COPA: Report problem

Dear all ,
I have created 1 Profitability report using ke31 and form by using ke34.
Below is the screen shot of ke31:
But while executing the report using ke30 profit center is not available under "Navigation".Below is the screen shot of ke30:
I`m unable to find out where i went wrong...kindly help...
Regards
Nitisha

Dear Nithisha,
Adding to the comments mentioned by Mr. Ranjeesh,
You have selected the check box and mentioned 500.
Please check is it a Standard hierarchy / Profit center group...?
If group is not exists, remove the check box and select provide the range or leave it blank.
Save the settings and try to execute the report.
Regards,
Pavan Kumar Arvapally

Similar Messages

  • Help- COPA Report KE30 Unusual value problem

    Hi,
    My COPA report from ke30 showing the bellow value which is unusal to my real value. though we are now entering backlog data but the COGS value which is showing is more less than the actual value. please suggest what to do to correct the report.
    Sales quantity            1,958,412.000
    Gross Revenue             653593,271.00
    VAT                            86,064,276.00
    Net Revenue(aftr VAT      567528,995.00
    Sales Excess              19,721,488.00
    Freight Revenue            5,491,314.00
    Total Revenues            592741,797.00
    % Based discount              0.00
    Quantity based disco       0.00
    Material Rebate               0.00
    Customer Rebate            9,556,570.00
    Free of charge                 3,499.97
    Net Revenue(Aft dis) 583188,726.97
    Raw Material                       0.00
    Packing Material              0.00
    Labour Var                         0.00
    Raw Material                       0.00
    Packing Material              0.00
    Labour Var                         0.00
    Labour Fix                         0.00
    Power Var                          0.00
    Power Fixed                        0.00
    Mfg OH Var                         0.00
    Mfg OH Fixed                  0.00
    Packing OH Variable      0.00
    COGS                           495040,646.82
    COGS Internal price       24,647,600.96
    Mfg Cost(Standard)            0.00
    Production Variance       28,883,245.46-
    Purchase variance          5,002,496.04-
    Revaluation of Inven         275,261.45-
    Actual Cost               34,161,002.95-
    Gross Profit              617349,729.92
    Admn Exp                           0.00
    Depreciation                       0.00
    Finance Exp                        0.00
    Selling and Dist Exp          0.00
    Thanks
    Rajib

    Hi rajibimran
    There is a transaction (KE27) that reavaluates standard price for actual price.
    I dont know how your system is set, but during months all cost elements are set using standard price.
    During period end closing, after you run actual costs (CKMLCP) you have to revaluate CO-PA with actual price.
    Regards
    Fred

  • Want to add number of sales orders in a COPA report or form

    Hi All
    I created a COPA report that has two columns: sales from sales orders & sales from billing documents. Now I want to add columns which shows number of sales orders that make up sales. Can any one explain me , how can we acheive this  With a user exit, .
    thanks in advance for looking into this

    Hi Steve,
    Walter is very right in saying so.
    In SD module itself you can get some reports like this.
    Even in COPA you will get these kind reports.  But if your company is a big company and have lots of sales orders,
    Then you will have serious problems with System performance issue. 
    When you define that sale order is a segment level character, then system will ear up the resources and take very long time in executing the reports.
    But for some reason this requirement is a must case, then it is very simple
    you define Sale order in either form or report,
    then give the variable parameters like Co.Code, Period etc. you will get all the sales orders details for the selected period
    But think about not going for it before you make up your mind
    Best Regards
    Surya

  • How to Add a new Selection Field in COPA Report

    Hi Gurus
    I'm new on SAP COPA reporting and I don't know how to solve this problem.
    I need add a new Selection-screen field (char1), not connected with any characteristic.
    This is necessary becuase if the user flag this field, when teh report is running I'll replace some key-figure values using the EXIT  
    ZXYEXF05. I don't find any instruction how to define this simple kinfd of variable, and use it into a Report.
    Thank-you in advance for your help.
    Claudio

