errohi,
let me put it this way, ZSAA is deriving the value of 100 $ through alt calculation type based on a different condition, for example Z123.
the alternative cal type is doing some calculation based on the value fetched for Z123. Now there must be some other condition type in your pricing procedure which is more relevant to the sales transaction you are doing. Now obviously the price determined for ZSAA should no longer be applicable because you should not have two prices active at the same time for a given sales order.
Let me try explain further, for example if there is net price condition availble in your pricing procedure. ZSAA determined some value and is active, but as soon as you enter value for this net price condition say ZNET, the ZSAA condition becomes inactive. Because after net price you dont need calculate any furhter discounts.
Hope it helps.
regards,
Sadhu Kishore -
What does 'condition inactive' mean? Thanks in advance!
Hi, This question has puzzled me many days, but still no answer. Any one can help me ? Many many thanks!!
In SAP GUI, under item conditions tab, there is a column 'Exception' with traffic lights.
Three kinds of tracffic lights are avaible in this column, red, green, and Amber Light.
The explantion of F1 help is not so clearly. My questiones are:
1. If a condition type is with 'amber light', what does that mean?
2. If a condition type is with 'green light', what does that mean?
3. If a condition type is with 'red light', what does that mean?
4. If a condition type is inactive, How can I know why this condition type is 'inactive'?
Thanks soooooo much!!
Regards,
Hedy
Edited by: hedyee on Jul 25, 2009 12:06 PMHi,
Condition inactive means, condition is not active in that particular transaction.
The meaning for traffic lights is
Red: Condition Contains errors, which has to be rectified before saving.
Green: Condition is active in the transaction and the prices are taken into consideration.
Amber: Condition is inactive on various reasons (for e.g., due to subsequent price)
If a condition is inactive, the tool tip in Web UI shows the reason. But in SAP GUI, We need to go through the pricing procedure.
Regards,
Krishna -
Hi,
In sales order all conditions are active (green), but in invoice all have become inactive.
Only list price is of manually entry, rest are from conditon records.
In copy control pricing type given as "D"
In case of this invoice the excise posting has been done but the commercial posting is not happening due to net value is zero becoz of inactive conditions
RegdHi
Kindly check Basic Pricing conditio type is assigned to pricing determination procedure at OVKK.
also check out a/c key is assigned to condition type in V/08.
at OVTP check ur Billing type is assigned to DuPP.
and also check the billing relevency whether it is oreder related or delivery related and accordingly cross check pricing type at copy control level..
thanks
Mahesh -
Manual pricing condition to overwrite the Net price
Hi ,
We have a wrong price scenario for Russia where the Sales order was created in one month and the delivery created in next subsequent month. Delay is due to some customs clearace
Now the scenario is , we have a cost price (VPRS) which will have the cost from the material master
and based on which the net price is calculated which is 15% of the VPRS
If the VPRS is 100
Base price is 115
and the discount is 10
Net price is 105
Tad is 3% which is 108.15
Now the delivery will happen after getting the customs clearance and the material price might have changed to 120
Now due to this the user will change the price manually in the sales order on which the tax will be calculated
Let say, he will maintain the Net price as 128 after deducting the discount 10 as well
and now the tax should be calculated as 3 % on the 128
I am trying to se PN00 and PMIN condition type from standard but those condtions are de actving the remaining condition includig the tax as well
Please let me know if tere is any condtion which will just ovrwrite the netprice after the discount and TAX should be calculated on that
regards,
santoshHi Santosh,
Surely, you have seen them, but read these notes and related notes:
Note 1365939 - VPRS logic and Customizing settings in SD
Note 201830 - Calculation of the net price of an item
Note 547570 - FAQ: VPRS in pricing
Note 201830 will help you with some examples.
I think that the use of VOFM would be the last resort.
I hope this helps you
Regards
Eduardo -
Pricing condition - How to Determine/Calculate price excl. VAT
Hi,
We've the following configured:
ZPMC - payment costs - 1 euro (price incl. VAT)
MWSI caculates VAT over all items and posts them to the appropriate G/L account.
The payment costs excl. VAT needs to be posted to a G/L account aswell. However in our current configuration no 'payment cost excl. VAT' amount is available. One solution would be calculating the 'amount excl. vat' via a routine however i would like to whether we can achieve this via customizations / standard configurations?
Inputs are greatly appreciated.