    Hi
    I'll try to explain better my need.
    I've 10 CO-PA Key-Figures used to Split in the Cost of a material in different Cost Items.
    Using the customizing I fill these key-figures using some rules.
    The new requirement is use SOMETIME the same KF, by displaying different Costs overwritting the original values using the exit ZXYEXF05. But I need to know when the user wants consider the original value of KF, and when he wants overwrite these values (when I have to run teh exit). So I thought to create a new Selection-screen field (Char1), to permit to the user to pass to some report this user request. I thought to define a global variable, and add it to several reports when this feature is required.
    Can you suggest a better solution ???
    I could create some empty KF and fill them using teh exit, but I would prefer not expand the CO-PA structure.
    Thanks for help.
    Claudio

  • Copa Report selection screen in display mode

    Dear Friends:
    In COPA Report, we have sales group,Fiscal year and Currency type in our selection screen,sales group should be in display mode i.e. the user
    must not be able to change the sales group.
    How to reslove the problem.Please advise.
    Thanks&Regards
    MSReddy

    Hello
    Create some authourization checks for the user. Try to check with BASIS team.
    Also check if you can default entries for a particular user.
    reg

  • COPA report assignment - missing link

    Hello
    In our COPA line-item reports I have setup some report assignments in a way, that via the outgoing invoice number we step directly into the invoice in VF03. Similar setup has been made for FI dokuments, but the FI document number in the COPA is not copied to FB03 - instead I just get the latest document number I have entered in another transaction.
    Before our upgrade from 4.7 to 6.0 this 'feature' did work.
    Any ideas what to do?
    BR
    Søren Kirch

    Hi
    Unfortunatey this didn't solve my problem.
    I have made some report assignments in our COPA reports to the invoice and FI document, but after upgrade from 4.7 to 6.0 the FI document number is no longer linked to COPA (not copied into FB03) eventhough the fiscal year and company code are copied...
    Best regards
    Søren Kirch

  • RE: KE30 COPA report

    Hi All,
    Can anyone tell me about COPA report KE30 is aready is being used this reports by my users but the problem is recently they created 2 new condition types therefore in COPA report KE30 show some amount extra in customer got something less both should be matching for that what i have to do. i need to deduct some amount which are haveing price new condition type how to do this pleas let me know.

    Hello,
    Run report KEAT to find out the difference between COPA and FI and SD.
    Regards,
    Ravi

  • Copa report selection screen

    In copa reports, i selected a report, i get the following report selections
    from period/year
    To period/year
    plan/act.indicator
    version
    I want to include sales group to this selection screen of the copa report.please advise.
    Thanks&regards
    MSReddy

    Dear Friends:
    In T.code KEA5, Characteristics fields KMKDGR (customer group) is already present. I want to remove the Characteristics fields which are not necessary for my report.
    In field Catalog (menu path-Characteristics-change selection), I selected authorization group, sales group.
    I get the following warning messages
    Field KMVKGR has the same name as field VKGRP
    I saved the Characteristics fields for sales group and authorization group despite the warnings and activated them.
    But when i go to t.code KEA5 again (Change Characteristic overview), the fields of authorization group, sales group are not saved.
    The sales group (ex:Z01) has to be defaulted when the user login.Is it possible?
    How to overcome the problem?Please advise.
    Thanks&Regards
    MSReddy
    Message was edited by:
            Sridhar M

  • Auth. obj. controlling layout saving for a COPA report

    Hello,
    Could someone please guide me on which authorization object controls the capability to use the menu option : Settings , Layout, Saving...   for a COPA report.
    The problem is that this options appears dimmed for the users.
    Thank you in advance for your cooperation.
    Best regards.
    Reda Khalifa

    Hi,
    Could you check these authority check objects S_RS_COMP and S_RS_COMP1.
    Thanks,
    NN