Kind regards,
TimMay be you can try with the following option
1) Create a condition type in V/06 with "Calculation type" as percent (A). Also maintain "X" for the field "Plus/minus" with access sequence assigned there
2) Go to V/07, select that access sequence and maintain table 305 & 307 there
3) Go to VK11, key in the above condition type and maintain the required tax percent here and save
4) Assign this condition type above the step to your Payment Cost excl.VAT and the From-To step number should be that of your ZPMC
5) Now this Payment Cost step number should have the From-To till the step number of point (4)
6) Assign a separate Account Key to step of (5) and parallely, in VKOA, assign a new G/L account to this account key.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi -
Condition type GMPP (GTM Purchase Price)
Does anyone here have experience working with condition type GMPP? I
I am working with Global Trade Contract (Links SD & MM SO with PO) and would like clarification on how GMPP is used.
Is GMPP used to capture MM Purchase price, so ir can be statistically transferred to SD side? I am trying to figure it out, as the identical condition type exists in SD.
But I am getting stuck in the configuration....does anyone have any insight on GMPP?
Within condition type for GMPP, there is a box checked off under Sales pricing that are fishy.
rel. to pricing CHECKBOX
Princing On/off CHECKBOX
My goal is to have GMPP captured on the MM side, and have this value transfer (statistically) to the SD side so I can see profitability.
If anyone can provide any insight into this condition type, it would be greatly appreciated!!!
BTW, We are in ECC 6.0 and any insight into this would be greatly appreciated.
Regards
KenHi, I am facing the same problem now. Did you able to get the purchase price statistically to sales side? Reg, KK
-
Condition inactive while making proforma invoice
Hi All,
when I am making a performa invoice for replenishment delivery for Stock transport order the pricing condition I am using is coming inactive with indicator "Inactive via formulae of incorrect".
Please help ASAP as we are at critical stage in the project.
Regards,
Puneet MakkarHi Dinesh,
yes it is a domestic document .. and it is non spesific for any location or material.. its just when i create a performa invoice from delivery type NL .. actually wht i got to know while debugging that it is not picking the document currency .. can u please daignose any valid reason of this.
Please help ASAP.
Regards,
Puneet Makkar -
Change PO because of wrong price?
Hello gurus,
I have got one less technical question:
Let's say I accidentally create a PO wih a wrong price for the ordered goods, e.g. 100$ instead of 1,000$. The vendor does not notice this, delivers the goods and sends us an invoice for 1,000$ (which, of course, is correct).
Now, in my view, I can create a new invoice document in SAP (using MIRO or MIR7) with reference to my PO. Its default value will be 100$ (from the PO), but I then can change the value to the correct 1,000$. Of course, this will exceed the tolerances for differences between PO and invoice. But I should be able to post the invoice anyway, it just will have a payment block. This block can later be released using MRBR.
Now my question: Does anyone see any error or problem in the process described? And especially: Does anyone see any need to change the price in the PO so that the invoice can then be postet without differences?
Thanks in advance
AliciaHi Alicia,
For this case you have two alternatives depend on the moment when you knew that PO was wrong:
1. If you create PO:100
GR 100
No invoice posted
You could reverse GR to modify PO to 1000, to enter GR again with correct amount and then post invoice
2. If you create PO:100
GR 100
Invoice posted 1000--> modify amount from PO from 100 to 1000. You need to analyse the assignment of difference 900, because your stock value before invoice posting is 100 and it is not correct, it should be 1000. Maybe when you post invoice difference could be assigned to material account 900 and procedure will be correct (only GR/IV stay with 100, but is closed).
Both procedures I think are correct.
Good luck.
Lili. -
My local BestBuy store won't let me price match with Walmart because Walmart's price is too low
as what title said(NOT clearance item)
I was supposed to get the movie tonight
here is the movie at BestBuy:
Titanic (4-Disc)(Blu-ray/DVD Combo Pack)(with e-copy) 1997 BestBuy Link SKU: 5401018 BestBuy is selling $21.99
Here is the SAME ITEM at Walmart:
{removed per forum guidelines} is selling $3.58
I'm living in NYC, no Walmart around
I would have to pay something like $4 shipping from Walmart to get this movie
I still have about over $300 BestBuy GC plus elite membership to get a free shipping
Is anyone can tell me the price protection/price match policy for BestBuy?Hello williamtan,
Welcome to the forum! Using our Price Match Guarantee can be a fantastic way to save some money on your purchases while still visiting your preferred stores. It is discouraging to hear you may have been dissatisfied with your experience requesting this price match on a copy of Titanic at our Atlantic Center store in Brooklyn, NY.
Per our Price Match Guarantee, sadly we do not price match WalMart.com. That being said, we would price match a Wal-Mart that is within a 25 mile radius of one of our stores, assuming the product meets the rest of the criteria, including being the identical item. Unfortunately, as you state there aren’t any Wal-Marts around, we wouldn’t be able to provide this price match. Furthermore, upon my review, it does seem that these may not be identical items.