  • COPA Report- Cost Elements

    Hi All,
    We have done the required configuration for COPA. We have created a COPA (Costing Based) report as well. The client wants this COPA report to be run for the first quarter of 2008 i.e. April 2008 to June 2008.
    However, discount values for the said period are not flowing to this report.
    Verification reveals that, no cost element is created for "Discount Given" GL Account. Hence, only revenues, from billing document, are being posted to CO area. The same values are updated in COPA also.
    As per my knowledge, unless Cost Elements are created values won't flow to CO and COPA.
    Can anybody help me to overcome the problem. . . ?? i.e. How to get the values in COPA report for the said period . . .
    Thanks in advance . . .
    Regards,
    Ravi Kumar

    Hi
    Your understanding is perfect we need a cost element for transfering the data to CO and COPA.For flow of values to COPA from SD we need to make the following config.
    Create the GL account with cost element category 11 or12
    Map the discount condition type to COPA value field.
    Also it is very diffucult to identify the discount region wise customer wise etc.Since it is posted to one GL account.
    To overcome come this issue I guess the only option is to cancel the billing documents,maintain the config and the again create the billing documents.As you said the volume of transactions are high you can consider using LSMW for cancelling and recreating the billing documents.
    Regards
    Sandy.

  • COPA report showing as positive values which should be show as Nagitive val

    Dear Experts
    I have one issue with COPA and Profit center reports reconciliation where the both have same structure
    user  compareing the (Period :dec 2011)  report PCA and COPA there identified some values are difference  so we started investgation
    one of the cost element showing in nagitive value in accoungint document and same  it is showing postive value in COPA report
    that values for debit and credit line items are adding (,) insted of Cancellation  (+,-) , so that COPA report is incresed the value for one value field when compare with PCA report line items
    could you please let any guide me where is the problem is occuring
    thanks
    Rana

    Hi,
       The COPA sign logic depends on the cost element type used (costs or revenues) and also the customizing of the '+/-  transfer sign' in tcode KE4I.
    The following table shows an overview of how condition values are
    updated in CO-PA for billing documents from SD:
    Billing document (normal) "With +/- sign"    "Without +/- sign"
    Debit posting                          negative            positive
      (such as sales deductions)
    Credit posting                         positive            positive
      (such as sales revenues)
    Credit memo/return         "With +/- sign"    "Without +/- sign"
    Debit posting                          negative            negative
      (such as sales revenues)
    Credit posting                         positive            negative
      (such as sales deductions)
    The "+/- sign" refers to the "Transfer +/- sign" flag in tcode KE4I where you assign SD conditions to COPA value fields.
    If the system is behaving as shown above and you want a different behavior then you could change the sign in user exit COPA0002.
    regards
    Waman

  • COPA Report Data Inconsistency

    We have our QA box refreshed with PRD Box. So the data in the two systems is same. I have created summarization level for COPA report Ke30 because report is taking too long in PRD as data comes directly from segment levels.
    The numbers for the basic report in QA that are coming from the summarization levels do not match with the numbers of basic report in PRD. While these numbers were matching when summarization level was not used in QA. But these numbers match when I go to the line item level for the brands etc.I am unable to find why the numbers at the basic report level does not match. Any help is greatly appreciated.

    Check the CE3xxxx table.  Are the number of records the same from PRD and QA? If no, then data is missing.  If yes, then the report could be the source of the problem.

  • Runtime Error COPA Report KE30  - Assign_Length_0

    Dear users,
    As ABAP is unknown terrain for me, I stumbled upon an error which I can't seem to bypass.  I do not know wheter this is the right forum to ask the question, so if I'm wrong, please do correct me.
    Current situation
    1. I've added a user def COPA Characteristic to the operating concern X.
    2. I've made a realignment run to fill table CE40001 (prof segments)
    3. Ive created a report (with form) where the report uses the field (point 1) as a drill down object.
    When running this report, I immediatly get the error 'Assign length 0' - in program "SAPMKCBE", module "SEIG_POSITIONIEREN"
    When looking at the error it stumbles at understanding code.  It seems that
    1. looking for value in table  'field_tab', which is CE10001
    2. field "Reffl"
    But as I've checked the table, this field does not exist.  So this is where I'm stuck;
    Allready thanks for any help that you can provide!
    Ben
    74           IF SY-SUBRC EQ 0.
    75             IF L_S_LCOL_CHAR-DIMPR EQ DIMPR_L  OR
    76                L_S_LCOL_CHAR-DIMPR EQ DIMPR_KL OR
    77                L_S_LCOL_CHAR-DIMPR EQ DIMPR_LK.
    78               IF FIELD_TAB-FIENM NE SEIG-FNAM.
    79                 READ TABLE FIELD_TAB WITH KEY
    80                                      FIENM = SEIG-FNAM BINARY SEARCH.
    81               ENDIF.
    82               I = FIELD_TAB-REFLL.
    83               ASSIGN FELD1(I) TO <TEXT>.                   "#EC *
    84             ELSE.
    85               ASSIGN FELD1(20) TO <TEXT>.
    86             ENDIF.

    I found the issue regarding this problem. In customizing for the COPA characteristics, you have to define the default display for this characteristic in the COPA Report. This option can be set to "Long Text".
    As it seems, this field is (in my case) not activated, and it can't be activated.  Nor can it be maintained.
    As a result the report searches for 'long text - REFLL' which doesn't exist.
    solution:
    Change default view for the characteristic AND completly rebuild your report.  Since SAP doesn't read this value (default dispay) dinamicly, but only once while creating the report.
    regards and thanks for no help
    hope I could be of assistance to anybody else

  • Material regrouping in MM02 not reflecting in COPA report

    Hi,
    In my project during data conversion material was grouped wrongly. We realised it later once we started designing COPA reports. The material is used by seven company codes. The basic material group defined in basic data is used by all company codes while Material group 1,2,3 4 and 5 are used by company specific defined in sales orgs 2 View in MM master(MM01).
    I am designing report for three companies by using material group 1,2,3,4 and 5.
    We tried changing the material group 1,2,3,4 and 5 for wrongly grouped materials in MM02. But in COPA report these changes are not reflecting. The grouping in report is still as per the data conversion grouping.
    Please suggest on how should we rectify our material grouping to reflect in COPA report.
    Regds

    Hi,
    in COPA reports characteristics are read from the COPA tables, they are not dynamically derived at the time of executing the report. In the COPA tables oyu will find the characteristic as derived at the moment of posting the line item.
    If the characeristic that you want to rectify is in the definition of your your COPA segments - which you can check through TC KEQ3 - then there is possibility to carry changed master data over to past COPA data.
    TC KEND allows you change the existing COPA segments according to current master data. However, it will not make changes to table CE1XXXX, where COPA line items are stored, but changes happen on the segment level (CE4XXXX).
    This means that you always see the changes in COPA reports that read from segments, but not in line item based reports.
    To change your output from line item based reports I see no other possibilty but to make correcting entries in CE1XXXX using KE21N or KEFC.
    If you should consider using KEND please read the documentation for "realignment". It can create problems, for example if you have a SAP BW that is delta-updated from CE11XXX. Also your summarization levels for COPA have to be rebuilt after KEND.

  • COPA Report Formulas

    Hi Gurus,
    I am facing problem in COPA report formulas. My COPA report is showing wrong figures wherein the figures are calculated by formula. For e.g Actual figure is 40 and planned figure is 10. The percentage (%) variance figure should be 75. But I am getting some wrong figures. The formula defined is as follows.
    ((Actual-Planned)/Actual*100)
    Is there any other method to calculate the Variance % ?
    Please guide.
    regards,
    makrand

    Hello Makrand,
    The formula is not correct. The formula should be (Actual - Plan) / Plan x 100. This is because you are trying to find out how good you were against the plan. So if the plan is 100 and actual is 80 then the variance would be - 20 % which means there is 20 % negative variance and in you case of actual of 40 and plan of 10 the correct figure is not 75% but it is 300% this is because the actual is much higher than the plan.
    Kind Regards // Shaubhik
    Edited by: Shaubhikg on Nov 2, 2010 2:35 PM

Maybe you are looking for