Given this information, it would seem that the Atlantic Center store would have been correct in denying this price match, although I’m sorry if you were provided any inaccurate information as to the reason for the denial. When such instances come along, we should be sure we are courteous and clearly explain the Price Match Guarantee. I apologize if this experience has caused you any dismay.
Thank you for taking the time to register with the forum to share your experience with us! Please know that I’ve made sure to note your price match experience at our Atlantic Center store in detail so that we may have it available to better our methods in the future. If you should have any questions, please let us know!
Regards,
Tasha|Social Media Specialist | Best Buy® Corporate
Private Message -
Incompletion set up on PO/STO because of missing price
Hi,
I am SD consultant and have a requirement in STO/PO process where we want to prevent STO/PO creation if the pricing is zero or not available at the time of STO/PO creation.
Can it be controlled through message type setting through config ? (like putting a hard code msg ). If yes, pls advise the steps.
Or it can be done by hardcoding in program. Please advise.
How should I go about it ?
Regards,
AnoopHi Uttkarsh,
Thanks for your inputs. We have below mentioned situation here:
In STO and PO, we use different pricing procedures and in the billing (F8 and IV respectively), Intercompany sales pricing procedure is being pulled in the billing documents which is different from STO and PO pricing procedures.
We have a business requirement that we want to prevent STO/PO creation if the pricing is zero or not present for one of the condition type in Intercompany pricing procedure which actually gets triggered at billing level, this condition type is already marked as "required" field but it gets triggered at billing level.
This condition type is not maintained in STO/PO pricing procedure, so even if I maintain the same in STO/PO pricing procedure, it would not be of much use I guess.
I am not sure how we can control it in this situation, we do not want STO/PO to get created by system if pricing is not maintained or zero value and this pricing needs to be checked in Intercompany pricing procedure, not in STO/PO pricing procedure.
Any ideas ? I can think of doing coding in the PO creation program at this stage.. -
SD planned revenues from inactive price condition
Hello,
please assist.
Revenue elements from the SD pricing procedure (coditions) that are not statistical are updated as planned revenue on the sales order item (within table COSP with the business transaction SDOR).
The relevant revenue accounts are determined within the revenue account determination.
Is the revenue account determination processed also for SD conditions, which are inactive (KOMV-KINAK)?
We have got an issue, that also some conditions, which are inactive because of subsequent price (KOMV-KINAK=Y) are updated into the COSP-SDOR as planned revenue. Therefore the position has more planned revenue within the result analysis and as we use the revenue based result analysis method, it influences the WIP calculation.
Thanks in advance
PIssue solved.
The reason was the SAP Note 1062462.
This note is used to extract also inactive conditions into BW. Unfortunatelly, due to this modification, the inactive conditions are not deleted from xmckomv, which is used also for updating the planned revenues (and other SIS statistics, which are based on the conditions), so they were added to the planned revenues.
We have to deimplement the note. -
Condition value is Inactive in sales order
Hi Friends,
I am facing the following problem,
In the sales order, it is picking all condition records as per pricing procedure and calculates perfectly. But in the header net value field it is not updating. It is showing one condition record value only.
During analysis I found that the all records is inactive except which one is updating in the net value field and reason is "Y - Inactive because of Subsequent Price."
Please help me to solve this issue.
Thanks in Advance.
DilipDear Dilip
For information, when you have a condition record showing as
inactive it is because you have a base price condition record
somewhere below your discounts.
Check your condition records below the discounts, are
there any of condition class 'B'? If yes, then that is why they are inactive.
thanks
G. Lakshmipathi
Maybe you are looking for
-
I can't get some song on my iphone they work off of the computer but they wont show up on my phone they are in the "on my iphone" section but they gray and have a gray dotted circle next to them i have tried every thing I just want them on my phone H
-
How do I change my email account on my mac from Mail to Icloud?
Does anyone know how to change my mail account on my mac to I cloud? since i have changed to Icloud on my iphone it seems that I can't access the old mailserver anymore. What do I do? Thanks for any advise Alex
-
Hi all, Two questions regarding mitigation in SAP GRC AC: 1) Reading through the forum, we have seen that if monitor does not execute the report (action) within the frequecny set and alert is generated. Are these alerts sent out to the mitigation con
-
Interface with a static method.
I have tried to define an interface which requires a subclass to implement a static function. interface Testable { public static TestFrame getTestFrame(); The idea is the the Testable object must be created with the appropriate constructer arguements
-
Safari is not robust against network and CPU/memory fluctuations
Safari 5 isn't robust against network fluctuations. I use an Apple router and I have a very consistent connection (which lets me keep a single TCP session open to the outside world for months at a time). Yet, when I restore a crashed Safari session w